What will the new character ⿰令和 look like?Why does Unicode have code points for MANSYON, APAATO and such?What's the deal with/origin of the character 曰?Understanding of the character 叉What is this character that looks like 人? Is it some kind of quote?Meaning of font variation in the case of the character 賭What on Earth is this kanji character?What is the rule in assigning kanji to a new word?What is the character etymology of 着 ?What does this character mean?What is the character etymology of 風?What is the meaning of the radical 手 as a part of character?
Placement of More Information/Help Icon button for Radio Buttons
How much mains leakage does an Ethernet connection to a PC induce, and what is the operating leakage path?
In Bayesian inference, why are some terms dropped from the posterior predictive?
In the UK, is it possible to get a referendum by a court decision?
Do creatures with a listed speed of "0 ft., fly 30 ft. (hover)" ever touch the ground?
Mathematica command that allows it to read my intentions
Why do I get negative height?
How does a dynamic QR code work?
Finitely generated matrix groups whose eigenvalues are all algebraic
What is the most common color to indicate the input-field is disabled?
Why is it a bad idea to hire a hitman to eliminate most corrupt politicians?
Finding the error in an argument
What Exploit Are These User Agents Trying to Use?
Is it a bad idea to plug the other end of ESD strap to wall ground?
Is there a hemisphere-neutral way of specifying a season?
Avoiding the "not like other girls" trope?
How can I deal with my CEO asking me to hire someone with a higher salary than me, a co-founder?
How to prevent "they're falling in love" trope
Is it possible to map the firing of neurons in the human brain so as to stimulate artificial memories in someone else?
Unlock My Phone! February 2018
Description list Formatting using enumitem
Am I breaking OOP practice with this architecture?
What is an equivalently powerful replacement spell for the Yuan-Ti's Suggestion spell?
Fair gambler's ruin problem intuition
What will the new character ⿰令和 look like?
Why does Unicode have code points for MANSYON, APAATO and such?What's the deal with/origin of the character 曰?Understanding of the character 叉What is this character that looks like 人? Is it some kind of quote?Meaning of font variation in the case of the character 賭What on Earth is this kanji character?What is the rule in assigning kanji to a new word?What is the character etymology of 着 ?What does this character mean?What is the character etymology of 風?What is the meaning of the radical 手 as a part of character?
On the Wikipedia page for the Reiwa period there's a section:
Implementation
The Unicode Consortium has already reserved a code point (U+32FF) for a new glyph which will combine halfwidth versions of reiwa's kanji, 令 and 和, into a single full-width character.
I'm finding it hard to imagine what ⿰令和 will look like though.
Any ideas?
kanji
add a comment |
On the Wikipedia page for the Reiwa period there's a section:
Implementation
The Unicode Consortium has already reserved a code point (U+32FF) for a new glyph which will combine halfwidth versions of reiwa's kanji, 令 and 和, into a single full-width character.
I'm finding it hard to imagine what ⿰令和 will look like though.
Any ideas?
kanji
add a comment |
On the Wikipedia page for the Reiwa period there's a section:
Implementation
The Unicode Consortium has already reserved a code point (U+32FF) for a new glyph which will combine halfwidth versions of reiwa's kanji, 令 and 和, into a single full-width character.
I'm finding it hard to imagine what ⿰令和 will look like though.
Any ideas?
kanji
On the Wikipedia page for the Reiwa period there's a section:
Implementation
The Unicode Consortium has already reserved a code point (U+32FF) for a new glyph which will combine halfwidth versions of reiwa's kanji, 令 and 和, into a single full-width character.
I'm finding it hard to imagine what ⿰令和 will look like though.
Any ideas?
kanji
kanji
asked yesterday
user3306356user3306356
5591619
5591619
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Since it is two characters put in a square for typographic consideration on legacy environments, not meant to be a single character, no stylistic adjustment would be made and it would just look like two compressed characters adjacent to each other.
Some Adobe staffs seemingly begin to work on the new glyph. He says the right shape should be the second one.
(https://twitter.com/ken_lunde/status/1112556766233948165)
cf. past era names...
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CJK_Compatibility)
2
I found this article, also written by Ken Lunde, after reading your answer: blogs.adobe.com/CCJKType/2019/03/era-name-ligature-history.html
– user3306356
yesterday
1
And this is a relevant question in this site: japanese.stackexchange.com/q/37132/5010
– naruto
yesterday
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "257"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fjapanese.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f66367%2fwhat-will-the-new-character-%25e4%25bb%25a4%25e5%2592%258c-look-like%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Since it is two characters put in a square for typographic consideration on legacy environments, not meant to be a single character, no stylistic adjustment would be made and it would just look like two compressed characters adjacent to each other.
Some Adobe staffs seemingly begin to work on the new glyph. He says the right shape should be the second one.
(https://twitter.com/ken_lunde/status/1112556766233948165)
cf. past era names...
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CJK_Compatibility)
2
I found this article, also written by Ken Lunde, after reading your answer: blogs.adobe.com/CCJKType/2019/03/era-name-ligature-history.html
– user3306356
yesterday
1
And this is a relevant question in this site: japanese.stackexchange.com/q/37132/5010
– naruto
yesterday
add a comment |
Since it is two characters put in a square for typographic consideration on legacy environments, not meant to be a single character, no stylistic adjustment would be made and it would just look like two compressed characters adjacent to each other.
Some Adobe staffs seemingly begin to work on the new glyph. He says the right shape should be the second one.
(https://twitter.com/ken_lunde/status/1112556766233948165)
cf. past era names...
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CJK_Compatibility)
2
I found this article, also written by Ken Lunde, after reading your answer: blogs.adobe.com/CCJKType/2019/03/era-name-ligature-history.html
– user3306356
yesterday
1
And this is a relevant question in this site: japanese.stackexchange.com/q/37132/5010
– naruto
yesterday
add a comment |
Since it is two characters put in a square for typographic consideration on legacy environments, not meant to be a single character, no stylistic adjustment would be made and it would just look like two compressed characters adjacent to each other.
Some Adobe staffs seemingly begin to work on the new glyph. He says the right shape should be the second one.
(https://twitter.com/ken_lunde/status/1112556766233948165)
cf. past era names...
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CJK_Compatibility)
Since it is two characters put in a square for typographic consideration on legacy environments, not meant to be a single character, no stylistic adjustment would be made and it would just look like two compressed characters adjacent to each other.
Some Adobe staffs seemingly begin to work on the new glyph. He says the right shape should be the second one.
(https://twitter.com/ken_lunde/status/1112556766233948165)
cf. past era names...
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CJK_Compatibility)
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
broccoli forestbroccoli forest
31.1k142104
31.1k142104
2
I found this article, also written by Ken Lunde, after reading your answer: blogs.adobe.com/CCJKType/2019/03/era-name-ligature-history.html
– user3306356
yesterday
1
And this is a relevant question in this site: japanese.stackexchange.com/q/37132/5010
– naruto
yesterday
add a comment |
2
I found this article, also written by Ken Lunde, after reading your answer: blogs.adobe.com/CCJKType/2019/03/era-name-ligature-history.html
– user3306356
yesterday
1
And this is a relevant question in this site: japanese.stackexchange.com/q/37132/5010
– naruto
yesterday
2
2
I found this article, also written by Ken Lunde, after reading your answer: blogs.adobe.com/CCJKType/2019/03/era-name-ligature-history.html
– user3306356
yesterday
I found this article, also written by Ken Lunde, after reading your answer: blogs.adobe.com/CCJKType/2019/03/era-name-ligature-history.html
– user3306356
yesterday
1
1
And this is a relevant question in this site: japanese.stackexchange.com/q/37132/5010
– naruto
yesterday
And this is a relevant question in this site: japanese.stackexchange.com/q/37132/5010
– naruto
yesterday
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Japanese Language Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fjapanese.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f66367%2fwhat-will-the-new-character-%25e4%25bb%25a4%25e5%2592%258c-look-like%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown