Difference between fermions and bosons in Statistical MechanicsIgnorance in statistical mechanicsIs there a Lagrangian formulation of statistical mechanics?Fermion vs. Bosons and particle vs. wave: is there a link?Geometry, Group Theory, and Statistical MechanicsDensity matrix in Quantum Statistical MechanicsNon coherence of Fermions and Bosons through $U(1)$Different postulates and statistical interpreations of quantum mechanicsWhy are composite fermions either bosons or fermions but not neither?What is special about the indistinguishability of Boson and Fermions?System of particles in classical mechanics and classical statistical mechanics

Can’t attend PhD conferences

Smooth Julia set for quadratic polynomials

Does the posterior necessarily follow the same conditional dependence structure as the prior?

Do flight schools typically have dress codes or expectations?

Did Karl Marx ever use any example that involved cotton and dollars to illustrate the way capital and surplus value were generated?

Why is there no havdallah when going from Yom Tov into Shabbat?

Abel-Jacobi map on symmetric product of genus 4 curve

Is there any set of 2-6 notes that doesn't have a chord name?

How to determine what is the correct level of detail when modelling?

In the Marvel universe, can a human have a baby with any non-human?

Does ultrasonic bath cleaning damage laboratory volumetric glassware calibration?

MH370 blackbox - is it still possible to retrieve data from it?

When is the original BFGS algorithm still better than the Limited-Memory version?

Why is C++ initial allocation so much larger than C's?

How to split an equation over two lines?

How to get cool night-vision without lame drawbacks?

What is the line crossing the Pacific Ocean that is shown on maps?

Using “sparkling” as a diminutive of “spark” in a poem

What sort of mathematical problems are there in AI that people are working on?

Is it damaging to turn off a small fridge for two days every week?

Impossible darts scores

What do you call a weak person's act of taking on bigger opponents?

How to perform Login Authentication at the client-side?

What are the penalties for overstaying in USA?



Difference between fermions and bosons in Statistical Mechanics


Ignorance in statistical mechanicsIs there a Lagrangian formulation of statistical mechanics?Fermion vs. Bosons and particle vs. wave: is there a link?Geometry, Group Theory, and Statistical MechanicsDensity matrix in Quantum Statistical MechanicsNon coherence of Fermions and Bosons through $U(1)$Different postulates and statistical interpreations of quantum mechanicsWhy are composite fermions either bosons or fermions but not neither?What is special about the indistinguishability of Boson and Fermions?System of particles in classical mechanics and classical statistical mechanics






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3












$begingroup$


I am an undergraduate student in Physics and Mathematics. I am now preaparing for my final exam in Statistical Mechanics and I would like some help in a particular point. So here it goes:



In the introductory course of Quantum Mechanics we have discussed how a global phase does not affect the physical state of the system (to be specific $|psirangle$ and $-|psirangle$ are the same state).



However, in the course of Statistical Mechanics, we predicted the existence of fermions and bosons by applying an elementary permutation of two particles
and seeing that the only possibilities are $hatP|psirangle = pm |psirangle$



What I have trouble understanding is that if the state is the same after the permutation, why do the particles have such a different behaviour.



Attempt at solution:



In my head, the way this could work is that indeed $|psirangle$ and $-|psirangle$ are the same state but the behaviour of the wave function (symmetric or antisymmetric with respect to particle interchange) is what determines if the system is a fermionic or a bosonic.



I am aware that the question is a bit wishy-washy, but I have been looking around in different sources and no one seems to adress this particular concern.



Any help or comments are appreciated



(PS: This is my first question ever, so any tips in question formulation are also welcome)










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Be careful in thinking of phase as arbitrary. There is only one arbitrary phase in an entire system. In systems of more than one particle the second and subsequent particles have a meaningful phase difference relative the first one.
    $endgroup$
    – dmckee
    Jun 7 at 18:40










  • $begingroup$
    @dmckee That seems like an answer, rather than a comment. :-)
    $endgroup$
    – rob
    Jun 8 at 17:53

















3












$begingroup$


I am an undergraduate student in Physics and Mathematics. I am now preaparing for my final exam in Statistical Mechanics and I would like some help in a particular point. So here it goes:



In the introductory course of Quantum Mechanics we have discussed how a global phase does not affect the physical state of the system (to be specific $|psirangle$ and $-|psirangle$ are the same state).



However, in the course of Statistical Mechanics, we predicted the existence of fermions and bosons by applying an elementary permutation of two particles
and seeing that the only possibilities are $hatP|psirangle = pm |psirangle$



What I have trouble understanding is that if the state is the same after the permutation, why do the particles have such a different behaviour.



Attempt at solution:



In my head, the way this could work is that indeed $|psirangle$ and $-|psirangle$ are the same state but the behaviour of the wave function (symmetric or antisymmetric with respect to particle interchange) is what determines if the system is a fermionic or a bosonic.



I am aware that the question is a bit wishy-washy, but I have been looking around in different sources and no one seems to adress this particular concern.



Any help or comments are appreciated



(PS: This is my first question ever, so any tips in question formulation are also welcome)










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Be careful in thinking of phase as arbitrary. There is only one arbitrary phase in an entire system. In systems of more than one particle the second and subsequent particles have a meaningful phase difference relative the first one.
    $endgroup$
    – dmckee
    Jun 7 at 18:40










  • $begingroup$
    @dmckee That seems like an answer, rather than a comment. :-)
    $endgroup$
    – rob
    Jun 8 at 17:53













3












3








3





$begingroup$


I am an undergraduate student in Physics and Mathematics. I am now preaparing for my final exam in Statistical Mechanics and I would like some help in a particular point. So here it goes:



In the introductory course of Quantum Mechanics we have discussed how a global phase does not affect the physical state of the system (to be specific $|psirangle$ and $-|psirangle$ are the same state).



However, in the course of Statistical Mechanics, we predicted the existence of fermions and bosons by applying an elementary permutation of two particles
and seeing that the only possibilities are $hatP|psirangle = pm |psirangle$



What I have trouble understanding is that if the state is the same after the permutation, why do the particles have such a different behaviour.



Attempt at solution:



In my head, the way this could work is that indeed $|psirangle$ and $-|psirangle$ are the same state but the behaviour of the wave function (symmetric or antisymmetric with respect to particle interchange) is what determines if the system is a fermionic or a bosonic.



I am aware that the question is a bit wishy-washy, but I have been looking around in different sources and no one seems to adress this particular concern.



Any help or comments are appreciated



(PS: This is my first question ever, so any tips in question formulation are also welcome)










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I am an undergraduate student in Physics and Mathematics. I am now preaparing for my final exam in Statistical Mechanics and I would like some help in a particular point. So here it goes:



In the introductory course of Quantum Mechanics we have discussed how a global phase does not affect the physical state of the system (to be specific $|psirangle$ and $-|psirangle$ are the same state).



However, in the course of Statistical Mechanics, we predicted the existence of fermions and bosons by applying an elementary permutation of two particles
and seeing that the only possibilities are $hatP|psirangle = pm |psirangle$



What I have trouble understanding is that if the state is the same after the permutation, why do the particles have such a different behaviour.



Attempt at solution:



In my head, the way this could work is that indeed $|psirangle$ and $-|psirangle$ are the same state but the behaviour of the wave function (symmetric or antisymmetric with respect to particle interchange) is what determines if the system is a fermionic or a bosonic.



I am aware that the question is a bit wishy-washy, but I have been looking around in different sources and no one seems to adress this particular concern.



Any help or comments are appreciated



(PS: This is my first question ever, so any tips in question formulation are also welcome)







quantum-mechanics statistical-mechanics fermions bosons






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jun 7 at 9:18









HightideHightide

183 bronze badges




183 bronze badges







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Be careful in thinking of phase as arbitrary. There is only one arbitrary phase in an entire system. In systems of more than one particle the second and subsequent particles have a meaningful phase difference relative the first one.
    $endgroup$
    – dmckee
    Jun 7 at 18:40










  • $begingroup$
    @dmckee That seems like an answer, rather than a comment. :-)
    $endgroup$
    – rob
    Jun 8 at 17:53












  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Be careful in thinking of phase as arbitrary. There is only one arbitrary phase in an entire system. In systems of more than one particle the second and subsequent particles have a meaningful phase difference relative the first one.
    $endgroup$
    – dmckee
    Jun 7 at 18:40










  • $begingroup$
    @dmckee That seems like an answer, rather than a comment. :-)
    $endgroup$
    – rob
    Jun 8 at 17:53







4




4




$begingroup$
Be careful in thinking of phase as arbitrary. There is only one arbitrary phase in an entire system. In systems of more than one particle the second and subsequent particles have a meaningful phase difference relative the first one.
$endgroup$
– dmckee
Jun 7 at 18:40




$begingroup$
Be careful in thinking of phase as arbitrary. There is only one arbitrary phase in an entire system. In systems of more than one particle the second and subsequent particles have a meaningful phase difference relative the first one.
$endgroup$
– dmckee
Jun 7 at 18:40












$begingroup$
@dmckee That seems like an answer, rather than a comment. :-)
$endgroup$
– rob
Jun 8 at 17:53




$begingroup$
@dmckee That seems like an answer, rather than a comment. :-)
$endgroup$
– rob
Jun 8 at 17:53










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

The main difference is more visible if you apply the permutation to some coordinates, say $x_1, x_2$ of the particles. These might be positions or spins or whatever you want, a property of the two particles where $x_1$ is the property of the particle $1$ and $x_2$ of the particle $2$. Let's work with the wave function $langle x_1, x_2|psirangle$ where we know, $hatP$ being self adjoint $$pmlangle x_1, x_2|psirangle=langle x_1, x_2|hatP|psirangle=langle x_2, x_1|psirangle$$
Now consider the fermonic case, the one with a minus sign$$langle x_1, x_2|psirangle=-langle x_2, x_1|psirangle$$
and look at the case $x_1=x_2=x$



$$langle x, x|psirangle=-langle x, x|psirangle$$



This clearly implies $langle x, x|psirangle=0$, lo and behold, two fermions can't be in the same quantum state! Bosons have no such problem, as there is no minus sign. This is the Pauli exclusion principle and it's the main "tangible" difference between bosons and fermions.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I see, it truly is clearer if you work with wave functions. So the main difference is actually that the wave function that represents a system of fermions is different from the wave function representing a system of fermions (the first one being antisymmetric under permutation of 2 coordinates). However, the physical state of the system before and after the permutation is the same, as it should be, because the particles are identical!
    $endgroup$
    – Hightide
    Jun 7 at 10:25







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes, to put it more formally, choosing whether your wave functions are symmetric or antisymmetric divides your Hilbert space into two different 1D representations of the permutation group. Basically you "select" all the wave functions that are symmetric and you call them bosonic, same for antisymmetric and fermionic, but both these sets of wave functions have the property that their norm squared doesn't change under $S_N$. All the wave functions that don't belong in either category, you throw them away.
    $endgroup$
    – user2723984
    Jun 7 at 11:10











  • $begingroup$
    That was exactly the answer I needed. Thank you very much!
    $endgroup$
    – Hightide
    Jun 7 at 11:21


















2












$begingroup$


(to be specific |ψ⟩ and −|ψ⟩ are the same state).




Err... yes and no. As analogy, consider the numbers $i$ and $-i$. Whenever you have a function expressed in terms of real numbers, $i$ and $-i$ are indistinguishable. For instance, $x^2+1=0$ is true for both, $x^3+1=0$ is false for both. When we look at what properties they have through the real numbers, they are the "same" number. Any attempt to create something that identifies one, using just real numbers, will also identify the other. And yet clearly they are different numbers.



Similarly, for any linear operator $H$, we have that $langle-psi |H(-psi)rangle = langlepsi |Hpsirangle$. So any observable will give the same result for both states, and the states are in this sense "indistinguishable" and thus "the same". But clearly they're not actually the same state. One is $psi$ and the other is $-psi$. One of them, when added to $psi$, yields $2psi$, and the other one yields $0$. They are equivalent states (given a particular definition of "equivalent"), but they are not the same state.



As another analogy, if a copy of Earth out of anti-matter, then (putting aside symmetry violations), that planet would look like Earth. People would think the same way and do the same things as on the original Earth. These two Earths would, in terms of all these observations, be "the same". And yet they would not in fact be the same thing: put two actually identical Earths next to each other, and you have two identical Earths. Put an Earth and an anti-matter Earth next to each other, and you have a huge explosion.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    0












    $begingroup$

    $newcommandKet[1]left $
    You studied that if $|psirangle$ is a physical wavefunction, it must have permutation symmetry. This means that, if $hatP$ is the permutation operator, then $|psirangle$ must be an eigenfunction of the operator. So, $hatP|psirangle = pm |psirangle $. We define the wavefunctions that have the +1 eigenvalue as Bosons and that of -1 eigenvalue as Fermions.



    So, the wavefunctions that have + 1 eigenvalue are different from that of -1 eigenvalue.



    The wavefunction of a system determines all the properties of it, so naturally fermionic and bosonic systems would have different properties.



    Let me know if you want to know something specific that I haven't mentioned !






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Thank you for your answer! I am pretty sure I understand it now
      $endgroup$
      – Hightide
      Jun 7 at 14:46













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "151"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f484772%2fdifference-between-fermions-and-bosons-in-statistical-mechanics%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    6












    $begingroup$

    The main difference is more visible if you apply the permutation to some coordinates, say $x_1, x_2$ of the particles. These might be positions or spins or whatever you want, a property of the two particles where $x_1$ is the property of the particle $1$ and $x_2$ of the particle $2$. Let's work with the wave function $langle x_1, x_2|psirangle$ where we know, $hatP$ being self adjoint $$pmlangle x_1, x_2|psirangle=langle x_1, x_2|hatP|psirangle=langle x_2, x_1|psirangle$$
    Now consider the fermonic case, the one with a minus sign$$langle x_1, x_2|psirangle=-langle x_2, x_1|psirangle$$
    and look at the case $x_1=x_2=x$



    $$langle x, x|psirangle=-langle x, x|psirangle$$



    This clearly implies $langle x, x|psirangle=0$, lo and behold, two fermions can't be in the same quantum state! Bosons have no such problem, as there is no minus sign. This is the Pauli exclusion principle and it's the main "tangible" difference between bosons and fermions.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      I see, it truly is clearer if you work with wave functions. So the main difference is actually that the wave function that represents a system of fermions is different from the wave function representing a system of fermions (the first one being antisymmetric under permutation of 2 coordinates). However, the physical state of the system before and after the permutation is the same, as it should be, because the particles are identical!
      $endgroup$
      – Hightide
      Jun 7 at 10:25







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Yes, to put it more formally, choosing whether your wave functions are symmetric or antisymmetric divides your Hilbert space into two different 1D representations of the permutation group. Basically you "select" all the wave functions that are symmetric and you call them bosonic, same for antisymmetric and fermionic, but both these sets of wave functions have the property that their norm squared doesn't change under $S_N$. All the wave functions that don't belong in either category, you throw them away.
      $endgroup$
      – user2723984
      Jun 7 at 11:10











    • $begingroup$
      That was exactly the answer I needed. Thank you very much!
      $endgroup$
      – Hightide
      Jun 7 at 11:21















    6












    $begingroup$

    The main difference is more visible if you apply the permutation to some coordinates, say $x_1, x_2$ of the particles. These might be positions or spins or whatever you want, a property of the two particles where $x_1$ is the property of the particle $1$ and $x_2$ of the particle $2$. Let's work with the wave function $langle x_1, x_2|psirangle$ where we know, $hatP$ being self adjoint $$pmlangle x_1, x_2|psirangle=langle x_1, x_2|hatP|psirangle=langle x_2, x_1|psirangle$$
    Now consider the fermonic case, the one with a minus sign$$langle x_1, x_2|psirangle=-langle x_2, x_1|psirangle$$
    and look at the case $x_1=x_2=x$



    $$langle x, x|psirangle=-langle x, x|psirangle$$



    This clearly implies $langle x, x|psirangle=0$, lo and behold, two fermions can't be in the same quantum state! Bosons have no such problem, as there is no minus sign. This is the Pauli exclusion principle and it's the main "tangible" difference between bosons and fermions.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      I see, it truly is clearer if you work with wave functions. So the main difference is actually that the wave function that represents a system of fermions is different from the wave function representing a system of fermions (the first one being antisymmetric under permutation of 2 coordinates). However, the physical state of the system before and after the permutation is the same, as it should be, because the particles are identical!
      $endgroup$
      – Hightide
      Jun 7 at 10:25







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Yes, to put it more formally, choosing whether your wave functions are symmetric or antisymmetric divides your Hilbert space into two different 1D representations of the permutation group. Basically you "select" all the wave functions that are symmetric and you call them bosonic, same for antisymmetric and fermionic, but both these sets of wave functions have the property that their norm squared doesn't change under $S_N$. All the wave functions that don't belong in either category, you throw them away.
      $endgroup$
      – user2723984
      Jun 7 at 11:10











    • $begingroup$
      That was exactly the answer I needed. Thank you very much!
      $endgroup$
      – Hightide
      Jun 7 at 11:21













    6












    6








    6





    $begingroup$

    The main difference is more visible if you apply the permutation to some coordinates, say $x_1, x_2$ of the particles. These might be positions or spins or whatever you want, a property of the two particles where $x_1$ is the property of the particle $1$ and $x_2$ of the particle $2$. Let's work with the wave function $langle x_1, x_2|psirangle$ where we know, $hatP$ being self adjoint $$pmlangle x_1, x_2|psirangle=langle x_1, x_2|hatP|psirangle=langle x_2, x_1|psirangle$$
    Now consider the fermonic case, the one with a minus sign$$langle x_1, x_2|psirangle=-langle x_2, x_1|psirangle$$
    and look at the case $x_1=x_2=x$



    $$langle x, x|psirangle=-langle x, x|psirangle$$



    This clearly implies $langle x, x|psirangle=0$, lo and behold, two fermions can't be in the same quantum state! Bosons have no such problem, as there is no minus sign. This is the Pauli exclusion principle and it's the main "tangible" difference between bosons and fermions.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    The main difference is more visible if you apply the permutation to some coordinates, say $x_1, x_2$ of the particles. These might be positions or spins or whatever you want, a property of the two particles where $x_1$ is the property of the particle $1$ and $x_2$ of the particle $2$. Let's work with the wave function $langle x_1, x_2|psirangle$ where we know, $hatP$ being self adjoint $$pmlangle x_1, x_2|psirangle=langle x_1, x_2|hatP|psirangle=langle x_2, x_1|psirangle$$
    Now consider the fermonic case, the one with a minus sign$$langle x_1, x_2|psirangle=-langle x_2, x_1|psirangle$$
    and look at the case $x_1=x_2=x$



    $$langle x, x|psirangle=-langle x, x|psirangle$$



    This clearly implies $langle x, x|psirangle=0$, lo and behold, two fermions can't be in the same quantum state! Bosons have no such problem, as there is no minus sign. This is the Pauli exclusion principle and it's the main "tangible" difference between bosons and fermions.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Jun 7 at 9:54









    user2723984user2723984

    9004 silver badges18 bronze badges




    9004 silver badges18 bronze badges











    • $begingroup$
      I see, it truly is clearer if you work with wave functions. So the main difference is actually that the wave function that represents a system of fermions is different from the wave function representing a system of fermions (the first one being antisymmetric under permutation of 2 coordinates). However, the physical state of the system before and after the permutation is the same, as it should be, because the particles are identical!
      $endgroup$
      – Hightide
      Jun 7 at 10:25







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Yes, to put it more formally, choosing whether your wave functions are symmetric or antisymmetric divides your Hilbert space into two different 1D representations of the permutation group. Basically you "select" all the wave functions that are symmetric and you call them bosonic, same for antisymmetric and fermionic, but both these sets of wave functions have the property that their norm squared doesn't change under $S_N$. All the wave functions that don't belong in either category, you throw them away.
      $endgroup$
      – user2723984
      Jun 7 at 11:10











    • $begingroup$
      That was exactly the answer I needed. Thank you very much!
      $endgroup$
      – Hightide
      Jun 7 at 11:21
















    • $begingroup$
      I see, it truly is clearer if you work with wave functions. So the main difference is actually that the wave function that represents a system of fermions is different from the wave function representing a system of fermions (the first one being antisymmetric under permutation of 2 coordinates). However, the physical state of the system before and after the permutation is the same, as it should be, because the particles are identical!
      $endgroup$
      – Hightide
      Jun 7 at 10:25







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Yes, to put it more formally, choosing whether your wave functions are symmetric or antisymmetric divides your Hilbert space into two different 1D representations of the permutation group. Basically you "select" all the wave functions that are symmetric and you call them bosonic, same for antisymmetric and fermionic, but both these sets of wave functions have the property that their norm squared doesn't change under $S_N$. All the wave functions that don't belong in either category, you throw them away.
      $endgroup$
      – user2723984
      Jun 7 at 11:10











    • $begingroup$
      That was exactly the answer I needed. Thank you very much!
      $endgroup$
      – Hightide
      Jun 7 at 11:21















    $begingroup$
    I see, it truly is clearer if you work with wave functions. So the main difference is actually that the wave function that represents a system of fermions is different from the wave function representing a system of fermions (the first one being antisymmetric under permutation of 2 coordinates). However, the physical state of the system before and after the permutation is the same, as it should be, because the particles are identical!
    $endgroup$
    – Hightide
    Jun 7 at 10:25





    $begingroup$
    I see, it truly is clearer if you work with wave functions. So the main difference is actually that the wave function that represents a system of fermions is different from the wave function representing a system of fermions (the first one being antisymmetric under permutation of 2 coordinates). However, the physical state of the system before and after the permutation is the same, as it should be, because the particles are identical!
    $endgroup$
    – Hightide
    Jun 7 at 10:25





    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    Yes, to put it more formally, choosing whether your wave functions are symmetric or antisymmetric divides your Hilbert space into two different 1D representations of the permutation group. Basically you "select" all the wave functions that are symmetric and you call them bosonic, same for antisymmetric and fermionic, but both these sets of wave functions have the property that their norm squared doesn't change under $S_N$. All the wave functions that don't belong in either category, you throw them away.
    $endgroup$
    – user2723984
    Jun 7 at 11:10





    $begingroup$
    Yes, to put it more formally, choosing whether your wave functions are symmetric or antisymmetric divides your Hilbert space into two different 1D representations of the permutation group. Basically you "select" all the wave functions that are symmetric and you call them bosonic, same for antisymmetric and fermionic, but both these sets of wave functions have the property that their norm squared doesn't change under $S_N$. All the wave functions that don't belong in either category, you throw them away.
    $endgroup$
    – user2723984
    Jun 7 at 11:10













    $begingroup$
    That was exactly the answer I needed. Thank you very much!
    $endgroup$
    – Hightide
    Jun 7 at 11:21




    $begingroup$
    That was exactly the answer I needed. Thank you very much!
    $endgroup$
    – Hightide
    Jun 7 at 11:21













    2












    $begingroup$


    (to be specific |ψ⟩ and −|ψ⟩ are the same state).




    Err... yes and no. As analogy, consider the numbers $i$ and $-i$. Whenever you have a function expressed in terms of real numbers, $i$ and $-i$ are indistinguishable. For instance, $x^2+1=0$ is true for both, $x^3+1=0$ is false for both. When we look at what properties they have through the real numbers, they are the "same" number. Any attempt to create something that identifies one, using just real numbers, will also identify the other. And yet clearly they are different numbers.



    Similarly, for any linear operator $H$, we have that $langle-psi |H(-psi)rangle = langlepsi |Hpsirangle$. So any observable will give the same result for both states, and the states are in this sense "indistinguishable" and thus "the same". But clearly they're not actually the same state. One is $psi$ and the other is $-psi$. One of them, when added to $psi$, yields $2psi$, and the other one yields $0$. They are equivalent states (given a particular definition of "equivalent"), but they are not the same state.



    As another analogy, if a copy of Earth out of anti-matter, then (putting aside symmetry violations), that planet would look like Earth. People would think the same way and do the same things as on the original Earth. These two Earths would, in terms of all these observations, be "the same". And yet they would not in fact be the same thing: put two actually identical Earths next to each other, and you have two identical Earths. Put an Earth and an anti-matter Earth next to each other, and you have a huge explosion.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      2












      $begingroup$


      (to be specific |ψ⟩ and −|ψ⟩ are the same state).




      Err... yes and no. As analogy, consider the numbers $i$ and $-i$. Whenever you have a function expressed in terms of real numbers, $i$ and $-i$ are indistinguishable. For instance, $x^2+1=0$ is true for both, $x^3+1=0$ is false for both. When we look at what properties they have through the real numbers, they are the "same" number. Any attempt to create something that identifies one, using just real numbers, will also identify the other. And yet clearly they are different numbers.



      Similarly, for any linear operator $H$, we have that $langle-psi |H(-psi)rangle = langlepsi |Hpsirangle$. So any observable will give the same result for both states, and the states are in this sense "indistinguishable" and thus "the same". But clearly they're not actually the same state. One is $psi$ and the other is $-psi$. One of them, when added to $psi$, yields $2psi$, and the other one yields $0$. They are equivalent states (given a particular definition of "equivalent"), but they are not the same state.



      As another analogy, if a copy of Earth out of anti-matter, then (putting aside symmetry violations), that planet would look like Earth. People would think the same way and do the same things as on the original Earth. These two Earths would, in terms of all these observations, be "the same". And yet they would not in fact be the same thing: put two actually identical Earths next to each other, and you have two identical Earths. Put an Earth and an anti-matter Earth next to each other, and you have a huge explosion.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$


        (to be specific |ψ⟩ and −|ψ⟩ are the same state).




        Err... yes and no. As analogy, consider the numbers $i$ and $-i$. Whenever you have a function expressed in terms of real numbers, $i$ and $-i$ are indistinguishable. For instance, $x^2+1=0$ is true for both, $x^3+1=0$ is false for both. When we look at what properties they have through the real numbers, they are the "same" number. Any attempt to create something that identifies one, using just real numbers, will also identify the other. And yet clearly they are different numbers.



        Similarly, for any linear operator $H$, we have that $langle-psi |H(-psi)rangle = langlepsi |Hpsirangle$. So any observable will give the same result for both states, and the states are in this sense "indistinguishable" and thus "the same". But clearly they're not actually the same state. One is $psi$ and the other is $-psi$. One of them, when added to $psi$, yields $2psi$, and the other one yields $0$. They are equivalent states (given a particular definition of "equivalent"), but they are not the same state.



        As another analogy, if a copy of Earth out of anti-matter, then (putting aside symmetry violations), that planet would look like Earth. People would think the same way and do the same things as on the original Earth. These two Earths would, in terms of all these observations, be "the same". And yet they would not in fact be the same thing: put two actually identical Earths next to each other, and you have two identical Earths. Put an Earth and an anti-matter Earth next to each other, and you have a huge explosion.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$




        (to be specific |ψ⟩ and −|ψ⟩ are the same state).




        Err... yes and no. As analogy, consider the numbers $i$ and $-i$. Whenever you have a function expressed in terms of real numbers, $i$ and $-i$ are indistinguishable. For instance, $x^2+1=0$ is true for both, $x^3+1=0$ is false for both. When we look at what properties they have through the real numbers, they are the "same" number. Any attempt to create something that identifies one, using just real numbers, will also identify the other. And yet clearly they are different numbers.



        Similarly, for any linear operator $H$, we have that $langle-psi |H(-psi)rangle = langlepsi |Hpsirangle$. So any observable will give the same result for both states, and the states are in this sense "indistinguishable" and thus "the same". But clearly they're not actually the same state. One is $psi$ and the other is $-psi$. One of them, when added to $psi$, yields $2psi$, and the other one yields $0$. They are equivalent states (given a particular definition of "equivalent"), but they are not the same state.



        As another analogy, if a copy of Earth out of anti-matter, then (putting aside symmetry violations), that planet would look like Earth. People would think the same way and do the same things as on the original Earth. These two Earths would, in terms of all these observations, be "the same". And yet they would not in fact be the same thing: put two actually identical Earths next to each other, and you have two identical Earths. Put an Earth and an anti-matter Earth next to each other, and you have a huge explosion.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jun 7 at 18:52









        AcccumulationAcccumulation

        4,0637 silver badges16 bronze badges




        4,0637 silver badges16 bronze badges





















            0












            $begingroup$

            $newcommandKet[1]left $
            You studied that if $|psirangle$ is a physical wavefunction, it must have permutation symmetry. This means that, if $hatP$ is the permutation operator, then $|psirangle$ must be an eigenfunction of the operator. So, $hatP|psirangle = pm |psirangle $. We define the wavefunctions that have the +1 eigenvalue as Bosons and that of -1 eigenvalue as Fermions.



            So, the wavefunctions that have + 1 eigenvalue are different from that of -1 eigenvalue.



            The wavefunction of a system determines all the properties of it, so naturally fermionic and bosonic systems would have different properties.



            Let me know if you want to know something specific that I haven't mentioned !






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for your answer! I am pretty sure I understand it now
              $endgroup$
              – Hightide
              Jun 7 at 14:46















            0












            $begingroup$

            $newcommandKet[1]left $
            You studied that if $|psirangle$ is a physical wavefunction, it must have permutation symmetry. This means that, if $hatP$ is the permutation operator, then $|psirangle$ must be an eigenfunction of the operator. So, $hatP|psirangle = pm |psirangle $. We define the wavefunctions that have the +1 eigenvalue as Bosons and that of -1 eigenvalue as Fermions.



            So, the wavefunctions that have + 1 eigenvalue are different from that of -1 eigenvalue.



            The wavefunction of a system determines all the properties of it, so naturally fermionic and bosonic systems would have different properties.



            Let me know if you want to know something specific that I haven't mentioned !






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for your answer! I am pretty sure I understand it now
              $endgroup$
              – Hightide
              Jun 7 at 14:46













            0












            0








            0





            $begingroup$

            $newcommandKet[1]left $
            You studied that if $|psirangle$ is a physical wavefunction, it must have permutation symmetry. This means that, if $hatP$ is the permutation operator, then $|psirangle$ must be an eigenfunction of the operator. So, $hatP|psirangle = pm |psirangle $. We define the wavefunctions that have the +1 eigenvalue as Bosons and that of -1 eigenvalue as Fermions.



            So, the wavefunctions that have + 1 eigenvalue are different from that of -1 eigenvalue.



            The wavefunction of a system determines all the properties of it, so naturally fermionic and bosonic systems would have different properties.



            Let me know if you want to know something specific that I haven't mentioned !






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            $newcommandKet[1]left $
            You studied that if $|psirangle$ is a physical wavefunction, it must have permutation symmetry. This means that, if $hatP$ is the permutation operator, then $|psirangle$ must be an eigenfunction of the operator. So, $hatP|psirangle = pm |psirangle $. We define the wavefunctions that have the +1 eigenvalue as Bosons and that of -1 eigenvalue as Fermions.



            So, the wavefunctions that have + 1 eigenvalue are different from that of -1 eigenvalue.



            The wavefunction of a system determines all the properties of it, so naturally fermionic and bosonic systems would have different properties.



            Let me know if you want to know something specific that I haven't mentioned !







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Jun 7 at 14:06









            Sparsh MishraSparsh Mishra

            985 bronze badges




            985 bronze badges











            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for your answer! I am pretty sure I understand it now
              $endgroup$
              – Hightide
              Jun 7 at 14:46
















            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for your answer! I am pretty sure I understand it now
              $endgroup$
              – Hightide
              Jun 7 at 14:46















            $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer! I am pretty sure I understand it now
            $endgroup$
            – Hightide
            Jun 7 at 14:46




            $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer! I am pretty sure I understand it now
            $endgroup$
            – Hightide
            Jun 7 at 14:46

















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f484772%2fdifference-between-fermions-and-bosons-in-statistical-mechanics%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Club Baloncesto Breogán Índice Historia | Pavillón | Nome | O Breogán na cultura popular | Xogadores | Adestradores | Presidentes | Palmarés | Historial | Líderes | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióncbbreogan.galCadroGuía oficial da ACB 2009-10, páxina 201Guía oficial ACB 1992, páxina 183. Editorial DB.É de 6.500 espectadores sentados axeitándose á última normativa"Estudiantes Junior, entre as mellores canteiras"o orixinalHemeroteca El Mundo Deportivo, 16 setembro de 1970, páxina 12Historia do BreogánAlfredo Pérez, o último canoneiroHistoria C.B. BreogánHemeroteca de El Mundo DeportivoJimmy Wright, norteamericano do Breogán deixará Lugo por ameazas de morteResultados de Breogán en 1986-87Resultados de Breogán en 1990-91Ficha de Velimir Perasović en acb.comResultados de Breogán en 1994-95Breogán arrasa al Barça. "El Mundo Deportivo", 27 de setembro de 1999, páxina 58CB Breogán - FC BarcelonaA FEB invita a participar nunha nova Liga EuropeaCharlie Bell na prensa estatalMáximos anotadores 2005Tempada 2005-06 : Tódolos Xogadores da Xornada""Non quero pensar nunha man negra, mais pregúntome que está a pasar""o orixinalRaúl López, orgulloso dos xogadores, presume da boa saúde económica do BreogánJulio González confirma que cesa como presidente del BreogánHomenaxe a Lisardo GómezA tempada do rexurdimento celesteEntrevista a Lisardo GómezEl COB dinamita el Pazo para forzar el quinto (69-73)Cafés Candelas, patrocinador del CB Breogán"Suso Lázare, novo presidente do Breogán"o orixinalCafés Candelas Breogán firma el mayor triunfo de la historiaEl Breogán realizará 17 homenajes por su cincuenta aniversario"O Breogán honra ao seu fundador e primeiro presidente"o orixinalMiguel Giao recibiu a homenaxe do PazoHomenaxe aos primeiros gladiadores celestesO home que nos amosa como ver o Breo co corazónTita Franco será homenaxeada polos #50anosdeBreoJulio Vila recibirá unha homenaxe in memoriam polos #50anosdeBreo"O Breogán homenaxeará aos seus aboados máis veteráns"Pechada ovación a «Capi» Sanmartín e Ricardo «Corazón de González»Homenaxe por décadas de informaciónPaco García volve ao Pazo con motivo do 50 aniversario"Resultados y clasificaciones""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, campión da Copa Princesa""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, equipo ACB"C.B. Breogán"Proxecto social"o orixinal"Centros asociados"o orixinalFicha en imdb.comMario Camus trata la recuperación del amor en 'La vieja música', su última película"Páxina web oficial""Club Baloncesto Breogán""C. B. Breogán S.A.D."eehttp://www.fegaba.com

            Vilaño, A Laracha Índice Patrimonio | Lugares e parroquias | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación43°14′52″N 8°36′03″O / 43.24775, -8.60070

            Cegueira Índice Epidemioloxía | Deficiencia visual | Tipos de cegueira | Principais causas de cegueira | Tratamento | Técnicas de adaptación e axudas | Vida dos cegos | Primeiros auxilios | Crenzas respecto das persoas cegas | Crenzas das persoas cegas | O neno deficiente visual | Aspectos psicolóxicos da cegueira | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación54.054.154.436928256blindnessDicionario da Real Academia GalegaPortal das Palabras"International Standards: Visual Standards — Aspects and Ranges of Vision Loss with Emphasis on Population Surveys.""Visual impairment and blindness""Presentan un plan para previr a cegueira"o orixinalACCDV Associació Catalana de Cecs i Disminuïts Visuals - PMFTrachoma"Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis"1844137110.1056/NEJMoa0802268Cans guía - os mellores amigos dos cegosArquivadoEscola de cans guía para cegos en Mortágua, PortugalArquivado"Tecnología para ciegos y deficientes visuales. Recopilación de recursos gratuitos en la Red""Colorino""‘COL.diesis’, escuchar los sonidos del color""COL.diesis: Transforming Colour into Melody and Implementing the Result in a Colour Sensor Device"o orixinal"Sistema de desarrollo de sinestesia color-sonido para invidentes utilizando un protocolo de audio""Enseñanza táctil - geometría y color. Juegos didácticos para niños ciegos y videntes""Sistema Constanz"L'ocupació laboral dels cecs a l'Estat espanyol està pràcticament equiparada a la de les persones amb visió, entrevista amb Pedro ZuritaONCE (Organización Nacional de Cegos de España)Prevención da cegueiraDescrición de deficiencias visuais (Disc@pnet)Braillín, un boneco atractivo para calquera neno, con ou sen discapacidade, que permite familiarizarse co sistema de escritura e lectura brailleAxudas Técnicas36838ID00897494007150-90057129528256DOID:1432HP:0000618D001766C10.597.751.941.162C97109C0155020