Difference between fermions and bosons in Statistical MechanicsIgnorance in statistical mechanicsIs there a Lagrangian formulation of statistical mechanics?Fermion vs. Bosons and particle vs. wave: is there a link?Geometry, Group Theory, and Statistical MechanicsDensity matrix in Quantum Statistical MechanicsNon coherence of Fermions and Bosons through $U(1)$Different postulates and statistical interpreations of quantum mechanicsWhy are composite fermions either bosons or fermions but not neither?What is special about the indistinguishability of Boson and Fermions?System of particles in classical mechanics and classical statistical mechanics

Can’t attend PhD conferences

Smooth Julia set for quadratic polynomials

Does the posterior necessarily follow the same conditional dependence structure as the prior?

Do flight schools typically have dress codes or expectations?

Did Karl Marx ever use any example that involved cotton and dollars to illustrate the way capital and surplus value were generated?

Why is there no havdallah when going from Yom Tov into Shabbat?

Abel-Jacobi map on symmetric product of genus 4 curve

Is there any set of 2-6 notes that doesn't have a chord name?

How to determine what is the correct level of detail when modelling?

In the Marvel universe, can a human have a baby with any non-human?

Does ultrasonic bath cleaning damage laboratory volumetric glassware calibration?

MH370 blackbox - is it still possible to retrieve data from it?

When is the original BFGS algorithm still better than the Limited-Memory version?

Why is C++ initial allocation so much larger than C's?

How to split an equation over two lines?

How to get cool night-vision without lame drawbacks?

What is the line crossing the Pacific Ocean that is shown on maps?

Using “sparkling” as a diminutive of “spark” in a poem

What sort of mathematical problems are there in AI that people are working on?

Is it damaging to turn off a small fridge for two days every week?

Impossible darts scores

What do you call a weak person's act of taking on bigger opponents?

How to perform Login Authentication at the client-side?

What are the penalties for overstaying in USA?



Difference between fermions and bosons in Statistical Mechanics


Ignorance in statistical mechanicsIs there a Lagrangian formulation of statistical mechanics?Fermion vs. Bosons and particle vs. wave: is there a link?Geometry, Group Theory, and Statistical MechanicsDensity matrix in Quantum Statistical MechanicsNon coherence of Fermions and Bosons through $U(1)$Different postulates and statistical interpreations of quantum mechanicsWhy are composite fermions either bosons or fermions but not neither?What is special about the indistinguishability of Boson and Fermions?System of particles in classical mechanics and classical statistical mechanics






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3












$begingroup$


I am an undergraduate student in Physics and Mathematics. I am now preaparing for my final exam in Statistical Mechanics and I would like some help in a particular point. So here it goes:



In the introductory course of Quantum Mechanics we have discussed how a global phase does not affect the physical state of the system (to be specific $|psirangle$ and $-|psirangle$ are the same state).



However, in the course of Statistical Mechanics, we predicted the existence of fermions and bosons by applying an elementary permutation of two particles
and seeing that the only possibilities are $hatP|psirangle = pm |psirangle$



What I have trouble understanding is that if the state is the same after the permutation, why do the particles have such a different behaviour.



Attempt at solution:



In my head, the way this could work is that indeed $|psirangle$ and $-|psirangle$ are the same state but the behaviour of the wave function (symmetric or antisymmetric with respect to particle interchange) is what determines if the system is a fermionic or a bosonic.



I am aware that the question is a bit wishy-washy, but I have been looking around in different sources and no one seems to adress this particular concern.



Any help or comments are appreciated



(PS: This is my first question ever, so any tips in question formulation are also welcome)










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Be careful in thinking of phase as arbitrary. There is only one arbitrary phase in an entire system. In systems of more than one particle the second and subsequent particles have a meaningful phase difference relative the first one.
    $endgroup$
    – dmckee
    Jun 7 at 18:40










  • $begingroup$
    @dmckee That seems like an answer, rather than a comment. :-)
    $endgroup$
    – rob
    Jun 8 at 17:53

















3












$begingroup$


I am an undergraduate student in Physics and Mathematics. I am now preaparing for my final exam in Statistical Mechanics and I would like some help in a particular point. So here it goes:



In the introductory course of Quantum Mechanics we have discussed how a global phase does not affect the physical state of the system (to be specific $|psirangle$ and $-|psirangle$ are the same state).



However, in the course of Statistical Mechanics, we predicted the existence of fermions and bosons by applying an elementary permutation of two particles
and seeing that the only possibilities are $hatP|psirangle = pm |psirangle$



What I have trouble understanding is that if the state is the same after the permutation, why do the particles have such a different behaviour.



Attempt at solution:



In my head, the way this could work is that indeed $|psirangle$ and $-|psirangle$ are the same state but the behaviour of the wave function (symmetric or antisymmetric with respect to particle interchange) is what determines if the system is a fermionic or a bosonic.



I am aware that the question is a bit wishy-washy, but I have been looking around in different sources and no one seems to adress this particular concern.



Any help or comments are appreciated



(PS: This is my first question ever, so any tips in question formulation are also welcome)










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Be careful in thinking of phase as arbitrary. There is only one arbitrary phase in an entire system. In systems of more than one particle the second and subsequent particles have a meaningful phase difference relative the first one.
    $endgroup$
    – dmckee
    Jun 7 at 18:40










  • $begingroup$
    @dmckee That seems like an answer, rather than a comment. :-)
    $endgroup$
    – rob
    Jun 8 at 17:53













3












3








3





$begingroup$


I am an undergraduate student in Physics and Mathematics. I am now preaparing for my final exam in Statistical Mechanics and I would like some help in a particular point. So here it goes:



In the introductory course of Quantum Mechanics we have discussed how a global phase does not affect the physical state of the system (to be specific $|psirangle$ and $-|psirangle$ are the same state).



However, in the course of Statistical Mechanics, we predicted the existence of fermions and bosons by applying an elementary permutation of two particles
and seeing that the only possibilities are $hatP|psirangle = pm |psirangle$



What I have trouble understanding is that if the state is the same after the permutation, why do the particles have such a different behaviour.



Attempt at solution:



In my head, the way this could work is that indeed $|psirangle$ and $-|psirangle$ are the same state but the behaviour of the wave function (symmetric or antisymmetric with respect to particle interchange) is what determines if the system is a fermionic or a bosonic.



I am aware that the question is a bit wishy-washy, but I have been looking around in different sources and no one seems to adress this particular concern.



Any help or comments are appreciated



(PS: This is my first question ever, so any tips in question formulation are also welcome)










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I am an undergraduate student in Physics and Mathematics. I am now preaparing for my final exam in Statistical Mechanics and I would like some help in a particular point. So here it goes:



In the introductory course of Quantum Mechanics we have discussed how a global phase does not affect the physical state of the system (to be specific $|psirangle$ and $-|psirangle$ are the same state).



However, in the course of Statistical Mechanics, we predicted the existence of fermions and bosons by applying an elementary permutation of two particles
and seeing that the only possibilities are $hatP|psirangle = pm |psirangle$



What I have trouble understanding is that if the state is the same after the permutation, why do the particles have such a different behaviour.



Attempt at solution:



In my head, the way this could work is that indeed $|psirangle$ and $-|psirangle$ are the same state but the behaviour of the wave function (symmetric or antisymmetric with respect to particle interchange) is what determines if the system is a fermionic or a bosonic.



I am aware that the question is a bit wishy-washy, but I have been looking around in different sources and no one seems to adress this particular concern.



Any help or comments are appreciated



(PS: This is my first question ever, so any tips in question formulation are also welcome)







quantum-mechanics statistical-mechanics fermions bosons






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jun 7 at 9:18









HightideHightide

183 bronze badges




183 bronze badges







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Be careful in thinking of phase as arbitrary. There is only one arbitrary phase in an entire system. In systems of more than one particle the second and subsequent particles have a meaningful phase difference relative the first one.
    $endgroup$
    – dmckee
    Jun 7 at 18:40










  • $begingroup$
    @dmckee That seems like an answer, rather than a comment. :-)
    $endgroup$
    – rob
    Jun 8 at 17:53












  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Be careful in thinking of phase as arbitrary. There is only one arbitrary phase in an entire system. In systems of more than one particle the second and subsequent particles have a meaningful phase difference relative the first one.
    $endgroup$
    – dmckee
    Jun 7 at 18:40










  • $begingroup$
    @dmckee That seems like an answer, rather than a comment. :-)
    $endgroup$
    – rob
    Jun 8 at 17:53







4




4




$begingroup$
Be careful in thinking of phase as arbitrary. There is only one arbitrary phase in an entire system. In systems of more than one particle the second and subsequent particles have a meaningful phase difference relative the first one.
$endgroup$
– dmckee
Jun 7 at 18:40




$begingroup$
Be careful in thinking of phase as arbitrary. There is only one arbitrary phase in an entire system. In systems of more than one particle the second and subsequent particles have a meaningful phase difference relative the first one.
$endgroup$
– dmckee
Jun 7 at 18:40












$begingroup$
@dmckee That seems like an answer, rather than a comment. :-)
$endgroup$
– rob
Jun 8 at 17:53




$begingroup$
@dmckee That seems like an answer, rather than a comment. :-)
$endgroup$
– rob
Jun 8 at 17:53










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

The main difference is more visible if you apply the permutation to some coordinates, say $x_1, x_2$ of the particles. These might be positions or spins or whatever you want, a property of the two particles where $x_1$ is the property of the particle $1$ and $x_2$ of the particle $2$. Let's work with the wave function $langle x_1, x_2|psirangle$ where we know, $hatP$ being self adjoint $$pmlangle x_1, x_2|psirangle=langle x_1, x_2|hatP|psirangle=langle x_2, x_1|psirangle$$
Now consider the fermonic case, the one with a minus sign$$langle x_1, x_2|psirangle=-langle x_2, x_1|psirangle$$
and look at the case $x_1=x_2=x$



$$langle x, x|psirangle=-langle x, x|psirangle$$



This clearly implies $langle x, x|psirangle=0$, lo and behold, two fermions can't be in the same quantum state! Bosons have no such problem, as there is no minus sign. This is the Pauli exclusion principle and it's the main "tangible" difference between bosons and fermions.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I see, it truly is clearer if you work with wave functions. So the main difference is actually that the wave function that represents a system of fermions is different from the wave function representing a system of fermions (the first one being antisymmetric under permutation of 2 coordinates). However, the physical state of the system before and after the permutation is the same, as it should be, because the particles are identical!
    $endgroup$
    – Hightide
    Jun 7 at 10:25







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes, to put it more formally, choosing whether your wave functions are symmetric or antisymmetric divides your Hilbert space into two different 1D representations of the permutation group. Basically you "select" all the wave functions that are symmetric and you call them bosonic, same for antisymmetric and fermionic, but both these sets of wave functions have the property that their norm squared doesn't change under $S_N$. All the wave functions that don't belong in either category, you throw them away.
    $endgroup$
    – user2723984
    Jun 7 at 11:10











  • $begingroup$
    That was exactly the answer I needed. Thank you very much!
    $endgroup$
    – Hightide
    Jun 7 at 11:21


















2












$begingroup$


(to be specific |ψ⟩ and −|ψ⟩ are the same state).




Err... yes and no. As analogy, consider the numbers $i$ and $-i$. Whenever you have a function expressed in terms of real numbers, $i$ and $-i$ are indistinguishable. For instance, $x^2+1=0$ is true for both, $x^3+1=0$ is false for both. When we look at what properties they have through the real numbers, they are the "same" number. Any attempt to create something that identifies one, using just real numbers, will also identify the other. And yet clearly they are different numbers.



Similarly, for any linear operator $H$, we have that $langle-psi |H(-psi)rangle = langlepsi |Hpsirangle$. So any observable will give the same result for both states, and the states are in this sense "indistinguishable" and thus "the same". But clearly they're not actually the same state. One is $psi$ and the other is $-psi$. One of them, when added to $psi$, yields $2psi$, and the other one yields $0$. They are equivalent states (given a particular definition of "equivalent"), but they are not the same state.



As another analogy, if a copy of Earth out of anti-matter, then (putting aside symmetry violations), that planet would look like Earth. People would think the same way and do the same things as on the original Earth. These two Earths would, in terms of all these observations, be "the same". And yet they would not in fact be the same thing: put two actually identical Earths next to each other, and you have two identical Earths. Put an Earth and an anti-matter Earth next to each other, and you have a huge explosion.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    0












    $begingroup$

    $newcommandKet[1]left $
    You studied that if $|psirangle$ is a physical wavefunction, it must have permutation symmetry. This means that, if $hatP$ is the permutation operator, then $|psirangle$ must be an eigenfunction of the operator. So, $hatP|psirangle = pm |psirangle $. We define the wavefunctions that have the +1 eigenvalue as Bosons and that of -1 eigenvalue as Fermions.



    So, the wavefunctions that have + 1 eigenvalue are different from that of -1 eigenvalue.



    The wavefunction of a system determines all the properties of it, so naturally fermionic and bosonic systems would have different properties.



    Let me know if you want to know something specific that I haven't mentioned !






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Thank you for your answer! I am pretty sure I understand it now
      $endgroup$
      – Hightide
      Jun 7 at 14:46













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "151"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f484772%2fdifference-between-fermions-and-bosons-in-statistical-mechanics%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    6












    $begingroup$

    The main difference is more visible if you apply the permutation to some coordinates, say $x_1, x_2$ of the particles. These might be positions or spins or whatever you want, a property of the two particles where $x_1$ is the property of the particle $1$ and $x_2$ of the particle $2$. Let's work with the wave function $langle x_1, x_2|psirangle$ where we know, $hatP$ being self adjoint $$pmlangle x_1, x_2|psirangle=langle x_1, x_2|hatP|psirangle=langle x_2, x_1|psirangle$$
    Now consider the fermonic case, the one with a minus sign$$langle x_1, x_2|psirangle=-langle x_2, x_1|psirangle$$
    and look at the case $x_1=x_2=x$



    $$langle x, x|psirangle=-langle x, x|psirangle$$



    This clearly implies $langle x, x|psirangle=0$, lo and behold, two fermions can't be in the same quantum state! Bosons have no such problem, as there is no minus sign. This is the Pauli exclusion principle and it's the main "tangible" difference between bosons and fermions.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      I see, it truly is clearer if you work with wave functions. So the main difference is actually that the wave function that represents a system of fermions is different from the wave function representing a system of fermions (the first one being antisymmetric under permutation of 2 coordinates). However, the physical state of the system before and after the permutation is the same, as it should be, because the particles are identical!
      $endgroup$
      – Hightide
      Jun 7 at 10:25







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Yes, to put it more formally, choosing whether your wave functions are symmetric or antisymmetric divides your Hilbert space into two different 1D representations of the permutation group. Basically you "select" all the wave functions that are symmetric and you call them bosonic, same for antisymmetric and fermionic, but both these sets of wave functions have the property that their norm squared doesn't change under $S_N$. All the wave functions that don't belong in either category, you throw them away.
      $endgroup$
      – user2723984
      Jun 7 at 11:10











    • $begingroup$
      That was exactly the answer I needed. Thank you very much!
      $endgroup$
      – Hightide
      Jun 7 at 11:21















    6












    $begingroup$

    The main difference is more visible if you apply the permutation to some coordinates, say $x_1, x_2$ of the particles. These might be positions or spins or whatever you want, a property of the two particles where $x_1$ is the property of the particle $1$ and $x_2$ of the particle $2$. Let's work with the wave function $langle x_1, x_2|psirangle$ where we know, $hatP$ being self adjoint $$pmlangle x_1, x_2|psirangle=langle x_1, x_2|hatP|psirangle=langle x_2, x_1|psirangle$$
    Now consider the fermonic case, the one with a minus sign$$langle x_1, x_2|psirangle=-langle x_2, x_1|psirangle$$
    and look at the case $x_1=x_2=x$



    $$langle x, x|psirangle=-langle x, x|psirangle$$



    This clearly implies $langle x, x|psirangle=0$, lo and behold, two fermions can't be in the same quantum state! Bosons have no such problem, as there is no minus sign. This is the Pauli exclusion principle and it's the main "tangible" difference between bosons and fermions.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      I see, it truly is clearer if you work with wave functions. So the main difference is actually that the wave function that represents a system of fermions is different from the wave function representing a system of fermions (the first one being antisymmetric under permutation of 2 coordinates). However, the physical state of the system before and after the permutation is the same, as it should be, because the particles are identical!
      $endgroup$
      – Hightide
      Jun 7 at 10:25







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Yes, to put it more formally, choosing whether your wave functions are symmetric or antisymmetric divides your Hilbert space into two different 1D representations of the permutation group. Basically you "select" all the wave functions that are symmetric and you call them bosonic, same for antisymmetric and fermionic, but both these sets of wave functions have the property that their norm squared doesn't change under $S_N$. All the wave functions that don't belong in either category, you throw them away.
      $endgroup$
      – user2723984
      Jun 7 at 11:10











    • $begingroup$
      That was exactly the answer I needed. Thank you very much!
      $endgroup$
      – Hightide
      Jun 7 at 11:21













    6












    6








    6





    $begingroup$

    The main difference is more visible if you apply the permutation to some coordinates, say $x_1, x_2$ of the particles. These might be positions or spins or whatever you want, a property of the two particles where $x_1$ is the property of the particle $1$ and $x_2$ of the particle $2$. Let's work with the wave function $langle x_1, x_2|psirangle$ where we know, $hatP$ being self adjoint $$pmlangle x_1, x_2|psirangle=langle x_1, x_2|hatP|psirangle=langle x_2, x_1|psirangle$$
    Now consider the fermonic case, the one with a minus sign$$langle x_1, x_2|psirangle=-langle x_2, x_1|psirangle$$
    and look at the case $x_1=x_2=x$



    $$langle x, x|psirangle=-langle x, x|psirangle$$



    This clearly implies $langle x, x|psirangle=0$, lo and behold, two fermions can't be in the same quantum state! Bosons have no such problem, as there is no minus sign. This is the Pauli exclusion principle and it's the main "tangible" difference between bosons and fermions.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    The main difference is more visible if you apply the permutation to some coordinates, say $x_1, x_2$ of the particles. These might be positions or spins or whatever you want, a property of the two particles where $x_1$ is the property of the particle $1$ and $x_2$ of the particle $2$. Let's work with the wave function $langle x_1, x_2|psirangle$ where we know, $hatP$ being self adjoint $$pmlangle x_1, x_2|psirangle=langle x_1, x_2|hatP|psirangle=langle x_2, x_1|psirangle$$
    Now consider the fermonic case, the one with a minus sign$$langle x_1, x_2|psirangle=-langle x_2, x_1|psirangle$$
    and look at the case $x_1=x_2=x$



    $$langle x, x|psirangle=-langle x, x|psirangle$$



    This clearly implies $langle x, x|psirangle=0$, lo and behold, two fermions can't be in the same quantum state! Bosons have no such problem, as there is no minus sign. This is the Pauli exclusion principle and it's the main "tangible" difference between bosons and fermions.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Jun 7 at 9:54









    user2723984user2723984

    9004 silver badges18 bronze badges




    9004 silver badges18 bronze badges











    • $begingroup$
      I see, it truly is clearer if you work with wave functions. So the main difference is actually that the wave function that represents a system of fermions is different from the wave function representing a system of fermions (the first one being antisymmetric under permutation of 2 coordinates). However, the physical state of the system before and after the permutation is the same, as it should be, because the particles are identical!
      $endgroup$
      – Hightide
      Jun 7 at 10:25







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Yes, to put it more formally, choosing whether your wave functions are symmetric or antisymmetric divides your Hilbert space into two different 1D representations of the permutation group. Basically you "select" all the wave functions that are symmetric and you call them bosonic, same for antisymmetric and fermionic, but both these sets of wave functions have the property that their norm squared doesn't change under $S_N$. All the wave functions that don't belong in either category, you throw them away.
      $endgroup$
      – user2723984
      Jun 7 at 11:10











    • $begingroup$
      That was exactly the answer I needed. Thank you very much!
      $endgroup$
      – Hightide
      Jun 7 at 11:21
















    • $begingroup$
      I see, it truly is clearer if you work with wave functions. So the main difference is actually that the wave function that represents a system of fermions is different from the wave function representing a system of fermions (the first one being antisymmetric under permutation of 2 coordinates). However, the physical state of the system before and after the permutation is the same, as it should be, because the particles are identical!
      $endgroup$
      – Hightide
      Jun 7 at 10:25







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Yes, to put it more formally, choosing whether your wave functions are symmetric or antisymmetric divides your Hilbert space into two different 1D representations of the permutation group. Basically you "select" all the wave functions that are symmetric and you call them bosonic, same for antisymmetric and fermionic, but both these sets of wave functions have the property that their norm squared doesn't change under $S_N$. All the wave functions that don't belong in either category, you throw them away.
      $endgroup$
      – user2723984
      Jun 7 at 11:10











    • $begingroup$
      That was exactly the answer I needed. Thank you very much!
      $endgroup$
      – Hightide
      Jun 7 at 11:21















    $begingroup$
    I see, it truly is clearer if you work with wave functions. So the main difference is actually that the wave function that represents a system of fermions is different from the wave function representing a system of fermions (the first one being antisymmetric under permutation of 2 coordinates). However, the physical state of the system before and after the permutation is the same, as it should be, because the particles are identical!
    $endgroup$
    – Hightide
    Jun 7 at 10:25





    $begingroup$
    I see, it truly is clearer if you work with wave functions. So the main difference is actually that the wave function that represents a system of fermions is different from the wave function representing a system of fermions (the first one being antisymmetric under permutation of 2 coordinates). However, the physical state of the system before and after the permutation is the same, as it should be, because the particles are identical!
    $endgroup$
    – Hightide
    Jun 7 at 10:25





    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    Yes, to put it more formally, choosing whether your wave functions are symmetric or antisymmetric divides your Hilbert space into two different 1D representations of the permutation group. Basically you "select" all the wave functions that are symmetric and you call them bosonic, same for antisymmetric and fermionic, but both these sets of wave functions have the property that their norm squared doesn't change under $S_N$. All the wave functions that don't belong in either category, you throw them away.
    $endgroup$
    – user2723984
    Jun 7 at 11:10





    $begingroup$
    Yes, to put it more formally, choosing whether your wave functions are symmetric or antisymmetric divides your Hilbert space into two different 1D representations of the permutation group. Basically you "select" all the wave functions that are symmetric and you call them bosonic, same for antisymmetric and fermionic, but both these sets of wave functions have the property that their norm squared doesn't change under $S_N$. All the wave functions that don't belong in either category, you throw them away.
    $endgroup$
    – user2723984
    Jun 7 at 11:10













    $begingroup$
    That was exactly the answer I needed. Thank you very much!
    $endgroup$
    – Hightide
    Jun 7 at 11:21




    $begingroup$
    That was exactly the answer I needed. Thank you very much!
    $endgroup$
    – Hightide
    Jun 7 at 11:21













    2












    $begingroup$


    (to be specific |ψ⟩ and −|ψ⟩ are the same state).




    Err... yes and no. As analogy, consider the numbers $i$ and $-i$. Whenever you have a function expressed in terms of real numbers, $i$ and $-i$ are indistinguishable. For instance, $x^2+1=0$ is true for both, $x^3+1=0$ is false for both. When we look at what properties they have through the real numbers, they are the "same" number. Any attempt to create something that identifies one, using just real numbers, will also identify the other. And yet clearly they are different numbers.



    Similarly, for any linear operator $H$, we have that $langle-psi |H(-psi)rangle = langlepsi |Hpsirangle$. So any observable will give the same result for both states, and the states are in this sense "indistinguishable" and thus "the same". But clearly they're not actually the same state. One is $psi$ and the other is $-psi$. One of them, when added to $psi$, yields $2psi$, and the other one yields $0$. They are equivalent states (given a particular definition of "equivalent"), but they are not the same state.



    As another analogy, if a copy of Earth out of anti-matter, then (putting aside symmetry violations), that planet would look like Earth. People would think the same way and do the same things as on the original Earth. These two Earths would, in terms of all these observations, be "the same". And yet they would not in fact be the same thing: put two actually identical Earths next to each other, and you have two identical Earths. Put an Earth and an anti-matter Earth next to each other, and you have a huge explosion.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      2












      $begingroup$


      (to be specific |ψ⟩ and −|ψ⟩ are the same state).




      Err... yes and no. As analogy, consider the numbers $i$ and $-i$. Whenever you have a function expressed in terms of real numbers, $i$ and $-i$ are indistinguishable. For instance, $x^2+1=0$ is true for both, $x^3+1=0$ is false for both. When we look at what properties they have through the real numbers, they are the "same" number. Any attempt to create something that identifies one, using just real numbers, will also identify the other. And yet clearly they are different numbers.



      Similarly, for any linear operator $H$, we have that $langle-psi |H(-psi)rangle = langlepsi |Hpsirangle$. So any observable will give the same result for both states, and the states are in this sense "indistinguishable" and thus "the same". But clearly they're not actually the same state. One is $psi$ and the other is $-psi$. One of them, when added to $psi$, yields $2psi$, and the other one yields $0$. They are equivalent states (given a particular definition of "equivalent"), but they are not the same state.



      As another analogy, if a copy of Earth out of anti-matter, then (putting aside symmetry violations), that planet would look like Earth. People would think the same way and do the same things as on the original Earth. These two Earths would, in terms of all these observations, be "the same". And yet they would not in fact be the same thing: put two actually identical Earths next to each other, and you have two identical Earths. Put an Earth and an anti-matter Earth next to each other, and you have a huge explosion.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$


        (to be specific |ψ⟩ and −|ψ⟩ are the same state).




        Err... yes and no. As analogy, consider the numbers $i$ and $-i$. Whenever you have a function expressed in terms of real numbers, $i$ and $-i$ are indistinguishable. For instance, $x^2+1=0$ is true for both, $x^3+1=0$ is false for both. When we look at what properties they have through the real numbers, they are the "same" number. Any attempt to create something that identifies one, using just real numbers, will also identify the other. And yet clearly they are different numbers.



        Similarly, for any linear operator $H$, we have that $langle-psi |H(-psi)rangle = langlepsi |Hpsirangle$. So any observable will give the same result for both states, and the states are in this sense "indistinguishable" and thus "the same". But clearly they're not actually the same state. One is $psi$ and the other is $-psi$. One of them, when added to $psi$, yields $2psi$, and the other one yields $0$. They are equivalent states (given a particular definition of "equivalent"), but they are not the same state.



        As another analogy, if a copy of Earth out of anti-matter, then (putting aside symmetry violations), that planet would look like Earth. People would think the same way and do the same things as on the original Earth. These two Earths would, in terms of all these observations, be "the same". And yet they would not in fact be the same thing: put two actually identical Earths next to each other, and you have two identical Earths. Put an Earth and an anti-matter Earth next to each other, and you have a huge explosion.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$




        (to be specific |ψ⟩ and −|ψ⟩ are the same state).




        Err... yes and no. As analogy, consider the numbers $i$ and $-i$. Whenever you have a function expressed in terms of real numbers, $i$ and $-i$ are indistinguishable. For instance, $x^2+1=0$ is true for both, $x^3+1=0$ is false for both. When we look at what properties they have through the real numbers, they are the "same" number. Any attempt to create something that identifies one, using just real numbers, will also identify the other. And yet clearly they are different numbers.



        Similarly, for any linear operator $H$, we have that $langle-psi |H(-psi)rangle = langlepsi |Hpsirangle$. So any observable will give the same result for both states, and the states are in this sense "indistinguishable" and thus "the same". But clearly they're not actually the same state. One is $psi$ and the other is $-psi$. One of them, when added to $psi$, yields $2psi$, and the other one yields $0$. They are equivalent states (given a particular definition of "equivalent"), but they are not the same state.



        As another analogy, if a copy of Earth out of anti-matter, then (putting aside symmetry violations), that planet would look like Earth. People would think the same way and do the same things as on the original Earth. These two Earths would, in terms of all these observations, be "the same". And yet they would not in fact be the same thing: put two actually identical Earths next to each other, and you have two identical Earths. Put an Earth and an anti-matter Earth next to each other, and you have a huge explosion.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jun 7 at 18:52









        AcccumulationAcccumulation

        4,0637 silver badges16 bronze badges




        4,0637 silver badges16 bronze badges





















            0












            $begingroup$

            $newcommandKet[1]left $
            You studied that if $|psirangle$ is a physical wavefunction, it must have permutation symmetry. This means that, if $hatP$ is the permutation operator, then $|psirangle$ must be an eigenfunction of the operator. So, $hatP|psirangle = pm |psirangle $. We define the wavefunctions that have the +1 eigenvalue as Bosons and that of -1 eigenvalue as Fermions.



            So, the wavefunctions that have + 1 eigenvalue are different from that of -1 eigenvalue.



            The wavefunction of a system determines all the properties of it, so naturally fermionic and bosonic systems would have different properties.



            Let me know if you want to know something specific that I haven't mentioned !






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for your answer! I am pretty sure I understand it now
              $endgroup$
              – Hightide
              Jun 7 at 14:46















            0












            $begingroup$

            $newcommandKet[1]left $
            You studied that if $|psirangle$ is a physical wavefunction, it must have permutation symmetry. This means that, if $hatP$ is the permutation operator, then $|psirangle$ must be an eigenfunction of the operator. So, $hatP|psirangle = pm |psirangle $. We define the wavefunctions that have the +1 eigenvalue as Bosons and that of -1 eigenvalue as Fermions.



            So, the wavefunctions that have + 1 eigenvalue are different from that of -1 eigenvalue.



            The wavefunction of a system determines all the properties of it, so naturally fermionic and bosonic systems would have different properties.



            Let me know if you want to know something specific that I haven't mentioned !






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for your answer! I am pretty sure I understand it now
              $endgroup$
              – Hightide
              Jun 7 at 14:46













            0












            0








            0





            $begingroup$

            $newcommandKet[1]left $
            You studied that if $|psirangle$ is a physical wavefunction, it must have permutation symmetry. This means that, if $hatP$ is the permutation operator, then $|psirangle$ must be an eigenfunction of the operator. So, $hatP|psirangle = pm |psirangle $. We define the wavefunctions that have the +1 eigenvalue as Bosons and that of -1 eigenvalue as Fermions.



            So, the wavefunctions that have + 1 eigenvalue are different from that of -1 eigenvalue.



            The wavefunction of a system determines all the properties of it, so naturally fermionic and bosonic systems would have different properties.



            Let me know if you want to know something specific that I haven't mentioned !






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            $newcommandKet[1]left $
            You studied that if $|psirangle$ is a physical wavefunction, it must have permutation symmetry. This means that, if $hatP$ is the permutation operator, then $|psirangle$ must be an eigenfunction of the operator. So, $hatP|psirangle = pm |psirangle $. We define the wavefunctions that have the +1 eigenvalue as Bosons and that of -1 eigenvalue as Fermions.



            So, the wavefunctions that have + 1 eigenvalue are different from that of -1 eigenvalue.



            The wavefunction of a system determines all the properties of it, so naturally fermionic and bosonic systems would have different properties.



            Let me know if you want to know something specific that I haven't mentioned !







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Jun 7 at 14:06









            Sparsh MishraSparsh Mishra

            985 bronze badges




            985 bronze badges











            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for your answer! I am pretty sure I understand it now
              $endgroup$
              – Hightide
              Jun 7 at 14:46
















            • $begingroup$
              Thank you for your answer! I am pretty sure I understand it now
              $endgroup$
              – Hightide
              Jun 7 at 14:46















            $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer! I am pretty sure I understand it now
            $endgroup$
            – Hightide
            Jun 7 at 14:46




            $begingroup$
            Thank you for your answer! I am pretty sure I understand it now
            $endgroup$
            – Hightide
            Jun 7 at 14:46

















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f484772%2fdifference-between-fermions-and-bosons-in-statistical-mechanics%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Wikipedia:Vital articles Мазмуну Biography - Өмүр баян Philosophy and psychology - Философия жана психология Religion - Дин Social sciences - Коомдук илимдер Language and literature - Тил жана адабият Science - Илим Technology - Технология Arts and recreation - Искусство жана эс алуу History and geography - Тарых жана география Навигация менюсу

            Bruxelas-Capital Índice Historia | Composición | Situación lingüística | Clima | Cidades irmandadas | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióneO uso das linguas en Bruxelas e a situación do neerlandés"Rexión de Bruxelas Capital"o orixinalSitio da rexiónPáxina de Bruselas no sitio da Oficina de Promoción Turística de Valonia e BruxelasMapa Interactivo da Rexión de Bruxelas-CapitaleeWorldCat332144929079854441105155190212ID28008674080552-90000 0001 0666 3698n94104302ID540940339365017018237

            What should I write in an apology letter, since I have decided not to join a company after accepting an offer letterShould I keep looking after accepting a job offer?What should I do when I've been verbally told I would get an offer letter, but still haven't gotten one after 4 weeks?Do I accept an offer from a company that I am not likely to join?New job hasn't confirmed starting date and I want to give current employer as much notice as possibleHow should I address my manager in my resignation letter?HR delayed background verification, now jobless as resignedNo email communication after accepting a formal written offer. How should I phrase the call?What should I do if after receiving a verbal offer letter I am informed that my written job offer is put on hold due to some internal issues?Should I inform the current employer that I am about to resign within 1-2 weeks since I have signed the offer letter and waiting for visa?What company will do, if I send their offer letter to another company