What would prevent chimeras from reproducing with each other?Evolution of species with separate sapient and non-sapient forms?Anatomically Correct: 4-legged sapient creatures (“centaurs” etc.)What would happen to a high-pressure creature in a low-pressure atmosphere? (3atm)Growing magical creatures tissues in vitroHow would biological engineers control their creatures?Why is this creature afraid of water but not of body or plant fluids?How would two Jackalopes fight each other?Creating a scientifically semi-valid super-soldier, part 8: CommunicationWhy are cambions unable to reproduce amongst each other?What circumstances would ensure that hybrid species of frankencats are produced in the wild naturally?

Why isn’t the tax system continuous rather than bracketed?

Is there a short way to compare many values mutually at same time without using multiple 'AND'-s?

Was touching your nose a greeting in second millenium Mesopotamia?

Why does the numerical solution of an ODE move away from an unstable equilibrium?

Find smallest index that is identical to the value in an array

If temperature is related to average kinetic energy in an ideal gas, then does speeding up the gas container affect its temperature?

Firefox Arm64 available but RapsPi 3B+ still 32 bit

Should my manager be aware of private LinkedIn approaches I receive? How to politely have this happen?

Is there any reason to avoid sunglasses with blue lenses?

Content builder HTTPS

Is there any set of 2-6 notes that doesn't have a chord name?

How risky is real estate?

How to perform Login Authentication at the client-side?

How can I convince my reader that I will not use a certain trope?

How many satellites can stay in a Lagrange point?

Declining an offer to present a poster instead of a paper

STM Microcontroller burns every time

First-year PhD giving a talk among well-established researchers in the field

What do you call the action of someone tackling a stronger person?

Can a US President have someone sent to prison?

Why would people reject a god's purely beneficial blessing?

Does the UK have a written constitution?

How can I repair scratches on a painted French door?

Is there a maximum distance from a planet that a moon can orbit?



What would prevent chimeras from reproducing with each other?


Evolution of species with separate sapient and non-sapient forms?Anatomically Correct: 4-legged sapient creatures (“centaurs” etc.)What would happen to a high-pressure creature in a low-pressure atmosphere? (3atm)Growing magical creatures tissues in vitroHow would biological engineers control their creatures?Why is this creature afraid of water but not of body or plant fluids?How would two Jackalopes fight each other?Creating a scientifically semi-valid super-soldier, part 8: CommunicationWhy are cambions unable to reproduce amongst each other?What circumstances would ensure that hybrid species of frankencats are produced in the wild naturally?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








8












$begingroup$


There exists a polymerization spell that allows distinct animals to combine with each other, creating an entirely new creature. The beasts in question are held in transumutation circles linked by ley lines and surrounded by specific ingredients to make the spell work. Ingredients are specific to the creatures in question, or setting will go wrong and you will end up with a messy, organic blob.



After many hours of ritual chanting, the summoner finishes the spell with the phrase "FUSION!! HA!!, which combines the animals. These creatures are not like tigons or ligers, beings that have numerous biological problems due to their unnatural situation. Instead, it is a true fusion of two or more creatures, a symbiotic joining that gives the creature the best traits of its parents.



The chimera, such as a sphinx, a sharktopus, or a piranha-conda, is a fusion of the components of both creatures to create a unique biological system. Due to this factor, they are unable to breed with either species, as the resulting animal looks completely different from both parent races. However, it has also been discovered that chimeras of the same type cannot breed with each other either. The creatures were not made sterile, but are simply incompatible with each other despite them being the same species. This makes the business of making these things expensive, as they must be custom- built each time.



How could chineras be prevented from reproducing with each other?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Depending on what "the best traits of its parents" is and whether or not there is a systematic method for merging the same creatures repeatedly, the answer may change. If you could clarify on these points, it will narrow down the scope of the question.
    $endgroup$
    – Andrew Fan
    Jun 8 at 13:28






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    A rose by any other name. Creatures that are unable to reproduce with their own kind are sterile. But you may want to consider the curious case of child-bearing mules....
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    Jun 8 at 14:43







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You say that "chimeras of the same type cannot breed with each other" but also say that they "were not made sterile". This seems rather contradictory without further explanation, because if they are not sterile, they must be able to successfully breed with something. You need to figure out what that something is before your question can be properly answered.
    $endgroup$
    – Palarran
    Jun 8 at 14:58






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    If... if you mix a Komodo dragon and a skunk... You get a Komodo Drunk!!! Hehehehe!!!
    $endgroup$
    – Joe Bloggs
    Jun 8 at 15:28






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Bonus points to anyone who gets that reference.
    $endgroup$
    – Joe Bloggs
    Jun 8 at 15:35

















8












$begingroup$


There exists a polymerization spell that allows distinct animals to combine with each other, creating an entirely new creature. The beasts in question are held in transumutation circles linked by ley lines and surrounded by specific ingredients to make the spell work. Ingredients are specific to the creatures in question, or setting will go wrong and you will end up with a messy, organic blob.



After many hours of ritual chanting, the summoner finishes the spell with the phrase "FUSION!! HA!!, which combines the animals. These creatures are not like tigons or ligers, beings that have numerous biological problems due to their unnatural situation. Instead, it is a true fusion of two or more creatures, a symbiotic joining that gives the creature the best traits of its parents.



The chimera, such as a sphinx, a sharktopus, or a piranha-conda, is a fusion of the components of both creatures to create a unique biological system. Due to this factor, they are unable to breed with either species, as the resulting animal looks completely different from both parent races. However, it has also been discovered that chimeras of the same type cannot breed with each other either. The creatures were not made sterile, but are simply incompatible with each other despite them being the same species. This makes the business of making these things expensive, as they must be custom- built each time.



How could chineras be prevented from reproducing with each other?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Depending on what "the best traits of its parents" is and whether or not there is a systematic method for merging the same creatures repeatedly, the answer may change. If you could clarify on these points, it will narrow down the scope of the question.
    $endgroup$
    – Andrew Fan
    Jun 8 at 13:28






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    A rose by any other name. Creatures that are unable to reproduce with their own kind are sterile. But you may want to consider the curious case of child-bearing mules....
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    Jun 8 at 14:43







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You say that "chimeras of the same type cannot breed with each other" but also say that they "were not made sterile". This seems rather contradictory without further explanation, because if they are not sterile, they must be able to successfully breed with something. You need to figure out what that something is before your question can be properly answered.
    $endgroup$
    – Palarran
    Jun 8 at 14:58






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    If... if you mix a Komodo dragon and a skunk... You get a Komodo Drunk!!! Hehehehe!!!
    $endgroup$
    – Joe Bloggs
    Jun 8 at 15:28






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Bonus points to anyone who gets that reference.
    $endgroup$
    – Joe Bloggs
    Jun 8 at 15:35













8












8








8


1



$begingroup$


There exists a polymerization spell that allows distinct animals to combine with each other, creating an entirely new creature. The beasts in question are held in transumutation circles linked by ley lines and surrounded by specific ingredients to make the spell work. Ingredients are specific to the creatures in question, or setting will go wrong and you will end up with a messy, organic blob.



After many hours of ritual chanting, the summoner finishes the spell with the phrase "FUSION!! HA!!, which combines the animals. These creatures are not like tigons or ligers, beings that have numerous biological problems due to their unnatural situation. Instead, it is a true fusion of two or more creatures, a symbiotic joining that gives the creature the best traits of its parents.



The chimera, such as a sphinx, a sharktopus, or a piranha-conda, is a fusion of the components of both creatures to create a unique biological system. Due to this factor, they are unable to breed with either species, as the resulting animal looks completely different from both parent races. However, it has also been discovered that chimeras of the same type cannot breed with each other either. The creatures were not made sterile, but are simply incompatible with each other despite them being the same species. This makes the business of making these things expensive, as they must be custom- built each time.



How could chineras be prevented from reproducing with each other?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




There exists a polymerization spell that allows distinct animals to combine with each other, creating an entirely new creature. The beasts in question are held in transumutation circles linked by ley lines and surrounded by specific ingredients to make the spell work. Ingredients are specific to the creatures in question, or setting will go wrong and you will end up with a messy, organic blob.



After many hours of ritual chanting, the summoner finishes the spell with the phrase "FUSION!! HA!!, which combines the animals. These creatures are not like tigons or ligers, beings that have numerous biological problems due to their unnatural situation. Instead, it is a true fusion of two or more creatures, a symbiotic joining that gives the creature the best traits of its parents.



The chimera, such as a sphinx, a sharktopus, or a piranha-conda, is a fusion of the components of both creatures to create a unique biological system. Due to this factor, they are unable to breed with either species, as the resulting animal looks completely different from both parent races. However, it has also been discovered that chimeras of the same type cannot breed with each other either. The creatures were not made sterile, but are simply incompatible with each other despite them being the same species. This makes the business of making these things expensive, as they must be custom- built each time.



How could chineras be prevented from reproducing with each other?







biology creature-design mythical-creatures biochemistry reproduction






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jun 8 at 18:42









Cyn

15.2k2 gold badges31 silver badges71 bronze badges




15.2k2 gold badges31 silver badges71 bronze badges










asked Jun 8 at 13:16









IncognitoIncognito

9,4419 gold badges78 silver badges136 bronze badges




9,4419 gold badges78 silver badges136 bronze badges







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Depending on what "the best traits of its parents" is and whether or not there is a systematic method for merging the same creatures repeatedly, the answer may change. If you could clarify on these points, it will narrow down the scope of the question.
    $endgroup$
    – Andrew Fan
    Jun 8 at 13:28






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    A rose by any other name. Creatures that are unable to reproduce with their own kind are sterile. But you may want to consider the curious case of child-bearing mules....
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    Jun 8 at 14:43







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You say that "chimeras of the same type cannot breed with each other" but also say that they "were not made sterile". This seems rather contradictory without further explanation, because if they are not sterile, they must be able to successfully breed with something. You need to figure out what that something is before your question can be properly answered.
    $endgroup$
    – Palarran
    Jun 8 at 14:58






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    If... if you mix a Komodo dragon and a skunk... You get a Komodo Drunk!!! Hehehehe!!!
    $endgroup$
    – Joe Bloggs
    Jun 8 at 15:28






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Bonus points to anyone who gets that reference.
    $endgroup$
    – Joe Bloggs
    Jun 8 at 15:35












  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Depending on what "the best traits of its parents" is and whether or not there is a systematic method for merging the same creatures repeatedly, the answer may change. If you could clarify on these points, it will narrow down the scope of the question.
    $endgroup$
    – Andrew Fan
    Jun 8 at 13:28






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    A rose by any other name. Creatures that are unable to reproduce with their own kind are sterile. But you may want to consider the curious case of child-bearing mules....
    $endgroup$
    – JBH
    Jun 8 at 14:43







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    You say that "chimeras of the same type cannot breed with each other" but also say that they "were not made sterile". This seems rather contradictory without further explanation, because if they are not sterile, they must be able to successfully breed with something. You need to figure out what that something is before your question can be properly answered.
    $endgroup$
    – Palarran
    Jun 8 at 14:58






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    If... if you mix a Komodo dragon and a skunk... You get a Komodo Drunk!!! Hehehehe!!!
    $endgroup$
    – Joe Bloggs
    Jun 8 at 15:28






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Bonus points to anyone who gets that reference.
    $endgroup$
    – Joe Bloggs
    Jun 8 at 15:35







3




3




$begingroup$
Depending on what "the best traits of its parents" is and whether or not there is a systematic method for merging the same creatures repeatedly, the answer may change. If you could clarify on these points, it will narrow down the scope of the question.
$endgroup$
– Andrew Fan
Jun 8 at 13:28




$begingroup$
Depending on what "the best traits of its parents" is and whether or not there is a systematic method for merging the same creatures repeatedly, the answer may change. If you could clarify on these points, it will narrow down the scope of the question.
$endgroup$
– Andrew Fan
Jun 8 at 13:28




1




1




$begingroup$
A rose by any other name. Creatures that are unable to reproduce with their own kind are sterile. But you may want to consider the curious case of child-bearing mules....
$endgroup$
– JBH
Jun 8 at 14:43





$begingroup$
A rose by any other name. Creatures that are unable to reproduce with their own kind are sterile. But you may want to consider the curious case of child-bearing mules....
$endgroup$
– JBH
Jun 8 at 14:43





2




2




$begingroup$
You say that "chimeras of the same type cannot breed with each other" but also say that they "were not made sterile". This seems rather contradictory without further explanation, because if they are not sterile, they must be able to successfully breed with something. You need to figure out what that something is before your question can be properly answered.
$endgroup$
– Palarran
Jun 8 at 14:58




$begingroup$
You say that "chimeras of the same type cannot breed with each other" but also say that they "were not made sterile". This seems rather contradictory without further explanation, because if they are not sterile, they must be able to successfully breed with something. You need to figure out what that something is before your question can be properly answered.
$endgroup$
– Palarran
Jun 8 at 14:58




3




3




$begingroup$
If... if you mix a Komodo dragon and a skunk... You get a Komodo Drunk!!! Hehehehe!!!
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
Jun 8 at 15:28




$begingroup$
If... if you mix a Komodo dragon and a skunk... You get a Komodo Drunk!!! Hehehehe!!!
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
Jun 8 at 15:28




1




1




$begingroup$
Bonus points to anyone who gets that reference.
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
Jun 8 at 15:35




$begingroup$
Bonus points to anyone who gets that reference.
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
Jun 8 at 15:35










6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes


















14












$begingroup$

They can breed. They just don't breed true.



Start with Mendel and his peas. There is more going on in the genome that is apparent in the phenotype. When you cross 2 animals apparently the same, you will get some traits in the offspring that were present in neither parent.
mendels peas



https://www.slideshare.net/melindamacdonald/mendel-and-his-peas-30447902



This is why first world farmers don't save seed since the 1930s - hybrid seeds don't breed true.



But you can riff on this with the magic angle. If you dig into the code used to make any given software product you can find artifacts of its prior applications. Coder credo: "use old code". It is field tested to work and it is easy to copy paste. So too the magic underpinning of your hybridization magic. In the magic are relics of its prior uses hybridizing other animals, and possibly other more distantly related applications.



When you cross 2 magic hybrids, in the second generation your creatures will manifest aspects of their "magic genome" that was not evident in either parents. There will be aspects of other prior hybrids. There may be manifestations of necromantic or regenerative magic. There might be a summoning. It is already enough work to make a hybrid using the magic you have; this magic is cumbersome and annotations when they exist are cryptic and hard to decipher: either by intent, incompetence or extreme antiquity of the annotators.




No result is fine and realistic. In real life, defective code (or mutant gene) probably just will not run/work. Much more interesting is when bad code / mutant gene gives an unexpected result. Maybe still usable. Maybe a total disaster. Maybe much better than what you expected. That is how real genetics works.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    8












    $begingroup$

    Separate DNA.



    The DNA of the creatures remains separate. While the immune response of each creature will no longer murder these alternative DNA cells (strongest traits of the parents!) It also means that when creating sperm cells the DNA remains separate.



    Example, in the case of 3 creatures being merged, the sperm created would consist for 33% out of each individually added creature.



    Theoretically they could still reproduce with their original component creatures, but which creature is going to do that? And it will not produce a chimera, but a single one of the original species, assuming the wrong DNA doesn't merge with the cell first and cause the egg cell to fail. So in the end it wouldn't be an efficient use of your time to let them breed like that.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$




















      3












      $begingroup$

      The Gods determined that taboos must be broken.



      • Just as in Greek mythology, the Sphinx - Σφίγξ- was most often depicted as female with a human head, a lion (or other great cat) and wings:


      treacherous and merciless




      In Egyptian mythology it would have been without wings and male.



      • Such archetypal creatures have been common in mythologies of the world since these creatures were first known, many are transgender, many are homosexual or lesbian and thus unlikely to procreate.


      • The Sirens of Greek Myth were always depicted as female, seeming to have but one purpose, to lure sailors to their death on the rocks (for who knows what purpose - spiritual energy, food, maybe out of spite for their loneliness). Female spirits.


      • Centaurs (human/horse) and Minotaurs (human/bull hybrid) were most often portrayed as male only, these liminal creatures symbolizing the untamed aspects of our social nature. Male spirits.


      To sum-up: each creature has a purpose in the mind of peoples, each reflects a certain aspect of either the female psyche, or the male's - most often to do with the taboos of that society, most usually centered around death and sexual/social boundaries rather than normal reproductive life.



      The Gods made them so to reflect humanities's foibles, weaknesses, desires and fears back to them (or perhaps to reflect their own) - often setting people traps to fall into to their shame and death (The Gods also made it possible for only such creatures as fulfilled this requirement to exist - all others are forbidden).






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        TL;DR: Chimeras of the same type are always the same sex, or not inclined towards the opposite sex. There are no mermen or minotaur cows.
        $endgroup$
        – Shawn V. Wilson
        Jun 9 at 23:29











      • $begingroup$
        My intent was to make your point for you. I didn't really think your answer was "too long"; however, I didn't think the part about the gods' intent was necessary. The sexuality could be an effect of the chimerogenesis by itself.
        $endgroup$
        – Shawn V. Wilson
        Jun 11 at 2:08










      • $begingroup$
        I hadn't thought of that, sounds more plausible than my variant. Joe bloggs' answer seems to cover it from that point of view, but not in those words otherwise I'd suggest you compose an answer yourself.
        $endgroup$
        – Don Qualm
        Jun 11 at 2:12


















      3












      $begingroup$

      Magic?



      The magic that binds the Chimera together also prevents them from breeding. The original component animals weren’t sterile, but the resulting creature is (because of the transmutation process).



      If you want a slightly more involved (and messier) reason:



      Magic!!



      The magic that binds the Chimera together is linked to their life force. When creatures breed, their life forces intermingle. The Chimera magic is powerful, but delicate, so mixing two chimeric charms via the act of breeding tends to result in spectacularly unintended side effects and apprentice summoners cleaning globules of the two (now ex) Chimera off the walls, the floor and the ceiling.



      Either way: incompatibility between the magic and the process of breeding is what prevents the breeding.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        Made by Magic seems to be self answering.
        $endgroup$
        – StephenG
        Jun 8 at 17:51











      • $begingroup$
        @StephenG: answers needn’t be obscure to be useful!
        $endgroup$
        – Joe Bloggs
        Jun 8 at 19:04


















      3












      $begingroup$

      Each time you make a chimera you are creating a new species



      Some simple people think that for making a basic sphinx you only need to mix a human and a lion. That somehow you mix both and the result will always be a sphinx. Those that hold such views reveal their uttermost ignorance of the art of chimeracraftship. For it is clear for even the most dumb, that when mixing a person with a lion you could end up with a creature having the head of a lion and a body of a human as much as a one with the head of a human and the body of a lion. Or a lion with an additional pair of human arms, or a person with lion tail, the possibilities are countless. And that is only taking into account the parts of the creatures that will be mixed.



      The reality is that the floor lines, the ingredients put around them, and even the chantics themselves are part of the chimeras. They are not some "instructions" for how should the animals mix, but actually become part of them.



      Now, it is true that the effect of some ingredients doesn't a big influence on the creature, for instance having a greater number of corn grains will generally just result in a more yellow fur in the resulting sphinx¹ and a proficient summoner is usually able to obtain a decent result even with suboptimal ingredients (like fruit non being fresh), at the cost of a longer process and putting more of its power into the transmutation.



      But the fact is that everything taking part on the invocation, from the disposition of the ingredients, the exact intonation, rhythm and pauses used by the summoner, to the original themselves take a crucial role in the forming of the new species. Thus, even though they are all classified as sphinxes, each and every one of them is its own specie, as they have their own lineage (which will only ever have a single individual, sadly).



      A few chimera creators have done some experiments trying to create two distinct individuals from the same species, usually by having two summoners build the same type of chimera at the same time, with the same ingredients and using pairs of animals of the same litter. So far with no success.



      On the other hand, this is mostly an academic question with most summoners just accepting as a fact that the resulting animals will not be able to breed, and very happy it is this way, given the large profits they make from each chimera they create. Actually their guild would get very angry with anyone that proved otherwise.



      Finally, note this is completely consistent that even on the Creation, Women and Men were not created separately but one from another, which for chimeracrafters is evidence it is not possible² to create on different acts two individuals of the same species (ie. two individuals that are able to breed between themselves).



      .



      ¹ The creation of sphinx by the Ancients show us that they were even able to create sphinxes even without corn, although no corn-free recipe is known today.



      ² At this point this usually rises a theological discussion on God's omnipotence when there are educated listeners in the room, which leads to their official position stating just that doing so would be extremely complicated and doing things this other way was a much more simple and elegant action from our Creator.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$




















        1












        $begingroup$

        Oh but they can breed. They just have the same problem as modern day bulldogs: they just don't have a shape that favours a tight fit.



        Or do you really picture a couple of these ones coupling?



        Chimera



        You've never seen sex capable chimeras for the same reason that Mosanto's crops are sterile: there is actual profit to be made if your customers always have to come back to you for more.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$















          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "579"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f148543%2fwhat-would-prevent-chimeras-from-reproducing-with-each-other%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          6 Answers
          6






          active

          oldest

          votes








          6 Answers
          6






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          14












          $begingroup$

          They can breed. They just don't breed true.



          Start with Mendel and his peas. There is more going on in the genome that is apparent in the phenotype. When you cross 2 animals apparently the same, you will get some traits in the offspring that were present in neither parent.
          mendels peas



          https://www.slideshare.net/melindamacdonald/mendel-and-his-peas-30447902



          This is why first world farmers don't save seed since the 1930s - hybrid seeds don't breed true.



          But you can riff on this with the magic angle. If you dig into the code used to make any given software product you can find artifacts of its prior applications. Coder credo: "use old code". It is field tested to work and it is easy to copy paste. So too the magic underpinning of your hybridization magic. In the magic are relics of its prior uses hybridizing other animals, and possibly other more distantly related applications.



          When you cross 2 magic hybrids, in the second generation your creatures will manifest aspects of their "magic genome" that was not evident in either parents. There will be aspects of other prior hybrids. There may be manifestations of necromantic or regenerative magic. There might be a summoning. It is already enough work to make a hybrid using the magic you have; this magic is cumbersome and annotations when they exist are cryptic and hard to decipher: either by intent, incompetence or extreme antiquity of the annotators.




          No result is fine and realistic. In real life, defective code (or mutant gene) probably just will not run/work. Much more interesting is when bad code / mutant gene gives an unexpected result. Maybe still usable. Maybe a total disaster. Maybe much better than what you expected. That is how real genetics works.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$

















            14












            $begingroup$

            They can breed. They just don't breed true.



            Start with Mendel and his peas. There is more going on in the genome that is apparent in the phenotype. When you cross 2 animals apparently the same, you will get some traits in the offspring that were present in neither parent.
            mendels peas



            https://www.slideshare.net/melindamacdonald/mendel-and-his-peas-30447902



            This is why first world farmers don't save seed since the 1930s - hybrid seeds don't breed true.



            But you can riff on this with the magic angle. If you dig into the code used to make any given software product you can find artifacts of its prior applications. Coder credo: "use old code". It is field tested to work and it is easy to copy paste. So too the magic underpinning of your hybridization magic. In the magic are relics of its prior uses hybridizing other animals, and possibly other more distantly related applications.



            When you cross 2 magic hybrids, in the second generation your creatures will manifest aspects of their "magic genome" that was not evident in either parents. There will be aspects of other prior hybrids. There may be manifestations of necromantic or regenerative magic. There might be a summoning. It is already enough work to make a hybrid using the magic you have; this magic is cumbersome and annotations when they exist are cryptic and hard to decipher: either by intent, incompetence or extreme antiquity of the annotators.




            No result is fine and realistic. In real life, defective code (or mutant gene) probably just will not run/work. Much more interesting is when bad code / mutant gene gives an unexpected result. Maybe still usable. Maybe a total disaster. Maybe much better than what you expected. That is how real genetics works.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$















              14












              14








              14





              $begingroup$

              They can breed. They just don't breed true.



              Start with Mendel and his peas. There is more going on in the genome that is apparent in the phenotype. When you cross 2 animals apparently the same, you will get some traits in the offspring that were present in neither parent.
              mendels peas



              https://www.slideshare.net/melindamacdonald/mendel-and-his-peas-30447902



              This is why first world farmers don't save seed since the 1930s - hybrid seeds don't breed true.



              But you can riff on this with the magic angle. If you dig into the code used to make any given software product you can find artifacts of its prior applications. Coder credo: "use old code". It is field tested to work and it is easy to copy paste. So too the magic underpinning of your hybridization magic. In the magic are relics of its prior uses hybridizing other animals, and possibly other more distantly related applications.



              When you cross 2 magic hybrids, in the second generation your creatures will manifest aspects of their "magic genome" that was not evident in either parents. There will be aspects of other prior hybrids. There may be manifestations of necromantic or regenerative magic. There might be a summoning. It is already enough work to make a hybrid using the magic you have; this magic is cumbersome and annotations when they exist are cryptic and hard to decipher: either by intent, incompetence or extreme antiquity of the annotators.




              No result is fine and realistic. In real life, defective code (or mutant gene) probably just will not run/work. Much more interesting is when bad code / mutant gene gives an unexpected result. Maybe still usable. Maybe a total disaster. Maybe much better than what you expected. That is how real genetics works.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$



              They can breed. They just don't breed true.



              Start with Mendel and his peas. There is more going on in the genome that is apparent in the phenotype. When you cross 2 animals apparently the same, you will get some traits in the offspring that were present in neither parent.
              mendels peas



              https://www.slideshare.net/melindamacdonald/mendel-and-his-peas-30447902



              This is why first world farmers don't save seed since the 1930s - hybrid seeds don't breed true.



              But you can riff on this with the magic angle. If you dig into the code used to make any given software product you can find artifacts of its prior applications. Coder credo: "use old code". It is field tested to work and it is easy to copy paste. So too the magic underpinning of your hybridization magic. In the magic are relics of its prior uses hybridizing other animals, and possibly other more distantly related applications.



              When you cross 2 magic hybrids, in the second generation your creatures will manifest aspects of their "magic genome" that was not evident in either parents. There will be aspects of other prior hybrids. There may be manifestations of necromantic or regenerative magic. There might be a summoning. It is already enough work to make a hybrid using the magic you have; this magic is cumbersome and annotations when they exist are cryptic and hard to decipher: either by intent, incompetence or extreme antiquity of the annotators.




              No result is fine and realistic. In real life, defective code (or mutant gene) probably just will not run/work. Much more interesting is when bad code / mutant gene gives an unexpected result. Maybe still usable. Maybe a total disaster. Maybe much better than what you expected. That is how real genetics works.







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited Jun 9 at 2:39

























              answered Jun 8 at 18:51









              WillkWillk

              127k30 gold badges238 silver badges529 bronze badges




              127k30 gold badges238 silver badges529 bronze badges























                  8












                  $begingroup$

                  Separate DNA.



                  The DNA of the creatures remains separate. While the immune response of each creature will no longer murder these alternative DNA cells (strongest traits of the parents!) It also means that when creating sperm cells the DNA remains separate.



                  Example, in the case of 3 creatures being merged, the sperm created would consist for 33% out of each individually added creature.



                  Theoretically they could still reproduce with their original component creatures, but which creature is going to do that? And it will not produce a chimera, but a single one of the original species, assuming the wrong DNA doesn't merge with the cell first and cause the egg cell to fail. So in the end it wouldn't be an efficient use of your time to let them breed like that.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$

















                    8












                    $begingroup$

                    Separate DNA.



                    The DNA of the creatures remains separate. While the immune response of each creature will no longer murder these alternative DNA cells (strongest traits of the parents!) It also means that when creating sperm cells the DNA remains separate.



                    Example, in the case of 3 creatures being merged, the sperm created would consist for 33% out of each individually added creature.



                    Theoretically they could still reproduce with their original component creatures, but which creature is going to do that? And it will not produce a chimera, but a single one of the original species, assuming the wrong DNA doesn't merge with the cell first and cause the egg cell to fail. So in the end it wouldn't be an efficient use of your time to let them breed like that.






                    share|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$















                      8












                      8








                      8





                      $begingroup$

                      Separate DNA.



                      The DNA of the creatures remains separate. While the immune response of each creature will no longer murder these alternative DNA cells (strongest traits of the parents!) It also means that when creating sperm cells the DNA remains separate.



                      Example, in the case of 3 creatures being merged, the sperm created would consist for 33% out of each individually added creature.



                      Theoretically they could still reproduce with their original component creatures, but which creature is going to do that? And it will not produce a chimera, but a single one of the original species, assuming the wrong DNA doesn't merge with the cell first and cause the egg cell to fail. So in the end it wouldn't be an efficient use of your time to let them breed like that.






                      share|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$



                      Separate DNA.



                      The DNA of the creatures remains separate. While the immune response of each creature will no longer murder these alternative DNA cells (strongest traits of the parents!) It also means that when creating sperm cells the DNA remains separate.



                      Example, in the case of 3 creatures being merged, the sperm created would consist for 33% out of each individually added creature.



                      Theoretically they could still reproduce with their original component creatures, but which creature is going to do that? And it will not produce a chimera, but a single one of the original species, assuming the wrong DNA doesn't merge with the cell first and cause the egg cell to fail. So in the end it wouldn't be an efficient use of your time to let them breed like that.







                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited Jun 8 at 16:30









                      Brythan

                      22.2k8 gold badges43 silver badges88 bronze badges




                      22.2k8 gold badges43 silver badges88 bronze badges










                      answered Jun 8 at 15:12









                      DemiganDemigan

                      12.1k1 gold badge11 silver badges58 bronze badges




                      12.1k1 gold badge11 silver badges58 bronze badges





















                          3












                          $begingroup$

                          The Gods determined that taboos must be broken.



                          • Just as in Greek mythology, the Sphinx - Σφίγξ- was most often depicted as female with a human head, a lion (or other great cat) and wings:


                          treacherous and merciless




                          In Egyptian mythology it would have been without wings and male.



                          • Such archetypal creatures have been common in mythologies of the world since these creatures were first known, many are transgender, many are homosexual or lesbian and thus unlikely to procreate.


                          • The Sirens of Greek Myth were always depicted as female, seeming to have but one purpose, to lure sailors to their death on the rocks (for who knows what purpose - spiritual energy, food, maybe out of spite for their loneliness). Female spirits.


                          • Centaurs (human/horse) and Minotaurs (human/bull hybrid) were most often portrayed as male only, these liminal creatures symbolizing the untamed aspects of our social nature. Male spirits.


                          To sum-up: each creature has a purpose in the mind of peoples, each reflects a certain aspect of either the female psyche, or the male's - most often to do with the taboos of that society, most usually centered around death and sexual/social boundaries rather than normal reproductive life.



                          The Gods made them so to reflect humanities's foibles, weaknesses, desires and fears back to them (or perhaps to reflect their own) - often setting people traps to fall into to their shame and death (The Gods also made it possible for only such creatures as fulfilled this requirement to exist - all others are forbidden).






                          share|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$












                          • $begingroup$
                            TL;DR: Chimeras of the same type are always the same sex, or not inclined towards the opposite sex. There are no mermen or minotaur cows.
                            $endgroup$
                            – Shawn V. Wilson
                            Jun 9 at 23:29











                          • $begingroup$
                            My intent was to make your point for you. I didn't really think your answer was "too long"; however, I didn't think the part about the gods' intent was necessary. The sexuality could be an effect of the chimerogenesis by itself.
                            $endgroup$
                            – Shawn V. Wilson
                            Jun 11 at 2:08










                          • $begingroup$
                            I hadn't thought of that, sounds more plausible than my variant. Joe bloggs' answer seems to cover it from that point of view, but not in those words otherwise I'd suggest you compose an answer yourself.
                            $endgroup$
                            – Don Qualm
                            Jun 11 at 2:12















                          3












                          $begingroup$

                          The Gods determined that taboos must be broken.



                          • Just as in Greek mythology, the Sphinx - Σφίγξ- was most often depicted as female with a human head, a lion (or other great cat) and wings:


                          treacherous and merciless




                          In Egyptian mythology it would have been without wings and male.



                          • Such archetypal creatures have been common in mythologies of the world since these creatures were first known, many are transgender, many are homosexual or lesbian and thus unlikely to procreate.


                          • The Sirens of Greek Myth were always depicted as female, seeming to have but one purpose, to lure sailors to their death on the rocks (for who knows what purpose - spiritual energy, food, maybe out of spite for their loneliness). Female spirits.


                          • Centaurs (human/horse) and Minotaurs (human/bull hybrid) were most often portrayed as male only, these liminal creatures symbolizing the untamed aspects of our social nature. Male spirits.


                          To sum-up: each creature has a purpose in the mind of peoples, each reflects a certain aspect of either the female psyche, or the male's - most often to do with the taboos of that society, most usually centered around death and sexual/social boundaries rather than normal reproductive life.



                          The Gods made them so to reflect humanities's foibles, weaknesses, desires and fears back to them (or perhaps to reflect their own) - often setting people traps to fall into to their shame and death (The Gods also made it possible for only such creatures as fulfilled this requirement to exist - all others are forbidden).






                          share|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$












                          • $begingroup$
                            TL;DR: Chimeras of the same type are always the same sex, or not inclined towards the opposite sex. There are no mermen or minotaur cows.
                            $endgroup$
                            – Shawn V. Wilson
                            Jun 9 at 23:29











                          • $begingroup$
                            My intent was to make your point for you. I didn't really think your answer was "too long"; however, I didn't think the part about the gods' intent was necessary. The sexuality could be an effect of the chimerogenesis by itself.
                            $endgroup$
                            – Shawn V. Wilson
                            Jun 11 at 2:08










                          • $begingroup$
                            I hadn't thought of that, sounds more plausible than my variant. Joe bloggs' answer seems to cover it from that point of view, but not in those words otherwise I'd suggest you compose an answer yourself.
                            $endgroup$
                            – Don Qualm
                            Jun 11 at 2:12













                          3












                          3








                          3





                          $begingroup$

                          The Gods determined that taboos must be broken.



                          • Just as in Greek mythology, the Sphinx - Σφίγξ- was most often depicted as female with a human head, a lion (or other great cat) and wings:


                          treacherous and merciless




                          In Egyptian mythology it would have been without wings and male.



                          • Such archetypal creatures have been common in mythologies of the world since these creatures were first known, many are transgender, many are homosexual or lesbian and thus unlikely to procreate.


                          • The Sirens of Greek Myth were always depicted as female, seeming to have but one purpose, to lure sailors to their death on the rocks (for who knows what purpose - spiritual energy, food, maybe out of spite for their loneliness). Female spirits.


                          • Centaurs (human/horse) and Minotaurs (human/bull hybrid) were most often portrayed as male only, these liminal creatures symbolizing the untamed aspects of our social nature. Male spirits.


                          To sum-up: each creature has a purpose in the mind of peoples, each reflects a certain aspect of either the female psyche, or the male's - most often to do with the taboos of that society, most usually centered around death and sexual/social boundaries rather than normal reproductive life.



                          The Gods made them so to reflect humanities's foibles, weaknesses, desires and fears back to them (or perhaps to reflect their own) - often setting people traps to fall into to their shame and death (The Gods also made it possible for only such creatures as fulfilled this requirement to exist - all others are forbidden).






                          share|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$



                          The Gods determined that taboos must be broken.



                          • Just as in Greek mythology, the Sphinx - Σφίγξ- was most often depicted as female with a human head, a lion (or other great cat) and wings:


                          treacherous and merciless




                          In Egyptian mythology it would have been without wings and male.



                          • Such archetypal creatures have been common in mythologies of the world since these creatures were first known, many are transgender, many are homosexual or lesbian and thus unlikely to procreate.


                          • The Sirens of Greek Myth were always depicted as female, seeming to have but one purpose, to lure sailors to their death on the rocks (for who knows what purpose - spiritual energy, food, maybe out of spite for their loneliness). Female spirits.


                          • Centaurs (human/horse) and Minotaurs (human/bull hybrid) were most often portrayed as male only, these liminal creatures symbolizing the untamed aspects of our social nature. Male spirits.


                          To sum-up: each creature has a purpose in the mind of peoples, each reflects a certain aspect of either the female psyche, or the male's - most often to do with the taboos of that society, most usually centered around death and sexual/social boundaries rather than normal reproductive life.



                          The Gods made them so to reflect humanities's foibles, weaknesses, desires and fears back to them (or perhaps to reflect their own) - often setting people traps to fall into to their shame and death (The Gods also made it possible for only such creatures as fulfilled this requirement to exist - all others are forbidden).







                          share|improve this answer














                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer








                          edited Jun 8 at 15:15

























                          answered Jun 8 at 14:10









                          Don QualmDon Qualm

                          9,6623 gold badges22 silver badges62 bronze badges




                          9,6623 gold badges22 silver badges62 bronze badges











                          • $begingroup$
                            TL;DR: Chimeras of the same type are always the same sex, or not inclined towards the opposite sex. There are no mermen or minotaur cows.
                            $endgroup$
                            – Shawn V. Wilson
                            Jun 9 at 23:29











                          • $begingroup$
                            My intent was to make your point for you. I didn't really think your answer was "too long"; however, I didn't think the part about the gods' intent was necessary. The sexuality could be an effect of the chimerogenesis by itself.
                            $endgroup$
                            – Shawn V. Wilson
                            Jun 11 at 2:08










                          • $begingroup$
                            I hadn't thought of that, sounds more plausible than my variant. Joe bloggs' answer seems to cover it from that point of view, but not in those words otherwise I'd suggest you compose an answer yourself.
                            $endgroup$
                            – Don Qualm
                            Jun 11 at 2:12
















                          • $begingroup$
                            TL;DR: Chimeras of the same type are always the same sex, or not inclined towards the opposite sex. There are no mermen or minotaur cows.
                            $endgroup$
                            – Shawn V. Wilson
                            Jun 9 at 23:29











                          • $begingroup$
                            My intent was to make your point for you. I didn't really think your answer was "too long"; however, I didn't think the part about the gods' intent was necessary. The sexuality could be an effect of the chimerogenesis by itself.
                            $endgroup$
                            – Shawn V. Wilson
                            Jun 11 at 2:08










                          • $begingroup$
                            I hadn't thought of that, sounds more plausible than my variant. Joe bloggs' answer seems to cover it from that point of view, but not in those words otherwise I'd suggest you compose an answer yourself.
                            $endgroup$
                            – Don Qualm
                            Jun 11 at 2:12















                          $begingroup$
                          TL;DR: Chimeras of the same type are always the same sex, or not inclined towards the opposite sex. There are no mermen or minotaur cows.
                          $endgroup$
                          – Shawn V. Wilson
                          Jun 9 at 23:29





                          $begingroup$
                          TL;DR: Chimeras of the same type are always the same sex, or not inclined towards the opposite sex. There are no mermen or minotaur cows.
                          $endgroup$
                          – Shawn V. Wilson
                          Jun 9 at 23:29













                          $begingroup$
                          My intent was to make your point for you. I didn't really think your answer was "too long"; however, I didn't think the part about the gods' intent was necessary. The sexuality could be an effect of the chimerogenesis by itself.
                          $endgroup$
                          – Shawn V. Wilson
                          Jun 11 at 2:08




                          $begingroup$
                          My intent was to make your point for you. I didn't really think your answer was "too long"; however, I didn't think the part about the gods' intent was necessary. The sexuality could be an effect of the chimerogenesis by itself.
                          $endgroup$
                          – Shawn V. Wilson
                          Jun 11 at 2:08












                          $begingroup$
                          I hadn't thought of that, sounds more plausible than my variant. Joe bloggs' answer seems to cover it from that point of view, but not in those words otherwise I'd suggest you compose an answer yourself.
                          $endgroup$
                          – Don Qualm
                          Jun 11 at 2:12




                          $begingroup$
                          I hadn't thought of that, sounds more plausible than my variant. Joe bloggs' answer seems to cover it from that point of view, but not in those words otherwise I'd suggest you compose an answer yourself.
                          $endgroup$
                          – Don Qualm
                          Jun 11 at 2:12











                          3












                          $begingroup$

                          Magic?



                          The magic that binds the Chimera together also prevents them from breeding. The original component animals weren’t sterile, but the resulting creature is (because of the transmutation process).



                          If you want a slightly more involved (and messier) reason:



                          Magic!!



                          The magic that binds the Chimera together is linked to their life force. When creatures breed, their life forces intermingle. The Chimera magic is powerful, but delicate, so mixing two chimeric charms via the act of breeding tends to result in spectacularly unintended side effects and apprentice summoners cleaning globules of the two (now ex) Chimera off the walls, the floor and the ceiling.



                          Either way: incompatibility between the magic and the process of breeding is what prevents the breeding.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$












                          • $begingroup$
                            Made by Magic seems to be self answering.
                            $endgroup$
                            – StephenG
                            Jun 8 at 17:51











                          • $begingroup$
                            @StephenG: answers needn’t be obscure to be useful!
                            $endgroup$
                            – Joe Bloggs
                            Jun 8 at 19:04















                          3












                          $begingroup$

                          Magic?



                          The magic that binds the Chimera together also prevents them from breeding. The original component animals weren’t sterile, but the resulting creature is (because of the transmutation process).



                          If you want a slightly more involved (and messier) reason:



                          Magic!!



                          The magic that binds the Chimera together is linked to their life force. When creatures breed, their life forces intermingle. The Chimera magic is powerful, but delicate, so mixing two chimeric charms via the act of breeding tends to result in spectacularly unintended side effects and apprentice summoners cleaning globules of the two (now ex) Chimera off the walls, the floor and the ceiling.



                          Either way: incompatibility between the magic and the process of breeding is what prevents the breeding.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$












                          • $begingroup$
                            Made by Magic seems to be self answering.
                            $endgroup$
                            – StephenG
                            Jun 8 at 17:51











                          • $begingroup$
                            @StephenG: answers needn’t be obscure to be useful!
                            $endgroup$
                            – Joe Bloggs
                            Jun 8 at 19:04













                          3












                          3








                          3





                          $begingroup$

                          Magic?



                          The magic that binds the Chimera together also prevents them from breeding. The original component animals weren’t sterile, but the resulting creature is (because of the transmutation process).



                          If you want a slightly more involved (and messier) reason:



                          Magic!!



                          The magic that binds the Chimera together is linked to their life force. When creatures breed, their life forces intermingle. The Chimera magic is powerful, but delicate, so mixing two chimeric charms via the act of breeding tends to result in spectacularly unintended side effects and apprentice summoners cleaning globules of the two (now ex) Chimera off the walls, the floor and the ceiling.



                          Either way: incompatibility between the magic and the process of breeding is what prevents the breeding.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          Magic?



                          The magic that binds the Chimera together also prevents them from breeding. The original component animals weren’t sterile, but the resulting creature is (because of the transmutation process).



                          If you want a slightly more involved (and messier) reason:



                          Magic!!



                          The magic that binds the Chimera together is linked to their life force. When creatures breed, their life forces intermingle. The Chimera magic is powerful, but delicate, so mixing two chimeric charms via the act of breeding tends to result in spectacularly unintended side effects and apprentice summoners cleaning globules of the two (now ex) Chimera off the walls, the floor and the ceiling.



                          Either way: incompatibility between the magic and the process of breeding is what prevents the breeding.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered Jun 8 at 15:34









                          Joe BloggsJoe Bloggs

                          38.3k20 gold badges107 silver badges191 bronze badges




                          38.3k20 gold badges107 silver badges191 bronze badges











                          • $begingroup$
                            Made by Magic seems to be self answering.
                            $endgroup$
                            – StephenG
                            Jun 8 at 17:51











                          • $begingroup$
                            @StephenG: answers needn’t be obscure to be useful!
                            $endgroup$
                            – Joe Bloggs
                            Jun 8 at 19:04
















                          • $begingroup$
                            Made by Magic seems to be self answering.
                            $endgroup$
                            – StephenG
                            Jun 8 at 17:51











                          • $begingroup$
                            @StephenG: answers needn’t be obscure to be useful!
                            $endgroup$
                            – Joe Bloggs
                            Jun 8 at 19:04















                          $begingroup$
                          Made by Magic seems to be self answering.
                          $endgroup$
                          – StephenG
                          Jun 8 at 17:51





                          $begingroup$
                          Made by Magic seems to be self answering.
                          $endgroup$
                          – StephenG
                          Jun 8 at 17:51













                          $begingroup$
                          @StephenG: answers needn’t be obscure to be useful!
                          $endgroup$
                          – Joe Bloggs
                          Jun 8 at 19:04




                          $begingroup$
                          @StephenG: answers needn’t be obscure to be useful!
                          $endgroup$
                          – Joe Bloggs
                          Jun 8 at 19:04











                          3












                          $begingroup$

                          Each time you make a chimera you are creating a new species



                          Some simple people think that for making a basic sphinx you only need to mix a human and a lion. That somehow you mix both and the result will always be a sphinx. Those that hold such views reveal their uttermost ignorance of the art of chimeracraftship. For it is clear for even the most dumb, that when mixing a person with a lion you could end up with a creature having the head of a lion and a body of a human as much as a one with the head of a human and the body of a lion. Or a lion with an additional pair of human arms, or a person with lion tail, the possibilities are countless. And that is only taking into account the parts of the creatures that will be mixed.



                          The reality is that the floor lines, the ingredients put around them, and even the chantics themselves are part of the chimeras. They are not some "instructions" for how should the animals mix, but actually become part of them.



                          Now, it is true that the effect of some ingredients doesn't a big influence on the creature, for instance having a greater number of corn grains will generally just result in a more yellow fur in the resulting sphinx¹ and a proficient summoner is usually able to obtain a decent result even with suboptimal ingredients (like fruit non being fresh), at the cost of a longer process and putting more of its power into the transmutation.



                          But the fact is that everything taking part on the invocation, from the disposition of the ingredients, the exact intonation, rhythm and pauses used by the summoner, to the original themselves take a crucial role in the forming of the new species. Thus, even though they are all classified as sphinxes, each and every one of them is its own specie, as they have their own lineage (which will only ever have a single individual, sadly).



                          A few chimera creators have done some experiments trying to create two distinct individuals from the same species, usually by having two summoners build the same type of chimera at the same time, with the same ingredients and using pairs of animals of the same litter. So far with no success.



                          On the other hand, this is mostly an academic question with most summoners just accepting as a fact that the resulting animals will not be able to breed, and very happy it is this way, given the large profits they make from each chimera they create. Actually their guild would get very angry with anyone that proved otherwise.



                          Finally, note this is completely consistent that even on the Creation, Women and Men were not created separately but one from another, which for chimeracrafters is evidence it is not possible² to create on different acts two individuals of the same species (ie. two individuals that are able to breed between themselves).



                          .



                          ¹ The creation of sphinx by the Ancients show us that they were even able to create sphinxes even without corn, although no corn-free recipe is known today.



                          ² At this point this usually rises a theological discussion on God's omnipotence when there are educated listeners in the room, which leads to their official position stating just that doing so would be extremely complicated and doing things this other way was a much more simple and elegant action from our Creator.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$

















                            3












                            $begingroup$

                            Each time you make a chimera you are creating a new species



                            Some simple people think that for making a basic sphinx you only need to mix a human and a lion. That somehow you mix both and the result will always be a sphinx. Those that hold such views reveal their uttermost ignorance of the art of chimeracraftship. For it is clear for even the most dumb, that when mixing a person with a lion you could end up with a creature having the head of a lion and a body of a human as much as a one with the head of a human and the body of a lion. Or a lion with an additional pair of human arms, or a person with lion tail, the possibilities are countless. And that is only taking into account the parts of the creatures that will be mixed.



                            The reality is that the floor lines, the ingredients put around them, and even the chantics themselves are part of the chimeras. They are not some "instructions" for how should the animals mix, but actually become part of them.



                            Now, it is true that the effect of some ingredients doesn't a big influence on the creature, for instance having a greater number of corn grains will generally just result in a more yellow fur in the resulting sphinx¹ and a proficient summoner is usually able to obtain a decent result even with suboptimal ingredients (like fruit non being fresh), at the cost of a longer process and putting more of its power into the transmutation.



                            But the fact is that everything taking part on the invocation, from the disposition of the ingredients, the exact intonation, rhythm and pauses used by the summoner, to the original themselves take a crucial role in the forming of the new species. Thus, even though they are all classified as sphinxes, each and every one of them is its own specie, as they have their own lineage (which will only ever have a single individual, sadly).



                            A few chimera creators have done some experiments trying to create two distinct individuals from the same species, usually by having two summoners build the same type of chimera at the same time, with the same ingredients and using pairs of animals of the same litter. So far with no success.



                            On the other hand, this is mostly an academic question with most summoners just accepting as a fact that the resulting animals will not be able to breed, and very happy it is this way, given the large profits they make from each chimera they create. Actually their guild would get very angry with anyone that proved otherwise.



                            Finally, note this is completely consistent that even on the Creation, Women and Men were not created separately but one from another, which for chimeracrafters is evidence it is not possible² to create on different acts two individuals of the same species (ie. two individuals that are able to breed between themselves).



                            .



                            ¹ The creation of sphinx by the Ancients show us that they were even able to create sphinxes even without corn, although no corn-free recipe is known today.



                            ² At this point this usually rises a theological discussion on God's omnipotence when there are educated listeners in the room, which leads to their official position stating just that doing so would be extremely complicated and doing things this other way was a much more simple and elegant action from our Creator.






                            share|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$















                              3












                              3








                              3





                              $begingroup$

                              Each time you make a chimera you are creating a new species



                              Some simple people think that for making a basic sphinx you only need to mix a human and a lion. That somehow you mix both and the result will always be a sphinx. Those that hold such views reveal their uttermost ignorance of the art of chimeracraftship. For it is clear for even the most dumb, that when mixing a person with a lion you could end up with a creature having the head of a lion and a body of a human as much as a one with the head of a human and the body of a lion. Or a lion with an additional pair of human arms, or a person with lion tail, the possibilities are countless. And that is only taking into account the parts of the creatures that will be mixed.



                              The reality is that the floor lines, the ingredients put around them, and even the chantics themselves are part of the chimeras. They are not some "instructions" for how should the animals mix, but actually become part of them.



                              Now, it is true that the effect of some ingredients doesn't a big influence on the creature, for instance having a greater number of corn grains will generally just result in a more yellow fur in the resulting sphinx¹ and a proficient summoner is usually able to obtain a decent result even with suboptimal ingredients (like fruit non being fresh), at the cost of a longer process and putting more of its power into the transmutation.



                              But the fact is that everything taking part on the invocation, from the disposition of the ingredients, the exact intonation, rhythm and pauses used by the summoner, to the original themselves take a crucial role in the forming of the new species. Thus, even though they are all classified as sphinxes, each and every one of them is its own specie, as they have their own lineage (which will only ever have a single individual, sadly).



                              A few chimera creators have done some experiments trying to create two distinct individuals from the same species, usually by having two summoners build the same type of chimera at the same time, with the same ingredients and using pairs of animals of the same litter. So far with no success.



                              On the other hand, this is mostly an academic question with most summoners just accepting as a fact that the resulting animals will not be able to breed, and very happy it is this way, given the large profits they make from each chimera they create. Actually their guild would get very angry with anyone that proved otherwise.



                              Finally, note this is completely consistent that even on the Creation, Women and Men were not created separately but one from another, which for chimeracrafters is evidence it is not possible² to create on different acts two individuals of the same species (ie. two individuals that are able to breed between themselves).



                              .



                              ¹ The creation of sphinx by the Ancients show us that they were even able to create sphinxes even without corn, although no corn-free recipe is known today.



                              ² At this point this usually rises a theological discussion on God's omnipotence when there are educated listeners in the room, which leads to their official position stating just that doing so would be extremely complicated and doing things this other way was a much more simple and elegant action from our Creator.






                              share|improve this answer









                              $endgroup$



                              Each time you make a chimera you are creating a new species



                              Some simple people think that for making a basic sphinx you only need to mix a human and a lion. That somehow you mix both and the result will always be a sphinx. Those that hold such views reveal their uttermost ignorance of the art of chimeracraftship. For it is clear for even the most dumb, that when mixing a person with a lion you could end up with a creature having the head of a lion and a body of a human as much as a one with the head of a human and the body of a lion. Or a lion with an additional pair of human arms, or a person with lion tail, the possibilities are countless. And that is only taking into account the parts of the creatures that will be mixed.



                              The reality is that the floor lines, the ingredients put around them, and even the chantics themselves are part of the chimeras. They are not some "instructions" for how should the animals mix, but actually become part of them.



                              Now, it is true that the effect of some ingredients doesn't a big influence on the creature, for instance having a greater number of corn grains will generally just result in a more yellow fur in the resulting sphinx¹ and a proficient summoner is usually able to obtain a decent result even with suboptimal ingredients (like fruit non being fresh), at the cost of a longer process and putting more of its power into the transmutation.



                              But the fact is that everything taking part on the invocation, from the disposition of the ingredients, the exact intonation, rhythm and pauses used by the summoner, to the original themselves take a crucial role in the forming of the new species. Thus, even though they are all classified as sphinxes, each and every one of them is its own specie, as they have their own lineage (which will only ever have a single individual, sadly).



                              A few chimera creators have done some experiments trying to create two distinct individuals from the same species, usually by having two summoners build the same type of chimera at the same time, with the same ingredients and using pairs of animals of the same litter. So far with no success.



                              On the other hand, this is mostly an academic question with most summoners just accepting as a fact that the resulting animals will not be able to breed, and very happy it is this way, given the large profits they make from each chimera they create. Actually their guild would get very angry with anyone that proved otherwise.



                              Finally, note this is completely consistent that even on the Creation, Women and Men were not created separately but one from another, which for chimeracrafters is evidence it is not possible² to create on different acts two individuals of the same species (ie. two individuals that are able to breed between themselves).



                              .



                              ¹ The creation of sphinx by the Ancients show us that they were even able to create sphinxes even without corn, although no corn-free recipe is known today.



                              ² At this point this usually rises a theological discussion on God's omnipotence when there are educated listeners in the room, which leads to their official position stating just that doing so would be extremely complicated and doing things this other way was a much more simple and elegant action from our Creator.







                              share|improve this answer












                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer










                              answered Jun 9 at 2:08









                              ÁngelÁngel

                              1,1206 silver badges8 bronze badges




                              1,1206 silver badges8 bronze badges





















                                  1












                                  $begingroup$

                                  Oh but they can breed. They just have the same problem as modern day bulldogs: they just don't have a shape that favours a tight fit.



                                  Or do you really picture a couple of these ones coupling?



                                  Chimera



                                  You've never seen sex capable chimeras for the same reason that Mosanto's crops are sterile: there is actual profit to be made if your customers always have to come back to you for more.






                                  share|improve this answer











                                  $endgroup$

















                                    1












                                    $begingroup$

                                    Oh but they can breed. They just have the same problem as modern day bulldogs: they just don't have a shape that favours a tight fit.



                                    Or do you really picture a couple of these ones coupling?



                                    Chimera



                                    You've never seen sex capable chimeras for the same reason that Mosanto's crops are sterile: there is actual profit to be made if your customers always have to come back to you for more.






                                    share|improve this answer











                                    $endgroup$















                                      1












                                      1








                                      1





                                      $begingroup$

                                      Oh but they can breed. They just have the same problem as modern day bulldogs: they just don't have a shape that favours a tight fit.



                                      Or do you really picture a couple of these ones coupling?



                                      Chimera



                                      You've never seen sex capable chimeras for the same reason that Mosanto's crops are sterile: there is actual profit to be made if your customers always have to come back to you for more.






                                      share|improve this answer











                                      $endgroup$



                                      Oh but they can breed. They just have the same problem as modern day bulldogs: they just don't have a shape that favours a tight fit.



                                      Or do you really picture a couple of these ones coupling?



                                      Chimera



                                      You've never seen sex capable chimeras for the same reason that Mosanto's crops are sterile: there is actual profit to be made if your customers always have to come back to you for more.







                                      share|improve this answer














                                      share|improve this answer



                                      share|improve this answer








                                      edited Jun 9 at 6:38

























                                      answered Jun 9 at 6:32









                                      RenanRenan

                                      59.6k17 gold badges137 silver badges294 bronze badges




                                      59.6k17 gold badges137 silver badges294 bronze badges



























                                          draft saved

                                          draft discarded
















































                                          Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


                                          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                          But avoid


                                          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded














                                          StackExchange.ready(
                                          function ()
                                          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f148543%2fwhat-would-prevent-chimeras-from-reproducing-with-each-other%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                          );

                                          Post as a guest















                                          Required, but never shown





















































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown

































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          How to write a 12-bar blues melodyI-IV-V blues progressionHow to play the bridges in a standard blues progressionHow does Gdim7 fit in C# minor?question on a certain chord progressionMusicology of Melody12 bar blues, spread rhythm: alternative to 6th chord to avoid finger stretchChord progressions/ Root key/ MelodiesHow to put chords (POP-EDM) under a given lead vocal melody (starting from a good knowledge in music theory)Are there “rules” for improvising with the minor pentatonic scale over 12-bar shuffle?Confusion about blues scale and chords

                                          What if the end-user didn't have the required library?What is setup.py?What is a clean, pythonic way to have multiple constructors in Python?What does Ruby have that Python doesn't, and vice versa?What is the reason for having '//' in Python?How do I create a namespace package in Python?How to package shared objects that python modules depend on?setuptools vs. distutils: why is distutils still a thing?Navigation in Windows 10 vs code not going to virtualenv library when the same library is installed at user levelPython create package for local usePackaging a project that uses multiple python versionsWhy is permission denied on pip install except for when “--user” is included at end of command?

                                          Why did Thanos need his ship to help him in the battle scene?Which actor plays Thanos in the Avengers mid-credits scene?Are there economic implications portrayed in comics where the buildings and cities are ruined almost daily?Old X-Men comic where team travels to alien world with a ring-like sun that needs recharging?Why does Ego need help sleeping?Is there an objective answer to who “the strongest Avenger” is?How did Banner get unstuck?Why did Thanos get hit?How did Thanos (or anyone) know the Infinity Stones would give him this power?Did Thanos leave Eitri alive for his after-sales service?In Avengers 1, why does Thanos need Loki?