How does Madhvacharya interpret Bhagavad Gita sloka 18.66? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHow to start reading Bhagavad Gita?Why does only Uppiliappan have “Mam Ekam Saranam Vraja” written on his hand?Does Albert Einsteen Really Read Bhagavad Gita?Prapatti-Yog (Surrender) is higher than Bhakti ,Karma & Gyan Yog?Does Bhagavad Gita detest atheists?BG 14.8 - What is the source of the scriptural definition of “mode of ignorance”?How many types of Vaishnava Charama Shloka(s) exist?Does Bhagavad Gita Sloka 17.23 refer to Brahmanas or Brahmins?How do Advaitins interpret Bhagavad Gita 7.24?What does other sects & acharyas believe in Bhagavad Gita 7.19 Sloka except Vasinava Acharayas or Sects?
If Nick Fury and Coulson already knew about aliens (Kree and Skrull) why did they wait until Thor's appearance to start making weapons?
Help understanding this unsettling image of Titan, Epimetheus, and Saturn's rings?
What steps are necessary to read a Modern SSD in Medieval Europe?
Are the names of these months realistic?
Man transported from Alternate World into ours by a Neutrino Detector
What was Carter Burke's job for "the company" in Aliens?
The Ultimate Number Sequence Puzzle
From jafe to El-Guest
How to get the last not-null value in an ordered column of a huge table?
Is it okay to majorly distort historical facts while writing a fiction story?
How to use ReplaceAll on an expression that contains a rule
Is it correct to say moon starry nights?
Expressing the idea of having a very busy time
Towers in the ocean; How deep can they be built?
What are the unusually-enlarged wing sections on this P-38 Lightning?
Why is information "lost" when it got into a black hole?
Reshaping json / reparing json inside shell script (remove trailing comma)
Airplane gently rocking its wings during whole flight
Lucky Feat: How can "more than one creature spend a luck point to influence the outcome of a roll"?
Help! I cannot understand this game’s notations!
Help/tips for a first time writer?
How to Implement Deterministic Encryption Safely in .NET
Can I calculate next year's exemptions based on this year's refund/amount owed?
Purpose of level-shifter with same in and out voltages
How does Madhvacharya interpret Bhagavad Gita sloka 18.66?
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHow to start reading Bhagavad Gita?Why does only Uppiliappan have “Mam Ekam Saranam Vraja” written on his hand?Does Albert Einsteen Really Read Bhagavad Gita?Prapatti-Yog (Surrender) is higher than Bhakti ,Karma & Gyan Yog?Does Bhagavad Gita detest atheists?BG 14.8 - What is the source of the scriptural definition of “mode of ignorance”?How many types of Vaishnava Charama Shloka(s) exist?Does Bhagavad Gita Sloka 17.23 refer to Brahmanas or Brahmins?How do Advaitins interpret Bhagavad Gita 7.24?What does other sects & acharyas believe in Bhagavad Gita 7.19 Sloka except Vasinava Acharayas or Sects?
How does Madhvacharya interpret Bhagavad Gita sloka 18.66?
18.66 sarva-dharmān parityajya
mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja
ahaṁ tvāṁ sarva-pāpebhyo
mokṣayiṣyāmi mā śucaḥ
Abandon all varieties of religion and just surrender unto Me. I shall deliver you from all sinful reactions. Do not fear.
For example, here is how Ramanujacharya interprets it in his Bhagavad Gita commentary:
'Relinquishing all Dharmas’ — means the complete abandonment of the notion of agency,
proprietorship, results etc., in the practice of Karma, Jñāna and Bhakti Yogas which are the
means (dharmas) for attaining the highest good when done as Divine Service.
'I will release you from all sins' — means that I will free you from all obstacles that
prevent you from attaining Me; consisting of [the karmic reaction of] innumerable acts of
doing what is forbidden and neglecting what is bidden. Accumulating from beginingless
times [the reactions of] these deeds cause obstacles in spiritual development.
bhagavad-gita ramanujacharya madhvacharya
asked yesterday
IkshvakuIkshvaku
6,243434
|
show 1 more comment
How does Madhvacharya interpret Bhagavad Gita sloka 18.66?
18.66 sarva-dharmān parityajya
mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja
ahaṁ tvāṁ sarva-pāpebhyo
mokṣayiṣyāmi mā śucaḥ
Abandon all varieties of religion and just surrender unto Me. I shall deliver you from all sinful reactions. Do not fear.
For example, here is how Ramanujacharya interprets it in his Bhagavad Gita commentary:
'Relinquishing all Dharmas’ — means the complete abandonment of the notion of agency,
proprietorship, results etc., in the practice of Karma, Jñāna and Bhakti Yogas which are the
means (dharmas) for attaining the highest good when done as Divine Service.
'I will release you from all sins' — means that I will free you from all obstacles that
prevent you from attaining Me; consisting of [the karmic reaction of] innumerable acts of
doing what is forbidden and neglecting what is bidden. Accumulating from beginingless
times [the reactions of] these deeds cause obstacles in spiritual development.
bhagavad-gita ramanujacharya madhvacharya
asked yesterday
IkshvakuIkshvaku
6,243434
bhagavad-gita.us/bhagavad-gita-18-66 Check here..
– Krishna Varna
yesterday
1
I think he wrote more than 1 commentary. The one shared in answer seems to be brief commentary. Otherwise how will such important shloka be commented in just 2 lines??
– Krishna Varna
yesterday
1
Just do a Google search.. He wrote 2 commentaries..when every one commented at length, why will madhvacharya comment in just 2 lines.. Basic common sense also. google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://… ..jump to page 3..
– Krishna Varna
yesterday
1
@KrishnaVarna Basic common sense is not common to all.How many Acharyas wrote two commentaries?
– Pratimaputra
yesterday
1
@KrishnaVarna btw do you know the difference between commentary and subcommentary?
– Pratimaputra
yesterday
|
show 1 more comment
How does Madhvacharya interpret Bhagavad Gita sloka 18.66?
18.66 sarva-dharmān parityajya
mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja
ahaṁ tvāṁ sarva-pāpebhyo
mokṣayiṣyāmi mā śucaḥ
Abandon all varieties of religion and just surrender unto Me. I shall deliver you from all sinful reactions. Do not fear.
For example, here is how Ramanujacharya interprets it in his Bhagavad Gita commentary:
'Relinquishing all Dharmas’ — means the complete abandonment of the notion of agency,
proprietorship, results etc., in the practice of Karma, Jñāna and Bhakti Yogas which are the
means (dharmas) for attaining the highest good when done as Divine Service.
'I will release you from all sins' — means that I will free you from all obstacles that
prevent you from attaining Me; consisting of [the karmic reaction of] innumerable acts of
doing what is forbidden and neglecting what is bidden. Accumulating from beginingless
times [the reactions of] these deeds cause obstacles in spiritual development.
bhagavad-gita ramanujacharya madhvacharya
asked yesterday
IkshvakuIkshvaku
6,243434
How does Madhvacharya interpret Bhagavad Gita sloka 18.66?
18.66 sarva-dharmān parityajya
mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja
ahaṁ tvāṁ sarva-pāpebhyo
mokṣayiṣyāmi mā śucaḥ
Abandon all varieties of religion and just surrender unto Me. I shall deliver you from all sinful reactions. Do not fear.
For example, here is how Ramanujacharya interprets it in his Bhagavad Gita commentary:
'Relinquishing all Dharmas’ — means the complete abandonment of the notion of agency,
proprietorship, results etc., in the practice of Karma, Jñāna and Bhakti Yogas which are the
means (dharmas) for attaining the highest good when done as Divine Service.
'I will release you from all sins' — means that I will free you from all obstacles that
prevent you from attaining Me; consisting of [the karmic reaction of] innumerable acts of
doing what is forbidden and neglecting what is bidden. Accumulating from beginingless
times [the reactions of] these deeds cause obstacles in spiritual development.
bhagavad-gita ramanujacharya madhvacharya
bhagavad-gita ramanujacharya madhvacharya
asked yesterday
IkshvakuIkshvaku
6,243434
asked yesterday
IkshvakuIkshvaku
6,243434
asked yesterday
IkshvakuIkshvaku
6,243434
asked yesterday
IkshvakuIkshvaku
6,243434
asked yesterday
IkshvakuIkshvaku
6,243434
6,243434
bhagavad-gita.us/bhagavad-gita-18-66 Check here..
– Krishna Varna
yesterday
1
I think he wrote more than 1 commentary. The one shared in answer seems to be brief commentary. Otherwise how will such important shloka be commented in just 2 lines??
– Krishna Varna
yesterday
1
Just do a Google search.. He wrote 2 commentaries..when every one commented at length, why will madhvacharya comment in just 2 lines.. Basic common sense also. google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://… ..jump to page 3..
– Krishna Varna
yesterday
1
@KrishnaVarna Basic common sense is not common to all.How many Acharyas wrote two commentaries?
– Pratimaputra
yesterday
1
@KrishnaVarna btw do you know the difference between commentary and subcommentary?
– Pratimaputra
yesterday
|
show 1 more comment
bhagavad-gita.us/bhagavad-gita-18-66 Check here..
– Krishna Varna
yesterday
1
I think he wrote more than 1 commentary. The one shared in answer seems to be brief commentary. Otherwise how will such important shloka be commented in just 2 lines??
– Krishna Varna
yesterday
1
Just do a Google search.. He wrote 2 commentaries..when every one commented at length, why will madhvacharya comment in just 2 lines.. Basic common sense also. google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://… ..jump to page 3..
– Krishna Varna
yesterday
1
@KrishnaVarna Basic common sense is not common to all.How many Acharyas wrote two commentaries?
– Pratimaputra
yesterday
1
@KrishnaVarna btw do you know the difference between commentary and subcommentary?
– Pratimaputra
yesterday
bhagavad-gita.us/bhagavad-gita-18-66 Check here..
– Krishna Varna
yesterday
bhagavad-gita.us/bhagavad-gita-18-66 Check here..
– Krishna Varna
yesterday
1
1
I think he wrote more than 1 commentary. The one shared in answer seems to be brief commentary. Otherwise how will such important shloka be commented in just 2 lines??
– Krishna Varna
yesterday
I think he wrote more than 1 commentary. The one shared in answer seems to be brief commentary. Otherwise how will such important shloka be commented in just 2 lines??
– Krishna Varna
yesterday
1
1
Just do a Google search.. He wrote 2 commentaries..when every one commented at length, why will madhvacharya comment in just 2 lines.. Basic common sense also. google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://… ..jump to page 3..
– Krishna Varna
yesterday
Just do a Google search.. He wrote 2 commentaries..when every one commented at length, why will madhvacharya comment in just 2 lines.. Basic common sense also. google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://… ..jump to page 3..
– Krishna Varna
yesterday
1
1
@KrishnaVarna Basic common sense is not common to all.How many Acharyas wrote two commentaries?
– Pratimaputra
yesterday
@KrishnaVarna Basic common sense is not common to all.How many Acharyas wrote two commentaries?
– Pratimaputra
yesterday
1
1
@KrishnaVarna btw do you know the difference between commentary and subcommentary?
– Pratimaputra
yesterday
@KrishnaVarna btw do you know the difference between commentary and subcommentary?
– Pratimaputra
yesterday
|
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Sri Madhvacharya has written a very brief commentary
18.66।।धर्मत्यागः फलत्यागः। कथमन्यथा युद्धविधिः।यस्तु कर्मफलत्यागी स त्यागीत्यभिधीयते [18।11] इति चोक्तम्। dharmatyAgah falatyagah. katham anyathA yiddhavidhih. yastu karmafalatyAgi sa tyAgi iti abhidhiyate (Gita 18/11). eti cha uktam.
Meaning : surrending dharma means surrendering the fruits/results. Otherwise how [can one speak of] methods in the battle? He who renounces the fruits of karma is a real tyAgi, as says the Gita(18/11). And this is said.
Reference : https://www.gitasupersite.iitk.ac.in/srimad?language=dv&field_chapter_value=18&field_nsutra_value=66&scmad=1&choose=1
UPDATE
According to another website, Maddhva's commentary of the sloka is
Here Lord Krishna reveals the conclusion to the essence of all knowledge. The most confidential of all knowledge that is confidential. Sarva-dharma parityagya means renouncing all conceptions of what one thinks or imagines religiosity to be. This does not mean to renounce righteousness for righteousness to all jivas or embodied beings is always attuned and in harmony with the Supreme Lord. The ultimate goal of all religious and spiritual conceptions is communion with the Supreme Lord Krishna. To achieve this one must first have realisation of their atma or immortal soul within the etheric heart. After surrendering and taking exclusive refuge in Him alone one is blessed by the Supreme Lord and by His grace, He, Himself will accomplish this for His devotee.
Reference : https://www.bhagavad-gita.us/bhagavad-gita-18-66/
I personally however would go with the first one as I find that site to be the most authentic and it has given the original commentary in sanskrit.
According to the pdf of the entire commentary available on https://sreenivasaraos.com/tag/gita-according-to-madhva/, it is clear that MADHVA WROTE THE FIRST ONE. I am also adding what is written in the 'TAtparya-nirNaya' of the commentary as image.
answered yesterday
PratimaputraPratimaputra
8,828744
Thanks. Do you know what Madhvacharya thinks about the "mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja" part of the sloka?
– Ikshvaku
yesterday
Oh ok. Yeah Madhvas don't put much importance on this sloka like Sri Vaishnavas do.
– Ikshvaku
yesterday
This is different from his commentary listed on this site: bhagavad-gita.us/bhagavad-gita-18-66
– Ikshvaku
yesterday
Refuse to believe what?
– Ikshvaku
yesterday
According to @KrishnaVarna Madhvacharya wrote 2 commentaries. Check the comments in the OP.
– Ikshvaku
yesterday
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sri Madhvacharya has written a very brief commentary
18.66।।धर्मत्यागः फलत्यागः। कथमन्यथा युद्धविधिः।यस्तु कर्मफलत्यागी स त्यागीत्यभिधीयते [18।11] इति चोक्तम्। dharmatyAgah falatyagah. katham anyathA yiddhavidhih. yastu karmafalatyAgi sa tyAgi iti abhidhiyate (Gita 18/11). eti cha uktam.
Meaning : surrending dharma means surrendering the fruits/results. Otherwise how [can one speak of] methods in the battle? He who renounces the fruits of karma is a real tyAgi, as says the Gita(18/11). And this is said.
Reference : https://www.gitasupersite.iitk.ac.in/srimad?language=dv&field_chapter_value=18&field_nsutra_value=66&scmad=1&choose=1
UPDATE
According to another website, Maddhva's commentary of the sloka is
Here Lord Krishna reveals the conclusion to the essence of all knowledge. The most confidential of all knowledge that is confidential. Sarva-dharma parityagya means renouncing all conceptions of what one thinks or imagines religiosity to be. This does not mean to renounce righteousness for righteousness to all jivas or embodied beings is always attuned and in harmony with the Supreme Lord. The ultimate goal of all religious and spiritual conceptions is communion with the Supreme Lord Krishna. To achieve this one must first have realisation of their atma or immortal soul within the etheric heart. After surrendering and taking exclusive refuge in Him alone one is blessed by the Supreme Lord and by His grace, He, Himself will accomplish this for His devotee.
Reference : https://www.bhagavad-gita.us/bhagavad-gita-18-66/
I personally however would go with the first one as I find that site to be the most authentic and it has given the original commentary in sanskrit.
According to the pdf of the entire commentary available on https://sreenivasaraos.com/tag/gita-according-to-madhva/, it is clear that MADHVA WROTE THE FIRST ONE. I am also adding what is written in the 'TAtparya-nirNaya' of the commentary as image.
answered yesterday
PratimaputraPratimaputra
8,828744
Thanks. Do you know what Madhvacharya thinks about the "mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja" part of the sloka?
– Ikshvaku
yesterday
Oh ok. Yeah Madhvas don't put much importance on this sloka like Sri Vaishnavas do.
– Ikshvaku
yesterday
This is different from his commentary listed on this site: bhagavad-gita.us/bhagavad-gita-18-66
– Ikshvaku
yesterday
Refuse to believe what?
– Ikshvaku
yesterday
According to @KrishnaVarna Madhvacharya wrote 2 commentaries. Check the comments in the OP.
– Ikshvaku
yesterday
add a comment |
Sri Madhvacharya has written a very brief commentary
18.66।।धर्मत्यागः फलत्यागः। कथमन्यथा युद्धविधिः।यस्तु कर्मफलत्यागी स त्यागीत्यभिधीयते [18।11] इति चोक्तम्। dharmatyAgah falatyagah. katham anyathA yiddhavidhih. yastu karmafalatyAgi sa tyAgi iti abhidhiyate (Gita 18/11). eti cha uktam.
Meaning : surrending dharma means surrendering the fruits/results. Otherwise how [can one speak of] methods in the battle? He who renounces the fruits of karma is a real tyAgi, as says the Gita(18/11). And this is said.
Reference : https://www.gitasupersite.iitk.ac.in/srimad?language=dv&field_chapter_value=18&field_nsutra_value=66&scmad=1&choose=1
UPDATE
According to another website, Maddhva's commentary of the sloka is
Here Lord Krishna reveals the conclusion to the essence of all knowledge. The most confidential of all knowledge that is confidential. Sarva-dharma parityagya means renouncing all conceptions of what one thinks or imagines religiosity to be. This does not mean to renounce righteousness for righteousness to all jivas or embodied beings is always attuned and in harmony with the Supreme Lord. The ultimate goal of all religious and spiritual conceptions is communion with the Supreme Lord Krishna. To achieve this one must first have realisation of their atma or immortal soul within the etheric heart. After surrendering and taking exclusive refuge in Him alone one is blessed by the Supreme Lord and by His grace, He, Himself will accomplish this for His devotee.
Reference : https://www.bhagavad-gita.us/bhagavad-gita-18-66/
I personally however would go with the first one as I find that site to be the most authentic and it has given the original commentary in sanskrit.
According to the pdf of the entire commentary available on https://sreenivasaraos.com/tag/gita-according-to-madhva/, it is clear that MADHVA WROTE THE FIRST ONE. I am also adding what is written in the 'TAtparya-nirNaya' of the commentary as image.
answered yesterday
PratimaputraPratimaputra
8,828744
Thanks. Do you know what Madhvacharya thinks about the "mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja" part of the sloka?
– Ikshvaku
yesterday
Oh ok. Yeah Madhvas don't put much importance on this sloka like Sri Vaishnavas do.
– Ikshvaku
yesterday
This is different from his commentary listed on this site: bhagavad-gita.us/bhagavad-gita-18-66
– Ikshvaku
yesterday
Refuse to believe what?
– Ikshvaku
yesterday
According to @KrishnaVarna Madhvacharya wrote 2 commentaries. Check the comments in the OP.
– Ikshvaku
yesterday
add a comment |
Sri Madhvacharya has written a very brief commentary
18.66।।धर्मत्यागः फलत्यागः। कथमन्यथा युद्धविधिः।यस्तु कर्मफलत्यागी स त्यागीत्यभिधीयते [18।11] इति चोक्तम्। dharmatyAgah falatyagah. katham anyathA yiddhavidhih. yastu karmafalatyAgi sa tyAgi iti abhidhiyate (Gita 18/11). eti cha uktam.
Meaning : surrending dharma means surrendering the fruits/results. Otherwise how [can one speak of] methods in the battle? He who renounces the fruits of karma is a real tyAgi, as says the Gita(18/11). And this is said.
Reference : https://www.gitasupersite.iitk.ac.in/srimad?language=dv&field_chapter_value=18&field_nsutra_value=66&scmad=1&choose=1
UPDATE
According to another website, Maddhva's commentary of the sloka is
Here Lord Krishna reveals the conclusion to the essence of all knowledge. The most confidential of all knowledge that is confidential. Sarva-dharma parityagya means renouncing all conceptions of what one thinks or imagines religiosity to be. This does not mean to renounce righteousness for righteousness to all jivas or embodied beings is always attuned and in harmony with the Supreme Lord. The ultimate goal of all religious and spiritual conceptions is communion with the Supreme Lord Krishna. To achieve this one must first have realisation of their atma or immortal soul within the etheric heart. After surrendering and taking exclusive refuge in Him alone one is blessed by the Supreme Lord and by His grace, He, Himself will accomplish this for His devotee.
Reference : https://www.bhagavad-gita.us/bhagavad-gita-18-66/
I personally however would go with the first one as I find that site to be the most authentic and it has given the original commentary in sanskrit.
According to the pdf of the entire commentary available on https://sreenivasaraos.com/tag/gita-according-to-madhva/, it is clear that MADHVA WROTE THE FIRST ONE. I am also adding what is written in the 'TAtparya-nirNaya' of the commentary as image.
answered yesterday
PratimaputraPratimaputra
8,828744
Sri Madhvacharya has written a very brief commentary
18.66।।धर्मत्यागः फलत्यागः। कथमन्यथा युद्धविधिः।यस्तु कर्मफलत्यागी स त्यागीत्यभिधीयते [18।11] इति चोक्तम्। dharmatyAgah falatyagah. katham anyathA yiddhavidhih. yastu karmafalatyAgi sa tyAgi iti abhidhiyate (Gita 18/11). eti cha uktam.
Meaning : surrending dharma means surrendering the fruits/results. Otherwise how [can one speak of] methods in the battle? He who renounces the fruits of karma is a real tyAgi, as says the Gita(18/11). And this is said.
Reference : https://www.gitasupersite.iitk.ac.in/srimad?language=dv&field_chapter_value=18&field_nsutra_value=66&scmad=1&choose=1
UPDATE
According to another website, Maddhva's commentary of the sloka is
Here Lord Krishna reveals the conclusion to the essence of all knowledge. The most confidential of all knowledge that is confidential. Sarva-dharma parityagya means renouncing all conceptions of what one thinks or imagines religiosity to be. This does not mean to renounce righteousness for righteousness to all jivas or embodied beings is always attuned and in harmony with the Supreme Lord. The ultimate goal of all religious and spiritual conceptions is communion with the Supreme Lord Krishna. To achieve this one must first have realisation of their atma or immortal soul within the etheric heart. After surrendering and taking exclusive refuge in Him alone one is blessed by the Supreme Lord and by His grace, He, Himself will accomplish this for His devotee.
Reference : https://www.bhagavad-gita.us/bhagavad-gita-18-66/
I personally however would go with the first one as I find that site to be the most authentic and it has given the original commentary in sanskrit.
According to the pdf of the entire commentary available on https://sreenivasaraos.com/tag/gita-according-to-madhva/, it is clear that MADHVA WROTE THE FIRST ONE. I am also adding what is written in the 'TAtparya-nirNaya' of the commentary as image.
answered yesterday
PratimaputraPratimaputra
8,828744
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
PratimaputraPratimaputra
8,828744
answered yesterday
PratimaputraPratimaputra
8,828744
answered yesterday
PratimaputraPratimaputra
8,828744
8,828744
Thanks. Do you know what Madhvacharya thinks about the "mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja" part of the sloka?
– Ikshvaku
yesterday
Oh ok. Yeah Madhvas don't put much importance on this sloka like Sri Vaishnavas do.
– Ikshvaku
yesterday
This is different from his commentary listed on this site: bhagavad-gita.us/bhagavad-gita-18-66
– Ikshvaku
yesterday
Refuse to believe what?
– Ikshvaku
yesterday
According to @KrishnaVarna Madhvacharya wrote 2 commentaries. Check the comments in the OP.
– Ikshvaku
yesterday
add a comment |
Thanks. Do you know what Madhvacharya thinks about the "mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja" part of the sloka?
– Ikshvaku
yesterday
Oh ok. Yeah Madhvas don't put much importance on this sloka like Sri Vaishnavas do.
– Ikshvaku
yesterday
This is different from his commentary listed on this site: bhagavad-gita.us/bhagavad-gita-18-66
– Ikshvaku
yesterday
Refuse to believe what?
– Ikshvaku
yesterday
According to @KrishnaVarna Madhvacharya wrote 2 commentaries. Check the comments in the OP.
– Ikshvaku
yesterday
Thanks. Do you know what Madhvacharya thinks about the "mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja" part of the sloka?
– Ikshvaku
yesterday
Thanks. Do you know what Madhvacharya thinks about the "mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja" part of the sloka?
– Ikshvaku
yesterday
Oh ok. Yeah Madhvas don't put much importance on this sloka like Sri Vaishnavas do.
– Ikshvaku
yesterday
Oh ok. Yeah Madhvas don't put much importance on this sloka like Sri Vaishnavas do.
– Ikshvaku
yesterday
This is different from his commentary listed on this site: bhagavad-gita.us/bhagavad-gita-18-66
– Ikshvaku
yesterday
This is different from his commentary listed on this site: bhagavad-gita.us/bhagavad-gita-18-66
– Ikshvaku
yesterday
Refuse to believe what?
– Ikshvaku
yesterday
Refuse to believe what?
– Ikshvaku
yesterday
According to @KrishnaVarna Madhvacharya wrote 2 commentaries. Check the comments in the OP.
– Ikshvaku
yesterday
According to @KrishnaVarna Madhvacharya wrote 2 commentaries. Check the comments in the OP.
– Ikshvaku
yesterday
add a comment |
bhagavad-gita.us/bhagavad-gita-18-66 Check here..
– Krishna Varna
yesterday
1
I think he wrote more than 1 commentary. The one shared in answer seems to be brief commentary. Otherwise how will such important shloka be commented in just 2 lines??
– Krishna Varna
yesterday
1
Just do a Google search.. He wrote 2 commentaries..when every one commented at length, why will madhvacharya comment in just 2 lines.. Basic common sense also. google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://… ..jump to page 3..
– Krishna Varna
yesterday
1
@KrishnaVarna Basic common sense is not common to all.How many Acharyas wrote two commentaries?
– Pratimaputra
yesterday
1
@KrishnaVarna btw do you know the difference between commentary and subcommentary?
– Pratimaputra
yesterday