How did the Amiga uses compare to uses for other personal computers in 1985? [on hold] The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHow could Amiga computers play 14 bit sound?How did the Amiga 500 left-side expansion port work?How do Amiga 600 CPU accelerators work?How did the Amiga 1000 WCS (write controlled store) for Kickstart work?Reason for the Amiga clock speedHow are Amiga libraries structured?How did the Amiga DCTV workAmiga-looking keyboard for PCHow to create fast an icon file for Amiga program in WB drawer?When were other inexpensive computers able to recreate “The Amiga Juggler”?

Multi tool use
Multi tool use

Read/write a pipe-delimited file line by line with some simple text manipulation

What happens if you break a law in another country outside of that country?

How can I prove that a state of equilibrium is unstable?

How to show a landlord what we have in savings?

Strange use of "whether ... than ..." in official text

Arity of Primitive Recursive Functions

Planeswalker Ability and Death Timing

Is a distribution that is normal, but highly skewed, considered Gaussian?

Would a grinding machine be a simple and workable propulsion system for an interplanetary spacecraft?

How do I secure a TV wall mount?

How should I connect my cat5 cable to connectors having an orange-green line?

Find the majority element, which appears more than half the time

How can I separate the number from the unit in argument?

What is the difference between 'contrib' and 'non-free' packages repositories?

Does int main() need a declaration on C++?

Why does the freezing point matter when picking cooler ice packs?

My ex-girlfriend uses my Apple ID to login to her iPad, do I have to give her my Apple ID password to reset it?

That's an odd coin - I wonder why

Could a dragon use its wings to swim?

Is it "common practice in Fourier transform spectroscopy to multiply the measured interferogram by an apodizing function"? If so, why?

Early programmable calculators with RS-232

Does Germany produce more waste than the US?

What does this strange code stamp on my passport mean?

How to pronounce fünf in 45



How did the Amiga uses compare to uses for other personal computers in 1985? [on hold]



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHow could Amiga computers play 14 bit sound?How did the Amiga 500 left-side expansion port work?How do Amiga 600 CPU accelerators work?How did the Amiga 1000 WCS (write controlled store) for Kickstart work?Reason for the Amiga clock speedHow are Amiga libraries structured?How did the Amiga DCTV workAmiga-looking keyboard for PCHow to create fast an icon file for Amiga program in WB drawer?When were other inexpensive computers able to recreate “The Amiga Juggler”?










7















The Amiga 1000 came out in July 1985. This was an era in which personal computers were designed by their manufacturers to meet a unique set of bespoke requirements. For example, some computers came with advanced hardware for sound (for the time), while others had very primitive support for a "beeper".



It seems reasonable to conclude that personal computer buyers of this era tended to choose a system that focused on the hardware/software features that they felt were important for their own "use cases". Again, using the example of built-in audio support, a musician would be inclined toward a machine with more advanced audio capabilities. So would a gamer.



My question is what sort of use cases in 1985 led buyers toward purchasing an Amiga, and why would it be a better choice for those particular use cases than the PC, Macintosh, or Atari ST?










share|improve this question















put on hold as too broad by Raffzahn, Bruce Abbott, pipe, Chenmunka yesterday


Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.






















    7















    The Amiga 1000 came out in July 1985. This was an era in which personal computers were designed by their manufacturers to meet a unique set of bespoke requirements. For example, some computers came with advanced hardware for sound (for the time), while others had very primitive support for a "beeper".



    It seems reasonable to conclude that personal computer buyers of this era tended to choose a system that focused on the hardware/software features that they felt were important for their own "use cases". Again, using the example of built-in audio support, a musician would be inclined toward a machine with more advanced audio capabilities. So would a gamer.



    My question is what sort of use cases in 1985 led buyers toward purchasing an Amiga, and why would it be a better choice for those particular use cases than the PC, Macintosh, or Atari ST?










    share|improve this question















    put on hold as too broad by Raffzahn, Bruce Abbott, pipe, Chenmunka yesterday


    Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




















      7












      7








      7


      1






      The Amiga 1000 came out in July 1985. This was an era in which personal computers were designed by their manufacturers to meet a unique set of bespoke requirements. For example, some computers came with advanced hardware for sound (for the time), while others had very primitive support for a "beeper".



      It seems reasonable to conclude that personal computer buyers of this era tended to choose a system that focused on the hardware/software features that they felt were important for their own "use cases". Again, using the example of built-in audio support, a musician would be inclined toward a machine with more advanced audio capabilities. So would a gamer.



      My question is what sort of use cases in 1985 led buyers toward purchasing an Amiga, and why would it be a better choice for those particular use cases than the PC, Macintosh, or Atari ST?










      share|improve this question
















      The Amiga 1000 came out in July 1985. This was an era in which personal computers were designed by their manufacturers to meet a unique set of bespoke requirements. For example, some computers came with advanced hardware for sound (for the time), while others had very primitive support for a "beeper".



      It seems reasonable to conclude that personal computer buyers of this era tended to choose a system that focused on the hardware/software features that they felt were important for their own "use cases". Again, using the example of built-in audio support, a musician would be inclined toward a machine with more advanced audio capabilities. So would a gamer.



      My question is what sort of use cases in 1985 led buyers toward purchasing an Amiga, and why would it be a better choice for those particular use cases than the PC, Macintosh, or Atari ST?







      amiga






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited yesterday









      Brian H

      17.4k64148




      17.4k64148










      asked yesterday









      Johannes BittnerJohannes Bittner

      343125




      343125




      put on hold as too broad by Raffzahn, Bruce Abbott, pipe, Chenmunka yesterday


      Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









      put on hold as too broad by Raffzahn, Bruce Abbott, pipe, Chenmunka yesterday


      Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer. Avoid asking multiple distinct questions at once. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          9














          It was like a cheaper yet color Macintosh with a command line interface available. Stereo sound, better graphics, multi-process -- everything but sustained, intelligent marketing. (Initial marketing was good, but it was like they spent all their marketing money up front and expected momentum to carry them from that point.) I'm writing from an American viewpoint -- other countries weren't stuck in a mindset limited to PC or Mac. I like to say it offered more in 1985 than Windows 95 would a decade later.



          The Atari ST won the high end music market with its standard MIDI interface. Unlike the Mac and PC, it could compete with the Amiga on price.



          PC and Mac had much better business software support, and other high end programs such as AutoCAD pretty much ignored the Amiga and ST.



          Probably the most well-known high-end Amiga software/hardware product was the Video Toaster from NewTek in 1987. It needed an Amiga 2000, which was a PC-looking machine with bus slots. It was a very popular video rendering system, and the graphics for the first couple of seasons of Babylon Five were produced with the Video Toaster and Amiga.






          share|improve this answer

























          • You could play awesome games on it but it crashed a lot. That's what I remember. All the biggest anime nerds back in the day would get the toaster and do their own subtitles. That's the other thing.

            – Todd Wilcox
            yesterday












          • @ToddWilcox heh, how did I forget games? 😶 I did not experience the frequent crashes you mention. If anything, it seemed the Amiga was more stable than PC clones at the time. When you consider the large selection of programs using interprocess communication, the programmers had to focus on robustness of their programs for their work to be useful in such a dynamic environment.

            – RichF
            yesterday


















          4














          It was the only 16-bit computer with more than simplistic memory-mapped video hardware, with sprites reminiscent of the gaming-oriented 6502 processor color home computers (Atari 2600 and upwards and Commodore 64) but scaled upwards and separate "blitting" processing that could do the equivalent of sprites on bitmaps but with hardware acceleration. It had actual serious multitasking/processing. Compared to the state of technology, it was a very solid move forward from home computers to larger processing power and matching operating systems. "Personal computers", in contrast, highlighted the "business" angle and you'd see them advertised more likely with snapshots of spreadsheets than games.



          It's possible that the high pricing of color monitors with reasonable resolution confined affordable reasonably ergonomic "computing" to monochrome displays, leaving color personal computers stuck with the display parameters of color TV sets which they strove to be compatible with.



          The Macintosh with its built-in screen kept with monochrome (and CPU-manipulated bitmaps) for a long time, too.



          So the Amiga was pretty much square where the technological advances would position the progress of home computers and in a space, for whatever reason, without serious contenders. But for whatever reason, also without serious perspectives. It took some time before acceleration became a thing on PCs, and even then, its "sprite" support never grew beyond a hardware cursor. Instead blitting and later triangle shading and other stuff you'd expect GL to deliver became a thing and eventually got good enough to kill off Silicone Graphics Workstations, at one time the epitome of heavy-duty graphics processing (rather than game-based graphics which had a different focus).






          share|improve this answer





























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            9














            It was like a cheaper yet color Macintosh with a command line interface available. Stereo sound, better graphics, multi-process -- everything but sustained, intelligent marketing. (Initial marketing was good, but it was like they spent all their marketing money up front and expected momentum to carry them from that point.) I'm writing from an American viewpoint -- other countries weren't stuck in a mindset limited to PC or Mac. I like to say it offered more in 1985 than Windows 95 would a decade later.



            The Atari ST won the high end music market with its standard MIDI interface. Unlike the Mac and PC, it could compete with the Amiga on price.



            PC and Mac had much better business software support, and other high end programs such as AutoCAD pretty much ignored the Amiga and ST.



            Probably the most well-known high-end Amiga software/hardware product was the Video Toaster from NewTek in 1987. It needed an Amiga 2000, which was a PC-looking machine with bus slots. It was a very popular video rendering system, and the graphics for the first couple of seasons of Babylon Five were produced with the Video Toaster and Amiga.






            share|improve this answer

























            • You could play awesome games on it but it crashed a lot. That's what I remember. All the biggest anime nerds back in the day would get the toaster and do their own subtitles. That's the other thing.

              – Todd Wilcox
              yesterday












            • @ToddWilcox heh, how did I forget games? 😶 I did not experience the frequent crashes you mention. If anything, it seemed the Amiga was more stable than PC clones at the time. When you consider the large selection of programs using interprocess communication, the programmers had to focus on robustness of their programs for their work to be useful in such a dynamic environment.

              – RichF
              yesterday















            9














            It was like a cheaper yet color Macintosh with a command line interface available. Stereo sound, better graphics, multi-process -- everything but sustained, intelligent marketing. (Initial marketing was good, but it was like they spent all their marketing money up front and expected momentum to carry them from that point.) I'm writing from an American viewpoint -- other countries weren't stuck in a mindset limited to PC or Mac. I like to say it offered more in 1985 than Windows 95 would a decade later.



            The Atari ST won the high end music market with its standard MIDI interface. Unlike the Mac and PC, it could compete with the Amiga on price.



            PC and Mac had much better business software support, and other high end programs such as AutoCAD pretty much ignored the Amiga and ST.



            Probably the most well-known high-end Amiga software/hardware product was the Video Toaster from NewTek in 1987. It needed an Amiga 2000, which was a PC-looking machine with bus slots. It was a very popular video rendering system, and the graphics for the first couple of seasons of Babylon Five were produced with the Video Toaster and Amiga.






            share|improve this answer

























            • You could play awesome games on it but it crashed a lot. That's what I remember. All the biggest anime nerds back in the day would get the toaster and do their own subtitles. That's the other thing.

              – Todd Wilcox
              yesterday












            • @ToddWilcox heh, how did I forget games? 😶 I did not experience the frequent crashes you mention. If anything, it seemed the Amiga was more stable than PC clones at the time. When you consider the large selection of programs using interprocess communication, the programmers had to focus on robustness of their programs for their work to be useful in such a dynamic environment.

              – RichF
              yesterday













            9












            9








            9







            It was like a cheaper yet color Macintosh with a command line interface available. Stereo sound, better graphics, multi-process -- everything but sustained, intelligent marketing. (Initial marketing was good, but it was like they spent all their marketing money up front and expected momentum to carry them from that point.) I'm writing from an American viewpoint -- other countries weren't stuck in a mindset limited to PC or Mac. I like to say it offered more in 1985 than Windows 95 would a decade later.



            The Atari ST won the high end music market with its standard MIDI interface. Unlike the Mac and PC, it could compete with the Amiga on price.



            PC and Mac had much better business software support, and other high end programs such as AutoCAD pretty much ignored the Amiga and ST.



            Probably the most well-known high-end Amiga software/hardware product was the Video Toaster from NewTek in 1987. It needed an Amiga 2000, which was a PC-looking machine with bus slots. It was a very popular video rendering system, and the graphics for the first couple of seasons of Babylon Five were produced with the Video Toaster and Amiga.






            share|improve this answer















            It was like a cheaper yet color Macintosh with a command line interface available. Stereo sound, better graphics, multi-process -- everything but sustained, intelligent marketing. (Initial marketing was good, but it was like they spent all their marketing money up front and expected momentum to carry them from that point.) I'm writing from an American viewpoint -- other countries weren't stuck in a mindset limited to PC or Mac. I like to say it offered more in 1985 than Windows 95 would a decade later.



            The Atari ST won the high end music market with its standard MIDI interface. Unlike the Mac and PC, it could compete with the Amiga on price.



            PC and Mac had much better business software support, and other high end programs such as AutoCAD pretty much ignored the Amiga and ST.



            Probably the most well-known high-end Amiga software/hardware product was the Video Toaster from NewTek in 1987. It needed an Amiga 2000, which was a PC-looking machine with bus slots. It was a very popular video rendering system, and the graphics for the first couple of seasons of Babylon Five were produced with the Video Toaster and Amiga.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited yesterday

























            answered yesterday









            RichFRichF

            4,7511435




            4,7511435












            • You could play awesome games on it but it crashed a lot. That's what I remember. All the biggest anime nerds back in the day would get the toaster and do their own subtitles. That's the other thing.

              – Todd Wilcox
              yesterday












            • @ToddWilcox heh, how did I forget games? 😶 I did not experience the frequent crashes you mention. If anything, it seemed the Amiga was more stable than PC clones at the time. When you consider the large selection of programs using interprocess communication, the programmers had to focus on robustness of their programs for their work to be useful in such a dynamic environment.

              – RichF
              yesterday

















            • You could play awesome games on it but it crashed a lot. That's what I remember. All the biggest anime nerds back in the day would get the toaster and do their own subtitles. That's the other thing.

              – Todd Wilcox
              yesterday












            • @ToddWilcox heh, how did I forget games? 😶 I did not experience the frequent crashes you mention. If anything, it seemed the Amiga was more stable than PC clones at the time. When you consider the large selection of programs using interprocess communication, the programmers had to focus on robustness of their programs for their work to be useful in such a dynamic environment.

              – RichF
              yesterday
















            You could play awesome games on it but it crashed a lot. That's what I remember. All the biggest anime nerds back in the day would get the toaster and do their own subtitles. That's the other thing.

            – Todd Wilcox
            yesterday






            You could play awesome games on it but it crashed a lot. That's what I remember. All the biggest anime nerds back in the day would get the toaster and do their own subtitles. That's the other thing.

            – Todd Wilcox
            yesterday














            @ToddWilcox heh, how did I forget games? 😶 I did not experience the frequent crashes you mention. If anything, it seemed the Amiga was more stable than PC clones at the time. When you consider the large selection of programs using interprocess communication, the programmers had to focus on robustness of their programs for their work to be useful in such a dynamic environment.

            – RichF
            yesterday





            @ToddWilcox heh, how did I forget games? 😶 I did not experience the frequent crashes you mention. If anything, it seemed the Amiga was more stable than PC clones at the time. When you consider the large selection of programs using interprocess communication, the programmers had to focus on robustness of their programs for their work to be useful in such a dynamic environment.

            – RichF
            yesterday











            4














            It was the only 16-bit computer with more than simplistic memory-mapped video hardware, with sprites reminiscent of the gaming-oriented 6502 processor color home computers (Atari 2600 and upwards and Commodore 64) but scaled upwards and separate "blitting" processing that could do the equivalent of sprites on bitmaps but with hardware acceleration. It had actual serious multitasking/processing. Compared to the state of technology, it was a very solid move forward from home computers to larger processing power and matching operating systems. "Personal computers", in contrast, highlighted the "business" angle and you'd see them advertised more likely with snapshots of spreadsheets than games.



            It's possible that the high pricing of color monitors with reasonable resolution confined affordable reasonably ergonomic "computing" to monochrome displays, leaving color personal computers stuck with the display parameters of color TV sets which they strove to be compatible with.



            The Macintosh with its built-in screen kept with monochrome (and CPU-manipulated bitmaps) for a long time, too.



            So the Amiga was pretty much square where the technological advances would position the progress of home computers and in a space, for whatever reason, without serious contenders. But for whatever reason, also without serious perspectives. It took some time before acceleration became a thing on PCs, and even then, its "sprite" support never grew beyond a hardware cursor. Instead blitting and later triangle shading and other stuff you'd expect GL to deliver became a thing and eventually got good enough to kill off Silicone Graphics Workstations, at one time the epitome of heavy-duty graphics processing (rather than game-based graphics which had a different focus).






            share|improve this answer



























              4














              It was the only 16-bit computer with more than simplistic memory-mapped video hardware, with sprites reminiscent of the gaming-oriented 6502 processor color home computers (Atari 2600 and upwards and Commodore 64) but scaled upwards and separate "blitting" processing that could do the equivalent of sprites on bitmaps but with hardware acceleration. It had actual serious multitasking/processing. Compared to the state of technology, it was a very solid move forward from home computers to larger processing power and matching operating systems. "Personal computers", in contrast, highlighted the "business" angle and you'd see them advertised more likely with snapshots of spreadsheets than games.



              It's possible that the high pricing of color monitors with reasonable resolution confined affordable reasonably ergonomic "computing" to monochrome displays, leaving color personal computers stuck with the display parameters of color TV sets which they strove to be compatible with.



              The Macintosh with its built-in screen kept with monochrome (and CPU-manipulated bitmaps) for a long time, too.



              So the Amiga was pretty much square where the technological advances would position the progress of home computers and in a space, for whatever reason, without serious contenders. But for whatever reason, also without serious perspectives. It took some time before acceleration became a thing on PCs, and even then, its "sprite" support never grew beyond a hardware cursor. Instead blitting and later triangle shading and other stuff you'd expect GL to deliver became a thing and eventually got good enough to kill off Silicone Graphics Workstations, at one time the epitome of heavy-duty graphics processing (rather than game-based graphics which had a different focus).






              share|improve this answer

























                4












                4








                4







                It was the only 16-bit computer with more than simplistic memory-mapped video hardware, with sprites reminiscent of the gaming-oriented 6502 processor color home computers (Atari 2600 and upwards and Commodore 64) but scaled upwards and separate "blitting" processing that could do the equivalent of sprites on bitmaps but with hardware acceleration. It had actual serious multitasking/processing. Compared to the state of technology, it was a very solid move forward from home computers to larger processing power and matching operating systems. "Personal computers", in contrast, highlighted the "business" angle and you'd see them advertised more likely with snapshots of spreadsheets than games.



                It's possible that the high pricing of color monitors with reasonable resolution confined affordable reasonably ergonomic "computing" to monochrome displays, leaving color personal computers stuck with the display parameters of color TV sets which they strove to be compatible with.



                The Macintosh with its built-in screen kept with monochrome (and CPU-manipulated bitmaps) for a long time, too.



                So the Amiga was pretty much square where the technological advances would position the progress of home computers and in a space, for whatever reason, without serious contenders. But for whatever reason, also without serious perspectives. It took some time before acceleration became a thing on PCs, and even then, its "sprite" support never grew beyond a hardware cursor. Instead blitting and later triangle shading and other stuff you'd expect GL to deliver became a thing and eventually got good enough to kill off Silicone Graphics Workstations, at one time the epitome of heavy-duty graphics processing (rather than game-based graphics which had a different focus).






                share|improve this answer













                It was the only 16-bit computer with more than simplistic memory-mapped video hardware, with sprites reminiscent of the gaming-oriented 6502 processor color home computers (Atari 2600 and upwards and Commodore 64) but scaled upwards and separate "blitting" processing that could do the equivalent of sprites on bitmaps but with hardware acceleration. It had actual serious multitasking/processing. Compared to the state of technology, it was a very solid move forward from home computers to larger processing power and matching operating systems. "Personal computers", in contrast, highlighted the "business" angle and you'd see them advertised more likely with snapshots of spreadsheets than games.



                It's possible that the high pricing of color monitors with reasonable resolution confined affordable reasonably ergonomic "computing" to monochrome displays, leaving color personal computers stuck with the display parameters of color TV sets which they strove to be compatible with.



                The Macintosh with its built-in screen kept with monochrome (and CPU-manipulated bitmaps) for a long time, too.



                So the Amiga was pretty much square where the technological advances would position the progress of home computers and in a space, for whatever reason, without serious contenders. But for whatever reason, also without serious perspectives. It took some time before acceleration became a thing on PCs, and even then, its "sprite" support never grew beyond a hardware cursor. Instead blitting and later triangle shading and other stuff you'd expect GL to deliver became a thing and eventually got good enough to kill off Silicone Graphics Workstations, at one time the epitome of heavy-duty graphics processing (rather than game-based graphics which had a different focus).







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered yesterday







                user12177




















                    g8Irigwbzj iXfs9C12ypM,NKVCrAs hTtjJdG 67odbqT,lcaQ5se B6Vcu 6uyu9wA2MslPyjdwJcB68rr8YO,I4WmJ2 Gu
                    c,UUN8YzLWc0vSyM6GP3Fx9RD,Iu,E,d6lUu5bPKZUtV8UBYbPYT2cW L iLs NEY0jm6m5l20E,oePlltOkCi FCbut

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Club Baloncesto Breogán Índice Historia | Pavillón | Nome | O Breogán na cultura popular | Xogadores | Adestradores | Presidentes | Palmarés | Historial | Líderes | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióncbbreogan.galCadroGuía oficial da ACB 2009-10, páxina 201Guía oficial ACB 1992, páxina 183. Editorial DB.É de 6.500 espectadores sentados axeitándose á última normativa"Estudiantes Junior, entre as mellores canteiras"o orixinalHemeroteca El Mundo Deportivo, 16 setembro de 1970, páxina 12Historia do BreogánAlfredo Pérez, o último canoneiroHistoria C.B. BreogánHemeroteca de El Mundo DeportivoJimmy Wright, norteamericano do Breogán deixará Lugo por ameazas de morteResultados de Breogán en 1986-87Resultados de Breogán en 1990-91Ficha de Velimir Perasović en acb.comResultados de Breogán en 1994-95Breogán arrasa al Barça. "El Mundo Deportivo", 27 de setembro de 1999, páxina 58CB Breogán - FC BarcelonaA FEB invita a participar nunha nova Liga EuropeaCharlie Bell na prensa estatalMáximos anotadores 2005Tempada 2005-06 : Tódolos Xogadores da Xornada""Non quero pensar nunha man negra, mais pregúntome que está a pasar""o orixinalRaúl López, orgulloso dos xogadores, presume da boa saúde económica do BreogánJulio González confirma que cesa como presidente del BreogánHomenaxe a Lisardo GómezA tempada do rexurdimento celesteEntrevista a Lisardo GómezEl COB dinamita el Pazo para forzar el quinto (69-73)Cafés Candelas, patrocinador del CB Breogán"Suso Lázare, novo presidente do Breogán"o orixinalCafés Candelas Breogán firma el mayor triunfo de la historiaEl Breogán realizará 17 homenajes por su cincuenta aniversario"O Breogán honra ao seu fundador e primeiro presidente"o orixinalMiguel Giao recibiu a homenaxe do PazoHomenaxe aos primeiros gladiadores celestesO home que nos amosa como ver o Breo co corazónTita Franco será homenaxeada polos #50anosdeBreoJulio Vila recibirá unha homenaxe in memoriam polos #50anosdeBreo"O Breogán homenaxeará aos seus aboados máis veteráns"Pechada ovación a «Capi» Sanmartín e Ricardo «Corazón de González»Homenaxe por décadas de informaciónPaco García volve ao Pazo con motivo do 50 aniversario"Resultados y clasificaciones""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, campión da Copa Princesa""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, equipo ACB"C.B. Breogán"Proxecto social"o orixinal"Centros asociados"o orixinalFicha en imdb.comMario Camus trata la recuperación del amor en 'La vieja música', su última película"Páxina web oficial""Club Baloncesto Breogán""C. B. Breogán S.A.D."eehttp://www.fegaba.com

                    Vilaño, A Laracha Índice Patrimonio | Lugares e parroquias | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación43°14′52″N 8°36′03″O / 43.24775, -8.60070

                    Cegueira Índice Epidemioloxía | Deficiencia visual | Tipos de cegueira | Principais causas de cegueira | Tratamento | Técnicas de adaptación e axudas | Vida dos cegos | Primeiros auxilios | Crenzas respecto das persoas cegas | Crenzas das persoas cegas | O neno deficiente visual | Aspectos psicolóxicos da cegueira | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación54.054.154.436928256blindnessDicionario da Real Academia GalegaPortal das Palabras"International Standards: Visual Standards — Aspects and Ranges of Vision Loss with Emphasis on Population Surveys.""Visual impairment and blindness""Presentan un plan para previr a cegueira"o orixinalACCDV Associació Catalana de Cecs i Disminuïts Visuals - PMFTrachoma"Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis"1844137110.1056/NEJMoa0802268Cans guía - os mellores amigos dos cegosArquivadoEscola de cans guía para cegos en Mortágua, PortugalArquivado"Tecnología para ciegos y deficientes visuales. Recopilación de recursos gratuitos en la Red""Colorino""‘COL.diesis’, escuchar los sonidos del color""COL.diesis: Transforming Colour into Melody and Implementing the Result in a Colour Sensor Device"o orixinal"Sistema de desarrollo de sinestesia color-sonido para invidentes utilizando un protocolo de audio""Enseñanza táctil - geometría y color. Juegos didácticos para niños ciegos y videntes""Sistema Constanz"L'ocupació laboral dels cecs a l'Estat espanyol està pràcticament equiparada a la de les persones amb visió, entrevista amb Pedro ZuritaONCE (Organización Nacional de Cegos de España)Prevención da cegueiraDescrición de deficiencias visuais (Disc@pnet)Braillín, un boneco atractivo para calquera neno, con ou sen discapacidade, que permite familiarizarse co sistema de escritura e lectura brailleAxudas Técnicas36838ID00897494007150-90057129528256DOID:1432HP:0000618D001766C10.597.751.941.162C97109C0155020