Setting up multiple wireless access points on same network The Next CEO of Stack OverflowWireless Access Points with APIQuestions about overlapping wifi access pointsUpgrading from small business Wi-Fi network access points with individual SSIDsIs browser based wireless authentication secure?Multiple access points in a switchHow to mask out wireless by blocking a neighboring WiFi Access PointExtend wireless LAN with several access points?Seamless wireless AP network through wired routersBest way to connect dual SSID / VLAN wireless to Watchguard firewallmultiple access points sharing a single SSID
Read/write a pipe-delimited file line by line with some simple text manipulation
Why does freezing point matter when picking cooler ice packs?
That's an odd coin - I wonder why
Is it possible to make a 9x9 table fit within the default margins?
Compensation for working overtime on Saturdays
What does this strange code stamp on my passport mean?
How should I connect my cat5 cable to connectors having an orange-green line?
Is the offspring between a demon and a celestial possible? If so what is it called and is it in a book somewhere?
Would a grinding machine be a simple and workable propulsion system for an interplanetary spacecraft?
Can a PhD from a non-TU9 German university become a professor in a TU9 university?
Can this transistor (2n2222) take 6V on emitter-base? Am I reading datasheet incorrectly?
How can I replace x-axis labels with pre-determined symbols?
Why was Sir Cadogan fired?
Mathematica command that allows it to read my intentions
Incomplete cube
Salesforce opportunity stages
How to compactly explain secondary and tertiary characters without resorting to stereotypes?
Is this a new Fibonacci Identity?
Is it OK to decorate a log book cover?
Find the majority element, which appears more than half the time
Ising model simulation
Why doesn't Shulchan Aruch include the laws of destroying fruit trees?
Raspberry pi 3 B with Ubuntu 18.04 server arm64: what pi version
Avoiding the "not like other girls" trope?
Setting up multiple wireless access points on same network
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowWireless Access Points with APIQuestions about overlapping wifi access pointsUpgrading from small business Wi-Fi network access points with individual SSIDsIs browser based wireless authentication secure?Multiple access points in a switchHow to mask out wireless by blocking a neighboring WiFi Access PointExtend wireless LAN with several access points?Seamless wireless AP network through wired routersBest way to connect dual SSID / VLAN wireless to Watchguard firewallmultiple access points sharing a single SSID
I'd like to add wireless to my network, and I need multiple access points to cover the whole area. I'd like to set them up so that there's only one "wireless network" that the clients see, and it switches them as seamlessly as possible between access points as they wander around (if that's not possible, then at least have it so that they don't need to set up the security by hand on each one the first time, if possible).
I've searched online, and there are quite a few sets of mixed instructions (same vs different SSID, frequency, does the security need to match exactly, etc.). Can somebody who has some experience doing this please let me know what they did? I imagine it's pretty simple, but there seems to be no clear cut "yes, you can do this" online, even though I know you can.
I have a mid-size LAN with about 20 workstations and two Domain Controllers on it. Also, I'll be doing this with consumer wireless components, if it makes a difference, not enterprise-level components (ie. Linksys rather than Cisco).
wifi frequency
migrated from stackoverflow.com Sep 9 '09 at 21:21
This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.
add a comment |
I'd like to add wireless to my network, and I need multiple access points to cover the whole area. I'd like to set them up so that there's only one "wireless network" that the clients see, and it switches them as seamlessly as possible between access points as they wander around (if that's not possible, then at least have it so that they don't need to set up the security by hand on each one the first time, if possible).
I've searched online, and there are quite a few sets of mixed instructions (same vs different SSID, frequency, does the security need to match exactly, etc.). Can somebody who has some experience doing this please let me know what they did? I imagine it's pretty simple, but there seems to be no clear cut "yes, you can do this" online, even though I know you can.
I have a mid-size LAN with about 20 workstations and two Domain Controllers on it. Also, I'll be doing this with consumer wireless components, if it makes a difference, not enterprise-level components (ie. Linksys rather than Cisco).
wifi frequency
migrated from stackoverflow.com Sep 9 '09 at 21:21
This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.
add a comment |
I'd like to add wireless to my network, and I need multiple access points to cover the whole area. I'd like to set them up so that there's only one "wireless network" that the clients see, and it switches them as seamlessly as possible between access points as they wander around (if that's not possible, then at least have it so that they don't need to set up the security by hand on each one the first time, if possible).
I've searched online, and there are quite a few sets of mixed instructions (same vs different SSID, frequency, does the security need to match exactly, etc.). Can somebody who has some experience doing this please let me know what they did? I imagine it's pretty simple, but there seems to be no clear cut "yes, you can do this" online, even though I know you can.
I have a mid-size LAN with about 20 workstations and two Domain Controllers on it. Also, I'll be doing this with consumer wireless components, if it makes a difference, not enterprise-level components (ie. Linksys rather than Cisco).
wifi frequency
I'd like to add wireless to my network, and I need multiple access points to cover the whole area. I'd like to set them up so that there's only one "wireless network" that the clients see, and it switches them as seamlessly as possible between access points as they wander around (if that's not possible, then at least have it so that they don't need to set up the security by hand on each one the first time, if possible).
I've searched online, and there are quite a few sets of mixed instructions (same vs different SSID, frequency, does the security need to match exactly, etc.). Can somebody who has some experience doing this please let me know what they did? I imagine it's pretty simple, but there seems to be no clear cut "yes, you can do this" online, even though I know you can.
I have a mid-size LAN with about 20 workstations and two Domain Controllers on it. Also, I'll be doing this with consumer wireless components, if it makes a difference, not enterprise-level components (ie. Linksys rather than Cisco).
wifi frequency
wifi frequency
asked Sep 28 '08 at 22:28
SqlRyanSqlRyan
54641122
54641122
migrated from stackoverflow.com Sep 9 '09 at 21:21
This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.
migrated from stackoverflow.com Sep 9 '09 at 21:21
This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
The last time I did this, I setup the same SSID and WPA keys on two access points and set them to different channels. I've been told that due to overlapping frequencies, the channels 1, 6, and 11 are the best ones to use. I set mine up on 1 and 6. So far everything seems to be working well. My Windows-based clients connect to either one seamlessly, and the software will normally choose the one with the strongest signal automatically.
The only hitch is if a client connects to one access point, and then moves to a place where the other access point is stronger the client won't automatically switch to the new access point. To accomplish that the client needs to disconnect and reconnect. Of course, if the signal becomes too weak, that will happen automatically when the weaker signal is lost.
1
If you use WEP, switching between the two becomes seamless. The security is laughable, but I find that the increased stability is worth it.
– Daniel Spiewak
Sep 29 '08 at 0:10
What's the best practice for 4+ WAPs? Sprinkle the channels around?
– Earls
Feb 3 '13 at 2:14
add a comment |
You should check out the Ruckus mesh WLAN products, they provide a true mesh WLAN for SMB without the enterprise cost.
add a comment |
I set up a network with 4 outdoor access points . What I did was first set up Static IP addresses for the access points. Then set up the SSID and security key the same on all the access points. Then set up the channel separation. Now when used access the network, initially they will need to enter the security key for each each access point but after that they can roam seamlessly and get Wi-Fi wherever they go within the areas covered by the network.
New contributor
1
You do realise that your answer fits the 11 year old question less well than the answers it received at the time, right?
– Rob Moir
yesterday
add a comment |
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "2"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f63910%2fsetting-up-multiple-wireless-access-points-on-same-network%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The last time I did this, I setup the same SSID and WPA keys on two access points and set them to different channels. I've been told that due to overlapping frequencies, the channels 1, 6, and 11 are the best ones to use. I set mine up on 1 and 6. So far everything seems to be working well. My Windows-based clients connect to either one seamlessly, and the software will normally choose the one with the strongest signal automatically.
The only hitch is if a client connects to one access point, and then moves to a place where the other access point is stronger the client won't automatically switch to the new access point. To accomplish that the client needs to disconnect and reconnect. Of course, if the signal becomes too weak, that will happen automatically when the weaker signal is lost.
1
If you use WEP, switching between the two becomes seamless. The security is laughable, but I find that the increased stability is worth it.
– Daniel Spiewak
Sep 29 '08 at 0:10
What's the best practice for 4+ WAPs? Sprinkle the channels around?
– Earls
Feb 3 '13 at 2:14
add a comment |
The last time I did this, I setup the same SSID and WPA keys on two access points and set them to different channels. I've been told that due to overlapping frequencies, the channels 1, 6, and 11 are the best ones to use. I set mine up on 1 and 6. So far everything seems to be working well. My Windows-based clients connect to either one seamlessly, and the software will normally choose the one with the strongest signal automatically.
The only hitch is if a client connects to one access point, and then moves to a place where the other access point is stronger the client won't automatically switch to the new access point. To accomplish that the client needs to disconnect and reconnect. Of course, if the signal becomes too weak, that will happen automatically when the weaker signal is lost.
1
If you use WEP, switching between the two becomes seamless. The security is laughable, but I find that the increased stability is worth it.
– Daniel Spiewak
Sep 29 '08 at 0:10
What's the best practice for 4+ WAPs? Sprinkle the channels around?
– Earls
Feb 3 '13 at 2:14
add a comment |
The last time I did this, I setup the same SSID and WPA keys on two access points and set them to different channels. I've been told that due to overlapping frequencies, the channels 1, 6, and 11 are the best ones to use. I set mine up on 1 and 6. So far everything seems to be working well. My Windows-based clients connect to either one seamlessly, and the software will normally choose the one with the strongest signal automatically.
The only hitch is if a client connects to one access point, and then moves to a place where the other access point is stronger the client won't automatically switch to the new access point. To accomplish that the client needs to disconnect and reconnect. Of course, if the signal becomes too weak, that will happen automatically when the weaker signal is lost.
The last time I did this, I setup the same SSID and WPA keys on two access points and set them to different channels. I've been told that due to overlapping frequencies, the channels 1, 6, and 11 are the best ones to use. I set mine up on 1 and 6. So far everything seems to be working well. My Windows-based clients connect to either one seamlessly, and the software will normally choose the one with the strongest signal automatically.
The only hitch is if a client connects to one access point, and then moves to a place where the other access point is stronger the client won't automatically switch to the new access point. To accomplish that the client needs to disconnect and reconnect. Of course, if the signal becomes too weak, that will happen automatically when the weaker signal is lost.
answered Sep 28 '08 at 22:39
jbourque
1
If you use WEP, switching between the two becomes seamless. The security is laughable, but I find that the increased stability is worth it.
– Daniel Spiewak
Sep 29 '08 at 0:10
What's the best practice for 4+ WAPs? Sprinkle the channels around?
– Earls
Feb 3 '13 at 2:14
add a comment |
1
If you use WEP, switching between the two becomes seamless. The security is laughable, but I find that the increased stability is worth it.
– Daniel Spiewak
Sep 29 '08 at 0:10
What's the best practice for 4+ WAPs? Sprinkle the channels around?
– Earls
Feb 3 '13 at 2:14
1
1
If you use WEP, switching between the two becomes seamless. The security is laughable, but I find that the increased stability is worth it.
– Daniel Spiewak
Sep 29 '08 at 0:10
If you use WEP, switching between the two becomes seamless. The security is laughable, but I find that the increased stability is worth it.
– Daniel Spiewak
Sep 29 '08 at 0:10
What's the best practice for 4+ WAPs? Sprinkle the channels around?
– Earls
Feb 3 '13 at 2:14
What's the best practice for 4+ WAPs? Sprinkle the channels around?
– Earls
Feb 3 '13 at 2:14
add a comment |
You should check out the Ruckus mesh WLAN products, they provide a true mesh WLAN for SMB without the enterprise cost.
add a comment |
You should check out the Ruckus mesh WLAN products, they provide a true mesh WLAN for SMB without the enterprise cost.
add a comment |
You should check out the Ruckus mesh WLAN products, they provide a true mesh WLAN for SMB without the enterprise cost.
You should check out the Ruckus mesh WLAN products, they provide a true mesh WLAN for SMB without the enterprise cost.
answered Sep 28 '08 at 23:08
Darrel MillerDarrel Miller
1711311
1711311
add a comment |
add a comment |
I set up a network with 4 outdoor access points . What I did was first set up Static IP addresses for the access points. Then set up the SSID and security key the same on all the access points. Then set up the channel separation. Now when used access the network, initially they will need to enter the security key for each each access point but after that they can roam seamlessly and get Wi-Fi wherever they go within the areas covered by the network.
New contributor
1
You do realise that your answer fits the 11 year old question less well than the answers it received at the time, right?
– Rob Moir
yesterday
add a comment |
I set up a network with 4 outdoor access points . What I did was first set up Static IP addresses for the access points. Then set up the SSID and security key the same on all the access points. Then set up the channel separation. Now when used access the network, initially they will need to enter the security key for each each access point but after that they can roam seamlessly and get Wi-Fi wherever they go within the areas covered by the network.
New contributor
1
You do realise that your answer fits the 11 year old question less well than the answers it received at the time, right?
– Rob Moir
yesterday
add a comment |
I set up a network with 4 outdoor access points . What I did was first set up Static IP addresses for the access points. Then set up the SSID and security key the same on all the access points. Then set up the channel separation. Now when used access the network, initially they will need to enter the security key for each each access point but after that they can roam seamlessly and get Wi-Fi wherever they go within the areas covered by the network.
New contributor
I set up a network with 4 outdoor access points . What I did was first set up Static IP addresses for the access points. Then set up the SSID and security key the same on all the access points. Then set up the channel separation. Now when used access the network, initially they will need to enter the security key for each each access point but after that they can roam seamlessly and get Wi-Fi wherever they go within the areas covered by the network.
New contributor
New contributor
answered yesterday
Denni6 MillerDenni6 Miller
1
1
New contributor
New contributor
1
You do realise that your answer fits the 11 year old question less well than the answers it received at the time, right?
– Rob Moir
yesterday
add a comment |
1
You do realise that your answer fits the 11 year old question less well than the answers it received at the time, right?
– Rob Moir
yesterday
1
1
You do realise that your answer fits the 11 year old question less well than the answers it received at the time, right?
– Rob Moir
yesterday
You do realise that your answer fits the 11 year old question less well than the answers it received at the time, right?
– Rob Moir
yesterday
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f63910%2fsetting-up-multiple-wireless-access-points-on-same-network%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown