Routing between different LAN subnets with different LAN GWRouting between subnets with one router?Selective Routing Between SubnetsRouting SIP between subnetsMulticast in private LAN with different subnetspfSense routing between subnets behind OPT1 and LANpfSense OpenVPN Routing to Sever LANRouting between pfSense Subnets and IPSec VPNOpenVPN routing between different subnetsRouting traffic between two subnetsPfsense routing between OPT subnet and LAN subnet
Possibly bubble sort algorithm
What do you call a Matrix-like slowdown and camera movement effect?
Is there really no realistic way for a skeleton monster to move around without magic?
Why are 150k or 200k jobs considered good when there are 300k+ births a month?
Modification to Chariots for Heavy Cavalry Analogue for 4-armed race
What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?
Can I make popcorn with any corn?
What defenses are there against being summoned by the Gate spell?
How did the USSR manage to innovate in an environment characterized by government censorship and high bureaucracy?
How is the claim "I am in New York only if I am in America" the same as "If I am in New York, then I am in America?
Why doesn't Newton's third law mean a person bounces back to where they started when they hit the ground?
Why Is Death Allowed In the Matrix?
Why don't electromagnetic waves interact with each other?
How do we improve the relationship with a client software team that performs poorly and is becoming less collaborative?
Copenhagen passport control - US citizen
Why CLRS example on residual networks does not follows its formula?
What would happen to a modern skyscraper if it rains micro blackholes?
How to add power-LED to my small amplifier?
Why are only specific transaction types accepted into the mempool?
What typically incentivizes a professor to change jobs to a lower ranking university?
Is it possible to make sharp wind that can cut stuff from afar?
How to re-create Edward Weson's Pepper No. 30?
New order #4: World
Do airline pilots ever risk not hearing communication directed to them specifically, from traffic controllers?
Routing between different LAN subnets with different LAN GW
Routing between subnets with one router?Selective Routing Between SubnetsRouting SIP between subnetsMulticast in private LAN with different subnetspfSense routing between subnets behind OPT1 and LANpfSense OpenVPN Routing to Sever LANRouting between pfSense Subnets and IPSec VPNOpenVPN routing between different subnetsRouting traffic between two subnetsPfsense routing between OPT subnet and LAN subnet
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
I have a little stupid question, but i'm really stucked.
We have two pfsense in different location.
In first location we have LAN net 10.200.1.0/24 with gateway 10.200.1.1.
In second location we have LAN net 10.200.40.0/24 with gateway 10.200.40.3.
All time we used OpenVPN static connect and all worked fine, but recently we got dedicated canal between two location.
I'm try to setting routing, like this:
Static route to 10.200.40.0/24 through GW 10.200.1.1.
Static route to 10.200.1.0/24 through GW 10.200.40.3.
Okay, it work, but... not good.
We have a traceroute like this:
From 10.200.1.13 => 10.200.1.1 => 10.200.40.51- looks good, but the network was unstable - especially with TCP-connections.
And iperf(for speed test) show like this:
[ ID] Interval > Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 256 KBytes 2.09 > Mbits/sec
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec
[ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec
[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec
etc.
After i add on local computer 10.200.1.30 route like:
route add 10.200.40.0 255.255.255.0 10.200.40.3
Everything began to work perfectly, iperf show this(with the same settings):
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 66.5 MBytes 558 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 68.5 MBytes 574 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 68.0 MBytes 571 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 69.6 MBytes 584 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 46.0 MBytes 386 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 5.00-5.24 sec 16.2 MBytes 562 Mbits/sec
And now i'm stucked - how i can push all traffic from 1.0 for 40.0 subnet through remote GW, not for each machine? And vice versa - from 40.0 to 1.0:)
I can't add GW to interface LAN - i get "The gateway address 10.200.40.3 does not lie within one of the chosen interface's subnets.".
Please, help!
Thank you in advance!
UPD:
Oh, sorry, it's very simple scheme - i'm just took this infrastructure without any docs. If you need get more info - please, tell me. Thanks!
scheme
routing pfsense gateway
asked Apr 4 at 12:44
Theo ViTheo Vi
11
New contributor
Theo Vi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I have a little stupid question, but i'm really stucked.
We have two pfsense in different location.
In first location we have LAN net 10.200.1.0/24 with gateway 10.200.1.1.
In second location we have LAN net 10.200.40.0/24 with gateway 10.200.40.3.
All time we used OpenVPN static connect and all worked fine, but recently we got dedicated canal between two location.
I'm try to setting routing, like this:
Static route to 10.200.40.0/24 through GW 10.200.1.1.
Static route to 10.200.1.0/24 through GW 10.200.40.3.
Okay, it work, but... not good.
We have a traceroute like this:
From 10.200.1.13 => 10.200.1.1 => 10.200.40.51- looks good, but the network was unstable - especially with TCP-connections.
And iperf(for speed test) show like this:
[ ID] Interval > Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 256 KBytes 2.09 > Mbits/sec
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec
[ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec
[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec
etc.
After i add on local computer 10.200.1.30 route like:
route add 10.200.40.0 255.255.255.0 10.200.40.3
Everything began to work perfectly, iperf show this(with the same settings):
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 66.5 MBytes 558 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 68.5 MBytes 574 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 68.0 MBytes 571 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 69.6 MBytes 584 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 46.0 MBytes 386 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 5.00-5.24 sec 16.2 MBytes 562 Mbits/sec
And now i'm stucked - how i can push all traffic from 1.0 for 40.0 subnet through remote GW, not for each machine? And vice versa - from 40.0 to 1.0:)
I can't add GW to interface LAN - i get "The gateway address 10.200.40.3 does not lie within one of the chosen interface's subnets.".
Please, help!
Thank you in advance!
UPD:
Oh, sorry, it's very simple scheme - i'm just took this infrastructure without any docs. If you need get more info - please, tell me. Thanks!
scheme
routing pfsense gateway
asked Apr 4 at 12:44
Theo ViTheo Vi
11
New contributor
Theo Vi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
It would be helpful if you can edit your question to provide a simple diagram. It's unclear how the two networks are connected. You may need to add a router to route between networks, but without a diagram, we can't say for sure.
– Ron Trunk
Apr 4 at 12:55
Do you happen to have an in-between network for the direct channel? so one side can communicate with the other?
– fboaventura
2 days ago
add a comment |
I have a little stupid question, but i'm really stucked.
We have two pfsense in different location.
In first location we have LAN net 10.200.1.0/24 with gateway 10.200.1.1.
In second location we have LAN net 10.200.40.0/24 with gateway 10.200.40.3.
All time we used OpenVPN static connect and all worked fine, but recently we got dedicated canal between two location.
I'm try to setting routing, like this:
Static route to 10.200.40.0/24 through GW 10.200.1.1.
Static route to 10.200.1.0/24 through GW 10.200.40.3.
Okay, it work, but... not good.
We have a traceroute like this:
From 10.200.1.13 => 10.200.1.1 => 10.200.40.51- looks good, but the network was unstable - especially with TCP-connections.
And iperf(for speed test) show like this:
[ ID] Interval > Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 256 KBytes 2.09 > Mbits/sec
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec
[ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec
[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec
etc.
After i add on local computer 10.200.1.30 route like:
route add 10.200.40.0 255.255.255.0 10.200.40.3
Everything began to work perfectly, iperf show this(with the same settings):
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 66.5 MBytes 558 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 68.5 MBytes 574 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 68.0 MBytes 571 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 69.6 MBytes 584 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 46.0 MBytes 386 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 5.00-5.24 sec 16.2 MBytes 562 Mbits/sec
And now i'm stucked - how i can push all traffic from 1.0 for 40.0 subnet through remote GW, not for each machine? And vice versa - from 40.0 to 1.0:)
I can't add GW to interface LAN - i get "The gateway address 10.200.40.3 does not lie within one of the chosen interface's subnets.".
Please, help!
Thank you in advance!
UPD:
Oh, sorry, it's very simple scheme - i'm just took this infrastructure without any docs. If you need get more info - please, tell me. Thanks!
scheme
routing pfsense gateway
asked Apr 4 at 12:44
Theo ViTheo Vi
11
New contributor
Theo Vi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I have a little stupid question, but i'm really stucked.
We have two pfsense in different location.
In first location we have LAN net 10.200.1.0/24 with gateway 10.200.1.1.
In second location we have LAN net 10.200.40.0/24 with gateway 10.200.40.3.
All time we used OpenVPN static connect and all worked fine, but recently we got dedicated canal between two location.
I'm try to setting routing, like this:
Static route to 10.200.40.0/24 through GW 10.200.1.1.
Static route to 10.200.1.0/24 through GW 10.200.40.3.
Okay, it work, but... not good.
We have a traceroute like this:
From 10.200.1.13 => 10.200.1.1 => 10.200.40.51- looks good, but the network was unstable - especially with TCP-connections.
And iperf(for speed test) show like this:
[ ID] Interval > Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 256 KBytes 2.09 > Mbits/sec
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec
[ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec
[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec
etc.
After i add on local computer 10.200.1.30 route like:
route add 10.200.40.0 255.255.255.0 10.200.40.3
Everything began to work perfectly, iperf show this(with the same settings):
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 66.5 MBytes 558 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 68.5 MBytes 574 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 2.00-3.00 sec 68.0 MBytes 571 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 3.00-4.00 sec 69.6 MBytes 584 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 4.00-5.00 sec 46.0 MBytes 386 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 5.00-5.24 sec 16.2 MBytes 562 Mbits/sec
And now i'm stucked - how i can push all traffic from 1.0 for 40.0 subnet through remote GW, not for each machine? And vice versa - from 40.0 to 1.0:)
I can't add GW to interface LAN - i get "The gateway address 10.200.40.3 does not lie within one of the chosen interface's subnets.".
Please, help!
Thank you in advance!
UPD:
Oh, sorry, it's very simple scheme - i'm just took this infrastructure without any docs. If you need get more info - please, tell me. Thanks!
scheme
routing pfsense gateway
routing pfsense gateway
asked Apr 4 at 12:44
Theo ViTheo Vi
11
New contributor
Theo Vi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Apr 4 at 12:44
Theo ViTheo Vi
11
New contributor
Theo Vi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited Apr 4 at 13:09
Theo Vi
asked Apr 4 at 12:44
Theo ViTheo Vi
11
New contributor
Theo Vi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Apr 4 at 12:44
Theo ViTheo Vi
11
asked Apr 4 at 12:44
Theo ViTheo Vi
11
11
New contributor
Theo Vi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Theo Vi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Theo Vi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
It would be helpful if you can edit your question to provide a simple diagram. It's unclear how the two networks are connected. You may need to add a router to route between networks, but without a diagram, we can't say for sure.
– Ron Trunk
Apr 4 at 12:55
Do you happen to have an in-between network for the direct channel? so one side can communicate with the other?
– fboaventura
2 days ago
add a comment |
It would be helpful if you can edit your question to provide a simple diagram. It's unclear how the two networks are connected. You may need to add a router to route between networks, but without a diagram, we can't say for sure.
– Ron Trunk
Apr 4 at 12:55
Do you happen to have an in-between network for the direct channel? so one side can communicate with the other?
– fboaventura
2 days ago
It would be helpful if you can edit your question to provide a simple diagram. It's unclear how the two networks are connected. You may need to add a router to route between networks, but without a diagram, we can't say for sure.
– Ron Trunk
Apr 4 at 12:55
It would be helpful if you can edit your question to provide a simple diagram. It's unclear how the two networks are connected. You may need to add a router to route between networks, but without a diagram, we can't say for sure.
– Ron Trunk
Apr 4 at 12:55
Do you happen to have an in-between network for the direct channel? so one side can communicate with the other?
– fboaventura
2 days ago
Do you happen to have an in-between network for the direct channel? so one side can communicate with the other?
– fboaventura
2 days ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Short answer: you need a router to route between subnets. If your 3750G has the right software version, you can configure it as the router. Otherwise, you will need additional equipment.
You will also need to configure a routing protocol (OSPF) between the 3750 and your pfsense devices, so that they know about each other.
answered Apr 4 at 13:30
Ron TrunkRon Trunk
307111
Thanks for your answer. Ron! But I am confused by the fact that in the current mode the network is working, the hosts see each other. Problem ONLY with TCP, UDP works fine. And if I prescribe a route for the second subnet manually on my PC, then the all networks works perfectly, as I said. Simply, if there is no way in the current configuration to register routes on pfSense's - it will be easier for me to distribute routes to the subnet 10.200.40.0/24 via GPO through 10.200.60.3, isn't it? Instead of reconfiguring the whole network, one of the locations of which is remote.
– Theo Vi
Apr 4 at 13:37
If it works for you, then that's fine. But you asked how to do it without configuring each machine.
– Ron Trunk
Apr 4 at 13:47
Okay, i got it. Just for finally clarify - i can't add gateway 10.200.40.3 to pfSense and then make route to 10.200.40.0 subnet in any way? Bad, if so. Anyway, thank you for help. P.S. Maybe I will think about reconfiguring the network:)
– Theo Vi
Apr 4 at 14:17
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "2"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Theo Vi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f961497%2frouting-between-different-lan-subnets-with-different-lan-gw%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Short answer: you need a router to route between subnets. If your 3750G has the right software version, you can configure it as the router. Otherwise, you will need additional equipment.
You will also need to configure a routing protocol (OSPF) between the 3750 and your pfsense devices, so that they know about each other.
answered Apr 4 at 13:30
Ron TrunkRon Trunk
307111
Thanks for your answer. Ron! But I am confused by the fact that in the current mode the network is working, the hosts see each other. Problem ONLY with TCP, UDP works fine. And if I prescribe a route for the second subnet manually on my PC, then the all networks works perfectly, as I said. Simply, if there is no way in the current configuration to register routes on pfSense's - it will be easier for me to distribute routes to the subnet 10.200.40.0/24 via GPO through 10.200.60.3, isn't it? Instead of reconfiguring the whole network, one of the locations of which is remote.
– Theo Vi
Apr 4 at 13:37
If it works for you, then that's fine. But you asked how to do it without configuring each machine.
– Ron Trunk
Apr 4 at 13:47
Okay, i got it. Just for finally clarify - i can't add gateway 10.200.40.3 to pfSense and then make route to 10.200.40.0 subnet in any way? Bad, if so. Anyway, thank you for help. P.S. Maybe I will think about reconfiguring the network:)
– Theo Vi
Apr 4 at 14:17
add a comment |
Short answer: you need a router to route between subnets. If your 3750G has the right software version, you can configure it as the router. Otherwise, you will need additional equipment.
You will also need to configure a routing protocol (OSPF) between the 3750 and your pfsense devices, so that they know about each other.
answered Apr 4 at 13:30
Ron TrunkRon Trunk
307111
Thanks for your answer. Ron! But I am confused by the fact that in the current mode the network is working, the hosts see each other. Problem ONLY with TCP, UDP works fine. And if I prescribe a route for the second subnet manually on my PC, then the all networks works perfectly, as I said. Simply, if there is no way in the current configuration to register routes on pfSense's - it will be easier for me to distribute routes to the subnet 10.200.40.0/24 via GPO through 10.200.60.3, isn't it? Instead of reconfiguring the whole network, one of the locations of which is remote.
– Theo Vi
Apr 4 at 13:37
If it works for you, then that's fine. But you asked how to do it without configuring each machine.
– Ron Trunk
Apr 4 at 13:47
Okay, i got it. Just for finally clarify - i can't add gateway 10.200.40.3 to pfSense and then make route to 10.200.40.0 subnet in any way? Bad, if so. Anyway, thank you for help. P.S. Maybe I will think about reconfiguring the network:)
– Theo Vi
Apr 4 at 14:17
add a comment |
Short answer: you need a router to route between subnets. If your 3750G has the right software version, you can configure it as the router. Otherwise, you will need additional equipment.
You will also need to configure a routing protocol (OSPF) between the 3750 and your pfsense devices, so that they know about each other.
answered Apr 4 at 13:30
Ron TrunkRon Trunk
307111
Short answer: you need a router to route between subnets. If your 3750G has the right software version, you can configure it as the router. Otherwise, you will need additional equipment.
You will also need to configure a routing protocol (OSPF) between the 3750 and your pfsense devices, so that they know about each other.
answered Apr 4 at 13:30
Ron TrunkRon Trunk
307111
answered Apr 4 at 13:30
Ron TrunkRon Trunk
307111
answered Apr 4 at 13:30
Ron TrunkRon Trunk
307111
answered Apr 4 at 13:30
Ron TrunkRon Trunk
307111
307111
Thanks for your answer. Ron! But I am confused by the fact that in the current mode the network is working, the hosts see each other. Problem ONLY with TCP, UDP works fine. And if I prescribe a route for the second subnet manually on my PC, then the all networks works perfectly, as I said. Simply, if there is no way in the current configuration to register routes on pfSense's - it will be easier for me to distribute routes to the subnet 10.200.40.0/24 via GPO through 10.200.60.3, isn't it? Instead of reconfiguring the whole network, one of the locations of which is remote.
– Theo Vi
Apr 4 at 13:37
If it works for you, then that's fine. But you asked how to do it without configuring each machine.
– Ron Trunk
Apr 4 at 13:47
Okay, i got it. Just for finally clarify - i can't add gateway 10.200.40.3 to pfSense and then make route to 10.200.40.0 subnet in any way? Bad, if so. Anyway, thank you for help. P.S. Maybe I will think about reconfiguring the network:)
– Theo Vi
Apr 4 at 14:17
add a comment |
Thanks for your answer. Ron! But I am confused by the fact that in the current mode the network is working, the hosts see each other. Problem ONLY with TCP, UDP works fine. And if I prescribe a route for the second subnet manually on my PC, then the all networks works perfectly, as I said. Simply, if there is no way in the current configuration to register routes on pfSense's - it will be easier for me to distribute routes to the subnet 10.200.40.0/24 via GPO through 10.200.60.3, isn't it? Instead of reconfiguring the whole network, one of the locations of which is remote.
– Theo Vi
Apr 4 at 13:37
If it works for you, then that's fine. But you asked how to do it without configuring each machine.
– Ron Trunk
Apr 4 at 13:47
Okay, i got it. Just for finally clarify - i can't add gateway 10.200.40.3 to pfSense and then make route to 10.200.40.0 subnet in any way? Bad, if so. Anyway, thank you for help. P.S. Maybe I will think about reconfiguring the network:)
– Theo Vi
Apr 4 at 14:17
Thanks for your answer. Ron! But I am confused by the fact that in the current mode the network is working, the hosts see each other. Problem ONLY with TCP, UDP works fine. And if I prescribe a route for the second subnet manually on my PC, then the all networks works perfectly, as I said. Simply, if there is no way in the current configuration to register routes on pfSense's - it will be easier for me to distribute routes to the subnet 10.200.40.0/24 via GPO through 10.200.60.3, isn't it? Instead of reconfiguring the whole network, one of the locations of which is remote.
– Theo Vi
Apr 4 at 13:37
Thanks for your answer. Ron! But I am confused by the fact that in the current mode the network is working, the hosts see each other. Problem ONLY with TCP, UDP works fine. And if I prescribe a route for the second subnet manually on my PC, then the all networks works perfectly, as I said. Simply, if there is no way in the current configuration to register routes on pfSense's - it will be easier for me to distribute routes to the subnet 10.200.40.0/24 via GPO through 10.200.60.3, isn't it? Instead of reconfiguring the whole network, one of the locations of which is remote.
– Theo Vi
Apr 4 at 13:37
If it works for you, then that's fine. But you asked how to do it without configuring each machine.
– Ron Trunk
Apr 4 at 13:47
If it works for you, then that's fine. But you asked how to do it without configuring each machine.
– Ron Trunk
Apr 4 at 13:47
Okay, i got it. Just for finally clarify - i can't add gateway 10.200.40.3 to pfSense and then make route to 10.200.40.0 subnet in any way? Bad, if so. Anyway, thank you for help. P.S. Maybe I will think about reconfiguring the network:)
– Theo Vi
Apr 4 at 14:17
Okay, i got it. Just for finally clarify - i can't add gateway 10.200.40.3 to pfSense and then make route to 10.200.40.0 subnet in any way? Bad, if so. Anyway, thank you for help. P.S. Maybe I will think about reconfiguring the network:)
– Theo Vi
Apr 4 at 14:17
add a comment |
Theo Vi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Theo Vi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Theo Vi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Theo Vi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f961497%2frouting-between-different-lan-subnets-with-different-lan-gw%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
It would be helpful if you can edit your question to provide a simple diagram. It's unclear how the two networks are connected. You may need to add a router to route between networks, but without a diagram, we can't say for sure.
– Ron Trunk
Apr 4 at 12:55
Do you happen to have an in-between network for the direct channel? so one side can communicate with the other?
– fboaventura
2 days ago