AD FS 3.0 does not redirect back to relying partyADFS Relying PartyAdding an RP to ADFS 2ADFS SAML Single LogoutWhy is ADFS not passing credentials through with Integrated Windows Authentiation?AD FS 3.0 Event ID 364 while creating MFA (and SSO)OWA error after the redirect from office365 login pageOAuth2 on ADFS with Multiple Claims Provider TrustsInstall Microsoft Dynamics CRM 2016 with IFD and ADFS on the same server using port 443ADFS - Correct way to massively provision relying party trusts for many similar SAML service providerADFS Signing error

Multi tool use
Multi tool use

How should I tell my manager I'm not paying for an optional after work event I'm not going to?

Would glacier 'trees' be plausible?

How can I support myself financially as a 17 year old with a loan?

Purpose of のは in this sentence?

Send iMessage from Firefox

Upside-Down Pyramid Addition...REVERSED!

What matters more when it comes to book covers? Is it ‘professional quality’ or relevancy?

What property of a BJT transistor makes it an amplifier?

Position of past participle and extent of the Verbklammer

Randomness of Python's random

Is latino sine flexione dead?

Why was the battle set up *outside* Winterfell?

Can a nothic's Weird Insight action discover secrets about a player character that the character doesn't know about themselves?

How was the quadratic formula created?

How does this change to the opportunity attack rule impact combat?

Why do money exchangers give different rates to different bills?

I have a unique character that I'm having a problem writing. He's a virus!

Getting a W on your transcript for grad school applications

What was the design of the Macintosh II's MMU replacement?

Manager is threatening to grade me poorly if I don't complete the project

Point of the the Dothraki's attack in GoT S8E3?

String won't reverse using reverse_copy

Make some Prime Squares!

Building a list of products from the elements in another list



AD FS 3.0 does not redirect back to relying party


ADFS Relying PartyAdding an RP to ADFS 2ADFS SAML Single LogoutWhy is ADFS not passing credentials through with Integrated Windows Authentiation?AD FS 3.0 Event ID 364 while creating MFA (and SSO)OWA error after the redirect from office365 login pageOAuth2 on ADFS with Multiple Claims Provider TrustsInstall Microsoft Dynamics CRM 2016 with IFD and ADFS on the same server using port 443ADFS - Correct way to massively provision relying party trusts for many similar SAML service providerADFS Signing error






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








0















So we have an installation of AD FS 3.0 (Windows Server 2012 R2 role) and a configured relying party. The relying party configuration in AD FS has the appropriate endpoint configured to service logout requests (see attached pics).



enter image description hereenter image description here



A client would browse to: https://adfs.dmz.local/adfs/ls/?wa=wsignout1.0&wreply=https%3a%2f%2fportal.dmz.local%3a44303%2fLogout&wtrealm=https%3a%2f%2fportal.dmz.local%3a44303%2f



Instead of being redirected back to the relying party (via the wreply parameter), they are instead just left on the AD FS logout page.



Any ideas why AD FS would not be honouring the redirect? Note: whether the "trusted Url" is the same as the one above or not, the redirect doesn't work.



Edit: so I had this misconfigured entirely. The "Example" is incredibly misleading. This needs to be an endpoint implementing logout for SAML. As a result, this question isn't valid.










share|improve this question






























    0















    So we have an installation of AD FS 3.0 (Windows Server 2012 R2 role) and a configured relying party. The relying party configuration in AD FS has the appropriate endpoint configured to service logout requests (see attached pics).



    enter image description hereenter image description here



    A client would browse to: https://adfs.dmz.local/adfs/ls/?wa=wsignout1.0&wreply=https%3a%2f%2fportal.dmz.local%3a44303%2fLogout&wtrealm=https%3a%2f%2fportal.dmz.local%3a44303%2f



    Instead of being redirected back to the relying party (via the wreply parameter), they are instead just left on the AD FS logout page.



    Any ideas why AD FS would not be honouring the redirect? Note: whether the "trusted Url" is the same as the one above or not, the redirect doesn't work.



    Edit: so I had this misconfigured entirely. The "Example" is incredibly misleading. This needs to be an endpoint implementing logout for SAML. As a result, this question isn't valid.










    share|improve this question


























      0












      0








      0








      So we have an installation of AD FS 3.0 (Windows Server 2012 R2 role) and a configured relying party. The relying party configuration in AD FS has the appropriate endpoint configured to service logout requests (see attached pics).



      enter image description hereenter image description here



      A client would browse to: https://adfs.dmz.local/adfs/ls/?wa=wsignout1.0&wreply=https%3a%2f%2fportal.dmz.local%3a44303%2fLogout&wtrealm=https%3a%2f%2fportal.dmz.local%3a44303%2f



      Instead of being redirected back to the relying party (via the wreply parameter), they are instead just left on the AD FS logout page.



      Any ideas why AD FS would not be honouring the redirect? Note: whether the "trusted Url" is the same as the one above or not, the redirect doesn't work.



      Edit: so I had this misconfigured entirely. The "Example" is incredibly misleading. This needs to be an endpoint implementing logout for SAML. As a result, this question isn't valid.










      share|improve this question
















      So we have an installation of AD FS 3.0 (Windows Server 2012 R2 role) and a configured relying party. The relying party configuration in AD FS has the appropriate endpoint configured to service logout requests (see attached pics).



      enter image description hereenter image description here



      A client would browse to: https://adfs.dmz.local/adfs/ls/?wa=wsignout1.0&wreply=https%3a%2f%2fportal.dmz.local%3a44303%2fLogout&wtrealm=https%3a%2f%2fportal.dmz.local%3a44303%2f



      Instead of being redirected back to the relying party (via the wreply parameter), they are instead just left on the AD FS logout page.



      Any ideas why AD FS would not be honouring the redirect? Note: whether the "trusted Url" is the same as the one above or not, the redirect doesn't work.



      Edit: so I had this misconfigured entirely. The "Example" is incredibly misleading. This needs to be an endpoint implementing logout for SAML. As a result, this question isn't valid.







      windows-server-2012-r2 adfs






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Oct 5 '14 at 10:35







      Rob Sanders

















      asked Oct 2 '14 at 4:15









      Rob SandersRob Sanders

      14129




      14129




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          You are mixing things up. You are adding WS-Federation parameters in a SAML Protocol configuration box. That is wrong.



          The wreply parameter is another story.






          share|improve this answer























          • OK, any advice on what SAML parameters should be set?

            – Rob Sanders
            Oct 3 '14 at 0:32











          • I do not yet understand the details of what you want. You will have to tell me first what protocol the Relying Party will use. Is it SAML2 or WS-Federation (passive)? For WS-Federation one URL should be enough and a Unique entity ID. For SAML it depends on what the SP/RP has configured. In general you should not do it manually. You should ask the RP/SP for its metadata and configure ADFS with the metadata. Manual configuration is an advanced topic, try not to go there.

            – paullem
            Oct 3 '14 at 14:26












          • paullem: so I had misunderstood the configuration. We're dealing with SAML 2.0 only, not WS-Fed. I was going down the wrong path but now I realise where I went wrong. This question isn't a valid one.

            – Rob Sanders
            Oct 5 '14 at 10:33











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "2"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f632950%2fad-fs-3-0-does-not-redirect-back-to-relying-party%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1














          You are mixing things up. You are adding WS-Federation parameters in a SAML Protocol configuration box. That is wrong.



          The wreply parameter is another story.






          share|improve this answer























          • OK, any advice on what SAML parameters should be set?

            – Rob Sanders
            Oct 3 '14 at 0:32











          • I do not yet understand the details of what you want. You will have to tell me first what protocol the Relying Party will use. Is it SAML2 or WS-Federation (passive)? For WS-Federation one URL should be enough and a Unique entity ID. For SAML it depends on what the SP/RP has configured. In general you should not do it manually. You should ask the RP/SP for its metadata and configure ADFS with the metadata. Manual configuration is an advanced topic, try not to go there.

            – paullem
            Oct 3 '14 at 14:26












          • paullem: so I had misunderstood the configuration. We're dealing with SAML 2.0 only, not WS-Fed. I was going down the wrong path but now I realise where I went wrong. This question isn't a valid one.

            – Rob Sanders
            Oct 5 '14 at 10:33















          1














          You are mixing things up. You are adding WS-Federation parameters in a SAML Protocol configuration box. That is wrong.



          The wreply parameter is another story.






          share|improve this answer























          • OK, any advice on what SAML parameters should be set?

            – Rob Sanders
            Oct 3 '14 at 0:32











          • I do not yet understand the details of what you want. You will have to tell me first what protocol the Relying Party will use. Is it SAML2 or WS-Federation (passive)? For WS-Federation one URL should be enough and a Unique entity ID. For SAML it depends on what the SP/RP has configured. In general you should not do it manually. You should ask the RP/SP for its metadata and configure ADFS with the metadata. Manual configuration is an advanced topic, try not to go there.

            – paullem
            Oct 3 '14 at 14:26












          • paullem: so I had misunderstood the configuration. We're dealing with SAML 2.0 only, not WS-Fed. I was going down the wrong path but now I realise where I went wrong. This question isn't a valid one.

            – Rob Sanders
            Oct 5 '14 at 10:33













          1












          1








          1







          You are mixing things up. You are adding WS-Federation parameters in a SAML Protocol configuration box. That is wrong.



          The wreply parameter is another story.






          share|improve this answer













          You are mixing things up. You are adding WS-Federation parameters in a SAML Protocol configuration box. That is wrong.



          The wreply parameter is another story.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Oct 2 '14 at 9:49









          paullempaullem

          32113




          32113












          • OK, any advice on what SAML parameters should be set?

            – Rob Sanders
            Oct 3 '14 at 0:32











          • I do not yet understand the details of what you want. You will have to tell me first what protocol the Relying Party will use. Is it SAML2 or WS-Federation (passive)? For WS-Federation one URL should be enough and a Unique entity ID. For SAML it depends on what the SP/RP has configured. In general you should not do it manually. You should ask the RP/SP for its metadata and configure ADFS with the metadata. Manual configuration is an advanced topic, try not to go there.

            – paullem
            Oct 3 '14 at 14:26












          • paullem: so I had misunderstood the configuration. We're dealing with SAML 2.0 only, not WS-Fed. I was going down the wrong path but now I realise where I went wrong. This question isn't a valid one.

            – Rob Sanders
            Oct 5 '14 at 10:33

















          • OK, any advice on what SAML parameters should be set?

            – Rob Sanders
            Oct 3 '14 at 0:32











          • I do not yet understand the details of what you want. You will have to tell me first what protocol the Relying Party will use. Is it SAML2 or WS-Federation (passive)? For WS-Federation one URL should be enough and a Unique entity ID. For SAML it depends on what the SP/RP has configured. In general you should not do it manually. You should ask the RP/SP for its metadata and configure ADFS with the metadata. Manual configuration is an advanced topic, try not to go there.

            – paullem
            Oct 3 '14 at 14:26












          • paullem: so I had misunderstood the configuration. We're dealing with SAML 2.0 only, not WS-Fed. I was going down the wrong path but now I realise where I went wrong. This question isn't a valid one.

            – Rob Sanders
            Oct 5 '14 at 10:33
















          OK, any advice on what SAML parameters should be set?

          – Rob Sanders
          Oct 3 '14 at 0:32





          OK, any advice on what SAML parameters should be set?

          – Rob Sanders
          Oct 3 '14 at 0:32













          I do not yet understand the details of what you want. You will have to tell me first what protocol the Relying Party will use. Is it SAML2 or WS-Federation (passive)? For WS-Federation one URL should be enough and a Unique entity ID. For SAML it depends on what the SP/RP has configured. In general you should not do it manually. You should ask the RP/SP for its metadata and configure ADFS with the metadata. Manual configuration is an advanced topic, try not to go there.

          – paullem
          Oct 3 '14 at 14:26






          I do not yet understand the details of what you want. You will have to tell me first what protocol the Relying Party will use. Is it SAML2 or WS-Federation (passive)? For WS-Federation one URL should be enough and a Unique entity ID. For SAML it depends on what the SP/RP has configured. In general you should not do it manually. You should ask the RP/SP for its metadata and configure ADFS with the metadata. Manual configuration is an advanced topic, try not to go there.

          – paullem
          Oct 3 '14 at 14:26














          paullem: so I had misunderstood the configuration. We're dealing with SAML 2.0 only, not WS-Fed. I was going down the wrong path but now I realise where I went wrong. This question isn't a valid one.

          – Rob Sanders
          Oct 5 '14 at 10:33





          paullem: so I had misunderstood the configuration. We're dealing with SAML 2.0 only, not WS-Fed. I was going down the wrong path but now I realise where I went wrong. This question isn't a valid one.

          – Rob Sanders
          Oct 5 '14 at 10:33

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f632950%2fad-fs-3-0-does-not-redirect-back-to-relying-party%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          p,z SUBW5LiyIgceZfsny9cYdO Z8HWFZFW
          ENPhy0R gHTslNFPeRn,o2YfluGe5iGA2ob,CAB4Avdi38Fea pjz9cfoC68,NH96 Hl7A4mt9g9,euiTj

          Popular posts from this blog

          RemoteApp sporadic failureWindows 2008 RemoteAPP client disconnects within a matter of minutesWhat is the minimum version of RDP supported by Server 2012 RDS?How to configure a Remoteapp server to increase stabilityMicrosoft RemoteApp Active SessionRDWeb TS connection broken for some users post RemoteApp certificate changeRemote Desktop Licensing, RemoteAPPRDS 2012 R2 some users are not able to logon after changed date and time on Connection BrokersWhat happens during Remote Desktop logon, and is there any logging?After installing RDS on WinServer 2016 I still can only connect with two users?RD Connection via RDGW to Session host is not connecting

          Vilaño, A Laracha Índice Patrimonio | Lugares e parroquias | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación43°14′52″N 8°36′03″O / 43.24775, -8.60070

          Cegueira Índice Epidemioloxía | Deficiencia visual | Tipos de cegueira | Principais causas de cegueira | Tratamento | Técnicas de adaptación e axudas | Vida dos cegos | Primeiros auxilios | Crenzas respecto das persoas cegas | Crenzas das persoas cegas | O neno deficiente visual | Aspectos psicolóxicos da cegueira | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación54.054.154.436928256blindnessDicionario da Real Academia GalegaPortal das Palabras"International Standards: Visual Standards — Aspects and Ranges of Vision Loss with Emphasis on Population Surveys.""Visual impairment and blindness""Presentan un plan para previr a cegueira"o orixinalACCDV Associació Catalana de Cecs i Disminuïts Visuals - PMFTrachoma"Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis"1844137110.1056/NEJMoa0802268Cans guía - os mellores amigos dos cegosArquivadoEscola de cans guía para cegos en Mortágua, PortugalArquivado"Tecnología para ciegos y deficientes visuales. Recopilación de recursos gratuitos en la Red""Colorino""‘COL.diesis’, escuchar los sonidos del color""COL.diesis: Transforming Colour into Melody and Implementing the Result in a Colour Sensor Device"o orixinal"Sistema de desarrollo de sinestesia color-sonido para invidentes utilizando un protocolo de audio""Enseñanza táctil - geometría y color. Juegos didácticos para niños ciegos y videntes""Sistema Constanz"L'ocupació laboral dels cecs a l'Estat espanyol està pràcticament equiparada a la de les persones amb visió, entrevista amb Pedro ZuritaONCE (Organización Nacional de Cegos de España)Prevención da cegueiraDescrición de deficiencias visuais (Disc@pnet)Braillín, un boneco atractivo para calquera neno, con ou sen discapacidade, que permite familiarizarse co sistema de escritura e lectura brailleAxudas Técnicas36838ID00897494007150-90057129528256DOID:1432HP:0000618D001766C10.597.751.941.162C97109C0155020