Why do people think Winterfell crypts is the safest place for women, children and old people?Which last name should the children of Robert and Cersei pass to their childrenWhy do Varys and Illyrio support both of these people?What's the big deal with the Tyrells controlling Westeros?How many statues are there in the Crypts of Winterfell? And in what order are they stored?Do Children of the Forest exist in Westeros in the time which is current for the series and the books?Why did Cersei ask for Ser Balman's help?Why did the Boltons burn Winterfell?Is Samwell Tarly a deserter of the Night's Watch?Do we ever find out who sent the catspaw after Bran in the show?Was Daenerys Targaryen based on Cleopatra?

Why wasn't the Night King naked in S08E03?

Pressure inside an infinite ocean?

Should I replace my bicycle tires if they have not been inflated in multiple years

How do I tell my manager that his code review comment is wrong?

Why was the battle set up *outside* Winterfell?

Point of the the Dothraki's attack in GoT S8E3?

What happens if you dump antimatter into a black hole?

In Avengers 1, why does Thanos need Loki?

Why do money exchangers give different rates to different bills?

Missing Piece of Pie - Can you find it?

What are the advantages of luxury car brands like Acura/Lexus over their sibling non-luxury brands Honda/Toyota?

How was the quadratic formula created?

Can there be a single technologically advanced nation, in a continent full of non-technologically advanced nations?

Can a nothic's Weird Insight action discover secrets about a player character that the character doesn't know about themselves?

Why is Arya visibly scared in the library in S8E3?

Why doesn't WotC use established keywords on all new cards?

As matter approaches a black hole, does it speed up?

What is the name of this hexagon/pentagon polyhedron?

Can you complete the sequence?

Using column size much larger than necessary

What is the difference between 'unconcealed' and 'revealed'?

I need a disease

Did we get closer to another plane than we were supposed to, or was the pilot just protecting our delicate sensibilities?

How to apply differences on part of a list and keep the rest



Why do people think Winterfell crypts is the safest place for women, children and old people?


Which last name should the children of Robert and Cersei pass to their childrenWhy do Varys and Illyrio support both of these people?What's the big deal with the Tyrells controlling Westeros?How many statues are there in the Crypts of Winterfell? And in what order are they stored?Do Children of the Forest exist in Westeros in the time which is current for the series and the books?Why did Cersei ask for Ser Balman's help?Why did the Boltons burn Winterfell?Is Samwell Tarly a deserter of the Night's Watch?Do we ever find out who sent the catspaw after Bran in the show?Was Daenerys Targaryen based on Cleopatra?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








22















In Game of Thrones S08E02 "A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms", it is repeatedly mentioned by multiple characters (I counted six) that when the Night King and the Army of the Dead attack, the Winterfell crypts are the safest place to be for women, children and old people.



But why is that? As far as I can see, it's got a single way down with lots of steps and poorly lit. If the dead win, the people there will be slaughtered with no way out. In any other place, they would have a chance to run at least.



Why would this be the safest place?










share|improve this question



















  • 22





    The crypts are huge, so you can protect a lot of people in one place. One way in means only one entrance to defend.

    – svenvo7
    Apr 22 at 17:36






  • 6





    Also there are no windows so they will not see the end coming from miles away.

    – mckenzm
    Apr 23 at 4:06






  • 3





    I'm pretty sure they're setting things up for the dead in the crypts to be raise by the Night King. Hence all the commentary about defending folks down there and so on as well as what you pointed out. A kind of Chekov's Zombie, if you will.

    – Paul
    Apr 23 at 21:41






  • 2





    @Paul I just read a theory that Bran refused to stay in the crypts because that will break the magic if any because of Night King mark.

    – KharoBangdo
    Apr 24 at 7:58






  • 1





    @Paul Ahhhh, oops. But surely the dead are sealed in stone boxes, or are ashes, or are so far gone they're just bundles of rags? Be cool to see Sean Bean come back as zombie Sean Bean, though. (Briefly.)

    – Grimm The Opiner
    Apr 24 at 15:39

















22















In Game of Thrones S08E02 "A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms", it is repeatedly mentioned by multiple characters (I counted six) that when the Night King and the Army of the Dead attack, the Winterfell crypts are the safest place to be for women, children and old people.



But why is that? As far as I can see, it's got a single way down with lots of steps and poorly lit. If the dead win, the people there will be slaughtered with no way out. In any other place, they would have a chance to run at least.



Why would this be the safest place?










share|improve this question



















  • 22





    The crypts are huge, so you can protect a lot of people in one place. One way in means only one entrance to defend.

    – svenvo7
    Apr 22 at 17:36






  • 6





    Also there are no windows so they will not see the end coming from miles away.

    – mckenzm
    Apr 23 at 4:06






  • 3





    I'm pretty sure they're setting things up for the dead in the crypts to be raise by the Night King. Hence all the commentary about defending folks down there and so on as well as what you pointed out. A kind of Chekov's Zombie, if you will.

    – Paul
    Apr 23 at 21:41






  • 2





    @Paul I just read a theory that Bran refused to stay in the crypts because that will break the magic if any because of Night King mark.

    – KharoBangdo
    Apr 24 at 7:58






  • 1





    @Paul Ahhhh, oops. But surely the dead are sealed in stone boxes, or are ashes, or are so far gone they're just bundles of rags? Be cool to see Sean Bean come back as zombie Sean Bean, though. (Briefly.)

    – Grimm The Opiner
    Apr 24 at 15:39













22












22








22


0






In Game of Thrones S08E02 "A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms", it is repeatedly mentioned by multiple characters (I counted six) that when the Night King and the Army of the Dead attack, the Winterfell crypts are the safest place to be for women, children and old people.



But why is that? As far as I can see, it's got a single way down with lots of steps and poorly lit. If the dead win, the people there will be slaughtered with no way out. In any other place, they would have a chance to run at least.



Why would this be the safest place?










share|improve this question
















In Game of Thrones S08E02 "A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms", it is repeatedly mentioned by multiple characters (I counted six) that when the Night King and the Army of the Dead attack, the Winterfell crypts are the safest place to be for women, children and old people.



But why is that? As far as I can see, it's got a single way down with lots of steps and poorly lit. If the dead win, the people there will be slaughtered with no way out. In any other place, they would have a chance to run at least.



Why would this be the safest place?







game-of-thrones a-song-of-ice-and-fire






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 24 at 5:44









Loong

96021431




96021431










asked Apr 22 at 17:31









KharoBangdoKharoBangdo

7,083104180




7,083104180







  • 22





    The crypts are huge, so you can protect a lot of people in one place. One way in means only one entrance to defend.

    – svenvo7
    Apr 22 at 17:36






  • 6





    Also there are no windows so they will not see the end coming from miles away.

    – mckenzm
    Apr 23 at 4:06






  • 3





    I'm pretty sure they're setting things up for the dead in the crypts to be raise by the Night King. Hence all the commentary about defending folks down there and so on as well as what you pointed out. A kind of Chekov's Zombie, if you will.

    – Paul
    Apr 23 at 21:41






  • 2





    @Paul I just read a theory that Bran refused to stay in the crypts because that will break the magic if any because of Night King mark.

    – KharoBangdo
    Apr 24 at 7:58






  • 1





    @Paul Ahhhh, oops. But surely the dead are sealed in stone boxes, or are ashes, or are so far gone they're just bundles of rags? Be cool to see Sean Bean come back as zombie Sean Bean, though. (Briefly.)

    – Grimm The Opiner
    Apr 24 at 15:39












  • 22





    The crypts are huge, so you can protect a lot of people in one place. One way in means only one entrance to defend.

    – svenvo7
    Apr 22 at 17:36






  • 6





    Also there are no windows so they will not see the end coming from miles away.

    – mckenzm
    Apr 23 at 4:06






  • 3





    I'm pretty sure they're setting things up for the dead in the crypts to be raise by the Night King. Hence all the commentary about defending folks down there and so on as well as what you pointed out. A kind of Chekov's Zombie, if you will.

    – Paul
    Apr 23 at 21:41






  • 2





    @Paul I just read a theory that Bran refused to stay in the crypts because that will break the magic if any because of Night King mark.

    – KharoBangdo
    Apr 24 at 7:58






  • 1





    @Paul Ahhhh, oops. But surely the dead are sealed in stone boxes, or are ashes, or are so far gone they're just bundles of rags? Be cool to see Sean Bean come back as zombie Sean Bean, though. (Briefly.)

    – Grimm The Opiner
    Apr 24 at 15:39







22




22





The crypts are huge, so you can protect a lot of people in one place. One way in means only one entrance to defend.

– svenvo7
Apr 22 at 17:36





The crypts are huge, so you can protect a lot of people in one place. One way in means only one entrance to defend.

– svenvo7
Apr 22 at 17:36




6




6





Also there are no windows so they will not see the end coming from miles away.

– mckenzm
Apr 23 at 4:06





Also there are no windows so they will not see the end coming from miles away.

– mckenzm
Apr 23 at 4:06




3




3





I'm pretty sure they're setting things up for the dead in the crypts to be raise by the Night King. Hence all the commentary about defending folks down there and so on as well as what you pointed out. A kind of Chekov's Zombie, if you will.

– Paul
Apr 23 at 21:41





I'm pretty sure they're setting things up for the dead in the crypts to be raise by the Night King. Hence all the commentary about defending folks down there and so on as well as what you pointed out. A kind of Chekov's Zombie, if you will.

– Paul
Apr 23 at 21:41




2




2





@Paul I just read a theory that Bran refused to stay in the crypts because that will break the magic if any because of Night King mark.

– KharoBangdo
Apr 24 at 7:58





@Paul I just read a theory that Bran refused to stay in the crypts because that will break the magic if any because of Night King mark.

– KharoBangdo
Apr 24 at 7:58




1




1





@Paul Ahhhh, oops. But surely the dead are sealed in stone boxes, or are ashes, or are so far gone they're just bundles of rags? Be cool to see Sean Bean come back as zombie Sean Bean, though. (Briefly.)

– Grimm The Opiner
Apr 24 at 15:39





@Paul Ahhhh, oops. But surely the dead are sealed in stone boxes, or are ashes, or are so far gone they're just bundles of rags? Be cool to see Sean Bean come back as zombie Sean Bean, though. (Briefly.)

– Grimm The Opiner
Apr 24 at 15:39










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















56














It is the safest place while the battle rages on, similar to the Battle of Helm's Deep in LOTR: while in the crypt/cave, the non-combatant are out of harms way, and in no risk of being hit by a stray projectile or shrapnel. Plus, if the defenses are breached, then there is no risk of any number of civilians falling in the hands of the enemy to be slaughtered and join the Army of the Dead.



Of course, if they lose the battle, then everyone dies, but that's why they are fighting in the first place: to avoid being wiped out.



If they win, then the civilians, used in the modern sense opposed to military people, are safe and sound and can tend to the wounded combatants who survived the battle and start rebuilding and such.



As for running, it's highly unlikely that the women, children and old people would go very far before being caught by the Army of the Dead and slaughtered in the open fields. Especially since winter has finally come. There is no running from the Army of the Dead. Besides, from a strategic standpoint, any way out is also a potential way in.






share|improve this answer


















  • 47





    Though there may be some concern about hiding the people least able to defend themselves in sealed, dark caverns filled with corpses when their attackers can raise the dead to fight for them.

    – Upper_Case
    Apr 22 at 18:33






  • 15





    I think it's a perfect example of the idiot plot, ie characters doing stupid things in order to advance the plot, eg hiding in the cemetery when your enemy is a necromancer...

    – Rebel-Scum
    Apr 22 at 18:38







  • 29





    @Upper_Case: I would expect that the crypts of Winterfell have, over and over, been used to shelter the non-combattants. At this point, it's probably a reflex: battle coming => non-combattants in the crypt. And so it suffers from the same problem as any reflex: people have stopped thinking about it, especially when their mind is already preoccupied with attempting to win against such a huge army.

    – Matthieu M.
    Apr 22 at 19:31






  • 6





    Any corpses down there are surely dust and grime by this point, and even if they weren't there'd be stupidly heavy stone slabs over them. Not a great example of the "idiot plot" as claimed above.

    – Sarah Z.
    Apr 22 at 20:16







  • 4





    We've nowhere near enough evidence to imagine that we definitively know how the Walkers' powers work and, more relevantly, the show's characters have even less (though the books give some decent clues that the crypts are probably a reasonable risk to take, with the lack of good alternatives). It's not clearly the case that the crypts are a problem, but saying they're definitely safe is too strong. The big leap is that they can raise the dead at all, not that they could raise them in case B as well as case A. The characters should be ready for problems in the crypt, but don't seem to be.

    – Upper_Case
    Apr 23 at 13:57


















16














Sava's answer is correct, but I wanted to respond to part of your question.




But why is that? As far as I can see, it's got a single way down...




You see it as "only one way out". However, someone who is defending sees it as "only one way in", which means that when you are able to defend this chokepoint, you can keep everyone safe.



This is exactly why castles have a wall and a handful of gates (or often just one): the less gates into the castle, the more resources/manpower you can dedicate towards defending these gates.



To paraphrase The Man In The Iron Mask, when the commander explains to the king why they cannot beat the four musketeers who are entreched in a hallway: "The chokepoint of the corridor negates our superior numbers".




with lots of steps




The civilians won't be moving much when they're in there, why would the steps matter?




& poorly lit.




Again, there's little reason for the civilians to need good lighting while they're hiding. They're not doing anything. I also don't see why they couldn't just light the crypts better if they really needed to.



Additionally, for a human enemy, should the enemy enter the crypts, it makes you more likely not get spotted when you hide. Or even when you do fight back, your eyes are used to the dark and the enemy's are not yet, which again gives the defender the advantage.




Why would this be the safest place?




Because statistically it has been. Consider that White Walkers haven't been seen for a thousand years, but human wars have happened pretty much every generation. This is a centuries' old habit: hide the civilians in the crypts, because it's the best place to keep them safe from the battle that rages on outside.



There is a strong consensus on the tactical benefit of hiding the non-combatants and to keep them safe. This is for two reasons: the soldiers don't need to worry about the safety of they family and can instead focus on the battle, and keeping the civilians safe means they can assist with the post-battle fallout (tend to the wounded, clear rubble, restore things).



They did it in King's Landing with the Battle of Blackwater Bay (it's the scene where Cersei talks to Sansa about having instructed the guard to kill her and her children should the safe place be breached, so that she is not taken by the enemy). Jumping to another franchise, one of the best known use cases of this tactic is in Lord of the Rings, in the Battle for Helm's Deep.



You should consider this safe place as a "keep within the keep". They are the second walls, when the first wall is taken by the enemy.






share|improve this answer
































    6














    This is the best way to assure their safety and have the most probable outcome for winning. If the non-combatants were to be hidden away in a different town farther inland, there is still the chance that a part of the undead force could break off and attack (or even the golden company). This would mean that the troops at Winterfell would need to detach a size-able group to accompany them to protect them "just in case". They are considerably outnumbered now and need every fighter they can get, so splitting the forces wouldn't really be a feasible option.



    With the non-combatants staying IN Winterfell, not only are all of the troops together in one place to provide the best offense they can, they are also assured and not as worried about their loved-ones well being. They know where the non-combatants are, underground (out of the reach of the enemy), and the only way they will be come endangered is if all the fighters at Winterfell are defeated, in which case, they would be doomed no matter where they were.



    With their loved ones near and depending on them, the average person is also probably willing to fight harder to make sure they stay protected. This is the last stand, they're putting all of their chips into one basket because to split them up against a force as large as the undead would be result in decimation.






    share|improve this answer






























      1














      There is a slightly more morbid reason to have the non-fighters corralled in a single place. It's so that, if the defenders can see they're losing the fight, they can themselves kill and torch them humanely before killing themselves, so prevent them from being captured and turned. It's reasonable to expect the people hiding to panic and try to run in such a situation, but from humanity's point of view it's more important that the enemy's army doesn't grow more than it has to.






      share|improve this answer


















      • 3





        This seems incredibly unlikely to be the reason.

        – TheLethalCarrot
        Apr 23 at 14:09






      • 1





        I can understand them not wanting their friends and family to turn, but not adding to the NK's army doesn't really matter if they lose their last stand.

        – Ivo van der Veeken
        Apr 23 at 14:11






      • 7





        I deem it quite unlikely that the defenders of Winterfell would do that. They're more likely to fight to the last warrior and die on the steps of the crypt trying to defend the civilians than kill them themselves. Burning civilians is something that Cersei would do with no remorse, not Jon Snow and party.

        – Sava
        Apr 23 at 14:16


















      -1














      Those stone tombs are too heavy for the dead to open. So even if the Night's King raises e.g. Ned and Lyanna, they wouldn't be able to get out of their crypts to attack the living people.






      share|improve this answer


















      • 1





        I never implied in my question that dead Starks will wake up. Neither does any character that mentions crypts. Maybe only Bran has some idea. I asked from a strategic pov

        – KharoBangdo
        Apr 24 at 8:01











      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "186"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f209561%2fwhy-do-people-think-winterfell-crypts-is-the-safest-place-for-women-children-an%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes








      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      56














      It is the safest place while the battle rages on, similar to the Battle of Helm's Deep in LOTR: while in the crypt/cave, the non-combatant are out of harms way, and in no risk of being hit by a stray projectile or shrapnel. Plus, if the defenses are breached, then there is no risk of any number of civilians falling in the hands of the enemy to be slaughtered and join the Army of the Dead.



      Of course, if they lose the battle, then everyone dies, but that's why they are fighting in the first place: to avoid being wiped out.



      If they win, then the civilians, used in the modern sense opposed to military people, are safe and sound and can tend to the wounded combatants who survived the battle and start rebuilding and such.



      As for running, it's highly unlikely that the women, children and old people would go very far before being caught by the Army of the Dead and slaughtered in the open fields. Especially since winter has finally come. There is no running from the Army of the Dead. Besides, from a strategic standpoint, any way out is also a potential way in.






      share|improve this answer


















      • 47





        Though there may be some concern about hiding the people least able to defend themselves in sealed, dark caverns filled with corpses when their attackers can raise the dead to fight for them.

        – Upper_Case
        Apr 22 at 18:33






      • 15





        I think it's a perfect example of the idiot plot, ie characters doing stupid things in order to advance the plot, eg hiding in the cemetery when your enemy is a necromancer...

        – Rebel-Scum
        Apr 22 at 18:38







      • 29





        @Upper_Case: I would expect that the crypts of Winterfell have, over and over, been used to shelter the non-combattants. At this point, it's probably a reflex: battle coming => non-combattants in the crypt. And so it suffers from the same problem as any reflex: people have stopped thinking about it, especially when their mind is already preoccupied with attempting to win against such a huge army.

        – Matthieu M.
        Apr 22 at 19:31






      • 6





        Any corpses down there are surely dust and grime by this point, and even if they weren't there'd be stupidly heavy stone slabs over them. Not a great example of the "idiot plot" as claimed above.

        – Sarah Z.
        Apr 22 at 20:16







      • 4





        We've nowhere near enough evidence to imagine that we definitively know how the Walkers' powers work and, more relevantly, the show's characters have even less (though the books give some decent clues that the crypts are probably a reasonable risk to take, with the lack of good alternatives). It's not clearly the case that the crypts are a problem, but saying they're definitely safe is too strong. The big leap is that they can raise the dead at all, not that they could raise them in case B as well as case A. The characters should be ready for problems in the crypt, but don't seem to be.

        – Upper_Case
        Apr 23 at 13:57















      56














      It is the safest place while the battle rages on, similar to the Battle of Helm's Deep in LOTR: while in the crypt/cave, the non-combatant are out of harms way, and in no risk of being hit by a stray projectile or shrapnel. Plus, if the defenses are breached, then there is no risk of any number of civilians falling in the hands of the enemy to be slaughtered and join the Army of the Dead.



      Of course, if they lose the battle, then everyone dies, but that's why they are fighting in the first place: to avoid being wiped out.



      If they win, then the civilians, used in the modern sense opposed to military people, are safe and sound and can tend to the wounded combatants who survived the battle and start rebuilding and such.



      As for running, it's highly unlikely that the women, children and old people would go very far before being caught by the Army of the Dead and slaughtered in the open fields. Especially since winter has finally come. There is no running from the Army of the Dead. Besides, from a strategic standpoint, any way out is also a potential way in.






      share|improve this answer


















      • 47





        Though there may be some concern about hiding the people least able to defend themselves in sealed, dark caverns filled with corpses when their attackers can raise the dead to fight for them.

        – Upper_Case
        Apr 22 at 18:33






      • 15





        I think it's a perfect example of the idiot plot, ie characters doing stupid things in order to advance the plot, eg hiding in the cemetery when your enemy is a necromancer...

        – Rebel-Scum
        Apr 22 at 18:38







      • 29





        @Upper_Case: I would expect that the crypts of Winterfell have, over and over, been used to shelter the non-combattants. At this point, it's probably a reflex: battle coming => non-combattants in the crypt. And so it suffers from the same problem as any reflex: people have stopped thinking about it, especially when their mind is already preoccupied with attempting to win against such a huge army.

        – Matthieu M.
        Apr 22 at 19:31






      • 6





        Any corpses down there are surely dust and grime by this point, and even if they weren't there'd be stupidly heavy stone slabs over them. Not a great example of the "idiot plot" as claimed above.

        – Sarah Z.
        Apr 22 at 20:16







      • 4





        We've nowhere near enough evidence to imagine that we definitively know how the Walkers' powers work and, more relevantly, the show's characters have even less (though the books give some decent clues that the crypts are probably a reasonable risk to take, with the lack of good alternatives). It's not clearly the case that the crypts are a problem, but saying they're definitely safe is too strong. The big leap is that they can raise the dead at all, not that they could raise them in case B as well as case A. The characters should be ready for problems in the crypt, but don't seem to be.

        – Upper_Case
        Apr 23 at 13:57













      56












      56








      56







      It is the safest place while the battle rages on, similar to the Battle of Helm's Deep in LOTR: while in the crypt/cave, the non-combatant are out of harms way, and in no risk of being hit by a stray projectile or shrapnel. Plus, if the defenses are breached, then there is no risk of any number of civilians falling in the hands of the enemy to be slaughtered and join the Army of the Dead.



      Of course, if they lose the battle, then everyone dies, but that's why they are fighting in the first place: to avoid being wiped out.



      If they win, then the civilians, used in the modern sense opposed to military people, are safe and sound and can tend to the wounded combatants who survived the battle and start rebuilding and such.



      As for running, it's highly unlikely that the women, children and old people would go very far before being caught by the Army of the Dead and slaughtered in the open fields. Especially since winter has finally come. There is no running from the Army of the Dead. Besides, from a strategic standpoint, any way out is also a potential way in.






      share|improve this answer













      It is the safest place while the battle rages on, similar to the Battle of Helm's Deep in LOTR: while in the crypt/cave, the non-combatant are out of harms way, and in no risk of being hit by a stray projectile or shrapnel. Plus, if the defenses are breached, then there is no risk of any number of civilians falling in the hands of the enemy to be slaughtered and join the Army of the Dead.



      Of course, if they lose the battle, then everyone dies, but that's why they are fighting in the first place: to avoid being wiped out.



      If they win, then the civilians, used in the modern sense opposed to military people, are safe and sound and can tend to the wounded combatants who survived the battle and start rebuilding and such.



      As for running, it's highly unlikely that the women, children and old people would go very far before being caught by the Army of the Dead and slaughtered in the open fields. Especially since winter has finally come. There is no running from the Army of the Dead. Besides, from a strategic standpoint, any way out is also a potential way in.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered Apr 22 at 17:39









      SavaSava

      4,81011761




      4,81011761







      • 47





        Though there may be some concern about hiding the people least able to defend themselves in sealed, dark caverns filled with corpses when their attackers can raise the dead to fight for them.

        – Upper_Case
        Apr 22 at 18:33






      • 15





        I think it's a perfect example of the idiot plot, ie characters doing stupid things in order to advance the plot, eg hiding in the cemetery when your enemy is a necromancer...

        – Rebel-Scum
        Apr 22 at 18:38







      • 29





        @Upper_Case: I would expect that the crypts of Winterfell have, over and over, been used to shelter the non-combattants. At this point, it's probably a reflex: battle coming => non-combattants in the crypt. And so it suffers from the same problem as any reflex: people have stopped thinking about it, especially when their mind is already preoccupied with attempting to win against such a huge army.

        – Matthieu M.
        Apr 22 at 19:31






      • 6





        Any corpses down there are surely dust and grime by this point, and even if they weren't there'd be stupidly heavy stone slabs over them. Not a great example of the "idiot plot" as claimed above.

        – Sarah Z.
        Apr 22 at 20:16







      • 4





        We've nowhere near enough evidence to imagine that we definitively know how the Walkers' powers work and, more relevantly, the show's characters have even less (though the books give some decent clues that the crypts are probably a reasonable risk to take, with the lack of good alternatives). It's not clearly the case that the crypts are a problem, but saying they're definitely safe is too strong. The big leap is that they can raise the dead at all, not that they could raise them in case B as well as case A. The characters should be ready for problems in the crypt, but don't seem to be.

        – Upper_Case
        Apr 23 at 13:57












      • 47





        Though there may be some concern about hiding the people least able to defend themselves in sealed, dark caverns filled with corpses when their attackers can raise the dead to fight for them.

        – Upper_Case
        Apr 22 at 18:33






      • 15





        I think it's a perfect example of the idiot plot, ie characters doing stupid things in order to advance the plot, eg hiding in the cemetery when your enemy is a necromancer...

        – Rebel-Scum
        Apr 22 at 18:38







      • 29





        @Upper_Case: I would expect that the crypts of Winterfell have, over and over, been used to shelter the non-combattants. At this point, it's probably a reflex: battle coming => non-combattants in the crypt. And so it suffers from the same problem as any reflex: people have stopped thinking about it, especially when their mind is already preoccupied with attempting to win against such a huge army.

        – Matthieu M.
        Apr 22 at 19:31






      • 6





        Any corpses down there are surely dust and grime by this point, and even if they weren't there'd be stupidly heavy stone slabs over them. Not a great example of the "idiot plot" as claimed above.

        – Sarah Z.
        Apr 22 at 20:16







      • 4





        We've nowhere near enough evidence to imagine that we definitively know how the Walkers' powers work and, more relevantly, the show's characters have even less (though the books give some decent clues that the crypts are probably a reasonable risk to take, with the lack of good alternatives). It's not clearly the case that the crypts are a problem, but saying they're definitely safe is too strong. The big leap is that they can raise the dead at all, not that they could raise them in case B as well as case A. The characters should be ready for problems in the crypt, but don't seem to be.

        – Upper_Case
        Apr 23 at 13:57







      47




      47





      Though there may be some concern about hiding the people least able to defend themselves in sealed, dark caverns filled with corpses when their attackers can raise the dead to fight for them.

      – Upper_Case
      Apr 22 at 18:33





      Though there may be some concern about hiding the people least able to defend themselves in sealed, dark caverns filled with corpses when their attackers can raise the dead to fight for them.

      – Upper_Case
      Apr 22 at 18:33




      15




      15





      I think it's a perfect example of the idiot plot, ie characters doing stupid things in order to advance the plot, eg hiding in the cemetery when your enemy is a necromancer...

      – Rebel-Scum
      Apr 22 at 18:38






      I think it's a perfect example of the idiot plot, ie characters doing stupid things in order to advance the plot, eg hiding in the cemetery when your enemy is a necromancer...

      – Rebel-Scum
      Apr 22 at 18:38





      29




      29





      @Upper_Case: I would expect that the crypts of Winterfell have, over and over, been used to shelter the non-combattants. At this point, it's probably a reflex: battle coming => non-combattants in the crypt. And so it suffers from the same problem as any reflex: people have stopped thinking about it, especially when their mind is already preoccupied with attempting to win against such a huge army.

      – Matthieu M.
      Apr 22 at 19:31





      @Upper_Case: I would expect that the crypts of Winterfell have, over and over, been used to shelter the non-combattants. At this point, it's probably a reflex: battle coming => non-combattants in the crypt. And so it suffers from the same problem as any reflex: people have stopped thinking about it, especially when their mind is already preoccupied with attempting to win against such a huge army.

      – Matthieu M.
      Apr 22 at 19:31




      6




      6





      Any corpses down there are surely dust and grime by this point, and even if they weren't there'd be stupidly heavy stone slabs over them. Not a great example of the "idiot plot" as claimed above.

      – Sarah Z.
      Apr 22 at 20:16






      Any corpses down there are surely dust and grime by this point, and even if they weren't there'd be stupidly heavy stone slabs over them. Not a great example of the "idiot plot" as claimed above.

      – Sarah Z.
      Apr 22 at 20:16





      4




      4





      We've nowhere near enough evidence to imagine that we definitively know how the Walkers' powers work and, more relevantly, the show's characters have even less (though the books give some decent clues that the crypts are probably a reasonable risk to take, with the lack of good alternatives). It's not clearly the case that the crypts are a problem, but saying they're definitely safe is too strong. The big leap is that they can raise the dead at all, not that they could raise them in case B as well as case A. The characters should be ready for problems in the crypt, but don't seem to be.

      – Upper_Case
      Apr 23 at 13:57





      We've nowhere near enough evidence to imagine that we definitively know how the Walkers' powers work and, more relevantly, the show's characters have even less (though the books give some decent clues that the crypts are probably a reasonable risk to take, with the lack of good alternatives). It's not clearly the case that the crypts are a problem, but saying they're definitely safe is too strong. The big leap is that they can raise the dead at all, not that they could raise them in case B as well as case A. The characters should be ready for problems in the crypt, but don't seem to be.

      – Upper_Case
      Apr 23 at 13:57













      16














      Sava's answer is correct, but I wanted to respond to part of your question.




      But why is that? As far as I can see, it's got a single way down...




      You see it as "only one way out". However, someone who is defending sees it as "only one way in", which means that when you are able to defend this chokepoint, you can keep everyone safe.



      This is exactly why castles have a wall and a handful of gates (or often just one): the less gates into the castle, the more resources/manpower you can dedicate towards defending these gates.



      To paraphrase The Man In The Iron Mask, when the commander explains to the king why they cannot beat the four musketeers who are entreched in a hallway: "The chokepoint of the corridor negates our superior numbers".




      with lots of steps




      The civilians won't be moving much when they're in there, why would the steps matter?




      & poorly lit.




      Again, there's little reason for the civilians to need good lighting while they're hiding. They're not doing anything. I also don't see why they couldn't just light the crypts better if they really needed to.



      Additionally, for a human enemy, should the enemy enter the crypts, it makes you more likely not get spotted when you hide. Or even when you do fight back, your eyes are used to the dark and the enemy's are not yet, which again gives the defender the advantage.




      Why would this be the safest place?




      Because statistically it has been. Consider that White Walkers haven't been seen for a thousand years, but human wars have happened pretty much every generation. This is a centuries' old habit: hide the civilians in the crypts, because it's the best place to keep them safe from the battle that rages on outside.



      There is a strong consensus on the tactical benefit of hiding the non-combatants and to keep them safe. This is for two reasons: the soldiers don't need to worry about the safety of they family and can instead focus on the battle, and keeping the civilians safe means they can assist with the post-battle fallout (tend to the wounded, clear rubble, restore things).



      They did it in King's Landing with the Battle of Blackwater Bay (it's the scene where Cersei talks to Sansa about having instructed the guard to kill her and her children should the safe place be breached, so that she is not taken by the enemy). Jumping to another franchise, one of the best known use cases of this tactic is in Lord of the Rings, in the Battle for Helm's Deep.



      You should consider this safe place as a "keep within the keep". They are the second walls, when the first wall is taken by the enemy.






      share|improve this answer





























        16














        Sava's answer is correct, but I wanted to respond to part of your question.




        But why is that? As far as I can see, it's got a single way down...




        You see it as "only one way out". However, someone who is defending sees it as "only one way in", which means that when you are able to defend this chokepoint, you can keep everyone safe.



        This is exactly why castles have a wall and a handful of gates (or often just one): the less gates into the castle, the more resources/manpower you can dedicate towards defending these gates.



        To paraphrase The Man In The Iron Mask, when the commander explains to the king why they cannot beat the four musketeers who are entreched in a hallway: "The chokepoint of the corridor negates our superior numbers".




        with lots of steps




        The civilians won't be moving much when they're in there, why would the steps matter?




        & poorly lit.




        Again, there's little reason for the civilians to need good lighting while they're hiding. They're not doing anything. I also don't see why they couldn't just light the crypts better if they really needed to.



        Additionally, for a human enemy, should the enemy enter the crypts, it makes you more likely not get spotted when you hide. Or even when you do fight back, your eyes are used to the dark and the enemy's are not yet, which again gives the defender the advantage.




        Why would this be the safest place?




        Because statistically it has been. Consider that White Walkers haven't been seen for a thousand years, but human wars have happened pretty much every generation. This is a centuries' old habit: hide the civilians in the crypts, because it's the best place to keep them safe from the battle that rages on outside.



        There is a strong consensus on the tactical benefit of hiding the non-combatants and to keep them safe. This is for two reasons: the soldiers don't need to worry about the safety of they family and can instead focus on the battle, and keeping the civilians safe means they can assist with the post-battle fallout (tend to the wounded, clear rubble, restore things).



        They did it in King's Landing with the Battle of Blackwater Bay (it's the scene where Cersei talks to Sansa about having instructed the guard to kill her and her children should the safe place be breached, so that she is not taken by the enemy). Jumping to another franchise, one of the best known use cases of this tactic is in Lord of the Rings, in the Battle for Helm's Deep.



        You should consider this safe place as a "keep within the keep". They are the second walls, when the first wall is taken by the enemy.






        share|improve this answer



























          16












          16








          16







          Sava's answer is correct, but I wanted to respond to part of your question.




          But why is that? As far as I can see, it's got a single way down...




          You see it as "only one way out". However, someone who is defending sees it as "only one way in", which means that when you are able to defend this chokepoint, you can keep everyone safe.



          This is exactly why castles have a wall and a handful of gates (or often just one): the less gates into the castle, the more resources/manpower you can dedicate towards defending these gates.



          To paraphrase The Man In The Iron Mask, when the commander explains to the king why they cannot beat the four musketeers who are entreched in a hallway: "The chokepoint of the corridor negates our superior numbers".




          with lots of steps




          The civilians won't be moving much when they're in there, why would the steps matter?




          & poorly lit.




          Again, there's little reason for the civilians to need good lighting while they're hiding. They're not doing anything. I also don't see why they couldn't just light the crypts better if they really needed to.



          Additionally, for a human enemy, should the enemy enter the crypts, it makes you more likely not get spotted when you hide. Or even when you do fight back, your eyes are used to the dark and the enemy's are not yet, which again gives the defender the advantage.




          Why would this be the safest place?




          Because statistically it has been. Consider that White Walkers haven't been seen for a thousand years, but human wars have happened pretty much every generation. This is a centuries' old habit: hide the civilians in the crypts, because it's the best place to keep them safe from the battle that rages on outside.



          There is a strong consensus on the tactical benefit of hiding the non-combatants and to keep them safe. This is for two reasons: the soldiers don't need to worry about the safety of they family and can instead focus on the battle, and keeping the civilians safe means they can assist with the post-battle fallout (tend to the wounded, clear rubble, restore things).



          They did it in King's Landing with the Battle of Blackwater Bay (it's the scene where Cersei talks to Sansa about having instructed the guard to kill her and her children should the safe place be breached, so that she is not taken by the enemy). Jumping to another franchise, one of the best known use cases of this tactic is in Lord of the Rings, in the Battle for Helm's Deep.



          You should consider this safe place as a "keep within the keep". They are the second walls, when the first wall is taken by the enemy.






          share|improve this answer















          Sava's answer is correct, but I wanted to respond to part of your question.




          But why is that? As far as I can see, it's got a single way down...




          You see it as "only one way out". However, someone who is defending sees it as "only one way in", which means that when you are able to defend this chokepoint, you can keep everyone safe.



          This is exactly why castles have a wall and a handful of gates (or often just one): the less gates into the castle, the more resources/manpower you can dedicate towards defending these gates.



          To paraphrase The Man In The Iron Mask, when the commander explains to the king why they cannot beat the four musketeers who are entreched in a hallway: "The chokepoint of the corridor negates our superior numbers".




          with lots of steps




          The civilians won't be moving much when they're in there, why would the steps matter?




          & poorly lit.




          Again, there's little reason for the civilians to need good lighting while they're hiding. They're not doing anything. I also don't see why they couldn't just light the crypts better if they really needed to.



          Additionally, for a human enemy, should the enemy enter the crypts, it makes you more likely not get spotted when you hide. Or even when you do fight back, your eyes are used to the dark and the enemy's are not yet, which again gives the defender the advantage.




          Why would this be the safest place?




          Because statistically it has been. Consider that White Walkers haven't been seen for a thousand years, but human wars have happened pretty much every generation. This is a centuries' old habit: hide the civilians in the crypts, because it's the best place to keep them safe from the battle that rages on outside.



          There is a strong consensus on the tactical benefit of hiding the non-combatants and to keep them safe. This is for two reasons: the soldiers don't need to worry about the safety of they family and can instead focus on the battle, and keeping the civilians safe means they can assist with the post-battle fallout (tend to the wounded, clear rubble, restore things).



          They did it in King's Landing with the Battle of Blackwater Bay (it's the scene where Cersei talks to Sansa about having instructed the guard to kill her and her children should the safe place be breached, so that she is not taken by the enemy). Jumping to another franchise, one of the best known use cases of this tactic is in Lord of the Rings, in the Battle for Helm's Deep.



          You should consider this safe place as a "keep within the keep". They are the second walls, when the first wall is taken by the enemy.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Apr 23 at 11:28

























          answered Apr 23 at 9:04









          FlaterFlater

          7,19612130




          7,19612130





















              6














              This is the best way to assure their safety and have the most probable outcome for winning. If the non-combatants were to be hidden away in a different town farther inland, there is still the chance that a part of the undead force could break off and attack (or even the golden company). This would mean that the troops at Winterfell would need to detach a size-able group to accompany them to protect them "just in case". They are considerably outnumbered now and need every fighter they can get, so splitting the forces wouldn't really be a feasible option.



              With the non-combatants staying IN Winterfell, not only are all of the troops together in one place to provide the best offense they can, they are also assured and not as worried about their loved-ones well being. They know where the non-combatants are, underground (out of the reach of the enemy), and the only way they will be come endangered is if all the fighters at Winterfell are defeated, in which case, they would be doomed no matter where they were.



              With their loved ones near and depending on them, the average person is also probably willing to fight harder to make sure they stay protected. This is the last stand, they're putting all of their chips into one basket because to split them up against a force as large as the undead would be result in decimation.






              share|improve this answer



























                6














                This is the best way to assure their safety and have the most probable outcome for winning. If the non-combatants were to be hidden away in a different town farther inland, there is still the chance that a part of the undead force could break off and attack (or even the golden company). This would mean that the troops at Winterfell would need to detach a size-able group to accompany them to protect them "just in case". They are considerably outnumbered now and need every fighter they can get, so splitting the forces wouldn't really be a feasible option.



                With the non-combatants staying IN Winterfell, not only are all of the troops together in one place to provide the best offense they can, they are also assured and not as worried about their loved-ones well being. They know where the non-combatants are, underground (out of the reach of the enemy), and the only way they will be come endangered is if all the fighters at Winterfell are defeated, in which case, they would be doomed no matter where they were.



                With their loved ones near and depending on them, the average person is also probably willing to fight harder to make sure they stay protected. This is the last stand, they're putting all of their chips into one basket because to split them up against a force as large as the undead would be result in decimation.






                share|improve this answer

























                  6












                  6








                  6







                  This is the best way to assure their safety and have the most probable outcome for winning. If the non-combatants were to be hidden away in a different town farther inland, there is still the chance that a part of the undead force could break off and attack (or even the golden company). This would mean that the troops at Winterfell would need to detach a size-able group to accompany them to protect them "just in case". They are considerably outnumbered now and need every fighter they can get, so splitting the forces wouldn't really be a feasible option.



                  With the non-combatants staying IN Winterfell, not only are all of the troops together in one place to provide the best offense they can, they are also assured and not as worried about their loved-ones well being. They know where the non-combatants are, underground (out of the reach of the enemy), and the only way they will be come endangered is if all the fighters at Winterfell are defeated, in which case, they would be doomed no matter where they were.



                  With their loved ones near and depending on them, the average person is also probably willing to fight harder to make sure they stay protected. This is the last stand, they're putting all of their chips into one basket because to split them up against a force as large as the undead would be result in decimation.






                  share|improve this answer













                  This is the best way to assure their safety and have the most probable outcome for winning. If the non-combatants were to be hidden away in a different town farther inland, there is still the chance that a part of the undead force could break off and attack (or even the golden company). This would mean that the troops at Winterfell would need to detach a size-able group to accompany them to protect them "just in case". They are considerably outnumbered now and need every fighter they can get, so splitting the forces wouldn't really be a feasible option.



                  With the non-combatants staying IN Winterfell, not only are all of the troops together in one place to provide the best offense they can, they are also assured and not as worried about their loved-ones well being. They know where the non-combatants are, underground (out of the reach of the enemy), and the only way they will be come endangered is if all the fighters at Winterfell are defeated, in which case, they would be doomed no matter where they were.



                  With their loved ones near and depending on them, the average person is also probably willing to fight harder to make sure they stay protected. This is the last stand, they're putting all of their chips into one basket because to split them up against a force as large as the undead would be result in decimation.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Apr 23 at 18:29









                  SensoraySensoray

                  1,049517




                  1,049517





















                      1














                      There is a slightly more morbid reason to have the non-fighters corralled in a single place. It's so that, if the defenders can see they're losing the fight, they can themselves kill and torch them humanely before killing themselves, so prevent them from being captured and turned. It's reasonable to expect the people hiding to panic and try to run in such a situation, but from humanity's point of view it's more important that the enemy's army doesn't grow more than it has to.






                      share|improve this answer


















                      • 3





                        This seems incredibly unlikely to be the reason.

                        – TheLethalCarrot
                        Apr 23 at 14:09






                      • 1





                        I can understand them not wanting their friends and family to turn, but not adding to the NK's army doesn't really matter if they lose their last stand.

                        – Ivo van der Veeken
                        Apr 23 at 14:11






                      • 7





                        I deem it quite unlikely that the defenders of Winterfell would do that. They're more likely to fight to the last warrior and die on the steps of the crypt trying to defend the civilians than kill them themselves. Burning civilians is something that Cersei would do with no remorse, not Jon Snow and party.

                        – Sava
                        Apr 23 at 14:16















                      1














                      There is a slightly more morbid reason to have the non-fighters corralled in a single place. It's so that, if the defenders can see they're losing the fight, they can themselves kill and torch them humanely before killing themselves, so prevent them from being captured and turned. It's reasonable to expect the people hiding to panic and try to run in such a situation, but from humanity's point of view it's more important that the enemy's army doesn't grow more than it has to.






                      share|improve this answer


















                      • 3





                        This seems incredibly unlikely to be the reason.

                        – TheLethalCarrot
                        Apr 23 at 14:09






                      • 1





                        I can understand them not wanting their friends and family to turn, but not adding to the NK's army doesn't really matter if they lose their last stand.

                        – Ivo van der Veeken
                        Apr 23 at 14:11






                      • 7





                        I deem it quite unlikely that the defenders of Winterfell would do that. They're more likely to fight to the last warrior and die on the steps of the crypt trying to defend the civilians than kill them themselves. Burning civilians is something that Cersei would do with no remorse, not Jon Snow and party.

                        – Sava
                        Apr 23 at 14:16













                      1












                      1








                      1







                      There is a slightly more morbid reason to have the non-fighters corralled in a single place. It's so that, if the defenders can see they're losing the fight, they can themselves kill and torch them humanely before killing themselves, so prevent them from being captured and turned. It's reasonable to expect the people hiding to panic and try to run in such a situation, but from humanity's point of view it's more important that the enemy's army doesn't grow more than it has to.






                      share|improve this answer













                      There is a slightly more morbid reason to have the non-fighters corralled in a single place. It's so that, if the defenders can see they're losing the fight, they can themselves kill and torch them humanely before killing themselves, so prevent them from being captured and turned. It's reasonable to expect the people hiding to panic and try to run in such a situation, but from humanity's point of view it's more important that the enemy's army doesn't grow more than it has to.







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered Apr 23 at 14:03









                      regularfryregularfry

                      1111




                      1111







                      • 3





                        This seems incredibly unlikely to be the reason.

                        – TheLethalCarrot
                        Apr 23 at 14:09






                      • 1





                        I can understand them not wanting their friends and family to turn, but not adding to the NK's army doesn't really matter if they lose their last stand.

                        – Ivo van der Veeken
                        Apr 23 at 14:11






                      • 7





                        I deem it quite unlikely that the defenders of Winterfell would do that. They're more likely to fight to the last warrior and die on the steps of the crypt trying to defend the civilians than kill them themselves. Burning civilians is something that Cersei would do with no remorse, not Jon Snow and party.

                        – Sava
                        Apr 23 at 14:16












                      • 3





                        This seems incredibly unlikely to be the reason.

                        – TheLethalCarrot
                        Apr 23 at 14:09






                      • 1





                        I can understand them not wanting their friends and family to turn, but not adding to the NK's army doesn't really matter if they lose their last stand.

                        – Ivo van der Veeken
                        Apr 23 at 14:11






                      • 7





                        I deem it quite unlikely that the defenders of Winterfell would do that. They're more likely to fight to the last warrior and die on the steps of the crypt trying to defend the civilians than kill them themselves. Burning civilians is something that Cersei would do with no remorse, not Jon Snow and party.

                        – Sava
                        Apr 23 at 14:16







                      3




                      3





                      This seems incredibly unlikely to be the reason.

                      – TheLethalCarrot
                      Apr 23 at 14:09





                      This seems incredibly unlikely to be the reason.

                      – TheLethalCarrot
                      Apr 23 at 14:09




                      1




                      1





                      I can understand them not wanting their friends and family to turn, but not adding to the NK's army doesn't really matter if they lose their last stand.

                      – Ivo van der Veeken
                      Apr 23 at 14:11





                      I can understand them not wanting their friends and family to turn, but not adding to the NK's army doesn't really matter if they lose their last stand.

                      – Ivo van der Veeken
                      Apr 23 at 14:11




                      7




                      7





                      I deem it quite unlikely that the defenders of Winterfell would do that. They're more likely to fight to the last warrior and die on the steps of the crypt trying to defend the civilians than kill them themselves. Burning civilians is something that Cersei would do with no remorse, not Jon Snow and party.

                      – Sava
                      Apr 23 at 14:16





                      I deem it quite unlikely that the defenders of Winterfell would do that. They're more likely to fight to the last warrior and die on the steps of the crypt trying to defend the civilians than kill them themselves. Burning civilians is something that Cersei would do with no remorse, not Jon Snow and party.

                      – Sava
                      Apr 23 at 14:16











                      -1














                      Those stone tombs are too heavy for the dead to open. So even if the Night's King raises e.g. Ned and Lyanna, they wouldn't be able to get out of their crypts to attack the living people.






                      share|improve this answer


















                      • 1





                        I never implied in my question that dead Starks will wake up. Neither does any character that mentions crypts. Maybe only Bran has some idea. I asked from a strategic pov

                        – KharoBangdo
                        Apr 24 at 8:01















                      -1














                      Those stone tombs are too heavy for the dead to open. So even if the Night's King raises e.g. Ned and Lyanna, they wouldn't be able to get out of their crypts to attack the living people.






                      share|improve this answer


















                      • 1





                        I never implied in my question that dead Starks will wake up. Neither does any character that mentions crypts. Maybe only Bran has some idea. I asked from a strategic pov

                        – KharoBangdo
                        Apr 24 at 8:01













                      -1












                      -1








                      -1







                      Those stone tombs are too heavy for the dead to open. So even if the Night's King raises e.g. Ned and Lyanna, they wouldn't be able to get out of their crypts to attack the living people.






                      share|improve this answer













                      Those stone tombs are too heavy for the dead to open. So even if the Night's King raises e.g. Ned and Lyanna, they wouldn't be able to get out of their crypts to attack the living people.







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered Apr 24 at 6:48









                      Joe CJoe C

                      2,97722342




                      2,97722342







                      • 1





                        I never implied in my question that dead Starks will wake up. Neither does any character that mentions crypts. Maybe only Bran has some idea. I asked from a strategic pov

                        – KharoBangdo
                        Apr 24 at 8:01












                      • 1





                        I never implied in my question that dead Starks will wake up. Neither does any character that mentions crypts. Maybe only Bran has some idea. I asked from a strategic pov

                        – KharoBangdo
                        Apr 24 at 8:01







                      1




                      1





                      I never implied in my question that dead Starks will wake up. Neither does any character that mentions crypts. Maybe only Bran has some idea. I asked from a strategic pov

                      – KharoBangdo
                      Apr 24 at 8:01





                      I never implied in my question that dead Starks will wake up. Neither does any character that mentions crypts. Maybe only Bran has some idea. I asked from a strategic pov

                      – KharoBangdo
                      Apr 24 at 8:01

















                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f209561%2fwhy-do-people-think-winterfell-crypts-is-the-safest-place-for-women-children-an%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Club Baloncesto Breogán Índice Historia | Pavillón | Nome | O Breogán na cultura popular | Xogadores | Adestradores | Presidentes | Palmarés | Historial | Líderes | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióncbbreogan.galCadroGuía oficial da ACB 2009-10, páxina 201Guía oficial ACB 1992, páxina 183. Editorial DB.É de 6.500 espectadores sentados axeitándose á última normativa"Estudiantes Junior, entre as mellores canteiras"o orixinalHemeroteca El Mundo Deportivo, 16 setembro de 1970, páxina 12Historia do BreogánAlfredo Pérez, o último canoneiroHistoria C.B. BreogánHemeroteca de El Mundo DeportivoJimmy Wright, norteamericano do Breogán deixará Lugo por ameazas de morteResultados de Breogán en 1986-87Resultados de Breogán en 1990-91Ficha de Velimir Perasović en acb.comResultados de Breogán en 1994-95Breogán arrasa al Barça. "El Mundo Deportivo", 27 de setembro de 1999, páxina 58CB Breogán - FC BarcelonaA FEB invita a participar nunha nova Liga EuropeaCharlie Bell na prensa estatalMáximos anotadores 2005Tempada 2005-06 : Tódolos Xogadores da Xornada""Non quero pensar nunha man negra, mais pregúntome que está a pasar""o orixinalRaúl López, orgulloso dos xogadores, presume da boa saúde económica do BreogánJulio González confirma que cesa como presidente del BreogánHomenaxe a Lisardo GómezA tempada do rexurdimento celesteEntrevista a Lisardo GómezEl COB dinamita el Pazo para forzar el quinto (69-73)Cafés Candelas, patrocinador del CB Breogán"Suso Lázare, novo presidente do Breogán"o orixinalCafés Candelas Breogán firma el mayor triunfo de la historiaEl Breogán realizará 17 homenajes por su cincuenta aniversario"O Breogán honra ao seu fundador e primeiro presidente"o orixinalMiguel Giao recibiu a homenaxe do PazoHomenaxe aos primeiros gladiadores celestesO home que nos amosa como ver o Breo co corazónTita Franco será homenaxeada polos #50anosdeBreoJulio Vila recibirá unha homenaxe in memoriam polos #50anosdeBreo"O Breogán homenaxeará aos seus aboados máis veteráns"Pechada ovación a «Capi» Sanmartín e Ricardo «Corazón de González»Homenaxe por décadas de informaciónPaco García volve ao Pazo con motivo do 50 aniversario"Resultados y clasificaciones""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, campión da Copa Princesa""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, equipo ACB"C.B. Breogán"Proxecto social"o orixinal"Centros asociados"o orixinalFicha en imdb.comMario Camus trata la recuperación del amor en 'La vieja música', su última película"Páxina web oficial""Club Baloncesto Breogán""C. B. Breogán S.A.D."eehttp://www.fegaba.com

                      Vilaño, A Laracha Índice Patrimonio | Lugares e parroquias | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación43°14′52″N 8°36′03″O / 43.24775, -8.60070

                      Cegueira Índice Epidemioloxía | Deficiencia visual | Tipos de cegueira | Principais causas de cegueira | Tratamento | Técnicas de adaptación e axudas | Vida dos cegos | Primeiros auxilios | Crenzas respecto das persoas cegas | Crenzas das persoas cegas | O neno deficiente visual | Aspectos psicolóxicos da cegueira | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación54.054.154.436928256blindnessDicionario da Real Academia GalegaPortal das Palabras"International Standards: Visual Standards — Aspects and Ranges of Vision Loss with Emphasis on Population Surveys.""Visual impairment and blindness""Presentan un plan para previr a cegueira"o orixinalACCDV Associació Catalana de Cecs i Disminuïts Visuals - PMFTrachoma"Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis"1844137110.1056/NEJMoa0802268Cans guía - os mellores amigos dos cegosArquivadoEscola de cans guía para cegos en Mortágua, PortugalArquivado"Tecnología para ciegos y deficientes visuales. Recopilación de recursos gratuitos en la Red""Colorino""‘COL.diesis’, escuchar los sonidos del color""COL.diesis: Transforming Colour into Melody and Implementing the Result in a Colour Sensor Device"o orixinal"Sistema de desarrollo de sinestesia color-sonido para invidentes utilizando un protocolo de audio""Enseñanza táctil - geometría y color. Juegos didácticos para niños ciegos y videntes""Sistema Constanz"L'ocupació laboral dels cecs a l'Estat espanyol està pràcticament equiparada a la de les persones amb visió, entrevista amb Pedro ZuritaONCE (Organización Nacional de Cegos de España)Prevención da cegueiraDescrición de deficiencias visuais (Disc@pnet)Braillín, un boneco atractivo para calquera neno, con ou sen discapacidade, que permite familiarizarse co sistema de escritura e lectura brailleAxudas Técnicas36838ID00897494007150-90057129528256DOID:1432HP:0000618D001766C10.597.751.941.162C97109C0155020