Genetic variation and structuring in the threatened koala populations of Southeast Queensland AbstractKeywordsNotesReferencesCopyright informationAuthors and AffiliationsAbout this articlePersonalised recommendationsActions
http://activatejavascript.orgConservation GeneticsIssue 6Springer Nature
Skip to main content
Advertisement
Conservation Genetics
Genetic variation and structuring in the threatened koala populations of Southeast Queensland
Research Article
First Online: 15 September 2009
2k
Downloads
46
Citations
Abstract
Habitat fragmentation can act to cause reproductive isolation between conspecifics and undermine species’ persistence, though most studies have reported the genetic condition of populations that have already declined to a very small size. We examined genetic diversity within the vulnerable, declining koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) population in Southeast Queensland, Australia to determine the genetic impact of ongoing threatening processes. Five hundred and twelve koalas from ten Southeast Queensland Local Government Areas on the mainland and one island were genotyped at six polymorphic microsatellite loci. Based on Bayesian cluster analysis incorporating spatial data, the regional koala population was subdivided into six clusters, with location of major roads and rivers appearing to be consistent with being barriers to gene flow. The distribution of mtDNA control region haplotypes identified distinct coastal and inland clades suggesting that historically there was gene flow between koalas along the coast (though little interchange between coastal and inland animals). In contrast, koalas from the Koala Coast (Brisbane City, Logan City and Redland Shire) were shown by microsatellite analysis to be genetically distinct from adjacent areas. It is likely, therefore, that more recent reductions in population size and restricted gene flow through urbanisation have contributed to the genetic differentiation of koalas in the Koala Coast region.
Keywords
Koalas Habitat fragmentation Mitochondrial DNA Microsatellites Genetic isolation Island population
Notes
Acknowledgments
This project was funded by an Australian Research Council Linkage Grant, LP0455785. Thanks to Camryn Allen for providing samples from Burbank and Greg Simmons for sharing Gold Coast samples collected by Steve Phillips. David Pavlacky provided assistance with ArcGIS and Simon Blomberg assisted with performing statistical analyses. Thanks to staff of Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service Moggill Koala Hospital and Australian Wildlife Hospital for collecting samples. Thanks to Cynthia Riginos and the genetics discussion group and two anonymous reviewers for helpful feedback and suggestions.
References
- Aguilar A, Jessup DA, Estes J, Garza JC (2008) The distribution of nuclear genetic variation and historical demography of sea otters. Anim Conserv 11:35–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Belkhir K, Borsa P, Chikhi L, Raufaste N, Bonhomme F (2004) genetix 4.03, logiciel ous Windows pour la genetique des populations. Laboratoire Genome et Populations. Universite deMontpellier II, MontpellierGoogle Scholar
- Carrick FN (1996) A review of disease in Koalas. In: Gordon G (ed) Koalas–research for management—proceedings of the Brisbane Koala symposium. World Koala Research Incorporated, Brisbane, pp 37–41Google Scholar
- Carrick FN (2004) Koala coast protection plan. Report prepared for the premier of Queensland. The University of Queensland Koala Study Program on behalf of the Koala Conservation Council Inc., p 24Google Scholar
- Clement M, Posada D, Crandall KA (2000) TCS: a computer program to estimate genealogies. Mol Ecol 9(10):1657–1660CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cristescu R, Cahill V, Sherwin WB, Handasyde K, Carlyon K, Whisson D, Herbert CA, Carlsson BLJ, Wilton AN, Cooper DW (2009) Inbreeding and testicular abnormalities in a bottlenecked population of koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus). Wildlife Res 36:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dique DS, Preece HJ, Thompson J, de Villiers DL (2004) Determining the distribution and abundance of a regional koala population in South-east Queensland for conservation management. Wildlife Res 31:109–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dixon JD, Oli MK, Wooten MC, Eason TH, McCown JW, Cunningham MW (2007) Genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation and loss: the case of the Florida black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus). Conserv Genet 8:455–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Eldridge MDB, King JM, Loupis AK, Spencer PBS, Taylor AC, Pope LC, Hall GP (1999) Unprecedented low levels of genetic variation and inbreeding depression in an island population of the black-footed rock wallaby. Conserv Biol 13(3):531–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ellis WAH, Girjes AA, Carrick FN, Melzer A (1993) Chlamydial infection in koalas under relatively little alienation pressure. Aust Vet J 70:427–428CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ellis WA, Hale PT, Carrick FN (2002) Breeding dynamics of koalas in open woodlands. Wildlife Res 29:19–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software strcuture: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fowler EV, Houlden BA, Hoeben P, Timms P (2000) Genetic diversity and gene flow among Southeastern Queensland koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus). Mol Ecol 9:155–164CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Frankham R (1997) Do island populations have less genetic variation than mainland populations? Heredity 78:311–327CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Frankham R, Ballou J, Briscoe D (2002) Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge University Press, New York, p 640Google Scholar
- Girjes A, Hugall A, Timms P, Lavin M (1988) Two distinct forms of Chlamydia psittaci associated with disease and infertility in Phascolarctos cinereus (koala). Infect Immun 56(8):1897–1900PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goudet J (2001) FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3). Available from http://www.unil.ch/izea/softwares/fstat.html
- Guillot G, Mortier F, Estoup A (2005) geneland: a computer package for landscape genetics. Mol Ecol 5:712–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hazlitt SL, Goldizen AW, Eldridge MDB (2006) Significant patterns of population genetic structure and limited gene flow in a threatened macropodid marsupial despite continuous habitat in Southeast Queensland, Australia. Conserv Genet 7:675–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Houlden BA, England P, Sherwin WB (1996a) Paternity exclusion in koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) using hypervariable microsatellites. JHered 87:149–152Google Scholar
- Houlden BA, England PR, Taylor AC, Greville WD, Sherwin WB (1996b) Low genetic variability of the Koala Phascolarctos cinereus in south-eastern Australia following a severe population bottleneck. Mol Ecol 5:269–281PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Houlden BA, Costello BH, Sharkey D, Fowler EV, Melzer A, Ellis W, Carrick F, Baverstock PR, Elphinstone MS (1999) Phylogeographic differentiation in the mitochondrial control region of the Koala. Mol Ecol 8:999–1011CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- IUCN (1987) Translocation of living organisms. http://www.iucnsscrsg.org/download/IUCNPositionStatement.pdf. Accessed on 13 Jan 2009
- Lacy RC (1988) A report on population genetics in conservation. Conserv Biol 2:245–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lawson VJ, Carrick FN (1998) Morphology of the thyroid in coastal and non-coastal populations of the Koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) in Queensland. Gen Comp Endocr 110:295–306CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mantel N (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res 27:209–220PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moritz C, Geffen HE, McRae P (1997) Genetic population structure of the Greater Bilby Macrotis lagotis, a marsupial in decline. Mol Ecol 6:925–936CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nattrass AEO, Fiedler KB (1996) Koala rescue–the perception and the reality. In: Gordon G (ed) Koalas–research for management–proceedings of the Brisbane Koala symposium. World Koala Research Incorporated, Brisbane, pp 129–136Google Scholar
- Nei M (1987) Molecular evolutionary genetics. New York, Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar
- Noël S, Ouellet M, Galois P, Lapointe F (2007) Impact of urban fragmentation on the genetic structure of the eastern red-backed salamander. Conserv Genet 8:599–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Noss RF, Copperrider AY (1994) Saving nature’s legacy. Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- O’Brien SJ, Evermann JF (1988) Interactive influence of infectious disease and genetic diversity in natural populations. Trends Ecol Evol 3:254–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- O’Brien SJ, Roelke ME, Marker L et al (1985) Genetic basis for species vulnerability in the Cheetah. Science 227:1428–1434CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Peakall R, Smouse P (2006) GENALEX6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Phillips B (1990) Koalas. The little Australians we’d all hate to lose. AGPS Press, CanberraGoogle Scholar
- Preece H (2007) Monitoring and modelling threats to koala populations in rapidly urbanising landscapes: Koala Coast, South East Queensland, Australia. PhD Thesis. The University of QueenslandGoogle Scholar
- Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure from multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Queensland Government (2006) Nature conservation (Koala) conservation plan 2006 and management program 2006–2016. Queensland Environmental Protection Agency, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
- Queensland Government (2007) Report on Koala Coast Koala surveys 2005–2006. Queensland Environmental Protection Agency, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
- Queensland Government (2009) Decline of the Koala Coast Koala population: population status in 2008. Department of Environment and Resource Management, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
- Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249Google Scholar
- Schwartz MK, McKelvey KS (2009) Why sampling scheme matters: the effect of sampling scheme on landscape genetic results. Conserv Genet 10:441–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Segelbacher G, Hoglund J, Storch I (2003) From connectivity to isolation: genetic consequences of population fragmentation in Capercaillie across Europe. Mol Ecol 12:1773–1780CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sherwin WB, Timms P, Wilcken J, Houlden B (2000) Analysis and implications of koala genetics. Conserv Biol 14(3):639–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Simberloff D (1994) Habitat fragmentation and extinction by birds. Ibis 137:105–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sloss CR, Murray-Wallace CV, Jones BJ (2006) Holocene sea-level change on the southeast coast of Australia: a review. The Holocene 17(7):999–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Thompson J (2006) The comparative ecology and population dynamics of koalas in the Koala Coast region of South-East Queensland. PhD Thesis. The University of QueenslandGoogle Scholar
- Tilman D, May RM, Lehman CL, Nowak MA (1994) Habitat destruction and extinction debt. Nature 371:65–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley PF (2003) Micro-checker version 2.2.3 University of Hull. Available from http://www.microchecker.hull.ac.uk/. Accessed on 18 Oct 2007
- Vos CC, Antonisse-De Jong AG, Goedhart PW, Smulders MJM (2001) Genetic similarity as a measure for connectivity between fragmented populations of the moor frog (Rana arvalis). Heredity 86:598–608CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weigler B, Girjes A, White N et al (1988) Aspects of the epidemiology of Chlamydia psittaci infection in a population of Koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) in southeastern Queensland, Australia. J Wildlife Dis 24(2):282–291Google Scholar
- Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38(6):1358–1370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009
Personalised recommendations
(function() ;
window.SpringerLink.staticLocation = '/springerlink-static/2055516157';
window.eventTrackerInstance = null;
if (window.matchMedia && window.matchMedia(linkEl.media).matches)
(function(h)h.className = h.className.replace('no-js', 'js'))(document.documentElement);
polyfillFeatures = 'default,fetch,Promise,Object.setPrototypeOf,Object.entries,Number.isInteger,MutationObserver,startsWith,Array.prototype.includes,Array.from,IntersectionObserver';
scriptsList = [
'https://cdn.polyfill.io/v2/polyfill.min.js?features=' + polyfillFeatures + '&flags=gated',
window.SpringerLink.staticLocation + '/js/main.js'
];
scriptsList.forEach(function(script)
var tag = document.createElement('script');
tag.async = false;
tag.src = script;
document.body.appendChild(tag);
);
)();
var adSlot = '270604982/springerlink/10592/article';
var definedSlots = [
slot: [728, 90], containerName: 'doubleclick-leaderboard-ad',
slot: [160, 600], containerName: 'doubleclick-ad',
slot: [2, 2], containerName: 'doubleclick-native-ad'
];
