Using NDEigensystem to solve the Mathieu equationHow to correctly use DSolve when the force is an impulse (dirac delta) and initial conditions are not zeroFEM Solution desired for “Plate with orifice” deflection: Application of Boundary Conditions and use of RegionsFinding eigenvalues for Laplacian operator for 3D shape with Neumann boundary conditionsNDEigensystem for structural vibrationHow do you find the eigenvalues of a PDE (Dynamic Euler-Bernoulli beam)?Using NDEigensystem to solve coupled eigenvalue problemHow to use DEigensystem with periodic boundary conditions on the derivative?Defining a function that outputs a matrix, and later finding its eigenvaluesInterface points of NDEigensystemEvaluating Hough functions by using NDEigensystem on the Laplace tidal equation
As matter approaches a black hole, does it speed up?
Pressure inside an infinite ocean?
How can I support myself financially as a 17 year old with a loan?
Why was the battle set up *outside* Winterfell?
Why isn't nylon as strong as kevlar?
Would the Disguise Self spell be able to reveal hidden birthmarks/tattoos (of the person they're disguised as) to a character?
What property of a BJT transistor makes it an amplifier?
Can there be a single technologically advanced nation, in a continent full of non-technologically advanced nations?
Out of scope work duties and resignation
Should I replace my bicycle tires if they have not been inflated in multiple years
Multi-channel audio upsampling interpolation
How do I make a function that generates nth natural number that isn't a perfect square?
Expressing 'our' for objects belonging to our apartment
How to apply differences on part of a list and keep the rest
How do I overfit?
Fitch Proof Question
How should I tell my manager I'm not paying for an optional after work event I'm not going to?
I need a disease
Why is Arya visibly scared in the library in S8E3?
I have a unique character that I'm having a problem writing. He's a virus!
On which topic did Indiana Jones write his doctoral thesis?
Getting a W on your transcript for grad school applications
What matters more when it comes to book covers? Is it ‘professional quality’ or relevancy?
What was the design of the Macintosh II's MMU replacement?
Using NDEigensystem to solve the Mathieu equation
How to correctly use DSolve when the force is an impulse (dirac delta) and initial conditions are not zeroFEM Solution desired for “Plate with orifice” deflection: Application of Boundary Conditions and use of RegionsFinding eigenvalues for Laplacian operator for 3D shape with Neumann boundary conditionsNDEigensystem for structural vibrationHow do you find the eigenvalues of a PDE (Dynamic Euler-Bernoulli beam)?Using NDEigensystem to solve coupled eigenvalue problemHow to use DEigensystem with periodic boundary conditions on the derivative?Defining a function that outputs a matrix, and later finding its eigenvaluesInterface points of NDEigensystemEvaluating Hough functions by using NDEigensystem on the Laplace tidal equation
$begingroup$
To be able to apply the differential equation capabilities of Mathematica to my graduate thesis, I am trying to apply NDEigensystem to an eigenproblem whose solution I know, but I am having some trouble doing so.
As a test problem, I am using an algebraic version of the Mathieu equation,
$$(1-zeta^2)w^primeprime-zeta w^prime+left(a+2q-4qzeta^2right)w=0$$
For this example I set $q=4/3$ and take only the first three eigenpairs:
m = 3; q = 4/3;
op = -(1 - ζ^2) u''[ζ] + ζ u'[ζ] + 2 q (2 ζ^2 - 1) u[ζ];
bc = DirichletCondition[u[ζ] == 0, True];
λ, fl = NDEigensystem[op, bc, u, ζ, 0, 1, m];
I chose the Mathieu equation as a nontrivial example as Mathematica already has a function for its evaluation:
λt = Table[MathieuCharacteristicB[2 k, q], k, m];
flt = Table[With[k = k, q = q,
MathieuS[MathieuCharacteristicB[2 k, q], q, ArcCos[#]] &], k, m];
The problem is, I do not get the expected eigenvalues!
λ
(* 4.0708, 17.3259, 39.1877 *)
N[λt]
(* 3.85298, 16.0581, 36.0254 *)
And of course, plotting shows that the eigenequation is not satisfied at all:
With[u = fl[[1]], b = λ[[1]],
Plot[(1 - ζ^2) u''[ζ] - ζ u'[ζ] + (b + 2 q - 4 q ζ^2) u[ζ], ζ, 0, 1]]
With[u = flt[[1]], b = λt[[1]],
Plot[(1 - ζ^2) u''[ζ] - ζ u'[ζ] + (b + 2 q - 4 q ζ^2) u[ζ], ζ, 0, 1]]
What was wrong with my attempt? If I can get this example to work, I should be able to apply it to my actual, more complicated problem, so any good ideas would be welcome.
differential-equations finite-element-method eigenvalues
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To be able to apply the differential equation capabilities of Mathematica to my graduate thesis, I am trying to apply NDEigensystem to an eigenproblem whose solution I know, but I am having some trouble doing so.
As a test problem, I am using an algebraic version of the Mathieu equation,
$$(1-zeta^2)w^primeprime-zeta w^prime+left(a+2q-4qzeta^2right)w=0$$
For this example I set $q=4/3$ and take only the first three eigenpairs:
m = 3; q = 4/3;
op = -(1 - ζ^2) u''[ζ] + ζ u'[ζ] + 2 q (2 ζ^2 - 1) u[ζ];
bc = DirichletCondition[u[ζ] == 0, True];
λ, fl = NDEigensystem[op, bc, u, ζ, 0, 1, m];
I chose the Mathieu equation as a nontrivial example as Mathematica already has a function for its evaluation:
λt = Table[MathieuCharacteristicB[2 k, q], k, m];
flt = Table[With[k = k, q = q,
MathieuS[MathieuCharacteristicB[2 k, q], q, ArcCos[#]] &], k, m];
The problem is, I do not get the expected eigenvalues!
λ
(* 4.0708, 17.3259, 39.1877 *)
N[λt]
(* 3.85298, 16.0581, 36.0254 *)
And of course, plotting shows that the eigenequation is not satisfied at all:
With[u = fl[[1]], b = λ[[1]],
Plot[(1 - ζ^2) u''[ζ] - ζ u'[ζ] + (b + 2 q - 4 q ζ^2) u[ζ], ζ, 0, 1]]
With[u = flt[[1]], b = λt[[1]],
Plot[(1 - ζ^2) u''[ζ] - ζ u'[ζ] + (b + 2 q - 4 q ζ^2) u[ζ], ζ, 0, 1]]
What was wrong with my attempt? If I can get this example to work, I should be able to apply it to my actual, more complicated problem, so any good ideas would be welcome.
differential-equations finite-element-method eigenvalues
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
To be able to apply the differential equation capabilities of Mathematica to my graduate thesis, I am trying to apply NDEigensystem to an eigenproblem whose solution I know, but I am having some trouble doing so.
As a test problem, I am using an algebraic version of the Mathieu equation,
$$(1-zeta^2)w^primeprime-zeta w^prime+left(a+2q-4qzeta^2right)w=0$$
For this example I set $q=4/3$ and take only the first three eigenpairs:
m = 3; q = 4/3;
op = -(1 - ζ^2) u''[ζ] + ζ u'[ζ] + 2 q (2 ζ^2 - 1) u[ζ];
bc = DirichletCondition[u[ζ] == 0, True];
λ, fl = NDEigensystem[op, bc, u, ζ, 0, 1, m];
I chose the Mathieu equation as a nontrivial example as Mathematica already has a function for its evaluation:
λt = Table[MathieuCharacteristicB[2 k, q], k, m];
flt = Table[With[k = k, q = q,
MathieuS[MathieuCharacteristicB[2 k, q], q, ArcCos[#]] &], k, m];
The problem is, I do not get the expected eigenvalues!
λ
(* 4.0708, 17.3259, 39.1877 *)
N[λt]
(* 3.85298, 16.0581, 36.0254 *)
And of course, plotting shows that the eigenequation is not satisfied at all:
With[u = fl[[1]], b = λ[[1]],
Plot[(1 - ζ^2) u''[ζ] - ζ u'[ζ] + (b + 2 q - 4 q ζ^2) u[ζ], ζ, 0, 1]]
With[u = flt[[1]], b = λt[[1]],
Plot[(1 - ζ^2) u''[ζ] - ζ u'[ζ] + (b + 2 q - 4 q ζ^2) u[ζ], ζ, 0, 1]]
What was wrong with my attempt? If I can get this example to work, I should be able to apply it to my actual, more complicated problem, so any good ideas would be welcome.
differential-equations finite-element-method eigenvalues
$endgroup$
To be able to apply the differential equation capabilities of Mathematica to my graduate thesis, I am trying to apply NDEigensystem to an eigenproblem whose solution I know, but I am having some trouble doing so.
As a test problem, I am using an algebraic version of the Mathieu equation,
$$(1-zeta^2)w^primeprime-zeta w^prime+left(a+2q-4qzeta^2right)w=0$$
For this example I set $q=4/3$ and take only the first three eigenpairs:
m = 3; q = 4/3;
op = -(1 - ζ^2) u''[ζ] + ζ u'[ζ] + 2 q (2 ζ^2 - 1) u[ζ];
bc = DirichletCondition[u[ζ] == 0, True];
λ, fl = NDEigensystem[op, bc, u, ζ, 0, 1, m];
I chose the Mathieu equation as a nontrivial example as Mathematica already has a function for its evaluation:
λt = Table[MathieuCharacteristicB[2 k, q], k, m];
flt = Table[With[k = k, q = q,
MathieuS[MathieuCharacteristicB[2 k, q], q, ArcCos[#]] &], k, m];
The problem is, I do not get the expected eigenvalues!
λ
(* 4.0708, 17.3259, 39.1877 *)
N[λt]
(* 3.85298, 16.0581, 36.0254 *)
And of course, plotting shows that the eigenequation is not satisfied at all:
With[u = fl[[1]], b = λ[[1]],
Plot[(1 - ζ^2) u''[ζ] - ζ u'[ζ] + (b + 2 q - 4 q ζ^2) u[ζ], ζ, 0, 1]]
With[u = flt[[1]], b = λt[[1]],
Plot[(1 - ζ^2) u''[ζ] - ζ u'[ζ] + (b + 2 q - 4 q ζ^2) u[ζ], ζ, 0, 1]]
What was wrong with my attempt? If I can get this example to work, I should be able to apply it to my actual, more complicated problem, so any good ideas would be welcome.
differential-equations finite-element-method eigenvalues
differential-equations finite-element-method eigenvalues
edited Apr 24 at 14:53
KraZug
3,63321131
3,63321131
asked Apr 24 at 3:48
宮川園子宮川園子
311
311
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It looks to me like NDEigensystem
is struggling with the singularity at $zeta=1$, as does the method that I'm going to show. But perhaps it'll be useful for you, at least as a cross-check.
I have a package for numerically calculating solutions of eigenvalue problems using the Evans function via the method of compound matrices, which is hosted on github. See my answers to other questions, the example notebook on the github or this introduction for some more details.
First we install the package (only need to do this the first time):
Needs["PacletManager`"]
PacletInstall["CompoundMatrixMethod",
"Site" -> "http://raw.githubusercontent.com/paclets/Repository/master"]
Then we first need to turn the ODEs into a matrix form $mathbfy'=mathbfA cdot mathbfy$, using my function ToMatrixSystem
:
Needs["CompoundMatrixMethod`"]
m = 3; q = 4/3;
op = -(1 - ζ^2) u''[ζ] + ζ u'[ζ] + 2 q (2 ζ^2 - 1) u[ζ];
sys[ζend_] = ToMatrixSystem[op == a u[ζ], u[0] == 0, u[ζend] == 0, u, ζ, 0, ζend, a]
Now the function Evans will calculate the Evans function (also known as the Miss-Distance function) for any given value of $a$ and $zeta_end$; this is an analytic function whose roots coincide with eigenvalues of the original equation.
Plugging in $zeta_end = 1$ fails due to the singularity, but you can try moving the endpoint slightly away:
FindRoot[Evans[a, sys[1 - 10^-3]], a, 3]
(* a -> 4.00335 *)
Moving the endpoint closer approaches the correct value, but I can't get the exact value with this method.
aEvans = a /. FindRoot[Evans[a, sys[1 - 10^-10], WorkingPrecision -> 30], a, 3,
WorkingPrecision -> 30] // Quiet
(* a -> 3.85301 *)
My package can't get the eigenfunctions directly at the moment, but you can use this eigenvalue in NDSolve (with an arbitrary second condition at $zeta=0$, set it to be 2.45446 to make it consistent with the MathieuS):
sol = NDSolveValue[op == aEvans u[[Zeta]], u[0] == 0, u'[0] == 1,
u, [Zeta], 0, 1 - 10^-10];
Plot[sol[[Zeta]], flt[[1]][[Zeta]], [Zeta], 0, 1 - 10^-10]
The same should work for the other roots.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you refine the mesh, you will get closer:
m = 3; q = 4/3;
op = -(1 - [Zeta]^2) u''[[Zeta]] + [Zeta] u'[[Zeta]] +
2 q (2 [Zeta]^2 - 1) u[[Zeta]];
bc = DirichletCondition[u[[Zeta]] == 0, True];
[Lambda], fl =
NDEigensystem[op, bc, u, [Zeta], 0, 1, m,
Method -> "PDEDiscretization" -> "FiniteElement", "MeshOptions"
-> "MaxCellMeasure" -> 0.00001];
[Lambda]
3.855, 16.074, 36.064
[Lambda]t = Table[MathieuCharacteristicB[2 k, q], k, m];
flt = Table[
With[j = j,
MathieuS[MathieuCharacteristicB[2 k, q], q, ArcCos[#]] &], k, m];
[Lambda]t // N
3.852, 16.058, 36.025
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "387"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f196891%2fusing-ndeigensystem-to-solve-the-mathieu-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
It looks to me like NDEigensystem
is struggling with the singularity at $zeta=1$, as does the method that I'm going to show. But perhaps it'll be useful for you, at least as a cross-check.
I have a package for numerically calculating solutions of eigenvalue problems using the Evans function via the method of compound matrices, which is hosted on github. See my answers to other questions, the example notebook on the github or this introduction for some more details.
First we install the package (only need to do this the first time):
Needs["PacletManager`"]
PacletInstall["CompoundMatrixMethod",
"Site" -> "http://raw.githubusercontent.com/paclets/Repository/master"]
Then we first need to turn the ODEs into a matrix form $mathbfy'=mathbfA cdot mathbfy$, using my function ToMatrixSystem
:
Needs["CompoundMatrixMethod`"]
m = 3; q = 4/3;
op = -(1 - ζ^2) u''[ζ] + ζ u'[ζ] + 2 q (2 ζ^2 - 1) u[ζ];
sys[ζend_] = ToMatrixSystem[op == a u[ζ], u[0] == 0, u[ζend] == 0, u, ζ, 0, ζend, a]
Now the function Evans will calculate the Evans function (also known as the Miss-Distance function) for any given value of $a$ and $zeta_end$; this is an analytic function whose roots coincide with eigenvalues of the original equation.
Plugging in $zeta_end = 1$ fails due to the singularity, but you can try moving the endpoint slightly away:
FindRoot[Evans[a, sys[1 - 10^-3]], a, 3]
(* a -> 4.00335 *)
Moving the endpoint closer approaches the correct value, but I can't get the exact value with this method.
aEvans = a /. FindRoot[Evans[a, sys[1 - 10^-10], WorkingPrecision -> 30], a, 3,
WorkingPrecision -> 30] // Quiet
(* a -> 3.85301 *)
My package can't get the eigenfunctions directly at the moment, but you can use this eigenvalue in NDSolve (with an arbitrary second condition at $zeta=0$, set it to be 2.45446 to make it consistent with the MathieuS):
sol = NDSolveValue[op == aEvans u[[Zeta]], u[0] == 0, u'[0] == 1,
u, [Zeta], 0, 1 - 10^-10];
Plot[sol[[Zeta]], flt[[1]][[Zeta]], [Zeta], 0, 1 - 10^-10]
The same should work for the other roots.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It looks to me like NDEigensystem
is struggling with the singularity at $zeta=1$, as does the method that I'm going to show. But perhaps it'll be useful for you, at least as a cross-check.
I have a package for numerically calculating solutions of eigenvalue problems using the Evans function via the method of compound matrices, which is hosted on github. See my answers to other questions, the example notebook on the github or this introduction for some more details.
First we install the package (only need to do this the first time):
Needs["PacletManager`"]
PacletInstall["CompoundMatrixMethod",
"Site" -> "http://raw.githubusercontent.com/paclets/Repository/master"]
Then we first need to turn the ODEs into a matrix form $mathbfy'=mathbfA cdot mathbfy$, using my function ToMatrixSystem
:
Needs["CompoundMatrixMethod`"]
m = 3; q = 4/3;
op = -(1 - ζ^2) u''[ζ] + ζ u'[ζ] + 2 q (2 ζ^2 - 1) u[ζ];
sys[ζend_] = ToMatrixSystem[op == a u[ζ], u[0] == 0, u[ζend] == 0, u, ζ, 0, ζend, a]
Now the function Evans will calculate the Evans function (also known as the Miss-Distance function) for any given value of $a$ and $zeta_end$; this is an analytic function whose roots coincide with eigenvalues of the original equation.
Plugging in $zeta_end = 1$ fails due to the singularity, but you can try moving the endpoint slightly away:
FindRoot[Evans[a, sys[1 - 10^-3]], a, 3]
(* a -> 4.00335 *)
Moving the endpoint closer approaches the correct value, but I can't get the exact value with this method.
aEvans = a /. FindRoot[Evans[a, sys[1 - 10^-10], WorkingPrecision -> 30], a, 3,
WorkingPrecision -> 30] // Quiet
(* a -> 3.85301 *)
My package can't get the eigenfunctions directly at the moment, but you can use this eigenvalue in NDSolve (with an arbitrary second condition at $zeta=0$, set it to be 2.45446 to make it consistent with the MathieuS):
sol = NDSolveValue[op == aEvans u[[Zeta]], u[0] == 0, u'[0] == 1,
u, [Zeta], 0, 1 - 10^-10];
Plot[sol[[Zeta]], flt[[1]][[Zeta]], [Zeta], 0, 1 - 10^-10]
The same should work for the other roots.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It looks to me like NDEigensystem
is struggling with the singularity at $zeta=1$, as does the method that I'm going to show. But perhaps it'll be useful for you, at least as a cross-check.
I have a package for numerically calculating solutions of eigenvalue problems using the Evans function via the method of compound matrices, which is hosted on github. See my answers to other questions, the example notebook on the github or this introduction for some more details.
First we install the package (only need to do this the first time):
Needs["PacletManager`"]
PacletInstall["CompoundMatrixMethod",
"Site" -> "http://raw.githubusercontent.com/paclets/Repository/master"]
Then we first need to turn the ODEs into a matrix form $mathbfy'=mathbfA cdot mathbfy$, using my function ToMatrixSystem
:
Needs["CompoundMatrixMethod`"]
m = 3; q = 4/3;
op = -(1 - ζ^2) u''[ζ] + ζ u'[ζ] + 2 q (2 ζ^2 - 1) u[ζ];
sys[ζend_] = ToMatrixSystem[op == a u[ζ], u[0] == 0, u[ζend] == 0, u, ζ, 0, ζend, a]
Now the function Evans will calculate the Evans function (also known as the Miss-Distance function) for any given value of $a$ and $zeta_end$; this is an analytic function whose roots coincide with eigenvalues of the original equation.
Plugging in $zeta_end = 1$ fails due to the singularity, but you can try moving the endpoint slightly away:
FindRoot[Evans[a, sys[1 - 10^-3]], a, 3]
(* a -> 4.00335 *)
Moving the endpoint closer approaches the correct value, but I can't get the exact value with this method.
aEvans = a /. FindRoot[Evans[a, sys[1 - 10^-10], WorkingPrecision -> 30], a, 3,
WorkingPrecision -> 30] // Quiet
(* a -> 3.85301 *)
My package can't get the eigenfunctions directly at the moment, but you can use this eigenvalue in NDSolve (with an arbitrary second condition at $zeta=0$, set it to be 2.45446 to make it consistent with the MathieuS):
sol = NDSolveValue[op == aEvans u[[Zeta]], u[0] == 0, u'[0] == 1,
u, [Zeta], 0, 1 - 10^-10];
Plot[sol[[Zeta]], flt[[1]][[Zeta]], [Zeta], 0, 1 - 10^-10]
The same should work for the other roots.
$endgroup$
It looks to me like NDEigensystem
is struggling with the singularity at $zeta=1$, as does the method that I'm going to show. But perhaps it'll be useful for you, at least as a cross-check.
I have a package for numerically calculating solutions of eigenvalue problems using the Evans function via the method of compound matrices, which is hosted on github. See my answers to other questions, the example notebook on the github or this introduction for some more details.
First we install the package (only need to do this the first time):
Needs["PacletManager`"]
PacletInstall["CompoundMatrixMethod",
"Site" -> "http://raw.githubusercontent.com/paclets/Repository/master"]
Then we first need to turn the ODEs into a matrix form $mathbfy'=mathbfA cdot mathbfy$, using my function ToMatrixSystem
:
Needs["CompoundMatrixMethod`"]
m = 3; q = 4/3;
op = -(1 - ζ^2) u''[ζ] + ζ u'[ζ] + 2 q (2 ζ^2 - 1) u[ζ];
sys[ζend_] = ToMatrixSystem[op == a u[ζ], u[0] == 0, u[ζend] == 0, u, ζ, 0, ζend, a]
Now the function Evans will calculate the Evans function (also known as the Miss-Distance function) for any given value of $a$ and $zeta_end$; this is an analytic function whose roots coincide with eigenvalues of the original equation.
Plugging in $zeta_end = 1$ fails due to the singularity, but you can try moving the endpoint slightly away:
FindRoot[Evans[a, sys[1 - 10^-3]], a, 3]
(* a -> 4.00335 *)
Moving the endpoint closer approaches the correct value, but I can't get the exact value with this method.
aEvans = a /. FindRoot[Evans[a, sys[1 - 10^-10], WorkingPrecision -> 30], a, 3,
WorkingPrecision -> 30] // Quiet
(* a -> 3.85301 *)
My package can't get the eigenfunctions directly at the moment, but you can use this eigenvalue in NDSolve (with an arbitrary second condition at $zeta=0$, set it to be 2.45446 to make it consistent with the MathieuS):
sol = NDSolveValue[op == aEvans u[[Zeta]], u[0] == 0, u'[0] == 1,
u, [Zeta], 0, 1 - 10^-10];
Plot[sol[[Zeta]], flt[[1]][[Zeta]], [Zeta], 0, 1 - 10^-10]
The same should work for the other roots.
edited Apr 24 at 13:54
answered Apr 24 at 5:40
KraZugKraZug
3,63321131
3,63321131
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you refine the mesh, you will get closer:
m = 3; q = 4/3;
op = -(1 - [Zeta]^2) u''[[Zeta]] + [Zeta] u'[[Zeta]] +
2 q (2 [Zeta]^2 - 1) u[[Zeta]];
bc = DirichletCondition[u[[Zeta]] == 0, True];
[Lambda], fl =
NDEigensystem[op, bc, u, [Zeta], 0, 1, m,
Method -> "PDEDiscretization" -> "FiniteElement", "MeshOptions"
-> "MaxCellMeasure" -> 0.00001];
[Lambda]
3.855, 16.074, 36.064
[Lambda]t = Table[MathieuCharacteristicB[2 k, q], k, m];
flt = Table[
With[j = j,
MathieuS[MathieuCharacteristicB[2 k, q], q, ArcCos[#]] &], k, m];
[Lambda]t // N
3.852, 16.058, 36.025
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you refine the mesh, you will get closer:
m = 3; q = 4/3;
op = -(1 - [Zeta]^2) u''[[Zeta]] + [Zeta] u'[[Zeta]] +
2 q (2 [Zeta]^2 - 1) u[[Zeta]];
bc = DirichletCondition[u[[Zeta]] == 0, True];
[Lambda], fl =
NDEigensystem[op, bc, u, [Zeta], 0, 1, m,
Method -> "PDEDiscretization" -> "FiniteElement", "MeshOptions"
-> "MaxCellMeasure" -> 0.00001];
[Lambda]
3.855, 16.074, 36.064
[Lambda]t = Table[MathieuCharacteristicB[2 k, q], k, m];
flt = Table[
With[j = j,
MathieuS[MathieuCharacteristicB[2 k, q], q, ArcCos[#]] &], k, m];
[Lambda]t // N
3.852, 16.058, 36.025
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you refine the mesh, you will get closer:
m = 3; q = 4/3;
op = -(1 - [Zeta]^2) u''[[Zeta]] + [Zeta] u'[[Zeta]] +
2 q (2 [Zeta]^2 - 1) u[[Zeta]];
bc = DirichletCondition[u[[Zeta]] == 0, True];
[Lambda], fl =
NDEigensystem[op, bc, u, [Zeta], 0, 1, m,
Method -> "PDEDiscretization" -> "FiniteElement", "MeshOptions"
-> "MaxCellMeasure" -> 0.00001];
[Lambda]
3.855, 16.074, 36.064
[Lambda]t = Table[MathieuCharacteristicB[2 k, q], k, m];
flt = Table[
With[j = j,
MathieuS[MathieuCharacteristicB[2 k, q], q, ArcCos[#]] &], k, m];
[Lambda]t // N
3.852, 16.058, 36.025
$endgroup$
If you refine the mesh, you will get closer:
m = 3; q = 4/3;
op = -(1 - [Zeta]^2) u''[[Zeta]] + [Zeta] u'[[Zeta]] +
2 q (2 [Zeta]^2 - 1) u[[Zeta]];
bc = DirichletCondition[u[[Zeta]] == 0, True];
[Lambda], fl =
NDEigensystem[op, bc, u, [Zeta], 0, 1, m,
Method -> "PDEDiscretization" -> "FiniteElement", "MeshOptions"
-> "MaxCellMeasure" -> 0.00001];
[Lambda]
3.855, 16.074, 36.064
[Lambda]t = Table[MathieuCharacteristicB[2 k, q], k, m];
flt = Table[
With[j = j,
MathieuS[MathieuCharacteristicB[2 k, q], q, ArcCos[#]] &], k, m];
[Lambda]t // N
3.852, 16.058, 36.025
answered Apr 24 at 5:22
user21user21
21.4k561101
21.4k561101
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f196891%2fusing-ndeigensystem-to-solve-the-mathieu-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown