Choice of non-standard ephemeral portsRecommendation for a non-standard SSL portCan Apache serve proxy requests for websites on non-standard ports?On Linux, how can I tell how many ephemeral ports are left available?Hiding non-standard ports in the address bar?SSL over non-standard port?Securing phpmyadmin: non-standard port + httpsSOHO Routers and Non-Standard CIDR BlocksUnsure about IIS usage of ephemeral portswhy linux assigns ephemeral ports out of its rangeA good reason why docker containers shouldn't use standard ports?nginx won't listen on non-standard port
Could there be a material that inverts the colours seen through it?
Tikz draw contour without some edges, and fill
Entering the UK as a British citizen who is a Canadian permanent resident
Do I need to say 'o`clock'?
Is it possible to create different colors in rocket exhaust?
Jumping frame contents with beamer and pgfplots
Was this character’s old age look CGI or make-up?
Is there any good reason to write "it is easy to see"?
CPLD based Pierce oscillator
High Memory Utilization in Juniper ACX2100
What's the difference between "за ... от" and "в ... от"?
Will a coyote attack my dog on a leash while I'm on a hiking trail?
Are there any established rules for splitting books into parts, chapters, sections etc?
How does emacs `shell-mode` know to prompt for sudo?
On what legal basis did the UK remove the 'European Union' from its passport?
Is this apt vulnerability (CVE-2019-3462) a security concern for Ubuntu users?
return tuple of uncopyable objects
Ito`s Lemma problem
What are the implications of the new alleged key recovery attack preprint on SIMON?
Determine the slope and write the Cartesian equation of the line.
How do I tell my supervisor that he is choosing poor replacements for me while I am on maternity leave?
Does gravity affect the time evolution of a QM wave function?
51% attack - apparently very easy? refering to CZ's "rollback btc chain" - How to make sure such corruptible scenario can never happen so easily?
Wireless headphones interfere with Wi-Fi signal on laptop
Choice of non-standard ephemeral ports
Recommendation for a non-standard SSL portCan Apache serve proxy requests for websites on non-standard ports?On Linux, how can I tell how many ephemeral ports are left available?Hiding non-standard ports in the address bar?SSL over non-standard port?Securing phpmyadmin: non-standard port + httpsSOHO Routers and Non-Standard CIDR BlocksUnsure about IIS usage of ephemeral portswhy linux assigns ephemeral ports out of its rangeA good reason why docker containers shouldn't use standard ports?nginx won't listen on non-standard port
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
This is somewhat related to - but different from - Recommendation for a non-standard SSL port .
One answer there suggests that binding to 8443 is a valid example of an alternate HTTPS socket configuration. However, under some Windows systems, 8443 falls within the ephemeral port range.
My questions are:
- Are there any risks associated with binding a service - such as sshd or httpd - to listen to a port in the ephemeral range?
- Could it interfere with the creation of outgoing sockets? In particular, will a listening socket and a connecting socket on the same address with the same port interfere, collide, or otherwise fail?
- Is it expected in such a case that a client request a new ephemeral port until it finds one that is available?
ip port
add a comment |
This is somewhat related to - but different from - Recommendation for a non-standard SSL port .
One answer there suggests that binding to 8443 is a valid example of an alternate HTTPS socket configuration. However, under some Windows systems, 8443 falls within the ephemeral port range.
My questions are:
- Are there any risks associated with binding a service - such as sshd or httpd - to listen to a port in the ephemeral range?
- Could it interfere with the creation of outgoing sockets? In particular, will a listening socket and a connecting socket on the same address with the same port interfere, collide, or otherwise fail?
- Is it expected in such a case that a client request a new ephemeral port until it finds one that is available?
ip port
Other than all mentioned products being EOL, i suppose there shouldn't be a problem. Or just reconfigure the EPR on the systems. (or use modern OS/software, which ususally has an EPR of49152 to 65535
)
– Lenniey
May 3 at 8:24
add a comment |
This is somewhat related to - but different from - Recommendation for a non-standard SSL port .
One answer there suggests that binding to 8443 is a valid example of an alternate HTTPS socket configuration. However, under some Windows systems, 8443 falls within the ephemeral port range.
My questions are:
- Are there any risks associated with binding a service - such as sshd or httpd - to listen to a port in the ephemeral range?
- Could it interfere with the creation of outgoing sockets? In particular, will a listening socket and a connecting socket on the same address with the same port interfere, collide, or otherwise fail?
- Is it expected in such a case that a client request a new ephemeral port until it finds one that is available?
ip port
This is somewhat related to - but different from - Recommendation for a non-standard SSL port .
One answer there suggests that binding to 8443 is a valid example of an alternate HTTPS socket configuration. However, under some Windows systems, 8443 falls within the ephemeral port range.
My questions are:
- Are there any risks associated with binding a service - such as sshd or httpd - to listen to a port in the ephemeral range?
- Could it interfere with the creation of outgoing sockets? In particular, will a listening socket and a connecting socket on the same address with the same port interfere, collide, or otherwise fail?
- Is it expected in such a case that a client request a new ephemeral port until it finds one that is available?
ip port
ip port
asked May 2 at 22:30
ReinderienReinderien
128110
128110
Other than all mentioned products being EOL, i suppose there shouldn't be a problem. Or just reconfigure the EPR on the systems. (or use modern OS/software, which ususally has an EPR of49152 to 65535
)
– Lenniey
May 3 at 8:24
add a comment |
Other than all mentioned products being EOL, i suppose there shouldn't be a problem. Or just reconfigure the EPR on the systems. (or use modern OS/software, which ususally has an EPR of49152 to 65535
)
– Lenniey
May 3 at 8:24
Other than all mentioned products being EOL, i suppose there shouldn't be a problem. Or just reconfigure the EPR on the systems. (or use modern OS/software, which ususally has an EPR of
49152 to 65535
)– Lenniey
May 3 at 8:24
Other than all mentioned products being EOL, i suppose there shouldn't be a problem. Or just reconfigure the EPR on the systems. (or use modern OS/software, which ususally has an EPR of
49152 to 65535
)– Lenniey
May 3 at 8:24
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "2"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f965658%2fchoice-of-non-standard-ephemeral-ports%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f965658%2fchoice-of-non-standard-ephemeral-ports%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Other than all mentioned products being EOL, i suppose there shouldn't be a problem. Or just reconfigure the EPR on the systems. (or use modern OS/software, which ususally has an EPR of
49152 to 65535
)– Lenniey
May 3 at 8:24