Why does sound not move through a wall? [duplicate]Why is sound reflected and not transmitted through a wall?Keeping air in a giant gravitationally-bound space balloonSound waves through a glass filled with liquidHow does sound travel in space?Accelerating faster per second than the speed of sound?The Doppler effect in a medium like air (sound) versus the electromagnetic Doppler effectThe Mysterious Reverb in a Jar of Hair GelWhy doesn't amplitude affect the speed of sound?The logarithmic decay of WIFIWhy does sound absorption in oceans depend on the pH?What prevents sound to be just wind?

Labeling matrices/rectangles and drawing Sigma inside rectangle

Non-deterministic Finite Automata | Sipser Example 1.16

How can dragons propel their breath attacks to a long distance

Anabelian geometry ~ higher category theory

Is there any good reason to write "it is easy to see"?

Will a coyote attack my dog on a leash while I'm on a hiking trail?

Entering the UK as a British citizen who is a Canadian permanent resident

Why would a switch ever send an ARP request for a MAC address when it can just wait for the first packet to be received from a device?

Conditional probability - sum of dice is even given that at least one is a five

Why was Endgame Thanos so different than Infinity War Thanos?

Why does the headset man not get on the tractor?

Is the expression "To think you would stoop so low" often misused?

Why was Thor doubtful about his worthiness to Mjolnir?

Can I say that master can only initiate communication in SPI vs. in I2C slave can also initiate the communication?

Jumping frame contents with beamer and pgfplots

Ito`s Lemma problem

Tikzpicture in figure problem

Area under the curve - Integrals (Antiderivatives)

How to distinguish PICTURE OF ME and PICTURE OF MINE in Chinese?

If the square of a time series is stationary, is the original time series stationary?

On studying Computer Science vs. Software Engineering to become a proficient coder

Automatically anti-predictably assemble an alliterative aria

Why do I get two different answers when solving for arclength?

Formal Definition of Dot Product



Why does sound not move through a wall? [duplicate]


Why is sound reflected and not transmitted through a wall?Keeping air in a giant gravitationally-bound space balloonSound waves through a glass filled with liquidHow does sound travel in space?Accelerating faster per second than the speed of sound?The Doppler effect in a medium like air (sound) versus the electromagnetic Doppler effectThe Mysterious Reverb in a Jar of Hair GelWhy doesn't amplitude affect the speed of sound?The logarithmic decay of WIFIWhy does sound absorption in oceans depend on the pH?What prevents sound to be just wind?













16












$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:



  • Why is sound reflected and not transmitted through a wall?

    3 answers



I'm learning a bit about sound and was wondering:



If the speed of sound is determined by the amount of matter the source is surrounded with, why doesn't it go through a wall?



Example:



Speed of sound in air is 343 m/s but in water, it moves at 1500 m/s because of the increase of matter surrounding it. And since iron has more tightly packed matter, it moves even faster because it's moving the matter to move the vibrations.



If this is true, why doesn't the sound go through walls? Is it because it loses its "strength" for the amount it travels?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



marked as duplicate by John Rennie, Jon Custer, GiorgioP, M. Enns, Rory Alsop May 5 at 16:17


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.













  • 3




    $begingroup$
    It doesn't? Lucky you...
    $endgroup$
    – Sean
    May 4 at 22:10










  • $begingroup$
    I once spent a few days in a student apartment in Spain with a young couple living in the apartment next door, let me emphasise that sound definitely goes through walls.
    $endgroup$
    – Tom
    May 5 at 0:11










  • $begingroup$
    @Tom - No experience with Spain, but I have been to China, at something similar to what you're describing, and boy oh boy, you could hear in the middle of the night things that would not be appropriate to discuss on this forum. Not to mention, conversations in the hallway, even with doors closed, way down in the elevator lobby, well enough to make out every single word.
    $endgroup$
    – The_Sympathizer
    May 5 at 1:18
















16












$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:



  • Why is sound reflected and not transmitted through a wall?

    3 answers



I'm learning a bit about sound and was wondering:



If the speed of sound is determined by the amount of matter the source is surrounded with, why doesn't it go through a wall?



Example:



Speed of sound in air is 343 m/s but in water, it moves at 1500 m/s because of the increase of matter surrounding it. And since iron has more tightly packed matter, it moves even faster because it's moving the matter to move the vibrations.



If this is true, why doesn't the sound go through walls? Is it because it loses its "strength" for the amount it travels?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



marked as duplicate by John Rennie, Jon Custer, GiorgioP, M. Enns, Rory Alsop May 5 at 16:17


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.













  • 3




    $begingroup$
    It doesn't? Lucky you...
    $endgroup$
    – Sean
    May 4 at 22:10










  • $begingroup$
    I once spent a few days in a student apartment in Spain with a young couple living in the apartment next door, let me emphasise that sound definitely goes through walls.
    $endgroup$
    – Tom
    May 5 at 0:11










  • $begingroup$
    @Tom - No experience with Spain, but I have been to China, at something similar to what you're describing, and boy oh boy, you could hear in the middle of the night things that would not be appropriate to discuss on this forum. Not to mention, conversations in the hallway, even with doors closed, way down in the elevator lobby, well enough to make out every single word.
    $endgroup$
    – The_Sympathizer
    May 5 at 1:18














16












16








16


6



$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:



  • Why is sound reflected and not transmitted through a wall?

    3 answers



I'm learning a bit about sound and was wondering:



If the speed of sound is determined by the amount of matter the source is surrounded with, why doesn't it go through a wall?



Example:



Speed of sound in air is 343 m/s but in water, it moves at 1500 m/s because of the increase of matter surrounding it. And since iron has more tightly packed matter, it moves even faster because it's moving the matter to move the vibrations.



If this is true, why doesn't the sound go through walls? Is it because it loses its "strength" for the amount it travels?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





This question already has an answer here:



  • Why is sound reflected and not transmitted through a wall?

    3 answers



I'm learning a bit about sound and was wondering:



If the speed of sound is determined by the amount of matter the source is surrounded with, why doesn't it go through a wall?



Example:



Speed of sound in air is 343 m/s but in water, it moves at 1500 m/s because of the increase of matter surrounding it. And since iron has more tightly packed matter, it moves even faster because it's moving the matter to move the vibrations.



If this is true, why doesn't the sound go through walls? Is it because it loses its "strength" for the amount it travels?





This question already has an answer here:



  • Why is sound reflected and not transmitted through a wall?

    3 answers







waves pressure acoustics density






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited May 3 at 13:57









Rishi

3,69572442




3,69572442










asked May 2 at 14:56









HeeysamHHeeysamH

31928




31928




marked as duplicate by John Rennie, Jon Custer, GiorgioP, M. Enns, Rory Alsop May 5 at 16:17


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









marked as duplicate by John Rennie, Jon Custer, GiorgioP, M. Enns, Rory Alsop May 5 at 16:17


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









  • 3




    $begingroup$
    It doesn't? Lucky you...
    $endgroup$
    – Sean
    May 4 at 22:10










  • $begingroup$
    I once spent a few days in a student apartment in Spain with a young couple living in the apartment next door, let me emphasise that sound definitely goes through walls.
    $endgroup$
    – Tom
    May 5 at 0:11










  • $begingroup$
    @Tom - No experience with Spain, but I have been to China, at something similar to what you're describing, and boy oh boy, you could hear in the middle of the night things that would not be appropriate to discuss on this forum. Not to mention, conversations in the hallway, even with doors closed, way down in the elevator lobby, well enough to make out every single word.
    $endgroup$
    – The_Sympathizer
    May 5 at 1:18













  • 3




    $begingroup$
    It doesn't? Lucky you...
    $endgroup$
    – Sean
    May 4 at 22:10










  • $begingroup$
    I once spent a few days in a student apartment in Spain with a young couple living in the apartment next door, let me emphasise that sound definitely goes through walls.
    $endgroup$
    – Tom
    May 5 at 0:11










  • $begingroup$
    @Tom - No experience with Spain, but I have been to China, at something similar to what you're describing, and boy oh boy, you could hear in the middle of the night things that would not be appropriate to discuss on this forum. Not to mention, conversations in the hallway, even with doors closed, way down in the elevator lobby, well enough to make out every single word.
    $endgroup$
    – The_Sympathizer
    May 5 at 1:18








3




3




$begingroup$
It doesn't? Lucky you...
$endgroup$
– Sean
May 4 at 22:10




$begingroup$
It doesn't? Lucky you...
$endgroup$
– Sean
May 4 at 22:10












$begingroup$
I once spent a few days in a student apartment in Spain with a young couple living in the apartment next door, let me emphasise that sound definitely goes through walls.
$endgroup$
– Tom
May 5 at 0:11




$begingroup$
I once spent a few days in a student apartment in Spain with a young couple living in the apartment next door, let me emphasise that sound definitely goes through walls.
$endgroup$
– Tom
May 5 at 0:11












$begingroup$
@Tom - No experience with Spain, but I have been to China, at something similar to what you're describing, and boy oh boy, you could hear in the middle of the night things that would not be appropriate to discuss on this forum. Not to mention, conversations in the hallway, even with doors closed, way down in the elevator lobby, well enough to make out every single word.
$endgroup$
– The_Sympathizer
May 5 at 1:18





$begingroup$
@Tom - No experience with Spain, but I have been to China, at something similar to what you're describing, and boy oh boy, you could hear in the middle of the night things that would not be appropriate to discuss on this forum. Not to mention, conversations in the hallway, even with doors closed, way down in the elevator lobby, well enough to make out every single word.
$endgroup$
– The_Sympathizer
May 5 at 1:18











3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















82












$begingroup$

Sound doesn't go through walls? Please tell my neighbor.



In electromagnetism, a medium has a property called an "impedance" which is related to the index of refraction and the speed of waves in the medium. At an interface between two media, the relative impedances determine how much of an incoming wave is transmitted or reflected, so that the entire power of the incoming wave goes somewhere. At an "impedance-matched" interface the reflection coefficient goes to zero. In signal cables and waveguides for electromagnetic waves this leads to people adding "terminating resistors" in various places, so that an incoming signal doesn't get reflected back from a cable junction. Conversely, at a junction with an impedance mis-match, the reflection coefficient is generally nonzero and not all of the power is transmitted.



You can do the same sort of analysis for sound waves moving from one medium to another. The reflection and transmission coefficients can depend on the frequency of the wave, as well, which is why my neighbor complains when I have my music turned up too loud: they can hear the low-frequency bass sounds just fine through the wall, but the high-frequency components (that they'd need to follow the lyrics) don't reach them.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 9




    $begingroup$
    +1 for both a good answer and for "...which is why my neighbor complains when I have my music turned up too loud... [they can't] follow the lyrics." I don't recall laughing out loud while reading on this SE before.
    $endgroup$
    – J. Chris Compton
    May 3 at 13:23






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    Suggested solution: Play more Barry White and Leonard Cohen
    $endgroup$
    – Dancrumb
    May 3 at 15:47






  • 7




    $begingroup$
    @Dancrumb Those singers do have low-frequency fundamental pitches, but you still need the upper harmonics to distinguish among vowels and among consonants.
    $endgroup$
    – rob
    May 3 at 17:33


















13












$begingroup$

Sound waves are just pressure oscillations; when they strike a surface they are either reflected, transmitted, or absorbed. When they're transmitted, you'll hear them on the other side.



According to Wikipedia, regarding acoustic absorption:




Deformation causes mechanical losses via conversion of part of the sound energy into heat, resulting in acoustic attenuation, mostly due to the wall's viscosity.



The fraction of sound absorbed is governed by the acoustic impedances of both media and is a function of frequency and the incident angle.



In general, soft, pliable, or porous materials (like cloths) serve as good acoustic insulators - absorbing most sound, whereas dense, hard, impenetrable materials (such as metals) reflect most.




So, walls will reflect the sound waves, as well as absorb them. The effectiveness of this depends on the material properties of the wall, as well as the frequency of the sound (low frequencies travel much easier through plywood, for instance).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    12












    $begingroup$

    It does.



    There's an important concept in soundproofing called flanking noise. There are various sources, but the most common is having sound transmitted through some kind of solid structure (walls, roof struts, door and window frames, etc.) into the soundproofed area. This is a major problem for soundproofing, and it's one of the hardest problems to solve because it's hard to completely isolate a room from its surroundings.



    It also leads to interesting problems in multiple-occupancy buildings. A friend of mine used to live in a row of new-build terraced houses which had been constructed with continuous supporting girders running between houses (instead of having solid "bulkhead" walls between them, as usual for older terraced houses). The result was that a noisy neighbour at the opposite end of the row could still be heard clearly in my friend's house. Many flats have similar problems, with sound transmitted through the concrete structure. Any dense, rigid material transmits sound reasonably effectively.



    Although these dense, rigid materials are good at transmitting sound along themselves from one end to the other, they're not so good at broadcasting the sound in air. For us to hear it, either we have to be close to or touching the structure itself, or the structure has to cause the air to vibrate. A flat brick wall isn't very good at vibrating, although of course it will do to some extent However, attach plasterboard (rockwall) to that wall and your plasterboard becomes a "sounding board" in the same way as the top of a guitar. Your bed frame can do the same, which is why you can hear building-transmitted sounds more clearly when lying in bed.



    If you want to stop this happening, it's fairly achievable. The flat brick wall isn't great at putting energy into the air. If your plasterboard wall is not physically connected to the brick wall it's in front of, the sound has to be transmitted into the air in the gap between, into the plasterboard, and back into the air on the other side. Each step is inefficient, so you end up with a quieter room.



    Don't forget the flanking noise though. Whilst you've stopped sound coming through the wall, sound also goes up the wall to the ceiling and down the wall to the floor - and your plasterboard wall inside has to be fixed to something, right? So the sound gets in that way instead. Not so much, but still plenty enough to be significant.



    A properly acoustically-isolated room therefore doesn't attach to anything. The isolated room is constructed as an isolated box, with no connections to the outside on the walls or ceiling. There are separate inner-room and outer-room doors with a vestibule between, so sound can't get through the door frames. And on the floor, the box sits on some kind of sprung supports (neoprene rubber for cheaper, smaller builds, or car springs for large professional installations) which transmit as little sound from the outer-room floor to the inner-room floor as possible.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I like this answer much better than the one I wrote.
      $endgroup$
      – rob
      May 3 at 17:39






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      "A properly acoustically-isolated room therefore doesn't attach to anything." That doesn't seem possible. The room has to connect to the house frame somehow, right?
      $endgroup$
      – Jim Clay
      May 3 at 19:20






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @JimClay Nope, that's the point. It's called "room within a room", so the inner room touches the rest of the house as little as possible. Floor and that's it, if it's done properly. And like I said, a serious job will isolate the floor as well.
      $endgroup$
      – Graham
      May 3 at 20:41






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @JimClay An extreme example of vibration isolation: a floating table in a floating room, for neutron interferometry. That system has active vibration cancellation, if I recall correctly, but passive floating tables are common in optics labs.
      $endgroup$
      – rob
      May 3 at 22:17






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      A Victorian book I have talks of good building practice using two separate set of joists between floors - one for the upstairs floor, a second set(mounted slightly lower) for the downstairs ceiling, to reduce sound transmission.
      $endgroup$
      – Brian Drummond
      May 4 at 20:24

















    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    82












    $begingroup$

    Sound doesn't go through walls? Please tell my neighbor.



    In electromagnetism, a medium has a property called an "impedance" which is related to the index of refraction and the speed of waves in the medium. At an interface between two media, the relative impedances determine how much of an incoming wave is transmitted or reflected, so that the entire power of the incoming wave goes somewhere. At an "impedance-matched" interface the reflection coefficient goes to zero. In signal cables and waveguides for electromagnetic waves this leads to people adding "terminating resistors" in various places, so that an incoming signal doesn't get reflected back from a cable junction. Conversely, at a junction with an impedance mis-match, the reflection coefficient is generally nonzero and not all of the power is transmitted.



    You can do the same sort of analysis for sound waves moving from one medium to another. The reflection and transmission coefficients can depend on the frequency of the wave, as well, which is why my neighbor complains when I have my music turned up too loud: they can hear the low-frequency bass sounds just fine through the wall, but the high-frequency components (that they'd need to follow the lyrics) don't reach them.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 9




      $begingroup$
      +1 for both a good answer and for "...which is why my neighbor complains when I have my music turned up too loud... [they can't] follow the lyrics." I don't recall laughing out loud while reading on this SE before.
      $endgroup$
      – J. Chris Compton
      May 3 at 13:23






    • 6




      $begingroup$
      Suggested solution: Play more Barry White and Leonard Cohen
      $endgroup$
      – Dancrumb
      May 3 at 15:47






    • 7




      $begingroup$
      @Dancrumb Those singers do have low-frequency fundamental pitches, but you still need the upper harmonics to distinguish among vowels and among consonants.
      $endgroup$
      – rob
      May 3 at 17:33















    82












    $begingroup$

    Sound doesn't go through walls? Please tell my neighbor.



    In electromagnetism, a medium has a property called an "impedance" which is related to the index of refraction and the speed of waves in the medium. At an interface between two media, the relative impedances determine how much of an incoming wave is transmitted or reflected, so that the entire power of the incoming wave goes somewhere. At an "impedance-matched" interface the reflection coefficient goes to zero. In signal cables and waveguides for electromagnetic waves this leads to people adding "terminating resistors" in various places, so that an incoming signal doesn't get reflected back from a cable junction. Conversely, at a junction with an impedance mis-match, the reflection coefficient is generally nonzero and not all of the power is transmitted.



    You can do the same sort of analysis for sound waves moving from one medium to another. The reflection and transmission coefficients can depend on the frequency of the wave, as well, which is why my neighbor complains when I have my music turned up too loud: they can hear the low-frequency bass sounds just fine through the wall, but the high-frequency components (that they'd need to follow the lyrics) don't reach them.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 9




      $begingroup$
      +1 for both a good answer and for "...which is why my neighbor complains when I have my music turned up too loud... [they can't] follow the lyrics." I don't recall laughing out loud while reading on this SE before.
      $endgroup$
      – J. Chris Compton
      May 3 at 13:23






    • 6




      $begingroup$
      Suggested solution: Play more Barry White and Leonard Cohen
      $endgroup$
      – Dancrumb
      May 3 at 15:47






    • 7




      $begingroup$
      @Dancrumb Those singers do have low-frequency fundamental pitches, but you still need the upper harmonics to distinguish among vowels and among consonants.
      $endgroup$
      – rob
      May 3 at 17:33













    82












    82








    82





    $begingroup$

    Sound doesn't go through walls? Please tell my neighbor.



    In electromagnetism, a medium has a property called an "impedance" which is related to the index of refraction and the speed of waves in the medium. At an interface between two media, the relative impedances determine how much of an incoming wave is transmitted or reflected, so that the entire power of the incoming wave goes somewhere. At an "impedance-matched" interface the reflection coefficient goes to zero. In signal cables and waveguides for electromagnetic waves this leads to people adding "terminating resistors" in various places, so that an incoming signal doesn't get reflected back from a cable junction. Conversely, at a junction with an impedance mis-match, the reflection coefficient is generally nonzero and not all of the power is transmitted.



    You can do the same sort of analysis for sound waves moving from one medium to another. The reflection and transmission coefficients can depend on the frequency of the wave, as well, which is why my neighbor complains when I have my music turned up too loud: they can hear the low-frequency bass sounds just fine through the wall, but the high-frequency components (that they'd need to follow the lyrics) don't reach them.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Sound doesn't go through walls? Please tell my neighbor.



    In electromagnetism, a medium has a property called an "impedance" which is related to the index of refraction and the speed of waves in the medium. At an interface between two media, the relative impedances determine how much of an incoming wave is transmitted or reflected, so that the entire power of the incoming wave goes somewhere. At an "impedance-matched" interface the reflection coefficient goes to zero. In signal cables and waveguides for electromagnetic waves this leads to people adding "terminating resistors" in various places, so that an incoming signal doesn't get reflected back from a cable junction. Conversely, at a junction with an impedance mis-match, the reflection coefficient is generally nonzero and not all of the power is transmitted.



    You can do the same sort of analysis for sound waves moving from one medium to another. The reflection and transmission coefficients can depend on the frequency of the wave, as well, which is why my neighbor complains when I have my music turned up too loud: they can hear the low-frequency bass sounds just fine through the wall, but the high-frequency components (that they'd need to follow the lyrics) don't reach them.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited May 2 at 22:11

























    answered May 2 at 15:23









    robrob

    42.5k1080175




    42.5k1080175







    • 9




      $begingroup$
      +1 for both a good answer and for "...which is why my neighbor complains when I have my music turned up too loud... [they can't] follow the lyrics." I don't recall laughing out loud while reading on this SE before.
      $endgroup$
      – J. Chris Compton
      May 3 at 13:23






    • 6




      $begingroup$
      Suggested solution: Play more Barry White and Leonard Cohen
      $endgroup$
      – Dancrumb
      May 3 at 15:47






    • 7




      $begingroup$
      @Dancrumb Those singers do have low-frequency fundamental pitches, but you still need the upper harmonics to distinguish among vowels and among consonants.
      $endgroup$
      – rob
      May 3 at 17:33












    • 9




      $begingroup$
      +1 for both a good answer and for "...which is why my neighbor complains when I have my music turned up too loud... [they can't] follow the lyrics." I don't recall laughing out loud while reading on this SE before.
      $endgroup$
      – J. Chris Compton
      May 3 at 13:23






    • 6




      $begingroup$
      Suggested solution: Play more Barry White and Leonard Cohen
      $endgroup$
      – Dancrumb
      May 3 at 15:47






    • 7




      $begingroup$
      @Dancrumb Those singers do have low-frequency fundamental pitches, but you still need the upper harmonics to distinguish among vowels and among consonants.
      $endgroup$
      – rob
      May 3 at 17:33







    9




    9




    $begingroup$
    +1 for both a good answer and for "...which is why my neighbor complains when I have my music turned up too loud... [they can't] follow the lyrics." I don't recall laughing out loud while reading on this SE before.
    $endgroup$
    – J. Chris Compton
    May 3 at 13:23




    $begingroup$
    +1 for both a good answer and for "...which is why my neighbor complains when I have my music turned up too loud... [they can't] follow the lyrics." I don't recall laughing out loud while reading on this SE before.
    $endgroup$
    – J. Chris Compton
    May 3 at 13:23




    6




    6




    $begingroup$
    Suggested solution: Play more Barry White and Leonard Cohen
    $endgroup$
    – Dancrumb
    May 3 at 15:47




    $begingroup$
    Suggested solution: Play more Barry White and Leonard Cohen
    $endgroup$
    – Dancrumb
    May 3 at 15:47




    7




    7




    $begingroup$
    @Dancrumb Those singers do have low-frequency fundamental pitches, but you still need the upper harmonics to distinguish among vowels and among consonants.
    $endgroup$
    – rob
    May 3 at 17:33




    $begingroup$
    @Dancrumb Those singers do have low-frequency fundamental pitches, but you still need the upper harmonics to distinguish among vowels and among consonants.
    $endgroup$
    – rob
    May 3 at 17:33











    13












    $begingroup$

    Sound waves are just pressure oscillations; when they strike a surface they are either reflected, transmitted, or absorbed. When they're transmitted, you'll hear them on the other side.



    According to Wikipedia, regarding acoustic absorption:




    Deformation causes mechanical losses via conversion of part of the sound energy into heat, resulting in acoustic attenuation, mostly due to the wall's viscosity.



    The fraction of sound absorbed is governed by the acoustic impedances of both media and is a function of frequency and the incident angle.



    In general, soft, pliable, or porous materials (like cloths) serve as good acoustic insulators - absorbing most sound, whereas dense, hard, impenetrable materials (such as metals) reflect most.




    So, walls will reflect the sound waves, as well as absorb them. The effectiveness of this depends on the material properties of the wall, as well as the frequency of the sound (low frequencies travel much easier through plywood, for instance).






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      13












      $begingroup$

      Sound waves are just pressure oscillations; when they strike a surface they are either reflected, transmitted, or absorbed. When they're transmitted, you'll hear them on the other side.



      According to Wikipedia, regarding acoustic absorption:




      Deformation causes mechanical losses via conversion of part of the sound energy into heat, resulting in acoustic attenuation, mostly due to the wall's viscosity.



      The fraction of sound absorbed is governed by the acoustic impedances of both media and is a function of frequency and the incident angle.



      In general, soft, pliable, or porous materials (like cloths) serve as good acoustic insulators - absorbing most sound, whereas dense, hard, impenetrable materials (such as metals) reflect most.




      So, walls will reflect the sound waves, as well as absorb them. The effectiveness of this depends on the material properties of the wall, as well as the frequency of the sound (low frequencies travel much easier through plywood, for instance).






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        13












        13








        13





        $begingroup$

        Sound waves are just pressure oscillations; when they strike a surface they are either reflected, transmitted, or absorbed. When they're transmitted, you'll hear them on the other side.



        According to Wikipedia, regarding acoustic absorption:




        Deformation causes mechanical losses via conversion of part of the sound energy into heat, resulting in acoustic attenuation, mostly due to the wall's viscosity.



        The fraction of sound absorbed is governed by the acoustic impedances of both media and is a function of frequency and the incident angle.



        In general, soft, pliable, or porous materials (like cloths) serve as good acoustic insulators - absorbing most sound, whereas dense, hard, impenetrable materials (such as metals) reflect most.




        So, walls will reflect the sound waves, as well as absorb them. The effectiveness of this depends on the material properties of the wall, as well as the frequency of the sound (low frequencies travel much easier through plywood, for instance).






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Sound waves are just pressure oscillations; when they strike a surface they are either reflected, transmitted, or absorbed. When they're transmitted, you'll hear them on the other side.



        According to Wikipedia, regarding acoustic absorption:




        Deformation causes mechanical losses via conversion of part of the sound energy into heat, resulting in acoustic attenuation, mostly due to the wall's viscosity.



        The fraction of sound absorbed is governed by the acoustic impedances of both media and is a function of frequency and the incident angle.



        In general, soft, pliable, or porous materials (like cloths) serve as good acoustic insulators - absorbing most sound, whereas dense, hard, impenetrable materials (such as metals) reflect most.




        So, walls will reflect the sound waves, as well as absorb them. The effectiveness of this depends on the material properties of the wall, as well as the frequency of the sound (low frequencies travel much easier through plywood, for instance).







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered May 2 at 21:07









        Will CharbonneauWill Charbonneau

        1313




        1313





















            12












            $begingroup$

            It does.



            There's an important concept in soundproofing called flanking noise. There are various sources, but the most common is having sound transmitted through some kind of solid structure (walls, roof struts, door and window frames, etc.) into the soundproofed area. This is a major problem for soundproofing, and it's one of the hardest problems to solve because it's hard to completely isolate a room from its surroundings.



            It also leads to interesting problems in multiple-occupancy buildings. A friend of mine used to live in a row of new-build terraced houses which had been constructed with continuous supporting girders running between houses (instead of having solid "bulkhead" walls between them, as usual for older terraced houses). The result was that a noisy neighbour at the opposite end of the row could still be heard clearly in my friend's house. Many flats have similar problems, with sound transmitted through the concrete structure. Any dense, rigid material transmits sound reasonably effectively.



            Although these dense, rigid materials are good at transmitting sound along themselves from one end to the other, they're not so good at broadcasting the sound in air. For us to hear it, either we have to be close to or touching the structure itself, or the structure has to cause the air to vibrate. A flat brick wall isn't very good at vibrating, although of course it will do to some extent However, attach plasterboard (rockwall) to that wall and your plasterboard becomes a "sounding board" in the same way as the top of a guitar. Your bed frame can do the same, which is why you can hear building-transmitted sounds more clearly when lying in bed.



            If you want to stop this happening, it's fairly achievable. The flat brick wall isn't great at putting energy into the air. If your plasterboard wall is not physically connected to the brick wall it's in front of, the sound has to be transmitted into the air in the gap between, into the plasterboard, and back into the air on the other side. Each step is inefficient, so you end up with a quieter room.



            Don't forget the flanking noise though. Whilst you've stopped sound coming through the wall, sound also goes up the wall to the ceiling and down the wall to the floor - and your plasterboard wall inside has to be fixed to something, right? So the sound gets in that way instead. Not so much, but still plenty enough to be significant.



            A properly acoustically-isolated room therefore doesn't attach to anything. The isolated room is constructed as an isolated box, with no connections to the outside on the walls or ceiling. There are separate inner-room and outer-room doors with a vestibule between, so sound can't get through the door frames. And on the floor, the box sits on some kind of sprung supports (neoprene rubber for cheaper, smaller builds, or car springs for large professional installations) which transmit as little sound from the outer-room floor to the inner-room floor as possible.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I like this answer much better than the one I wrote.
              $endgroup$
              – rob
              May 3 at 17:39






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              "A properly acoustically-isolated room therefore doesn't attach to anything." That doesn't seem possible. The room has to connect to the house frame somehow, right?
              $endgroup$
              – Jim Clay
              May 3 at 19:20






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @JimClay Nope, that's the point. It's called "room within a room", so the inner room touches the rest of the house as little as possible. Floor and that's it, if it's done properly. And like I said, a serious job will isolate the floor as well.
              $endgroup$
              – Graham
              May 3 at 20:41






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @JimClay An extreme example of vibration isolation: a floating table in a floating room, for neutron interferometry. That system has active vibration cancellation, if I recall correctly, but passive floating tables are common in optics labs.
              $endgroup$
              – rob
              May 3 at 22:17






            • 2




              $begingroup$
              A Victorian book I have talks of good building practice using two separate set of joists between floors - one for the upstairs floor, a second set(mounted slightly lower) for the downstairs ceiling, to reduce sound transmission.
              $endgroup$
              – Brian Drummond
              May 4 at 20:24















            12












            $begingroup$

            It does.



            There's an important concept in soundproofing called flanking noise. There are various sources, but the most common is having sound transmitted through some kind of solid structure (walls, roof struts, door and window frames, etc.) into the soundproofed area. This is a major problem for soundproofing, and it's one of the hardest problems to solve because it's hard to completely isolate a room from its surroundings.



            It also leads to interesting problems in multiple-occupancy buildings. A friend of mine used to live in a row of new-build terraced houses which had been constructed with continuous supporting girders running between houses (instead of having solid "bulkhead" walls between them, as usual for older terraced houses). The result was that a noisy neighbour at the opposite end of the row could still be heard clearly in my friend's house. Many flats have similar problems, with sound transmitted through the concrete structure. Any dense, rigid material transmits sound reasonably effectively.



            Although these dense, rigid materials are good at transmitting sound along themselves from one end to the other, they're not so good at broadcasting the sound in air. For us to hear it, either we have to be close to or touching the structure itself, or the structure has to cause the air to vibrate. A flat brick wall isn't very good at vibrating, although of course it will do to some extent However, attach plasterboard (rockwall) to that wall and your plasterboard becomes a "sounding board" in the same way as the top of a guitar. Your bed frame can do the same, which is why you can hear building-transmitted sounds more clearly when lying in bed.



            If you want to stop this happening, it's fairly achievable. The flat brick wall isn't great at putting energy into the air. If your plasterboard wall is not physically connected to the brick wall it's in front of, the sound has to be transmitted into the air in the gap between, into the plasterboard, and back into the air on the other side. Each step is inefficient, so you end up with a quieter room.



            Don't forget the flanking noise though. Whilst you've stopped sound coming through the wall, sound also goes up the wall to the ceiling and down the wall to the floor - and your plasterboard wall inside has to be fixed to something, right? So the sound gets in that way instead. Not so much, but still plenty enough to be significant.



            A properly acoustically-isolated room therefore doesn't attach to anything. The isolated room is constructed as an isolated box, with no connections to the outside on the walls or ceiling. There are separate inner-room and outer-room doors with a vestibule between, so sound can't get through the door frames. And on the floor, the box sits on some kind of sprung supports (neoprene rubber for cheaper, smaller builds, or car springs for large professional installations) which transmit as little sound from the outer-room floor to the inner-room floor as possible.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I like this answer much better than the one I wrote.
              $endgroup$
              – rob
              May 3 at 17:39






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              "A properly acoustically-isolated room therefore doesn't attach to anything." That doesn't seem possible. The room has to connect to the house frame somehow, right?
              $endgroup$
              – Jim Clay
              May 3 at 19:20






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @JimClay Nope, that's the point. It's called "room within a room", so the inner room touches the rest of the house as little as possible. Floor and that's it, if it's done properly. And like I said, a serious job will isolate the floor as well.
              $endgroup$
              – Graham
              May 3 at 20:41






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @JimClay An extreme example of vibration isolation: a floating table in a floating room, for neutron interferometry. That system has active vibration cancellation, if I recall correctly, but passive floating tables are common in optics labs.
              $endgroup$
              – rob
              May 3 at 22:17






            • 2




              $begingroup$
              A Victorian book I have talks of good building practice using two separate set of joists between floors - one for the upstairs floor, a second set(mounted slightly lower) for the downstairs ceiling, to reduce sound transmission.
              $endgroup$
              – Brian Drummond
              May 4 at 20:24













            12












            12








            12





            $begingroup$

            It does.



            There's an important concept in soundproofing called flanking noise. There are various sources, but the most common is having sound transmitted through some kind of solid structure (walls, roof struts, door and window frames, etc.) into the soundproofed area. This is a major problem for soundproofing, and it's one of the hardest problems to solve because it's hard to completely isolate a room from its surroundings.



            It also leads to interesting problems in multiple-occupancy buildings. A friend of mine used to live in a row of new-build terraced houses which had been constructed with continuous supporting girders running between houses (instead of having solid "bulkhead" walls between them, as usual for older terraced houses). The result was that a noisy neighbour at the opposite end of the row could still be heard clearly in my friend's house. Many flats have similar problems, with sound transmitted through the concrete structure. Any dense, rigid material transmits sound reasonably effectively.



            Although these dense, rigid materials are good at transmitting sound along themselves from one end to the other, they're not so good at broadcasting the sound in air. For us to hear it, either we have to be close to or touching the structure itself, or the structure has to cause the air to vibrate. A flat brick wall isn't very good at vibrating, although of course it will do to some extent However, attach plasterboard (rockwall) to that wall and your plasterboard becomes a "sounding board" in the same way as the top of a guitar. Your bed frame can do the same, which is why you can hear building-transmitted sounds more clearly when lying in bed.



            If you want to stop this happening, it's fairly achievable. The flat brick wall isn't great at putting energy into the air. If your plasterboard wall is not physically connected to the brick wall it's in front of, the sound has to be transmitted into the air in the gap between, into the plasterboard, and back into the air on the other side. Each step is inefficient, so you end up with a quieter room.



            Don't forget the flanking noise though. Whilst you've stopped sound coming through the wall, sound also goes up the wall to the ceiling and down the wall to the floor - and your plasterboard wall inside has to be fixed to something, right? So the sound gets in that way instead. Not so much, but still plenty enough to be significant.



            A properly acoustically-isolated room therefore doesn't attach to anything. The isolated room is constructed as an isolated box, with no connections to the outside on the walls or ceiling. There are separate inner-room and outer-room doors with a vestibule between, so sound can't get through the door frames. And on the floor, the box sits on some kind of sprung supports (neoprene rubber for cheaper, smaller builds, or car springs for large professional installations) which transmit as little sound from the outer-room floor to the inner-room floor as possible.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            It does.



            There's an important concept in soundproofing called flanking noise. There are various sources, but the most common is having sound transmitted through some kind of solid structure (walls, roof struts, door and window frames, etc.) into the soundproofed area. This is a major problem for soundproofing, and it's one of the hardest problems to solve because it's hard to completely isolate a room from its surroundings.



            It also leads to interesting problems in multiple-occupancy buildings. A friend of mine used to live in a row of new-build terraced houses which had been constructed with continuous supporting girders running between houses (instead of having solid "bulkhead" walls between them, as usual for older terraced houses). The result was that a noisy neighbour at the opposite end of the row could still be heard clearly in my friend's house. Many flats have similar problems, with sound transmitted through the concrete structure. Any dense, rigid material transmits sound reasonably effectively.



            Although these dense, rigid materials are good at transmitting sound along themselves from one end to the other, they're not so good at broadcasting the sound in air. For us to hear it, either we have to be close to or touching the structure itself, or the structure has to cause the air to vibrate. A flat brick wall isn't very good at vibrating, although of course it will do to some extent However, attach plasterboard (rockwall) to that wall and your plasterboard becomes a "sounding board" in the same way as the top of a guitar. Your bed frame can do the same, which is why you can hear building-transmitted sounds more clearly when lying in bed.



            If you want to stop this happening, it's fairly achievable. The flat brick wall isn't great at putting energy into the air. If your plasterboard wall is not physically connected to the brick wall it's in front of, the sound has to be transmitted into the air in the gap between, into the plasterboard, and back into the air on the other side. Each step is inefficient, so you end up with a quieter room.



            Don't forget the flanking noise though. Whilst you've stopped sound coming through the wall, sound also goes up the wall to the ceiling and down the wall to the floor - and your plasterboard wall inside has to be fixed to something, right? So the sound gets in that way instead. Not so much, but still plenty enough to be significant.



            A properly acoustically-isolated room therefore doesn't attach to anything. The isolated room is constructed as an isolated box, with no connections to the outside on the walls or ceiling. There are separate inner-room and outer-room doors with a vestibule between, so sound can't get through the door frames. And on the floor, the box sits on some kind of sprung supports (neoprene rubber for cheaper, smaller builds, or car springs for large professional installations) which transmit as little sound from the outer-room floor to the inner-room floor as possible.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered May 3 at 12:26









            GrahamGraham

            1,324511




            1,324511







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I like this answer much better than the one I wrote.
              $endgroup$
              – rob
              May 3 at 17:39






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              "A properly acoustically-isolated room therefore doesn't attach to anything." That doesn't seem possible. The room has to connect to the house frame somehow, right?
              $endgroup$
              – Jim Clay
              May 3 at 19:20






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @JimClay Nope, that's the point. It's called "room within a room", so the inner room touches the rest of the house as little as possible. Floor and that's it, if it's done properly. And like I said, a serious job will isolate the floor as well.
              $endgroup$
              – Graham
              May 3 at 20:41






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @JimClay An extreme example of vibration isolation: a floating table in a floating room, for neutron interferometry. That system has active vibration cancellation, if I recall correctly, but passive floating tables are common in optics labs.
              $endgroup$
              – rob
              May 3 at 22:17






            • 2




              $begingroup$
              A Victorian book I have talks of good building practice using two separate set of joists between floors - one for the upstairs floor, a second set(mounted slightly lower) for the downstairs ceiling, to reduce sound transmission.
              $endgroup$
              – Brian Drummond
              May 4 at 20:24












            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I like this answer much better than the one I wrote.
              $endgroup$
              – rob
              May 3 at 17:39






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              "A properly acoustically-isolated room therefore doesn't attach to anything." That doesn't seem possible. The room has to connect to the house frame somehow, right?
              $endgroup$
              – Jim Clay
              May 3 at 19:20






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @JimClay Nope, that's the point. It's called "room within a room", so the inner room touches the rest of the house as little as possible. Floor and that's it, if it's done properly. And like I said, a serious job will isolate the floor as well.
              $endgroup$
              – Graham
              May 3 at 20:41






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @JimClay An extreme example of vibration isolation: a floating table in a floating room, for neutron interferometry. That system has active vibration cancellation, if I recall correctly, but passive floating tables are common in optics labs.
              $endgroup$
              – rob
              May 3 at 22:17






            • 2




              $begingroup$
              A Victorian book I have talks of good building practice using two separate set of joists between floors - one for the upstairs floor, a second set(mounted slightly lower) for the downstairs ceiling, to reduce sound transmission.
              $endgroup$
              – Brian Drummond
              May 4 at 20:24







            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            I like this answer much better than the one I wrote.
            $endgroup$
            – rob
            May 3 at 17:39




            $begingroup$
            I like this answer much better than the one I wrote.
            $endgroup$
            – rob
            May 3 at 17:39




            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            "A properly acoustically-isolated room therefore doesn't attach to anything." That doesn't seem possible. The room has to connect to the house frame somehow, right?
            $endgroup$
            – Jim Clay
            May 3 at 19:20




            $begingroup$
            "A properly acoustically-isolated room therefore doesn't attach to anything." That doesn't seem possible. The room has to connect to the house frame somehow, right?
            $endgroup$
            – Jim Clay
            May 3 at 19:20




            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            @JimClay Nope, that's the point. It's called "room within a room", so the inner room touches the rest of the house as little as possible. Floor and that's it, if it's done properly. And like I said, a serious job will isolate the floor as well.
            $endgroup$
            – Graham
            May 3 at 20:41




            $begingroup$
            @JimClay Nope, that's the point. It's called "room within a room", so the inner room touches the rest of the house as little as possible. Floor and that's it, if it's done properly. And like I said, a serious job will isolate the floor as well.
            $endgroup$
            – Graham
            May 3 at 20:41




            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            @JimClay An extreme example of vibration isolation: a floating table in a floating room, for neutron interferometry. That system has active vibration cancellation, if I recall correctly, but passive floating tables are common in optics labs.
            $endgroup$
            – rob
            May 3 at 22:17




            $begingroup$
            @JimClay An extreme example of vibration isolation: a floating table in a floating room, for neutron interferometry. That system has active vibration cancellation, if I recall correctly, but passive floating tables are common in optics labs.
            $endgroup$
            – rob
            May 3 at 22:17




            2




            2




            $begingroup$
            A Victorian book I have talks of good building practice using two separate set of joists between floors - one for the upstairs floor, a second set(mounted slightly lower) for the downstairs ceiling, to reduce sound transmission.
            $endgroup$
            – Brian Drummond
            May 4 at 20:24




            $begingroup$
            A Victorian book I have talks of good building practice using two separate set of joists between floors - one for the upstairs floor, a second set(mounted slightly lower) for the downstairs ceiling, to reduce sound transmission.
            $endgroup$
            – Brian Drummond
            May 4 at 20:24



            Popular posts from this blog

            Wikipedia:Vital articles Мазмуну Biography - Өмүр баян Philosophy and psychology - Философия жана психология Religion - Дин Social sciences - Коомдук илимдер Language and literature - Тил жана адабият Science - Илим Technology - Технология Arts and recreation - Искусство жана эс алуу History and geography - Тарых жана география Навигация менюсу

            Club Baloncesto Breogán Índice Historia | Pavillón | Nome | O Breogán na cultura popular | Xogadores | Adestradores | Presidentes | Palmarés | Historial | Líderes | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióncbbreogan.galCadroGuía oficial da ACB 2009-10, páxina 201Guía oficial ACB 1992, páxina 183. Editorial DB.É de 6.500 espectadores sentados axeitándose á última normativa"Estudiantes Junior, entre as mellores canteiras"o orixinalHemeroteca El Mundo Deportivo, 16 setembro de 1970, páxina 12Historia do BreogánAlfredo Pérez, o último canoneiroHistoria C.B. BreogánHemeroteca de El Mundo DeportivoJimmy Wright, norteamericano do Breogán deixará Lugo por ameazas de morteResultados de Breogán en 1986-87Resultados de Breogán en 1990-91Ficha de Velimir Perasović en acb.comResultados de Breogán en 1994-95Breogán arrasa al Barça. "El Mundo Deportivo", 27 de setembro de 1999, páxina 58CB Breogán - FC BarcelonaA FEB invita a participar nunha nova Liga EuropeaCharlie Bell na prensa estatalMáximos anotadores 2005Tempada 2005-06 : Tódolos Xogadores da Xornada""Non quero pensar nunha man negra, mais pregúntome que está a pasar""o orixinalRaúl López, orgulloso dos xogadores, presume da boa saúde económica do BreogánJulio González confirma que cesa como presidente del BreogánHomenaxe a Lisardo GómezA tempada do rexurdimento celesteEntrevista a Lisardo GómezEl COB dinamita el Pazo para forzar el quinto (69-73)Cafés Candelas, patrocinador del CB Breogán"Suso Lázare, novo presidente do Breogán"o orixinalCafés Candelas Breogán firma el mayor triunfo de la historiaEl Breogán realizará 17 homenajes por su cincuenta aniversario"O Breogán honra ao seu fundador e primeiro presidente"o orixinalMiguel Giao recibiu a homenaxe do PazoHomenaxe aos primeiros gladiadores celestesO home que nos amosa como ver o Breo co corazónTita Franco será homenaxeada polos #50anosdeBreoJulio Vila recibirá unha homenaxe in memoriam polos #50anosdeBreo"O Breogán homenaxeará aos seus aboados máis veteráns"Pechada ovación a «Capi» Sanmartín e Ricardo «Corazón de González»Homenaxe por décadas de informaciónPaco García volve ao Pazo con motivo do 50 aniversario"Resultados y clasificaciones""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, campión da Copa Princesa""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, equipo ACB"C.B. Breogán"Proxecto social"o orixinal"Centros asociados"o orixinalFicha en imdb.comMario Camus trata la recuperación del amor en 'La vieja música', su última película"Páxina web oficial""Club Baloncesto Breogán""C. B. Breogán S.A.D."eehttp://www.fegaba.com

            What should I write in an apology letter, since I have decided not to join a company after accepting an offer letterShould I keep looking after accepting a job offer?What should I do when I've been verbally told I would get an offer letter, but still haven't gotten one after 4 weeks?Do I accept an offer from a company that I am not likely to join?New job hasn't confirmed starting date and I want to give current employer as much notice as possibleHow should I address my manager in my resignation letter?HR delayed background verification, now jobless as resignedNo email communication after accepting a formal written offer. How should I phrase the call?What should I do if after receiving a verbal offer letter I am informed that my written job offer is put on hold due to some internal issues?Should I inform the current employer that I am about to resign within 1-2 weeks since I have signed the offer letter and waiting for visa?What company will do, if I send their offer letter to another company