Unit test when a method calls another oneSimple Apex class to return a list of stringsCode Coverage Queryhow to test a future method which makes callouts?Is simple get set should be covered with system.assert?Site.getBaseUrl returns empty string in test methodCannot Return a List of Strings - Void method must not return a valueapex test class for web api callTest class code coverage failsTest Class Only Covers the Callout Method but the rest of the methods isn'tTest Class/Method for TriggerHandler - Negative scenario

Anatomically Correct Carnivorous Tree

Is taking modulus on both sides of an equation valid?

Ex-manager wants to stay in touch, I don't want to

On studying Computer Science vs. Software Engineering to become a proficient coder

On what legal basis did the UK remove the 'European Union' from its passport?

Can I say: "When was your train leaving?" if the train leaves in the future?

Developers demotivated due to working on same project for more than 2 years

How to cope with regret and shame about not fully utilizing opportunities during PhD?

Why are solar panels kept tilted?

LWC1513: @salesforce/resourceUrl modules only support default imports

Find hamming distance between two Strings of equal length in Java

return tuple of uncopyable objects

Is there any good reason to write "it is easy to see"?

Why is it harder to turn a motor/generator with shorted terminals?

What is the largest number of identical satellites launched together?

What should a student do when they are the victim of a FERPA violation?

What episode was being referenced by this part of Discovery's season 2 episode 13 recap?

What kind of SATA connector is this?

How can a layman easily get the consensus view of what academia *thinks* about a subject?

Solubility in different pressure conditions

When a land becomes a creature, is it untapped?

How exactly does artificial gravity work?

German characters on US-International keyboard layout

Was this character’s old age look CGI or make-up?



Unit test when a method calls another one


Simple Apex class to return a list of stringsCode Coverage Queryhow to test a future method which makes callouts?Is simple get set should be covered with system.assert?Site.getBaseUrl returns empty string in test methodCannot Return a List of Strings - Void method must not return a valueapex test class for web api callTest class code coverage failsTest Class Only Covers the Callout Method but the rest of the methods isn'tTest Class/Method for TriggerHandler - Negative scenario






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2















I have the current scenario and it's not clear which is the best way to test it.



public class FirstClass 
public Integer firstMethod()
return SecondClass.secondClass_Handler();


public class SecondClass
public Integer secondClass_Handler()
//complex logic here to calculate the Integer returned




The method SecondClass.secondClass_Handler is very complex and I have written all test cases to cover it.
Now the question is: how can I handle the test cases for the method FirstClass.firstMethod()?



Should I write again all test cases (and duplicate them) or can I skip that becasue the main logic has just tested?



Thanks










share|improve this question






























    2















    I have the current scenario and it's not clear which is the best way to test it.



    public class FirstClass 
    public Integer firstMethod()
    return SecondClass.secondClass_Handler();


    public class SecondClass
    public Integer secondClass_Handler()
    //complex logic here to calculate the Integer returned




    The method SecondClass.secondClass_Handler is very complex and I have written all test cases to cover it.
    Now the question is: how can I handle the test cases for the method FirstClass.firstMethod()?



    Should I write again all test cases (and duplicate them) or can I skip that becasue the main logic has just tested?



    Thanks










    share|improve this question


























      2












      2








      2








      I have the current scenario and it's not clear which is the best way to test it.



      public class FirstClass 
      public Integer firstMethod()
      return SecondClass.secondClass_Handler();


      public class SecondClass
      public Integer secondClass_Handler()
      //complex logic here to calculate the Integer returned




      The method SecondClass.secondClass_Handler is very complex and I have written all test cases to cover it.
      Now the question is: how can I handle the test cases for the method FirstClass.firstMethod()?



      Should I write again all test cases (and duplicate them) or can I skip that becasue the main logic has just tested?



      Thanks










      share|improve this question
















      I have the current scenario and it's not clear which is the best way to test it.



      public class FirstClass 
      public Integer firstMethod()
      return SecondClass.secondClass_Handler();


      public class SecondClass
      public Integer secondClass_Handler()
      //complex logic here to calculate the Integer returned




      The method SecondClass.secondClass_Handler is very complex and I have written all test cases to cover it.
      Now the question is: how can I handle the test cases for the method FirstClass.firstMethod()?



      Should I write again all test cases (and duplicate them) or can I skip that becasue the main logic has just tested?



      Thanks







      apex unit-test code-coverage






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited May 2 at 13:19









      fromero

      195114




      195114










      asked May 2 at 13:17









      vt89vt89

      328212




      328212




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          There's a few different ways to approach it, and none of them is definitely the right answer for every single situation.



          If firstMethod() is really just one line of code, I'd cover it with a single integration test validating that its action is correct based on the expected value returned by secondClass_Handler() for the given input. But I doubt in your real class that it's one line of code. It may be feasible to cover it with multiple integration tests that don't simply replicate the unit tests you already wrote for secondClass_Handler().



          The fuller-scale solution I would use if I wanted a "true" unit test is to dependency inject SecondClass in FirstClass so that you control the return value of secondClass_Handler() and can test firstMethod() in isolation. There's more than one way to implement that; the usual route that I use is interface-based. Inside FirstClass:



          private @TestVisible interface ISecondClassDelegate 
          Integer secondClass_Handler();


          private @TestVisible class SecondClassConcreteDelegate implements ISecondClassDelegate
          public Integer secondClass_Handler()
          return SecondClass.secondClass_Handler();



          @TestVisible private secondClassDelegate = new SecondClassConcreteDelegate();

          public Integer firstMethod()
          return this.mySecondClassHandler.secondClass_Handler();



          then, in the unit test,



          private class MockSecondClassDelegate implements FirstClass.ISecondClassDelegate 
          public Integer secondClass_Handler()
          return 1; // or what have you.



          @isTest
          public static void testFirstMethod()
          FirstClass f = new FirstClass();
          f.secondClassDelegate = new MockSecondClassDelegate();

          // test logic for a return value of 1.



          That's a fair amount of boilerplate, and whether or not it's appropriate and needed to effectively validate the behavior of firstMethod() is a decision you'll have to make based on your understanding of the code and its interaction with secondClass_Handler().






          share|improve this answer






























            0














            You can skip them for unit tests, although some organizations prefer to write "functional" unit tests as well (to test end-to-end functionality). This ensures that there's no governor limit issues, etc.






            share|improve this answer























              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "459"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f260885%2funit-test-when-a-method-calls-another-one%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              3














              There's a few different ways to approach it, and none of them is definitely the right answer for every single situation.



              If firstMethod() is really just one line of code, I'd cover it with a single integration test validating that its action is correct based on the expected value returned by secondClass_Handler() for the given input. But I doubt in your real class that it's one line of code. It may be feasible to cover it with multiple integration tests that don't simply replicate the unit tests you already wrote for secondClass_Handler().



              The fuller-scale solution I would use if I wanted a "true" unit test is to dependency inject SecondClass in FirstClass so that you control the return value of secondClass_Handler() and can test firstMethod() in isolation. There's more than one way to implement that; the usual route that I use is interface-based. Inside FirstClass:



              private @TestVisible interface ISecondClassDelegate 
              Integer secondClass_Handler();


              private @TestVisible class SecondClassConcreteDelegate implements ISecondClassDelegate
              public Integer secondClass_Handler()
              return SecondClass.secondClass_Handler();



              @TestVisible private secondClassDelegate = new SecondClassConcreteDelegate();

              public Integer firstMethod()
              return this.mySecondClassHandler.secondClass_Handler();



              then, in the unit test,



              private class MockSecondClassDelegate implements FirstClass.ISecondClassDelegate 
              public Integer secondClass_Handler()
              return 1; // or what have you.



              @isTest
              public static void testFirstMethod()
              FirstClass f = new FirstClass();
              f.secondClassDelegate = new MockSecondClassDelegate();

              // test logic for a return value of 1.



              That's a fair amount of boilerplate, and whether or not it's appropriate and needed to effectively validate the behavior of firstMethod() is a decision you'll have to make based on your understanding of the code and its interaction with secondClass_Handler().






              share|improve this answer



























                3














                There's a few different ways to approach it, and none of them is definitely the right answer for every single situation.



                If firstMethod() is really just one line of code, I'd cover it with a single integration test validating that its action is correct based on the expected value returned by secondClass_Handler() for the given input. But I doubt in your real class that it's one line of code. It may be feasible to cover it with multiple integration tests that don't simply replicate the unit tests you already wrote for secondClass_Handler().



                The fuller-scale solution I would use if I wanted a "true" unit test is to dependency inject SecondClass in FirstClass so that you control the return value of secondClass_Handler() and can test firstMethod() in isolation. There's more than one way to implement that; the usual route that I use is interface-based. Inside FirstClass:



                private @TestVisible interface ISecondClassDelegate 
                Integer secondClass_Handler();


                private @TestVisible class SecondClassConcreteDelegate implements ISecondClassDelegate
                public Integer secondClass_Handler()
                return SecondClass.secondClass_Handler();



                @TestVisible private secondClassDelegate = new SecondClassConcreteDelegate();

                public Integer firstMethod()
                return this.mySecondClassHandler.secondClass_Handler();



                then, in the unit test,



                private class MockSecondClassDelegate implements FirstClass.ISecondClassDelegate 
                public Integer secondClass_Handler()
                return 1; // or what have you.



                @isTest
                public static void testFirstMethod()
                FirstClass f = new FirstClass();
                f.secondClassDelegate = new MockSecondClassDelegate();

                // test logic for a return value of 1.



                That's a fair amount of boilerplate, and whether or not it's appropriate and needed to effectively validate the behavior of firstMethod() is a decision you'll have to make based on your understanding of the code and its interaction with secondClass_Handler().






                share|improve this answer

























                  3












                  3








                  3







                  There's a few different ways to approach it, and none of them is definitely the right answer for every single situation.



                  If firstMethod() is really just one line of code, I'd cover it with a single integration test validating that its action is correct based on the expected value returned by secondClass_Handler() for the given input. But I doubt in your real class that it's one line of code. It may be feasible to cover it with multiple integration tests that don't simply replicate the unit tests you already wrote for secondClass_Handler().



                  The fuller-scale solution I would use if I wanted a "true" unit test is to dependency inject SecondClass in FirstClass so that you control the return value of secondClass_Handler() and can test firstMethod() in isolation. There's more than one way to implement that; the usual route that I use is interface-based. Inside FirstClass:



                  private @TestVisible interface ISecondClassDelegate 
                  Integer secondClass_Handler();


                  private @TestVisible class SecondClassConcreteDelegate implements ISecondClassDelegate
                  public Integer secondClass_Handler()
                  return SecondClass.secondClass_Handler();



                  @TestVisible private secondClassDelegate = new SecondClassConcreteDelegate();

                  public Integer firstMethod()
                  return this.mySecondClassHandler.secondClass_Handler();



                  then, in the unit test,



                  private class MockSecondClassDelegate implements FirstClass.ISecondClassDelegate 
                  public Integer secondClass_Handler()
                  return 1; // or what have you.



                  @isTest
                  public static void testFirstMethod()
                  FirstClass f = new FirstClass();
                  f.secondClassDelegate = new MockSecondClassDelegate();

                  // test logic for a return value of 1.



                  That's a fair amount of boilerplate, and whether or not it's appropriate and needed to effectively validate the behavior of firstMethod() is a decision you'll have to make based on your understanding of the code and its interaction with secondClass_Handler().






                  share|improve this answer













                  There's a few different ways to approach it, and none of them is definitely the right answer for every single situation.



                  If firstMethod() is really just one line of code, I'd cover it with a single integration test validating that its action is correct based on the expected value returned by secondClass_Handler() for the given input. But I doubt in your real class that it's one line of code. It may be feasible to cover it with multiple integration tests that don't simply replicate the unit tests you already wrote for secondClass_Handler().



                  The fuller-scale solution I would use if I wanted a "true" unit test is to dependency inject SecondClass in FirstClass so that you control the return value of secondClass_Handler() and can test firstMethod() in isolation. There's more than one way to implement that; the usual route that I use is interface-based. Inside FirstClass:



                  private @TestVisible interface ISecondClassDelegate 
                  Integer secondClass_Handler();


                  private @TestVisible class SecondClassConcreteDelegate implements ISecondClassDelegate
                  public Integer secondClass_Handler()
                  return SecondClass.secondClass_Handler();



                  @TestVisible private secondClassDelegate = new SecondClassConcreteDelegate();

                  public Integer firstMethod()
                  return this.mySecondClassHandler.secondClass_Handler();



                  then, in the unit test,



                  private class MockSecondClassDelegate implements FirstClass.ISecondClassDelegate 
                  public Integer secondClass_Handler()
                  return 1; // or what have you.



                  @isTest
                  public static void testFirstMethod()
                  FirstClass f = new FirstClass();
                  f.secondClassDelegate = new MockSecondClassDelegate();

                  // test logic for a return value of 1.



                  That's a fair amount of boilerplate, and whether or not it's appropriate and needed to effectively validate the behavior of firstMethod() is a decision you'll have to make based on your understanding of the code and its interaction with secondClass_Handler().







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered May 2 at 13:24









                  David ReedDavid Reed

                  41.8k82463




                  41.8k82463























                      0














                      You can skip them for unit tests, although some organizations prefer to write "functional" unit tests as well (to test end-to-end functionality). This ensures that there's no governor limit issues, etc.






                      share|improve this answer



























                        0














                        You can skip them for unit tests, although some organizations prefer to write "functional" unit tests as well (to test end-to-end functionality). This ensures that there's no governor limit issues, etc.






                        share|improve this answer

























                          0












                          0








                          0







                          You can skip them for unit tests, although some organizations prefer to write "functional" unit tests as well (to test end-to-end functionality). This ensures that there's no governor limit issues, etc.






                          share|improve this answer













                          You can skip them for unit tests, although some organizations prefer to write "functional" unit tests as well (to test end-to-end functionality). This ensures that there's no governor limit issues, etc.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered May 2 at 13:20









                          sfdcfoxsfdcfox

                          270k13217467




                          270k13217467



























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Salesforce Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f260885%2funit-test-when-a-method-calls-another-one%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Club Baloncesto Breogán Índice Historia | Pavillón | Nome | O Breogán na cultura popular | Xogadores | Adestradores | Presidentes | Palmarés | Historial | Líderes | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióncbbreogan.galCadroGuía oficial da ACB 2009-10, páxina 201Guía oficial ACB 1992, páxina 183. Editorial DB.É de 6.500 espectadores sentados axeitándose á última normativa"Estudiantes Junior, entre as mellores canteiras"o orixinalHemeroteca El Mundo Deportivo, 16 setembro de 1970, páxina 12Historia do BreogánAlfredo Pérez, o último canoneiroHistoria C.B. BreogánHemeroteca de El Mundo DeportivoJimmy Wright, norteamericano do Breogán deixará Lugo por ameazas de morteResultados de Breogán en 1986-87Resultados de Breogán en 1990-91Ficha de Velimir Perasović en acb.comResultados de Breogán en 1994-95Breogán arrasa al Barça. "El Mundo Deportivo", 27 de setembro de 1999, páxina 58CB Breogán - FC BarcelonaA FEB invita a participar nunha nova Liga EuropeaCharlie Bell na prensa estatalMáximos anotadores 2005Tempada 2005-06 : Tódolos Xogadores da Xornada""Non quero pensar nunha man negra, mais pregúntome que está a pasar""o orixinalRaúl López, orgulloso dos xogadores, presume da boa saúde económica do BreogánJulio González confirma que cesa como presidente del BreogánHomenaxe a Lisardo GómezA tempada do rexurdimento celesteEntrevista a Lisardo GómezEl COB dinamita el Pazo para forzar el quinto (69-73)Cafés Candelas, patrocinador del CB Breogán"Suso Lázare, novo presidente do Breogán"o orixinalCafés Candelas Breogán firma el mayor triunfo de la historiaEl Breogán realizará 17 homenajes por su cincuenta aniversario"O Breogán honra ao seu fundador e primeiro presidente"o orixinalMiguel Giao recibiu a homenaxe do PazoHomenaxe aos primeiros gladiadores celestesO home que nos amosa como ver o Breo co corazónTita Franco será homenaxeada polos #50anosdeBreoJulio Vila recibirá unha homenaxe in memoriam polos #50anosdeBreo"O Breogán homenaxeará aos seus aboados máis veteráns"Pechada ovación a «Capi» Sanmartín e Ricardo «Corazón de González»Homenaxe por décadas de informaciónPaco García volve ao Pazo con motivo do 50 aniversario"Resultados y clasificaciones""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, campión da Copa Princesa""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, equipo ACB"C.B. Breogán"Proxecto social"o orixinal"Centros asociados"o orixinalFicha en imdb.comMario Camus trata la recuperación del amor en 'La vieja música', su última película"Páxina web oficial""Club Baloncesto Breogán""C. B. Breogán S.A.D."eehttp://www.fegaba.com

                              Vilaño, A Laracha Índice Patrimonio | Lugares e parroquias | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación43°14′52″N 8°36′03″O / 43.24775, -8.60070

                              Cegueira Índice Epidemioloxía | Deficiencia visual | Tipos de cegueira | Principais causas de cegueira | Tratamento | Técnicas de adaptación e axudas | Vida dos cegos | Primeiros auxilios | Crenzas respecto das persoas cegas | Crenzas das persoas cegas | O neno deficiente visual | Aspectos psicolóxicos da cegueira | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación54.054.154.436928256blindnessDicionario da Real Academia GalegaPortal das Palabras"International Standards: Visual Standards — Aspects and Ranges of Vision Loss with Emphasis on Population Surveys.""Visual impairment and blindness""Presentan un plan para previr a cegueira"o orixinalACCDV Associació Catalana de Cecs i Disminuïts Visuals - PMFTrachoma"Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis"1844137110.1056/NEJMoa0802268Cans guía - os mellores amigos dos cegosArquivadoEscola de cans guía para cegos en Mortágua, PortugalArquivado"Tecnología para ciegos y deficientes visuales. Recopilación de recursos gratuitos en la Red""Colorino""‘COL.diesis’, escuchar los sonidos del color""COL.diesis: Transforming Colour into Melody and Implementing the Result in a Colour Sensor Device"o orixinal"Sistema de desarrollo de sinestesia color-sonido para invidentes utilizando un protocolo de audio""Enseñanza táctil - geometría y color. Juegos didácticos para niños ciegos y videntes""Sistema Constanz"L'ocupació laboral dels cecs a l'Estat espanyol està pràcticament equiparada a la de les persones amb visió, entrevista amb Pedro ZuritaONCE (Organización Nacional de Cegos de España)Prevención da cegueiraDescrición de deficiencias visuais (Disc@pnet)Braillín, un boneco atractivo para calquera neno, con ou sen discapacidade, que permite familiarizarse co sistema de escritura e lectura brailleAxudas Técnicas36838ID00897494007150-90057129528256DOID:1432HP:0000618D001766C10.597.751.941.162C97109C0155020