Where are the “shires” in the UK?What is the name of the tactic that politicians use to bury people with torrent of words?What is the political system where there is a 'friendly' dictatorshipLooking for the correct term for “mutation” of elite phenomenonWhere can I find information on the Troika?What is 'post truth', and why do I hear it all the time?Where will EU money go?Term for the trend where a political party does worse in State elections when holding power FederallyIs there a name for a system where representatives are not party affiliated, but issue affiliated?Is there a website where I can track the passage of a historical Bill?Where have most of the accusations of antisemitism in the labour party come from?

Rounding a number extracted by jq to limit the decimal points

When a land becomes a creature, is it untapped?

How to translate "Keywords" to Spanish "Palabras claves"

Is the expression "To think you would stoop so low" often misused?

Interior smooth regularity

How do employ ' ("prime") in math mode at the correct depth?

Does gravity affect the time evolution of a QM wave function?

Why are solar panels kept tilted?

Anatomically Correct Carnivorous Tree

Why does my circuit work on a breadboard, but not on a perfboard? I am new to soldering

What kind of SATA connector is this?

Conditional probability - sum of dice is even given that at least one is a five

How does emacs `shell-mode` know to prompt for sudo?

What episode was being referenced by this part of Discovery's season 2 episode 13 recap?

Where to find every-day healthy food near Heathrow Airport?

Why is a set not a partition of itself?

Does SQL Server allow (make visible) DDL inside a transaction to the transaction prior to commit?

Are there any established rules for splitting books into parts, chapters, sections etc?

what does a native speaker say when he wanted to leave his work?

Can't find the release for this wiring harness connector

What information do scammers need to withdraw money from an account?

Is taking modulus on both sides of an equation valid?

Why was Thor doubtful about his worthiness to Mjolnir?

Non-deterministic Finite Automata | Sipser Example 1.16



Where are the “shires” in the UK?


What is the name of the tactic that politicians use to bury people with torrent of words?What is the political system where there is a 'friendly' dictatorshipLooking for the correct term for “mutation” of elite phenomenonWhere can I find information on the Troika?What is 'post truth', and why do I hear it all the time?Where will EU money go?Term for the trend where a political party does worse in State elections when holding power FederallyIs there a name for a system where representatives are not party affiliated, but issue affiliated?Is there a website where I can track the passage of a historical Bill?Where have most of the accusations of antisemitism in the labour party come from?













32















Today's Guardian article, "Local elections: Tories tipped for heavy losses," contains the following statement:




...the Conservatives could lose about 500 seats to the Lib Dems and 300
to Labour. The latter traditionally makes fewer gains in the shires,
where many of the elections are being held.




I've never before heard the expression "the shires". What does this refer to? Is it strictly a geographic reference or does it have a more subtle political or demographic meaning?



This was referring to local council elections affecting English and Northern Irish councils.










share|improve this question

















  • 3





    It's probably related to this map, which shows which counties end in "-shire", but I don't actually know if there's a subset of that which is "the shires" in this context.

    – Bobson
    May 2 at 17:01






  • 3





    @Bobson Not really, no.

    – David Richerby
    May 2 at 23:42















32















Today's Guardian article, "Local elections: Tories tipped for heavy losses," contains the following statement:




...the Conservatives could lose about 500 seats to the Lib Dems and 300
to Labour. The latter traditionally makes fewer gains in the shires,
where many of the elections are being held.




I've never before heard the expression "the shires". What does this refer to? Is it strictly a geographic reference or does it have a more subtle political or demographic meaning?



This was referring to local council elections affecting English and Northern Irish councils.










share|improve this question

















  • 3





    It's probably related to this map, which shows which counties end in "-shire", but I don't actually know if there's a subset of that which is "the shires" in this context.

    – Bobson
    May 2 at 17:01






  • 3





    @Bobson Not really, no.

    – David Richerby
    May 2 at 23:42













32












32








32


1






Today's Guardian article, "Local elections: Tories tipped for heavy losses," contains the following statement:




...the Conservatives could lose about 500 seats to the Lib Dems and 300
to Labour. The latter traditionally makes fewer gains in the shires,
where many of the elections are being held.




I've never before heard the expression "the shires". What does this refer to? Is it strictly a geographic reference or does it have a more subtle political or demographic meaning?



This was referring to local council elections affecting English and Northern Irish councils.










share|improve this question














Today's Guardian article, "Local elections: Tories tipped for heavy losses," contains the following statement:




...the Conservatives could lose about 500 seats to the Lib Dems and 300
to Labour. The latter traditionally makes fewer gains in the shires,
where many of the elections are being held.




I've never before heard the expression "the shires". What does this refer to? Is it strictly a geographic reference or does it have a more subtle political or demographic meaning?



This was referring to local council elections affecting English and Northern Irish councils.







united-kingdom terminology






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked May 2 at 16:28









DaveInCazDaveInCaz

31528




31528







  • 3





    It's probably related to this map, which shows which counties end in "-shire", but I don't actually know if there's a subset of that which is "the shires" in this context.

    – Bobson
    May 2 at 17:01






  • 3





    @Bobson Not really, no.

    – David Richerby
    May 2 at 23:42












  • 3





    It's probably related to this map, which shows which counties end in "-shire", but I don't actually know if there's a subset of that which is "the shires" in this context.

    – Bobson
    May 2 at 17:01






  • 3





    @Bobson Not really, no.

    – David Richerby
    May 2 at 23:42







3




3





It's probably related to this map, which shows which counties end in "-shire", but I don't actually know if there's a subset of that which is "the shires" in this context.

– Bobson
May 2 at 17:01





It's probably related to this map, which shows which counties end in "-shire", but I don't actually know if there's a subset of that which is "the shires" in this context.

– Bobson
May 2 at 17:01




3




3





@Bobson Not really, no.

– David Richerby
May 2 at 23:42





@Bobson Not really, no.

– David Richerby
May 2 at 23:42










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















45














This is actually a surprisingly complicated question to answer, or at least to give specifics for. Briefly, a "shire" is a unit of land division, very similar to "county", the first being Anglo-Saxon, the second Norman. As such, many modern British ceremonial/historic counties have the form city name + shire, for example Nottinghamshire. In 1888 local government in England and Wales was restructured to create administrative counties, many of which retained the relevant ceremonial name. Further reform eventually culminated in division into metropolitan (urban) and non-metropolitan(rural) counties/districts with the rural ones sometimes named after ceremonial counties and the urban ones after towns or cities (this has since been further modified.



As such "shires" here is being used as a short hand for non-metropolitan districts. More specifically, this will be more accurate for rural counties in the south and middle of England, where the Labour Party finds less support, although confusingly, many of these don't actually have names ending in '-shire'. Thus the meaning is party geographic, but mostly demographic.






share|improve this answer























  • So the way this term was used in the article, is it implicit that they are referring only to England and not Northern Ireland (which was also referred to earlier in the article)? And if so does this show some sort of bias?

    – DaveInCaz
    May 2 at 17:19






  • 7





    @DaveInCaz This is definitely England only, since the Labour Party aren't registered in Northern Ireland (although they do fellow travel with the SDLP) and the Conservatives never win there. There will be a certain amount of bias in what the Guardian thinks is important (it's a left wing English newspaper now based in London), but there is also a numerical bias in that only 462 seats in Northern Ireland are up for re-election out of 8804 seats in total (there's also 1 seat in Scotland).

    – origimbo
    May 2 at 17:30











  • Yes, elaborating on the last paragraph I think the intended referent is Berkshire/Buckinghamshire/Cambridgeshire etc. rather than Yorkshire/Lancashire/Derbyshire.

    – rlms
    May 2 at 21:53











  • "Thus the meaning is party geographic, but mostly demographic." Eh, the intended sense is obviously both together. The etymology is much more straightforward than you're making it: "shires" were the larger land units and so were/are seen as distinguished from the urban centers. Thus, its use for "the countryside".

    – lly
    May 4 at 8:44


















16














In an electoral context, the shires correspond to the non-metropolitan counties that are colored red on the map below. They are in contrast with the metropolitan counties as defined in the Local Government Act of 1972.



Map of non-metropolitan countries in England




Original (incorrect) answer: If I am not mistaking, the shires in this case are not as convoluted in nature as origimbo's otherwise excellent (and correct) answer might suggest, and simply refer to the dictionary definition:



dictionary definition of Shires






share|improve this answer

























  • Although that definition leaves two questions i) which of the three (or more?) definitions of county do you mean and ii) where do the Midlands start and stop?

    – origimbo
    May 2 at 22:09











  • It's useful to have a simple definition, which is fine. This does not invalidate the more complex definition. Similar to the fact that the UK is composed of three, or four countries, depending on how you count "Englandandwales" as one kingdom or as two countries. It's both; but most people want the simple definition.

    – Rich
    May 2 at 22:56






  • 3





    @origimbo Which definition of "county" doesn't much matter. And it's rather silly of you to demand a precise definition of "Midlands" when you use the equally vague term "south and middle of England" in your own answer. Where does that start or stop?

    – David Richerby
    May 2 at 23:44






  • 1





    @DavidRicherby No major criticism was intended; as with terms like "the Midwest", it's an extremely difficult (but interesting) thing to investigate with government and dictionary definitions not always in line with the map in peoples' heads. fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-states-are-in-the-midwest

    – origimbo
    May 3 at 0:06







  • 1





    If London gets fed up with a hard Brexit and secedes to rejoin the EU, you could call the remaining part "the Shire" :)

    – JollyJoker
    May 3 at 7:34


















6














In the context that The Guardian is using it, the shires are areas whose names end in -shire. For example Wiltshire and Hampshire.



Traditionally most of those areas have been politically conservative and where the Tory party has a strong base. They tend to be more rural. However, the recent failure to deliver Brexit has damaged the Tory party and they seem to be losing support in their traditional heartlands.



So "the shires" is just a shorthand way of addressing that poorly defined collection of traditionally Tory leaning areas, rather than referring to specific geographical locations.






share|improve this answer

























  • Thanks for addressing the sense in which the article used the term.

    – DaveInCaz
    May 3 at 11:45











  • It also includes Kent and Sussex in the usual case

    – Ian Turton
    May 3 at 17:26






  • 2





    I suspect by "poorly" you meant "poorly defined".

    – Michael Kay
    May 4 at 21:52











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "475"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f41208%2fwhere-are-the-shires-in-the-uk%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









45














This is actually a surprisingly complicated question to answer, or at least to give specifics for. Briefly, a "shire" is a unit of land division, very similar to "county", the first being Anglo-Saxon, the second Norman. As such, many modern British ceremonial/historic counties have the form city name + shire, for example Nottinghamshire. In 1888 local government in England and Wales was restructured to create administrative counties, many of which retained the relevant ceremonial name. Further reform eventually culminated in division into metropolitan (urban) and non-metropolitan(rural) counties/districts with the rural ones sometimes named after ceremonial counties and the urban ones after towns or cities (this has since been further modified.



As such "shires" here is being used as a short hand for non-metropolitan districts. More specifically, this will be more accurate for rural counties in the south and middle of England, where the Labour Party finds less support, although confusingly, many of these don't actually have names ending in '-shire'. Thus the meaning is party geographic, but mostly demographic.






share|improve this answer























  • So the way this term was used in the article, is it implicit that they are referring only to England and not Northern Ireland (which was also referred to earlier in the article)? And if so does this show some sort of bias?

    – DaveInCaz
    May 2 at 17:19






  • 7





    @DaveInCaz This is definitely England only, since the Labour Party aren't registered in Northern Ireland (although they do fellow travel with the SDLP) and the Conservatives never win there. There will be a certain amount of bias in what the Guardian thinks is important (it's a left wing English newspaper now based in London), but there is also a numerical bias in that only 462 seats in Northern Ireland are up for re-election out of 8804 seats in total (there's also 1 seat in Scotland).

    – origimbo
    May 2 at 17:30











  • Yes, elaborating on the last paragraph I think the intended referent is Berkshire/Buckinghamshire/Cambridgeshire etc. rather than Yorkshire/Lancashire/Derbyshire.

    – rlms
    May 2 at 21:53











  • "Thus the meaning is party geographic, but mostly demographic." Eh, the intended sense is obviously both together. The etymology is much more straightforward than you're making it: "shires" were the larger land units and so were/are seen as distinguished from the urban centers. Thus, its use for "the countryside".

    – lly
    May 4 at 8:44















45














This is actually a surprisingly complicated question to answer, or at least to give specifics for. Briefly, a "shire" is a unit of land division, very similar to "county", the first being Anglo-Saxon, the second Norman. As such, many modern British ceremonial/historic counties have the form city name + shire, for example Nottinghamshire. In 1888 local government in England and Wales was restructured to create administrative counties, many of which retained the relevant ceremonial name. Further reform eventually culminated in division into metropolitan (urban) and non-metropolitan(rural) counties/districts with the rural ones sometimes named after ceremonial counties and the urban ones after towns or cities (this has since been further modified.



As such "shires" here is being used as a short hand for non-metropolitan districts. More specifically, this will be more accurate for rural counties in the south and middle of England, where the Labour Party finds less support, although confusingly, many of these don't actually have names ending in '-shire'. Thus the meaning is party geographic, but mostly demographic.






share|improve this answer























  • So the way this term was used in the article, is it implicit that they are referring only to England and not Northern Ireland (which was also referred to earlier in the article)? And if so does this show some sort of bias?

    – DaveInCaz
    May 2 at 17:19






  • 7





    @DaveInCaz This is definitely England only, since the Labour Party aren't registered in Northern Ireland (although they do fellow travel with the SDLP) and the Conservatives never win there. There will be a certain amount of bias in what the Guardian thinks is important (it's a left wing English newspaper now based in London), but there is also a numerical bias in that only 462 seats in Northern Ireland are up for re-election out of 8804 seats in total (there's also 1 seat in Scotland).

    – origimbo
    May 2 at 17:30











  • Yes, elaborating on the last paragraph I think the intended referent is Berkshire/Buckinghamshire/Cambridgeshire etc. rather than Yorkshire/Lancashire/Derbyshire.

    – rlms
    May 2 at 21:53











  • "Thus the meaning is party geographic, but mostly demographic." Eh, the intended sense is obviously both together. The etymology is much more straightforward than you're making it: "shires" were the larger land units and so were/are seen as distinguished from the urban centers. Thus, its use for "the countryside".

    – lly
    May 4 at 8:44













45












45








45







This is actually a surprisingly complicated question to answer, or at least to give specifics for. Briefly, a "shire" is a unit of land division, very similar to "county", the first being Anglo-Saxon, the second Norman. As such, many modern British ceremonial/historic counties have the form city name + shire, for example Nottinghamshire. In 1888 local government in England and Wales was restructured to create administrative counties, many of which retained the relevant ceremonial name. Further reform eventually culminated in division into metropolitan (urban) and non-metropolitan(rural) counties/districts with the rural ones sometimes named after ceremonial counties and the urban ones after towns or cities (this has since been further modified.



As such "shires" here is being used as a short hand for non-metropolitan districts. More specifically, this will be more accurate for rural counties in the south and middle of England, where the Labour Party finds less support, although confusingly, many of these don't actually have names ending in '-shire'. Thus the meaning is party geographic, but mostly demographic.






share|improve this answer













This is actually a surprisingly complicated question to answer, or at least to give specifics for. Briefly, a "shire" is a unit of land division, very similar to "county", the first being Anglo-Saxon, the second Norman. As such, many modern British ceremonial/historic counties have the form city name + shire, for example Nottinghamshire. In 1888 local government in England and Wales was restructured to create administrative counties, many of which retained the relevant ceremonial name. Further reform eventually culminated in division into metropolitan (urban) and non-metropolitan(rural) counties/districts with the rural ones sometimes named after ceremonial counties and the urban ones after towns or cities (this has since been further modified.



As such "shires" here is being used as a short hand for non-metropolitan districts. More specifically, this will be more accurate for rural counties in the south and middle of England, where the Labour Party finds less support, although confusingly, many of these don't actually have names ending in '-shire'. Thus the meaning is party geographic, but mostly demographic.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered May 2 at 17:01









origimboorigimbo

14.5k23456




14.5k23456












  • So the way this term was used in the article, is it implicit that they are referring only to England and not Northern Ireland (which was also referred to earlier in the article)? And if so does this show some sort of bias?

    – DaveInCaz
    May 2 at 17:19






  • 7





    @DaveInCaz This is definitely England only, since the Labour Party aren't registered in Northern Ireland (although they do fellow travel with the SDLP) and the Conservatives never win there. There will be a certain amount of bias in what the Guardian thinks is important (it's a left wing English newspaper now based in London), but there is also a numerical bias in that only 462 seats in Northern Ireland are up for re-election out of 8804 seats in total (there's also 1 seat in Scotland).

    – origimbo
    May 2 at 17:30











  • Yes, elaborating on the last paragraph I think the intended referent is Berkshire/Buckinghamshire/Cambridgeshire etc. rather than Yorkshire/Lancashire/Derbyshire.

    – rlms
    May 2 at 21:53











  • "Thus the meaning is party geographic, but mostly demographic." Eh, the intended sense is obviously both together. The etymology is much more straightforward than you're making it: "shires" were the larger land units and so were/are seen as distinguished from the urban centers. Thus, its use for "the countryside".

    – lly
    May 4 at 8:44

















  • So the way this term was used in the article, is it implicit that they are referring only to England and not Northern Ireland (which was also referred to earlier in the article)? And if so does this show some sort of bias?

    – DaveInCaz
    May 2 at 17:19






  • 7





    @DaveInCaz This is definitely England only, since the Labour Party aren't registered in Northern Ireland (although they do fellow travel with the SDLP) and the Conservatives never win there. There will be a certain amount of bias in what the Guardian thinks is important (it's a left wing English newspaper now based in London), but there is also a numerical bias in that only 462 seats in Northern Ireland are up for re-election out of 8804 seats in total (there's also 1 seat in Scotland).

    – origimbo
    May 2 at 17:30











  • Yes, elaborating on the last paragraph I think the intended referent is Berkshire/Buckinghamshire/Cambridgeshire etc. rather than Yorkshire/Lancashire/Derbyshire.

    – rlms
    May 2 at 21:53











  • "Thus the meaning is party geographic, but mostly demographic." Eh, the intended sense is obviously both together. The etymology is much more straightforward than you're making it: "shires" were the larger land units and so were/are seen as distinguished from the urban centers. Thus, its use for "the countryside".

    – lly
    May 4 at 8:44
















So the way this term was used in the article, is it implicit that they are referring only to England and not Northern Ireland (which was also referred to earlier in the article)? And if so does this show some sort of bias?

– DaveInCaz
May 2 at 17:19





So the way this term was used in the article, is it implicit that they are referring only to England and not Northern Ireland (which was also referred to earlier in the article)? And if so does this show some sort of bias?

– DaveInCaz
May 2 at 17:19




7




7





@DaveInCaz This is definitely England only, since the Labour Party aren't registered in Northern Ireland (although they do fellow travel with the SDLP) and the Conservatives never win there. There will be a certain amount of bias in what the Guardian thinks is important (it's a left wing English newspaper now based in London), but there is also a numerical bias in that only 462 seats in Northern Ireland are up for re-election out of 8804 seats in total (there's also 1 seat in Scotland).

– origimbo
May 2 at 17:30





@DaveInCaz This is definitely England only, since the Labour Party aren't registered in Northern Ireland (although they do fellow travel with the SDLP) and the Conservatives never win there. There will be a certain amount of bias in what the Guardian thinks is important (it's a left wing English newspaper now based in London), but there is also a numerical bias in that only 462 seats in Northern Ireland are up for re-election out of 8804 seats in total (there's also 1 seat in Scotland).

– origimbo
May 2 at 17:30













Yes, elaborating on the last paragraph I think the intended referent is Berkshire/Buckinghamshire/Cambridgeshire etc. rather than Yorkshire/Lancashire/Derbyshire.

– rlms
May 2 at 21:53





Yes, elaborating on the last paragraph I think the intended referent is Berkshire/Buckinghamshire/Cambridgeshire etc. rather than Yorkshire/Lancashire/Derbyshire.

– rlms
May 2 at 21:53













"Thus the meaning is party geographic, but mostly demographic." Eh, the intended sense is obviously both together. The etymology is much more straightforward than you're making it: "shires" were the larger land units and so were/are seen as distinguished from the urban centers. Thus, its use for "the countryside".

– lly
May 4 at 8:44





"Thus the meaning is party geographic, but mostly demographic." Eh, the intended sense is obviously both together. The etymology is much more straightforward than you're making it: "shires" were the larger land units and so were/are seen as distinguished from the urban centers. Thus, its use for "the countryside".

– lly
May 4 at 8:44











16














In an electoral context, the shires correspond to the non-metropolitan counties that are colored red on the map below. They are in contrast with the metropolitan counties as defined in the Local Government Act of 1972.



Map of non-metropolitan countries in England




Original (incorrect) answer: If I am not mistaking, the shires in this case are not as convoluted in nature as origimbo's otherwise excellent (and correct) answer might suggest, and simply refer to the dictionary definition:



dictionary definition of Shires






share|improve this answer

























  • Although that definition leaves two questions i) which of the three (or more?) definitions of county do you mean and ii) where do the Midlands start and stop?

    – origimbo
    May 2 at 22:09











  • It's useful to have a simple definition, which is fine. This does not invalidate the more complex definition. Similar to the fact that the UK is composed of three, or four countries, depending on how you count "Englandandwales" as one kingdom or as two countries. It's both; but most people want the simple definition.

    – Rich
    May 2 at 22:56






  • 3





    @origimbo Which definition of "county" doesn't much matter. And it's rather silly of you to demand a precise definition of "Midlands" when you use the equally vague term "south and middle of England" in your own answer. Where does that start or stop?

    – David Richerby
    May 2 at 23:44






  • 1





    @DavidRicherby No major criticism was intended; as with terms like "the Midwest", it's an extremely difficult (but interesting) thing to investigate with government and dictionary definitions not always in line with the map in peoples' heads. fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-states-are-in-the-midwest

    – origimbo
    May 3 at 0:06







  • 1





    If London gets fed up with a hard Brexit and secedes to rejoin the EU, you could call the remaining part "the Shire" :)

    – JollyJoker
    May 3 at 7:34















16














In an electoral context, the shires correspond to the non-metropolitan counties that are colored red on the map below. They are in contrast with the metropolitan counties as defined in the Local Government Act of 1972.



Map of non-metropolitan countries in England




Original (incorrect) answer: If I am not mistaking, the shires in this case are not as convoluted in nature as origimbo's otherwise excellent (and correct) answer might suggest, and simply refer to the dictionary definition:



dictionary definition of Shires






share|improve this answer

























  • Although that definition leaves two questions i) which of the three (or more?) definitions of county do you mean and ii) where do the Midlands start and stop?

    – origimbo
    May 2 at 22:09











  • It's useful to have a simple definition, which is fine. This does not invalidate the more complex definition. Similar to the fact that the UK is composed of three, or four countries, depending on how you count "Englandandwales" as one kingdom or as two countries. It's both; but most people want the simple definition.

    – Rich
    May 2 at 22:56






  • 3





    @origimbo Which definition of "county" doesn't much matter. And it's rather silly of you to demand a precise definition of "Midlands" when you use the equally vague term "south and middle of England" in your own answer. Where does that start or stop?

    – David Richerby
    May 2 at 23:44






  • 1





    @DavidRicherby No major criticism was intended; as with terms like "the Midwest", it's an extremely difficult (but interesting) thing to investigate with government and dictionary definitions not always in line with the map in peoples' heads. fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-states-are-in-the-midwest

    – origimbo
    May 3 at 0:06







  • 1





    If London gets fed up with a hard Brexit and secedes to rejoin the EU, you could call the remaining part "the Shire" :)

    – JollyJoker
    May 3 at 7:34













16












16








16







In an electoral context, the shires correspond to the non-metropolitan counties that are colored red on the map below. They are in contrast with the metropolitan counties as defined in the Local Government Act of 1972.



Map of non-metropolitan countries in England




Original (incorrect) answer: If I am not mistaking, the shires in this case are not as convoluted in nature as origimbo's otherwise excellent (and correct) answer might suggest, and simply refer to the dictionary definition:



dictionary definition of Shires






share|improve this answer















In an electoral context, the shires correspond to the non-metropolitan counties that are colored red on the map below. They are in contrast with the metropolitan counties as defined in the Local Government Act of 1972.



Map of non-metropolitan countries in England




Original (incorrect) answer: If I am not mistaking, the shires in this case are not as convoluted in nature as origimbo's otherwise excellent (and correct) answer might suggest, and simply refer to the dictionary definition:



dictionary definition of Shires







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited May 3 at 10:38

























answered May 2 at 20:19









Denis de BernardyDenis de Bernardy

17.8k34877




17.8k34877












  • Although that definition leaves two questions i) which of the three (or more?) definitions of county do you mean and ii) where do the Midlands start and stop?

    – origimbo
    May 2 at 22:09











  • It's useful to have a simple definition, which is fine. This does not invalidate the more complex definition. Similar to the fact that the UK is composed of three, or four countries, depending on how you count "Englandandwales" as one kingdom or as two countries. It's both; but most people want the simple definition.

    – Rich
    May 2 at 22:56






  • 3





    @origimbo Which definition of "county" doesn't much matter. And it's rather silly of you to demand a precise definition of "Midlands" when you use the equally vague term "south and middle of England" in your own answer. Where does that start or stop?

    – David Richerby
    May 2 at 23:44






  • 1





    @DavidRicherby No major criticism was intended; as with terms like "the Midwest", it's an extremely difficult (but interesting) thing to investigate with government and dictionary definitions not always in line with the map in peoples' heads. fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-states-are-in-the-midwest

    – origimbo
    May 3 at 0:06







  • 1





    If London gets fed up with a hard Brexit and secedes to rejoin the EU, you could call the remaining part "the Shire" :)

    – JollyJoker
    May 3 at 7:34

















  • Although that definition leaves two questions i) which of the three (or more?) definitions of county do you mean and ii) where do the Midlands start and stop?

    – origimbo
    May 2 at 22:09











  • It's useful to have a simple definition, which is fine. This does not invalidate the more complex definition. Similar to the fact that the UK is composed of three, or four countries, depending on how you count "Englandandwales" as one kingdom or as two countries. It's both; but most people want the simple definition.

    – Rich
    May 2 at 22:56






  • 3





    @origimbo Which definition of "county" doesn't much matter. And it's rather silly of you to demand a precise definition of "Midlands" when you use the equally vague term "south and middle of England" in your own answer. Where does that start or stop?

    – David Richerby
    May 2 at 23:44






  • 1





    @DavidRicherby No major criticism was intended; as with terms like "the Midwest", it's an extremely difficult (but interesting) thing to investigate with government and dictionary definitions not always in line with the map in peoples' heads. fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-states-are-in-the-midwest

    – origimbo
    May 3 at 0:06







  • 1





    If London gets fed up with a hard Brexit and secedes to rejoin the EU, you could call the remaining part "the Shire" :)

    – JollyJoker
    May 3 at 7:34
















Although that definition leaves two questions i) which of the three (or more?) definitions of county do you mean and ii) where do the Midlands start and stop?

– origimbo
May 2 at 22:09





Although that definition leaves two questions i) which of the three (or more?) definitions of county do you mean and ii) where do the Midlands start and stop?

– origimbo
May 2 at 22:09













It's useful to have a simple definition, which is fine. This does not invalidate the more complex definition. Similar to the fact that the UK is composed of three, or four countries, depending on how you count "Englandandwales" as one kingdom or as two countries. It's both; but most people want the simple definition.

– Rich
May 2 at 22:56





It's useful to have a simple definition, which is fine. This does not invalidate the more complex definition. Similar to the fact that the UK is composed of three, or four countries, depending on how you count "Englandandwales" as one kingdom or as two countries. It's both; but most people want the simple definition.

– Rich
May 2 at 22:56




3




3





@origimbo Which definition of "county" doesn't much matter. And it's rather silly of you to demand a precise definition of "Midlands" when you use the equally vague term "south and middle of England" in your own answer. Where does that start or stop?

– David Richerby
May 2 at 23:44





@origimbo Which definition of "county" doesn't much matter. And it's rather silly of you to demand a precise definition of "Midlands" when you use the equally vague term "south and middle of England" in your own answer. Where does that start or stop?

– David Richerby
May 2 at 23:44




1




1





@DavidRicherby No major criticism was intended; as with terms like "the Midwest", it's an extremely difficult (but interesting) thing to investigate with government and dictionary definitions not always in line with the map in peoples' heads. fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-states-are-in-the-midwest

– origimbo
May 3 at 0:06






@DavidRicherby No major criticism was intended; as with terms like "the Midwest", it's an extremely difficult (but interesting) thing to investigate with government and dictionary definitions not always in line with the map in peoples' heads. fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-states-are-in-the-midwest

– origimbo
May 3 at 0:06





1




1





If London gets fed up with a hard Brexit and secedes to rejoin the EU, you could call the remaining part "the Shire" :)

– JollyJoker
May 3 at 7:34





If London gets fed up with a hard Brexit and secedes to rejoin the EU, you could call the remaining part "the Shire" :)

– JollyJoker
May 3 at 7:34











6














In the context that The Guardian is using it, the shires are areas whose names end in -shire. For example Wiltshire and Hampshire.



Traditionally most of those areas have been politically conservative and where the Tory party has a strong base. They tend to be more rural. However, the recent failure to deliver Brexit has damaged the Tory party and they seem to be losing support in their traditional heartlands.



So "the shires" is just a shorthand way of addressing that poorly defined collection of traditionally Tory leaning areas, rather than referring to specific geographical locations.






share|improve this answer

























  • Thanks for addressing the sense in which the article used the term.

    – DaveInCaz
    May 3 at 11:45











  • It also includes Kent and Sussex in the usual case

    – Ian Turton
    May 3 at 17:26






  • 2





    I suspect by "poorly" you meant "poorly defined".

    – Michael Kay
    May 4 at 21:52















6














In the context that The Guardian is using it, the shires are areas whose names end in -shire. For example Wiltshire and Hampshire.



Traditionally most of those areas have been politically conservative and where the Tory party has a strong base. They tend to be more rural. However, the recent failure to deliver Brexit has damaged the Tory party and they seem to be losing support in their traditional heartlands.



So "the shires" is just a shorthand way of addressing that poorly defined collection of traditionally Tory leaning areas, rather than referring to specific geographical locations.






share|improve this answer

























  • Thanks for addressing the sense in which the article used the term.

    – DaveInCaz
    May 3 at 11:45











  • It also includes Kent and Sussex in the usual case

    – Ian Turton
    May 3 at 17:26






  • 2





    I suspect by "poorly" you meant "poorly defined".

    – Michael Kay
    May 4 at 21:52













6












6








6







In the context that The Guardian is using it, the shires are areas whose names end in -shire. For example Wiltshire and Hampshire.



Traditionally most of those areas have been politically conservative and where the Tory party has a strong base. They tend to be more rural. However, the recent failure to deliver Brexit has damaged the Tory party and they seem to be losing support in their traditional heartlands.



So "the shires" is just a shorthand way of addressing that poorly defined collection of traditionally Tory leaning areas, rather than referring to specific geographical locations.






share|improve this answer















In the context that The Guardian is using it, the shires are areas whose names end in -shire. For example Wiltshire and Hampshire.



Traditionally most of those areas have been politically conservative and where the Tory party has a strong base. They tend to be more rural. However, the recent failure to deliver Brexit has damaged the Tory party and they seem to be losing support in their traditional heartlands.



So "the shires" is just a shorthand way of addressing that poorly defined collection of traditionally Tory leaning areas, rather than referring to specific geographical locations.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited May 5 at 22:15

























answered May 3 at 10:07









useruser

11.7k32845




11.7k32845












  • Thanks for addressing the sense in which the article used the term.

    – DaveInCaz
    May 3 at 11:45











  • It also includes Kent and Sussex in the usual case

    – Ian Turton
    May 3 at 17:26






  • 2





    I suspect by "poorly" you meant "poorly defined".

    – Michael Kay
    May 4 at 21:52

















  • Thanks for addressing the sense in which the article used the term.

    – DaveInCaz
    May 3 at 11:45











  • It also includes Kent and Sussex in the usual case

    – Ian Turton
    May 3 at 17:26






  • 2





    I suspect by "poorly" you meant "poorly defined".

    – Michael Kay
    May 4 at 21:52
















Thanks for addressing the sense in which the article used the term.

– DaveInCaz
May 3 at 11:45





Thanks for addressing the sense in which the article used the term.

– DaveInCaz
May 3 at 11:45













It also includes Kent and Sussex in the usual case

– Ian Turton
May 3 at 17:26





It also includes Kent and Sussex in the usual case

– Ian Turton
May 3 at 17:26




2




2





I suspect by "poorly" you meant "poorly defined".

– Michael Kay
May 4 at 21:52





I suspect by "poorly" you meant "poorly defined".

– Michael Kay
May 4 at 21:52

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Politics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f41208%2fwhere-are-the-shires-in-the-uk%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Wikipedia:Vital articles Мазмуну Biography - Өмүр баян Philosophy and psychology - Философия жана психология Religion - Дин Social sciences - Коомдук илимдер Language and literature - Тил жана адабият Science - Илим Technology - Технология Arts and recreation - Искусство жана эс алуу History and geography - Тарых жана география Навигация менюсу

Bruxelas-Capital Índice Historia | Composición | Situación lingüística | Clima | Cidades irmandadas | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióneO uso das linguas en Bruxelas e a situación do neerlandés"Rexión de Bruxelas Capital"o orixinalSitio da rexiónPáxina de Bruselas no sitio da Oficina de Promoción Turística de Valonia e BruxelasMapa Interactivo da Rexión de Bruxelas-CapitaleeWorldCat332144929079854441105155190212ID28008674080552-90000 0001 0666 3698n94104302ID540940339365017018237

What should I write in an apology letter, since I have decided not to join a company after accepting an offer letterShould I keep looking after accepting a job offer?What should I do when I've been verbally told I would get an offer letter, but still haven't gotten one after 4 weeks?Do I accept an offer from a company that I am not likely to join?New job hasn't confirmed starting date and I want to give current employer as much notice as possibleHow should I address my manager in my resignation letter?HR delayed background verification, now jobless as resignedNo email communication after accepting a formal written offer. How should I phrase the call?What should I do if after receiving a verbal offer letter I am informed that my written job offer is put on hold due to some internal issues?Should I inform the current employer that I am about to resign within 1-2 weeks since I have signed the offer letter and waiting for visa?What company will do, if I send their offer letter to another company