Where are the “shires” in the UK?What is the name of the tactic that politicians use to bury people with torrent of words?What is the political system where there is a 'friendly' dictatorshipLooking for the correct term for “mutation” of elite phenomenonWhere can I find information on the Troika?What is 'post truth', and why do I hear it all the time?Where will EU money go?Term for the trend where a political party does worse in State elections when holding power FederallyIs there a name for a system where representatives are not party affiliated, but issue affiliated?Is there a website where I can track the passage of a historical Bill?Where have most of the accusations of antisemitism in the labour party come from?
Rounding a number extracted by jq to limit the decimal points
When a land becomes a creature, is it untapped?
How to translate "Keywords" to Spanish "Palabras claves"
Is the expression "To think you would stoop so low" often misused?
Interior smooth regularity
How do employ ' ("prime") in math mode at the correct depth?
Does gravity affect the time evolution of a QM wave function?
Why are solar panels kept tilted?
Anatomically Correct Carnivorous Tree
Why does my circuit work on a breadboard, but not on a perfboard? I am new to soldering
What kind of SATA connector is this?
Conditional probability - sum of dice is even given that at least one is a five
How does emacs `shell-mode` know to prompt for sudo?
What episode was being referenced by this part of Discovery's season 2 episode 13 recap?
Where to find every-day healthy food near Heathrow Airport?
Why is a set not a partition of itself?
Does SQL Server allow (make visible) DDL inside a transaction to the transaction prior to commit?
Are there any established rules for splitting books into parts, chapters, sections etc?
what does a native speaker say when he wanted to leave his work?
Can't find the release for this wiring harness connector
What information do scammers need to withdraw money from an account?
Is taking modulus on both sides of an equation valid?
Why was Thor doubtful about his worthiness to Mjolnir?
Non-deterministic Finite Automata | Sipser Example 1.16
Where are the “shires” in the UK?
What is the name of the tactic that politicians use to bury people with torrent of words?What is the political system where there is a 'friendly' dictatorshipLooking for the correct term for “mutation” of elite phenomenonWhere can I find information on the Troika?What is 'post truth', and why do I hear it all the time?Where will EU money go?Term for the trend where a political party does worse in State elections when holding power FederallyIs there a name for a system where representatives are not party affiliated, but issue affiliated?Is there a website where I can track the passage of a historical Bill?Where have most of the accusations of antisemitism in the labour party come from?
Today's Guardian article, "Local elections: Tories tipped for heavy losses," contains the following statement:
...the Conservatives could lose about 500 seats to the Lib Dems and 300
to Labour. The latter traditionally makes fewer gains in the shires,
where many of the elections are being held.
I've never before heard the expression "the shires". What does this refer to? Is it strictly a geographic reference or does it have a more subtle political or demographic meaning?
This was referring to local council elections affecting English and Northern Irish councils.
united-kingdom terminology
add a comment |
Today's Guardian article, "Local elections: Tories tipped for heavy losses," contains the following statement:
...the Conservatives could lose about 500 seats to the Lib Dems and 300
to Labour. The latter traditionally makes fewer gains in the shires,
where many of the elections are being held.
I've never before heard the expression "the shires". What does this refer to? Is it strictly a geographic reference or does it have a more subtle political or demographic meaning?
This was referring to local council elections affecting English and Northern Irish councils.
united-kingdom terminology
3
It's probably related to this map, which shows which counties end in "-shire", but I don't actually know if there's a subset of that which is "the shires" in this context.
– Bobson
May 2 at 17:01
3
@Bobson Not really, no.
– David Richerby
May 2 at 23:42
add a comment |
Today's Guardian article, "Local elections: Tories tipped for heavy losses," contains the following statement:
...the Conservatives could lose about 500 seats to the Lib Dems and 300
to Labour. The latter traditionally makes fewer gains in the shires,
where many of the elections are being held.
I've never before heard the expression "the shires". What does this refer to? Is it strictly a geographic reference or does it have a more subtle political or demographic meaning?
This was referring to local council elections affecting English and Northern Irish councils.
united-kingdom terminology
Today's Guardian article, "Local elections: Tories tipped for heavy losses," contains the following statement:
...the Conservatives could lose about 500 seats to the Lib Dems and 300
to Labour. The latter traditionally makes fewer gains in the shires,
where many of the elections are being held.
I've never before heard the expression "the shires". What does this refer to? Is it strictly a geographic reference or does it have a more subtle political or demographic meaning?
This was referring to local council elections affecting English and Northern Irish councils.
united-kingdom terminology
united-kingdom terminology
asked May 2 at 16:28
DaveInCazDaveInCaz
31528
31528
3
It's probably related to this map, which shows which counties end in "-shire", but I don't actually know if there's a subset of that which is "the shires" in this context.
– Bobson
May 2 at 17:01
3
@Bobson Not really, no.
– David Richerby
May 2 at 23:42
add a comment |
3
It's probably related to this map, which shows which counties end in "-shire", but I don't actually know if there's a subset of that which is "the shires" in this context.
– Bobson
May 2 at 17:01
3
@Bobson Not really, no.
– David Richerby
May 2 at 23:42
3
3
It's probably related to this map, which shows which counties end in "-shire", but I don't actually know if there's a subset of that which is "the shires" in this context.
– Bobson
May 2 at 17:01
It's probably related to this map, which shows which counties end in "-shire", but I don't actually know if there's a subset of that which is "the shires" in this context.
– Bobson
May 2 at 17:01
3
3
@Bobson Not really, no.
– David Richerby
May 2 at 23:42
@Bobson Not really, no.
– David Richerby
May 2 at 23:42
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
This is actually a surprisingly complicated question to answer, or at least to give specifics for. Briefly, a "shire" is a unit of land division, very similar to "county", the first being Anglo-Saxon, the second Norman. As such, many modern British ceremonial/historic counties have the form city name + shire, for example Nottinghamshire. In 1888 local government in England and Wales was restructured to create administrative counties, many of which retained the relevant ceremonial name. Further reform eventually culminated in division into metropolitan (urban) and non-metropolitan(rural) counties/districts with the rural ones sometimes named after ceremonial counties and the urban ones after towns or cities (this has since been further modified.
As such "shires" here is being used as a short hand for non-metropolitan districts. More specifically, this will be more accurate for rural counties in the south and middle of England, where the Labour Party finds less support, although confusingly, many of these don't actually have names ending in '-shire'. Thus the meaning is party geographic, but mostly demographic.
So the way this term was used in the article, is it implicit that they are referring only to England and not Northern Ireland (which was also referred to earlier in the article)? And if so does this show some sort of bias?
– DaveInCaz
May 2 at 17:19
7
@DaveInCaz This is definitely England only, since the Labour Party aren't registered in Northern Ireland (although they do fellow travel with the SDLP) and the Conservatives never win there. There will be a certain amount of bias in what the Guardian thinks is important (it's a left wing English newspaper now based in London), but there is also a numerical bias in that only 462 seats in Northern Ireland are up for re-election out of 8804 seats in total (there's also 1 seat in Scotland).
– origimbo
May 2 at 17:30
Yes, elaborating on the last paragraph I think the intended referent is Berkshire/Buckinghamshire/Cambridgeshire etc. rather than Yorkshire/Lancashire/Derbyshire.
– rlms
May 2 at 21:53
"Thus the meaning is party geographic, but mostly demographic." Eh, the intended sense is obviously both together. The etymology is much more straightforward than you're making it: "shires" were the larger land units and so were/are seen as distinguished from the urban centers. Thus, its use for "the countryside".
– lly
May 4 at 8:44
add a comment |
In an electoral context, the shires correspond to the non-metropolitan counties that are colored red on the map below. They are in contrast with the metropolitan counties as defined in the Local Government Act of 1972.
Original (incorrect) answer: If I am not mistaking, the shires in this case are not as convoluted in nature as origimbo's otherwise excellent (and correct) answer might suggest, and simply refer to the dictionary definition:
Although that definition leaves two questions i) which of the three (or more?) definitions of county do you mean and ii) where do the Midlands start and stop?
– origimbo
May 2 at 22:09
It's useful to have a simple definition, which is fine. This does not invalidate the more complex definition. Similar to the fact that the UK is composed of three, or four countries, depending on how you count "Englandandwales" as one kingdom or as two countries. It's both; but most people want the simple definition.
– Rich
May 2 at 22:56
3
@origimbo Which definition of "county" doesn't much matter. And it's rather silly of you to demand a precise definition of "Midlands" when you use the equally vague term "south and middle of England" in your own answer. Where does that start or stop?
– David Richerby
May 2 at 23:44
1
@DavidRicherby No major criticism was intended; as with terms like "the Midwest", it's an extremely difficult (but interesting) thing to investigate with government and dictionary definitions not always in line with the map in peoples' heads. fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-states-are-in-the-midwest
– origimbo
May 3 at 0:06
1
If London gets fed up with a hard Brexit and secedes to rejoin the EU, you could call the remaining part "the Shire" :)
– JollyJoker
May 3 at 7:34
|
show 8 more comments
In the context that The Guardian is using it, the shires are areas whose names end in -shire. For example Wiltshire and Hampshire.
Traditionally most of those areas have been politically conservative and where the Tory party has a strong base. They tend to be more rural. However, the recent failure to deliver Brexit has damaged the Tory party and they seem to be losing support in their traditional heartlands.
So "the shires" is just a shorthand way of addressing that poorly defined collection of traditionally Tory leaning areas, rather than referring to specific geographical locations.
Thanks for addressing the sense in which the article used the term.
– DaveInCaz
May 3 at 11:45
It also includes Kent and Sussex in the usual case
– Ian Turton
May 3 at 17:26
2
I suspect by "poorly" you meant "poorly defined".
– Michael Kay
May 4 at 21:52
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "475"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f41208%2fwhere-are-the-shires-in-the-uk%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
This is actually a surprisingly complicated question to answer, or at least to give specifics for. Briefly, a "shire" is a unit of land division, very similar to "county", the first being Anglo-Saxon, the second Norman. As such, many modern British ceremonial/historic counties have the form city name + shire, for example Nottinghamshire. In 1888 local government in England and Wales was restructured to create administrative counties, many of which retained the relevant ceremonial name. Further reform eventually culminated in division into metropolitan (urban) and non-metropolitan(rural) counties/districts with the rural ones sometimes named after ceremonial counties and the urban ones after towns or cities (this has since been further modified.
As such "shires" here is being used as a short hand for non-metropolitan districts. More specifically, this will be more accurate for rural counties in the south and middle of England, where the Labour Party finds less support, although confusingly, many of these don't actually have names ending in '-shire'. Thus the meaning is party geographic, but mostly demographic.
So the way this term was used in the article, is it implicit that they are referring only to England and not Northern Ireland (which was also referred to earlier in the article)? And if so does this show some sort of bias?
– DaveInCaz
May 2 at 17:19
7
@DaveInCaz This is definitely England only, since the Labour Party aren't registered in Northern Ireland (although they do fellow travel with the SDLP) and the Conservatives never win there. There will be a certain amount of bias in what the Guardian thinks is important (it's a left wing English newspaper now based in London), but there is also a numerical bias in that only 462 seats in Northern Ireland are up for re-election out of 8804 seats in total (there's also 1 seat in Scotland).
– origimbo
May 2 at 17:30
Yes, elaborating on the last paragraph I think the intended referent is Berkshire/Buckinghamshire/Cambridgeshire etc. rather than Yorkshire/Lancashire/Derbyshire.
– rlms
May 2 at 21:53
"Thus the meaning is party geographic, but mostly demographic." Eh, the intended sense is obviously both together. The etymology is much more straightforward than you're making it: "shires" were the larger land units and so were/are seen as distinguished from the urban centers. Thus, its use for "the countryside".
– lly
May 4 at 8:44
add a comment |
This is actually a surprisingly complicated question to answer, or at least to give specifics for. Briefly, a "shire" is a unit of land division, very similar to "county", the first being Anglo-Saxon, the second Norman. As such, many modern British ceremonial/historic counties have the form city name + shire, for example Nottinghamshire. In 1888 local government in England and Wales was restructured to create administrative counties, many of which retained the relevant ceremonial name. Further reform eventually culminated in division into metropolitan (urban) and non-metropolitan(rural) counties/districts with the rural ones sometimes named after ceremonial counties and the urban ones after towns or cities (this has since been further modified.
As such "shires" here is being used as a short hand for non-metropolitan districts. More specifically, this will be more accurate for rural counties in the south and middle of England, where the Labour Party finds less support, although confusingly, many of these don't actually have names ending in '-shire'. Thus the meaning is party geographic, but mostly demographic.
So the way this term was used in the article, is it implicit that they are referring only to England and not Northern Ireland (which was also referred to earlier in the article)? And if so does this show some sort of bias?
– DaveInCaz
May 2 at 17:19
7
@DaveInCaz This is definitely England only, since the Labour Party aren't registered in Northern Ireland (although they do fellow travel with the SDLP) and the Conservatives never win there. There will be a certain amount of bias in what the Guardian thinks is important (it's a left wing English newspaper now based in London), but there is also a numerical bias in that only 462 seats in Northern Ireland are up for re-election out of 8804 seats in total (there's also 1 seat in Scotland).
– origimbo
May 2 at 17:30
Yes, elaborating on the last paragraph I think the intended referent is Berkshire/Buckinghamshire/Cambridgeshire etc. rather than Yorkshire/Lancashire/Derbyshire.
– rlms
May 2 at 21:53
"Thus the meaning is party geographic, but mostly demographic." Eh, the intended sense is obviously both together. The etymology is much more straightforward than you're making it: "shires" were the larger land units and so were/are seen as distinguished from the urban centers. Thus, its use for "the countryside".
– lly
May 4 at 8:44
add a comment |
This is actually a surprisingly complicated question to answer, or at least to give specifics for. Briefly, a "shire" is a unit of land division, very similar to "county", the first being Anglo-Saxon, the second Norman. As such, many modern British ceremonial/historic counties have the form city name + shire, for example Nottinghamshire. In 1888 local government in England and Wales was restructured to create administrative counties, many of which retained the relevant ceremonial name. Further reform eventually culminated in division into metropolitan (urban) and non-metropolitan(rural) counties/districts with the rural ones sometimes named after ceremonial counties and the urban ones after towns or cities (this has since been further modified.
As such "shires" here is being used as a short hand for non-metropolitan districts. More specifically, this will be more accurate for rural counties in the south and middle of England, where the Labour Party finds less support, although confusingly, many of these don't actually have names ending in '-shire'. Thus the meaning is party geographic, but mostly demographic.
This is actually a surprisingly complicated question to answer, or at least to give specifics for. Briefly, a "shire" is a unit of land division, very similar to "county", the first being Anglo-Saxon, the second Norman. As such, many modern British ceremonial/historic counties have the form city name + shire, for example Nottinghamshire. In 1888 local government in England and Wales was restructured to create administrative counties, many of which retained the relevant ceremonial name. Further reform eventually culminated in division into metropolitan (urban) and non-metropolitan(rural) counties/districts with the rural ones sometimes named after ceremonial counties and the urban ones after towns or cities (this has since been further modified.
As such "shires" here is being used as a short hand for non-metropolitan districts. More specifically, this will be more accurate for rural counties in the south and middle of England, where the Labour Party finds less support, although confusingly, many of these don't actually have names ending in '-shire'. Thus the meaning is party geographic, but mostly demographic.
answered May 2 at 17:01
origimboorigimbo
14.5k23456
14.5k23456
So the way this term was used in the article, is it implicit that they are referring only to England and not Northern Ireland (which was also referred to earlier in the article)? And if so does this show some sort of bias?
– DaveInCaz
May 2 at 17:19
7
@DaveInCaz This is definitely England only, since the Labour Party aren't registered in Northern Ireland (although they do fellow travel with the SDLP) and the Conservatives never win there. There will be a certain amount of bias in what the Guardian thinks is important (it's a left wing English newspaper now based in London), but there is also a numerical bias in that only 462 seats in Northern Ireland are up for re-election out of 8804 seats in total (there's also 1 seat in Scotland).
– origimbo
May 2 at 17:30
Yes, elaborating on the last paragraph I think the intended referent is Berkshire/Buckinghamshire/Cambridgeshire etc. rather than Yorkshire/Lancashire/Derbyshire.
– rlms
May 2 at 21:53
"Thus the meaning is party geographic, but mostly demographic." Eh, the intended sense is obviously both together. The etymology is much more straightforward than you're making it: "shires" were the larger land units and so were/are seen as distinguished from the urban centers. Thus, its use for "the countryside".
– lly
May 4 at 8:44
add a comment |
So the way this term was used in the article, is it implicit that they are referring only to England and not Northern Ireland (which was also referred to earlier in the article)? And if so does this show some sort of bias?
– DaveInCaz
May 2 at 17:19
7
@DaveInCaz This is definitely England only, since the Labour Party aren't registered in Northern Ireland (although they do fellow travel with the SDLP) and the Conservatives never win there. There will be a certain amount of bias in what the Guardian thinks is important (it's a left wing English newspaper now based in London), but there is also a numerical bias in that only 462 seats in Northern Ireland are up for re-election out of 8804 seats in total (there's also 1 seat in Scotland).
– origimbo
May 2 at 17:30
Yes, elaborating on the last paragraph I think the intended referent is Berkshire/Buckinghamshire/Cambridgeshire etc. rather than Yorkshire/Lancashire/Derbyshire.
– rlms
May 2 at 21:53
"Thus the meaning is party geographic, but mostly demographic." Eh, the intended sense is obviously both together. The etymology is much more straightforward than you're making it: "shires" were the larger land units and so were/are seen as distinguished from the urban centers. Thus, its use for "the countryside".
– lly
May 4 at 8:44
So the way this term was used in the article, is it implicit that they are referring only to England and not Northern Ireland (which was also referred to earlier in the article)? And if so does this show some sort of bias?
– DaveInCaz
May 2 at 17:19
So the way this term was used in the article, is it implicit that they are referring only to England and not Northern Ireland (which was also referred to earlier in the article)? And if so does this show some sort of bias?
– DaveInCaz
May 2 at 17:19
7
7
@DaveInCaz This is definitely England only, since the Labour Party aren't registered in Northern Ireland (although they do fellow travel with the SDLP) and the Conservatives never win there. There will be a certain amount of bias in what the Guardian thinks is important (it's a left wing English newspaper now based in London), but there is also a numerical bias in that only 462 seats in Northern Ireland are up for re-election out of 8804 seats in total (there's also 1 seat in Scotland).
– origimbo
May 2 at 17:30
@DaveInCaz This is definitely England only, since the Labour Party aren't registered in Northern Ireland (although they do fellow travel with the SDLP) and the Conservatives never win there. There will be a certain amount of bias in what the Guardian thinks is important (it's a left wing English newspaper now based in London), but there is also a numerical bias in that only 462 seats in Northern Ireland are up for re-election out of 8804 seats in total (there's also 1 seat in Scotland).
– origimbo
May 2 at 17:30
Yes, elaborating on the last paragraph I think the intended referent is Berkshire/Buckinghamshire/Cambridgeshire etc. rather than Yorkshire/Lancashire/Derbyshire.
– rlms
May 2 at 21:53
Yes, elaborating on the last paragraph I think the intended referent is Berkshire/Buckinghamshire/Cambridgeshire etc. rather than Yorkshire/Lancashire/Derbyshire.
– rlms
May 2 at 21:53
"Thus the meaning is party geographic, but mostly demographic." Eh, the intended sense is obviously both together. The etymology is much more straightforward than you're making it: "shires" were the larger land units and so were/are seen as distinguished from the urban centers. Thus, its use for "the countryside".
– lly
May 4 at 8:44
"Thus the meaning is party geographic, but mostly demographic." Eh, the intended sense is obviously both together. The etymology is much more straightforward than you're making it: "shires" were the larger land units and so were/are seen as distinguished from the urban centers. Thus, its use for "the countryside".
– lly
May 4 at 8:44
add a comment |
In an electoral context, the shires correspond to the non-metropolitan counties that are colored red on the map below. They are in contrast with the metropolitan counties as defined in the Local Government Act of 1972.
Original (incorrect) answer: If I am not mistaking, the shires in this case are not as convoluted in nature as origimbo's otherwise excellent (and correct) answer might suggest, and simply refer to the dictionary definition:
Although that definition leaves two questions i) which of the three (or more?) definitions of county do you mean and ii) where do the Midlands start and stop?
– origimbo
May 2 at 22:09
It's useful to have a simple definition, which is fine. This does not invalidate the more complex definition. Similar to the fact that the UK is composed of three, or four countries, depending on how you count "Englandandwales" as one kingdom or as two countries. It's both; but most people want the simple definition.
– Rich
May 2 at 22:56
3
@origimbo Which definition of "county" doesn't much matter. And it's rather silly of you to demand a precise definition of "Midlands" when you use the equally vague term "south and middle of England" in your own answer. Where does that start or stop?
– David Richerby
May 2 at 23:44
1
@DavidRicherby No major criticism was intended; as with terms like "the Midwest", it's an extremely difficult (but interesting) thing to investigate with government and dictionary definitions not always in line with the map in peoples' heads. fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-states-are-in-the-midwest
– origimbo
May 3 at 0:06
1
If London gets fed up with a hard Brexit and secedes to rejoin the EU, you could call the remaining part "the Shire" :)
– JollyJoker
May 3 at 7:34
|
show 8 more comments
In an electoral context, the shires correspond to the non-metropolitan counties that are colored red on the map below. They are in contrast with the metropolitan counties as defined in the Local Government Act of 1972.
Original (incorrect) answer: If I am not mistaking, the shires in this case are not as convoluted in nature as origimbo's otherwise excellent (and correct) answer might suggest, and simply refer to the dictionary definition:
Although that definition leaves two questions i) which of the three (or more?) definitions of county do you mean and ii) where do the Midlands start and stop?
– origimbo
May 2 at 22:09
It's useful to have a simple definition, which is fine. This does not invalidate the more complex definition. Similar to the fact that the UK is composed of three, or four countries, depending on how you count "Englandandwales" as one kingdom or as two countries. It's both; but most people want the simple definition.
– Rich
May 2 at 22:56
3
@origimbo Which definition of "county" doesn't much matter. And it's rather silly of you to demand a precise definition of "Midlands" when you use the equally vague term "south and middle of England" in your own answer. Where does that start or stop?
– David Richerby
May 2 at 23:44
1
@DavidRicherby No major criticism was intended; as with terms like "the Midwest", it's an extremely difficult (but interesting) thing to investigate with government and dictionary definitions not always in line with the map in peoples' heads. fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-states-are-in-the-midwest
– origimbo
May 3 at 0:06
1
If London gets fed up with a hard Brexit and secedes to rejoin the EU, you could call the remaining part "the Shire" :)
– JollyJoker
May 3 at 7:34
|
show 8 more comments
In an electoral context, the shires correspond to the non-metropolitan counties that are colored red on the map below. They are in contrast with the metropolitan counties as defined in the Local Government Act of 1972.
Original (incorrect) answer: If I am not mistaking, the shires in this case are not as convoluted in nature as origimbo's otherwise excellent (and correct) answer might suggest, and simply refer to the dictionary definition:
In an electoral context, the shires correspond to the non-metropolitan counties that are colored red on the map below. They are in contrast with the metropolitan counties as defined in the Local Government Act of 1972.
Original (incorrect) answer: If I am not mistaking, the shires in this case are not as convoluted in nature as origimbo's otherwise excellent (and correct) answer might suggest, and simply refer to the dictionary definition:
edited May 3 at 10:38
answered May 2 at 20:19
Denis de BernardyDenis de Bernardy
17.8k34877
17.8k34877
Although that definition leaves two questions i) which of the three (or more?) definitions of county do you mean and ii) where do the Midlands start and stop?
– origimbo
May 2 at 22:09
It's useful to have a simple definition, which is fine. This does not invalidate the more complex definition. Similar to the fact that the UK is composed of three, or four countries, depending on how you count "Englandandwales" as one kingdom or as two countries. It's both; but most people want the simple definition.
– Rich
May 2 at 22:56
3
@origimbo Which definition of "county" doesn't much matter. And it's rather silly of you to demand a precise definition of "Midlands" when you use the equally vague term "south and middle of England" in your own answer. Where does that start or stop?
– David Richerby
May 2 at 23:44
1
@DavidRicherby No major criticism was intended; as with terms like "the Midwest", it's an extremely difficult (but interesting) thing to investigate with government and dictionary definitions not always in line with the map in peoples' heads. fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-states-are-in-the-midwest
– origimbo
May 3 at 0:06
1
If London gets fed up with a hard Brexit and secedes to rejoin the EU, you could call the remaining part "the Shire" :)
– JollyJoker
May 3 at 7:34
|
show 8 more comments
Although that definition leaves two questions i) which of the three (or more?) definitions of county do you mean and ii) where do the Midlands start and stop?
– origimbo
May 2 at 22:09
It's useful to have a simple definition, which is fine. This does not invalidate the more complex definition. Similar to the fact that the UK is composed of three, or four countries, depending on how you count "Englandandwales" as one kingdom or as two countries. It's both; but most people want the simple definition.
– Rich
May 2 at 22:56
3
@origimbo Which definition of "county" doesn't much matter. And it's rather silly of you to demand a precise definition of "Midlands" when you use the equally vague term "south and middle of England" in your own answer. Where does that start or stop?
– David Richerby
May 2 at 23:44
1
@DavidRicherby No major criticism was intended; as with terms like "the Midwest", it's an extremely difficult (but interesting) thing to investigate with government and dictionary definitions not always in line with the map in peoples' heads. fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-states-are-in-the-midwest
– origimbo
May 3 at 0:06
1
If London gets fed up with a hard Brexit and secedes to rejoin the EU, you could call the remaining part "the Shire" :)
– JollyJoker
May 3 at 7:34
Although that definition leaves two questions i) which of the three (or more?) definitions of county do you mean and ii) where do the Midlands start and stop?
– origimbo
May 2 at 22:09
Although that definition leaves two questions i) which of the three (or more?) definitions of county do you mean and ii) where do the Midlands start and stop?
– origimbo
May 2 at 22:09
It's useful to have a simple definition, which is fine. This does not invalidate the more complex definition. Similar to the fact that the UK is composed of three, or four countries, depending on how you count "Englandandwales" as one kingdom or as two countries. It's both; but most people want the simple definition.
– Rich
May 2 at 22:56
It's useful to have a simple definition, which is fine. This does not invalidate the more complex definition. Similar to the fact that the UK is composed of three, or four countries, depending on how you count "Englandandwales" as one kingdom or as two countries. It's both; but most people want the simple definition.
– Rich
May 2 at 22:56
3
3
@origimbo Which definition of "county" doesn't much matter. And it's rather silly of you to demand a precise definition of "Midlands" when you use the equally vague term "south and middle of England" in your own answer. Where does that start or stop?
– David Richerby
May 2 at 23:44
@origimbo Which definition of "county" doesn't much matter. And it's rather silly of you to demand a precise definition of "Midlands" when you use the equally vague term "south and middle of England" in your own answer. Where does that start or stop?
– David Richerby
May 2 at 23:44
1
1
@DavidRicherby No major criticism was intended; as with terms like "the Midwest", it's an extremely difficult (but interesting) thing to investigate with government and dictionary definitions not always in line with the map in peoples' heads. fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-states-are-in-the-midwest
– origimbo
May 3 at 0:06
@DavidRicherby No major criticism was intended; as with terms like "the Midwest", it's an extremely difficult (but interesting) thing to investigate with government and dictionary definitions not always in line with the map in peoples' heads. fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-states-are-in-the-midwest
– origimbo
May 3 at 0:06
1
1
If London gets fed up with a hard Brexit and secedes to rejoin the EU, you could call the remaining part "the Shire" :)
– JollyJoker
May 3 at 7:34
If London gets fed up with a hard Brexit and secedes to rejoin the EU, you could call the remaining part "the Shire" :)
– JollyJoker
May 3 at 7:34
|
show 8 more comments
In the context that The Guardian is using it, the shires are areas whose names end in -shire. For example Wiltshire and Hampshire.
Traditionally most of those areas have been politically conservative and where the Tory party has a strong base. They tend to be more rural. However, the recent failure to deliver Brexit has damaged the Tory party and they seem to be losing support in their traditional heartlands.
So "the shires" is just a shorthand way of addressing that poorly defined collection of traditionally Tory leaning areas, rather than referring to specific geographical locations.
Thanks for addressing the sense in which the article used the term.
– DaveInCaz
May 3 at 11:45
It also includes Kent and Sussex in the usual case
– Ian Turton
May 3 at 17:26
2
I suspect by "poorly" you meant "poorly defined".
– Michael Kay
May 4 at 21:52
add a comment |
In the context that The Guardian is using it, the shires are areas whose names end in -shire. For example Wiltshire and Hampshire.
Traditionally most of those areas have been politically conservative and where the Tory party has a strong base. They tend to be more rural. However, the recent failure to deliver Brexit has damaged the Tory party and they seem to be losing support in their traditional heartlands.
So "the shires" is just a shorthand way of addressing that poorly defined collection of traditionally Tory leaning areas, rather than referring to specific geographical locations.
Thanks for addressing the sense in which the article used the term.
– DaveInCaz
May 3 at 11:45
It also includes Kent and Sussex in the usual case
– Ian Turton
May 3 at 17:26
2
I suspect by "poorly" you meant "poorly defined".
– Michael Kay
May 4 at 21:52
add a comment |
In the context that The Guardian is using it, the shires are areas whose names end in -shire. For example Wiltshire and Hampshire.
Traditionally most of those areas have been politically conservative and where the Tory party has a strong base. They tend to be more rural. However, the recent failure to deliver Brexit has damaged the Tory party and they seem to be losing support in their traditional heartlands.
So "the shires" is just a shorthand way of addressing that poorly defined collection of traditionally Tory leaning areas, rather than referring to specific geographical locations.
In the context that The Guardian is using it, the shires are areas whose names end in -shire. For example Wiltshire and Hampshire.
Traditionally most of those areas have been politically conservative and where the Tory party has a strong base. They tend to be more rural. However, the recent failure to deliver Brexit has damaged the Tory party and they seem to be losing support in their traditional heartlands.
So "the shires" is just a shorthand way of addressing that poorly defined collection of traditionally Tory leaning areas, rather than referring to specific geographical locations.
edited May 5 at 22:15
answered May 3 at 10:07
useruser
11.7k32845
11.7k32845
Thanks for addressing the sense in which the article used the term.
– DaveInCaz
May 3 at 11:45
It also includes Kent and Sussex in the usual case
– Ian Turton
May 3 at 17:26
2
I suspect by "poorly" you meant "poorly defined".
– Michael Kay
May 4 at 21:52
add a comment |
Thanks for addressing the sense in which the article used the term.
– DaveInCaz
May 3 at 11:45
It also includes Kent and Sussex in the usual case
– Ian Turton
May 3 at 17:26
2
I suspect by "poorly" you meant "poorly defined".
– Michael Kay
May 4 at 21:52
Thanks for addressing the sense in which the article used the term.
– DaveInCaz
May 3 at 11:45
Thanks for addressing the sense in which the article used the term.
– DaveInCaz
May 3 at 11:45
It also includes Kent and Sussex in the usual case
– Ian Turton
May 3 at 17:26
It also includes Kent and Sussex in the usual case
– Ian Turton
May 3 at 17:26
2
2
I suspect by "poorly" you meant "poorly defined".
– Michael Kay
May 4 at 21:52
I suspect by "poorly" you meant "poorly defined".
– Michael Kay
May 4 at 21:52
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Politics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f41208%2fwhere-are-the-shires-in-the-uk%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
It's probably related to this map, which shows which counties end in "-shire", but I don't actually know if there's a subset of that which is "the shires" in this context.
– Bobson
May 2 at 17:01
3
@Bobson Not really, no.
– David Richerby
May 2 at 23:42