Linux: Bridge two NICs and route traffic through VPN tunnel except specific destinations and portsiptables port forwardingftp tls firewalled :(iptables questionPort foreword + openVPN + iptables?Help With IPTables: Traffic Forced To Specific NIC?Redirecting IP traffic to tun0 using iptablesRHEL 6 Having issues forwarding port 80 to port 8080IPtables on Linux for mysql server private interfacespecific default route for NAT clients different from server itselfVPN Router does not reply to ARP Requests

Make all the squares explode

How to slow yourself down (for playing nice with others)

Do atomic orbitals "pulse" in time?

How to make a language evolve quickly?

Why was castling bad for white in this game, and engine strongly prefered trading queens?

51% attack - apparently very easy? refering to CZ's "rollback btc chain" - How to make sure such corruptible scenario can never happen so easily?

How to get reference to Component from inside an event method

Can 'sudo apt-get remove [write]' destroy my Ubuntu?

What's the word for the soldier salute?

On what legal basis did the UK remove the 'European Union' from its passport?

Was there ever any real use for a 6800-based Apple I?

How can a Lich look like a human without magic?

What does the expression "right on the tip of my tongue" mean?

What is Plautus’s pun about frustum and frustrum?

How are Core iX names like Core i5, i7 related to Haswell, Ivy Bridge?

How can dragons propel their breath attacks to a long distance

Why doesn't Rocket Lab use a solid stage?

Why did the ICC decide not to probe alleged US atrocities in Afghanistan?

What are the implications of the new alleged key recovery attack preprint on SIMON?

Usefulness of complex chord names?

As programers say: Strive to be lazy

Extracting sublists that contain similar elements

How to minimise the cost of guessing a number in a high/low guess game?

How do I compare the result of "1d20+x, with advantage" to "1d20+y, without advantage", assuming x < y?



Linux: Bridge two NICs and route traffic through VPN tunnel except specific destinations and ports


iptables port forwardingftp tls firewalled :(iptables questionPort foreword + openVPN + iptables?Help With IPTables: Traffic Forced To Specific NIC?Redirecting IP traffic to tun0 using iptablesRHEL 6 Having issues forwarding port 80 to port 8080IPtables on Linux for mysql server private interfacespecific default route for NAT clients different from server itselfVPN Router does not reply to ARP Requests






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








0















I have a Linux PC (Debian Wheezy) with two Ethernet adapters. Adapter eth0 is connected to the Internet (modem/router/DHCP/firewall thingy) and eth1 is connected to an WiFi access point. All other computers use WiFi and connect to that AP.



I want to configure the network so that all traffic from the clients behind the AP is passed through an OpenVPN tunnel on tun0. However, I need port 587 and the IP ranges 192.168.0.0/16 and 10.0.0.0/24 to always get passed through eth0.



I tried to build something with iptables but I'm having little success. Nothing is logged anywhere for some reason, so I am not sure how to start debugging. To be honest I am not even really sure what I am doing. English also isn't my native language so that makes reading a documentation difficult.



The following is what I have right now. Would a kind person tell me what I am doing wrong? Is this a wrong approach?



sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.tun0.rp_filter=2
iptables -F
iptables -X LOGDROP
iptables -t mangle -F

iptables -N LOGDROP
iptables -A LOGDROP -m limit --limit 5/m --limit-burst 10 -j LOG
iptables -A LOGDROP -j DROP

iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth0 -d 192.168.0.0/16 -j MARK --set-mark 1
iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth0 -d 10.0.0.0/24 -j MARK --set-mark 1
iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 587 -j MARK --set-mark 1
iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth0 -j MARK --set-mark 2

iptables -I FORWARD -m state --state INVALID -j LOGDROP
iptables -I FORWARD -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT

iptables -A FORWARD -m mark --mark 1 --in-interface eth1 --out-interface eth0 -j ACCEPT
iptables -A FORWARD -m mark --mark 2 --in-interface eth1 --out-interface tun0 -j ACCEPT

iptables -A FORWARD --in-interface eth0 --out-interface eth1 -d 192.168.0.0/16 -j ACCEPT
iptables -A FORWARD --in-interface eth0 --out-interface eth1 -d 10.0.0.0/24 -j ACCEPT

iptables -A FORWARD -j LOGDROP









share|improve this question




























    0















    I have a Linux PC (Debian Wheezy) with two Ethernet adapters. Adapter eth0 is connected to the Internet (modem/router/DHCP/firewall thingy) and eth1 is connected to an WiFi access point. All other computers use WiFi and connect to that AP.



    I want to configure the network so that all traffic from the clients behind the AP is passed through an OpenVPN tunnel on tun0. However, I need port 587 and the IP ranges 192.168.0.0/16 and 10.0.0.0/24 to always get passed through eth0.



    I tried to build something with iptables but I'm having little success. Nothing is logged anywhere for some reason, so I am not sure how to start debugging. To be honest I am not even really sure what I am doing. English also isn't my native language so that makes reading a documentation difficult.



    The following is what I have right now. Would a kind person tell me what I am doing wrong? Is this a wrong approach?



    sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.tun0.rp_filter=2
    iptables -F
    iptables -X LOGDROP
    iptables -t mangle -F

    iptables -N LOGDROP
    iptables -A LOGDROP -m limit --limit 5/m --limit-burst 10 -j LOG
    iptables -A LOGDROP -j DROP

    iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth0 -d 192.168.0.0/16 -j MARK --set-mark 1
    iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth0 -d 10.0.0.0/24 -j MARK --set-mark 1
    iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 587 -j MARK --set-mark 1
    iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth0 -j MARK --set-mark 2

    iptables -I FORWARD -m state --state INVALID -j LOGDROP
    iptables -I FORWARD -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT

    iptables -A FORWARD -m mark --mark 1 --in-interface eth1 --out-interface eth0 -j ACCEPT
    iptables -A FORWARD -m mark --mark 2 --in-interface eth1 --out-interface tun0 -j ACCEPT

    iptables -A FORWARD --in-interface eth0 --out-interface eth1 -d 192.168.0.0/16 -j ACCEPT
    iptables -A FORWARD --in-interface eth0 --out-interface eth1 -d 10.0.0.0/24 -j ACCEPT

    iptables -A FORWARD -j LOGDROP









    share|improve this question
























      0












      0








      0








      I have a Linux PC (Debian Wheezy) with two Ethernet adapters. Adapter eth0 is connected to the Internet (modem/router/DHCP/firewall thingy) and eth1 is connected to an WiFi access point. All other computers use WiFi and connect to that AP.



      I want to configure the network so that all traffic from the clients behind the AP is passed through an OpenVPN tunnel on tun0. However, I need port 587 and the IP ranges 192.168.0.0/16 and 10.0.0.0/24 to always get passed through eth0.



      I tried to build something with iptables but I'm having little success. Nothing is logged anywhere for some reason, so I am not sure how to start debugging. To be honest I am not even really sure what I am doing. English also isn't my native language so that makes reading a documentation difficult.



      The following is what I have right now. Would a kind person tell me what I am doing wrong? Is this a wrong approach?



      sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.tun0.rp_filter=2
      iptables -F
      iptables -X LOGDROP
      iptables -t mangle -F

      iptables -N LOGDROP
      iptables -A LOGDROP -m limit --limit 5/m --limit-burst 10 -j LOG
      iptables -A LOGDROP -j DROP

      iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth0 -d 192.168.0.0/16 -j MARK --set-mark 1
      iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth0 -d 10.0.0.0/24 -j MARK --set-mark 1
      iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 587 -j MARK --set-mark 1
      iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth0 -j MARK --set-mark 2

      iptables -I FORWARD -m state --state INVALID -j LOGDROP
      iptables -I FORWARD -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT

      iptables -A FORWARD -m mark --mark 1 --in-interface eth1 --out-interface eth0 -j ACCEPT
      iptables -A FORWARD -m mark --mark 2 --in-interface eth1 --out-interface tun0 -j ACCEPT

      iptables -A FORWARD --in-interface eth0 --out-interface eth1 -d 192.168.0.0/16 -j ACCEPT
      iptables -A FORWARD --in-interface eth0 --out-interface eth1 -d 10.0.0.0/24 -j ACCEPT

      iptables -A FORWARD -j LOGDROP









      share|improve this question














      I have a Linux PC (Debian Wheezy) with two Ethernet adapters. Adapter eth0 is connected to the Internet (modem/router/DHCP/firewall thingy) and eth1 is connected to an WiFi access point. All other computers use WiFi and connect to that AP.



      I want to configure the network so that all traffic from the clients behind the AP is passed through an OpenVPN tunnel on tun0. However, I need port 587 and the IP ranges 192.168.0.0/16 and 10.0.0.0/24 to always get passed through eth0.



      I tried to build something with iptables but I'm having little success. Nothing is logged anywhere for some reason, so I am not sure how to start debugging. To be honest I am not even really sure what I am doing. English also isn't my native language so that makes reading a documentation difficult.



      The following is what I have right now. Would a kind person tell me what I am doing wrong? Is this a wrong approach?



      sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.tun0.rp_filter=2
      iptables -F
      iptables -X LOGDROP
      iptables -t mangle -F

      iptables -N LOGDROP
      iptables -A LOGDROP -m limit --limit 5/m --limit-burst 10 -j LOG
      iptables -A LOGDROP -j DROP

      iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth0 -d 192.168.0.0/16 -j MARK --set-mark 1
      iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth0 -d 10.0.0.0/24 -j MARK --set-mark 1
      iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 587 -j MARK --set-mark 1
      iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -i eth0 -j MARK --set-mark 2

      iptables -I FORWARD -m state --state INVALID -j LOGDROP
      iptables -I FORWARD -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT

      iptables -A FORWARD -m mark --mark 1 --in-interface eth1 --out-interface eth0 -j ACCEPT
      iptables -A FORWARD -m mark --mark 2 --in-interface eth1 --out-interface tun0 -j ACCEPT

      iptables -A FORWARD --in-interface eth0 --out-interface eth1 -d 192.168.0.0/16 -j ACCEPT
      iptables -A FORWARD --in-interface eth0 --out-interface eth1 -d 10.0.0.0/24 -j ACCEPT

      iptables -A FORWARD -j LOGDROP






      linux iptables routing openvpn






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Feb 12 '15 at 23:41









      taka3taka3

      11




      11




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          You're right about marking packets using the firewall, but you should not be routing them at that level — use multiple routing tables.



          First, set up your main routing table so that it routes through eth0:



          ip route add default via XXXX dev eth0


          Once the tunnel is up, set up a secondary routing table that routes through tun0:



          ip route add default via YYYY dev tun0 table 42


          Now mark packets destined to tun0:



          iptables -t mange -A PREROUTING ... --set-mark 54


          and set up a routing rule so that marked packets go through table 42:



          ip rule add priority 100 fwmark 54 table 42


          In order to ensure that packets don't go through eth0 when the tunnel is down, you may optionally add a lower priority rule to drop any marked packets that failed to get routed by table 42:



          ip rule add priority 110 fwmark 54 table default





          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "2"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f667270%2flinux-bridge-two-nics-and-route-traffic-through-vpn-tunnel-except-specific-dest%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0














            You're right about marking packets using the firewall, but you should not be routing them at that level — use multiple routing tables.



            First, set up your main routing table so that it routes through eth0:



            ip route add default via XXXX dev eth0


            Once the tunnel is up, set up a secondary routing table that routes through tun0:



            ip route add default via YYYY dev tun0 table 42


            Now mark packets destined to tun0:



            iptables -t mange -A PREROUTING ... --set-mark 54


            and set up a routing rule so that marked packets go through table 42:



            ip rule add priority 100 fwmark 54 table 42


            In order to ensure that packets don't go through eth0 when the tunnel is down, you may optionally add a lower priority rule to drop any marked packets that failed to get routed by table 42:



            ip rule add priority 110 fwmark 54 table default





            share|improve this answer



























              0














              You're right about marking packets using the firewall, but you should not be routing them at that level — use multiple routing tables.



              First, set up your main routing table so that it routes through eth0:



              ip route add default via XXXX dev eth0


              Once the tunnel is up, set up a secondary routing table that routes through tun0:



              ip route add default via YYYY dev tun0 table 42


              Now mark packets destined to tun0:



              iptables -t mange -A PREROUTING ... --set-mark 54


              and set up a routing rule so that marked packets go through table 42:



              ip rule add priority 100 fwmark 54 table 42


              In order to ensure that packets don't go through eth0 when the tunnel is down, you may optionally add a lower priority rule to drop any marked packets that failed to get routed by table 42:



              ip rule add priority 110 fwmark 54 table default





              share|improve this answer

























                0












                0








                0







                You're right about marking packets using the firewall, but you should not be routing them at that level — use multiple routing tables.



                First, set up your main routing table so that it routes through eth0:



                ip route add default via XXXX dev eth0


                Once the tunnel is up, set up a secondary routing table that routes through tun0:



                ip route add default via YYYY dev tun0 table 42


                Now mark packets destined to tun0:



                iptables -t mange -A PREROUTING ... --set-mark 54


                and set up a routing rule so that marked packets go through table 42:



                ip rule add priority 100 fwmark 54 table 42


                In order to ensure that packets don't go through eth0 when the tunnel is down, you may optionally add a lower priority rule to drop any marked packets that failed to get routed by table 42:



                ip rule add priority 110 fwmark 54 table default





                share|improve this answer













                You're right about marking packets using the firewall, but you should not be routing them at that level — use multiple routing tables.



                First, set up your main routing table so that it routes through eth0:



                ip route add default via XXXX dev eth0


                Once the tunnel is up, set up a secondary routing table that routes through tun0:



                ip route add default via YYYY dev tun0 table 42


                Now mark packets destined to tun0:



                iptables -t mange -A PREROUTING ... --set-mark 54


                and set up a routing rule so that marked packets go through table 42:



                ip rule add priority 100 fwmark 54 table 42


                In order to ensure that packets don't go through eth0 when the tunnel is down, you may optionally add a lower priority rule to drop any marked packets that failed to get routed by table 42:



                ip rule add priority 110 fwmark 54 table default






                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Feb 15 '15 at 18:18









                jchjch

                42226




                42226



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f667270%2flinux-bridge-two-nics-and-route-traffic-through-vpn-tunnel-except-specific-dest%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Wikipedia:Vital articles Мазмуну Biography - Өмүр баян Philosophy and psychology - Философия жана психология Religion - Дин Social sciences - Коомдук илимдер Language and literature - Тил жана адабият Science - Илим Technology - Технология Arts and recreation - Искусство жана эс алуу History and geography - Тарых жана география Навигация менюсу

                    Bruxelas-Capital Índice Historia | Composición | Situación lingüística | Clima | Cidades irmandadas | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióneO uso das linguas en Bruxelas e a situación do neerlandés"Rexión de Bruxelas Capital"o orixinalSitio da rexiónPáxina de Bruselas no sitio da Oficina de Promoción Turística de Valonia e BruxelasMapa Interactivo da Rexión de Bruxelas-CapitaleeWorldCat332144929079854441105155190212ID28008674080552-90000 0001 0666 3698n94104302ID540940339365017018237

                    What should I write in an apology letter, since I have decided not to join a company after accepting an offer letterShould I keep looking after accepting a job offer?What should I do when I've been verbally told I would get an offer letter, but still haven't gotten one after 4 weeks?Do I accept an offer from a company that I am not likely to join?New job hasn't confirmed starting date and I want to give current employer as much notice as possibleHow should I address my manager in my resignation letter?HR delayed background verification, now jobless as resignedNo email communication after accepting a formal written offer. How should I phrase the call?What should I do if after receiving a verbal offer letter I am informed that my written job offer is put on hold due to some internal issues?Should I inform the current employer that I am about to resign within 1-2 weeks since I have signed the offer letter and waiting for visa?What company will do, if I send their offer letter to another company