What kind of fluid is sand?Liquid sand: is it really a liquid?What can wavy patterned sand tell about the Fluid that formed it?Rotating fluid under gravity, fluid dynamics questionWhat is a fluid flux?Why should fluids be confined for Pascal's Law to be applicableFluid propertiesWhat kind of energy does superfluidity use?Fluid mechanics - rotating Bucket - euler fluid - symmetriesWhat is fluid pressure?What is the LEAST fluid dynamic shape?What really is a fluid?

Are there any German nonsense poems (Jabberwocky)?

Dealing with spaghetti codebase, manager asks for things I can't deliver

Is there a context where the expression `a.b::c` makes sense?

Why did other houses not demand this?

What's difference between "depends on" and "is blocked by" relations between issues in Jira next-gen board?

How to deal with a colleague who is being aggressive?

Why do Russians almost not use verbs of possession akin to "have"?

Why do we need to chain the blocks (creating blockchain) in a permissioned blockchain?

Can my floppy disk still work without a shutter spring?

Function argument returning void or non-void type

USPS Back Room - Trespassing?

Why is unzipped directory exactly 4.0k (much smaller than zipped file)?

What is the use case for non-breathable waterproof pants?

便利な工具 what does な means

Why didn't Thanos use the Time Stone to stop the Avengers' plan?

Gravitational effects of a single human body on the motion of planets

Why haven't we yet tried accelerating a space station with people inside to a near light speed?

Is superuser the same as root?

Is it possible to prohibit all prohibitable schools of magic with a single character?

Grade-school elementary algebra presented in an abstract-algebra style?

Why are Stein manifolds/spaces the analog of affine varieties/schemes in algebraic geometry?

Mercedes C180 (W204) dash symbol

How do I superimpose two math symbols?

Why does the hash of infinity have the digits of π?



What kind of fluid is sand?


Liquid sand: is it really a liquid?What can wavy patterned sand tell about the Fluid that formed it?Rotating fluid under gravity, fluid dynamics questionWhat is a fluid flux?Why should fluids be confined for Pascal's Law to be applicableFluid propertiesWhat kind of energy does superfluidity use?Fluid mechanics - rotating Bucket - euler fluid - symmetriesWhat is fluid pressure?What is the LEAST fluid dynamic shape?What really is a fluid?













11












$begingroup$


Questions:



  1. To what extent is it possible to treat (dry) sand in presence of gravity as a fluid?


  2. How does sand differ from other more standard fluids like liquid substances?


Since the definition of "fluid" is very broad, here I list some less vague points that may help anyone answering:



  • the propagation of waves in sand is different from liquids: if something hits sand I would say that a single wavefront can propagate and it is rapidly damped as it moves away from the impact point. But maybe a strong enough impact can exhibit more ripples?


  • is viscosity present in sand?


  • how does sand behaves at the interfaces with other fluids? Can we define some kind of surface tension when gravity is present?


I would say that having an external gravitational field should be important for sand to manifest these features but I am not completely sure: maybe it is not crucial for the single wavefront after an impact.



Anyway writing this I was not thinking about self gravitation effects and, with exception for the last point, I would assume no interaction with air or other fluids.




Slightly off topic:



It is interesting that we can substitute sand with any ensemble of solid, rigid objects of a fixed size with no interaction except being impenetrable, like sofas. Maybe if said objects can intertwine and bound (like chairs that get stuck together) tha fluid could approximate liquids even more, mimicking covalent or molecular bounds.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    You may be interested in liquid sand
    $endgroup$
    – Cort Ammon
    May 10 at 16:29










  • $begingroup$
    @CortAmmon mind = blown ...
    $endgroup$
    – france95
    May 10 at 17:48















11












$begingroup$


Questions:



  1. To what extent is it possible to treat (dry) sand in presence of gravity as a fluid?


  2. How does sand differ from other more standard fluids like liquid substances?


Since the definition of "fluid" is very broad, here I list some less vague points that may help anyone answering:



  • the propagation of waves in sand is different from liquids: if something hits sand I would say that a single wavefront can propagate and it is rapidly damped as it moves away from the impact point. But maybe a strong enough impact can exhibit more ripples?


  • is viscosity present in sand?


  • how does sand behaves at the interfaces with other fluids? Can we define some kind of surface tension when gravity is present?


I would say that having an external gravitational field should be important for sand to manifest these features but I am not completely sure: maybe it is not crucial for the single wavefront after an impact.



Anyway writing this I was not thinking about self gravitation effects and, with exception for the last point, I would assume no interaction with air or other fluids.




Slightly off topic:



It is interesting that we can substitute sand with any ensemble of solid, rigid objects of a fixed size with no interaction except being impenetrable, like sofas. Maybe if said objects can intertwine and bound (like chairs that get stuck together) tha fluid could approximate liquids even more, mimicking covalent or molecular bounds.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    You may be interested in liquid sand
    $endgroup$
    – Cort Ammon
    May 10 at 16:29










  • $begingroup$
    @CortAmmon mind = blown ...
    $endgroup$
    – france95
    May 10 at 17:48













11












11








11





$begingroup$


Questions:



  1. To what extent is it possible to treat (dry) sand in presence of gravity as a fluid?


  2. How does sand differ from other more standard fluids like liquid substances?


Since the definition of "fluid" is very broad, here I list some less vague points that may help anyone answering:



  • the propagation of waves in sand is different from liquids: if something hits sand I would say that a single wavefront can propagate and it is rapidly damped as it moves away from the impact point. But maybe a strong enough impact can exhibit more ripples?


  • is viscosity present in sand?


  • how does sand behaves at the interfaces with other fluids? Can we define some kind of surface tension when gravity is present?


I would say that having an external gravitational field should be important for sand to manifest these features but I am not completely sure: maybe it is not crucial for the single wavefront after an impact.



Anyway writing this I was not thinking about self gravitation effects and, with exception for the last point, I would assume no interaction with air or other fluids.




Slightly off topic:



It is interesting that we can substitute sand with any ensemble of solid, rigid objects of a fixed size with no interaction except being impenetrable, like sofas. Maybe if said objects can intertwine and bound (like chairs that get stuck together) tha fluid could approximate liquids even more, mimicking covalent or molecular bounds.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Questions:



  1. To what extent is it possible to treat (dry) sand in presence of gravity as a fluid?


  2. How does sand differ from other more standard fluids like liquid substances?


Since the definition of "fluid" is very broad, here I list some less vague points that may help anyone answering:



  • the propagation of waves in sand is different from liquids: if something hits sand I would say that a single wavefront can propagate and it is rapidly damped as it moves away from the impact point. But maybe a strong enough impact can exhibit more ripples?


  • is viscosity present in sand?


  • how does sand behaves at the interfaces with other fluids? Can we define some kind of surface tension when gravity is present?


I would say that having an external gravitational field should be important for sand to manifest these features but I am not completely sure: maybe it is not crucial for the single wavefront after an impact.



Anyway writing this I was not thinking about self gravitation effects and, with exception for the last point, I would assume no interaction with air or other fluids.




Slightly off topic:



It is interesting that we can substitute sand with any ensemble of solid, rigid objects of a fixed size with no interaction except being impenetrable, like sofas. Maybe if said objects can intertwine and bound (like chairs that get stuck together) tha fluid could approximate liquids even more, mimicking covalent or molecular bounds.







fluid-dynamics






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited May 10 at 13:53









Nat

3,77242033




3,77242033










asked May 10 at 13:15









france95france95

1,102321




1,102321







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    You may be interested in liquid sand
    $endgroup$
    – Cort Ammon
    May 10 at 16:29










  • $begingroup$
    @CortAmmon mind = blown ...
    $endgroup$
    – france95
    May 10 at 17:48












  • 4




    $begingroup$
    You may be interested in liquid sand
    $endgroup$
    – Cort Ammon
    May 10 at 16:29










  • $begingroup$
    @CortAmmon mind = blown ...
    $endgroup$
    – france95
    May 10 at 17:48







4




4




$begingroup$
You may be interested in liquid sand
$endgroup$
– Cort Ammon
May 10 at 16:29




$begingroup$
You may be interested in liquid sand
$endgroup$
– Cort Ammon
May 10 at 16:29












$begingroup$
@CortAmmon mind = blown ...
$endgroup$
– france95
May 10 at 17:48




$begingroup$
@CortAmmon mind = blown ...
$endgroup$
– france95
May 10 at 17:48










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

Sand at rest really does not behave like a liquid, it behaves more like a solid. When you hit the surface of a flattened sand pile with a flat large object, there will only be a negligible wave in the grain density within the bulk of the pile. In fact, the dominant wave will be a complicated sound-wave within the grains, passed by interfaces between them, and this will be dissipated very quickly because of the imperfections.



But sand does start to behave a little bit like a very special liquid if it is in a special dynamical and dense enough regime which is called a granular flow (here you are correct that gravity typically helps maintain the higher density). The formal criterion is that it must exhibit a sufficiently large shear rate or gradient of average velocities. An example of this would be the moving parts of a pile of sand when it is being poured from a silo. Then, it is possible to write down an effective set of Navier-Stokes equations for its behavior in terms of densities, pressure, and bulk velocities, which are the same type of equations that govern the dynamics of water.



Beware, however, that even in this mode the behavior of the "sand liquids" is that of a highly Non-Newtonian fluid, putting it on par with the behavior of fluids such as thick slime, resin or ketchup. One particular feature includes the fact that the interaction between the layers of the sand of different velocities will depend in rather non-intuitive ways on the relative velocity of the layers. The dissipation in the grain flow is also very high and without external driving, it will quickly kill any shearing. And once the shearing rate drops below the critical level, the grain flow "freezes out" and suddenly behaves more like a solid again.



Finally, when the sand gets very thin and highly agitated (individual grains receive a lot of random kinetic energy), it may behave as a gas for a short time. The key criterion for this mode is that the grains do not collide too much between themselves and the walls (that dissipates a lot of the kinetic energy). This can be hard to sustain if the grains are heavy and when gravity is present. On the other hand, very light grains can really become a "minor gas-like component" of air for longer amounts of time since the air drag (collisions with air molecules) tends to synchronize the grain velocity with the bulk of the air.



As for your question with the "surface wave" on a pile of sand. This is really quite amusing, because I believe all three modes will typically be present. When you hit the surface of the sand with a small object, the sand will move at that point and create local shearing. Possibly, a part of the sand will eject in the air to be "gas-like" for a moment. However, the shearing in the sand that actually stays in the pile does allow for a fluid-type behaviour for a short moment, creating a wave-like ripple. Nevertheless, the relative velocities get quickly dissipated and the ripple freezes out.



So, ending with a tip for creating sand-liquid waves: try making one in a sand pile that is pressed between two cylinders that rotate at different angular velocities so that the shearing rate in the sand is higher than the critical one. It might then be possible to obtain wave-like phenomena!



(A scientific paper on the topic of granular flows that I found particularly clear is A new constitutive law for dense granular flows by Pierre Jop, Yoël Forterre & Olivier Pouliquen)




EDIT: I just noticed that Cort Ammon posted a link to this Liquid sand youtube video by Mark Robber, where a "fluidized bed" is created by letting air bubble through the sand from below. A fluidized bed is created when the drag of the air from below almost precisely counters the gravitational forces on the individual grains. The point is only indirectly about countering gravity. The main point is about getting the grains out of contact, so that they do not dissipate energy as quickly. As a result, less shearing is needed to sustain a fluid-like behavior, and that is also provided by the uneven air flow. Quite ingenious!






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much for the answer! I was thinking that maybe hitting with enough energy would provoke long lived ripples but probably the roof given by the energy that would melt the sand is still a very short time interval. About granular flow, Navier Stokes means that it could exhibit turbolence and vorticity, or is there some reason to exclude those phenomena?
    $endgroup$
    – france95
    May 10 at 17:46






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @france95 Maybe in principle. But the problem is that since the viscosity is very high, it would be quite difficult to reach sufficient Reynolds numbers in the flow. (Intuitively, the "sand fluid" smoothes out most of the seeds of turbulence by dissipation.) It might be that by the time you are reaching the right Reynolds number, the heating of the sand is so large you are melting it as well :)
    $endgroup$
    – Void
    May 10 at 17:54






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think maybe the Casson or Bignham models might fit the behaviour, but you would have to make an experiment to make determine if that is true (I was thinking maybe a pipe filled with sand up to half, then a thin stripe of black sand as a marker and finally fill the rest with regular sand. Use a compressor on one end and the sand could flow in something similar to Poiseuille flow but since the stress is small in the middle, that part would flow like a solid block, and at the edges with higher shear rate you'd be able to fit for the right model).
    $endgroup$
    – S V
    May 10 at 18:42












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f479163%2fwhat-kind-of-fluid-is-sand%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









5












$begingroup$

Sand at rest really does not behave like a liquid, it behaves more like a solid. When you hit the surface of a flattened sand pile with a flat large object, there will only be a negligible wave in the grain density within the bulk of the pile. In fact, the dominant wave will be a complicated sound-wave within the grains, passed by interfaces between them, and this will be dissipated very quickly because of the imperfections.



But sand does start to behave a little bit like a very special liquid if it is in a special dynamical and dense enough regime which is called a granular flow (here you are correct that gravity typically helps maintain the higher density). The formal criterion is that it must exhibit a sufficiently large shear rate or gradient of average velocities. An example of this would be the moving parts of a pile of sand when it is being poured from a silo. Then, it is possible to write down an effective set of Navier-Stokes equations for its behavior in terms of densities, pressure, and bulk velocities, which are the same type of equations that govern the dynamics of water.



Beware, however, that even in this mode the behavior of the "sand liquids" is that of a highly Non-Newtonian fluid, putting it on par with the behavior of fluids such as thick slime, resin or ketchup. One particular feature includes the fact that the interaction between the layers of the sand of different velocities will depend in rather non-intuitive ways on the relative velocity of the layers. The dissipation in the grain flow is also very high and without external driving, it will quickly kill any shearing. And once the shearing rate drops below the critical level, the grain flow "freezes out" and suddenly behaves more like a solid again.



Finally, when the sand gets very thin and highly agitated (individual grains receive a lot of random kinetic energy), it may behave as a gas for a short time. The key criterion for this mode is that the grains do not collide too much between themselves and the walls (that dissipates a lot of the kinetic energy). This can be hard to sustain if the grains are heavy and when gravity is present. On the other hand, very light grains can really become a "minor gas-like component" of air for longer amounts of time since the air drag (collisions with air molecules) tends to synchronize the grain velocity with the bulk of the air.



As for your question with the "surface wave" on a pile of sand. This is really quite amusing, because I believe all three modes will typically be present. When you hit the surface of the sand with a small object, the sand will move at that point and create local shearing. Possibly, a part of the sand will eject in the air to be "gas-like" for a moment. However, the shearing in the sand that actually stays in the pile does allow for a fluid-type behaviour for a short moment, creating a wave-like ripple. Nevertheless, the relative velocities get quickly dissipated and the ripple freezes out.



So, ending with a tip for creating sand-liquid waves: try making one in a sand pile that is pressed between two cylinders that rotate at different angular velocities so that the shearing rate in the sand is higher than the critical one. It might then be possible to obtain wave-like phenomena!



(A scientific paper on the topic of granular flows that I found particularly clear is A new constitutive law for dense granular flows by Pierre Jop, Yoël Forterre & Olivier Pouliquen)




EDIT: I just noticed that Cort Ammon posted a link to this Liquid sand youtube video by Mark Robber, where a "fluidized bed" is created by letting air bubble through the sand from below. A fluidized bed is created when the drag of the air from below almost precisely counters the gravitational forces on the individual grains. The point is only indirectly about countering gravity. The main point is about getting the grains out of contact, so that they do not dissipate energy as quickly. As a result, less shearing is needed to sustain a fluid-like behavior, and that is also provided by the uneven air flow. Quite ingenious!






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much for the answer! I was thinking that maybe hitting with enough energy would provoke long lived ripples but probably the roof given by the energy that would melt the sand is still a very short time interval. About granular flow, Navier Stokes means that it could exhibit turbolence and vorticity, or is there some reason to exclude those phenomena?
    $endgroup$
    – france95
    May 10 at 17:46






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @france95 Maybe in principle. But the problem is that since the viscosity is very high, it would be quite difficult to reach sufficient Reynolds numbers in the flow. (Intuitively, the "sand fluid" smoothes out most of the seeds of turbulence by dissipation.) It might be that by the time you are reaching the right Reynolds number, the heating of the sand is so large you are melting it as well :)
    $endgroup$
    – Void
    May 10 at 17:54






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think maybe the Casson or Bignham models might fit the behaviour, but you would have to make an experiment to make determine if that is true (I was thinking maybe a pipe filled with sand up to half, then a thin stripe of black sand as a marker and finally fill the rest with regular sand. Use a compressor on one end and the sand could flow in something similar to Poiseuille flow but since the stress is small in the middle, that part would flow like a solid block, and at the edges with higher shear rate you'd be able to fit for the right model).
    $endgroup$
    – S V
    May 10 at 18:42
















5












$begingroup$

Sand at rest really does not behave like a liquid, it behaves more like a solid. When you hit the surface of a flattened sand pile with a flat large object, there will only be a negligible wave in the grain density within the bulk of the pile. In fact, the dominant wave will be a complicated sound-wave within the grains, passed by interfaces between them, and this will be dissipated very quickly because of the imperfections.



But sand does start to behave a little bit like a very special liquid if it is in a special dynamical and dense enough regime which is called a granular flow (here you are correct that gravity typically helps maintain the higher density). The formal criterion is that it must exhibit a sufficiently large shear rate or gradient of average velocities. An example of this would be the moving parts of a pile of sand when it is being poured from a silo. Then, it is possible to write down an effective set of Navier-Stokes equations for its behavior in terms of densities, pressure, and bulk velocities, which are the same type of equations that govern the dynamics of water.



Beware, however, that even in this mode the behavior of the "sand liquids" is that of a highly Non-Newtonian fluid, putting it on par with the behavior of fluids such as thick slime, resin or ketchup. One particular feature includes the fact that the interaction between the layers of the sand of different velocities will depend in rather non-intuitive ways on the relative velocity of the layers. The dissipation in the grain flow is also very high and without external driving, it will quickly kill any shearing. And once the shearing rate drops below the critical level, the grain flow "freezes out" and suddenly behaves more like a solid again.



Finally, when the sand gets very thin and highly agitated (individual grains receive a lot of random kinetic energy), it may behave as a gas for a short time. The key criterion for this mode is that the grains do not collide too much between themselves and the walls (that dissipates a lot of the kinetic energy). This can be hard to sustain if the grains are heavy and when gravity is present. On the other hand, very light grains can really become a "minor gas-like component" of air for longer amounts of time since the air drag (collisions with air molecules) tends to synchronize the grain velocity with the bulk of the air.



As for your question with the "surface wave" on a pile of sand. This is really quite amusing, because I believe all three modes will typically be present. When you hit the surface of the sand with a small object, the sand will move at that point and create local shearing. Possibly, a part of the sand will eject in the air to be "gas-like" for a moment. However, the shearing in the sand that actually stays in the pile does allow for a fluid-type behaviour for a short moment, creating a wave-like ripple. Nevertheless, the relative velocities get quickly dissipated and the ripple freezes out.



So, ending with a tip for creating sand-liquid waves: try making one in a sand pile that is pressed between two cylinders that rotate at different angular velocities so that the shearing rate in the sand is higher than the critical one. It might then be possible to obtain wave-like phenomena!



(A scientific paper on the topic of granular flows that I found particularly clear is A new constitutive law for dense granular flows by Pierre Jop, Yoël Forterre & Olivier Pouliquen)




EDIT: I just noticed that Cort Ammon posted a link to this Liquid sand youtube video by Mark Robber, where a "fluidized bed" is created by letting air bubble through the sand from below. A fluidized bed is created when the drag of the air from below almost precisely counters the gravitational forces on the individual grains. The point is only indirectly about countering gravity. The main point is about getting the grains out of contact, so that they do not dissipate energy as quickly. As a result, less shearing is needed to sustain a fluid-like behavior, and that is also provided by the uneven air flow. Quite ingenious!






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much for the answer! I was thinking that maybe hitting with enough energy would provoke long lived ripples but probably the roof given by the energy that would melt the sand is still a very short time interval. About granular flow, Navier Stokes means that it could exhibit turbolence and vorticity, or is there some reason to exclude those phenomena?
    $endgroup$
    – france95
    May 10 at 17:46






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @france95 Maybe in principle. But the problem is that since the viscosity is very high, it would be quite difficult to reach sufficient Reynolds numbers in the flow. (Intuitively, the "sand fluid" smoothes out most of the seeds of turbulence by dissipation.) It might be that by the time you are reaching the right Reynolds number, the heating of the sand is so large you are melting it as well :)
    $endgroup$
    – Void
    May 10 at 17:54






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think maybe the Casson or Bignham models might fit the behaviour, but you would have to make an experiment to make determine if that is true (I was thinking maybe a pipe filled with sand up to half, then a thin stripe of black sand as a marker and finally fill the rest with regular sand. Use a compressor on one end and the sand could flow in something similar to Poiseuille flow but since the stress is small in the middle, that part would flow like a solid block, and at the edges with higher shear rate you'd be able to fit for the right model).
    $endgroup$
    – S V
    May 10 at 18:42














5












5








5





$begingroup$

Sand at rest really does not behave like a liquid, it behaves more like a solid. When you hit the surface of a flattened sand pile with a flat large object, there will only be a negligible wave in the grain density within the bulk of the pile. In fact, the dominant wave will be a complicated sound-wave within the grains, passed by interfaces between them, and this will be dissipated very quickly because of the imperfections.



But sand does start to behave a little bit like a very special liquid if it is in a special dynamical and dense enough regime which is called a granular flow (here you are correct that gravity typically helps maintain the higher density). The formal criterion is that it must exhibit a sufficiently large shear rate or gradient of average velocities. An example of this would be the moving parts of a pile of sand when it is being poured from a silo. Then, it is possible to write down an effective set of Navier-Stokes equations for its behavior in terms of densities, pressure, and bulk velocities, which are the same type of equations that govern the dynamics of water.



Beware, however, that even in this mode the behavior of the "sand liquids" is that of a highly Non-Newtonian fluid, putting it on par with the behavior of fluids such as thick slime, resin or ketchup. One particular feature includes the fact that the interaction between the layers of the sand of different velocities will depend in rather non-intuitive ways on the relative velocity of the layers. The dissipation in the grain flow is also very high and without external driving, it will quickly kill any shearing. And once the shearing rate drops below the critical level, the grain flow "freezes out" and suddenly behaves more like a solid again.



Finally, when the sand gets very thin and highly agitated (individual grains receive a lot of random kinetic energy), it may behave as a gas for a short time. The key criterion for this mode is that the grains do not collide too much between themselves and the walls (that dissipates a lot of the kinetic energy). This can be hard to sustain if the grains are heavy and when gravity is present. On the other hand, very light grains can really become a "minor gas-like component" of air for longer amounts of time since the air drag (collisions with air molecules) tends to synchronize the grain velocity with the bulk of the air.



As for your question with the "surface wave" on a pile of sand. This is really quite amusing, because I believe all three modes will typically be present. When you hit the surface of the sand with a small object, the sand will move at that point and create local shearing. Possibly, a part of the sand will eject in the air to be "gas-like" for a moment. However, the shearing in the sand that actually stays in the pile does allow for a fluid-type behaviour for a short moment, creating a wave-like ripple. Nevertheless, the relative velocities get quickly dissipated and the ripple freezes out.



So, ending with a tip for creating sand-liquid waves: try making one in a sand pile that is pressed between two cylinders that rotate at different angular velocities so that the shearing rate in the sand is higher than the critical one. It might then be possible to obtain wave-like phenomena!



(A scientific paper on the topic of granular flows that I found particularly clear is A new constitutive law for dense granular flows by Pierre Jop, Yoël Forterre & Olivier Pouliquen)




EDIT: I just noticed that Cort Ammon posted a link to this Liquid sand youtube video by Mark Robber, where a "fluidized bed" is created by letting air bubble through the sand from below. A fluidized bed is created when the drag of the air from below almost precisely counters the gravitational forces on the individual grains. The point is only indirectly about countering gravity. The main point is about getting the grains out of contact, so that they do not dissipate energy as quickly. As a result, less shearing is needed to sustain a fluid-like behavior, and that is also provided by the uneven air flow. Quite ingenious!






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Sand at rest really does not behave like a liquid, it behaves more like a solid. When you hit the surface of a flattened sand pile with a flat large object, there will only be a negligible wave in the grain density within the bulk of the pile. In fact, the dominant wave will be a complicated sound-wave within the grains, passed by interfaces between them, and this will be dissipated very quickly because of the imperfections.



But sand does start to behave a little bit like a very special liquid if it is in a special dynamical and dense enough regime which is called a granular flow (here you are correct that gravity typically helps maintain the higher density). The formal criterion is that it must exhibit a sufficiently large shear rate or gradient of average velocities. An example of this would be the moving parts of a pile of sand when it is being poured from a silo. Then, it is possible to write down an effective set of Navier-Stokes equations for its behavior in terms of densities, pressure, and bulk velocities, which are the same type of equations that govern the dynamics of water.



Beware, however, that even in this mode the behavior of the "sand liquids" is that of a highly Non-Newtonian fluid, putting it on par with the behavior of fluids such as thick slime, resin or ketchup. One particular feature includes the fact that the interaction between the layers of the sand of different velocities will depend in rather non-intuitive ways on the relative velocity of the layers. The dissipation in the grain flow is also very high and without external driving, it will quickly kill any shearing. And once the shearing rate drops below the critical level, the grain flow "freezes out" and suddenly behaves more like a solid again.



Finally, when the sand gets very thin and highly agitated (individual grains receive a lot of random kinetic energy), it may behave as a gas for a short time. The key criterion for this mode is that the grains do not collide too much between themselves and the walls (that dissipates a lot of the kinetic energy). This can be hard to sustain if the grains are heavy and when gravity is present. On the other hand, very light grains can really become a "minor gas-like component" of air for longer amounts of time since the air drag (collisions with air molecules) tends to synchronize the grain velocity with the bulk of the air.



As for your question with the "surface wave" on a pile of sand. This is really quite amusing, because I believe all three modes will typically be present. When you hit the surface of the sand with a small object, the sand will move at that point and create local shearing. Possibly, a part of the sand will eject in the air to be "gas-like" for a moment. However, the shearing in the sand that actually stays in the pile does allow for a fluid-type behaviour for a short moment, creating a wave-like ripple. Nevertheless, the relative velocities get quickly dissipated and the ripple freezes out.



So, ending with a tip for creating sand-liquid waves: try making one in a sand pile that is pressed between two cylinders that rotate at different angular velocities so that the shearing rate in the sand is higher than the critical one. It might then be possible to obtain wave-like phenomena!



(A scientific paper on the topic of granular flows that I found particularly clear is A new constitutive law for dense granular flows by Pierre Jop, Yoël Forterre & Olivier Pouliquen)




EDIT: I just noticed that Cort Ammon posted a link to this Liquid sand youtube video by Mark Robber, where a "fluidized bed" is created by letting air bubble through the sand from below. A fluidized bed is created when the drag of the air from below almost precisely counters the gravitational forces on the individual grains. The point is only indirectly about countering gravity. The main point is about getting the grains out of contact, so that they do not dissipate energy as quickly. As a result, less shearing is needed to sustain a fluid-like behavior, and that is also provided by the uneven air flow. Quite ingenious!







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited May 10 at 17:49

























answered May 10 at 16:04









VoidVoid

11.4k12060




11.4k12060











  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much for the answer! I was thinking that maybe hitting with enough energy would provoke long lived ripples but probably the roof given by the energy that would melt the sand is still a very short time interval. About granular flow, Navier Stokes means that it could exhibit turbolence and vorticity, or is there some reason to exclude those phenomena?
    $endgroup$
    – france95
    May 10 at 17:46






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @france95 Maybe in principle. But the problem is that since the viscosity is very high, it would be quite difficult to reach sufficient Reynolds numbers in the flow. (Intuitively, the "sand fluid" smoothes out most of the seeds of turbulence by dissipation.) It might be that by the time you are reaching the right Reynolds number, the heating of the sand is so large you are melting it as well :)
    $endgroup$
    – Void
    May 10 at 17:54






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think maybe the Casson or Bignham models might fit the behaviour, but you would have to make an experiment to make determine if that is true (I was thinking maybe a pipe filled with sand up to half, then a thin stripe of black sand as a marker and finally fill the rest with regular sand. Use a compressor on one end and the sand could flow in something similar to Poiseuille flow but since the stress is small in the middle, that part would flow like a solid block, and at the edges with higher shear rate you'd be able to fit for the right model).
    $endgroup$
    – S V
    May 10 at 18:42

















  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much for the answer! I was thinking that maybe hitting with enough energy would provoke long lived ripples but probably the roof given by the energy that would melt the sand is still a very short time interval. About granular flow, Navier Stokes means that it could exhibit turbolence and vorticity, or is there some reason to exclude those phenomena?
    $endgroup$
    – france95
    May 10 at 17:46






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @france95 Maybe in principle. But the problem is that since the viscosity is very high, it would be quite difficult to reach sufficient Reynolds numbers in the flow. (Intuitively, the "sand fluid" smoothes out most of the seeds of turbulence by dissipation.) It might be that by the time you are reaching the right Reynolds number, the heating of the sand is so large you are melting it as well :)
    $endgroup$
    – Void
    May 10 at 17:54






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I think maybe the Casson or Bignham models might fit the behaviour, but you would have to make an experiment to make determine if that is true (I was thinking maybe a pipe filled with sand up to half, then a thin stripe of black sand as a marker and finally fill the rest with regular sand. Use a compressor on one end and the sand could flow in something similar to Poiseuille flow but since the stress is small in the middle, that part would flow like a solid block, and at the edges with higher shear rate you'd be able to fit for the right model).
    $endgroup$
    – S V
    May 10 at 18:42
















$begingroup$
Thank you very much for the answer! I was thinking that maybe hitting with enough energy would provoke long lived ripples but probably the roof given by the energy that would melt the sand is still a very short time interval. About granular flow, Navier Stokes means that it could exhibit turbolence and vorticity, or is there some reason to exclude those phenomena?
$endgroup$
– france95
May 10 at 17:46




$begingroup$
Thank you very much for the answer! I was thinking that maybe hitting with enough energy would provoke long lived ripples but probably the roof given by the energy that would melt the sand is still a very short time interval. About granular flow, Navier Stokes means that it could exhibit turbolence and vorticity, or is there some reason to exclude those phenomena?
$endgroup$
– france95
May 10 at 17:46




1




1




$begingroup$
@france95 Maybe in principle. But the problem is that since the viscosity is very high, it would be quite difficult to reach sufficient Reynolds numbers in the flow. (Intuitively, the "sand fluid" smoothes out most of the seeds of turbulence by dissipation.) It might be that by the time you are reaching the right Reynolds number, the heating of the sand is so large you are melting it as well :)
$endgroup$
– Void
May 10 at 17:54




$begingroup$
@france95 Maybe in principle. But the problem is that since the viscosity is very high, it would be quite difficult to reach sufficient Reynolds numbers in the flow. (Intuitively, the "sand fluid" smoothes out most of the seeds of turbulence by dissipation.) It might be that by the time you are reaching the right Reynolds number, the heating of the sand is so large you are melting it as well :)
$endgroup$
– Void
May 10 at 17:54




1




1




$begingroup$
I think maybe the Casson or Bignham models might fit the behaviour, but you would have to make an experiment to make determine if that is true (I was thinking maybe a pipe filled with sand up to half, then a thin stripe of black sand as a marker and finally fill the rest with regular sand. Use a compressor on one end and the sand could flow in something similar to Poiseuille flow but since the stress is small in the middle, that part would flow like a solid block, and at the edges with higher shear rate you'd be able to fit for the right model).
$endgroup$
– S V
May 10 at 18:42





$begingroup$
I think maybe the Casson or Bignham models might fit the behaviour, but you would have to make an experiment to make determine if that is true (I was thinking maybe a pipe filled with sand up to half, then a thin stripe of black sand as a marker and finally fill the rest with regular sand. Use a compressor on one end and the sand could flow in something similar to Poiseuille flow but since the stress is small in the middle, that part would flow like a solid block, and at the edges with higher shear rate you'd be able to fit for the right model).
$endgroup$
– S V
May 10 at 18:42


















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f479163%2fwhat-kind-of-fluid-is-sand%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Wikipedia:Vital articles Мазмуну Biography - Өмүр баян Philosophy and psychology - Философия жана психология Religion - Дин Social sciences - Коомдук илимдер Language and literature - Тил жана адабият Science - Илим Technology - Технология Arts and recreation - Искусство жана эс алуу History and geography - Тарых жана география Навигация менюсу

Bruxelas-Capital Índice Historia | Composición | Situación lingüística | Clima | Cidades irmandadas | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióneO uso das linguas en Bruxelas e a situación do neerlandés"Rexión de Bruxelas Capital"o orixinalSitio da rexiónPáxina de Bruselas no sitio da Oficina de Promoción Turística de Valonia e BruxelasMapa Interactivo da Rexión de Bruxelas-CapitaleeWorldCat332144929079854441105155190212ID28008674080552-90000 0001 0666 3698n94104302ID540940339365017018237

What should I write in an apology letter, since I have decided not to join a company after accepting an offer letterShould I keep looking after accepting a job offer?What should I do when I've been verbally told I would get an offer letter, but still haven't gotten one after 4 weeks?Do I accept an offer from a company that I am not likely to join?New job hasn't confirmed starting date and I want to give current employer as much notice as possibleHow should I address my manager in my resignation letter?HR delayed background verification, now jobless as resignedNo email communication after accepting a formal written offer. How should I phrase the call?What should I do if after receiving a verbal offer letter I am informed that my written job offer is put on hold due to some internal issues?Should I inform the current employer that I am about to resign within 1-2 weeks since I have signed the offer letter and waiting for visa?What company will do, if I send their offer letter to another company