Is std::next for vector O(n) or O(1)? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) The Ask Question Wizard is Live! Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experienceConcatenating two std::vectorsstd::wstring VS std::stringHow to find out if an item is present in a std::vector?Why is “using namespace std” considered bad practice?How do I use arrays in C++?Image Processing: Algorithm Improvement for 'Coca-Cola Can' RecognitionReplacing a 32-bit loop counter with 64-bit introduces crazy performance deviationsHow does std::list.size() have constant complexity?Why does std::vector reserve not “double” its capacity, while resize does?How std::advance iterator type is deduced?

Multi tool use
Multi tool use

Can the DM override racial traits?

The variadic template constructor of my class cannot modify my class members, why is that so?

Why can't devices on different VLANs, but on the same subnet, communicate?

Simulating Exploding Dice

Can a novice safely splice in wire to lengthen 5V charging cable?

Do working physicists consider Newtonian mechanics to be "falsified"?

Is there a writing software that you can sort scenes like slides in PowerPoint?

What is special about square numbers here?

How are presidential pardons supposed to be used?

In horse breeding, what is the female equivalent of putting a horse out "to stud"?

How many people can fit inside Mordenkainen's Magnificent Mansion?

Am I ethically obligated to go into work on an off day if the reason is sudden?

What was the last x86 CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in?

How can I define good in a religion that claims no moral authority?

Can a 1st-level character have an ability score above 18?

How to pronounce 1ターン?

Make it rain characters

Keeping a retro style to sci-fi spaceships?

How to politely respond to generic emails requesting a PhD/job in my lab? Without wasting too much time

Relations between two reciprocal partial derivatives?

Is every episode of "Where are my Pants?" identical?

Do warforged have souls?

Why does this iterative way of solving of equation work?

How did passengers keep warm on sail ships?



Is std::next for vector O(n) or O(1)?



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
The Ask Question Wizard is Live!
Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experienceConcatenating two std::vectorsstd::wstring VS std::stringHow to find out if an item is present in a std::vector?Why is “using namespace std” considered bad practice?How do I use arrays in C++?Image Processing: Algorithm Improvement for 'Coca-Cola Can' RecognitionReplacing a 32-bit loop counter with 64-bit introduces crazy performance deviationsHow does std::list.size() have constant complexity?Why does std::vector reserve not “double” its capacity, while resize does?How std::advance iterator type is deduced?



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








12















In C++11 I use std::next because If I want to change vector to list, I dont have to change the rest of code.



For list, std::next is O(n), because I need to iterate all elements. But how is it for a vector? I have found this note on cppreference:




However, if InputIt or ForwardIt additionally meets the requirements of LegacyRandomAccessIterator, complexity is constant.




Does vector meet these requirements? And why "Legacy"?










share|improve this question



















  • 13





    "Constant" means O(1).

    – Some programmer dude
    Apr 9 at 7:03






  • 1





    I know that, but I dont know If it aplies to vector, since I dont understand LegacyRandomAccessIterator. Why Legacy?

    – Martin Perry
    Apr 9 at 7:04







  • 4





    @MartinPerry Follow the link? In the page you pull the quote from, the word "LegacyRandomAccessIterator" is a link to an explanation about it. And for vectors, iterators are (legacy) random-access iterators (as you should be able to find out in the std::vector reference).

    – Some programmer dude
    Apr 9 at 7:06


















12















In C++11 I use std::next because If I want to change vector to list, I dont have to change the rest of code.



For list, std::next is O(n), because I need to iterate all elements. But how is it for a vector? I have found this note on cppreference:




However, if InputIt or ForwardIt additionally meets the requirements of LegacyRandomAccessIterator, complexity is constant.




Does vector meet these requirements? And why "Legacy"?










share|improve this question



















  • 13





    "Constant" means O(1).

    – Some programmer dude
    Apr 9 at 7:03






  • 1





    I know that, but I dont know If it aplies to vector, since I dont understand LegacyRandomAccessIterator. Why Legacy?

    – Martin Perry
    Apr 9 at 7:04







  • 4





    @MartinPerry Follow the link? In the page you pull the quote from, the word "LegacyRandomAccessIterator" is a link to an explanation about it. And for vectors, iterators are (legacy) random-access iterators (as you should be able to find out in the std::vector reference).

    – Some programmer dude
    Apr 9 at 7:06














12












12








12


2






In C++11 I use std::next because If I want to change vector to list, I dont have to change the rest of code.



For list, std::next is O(n), because I need to iterate all elements. But how is it for a vector? I have found this note on cppreference:




However, if InputIt or ForwardIt additionally meets the requirements of LegacyRandomAccessIterator, complexity is constant.




Does vector meet these requirements? And why "Legacy"?










share|improve this question
















In C++11 I use std::next because If I want to change vector to list, I dont have to change the rest of code.



For list, std::next is O(n), because I need to iterate all elements. But how is it for a vector? I have found this note on cppreference:




However, if InputIt or ForwardIt additionally meets the requirements of LegacyRandomAccessIterator, complexity is constant.




Does vector meet these requirements? And why "Legacy"?







c++






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









El Profesor

11k32341




11k32341










asked Apr 9 at 7:01









Martin PerryMartin Perry

5,22333267




5,22333267







  • 13





    "Constant" means O(1).

    – Some programmer dude
    Apr 9 at 7:03






  • 1





    I know that, but I dont know If it aplies to vector, since I dont understand LegacyRandomAccessIterator. Why Legacy?

    – Martin Perry
    Apr 9 at 7:04







  • 4





    @MartinPerry Follow the link? In the page you pull the quote from, the word "LegacyRandomAccessIterator" is a link to an explanation about it. And for vectors, iterators are (legacy) random-access iterators (as you should be able to find out in the std::vector reference).

    – Some programmer dude
    Apr 9 at 7:06













  • 13





    "Constant" means O(1).

    – Some programmer dude
    Apr 9 at 7:03






  • 1





    I know that, but I dont know If it aplies to vector, since I dont understand LegacyRandomAccessIterator. Why Legacy?

    – Martin Perry
    Apr 9 at 7:04







  • 4





    @MartinPerry Follow the link? In the page you pull the quote from, the word "LegacyRandomAccessIterator" is a link to an explanation about it. And for vectors, iterators are (legacy) random-access iterators (as you should be able to find out in the std::vector reference).

    – Some programmer dude
    Apr 9 at 7:06








13




13





"Constant" means O(1).

– Some programmer dude
Apr 9 at 7:03





"Constant" means O(1).

– Some programmer dude
Apr 9 at 7:03




1




1





I know that, but I dont know If it aplies to vector, since I dont understand LegacyRandomAccessIterator. Why Legacy?

– Martin Perry
Apr 9 at 7:04






I know that, but I dont know If it aplies to vector, since I dont understand LegacyRandomAccessIterator. Why Legacy?

– Martin Perry
Apr 9 at 7:04





4




4





@MartinPerry Follow the link? In the page you pull the quote from, the word "LegacyRandomAccessIterator" is a link to an explanation about it. And for vectors, iterators are (legacy) random-access iterators (as you should be able to find out in the std::vector reference).

– Some programmer dude
Apr 9 at 7:06






@MartinPerry Follow the link? In the page you pull the quote from, the word "LegacyRandomAccessIterator" is a link to an explanation about it. And for vectors, iterators are (legacy) random-access iterators (as you should be able to find out in the std::vector reference).

– Some programmer dude
Apr 9 at 7:06













2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















15














There is a plan of adding concepts (compile time type constraints) in C++20. The new standard is supposed to contain concepts like InputIterator or RandomAccessIterator. To distinguish between the concepts and the old trait-like requirements cppreference uses LegacyRandomAccessIterator and so on for pre-concept requirements and RandomAccessIterator and so for concept requirements.



And so yes, std::vector::iterator meets requirements of LegacyRandomAccessIterator and actually will be fulfilling RandomAccessIterator concept as well. This leads straight to conclusion that std::next called on vector::iterator has complexity O(1).






share|improve this answer
































    8















    Does vector meet these requirements?




    Yes, it does:



    https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/container/vector



    Quote: "iterator LegacyRandomAccessIterator"




    And why "Legacy"?




    The existing iterators have been renamed "legacy" because of the upcoming C++ library feature called ranges, which is a replacement for the current approach. Ranges will have new iterators. The existing ones will still be there, thus they're called "legacy."






    share|improve this answer























      Your Answer






      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
      StackExchange.snippets.init();
      );
      );
      , "code-snippets");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "1"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55586847%2fis-stdnext-for-vector-on-or-o1%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      15














      There is a plan of adding concepts (compile time type constraints) in C++20. The new standard is supposed to contain concepts like InputIterator or RandomAccessIterator. To distinguish between the concepts and the old trait-like requirements cppreference uses LegacyRandomAccessIterator and so on for pre-concept requirements and RandomAccessIterator and so for concept requirements.



      And so yes, std::vector::iterator meets requirements of LegacyRandomAccessIterator and actually will be fulfilling RandomAccessIterator concept as well. This leads straight to conclusion that std::next called on vector::iterator has complexity O(1).






      share|improve this answer





























        15














        There is a plan of adding concepts (compile time type constraints) in C++20. The new standard is supposed to contain concepts like InputIterator or RandomAccessIterator. To distinguish between the concepts and the old trait-like requirements cppreference uses LegacyRandomAccessIterator and so on for pre-concept requirements and RandomAccessIterator and so for concept requirements.



        And so yes, std::vector::iterator meets requirements of LegacyRandomAccessIterator and actually will be fulfilling RandomAccessIterator concept as well. This leads straight to conclusion that std::next called on vector::iterator has complexity O(1).






        share|improve this answer



























          15












          15








          15







          There is a plan of adding concepts (compile time type constraints) in C++20. The new standard is supposed to contain concepts like InputIterator or RandomAccessIterator. To distinguish between the concepts and the old trait-like requirements cppreference uses LegacyRandomAccessIterator and so on for pre-concept requirements and RandomAccessIterator and so for concept requirements.



          And so yes, std::vector::iterator meets requirements of LegacyRandomAccessIterator and actually will be fulfilling RandomAccessIterator concept as well. This leads straight to conclusion that std::next called on vector::iterator has complexity O(1).






          share|improve this answer















          There is a plan of adding concepts (compile time type constraints) in C++20. The new standard is supposed to contain concepts like InputIterator or RandomAccessIterator. To distinguish between the concepts and the old trait-like requirements cppreference uses LegacyRandomAccessIterator and so on for pre-concept requirements and RandomAccessIterator and so for concept requirements.



          And so yes, std::vector::iterator meets requirements of LegacyRandomAccessIterator and actually will be fulfilling RandomAccessIterator concept as well. This leads straight to conclusion that std::next called on vector::iterator has complexity O(1).







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Apr 9 at 7:17

























          answered Apr 9 at 7:11









          bartopbartop

          3,4931132




          3,4931132























              8















              Does vector meet these requirements?




              Yes, it does:



              https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/container/vector



              Quote: "iterator LegacyRandomAccessIterator"




              And why "Legacy"?




              The existing iterators have been renamed "legacy" because of the upcoming C++ library feature called ranges, which is a replacement for the current approach. Ranges will have new iterators. The existing ones will still be there, thus they're called "legacy."






              share|improve this answer



























                8















                Does vector meet these requirements?




                Yes, it does:



                https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/container/vector



                Quote: "iterator LegacyRandomAccessIterator"




                And why "Legacy"?




                The existing iterators have been renamed "legacy" because of the upcoming C++ library feature called ranges, which is a replacement for the current approach. Ranges will have new iterators. The existing ones will still be there, thus they're called "legacy."






                share|improve this answer

























                  8












                  8








                  8








                  Does vector meet these requirements?




                  Yes, it does:



                  https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/container/vector



                  Quote: "iterator LegacyRandomAccessIterator"




                  And why "Legacy"?




                  The existing iterators have been renamed "legacy" because of the upcoming C++ library feature called ranges, which is a replacement for the current approach. Ranges will have new iterators. The existing ones will still be there, thus they're called "legacy."






                  share|improve this answer














                  Does vector meet these requirements?




                  Yes, it does:



                  https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/container/vector



                  Quote: "iterator LegacyRandomAccessIterator"




                  And why "Legacy"?




                  The existing iterators have been renamed "legacy" because of the upcoming C++ library feature called ranges, which is a replacement for the current approach. Ranges will have new iterators. The existing ones will still be there, thus they're called "legacy."







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Apr 9 at 7:11









                  Nikos C.Nikos C.

                  34.5k53967




                  34.5k53967



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55586847%2fis-stdnext-for-vector-on-or-o1%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      mVIT9,naRx
                      RWJx80IqJZ,Rp mLSU,THJo

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      RemoteApp sporadic failureWindows 2008 RemoteAPP client disconnects within a matter of minutesWhat is the minimum version of RDP supported by Server 2012 RDS?How to configure a Remoteapp server to increase stabilityMicrosoft RemoteApp Active SessionRDWeb TS connection broken for some users post RemoteApp certificate changeRemote Desktop Licensing, RemoteAPPRDS 2012 R2 some users are not able to logon after changed date and time on Connection BrokersWhat happens during Remote Desktop logon, and is there any logging?After installing RDS on WinServer 2016 I still can only connect with two users?RD Connection via RDGW to Session host is not connecting

                      Vilaño, A Laracha Índice Patrimonio | Lugares e parroquias | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación43°14′52″N 8°36′03″O / 43.24775, -8.60070

                      Cegueira Índice Epidemioloxía | Deficiencia visual | Tipos de cegueira | Principais causas de cegueira | Tratamento | Técnicas de adaptación e axudas | Vida dos cegos | Primeiros auxilios | Crenzas respecto das persoas cegas | Crenzas das persoas cegas | O neno deficiente visual | Aspectos psicolóxicos da cegueira | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación54.054.154.436928256blindnessDicionario da Real Academia GalegaPortal das Palabras"International Standards: Visual Standards — Aspects and Ranges of Vision Loss with Emphasis on Population Surveys.""Visual impairment and blindness""Presentan un plan para previr a cegueira"o orixinalACCDV Associació Catalana de Cecs i Disminuïts Visuals - PMFTrachoma"Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis"1844137110.1056/NEJMoa0802268Cans guía - os mellores amigos dos cegosArquivadoEscola de cans guía para cegos en Mortágua, PortugalArquivado"Tecnología para ciegos y deficientes visuales. Recopilación de recursos gratuitos en la Red""Colorino""‘COL.diesis’, escuchar los sonidos del color""COL.diesis: Transforming Colour into Melody and Implementing the Result in a Colour Sensor Device"o orixinal"Sistema de desarrollo de sinestesia color-sonido para invidentes utilizando un protocolo de audio""Enseñanza táctil - geometría y color. Juegos didácticos para niños ciegos y videntes""Sistema Constanz"L'ocupació laboral dels cecs a l'Estat espanyol està pràcticament equiparada a la de les persones amb visió, entrevista amb Pedro ZuritaONCE (Organización Nacional de Cegos de España)Prevención da cegueiraDescrición de deficiencias visuais (Disc@pnet)Braillín, un boneco atractivo para calquera neno, con ou sen discapacidade, que permite familiarizarse co sistema de escritura e lectura brailleAxudas Técnicas36838ID00897494007150-90057129528256DOID:1432HP:0000618D001766C10.597.751.941.162C97109C0155020