SChannel errors after enabling SSL on a Windows Server 2012 R2 The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Come Celebrate our 10 Year Anniversary!Why does Window's SSL Cipher-Suite get restricted under certain SSL certificates?What is the minimum version of RDP supported by Server 2012 RDS?SChannel SSL 3.0 error - OWA - Windows Server 2008 R2TLS 1.0 handshake fails in Windows Server 2012 R2Schannel Error - RandomWindows server 2012 IIS 8 php data post upload failure to mysqlIIS 8.5 server not accepting a TLS 1.0 connection from Windows Server 2003Use of SSL in ADFSWhat are the security risks of selecting “allow local activation security check exemptions”?Schannel 36874 errors on Windows Server 2016

How to copy the contents of all files with a certain name into a new file?

Finding the path in a graph from A to B then back to A with a minimum of shared edges

Can a 1st-level character have an ability score above 18?

Working through the single responsibility principle (SRP) in Python when calls are expensive

Arduino Pro Micro - switch off LEDs

ELI5: Why do they say that Israel would have been the fourth country to land a spacecraft on the Moon and why do they call it low cost?

Why does the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) not include telescopes from Africa, Asia or Australia?

How should I replace vector<uint8_t>::const_iterator in an API?

How to split my screen on my Macbook Air?

How is simplicity better than precision and clarity in prose?

High Q peak in frequency response means what in time domain?

What is this lever in Argentinian toilets?

Why can't devices on different VLANs, but on the same subnet, communicate?

Is above average number of years spent on PhD considered a red flag in future academia or industry positions?

Can the DM override racial traits?

Make it rain characters

How are presidential pardons supposed to be used?

Would an alien lifeform be able to achieve space travel if lacking in vision?

Python - Fishing Simulator

How did passengers keep warm on sail ships?

Did the UK government pay "millions and millions of dollars" to try to snag Julian Assange?

The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG 1397BC53640DB551

Take groceries in checked luggage

How to pronounce 1ターン?



SChannel errors after enabling SSL on a Windows Server 2012 R2



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
Come Celebrate our 10 Year Anniversary!Why does Window's SSL Cipher-Suite get restricted under certain SSL certificates?What is the minimum version of RDP supported by Server 2012 RDS?SChannel SSL 3.0 error - OWA - Windows Server 2008 R2TLS 1.0 handshake fails in Windows Server 2012 R2Schannel Error - RandomWindows server 2012 IIS 8 php data post upload failure to mysqlIIS 8.5 server not accepting a TLS 1.0 connection from Windows Server 2003Use of SSL in ADFSWhat are the security risks of selecting “allow local activation security check exemptions”?Schannel 36874 errors on Windows Server 2016



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








1















I have a Windows Server 2012 R2 instance on Azure. For a new website I have ordered a certificate by GlobalSign. After getting the certificates from them I have completed the certificate request in IIS and installed the root certifcate.



I moved the website to a new instance, so I have exported the certificate with its private key and imported it on the new instance.



That was my installation and it seemed to work pretty well.



Now I am getting a lot SChannel errors. They are:



A fatal alert was generated and sent to the remote endpoint. This may result in termination of the connection. The TLS protocol defined fatal error code is 40. The Windows SChannel error state is 1205.



A fatal alert was generated and sent to the remote endpoint. This may result in termination of the connection. The TLS protocol defined fatal error code is 20. The Windows SChannel error state is 960.



An SSL 3.0 connection request was received from a remote client application, but none of the cipher suites supported by the client application are supported by the server. The SSL connection request has failed.



It's the first time that I use SSL and to be honest, I have no idea what I am doing. For me it looks fine when I request the website (http://laola.biz).



I have already used the SSL Check by GlobalSign which gives me Grade C. https://sslcheck.globalsign.com/en_US/sslcheck?host=laola.biz#191.233.85.240-cert-ssl



Here a list of the certificates from mmc (my website is laola.biz):



Intermediate
enter image description here



Root
enter image description here



Personal
enter image description here



Any ideas what I could have done wrong here?










share|improve this question

















  • 1





    I found the solution to my problem. I'm not sure if it may be related to yours. My IIS was using the certificate, so the initial GET request to the server worked fine. After, when I wanted to do a POST and the application had to sign something with the certificate, it was failing to get the certificate due to the application not having permissions to the certificate in the OS store. Hope this helps.

    – Origin
    May 29 '15 at 15:57











  • For the error: "Error Event ID 36888: "The following fatal alert was generated: 20. The internal error state is 960" You can check the resolution in the link below: blogs.technet.microsoft.com/keithab/2016/11/11/… and/or port135.com/2018/11/20/windows-schannel-error-state-is-960

    – user513485
    Mar 8 at 12:43

















1















I have a Windows Server 2012 R2 instance on Azure. For a new website I have ordered a certificate by GlobalSign. After getting the certificates from them I have completed the certificate request in IIS and installed the root certifcate.



I moved the website to a new instance, so I have exported the certificate with its private key and imported it on the new instance.



That was my installation and it seemed to work pretty well.



Now I am getting a lot SChannel errors. They are:



A fatal alert was generated and sent to the remote endpoint. This may result in termination of the connection. The TLS protocol defined fatal error code is 40. The Windows SChannel error state is 1205.



A fatal alert was generated and sent to the remote endpoint. This may result in termination of the connection. The TLS protocol defined fatal error code is 20. The Windows SChannel error state is 960.



An SSL 3.0 connection request was received from a remote client application, but none of the cipher suites supported by the client application are supported by the server. The SSL connection request has failed.



It's the first time that I use SSL and to be honest, I have no idea what I am doing. For me it looks fine when I request the website (http://laola.biz).



I have already used the SSL Check by GlobalSign which gives me Grade C. https://sslcheck.globalsign.com/en_US/sslcheck?host=laola.biz#191.233.85.240-cert-ssl



Here a list of the certificates from mmc (my website is laola.biz):



Intermediate
enter image description here



Root
enter image description here



Personal
enter image description here



Any ideas what I could have done wrong here?










share|improve this question

















  • 1





    I found the solution to my problem. I'm not sure if it may be related to yours. My IIS was using the certificate, so the initial GET request to the server worked fine. After, when I wanted to do a POST and the application had to sign something with the certificate, it was failing to get the certificate due to the application not having permissions to the certificate in the OS store. Hope this helps.

    – Origin
    May 29 '15 at 15:57











  • For the error: "Error Event ID 36888: "The following fatal alert was generated: 20. The internal error state is 960" You can check the resolution in the link below: blogs.technet.microsoft.com/keithab/2016/11/11/… and/or port135.com/2018/11/20/windows-schannel-error-state-is-960

    – user513485
    Mar 8 at 12:43













1












1








1


1






I have a Windows Server 2012 R2 instance on Azure. For a new website I have ordered a certificate by GlobalSign. After getting the certificates from them I have completed the certificate request in IIS and installed the root certifcate.



I moved the website to a new instance, so I have exported the certificate with its private key and imported it on the new instance.



That was my installation and it seemed to work pretty well.



Now I am getting a lot SChannel errors. They are:



A fatal alert was generated and sent to the remote endpoint. This may result in termination of the connection. The TLS protocol defined fatal error code is 40. The Windows SChannel error state is 1205.



A fatal alert was generated and sent to the remote endpoint. This may result in termination of the connection. The TLS protocol defined fatal error code is 20. The Windows SChannel error state is 960.



An SSL 3.0 connection request was received from a remote client application, but none of the cipher suites supported by the client application are supported by the server. The SSL connection request has failed.



It's the first time that I use SSL and to be honest, I have no idea what I am doing. For me it looks fine when I request the website (http://laola.biz).



I have already used the SSL Check by GlobalSign which gives me Grade C. https://sslcheck.globalsign.com/en_US/sslcheck?host=laola.biz#191.233.85.240-cert-ssl



Here a list of the certificates from mmc (my website is laola.biz):



Intermediate
enter image description here



Root
enter image description here



Personal
enter image description here



Any ideas what I could have done wrong here?










share|improve this question














I have a Windows Server 2012 R2 instance on Azure. For a new website I have ordered a certificate by GlobalSign. After getting the certificates from them I have completed the certificate request in IIS and installed the root certifcate.



I moved the website to a new instance, so I have exported the certificate with its private key and imported it on the new instance.



That was my installation and it seemed to work pretty well.



Now I am getting a lot SChannel errors. They are:



A fatal alert was generated and sent to the remote endpoint. This may result in termination of the connection. The TLS protocol defined fatal error code is 40. The Windows SChannel error state is 1205.



A fatal alert was generated and sent to the remote endpoint. This may result in termination of the connection. The TLS protocol defined fatal error code is 20. The Windows SChannel error state is 960.



An SSL 3.0 connection request was received from a remote client application, but none of the cipher suites supported by the client application are supported by the server. The SSL connection request has failed.



It's the first time that I use SSL and to be honest, I have no idea what I am doing. For me it looks fine when I request the website (http://laola.biz).



I have already used the SSL Check by GlobalSign which gives me Grade C. https://sslcheck.globalsign.com/en_US/sslcheck?host=laola.biz#191.233.85.240-cert-ssl



Here a list of the certificates from mmc (my website is laola.biz):



Intermediate
enter image description here



Root
enter image description here



Personal
enter image description here



Any ideas what I could have done wrong here?







ssl windows-server-2012 schannel






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Apr 24 '15 at 8:14









tobi.attobi.at

108115




108115







  • 1





    I found the solution to my problem. I'm not sure if it may be related to yours. My IIS was using the certificate, so the initial GET request to the server worked fine. After, when I wanted to do a POST and the application had to sign something with the certificate, it was failing to get the certificate due to the application not having permissions to the certificate in the OS store. Hope this helps.

    – Origin
    May 29 '15 at 15:57











  • For the error: "Error Event ID 36888: "The following fatal alert was generated: 20. The internal error state is 960" You can check the resolution in the link below: blogs.technet.microsoft.com/keithab/2016/11/11/… and/or port135.com/2018/11/20/windows-schannel-error-state-is-960

    – user513485
    Mar 8 at 12:43












  • 1





    I found the solution to my problem. I'm not sure if it may be related to yours. My IIS was using the certificate, so the initial GET request to the server worked fine. After, when I wanted to do a POST and the application had to sign something with the certificate, it was failing to get the certificate due to the application not having permissions to the certificate in the OS store. Hope this helps.

    – Origin
    May 29 '15 at 15:57











  • For the error: "Error Event ID 36888: "The following fatal alert was generated: 20. The internal error state is 960" You can check the resolution in the link below: blogs.technet.microsoft.com/keithab/2016/11/11/… and/or port135.com/2018/11/20/windows-schannel-error-state-is-960

    – user513485
    Mar 8 at 12:43







1




1





I found the solution to my problem. I'm not sure if it may be related to yours. My IIS was using the certificate, so the initial GET request to the server worked fine. After, when I wanted to do a POST and the application had to sign something with the certificate, it was failing to get the certificate due to the application not having permissions to the certificate in the OS store. Hope this helps.

– Origin
May 29 '15 at 15:57





I found the solution to my problem. I'm not sure if it may be related to yours. My IIS was using the certificate, so the initial GET request to the server worked fine. After, when I wanted to do a POST and the application had to sign something with the certificate, it was failing to get the certificate due to the application not having permissions to the certificate in the OS store. Hope this helps.

– Origin
May 29 '15 at 15:57













For the error: "Error Event ID 36888: "The following fatal alert was generated: 20. The internal error state is 960" You can check the resolution in the link below: blogs.technet.microsoft.com/keithab/2016/11/11/… and/or port135.com/2018/11/20/windows-schannel-error-state-is-960

– user513485
Mar 8 at 12:43





For the error: "Error Event ID 36888: "The following fatal alert was generated: 20. The internal error state is 960" You can check the resolution in the link below: blogs.technet.microsoft.com/keithab/2016/11/11/… and/or port135.com/2018/11/20/windows-schannel-error-state-is-960

– user513485
Mar 8 at 12:43










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














As different people (well meaning and otherwise) attempt to access your site from various devices running various browsers on various operating systems, depending on the protocol they choose to secure that communication, you will end up seen messages by the schannel source.



The following blog should help you understand some of the messages you see in your logs. http://blogs.msdn.com/b/kaushal/archive/2012/10/06/ssl-tls-alert-protocol-amp-the-alert-codes.aspx



The grade you got there is a little concerning. You wouldn't have SSL3 enabled if you published the site to Azure Websites directly.



You can disable SSL3 using guidance here
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/kaushal/archive/2014/10/22/poodle-vulnerability-padding-oracle-on-downgraded-legacy-encryption.aspx



If you can move the site from a VM to an Azure Website itself that would be better. It will save you having to patch and secure the VM(s) used to host the web site. You instead rely on Azure PaaS to provide the platform to host the website. You take care of the web site code while Azure secures and maintains the IIS/platform.



The upcoming changes to the platform from TLS perspective are reflected in https://testsslclient.trafficmanager.net/. You can test this to see the grading your website can get if you were to migrate the site to an Azure website directly.






share|improve this answer























  • adding a link to a video which shows end to end azure web sites creation with source control and continuous deployment. channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Azure-Friday/…

    – maweeras
    Jun 7 '15 at 10:00











  • Hi. Thanks for the links. Although the move to Azure Websites is not a solution. You just can't say I should move to a different server/architecture, because I've got a problem with the other one. I do have my reasons to use a VM.

    – tobi.at
    Jun 14 '15 at 9:11











  • That's why I said "if you can...". I didn't say solve it by moving to Azure web sites. In this case you need to investigate each schannel error and see if its a cause for concern. If you don't know enough about TLS/SSL errors, then you may consider opening a case with Microsoft.

    – maweeras
    Jun 15 '15 at 8:12











  • The URL for testsslclient.trafficmanager.net no longer works

    – JoshBerke
    Jul 28 '16 at 14:35











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "2"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f685245%2fschannel-errors-after-enabling-ssl-on-a-windows-server-2012-r2%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0














As different people (well meaning and otherwise) attempt to access your site from various devices running various browsers on various operating systems, depending on the protocol they choose to secure that communication, you will end up seen messages by the schannel source.



The following blog should help you understand some of the messages you see in your logs. http://blogs.msdn.com/b/kaushal/archive/2012/10/06/ssl-tls-alert-protocol-amp-the-alert-codes.aspx



The grade you got there is a little concerning. You wouldn't have SSL3 enabled if you published the site to Azure Websites directly.



You can disable SSL3 using guidance here
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/kaushal/archive/2014/10/22/poodle-vulnerability-padding-oracle-on-downgraded-legacy-encryption.aspx



If you can move the site from a VM to an Azure Website itself that would be better. It will save you having to patch and secure the VM(s) used to host the web site. You instead rely on Azure PaaS to provide the platform to host the website. You take care of the web site code while Azure secures and maintains the IIS/platform.



The upcoming changes to the platform from TLS perspective are reflected in https://testsslclient.trafficmanager.net/. You can test this to see the grading your website can get if you were to migrate the site to an Azure website directly.






share|improve this answer























  • adding a link to a video which shows end to end azure web sites creation with source control and continuous deployment. channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Azure-Friday/…

    – maweeras
    Jun 7 '15 at 10:00











  • Hi. Thanks for the links. Although the move to Azure Websites is not a solution. You just can't say I should move to a different server/architecture, because I've got a problem with the other one. I do have my reasons to use a VM.

    – tobi.at
    Jun 14 '15 at 9:11











  • That's why I said "if you can...". I didn't say solve it by moving to Azure web sites. In this case you need to investigate each schannel error and see if its a cause for concern. If you don't know enough about TLS/SSL errors, then you may consider opening a case with Microsoft.

    – maweeras
    Jun 15 '15 at 8:12











  • The URL for testsslclient.trafficmanager.net no longer works

    – JoshBerke
    Jul 28 '16 at 14:35















0














As different people (well meaning and otherwise) attempt to access your site from various devices running various browsers on various operating systems, depending on the protocol they choose to secure that communication, you will end up seen messages by the schannel source.



The following blog should help you understand some of the messages you see in your logs. http://blogs.msdn.com/b/kaushal/archive/2012/10/06/ssl-tls-alert-protocol-amp-the-alert-codes.aspx



The grade you got there is a little concerning. You wouldn't have SSL3 enabled if you published the site to Azure Websites directly.



You can disable SSL3 using guidance here
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/kaushal/archive/2014/10/22/poodle-vulnerability-padding-oracle-on-downgraded-legacy-encryption.aspx



If you can move the site from a VM to an Azure Website itself that would be better. It will save you having to patch and secure the VM(s) used to host the web site. You instead rely on Azure PaaS to provide the platform to host the website. You take care of the web site code while Azure secures and maintains the IIS/platform.



The upcoming changes to the platform from TLS perspective are reflected in https://testsslclient.trafficmanager.net/. You can test this to see the grading your website can get if you were to migrate the site to an Azure website directly.






share|improve this answer























  • adding a link to a video which shows end to end azure web sites creation with source control and continuous deployment. channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Azure-Friday/…

    – maweeras
    Jun 7 '15 at 10:00











  • Hi. Thanks for the links. Although the move to Azure Websites is not a solution. You just can't say I should move to a different server/architecture, because I've got a problem with the other one. I do have my reasons to use a VM.

    – tobi.at
    Jun 14 '15 at 9:11











  • That's why I said "if you can...". I didn't say solve it by moving to Azure web sites. In this case you need to investigate each schannel error and see if its a cause for concern. If you don't know enough about TLS/SSL errors, then you may consider opening a case with Microsoft.

    – maweeras
    Jun 15 '15 at 8:12











  • The URL for testsslclient.trafficmanager.net no longer works

    – JoshBerke
    Jul 28 '16 at 14:35













0












0








0







As different people (well meaning and otherwise) attempt to access your site from various devices running various browsers on various operating systems, depending on the protocol they choose to secure that communication, you will end up seen messages by the schannel source.



The following blog should help you understand some of the messages you see in your logs. http://blogs.msdn.com/b/kaushal/archive/2012/10/06/ssl-tls-alert-protocol-amp-the-alert-codes.aspx



The grade you got there is a little concerning. You wouldn't have SSL3 enabled if you published the site to Azure Websites directly.



You can disable SSL3 using guidance here
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/kaushal/archive/2014/10/22/poodle-vulnerability-padding-oracle-on-downgraded-legacy-encryption.aspx



If you can move the site from a VM to an Azure Website itself that would be better. It will save you having to patch and secure the VM(s) used to host the web site. You instead rely on Azure PaaS to provide the platform to host the website. You take care of the web site code while Azure secures and maintains the IIS/platform.



The upcoming changes to the platform from TLS perspective are reflected in https://testsslclient.trafficmanager.net/. You can test this to see the grading your website can get if you were to migrate the site to an Azure website directly.






share|improve this answer













As different people (well meaning and otherwise) attempt to access your site from various devices running various browsers on various operating systems, depending on the protocol they choose to secure that communication, you will end up seen messages by the schannel source.



The following blog should help you understand some of the messages you see in your logs. http://blogs.msdn.com/b/kaushal/archive/2012/10/06/ssl-tls-alert-protocol-amp-the-alert-codes.aspx



The grade you got there is a little concerning. You wouldn't have SSL3 enabled if you published the site to Azure Websites directly.



You can disable SSL3 using guidance here
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/kaushal/archive/2014/10/22/poodle-vulnerability-padding-oracle-on-downgraded-legacy-encryption.aspx



If you can move the site from a VM to an Azure Website itself that would be better. It will save you having to patch and secure the VM(s) used to host the web site. You instead rely on Azure PaaS to provide the platform to host the website. You take care of the web site code while Azure secures and maintains the IIS/platform.



The upcoming changes to the platform from TLS perspective are reflected in https://testsslclient.trafficmanager.net/. You can test this to see the grading your website can get if you were to migrate the site to an Azure website directly.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Jun 6 '15 at 21:04









maweerasmaweeras

2,62621323




2,62621323












  • adding a link to a video which shows end to end azure web sites creation with source control and continuous deployment. channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Azure-Friday/…

    – maweeras
    Jun 7 '15 at 10:00











  • Hi. Thanks for the links. Although the move to Azure Websites is not a solution. You just can't say I should move to a different server/architecture, because I've got a problem with the other one. I do have my reasons to use a VM.

    – tobi.at
    Jun 14 '15 at 9:11











  • That's why I said "if you can...". I didn't say solve it by moving to Azure web sites. In this case you need to investigate each schannel error and see if its a cause for concern. If you don't know enough about TLS/SSL errors, then you may consider opening a case with Microsoft.

    – maweeras
    Jun 15 '15 at 8:12











  • The URL for testsslclient.trafficmanager.net no longer works

    – JoshBerke
    Jul 28 '16 at 14:35

















  • adding a link to a video which shows end to end azure web sites creation with source control and continuous deployment. channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Azure-Friday/…

    – maweeras
    Jun 7 '15 at 10:00











  • Hi. Thanks for the links. Although the move to Azure Websites is not a solution. You just can't say I should move to a different server/architecture, because I've got a problem with the other one. I do have my reasons to use a VM.

    – tobi.at
    Jun 14 '15 at 9:11











  • That's why I said "if you can...". I didn't say solve it by moving to Azure web sites. In this case you need to investigate each schannel error and see if its a cause for concern. If you don't know enough about TLS/SSL errors, then you may consider opening a case with Microsoft.

    – maweeras
    Jun 15 '15 at 8:12











  • The URL for testsslclient.trafficmanager.net no longer works

    – JoshBerke
    Jul 28 '16 at 14:35
















adding a link to a video which shows end to end azure web sites creation with source control and continuous deployment. channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Azure-Friday/…

– maweeras
Jun 7 '15 at 10:00





adding a link to a video which shows end to end azure web sites creation with source control and continuous deployment. channel9.msdn.com/Shows/Azure-Friday/…

– maweeras
Jun 7 '15 at 10:00













Hi. Thanks for the links. Although the move to Azure Websites is not a solution. You just can't say I should move to a different server/architecture, because I've got a problem with the other one. I do have my reasons to use a VM.

– tobi.at
Jun 14 '15 at 9:11





Hi. Thanks for the links. Although the move to Azure Websites is not a solution. You just can't say I should move to a different server/architecture, because I've got a problem with the other one. I do have my reasons to use a VM.

– tobi.at
Jun 14 '15 at 9:11













That's why I said "if you can...". I didn't say solve it by moving to Azure web sites. In this case you need to investigate each schannel error and see if its a cause for concern. If you don't know enough about TLS/SSL errors, then you may consider opening a case with Microsoft.

– maweeras
Jun 15 '15 at 8:12





That's why I said "if you can...". I didn't say solve it by moving to Azure web sites. In this case you need to investigate each schannel error and see if its a cause for concern. If you don't know enough about TLS/SSL errors, then you may consider opening a case with Microsoft.

– maweeras
Jun 15 '15 at 8:12













The URL for testsslclient.trafficmanager.net no longer works

– JoshBerke
Jul 28 '16 at 14:35





The URL for testsslclient.trafficmanager.net no longer works

– JoshBerke
Jul 28 '16 at 14:35

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f685245%2fschannel-errors-after-enabling-ssl-on-a-windows-server-2012-r2%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Wikipedia:Vital articles Мазмуну Biography - Өмүр баян Philosophy and psychology - Философия жана психология Religion - Дин Social sciences - Коомдук илимдер Language and literature - Тил жана адабият Science - Илим Technology - Технология Arts and recreation - Искусство жана эс алуу History and geography - Тарых жана география Навигация менюсу

Bruxelas-Capital Índice Historia | Composición | Situación lingüística | Clima | Cidades irmandadas | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióneO uso das linguas en Bruxelas e a situación do neerlandés"Rexión de Bruxelas Capital"o orixinalSitio da rexiónPáxina de Bruselas no sitio da Oficina de Promoción Turística de Valonia e BruxelasMapa Interactivo da Rexión de Bruxelas-CapitaleeWorldCat332144929079854441105155190212ID28008674080552-90000 0001 0666 3698n94104302ID540940339365017018237

What should I write in an apology letter, since I have decided not to join a company after accepting an offer letterShould I keep looking after accepting a job offer?What should I do when I've been verbally told I would get an offer letter, but still haven't gotten one after 4 weeks?Do I accept an offer from a company that I am not likely to join?New job hasn't confirmed starting date and I want to give current employer as much notice as possibleHow should I address my manager in my resignation letter?HR delayed background verification, now jobless as resignedNo email communication after accepting a formal written offer. How should I phrase the call?What should I do if after receiving a verbal offer letter I am informed that my written job offer is put on hold due to some internal issues?Should I inform the current employer that I am about to resign within 1-2 weeks since I have signed the offer letter and waiting for visa?What company will do, if I send their offer letter to another company