Should the British be getting ready for a no-deal Brexit? [on hold] The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Is there a good estimate of how British citizens (not non-British citizens) voted in the Brexit referendum?Will the British Parliament prevent “Brexit”?What happens if Parliament rejects the Brexit deal?What constitutes a bad deal for Brexit?Could (in theory) the British government or some other British entity “neuter” the British MEPs before Brexit (Spring 2019)?What are the main reasons for why negotiating a proper Brexit deal has been so hard?Pensions of British EU Civil Service in Theresa May's brexit dealHow will brexit affect the British export and import?Brexit - No Deal RejectionEU directives during the transition period in May's Brexit deal

Segmentation fault output is suppressed when piping stdin into a function. Why?

Working through the single responsibility principle (SRP) in Python when calls are expensive

Finding the path in a graph from A to B then back to A with a minimum of shared edges

Simulation of a banking system with an Account class in C++

I could not break this equation. Please help me

How did the audience guess the pentatonic scale in Bobby McFerrin's presentation?

What information about me do stores get via my credit card?

Is it ethical to upload a automatically generated paper to a non peer-reviewed site as part of a larger research?

Can the DM override racial traits?

"... to apply for a visa" or "... and applied for a visa"?

The variadic template constructor of my class cannot modify my class members, why is that so?

Typeface like Times New Roman but with "tied" percent sign

Is there a writing software that you can sort scenes like slides in PowerPoint?

How to copy the contents of all files with a certain name into a new file?

High Q peak in frequency response means what in time domain?

Relations between two reciprocal partial derivatives?

How many people can fit inside Mordenkainen's Magnificent Mansion?

What is this lever in Argentinian toilets?

system() function string length limit

Can a 1st-level character have an ability score above 18?

First use of “packing” as in carrying a gun

Wolves and sheep

Cooking pasta in a water boiler

In horse breeding, what is the female equivalent of putting a horse out "to stud"?



Should the British be getting ready for a no-deal Brexit? [on hold]



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Is there a good estimate of how British citizens (not non-British citizens) voted in the Brexit referendum?Will the British Parliament prevent “Brexit”?What happens if Parliament rejects the Brexit deal?What constitutes a bad deal for Brexit?Could (in theory) the British government or some other British entity “neuter” the British MEPs before Brexit (Spring 2019)?What are the main reasons for why negotiating a proper Brexit deal has been so hard?Pensions of British EU Civil Service in Theresa May's brexit dealHow will brexit affect the British export and import?Brexit - No Deal RejectionEU directives during the transition period in May's Brexit deal










6















As an American, I have been watching the Brexit proceedings with some confusion. To all appearances, British politicians do not want to compromise, and the European leaders do not want to compromise. This suggests that a no-deal Brexit will occur on the 12th of April (Friday). Given the dire warnings about the dangers of a no-deal Brexit, I would have expected people to be taking precautions, such as stockpiling food or medicine. Why is that not happening? Are the deleterious effects of a no-deal Brexit longer term rather than shorter term? Or is everyone assuming that some kind of deal will be struck at the last minute?










share|improve this question















put on hold as primarily opinion-based by LangLangC, CoedRhyfelwr, SJuan76, Frank from Frankfurt, Federico Apr 9 at 10:20


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • 5





    My impression has been that no-deal Brexit will have effects more like the 2008 USA recession than the USA Great Depression. It certainly won't be as bad as, for example, Venezuela's collapse.

    – Kevin
    Apr 8 at 22:40






  • 1





    FWIW May is cognizant that the UK's union might be at stake in the event of a no deal Brexit. IMHO the only sensible scenario where no deal might occur at this point is by accident. It would be after the EU rejects an extension for some reason or another (it could very well be this one, but I'd gather May will get a long extension) and, with a gun to their faces, the MPs fail to subsequently accept a variation of May's deal and then fail to repeal article 50.

    – Denis de Bernardy
    Apr 9 at 7:10







  • 1





    Tactically, yes. The UK "should" have been actively preparing for no-deal more than 2 years ago. With adequate preparation, the government could therefore show the EU that they were ready and had nothing to fear - and therefore would have had a much stronger negotiating position. History will surely make case studies of the blunders of negotiation which have occurred over the past 2 years.

    – Chris Melville
    Apr 9 at 8:32






  • 1





    @ChrisMelville of course, that would have forced a lot of the business no deal planning to occur earlier. Since in many cases this is "close UK arm of the business" that would have made it clear much earlier that the game was up.

    – pjc50
    Apr 9 at 8:52






  • 1





    No politician is allowed to say that the real negotiations will start the day after a theoretical "no deal" has happened. But that's the political reality of the situation.

    – alephzero
    Apr 9 at 9:14















6















As an American, I have been watching the Brexit proceedings with some confusion. To all appearances, British politicians do not want to compromise, and the European leaders do not want to compromise. This suggests that a no-deal Brexit will occur on the 12th of April (Friday). Given the dire warnings about the dangers of a no-deal Brexit, I would have expected people to be taking precautions, such as stockpiling food or medicine. Why is that not happening? Are the deleterious effects of a no-deal Brexit longer term rather than shorter term? Or is everyone assuming that some kind of deal will be struck at the last minute?










share|improve this question















put on hold as primarily opinion-based by LangLangC, CoedRhyfelwr, SJuan76, Frank from Frankfurt, Federico Apr 9 at 10:20


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • 5





    My impression has been that no-deal Brexit will have effects more like the 2008 USA recession than the USA Great Depression. It certainly won't be as bad as, for example, Venezuela's collapse.

    – Kevin
    Apr 8 at 22:40






  • 1





    FWIW May is cognizant that the UK's union might be at stake in the event of a no deal Brexit. IMHO the only sensible scenario where no deal might occur at this point is by accident. It would be after the EU rejects an extension for some reason or another (it could very well be this one, but I'd gather May will get a long extension) and, with a gun to their faces, the MPs fail to subsequently accept a variation of May's deal and then fail to repeal article 50.

    – Denis de Bernardy
    Apr 9 at 7:10







  • 1





    Tactically, yes. The UK "should" have been actively preparing for no-deal more than 2 years ago. With adequate preparation, the government could therefore show the EU that they were ready and had nothing to fear - and therefore would have had a much stronger negotiating position. History will surely make case studies of the blunders of negotiation which have occurred over the past 2 years.

    – Chris Melville
    Apr 9 at 8:32






  • 1





    @ChrisMelville of course, that would have forced a lot of the business no deal planning to occur earlier. Since in many cases this is "close UK arm of the business" that would have made it clear much earlier that the game was up.

    – pjc50
    Apr 9 at 8:52






  • 1





    No politician is allowed to say that the real negotiations will start the day after a theoretical "no deal" has happened. But that's the political reality of the situation.

    – alephzero
    Apr 9 at 9:14













6












6








6








As an American, I have been watching the Brexit proceedings with some confusion. To all appearances, British politicians do not want to compromise, and the European leaders do not want to compromise. This suggests that a no-deal Brexit will occur on the 12th of April (Friday). Given the dire warnings about the dangers of a no-deal Brexit, I would have expected people to be taking precautions, such as stockpiling food or medicine. Why is that not happening? Are the deleterious effects of a no-deal Brexit longer term rather than shorter term? Or is everyone assuming that some kind of deal will be struck at the last minute?










share|improve this question
















As an American, I have been watching the Brexit proceedings with some confusion. To all appearances, British politicians do not want to compromise, and the European leaders do not want to compromise. This suggests that a no-deal Brexit will occur on the 12th of April (Friday). Given the dire warnings about the dangers of a no-deal Brexit, I would have expected people to be taking precautions, such as stockpiling food or medicine. Why is that not happening? Are the deleterious effects of a no-deal Brexit longer term rather than shorter term? Or is everyone assuming that some kind of deal will be struck at the last minute?







united-kingdom brexit






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 9 at 8:30









JJJ

6,57022457




6,57022457










asked Apr 8 at 22:22









adam.bakeradam.baker

22418




22418




put on hold as primarily opinion-based by LangLangC, CoedRhyfelwr, SJuan76, Frank from Frankfurt, Federico Apr 9 at 10:20


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









put on hold as primarily opinion-based by LangLangC, CoedRhyfelwr, SJuan76, Frank from Frankfurt, Federico Apr 9 at 10:20


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









  • 5





    My impression has been that no-deal Brexit will have effects more like the 2008 USA recession than the USA Great Depression. It certainly won't be as bad as, for example, Venezuela's collapse.

    – Kevin
    Apr 8 at 22:40






  • 1





    FWIW May is cognizant that the UK's union might be at stake in the event of a no deal Brexit. IMHO the only sensible scenario where no deal might occur at this point is by accident. It would be after the EU rejects an extension for some reason or another (it could very well be this one, but I'd gather May will get a long extension) and, with a gun to their faces, the MPs fail to subsequently accept a variation of May's deal and then fail to repeal article 50.

    – Denis de Bernardy
    Apr 9 at 7:10







  • 1





    Tactically, yes. The UK "should" have been actively preparing for no-deal more than 2 years ago. With adequate preparation, the government could therefore show the EU that they were ready and had nothing to fear - and therefore would have had a much stronger negotiating position. History will surely make case studies of the blunders of negotiation which have occurred over the past 2 years.

    – Chris Melville
    Apr 9 at 8:32






  • 1





    @ChrisMelville of course, that would have forced a lot of the business no deal planning to occur earlier. Since in many cases this is "close UK arm of the business" that would have made it clear much earlier that the game was up.

    – pjc50
    Apr 9 at 8:52






  • 1





    No politician is allowed to say that the real negotiations will start the day after a theoretical "no deal" has happened. But that's the political reality of the situation.

    – alephzero
    Apr 9 at 9:14












  • 5





    My impression has been that no-deal Brexit will have effects more like the 2008 USA recession than the USA Great Depression. It certainly won't be as bad as, for example, Venezuela's collapse.

    – Kevin
    Apr 8 at 22:40






  • 1





    FWIW May is cognizant that the UK's union might be at stake in the event of a no deal Brexit. IMHO the only sensible scenario where no deal might occur at this point is by accident. It would be after the EU rejects an extension for some reason or another (it could very well be this one, but I'd gather May will get a long extension) and, with a gun to their faces, the MPs fail to subsequently accept a variation of May's deal and then fail to repeal article 50.

    – Denis de Bernardy
    Apr 9 at 7:10







  • 1





    Tactically, yes. The UK "should" have been actively preparing for no-deal more than 2 years ago. With adequate preparation, the government could therefore show the EU that they were ready and had nothing to fear - and therefore would have had a much stronger negotiating position. History will surely make case studies of the blunders of negotiation which have occurred over the past 2 years.

    – Chris Melville
    Apr 9 at 8:32






  • 1





    @ChrisMelville of course, that would have forced a lot of the business no deal planning to occur earlier. Since in many cases this is "close UK arm of the business" that would have made it clear much earlier that the game was up.

    – pjc50
    Apr 9 at 8:52






  • 1





    No politician is allowed to say that the real negotiations will start the day after a theoretical "no deal" has happened. But that's the political reality of the situation.

    – alephzero
    Apr 9 at 9:14







5




5





My impression has been that no-deal Brexit will have effects more like the 2008 USA recession than the USA Great Depression. It certainly won't be as bad as, for example, Venezuela's collapse.

– Kevin
Apr 8 at 22:40





My impression has been that no-deal Brexit will have effects more like the 2008 USA recession than the USA Great Depression. It certainly won't be as bad as, for example, Venezuela's collapse.

– Kevin
Apr 8 at 22:40




1




1





FWIW May is cognizant that the UK's union might be at stake in the event of a no deal Brexit. IMHO the only sensible scenario where no deal might occur at this point is by accident. It would be after the EU rejects an extension for some reason or another (it could very well be this one, but I'd gather May will get a long extension) and, with a gun to their faces, the MPs fail to subsequently accept a variation of May's deal and then fail to repeal article 50.

– Denis de Bernardy
Apr 9 at 7:10






FWIW May is cognizant that the UK's union might be at stake in the event of a no deal Brexit. IMHO the only sensible scenario where no deal might occur at this point is by accident. It would be after the EU rejects an extension for some reason or another (it could very well be this one, but I'd gather May will get a long extension) and, with a gun to their faces, the MPs fail to subsequently accept a variation of May's deal and then fail to repeal article 50.

– Denis de Bernardy
Apr 9 at 7:10





1




1





Tactically, yes. The UK "should" have been actively preparing for no-deal more than 2 years ago. With adequate preparation, the government could therefore show the EU that they were ready and had nothing to fear - and therefore would have had a much stronger negotiating position. History will surely make case studies of the blunders of negotiation which have occurred over the past 2 years.

– Chris Melville
Apr 9 at 8:32





Tactically, yes. The UK "should" have been actively preparing for no-deal more than 2 years ago. With adequate preparation, the government could therefore show the EU that they were ready and had nothing to fear - and therefore would have had a much stronger negotiating position. History will surely make case studies of the blunders of negotiation which have occurred over the past 2 years.

– Chris Melville
Apr 9 at 8:32




1




1





@ChrisMelville of course, that would have forced a lot of the business no deal planning to occur earlier. Since in many cases this is "close UK arm of the business" that would have made it clear much earlier that the game was up.

– pjc50
Apr 9 at 8:52





@ChrisMelville of course, that would have forced a lot of the business no deal planning to occur earlier. Since in many cases this is "close UK arm of the business" that would have made it clear much earlier that the game was up.

– pjc50
Apr 9 at 8:52




1




1





No politician is allowed to say that the real negotiations will start the day after a theoretical "no deal" has happened. But that's the political reality of the situation.

– alephzero
Apr 9 at 9:14





No politician is allowed to say that the real negotiations will start the day after a theoretical "no deal" has happened. But that's the political reality of the situation.

– alephzero
Apr 9 at 9:14










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















19















Given the dire warnings about the dangers of a no-deal Brexit, I would have expected people to be taking precautions, such as stockpiling food




This is happening, from the FT (February 2019):




But the closely watched purchasing managers’ index compiled by IHS Markit/CIPS on Friday showed concrete evidence that stockpiling was becoming widespread — particularly in the food and drink, clothing, chemical and plastics, and electrical and electronics sectors — and was being implemented at more larger companies than small ones.







or medicine.




Same here, from the Guardian (first quote, second quote):




The government is in talks with drug companies about funding the extra costs of stockpiling and flying in vital medicines in the event of a no-deal Brexit, the health secretary has revealed.







Patients should consider stockpiling their own drugs if it looks likely the UK will leave the EU with no deal, the pharmaceuticals industry has said, telling MPs that such a scenario could be “catastrophic” for medicine supplies and necessitate emergency powers.




Why is that not happening? Are the deleterious effects of a no-deal Brexit longer term rather than shorter term?



There are many effects, both in the long term and in the short term. The stockpiling is actually only a band-aid solution, especially with regard to fresh food one can only stockpile for a few weeks (or less), according to the BBC:




Fresh food - which cannot be stockpiled - is the biggest concern. A vegetable shortage last year, driven by bad weather in southern Europe, highlighted this dependence, and led to a flurry of pictures on social media of empty supermarket shelves.




The thing with most food (and other importers, like manufacturing plants) coming into the UK is that it works with so-called just-in-time deliveries, from the BBC:




The UK's supply chains work on a "just in time" basis, meaning stock is delivered daily, not stored for long periods in warehouses.



[...]



To illustrate the complexity, Paul Martin, UK head of retail at consultancy KPMG, says 290 trucks come through Dover each day just supplying citrus fruits. He says any level of disruption, such as trucks needing to pass extra inspections, is likely to have an impact.




One of the 'problems' here is that UK imports rely heavily on the Dutch Port of Rotterdam. Indeed, many imports to the UK from Asia go via Rotterdam. Or to quote Mark Dijk, the Port's external affairs manager (as cited by the Independent):




“We are also a hub for the UK. All the deep-sea ships from China are coming into Rotterdam, and their goods are then going into shallow water ships to the UK,”



Or is everyone assuming that some kind of deal will be struck at the last minute?




No, as pointed out by Fizz, there are no-deal preparations going on on both sides of the Channel. And those preparations have been going on for a while now.






share|improve this answer























  • with the caveat that stockpiling you mention/quote is being conducted by business and/or the government.

    – Fizz
    Apr 9 at 0:27






  • 2





    @Fizz that's right, there are also examples of civilians stockpiling food and medicine, but I think the businesses provide a better example as they're making business decisions, civilian 'hoarders' are found everywhere and it's not easy to show their decisions always have merit or that they're just overreacting.

    – JJJ
    Apr 9 at 0:30



















4














The UK government has put out no-deal Brexit info for businesses. (And so has the EU.) But this is presumably not expected to be like a natural disaster, so the general public hasn't been instructed to do anything in particular, insofar, and as far as I know.



For individuals, there are instructions/information dealing with the new border procedures, EU studies programmes, EU family law, and "buying things from Europe".



The "should" part of your question probably only admits answers that are primarily opinion based, at the moment.






share|improve this answer


















  • 2





    There's not much for the general public to do, really. Even if you wanted to, say, hoard some extra medical supplies, if everyone does this (at guidance from the government, no less), it will probably raise the prices anyway. All the while raising completely unwarranted panic, making people waste money and time etc. Businesses need to prepare, people don't - they just need to know about the changes that affect them directly (as you mentioned), which mostly means things like "don't forget to get a passport if you're planning a vacation".

    – Luaan
    Apr 9 at 10:39


















2














The British should certainly be preparing for it, and I think some are, but I would be shocked if the UK actually crashes out with no deal on April 12th. Like everyone else, I'm not entirely sure what is going to happen as things seem to change almost on a daily basis. For example, last week President Macron was signalling that he'd had enough of the UK's indecision and would veto any extension to the leave date. However, almost immediately after that, the Taoiseach of Ireland Leo Varadkar said that whoever pulled such a move would "never be forgiven".



Because of that, I can't see a hard Brexit being precipitated by the EU, because their perceived self strength lies in their unity, which until now has been unshakeable. What's more likely, at least in the short term (Theresa May is asking for an extension to June 30th), is that the proverbial can will continue to be kicked down the road by the British government whilst it remains paralysed by indecision and division.



A hard Brexit can only happen now if a British government allows it to happen. There are still plenty of politicians and people in the country who want that.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




ayahuasca is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • I have personally not prepared for it, and I see it as a very unlikely event. I think talking about a no-deal exit is politicians bluffing to try and get their way, but it's not going to happen. On April 12, most likely the can will be kicked, less likely article 50 will be revoked, even less likely a no-deal exit will occur.

    – George Barwood
    Apr 9 at 8:31











  • It certainly looks that way. We could be still talking about this next year.

    – ayahuasca
    Apr 10 at 10:00


















1














The government is between a rock and a hard place.



Full scale preparations would cost a huge amount of money, and cause the public to start panicking. Imagine if the government told supermarkets to stockpile long life foods, people would go crazy buying up supplies.



Some years ago there was a problem with the supply of petrol with a similar reaction. People queuing for hours to put a few litres of fuel in their cars out of fear. People stockpiling and taking advantage with high prices.



On the other hand, if the UK does crash out of the EU it's going to need those stockpiles. The government has been trying to put contingency plans in place, but it's not been going well.



So the UK government is strongly motivated to keep its preparations low key and largely secret (e.g. possible medicine shortages, having the army on standby), but also needs to spend billions on them to ensure it doesn't have mass panic, riots and people dying...



All the while saying that no-deal is a real threat as a negotiating position with the EU and with it's own MPs and Parliament, and simultaneously trying to obey its legal obligation to avoid a no-deal crash.



It's as crazy as it sounds.






share|improve this answer





























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    19















    Given the dire warnings about the dangers of a no-deal Brexit, I would have expected people to be taking precautions, such as stockpiling food




    This is happening, from the FT (February 2019):




    But the closely watched purchasing managers’ index compiled by IHS Markit/CIPS on Friday showed concrete evidence that stockpiling was becoming widespread — particularly in the food and drink, clothing, chemical and plastics, and electrical and electronics sectors — and was being implemented at more larger companies than small ones.







    or medicine.




    Same here, from the Guardian (first quote, second quote):




    The government is in talks with drug companies about funding the extra costs of stockpiling and flying in vital medicines in the event of a no-deal Brexit, the health secretary has revealed.







    Patients should consider stockpiling their own drugs if it looks likely the UK will leave the EU with no deal, the pharmaceuticals industry has said, telling MPs that such a scenario could be “catastrophic” for medicine supplies and necessitate emergency powers.




    Why is that not happening? Are the deleterious effects of a no-deal Brexit longer term rather than shorter term?



    There are many effects, both in the long term and in the short term. The stockpiling is actually only a band-aid solution, especially with regard to fresh food one can only stockpile for a few weeks (or less), according to the BBC:




    Fresh food - which cannot be stockpiled - is the biggest concern. A vegetable shortage last year, driven by bad weather in southern Europe, highlighted this dependence, and led to a flurry of pictures on social media of empty supermarket shelves.




    The thing with most food (and other importers, like manufacturing plants) coming into the UK is that it works with so-called just-in-time deliveries, from the BBC:




    The UK's supply chains work on a "just in time" basis, meaning stock is delivered daily, not stored for long periods in warehouses.



    [...]



    To illustrate the complexity, Paul Martin, UK head of retail at consultancy KPMG, says 290 trucks come through Dover each day just supplying citrus fruits. He says any level of disruption, such as trucks needing to pass extra inspections, is likely to have an impact.




    One of the 'problems' here is that UK imports rely heavily on the Dutch Port of Rotterdam. Indeed, many imports to the UK from Asia go via Rotterdam. Or to quote Mark Dijk, the Port's external affairs manager (as cited by the Independent):




    “We are also a hub for the UK. All the deep-sea ships from China are coming into Rotterdam, and their goods are then going into shallow water ships to the UK,”



    Or is everyone assuming that some kind of deal will be struck at the last minute?




    No, as pointed out by Fizz, there are no-deal preparations going on on both sides of the Channel. And those preparations have been going on for a while now.






    share|improve this answer























    • with the caveat that stockpiling you mention/quote is being conducted by business and/or the government.

      – Fizz
      Apr 9 at 0:27






    • 2





      @Fizz that's right, there are also examples of civilians stockpiling food and medicine, but I think the businesses provide a better example as they're making business decisions, civilian 'hoarders' are found everywhere and it's not easy to show their decisions always have merit or that they're just overreacting.

      – JJJ
      Apr 9 at 0:30
















    19















    Given the dire warnings about the dangers of a no-deal Brexit, I would have expected people to be taking precautions, such as stockpiling food




    This is happening, from the FT (February 2019):




    But the closely watched purchasing managers’ index compiled by IHS Markit/CIPS on Friday showed concrete evidence that stockpiling was becoming widespread — particularly in the food and drink, clothing, chemical and plastics, and electrical and electronics sectors — and was being implemented at more larger companies than small ones.







    or medicine.




    Same here, from the Guardian (first quote, second quote):




    The government is in talks with drug companies about funding the extra costs of stockpiling and flying in vital medicines in the event of a no-deal Brexit, the health secretary has revealed.







    Patients should consider stockpiling their own drugs if it looks likely the UK will leave the EU with no deal, the pharmaceuticals industry has said, telling MPs that such a scenario could be “catastrophic” for medicine supplies and necessitate emergency powers.




    Why is that not happening? Are the deleterious effects of a no-deal Brexit longer term rather than shorter term?



    There are many effects, both in the long term and in the short term. The stockpiling is actually only a band-aid solution, especially with regard to fresh food one can only stockpile for a few weeks (or less), according to the BBC:




    Fresh food - which cannot be stockpiled - is the biggest concern. A vegetable shortage last year, driven by bad weather in southern Europe, highlighted this dependence, and led to a flurry of pictures on social media of empty supermarket shelves.




    The thing with most food (and other importers, like manufacturing plants) coming into the UK is that it works with so-called just-in-time deliveries, from the BBC:




    The UK's supply chains work on a "just in time" basis, meaning stock is delivered daily, not stored for long periods in warehouses.



    [...]



    To illustrate the complexity, Paul Martin, UK head of retail at consultancy KPMG, says 290 trucks come through Dover each day just supplying citrus fruits. He says any level of disruption, such as trucks needing to pass extra inspections, is likely to have an impact.




    One of the 'problems' here is that UK imports rely heavily on the Dutch Port of Rotterdam. Indeed, many imports to the UK from Asia go via Rotterdam. Or to quote Mark Dijk, the Port's external affairs manager (as cited by the Independent):




    “We are also a hub for the UK. All the deep-sea ships from China are coming into Rotterdam, and their goods are then going into shallow water ships to the UK,”



    Or is everyone assuming that some kind of deal will be struck at the last minute?




    No, as pointed out by Fizz, there are no-deal preparations going on on both sides of the Channel. And those preparations have been going on for a while now.






    share|improve this answer























    • with the caveat that stockpiling you mention/quote is being conducted by business and/or the government.

      – Fizz
      Apr 9 at 0:27






    • 2





      @Fizz that's right, there are also examples of civilians stockpiling food and medicine, but I think the businesses provide a better example as they're making business decisions, civilian 'hoarders' are found everywhere and it's not easy to show their decisions always have merit or that they're just overreacting.

      – JJJ
      Apr 9 at 0:30














    19












    19








    19








    Given the dire warnings about the dangers of a no-deal Brexit, I would have expected people to be taking precautions, such as stockpiling food




    This is happening, from the FT (February 2019):




    But the closely watched purchasing managers’ index compiled by IHS Markit/CIPS on Friday showed concrete evidence that stockpiling was becoming widespread — particularly in the food and drink, clothing, chemical and plastics, and electrical and electronics sectors — and was being implemented at more larger companies than small ones.







    or medicine.




    Same here, from the Guardian (first quote, second quote):




    The government is in talks with drug companies about funding the extra costs of stockpiling and flying in vital medicines in the event of a no-deal Brexit, the health secretary has revealed.







    Patients should consider stockpiling their own drugs if it looks likely the UK will leave the EU with no deal, the pharmaceuticals industry has said, telling MPs that such a scenario could be “catastrophic” for medicine supplies and necessitate emergency powers.




    Why is that not happening? Are the deleterious effects of a no-deal Brexit longer term rather than shorter term?



    There are many effects, both in the long term and in the short term. The stockpiling is actually only a band-aid solution, especially with regard to fresh food one can only stockpile for a few weeks (or less), according to the BBC:




    Fresh food - which cannot be stockpiled - is the biggest concern. A vegetable shortage last year, driven by bad weather in southern Europe, highlighted this dependence, and led to a flurry of pictures on social media of empty supermarket shelves.




    The thing with most food (and other importers, like manufacturing plants) coming into the UK is that it works with so-called just-in-time deliveries, from the BBC:




    The UK's supply chains work on a "just in time" basis, meaning stock is delivered daily, not stored for long periods in warehouses.



    [...]



    To illustrate the complexity, Paul Martin, UK head of retail at consultancy KPMG, says 290 trucks come through Dover each day just supplying citrus fruits. He says any level of disruption, such as trucks needing to pass extra inspections, is likely to have an impact.




    One of the 'problems' here is that UK imports rely heavily on the Dutch Port of Rotterdam. Indeed, many imports to the UK from Asia go via Rotterdam. Or to quote Mark Dijk, the Port's external affairs manager (as cited by the Independent):




    “We are also a hub for the UK. All the deep-sea ships from China are coming into Rotterdam, and their goods are then going into shallow water ships to the UK,”



    Or is everyone assuming that some kind of deal will be struck at the last minute?




    No, as pointed out by Fizz, there are no-deal preparations going on on both sides of the Channel. And those preparations have been going on for a while now.






    share|improve this answer














    Given the dire warnings about the dangers of a no-deal Brexit, I would have expected people to be taking precautions, such as stockpiling food




    This is happening, from the FT (February 2019):




    But the closely watched purchasing managers’ index compiled by IHS Markit/CIPS on Friday showed concrete evidence that stockpiling was becoming widespread — particularly in the food and drink, clothing, chemical and plastics, and electrical and electronics sectors — and was being implemented at more larger companies than small ones.







    or medicine.




    Same here, from the Guardian (first quote, second quote):




    The government is in talks with drug companies about funding the extra costs of stockpiling and flying in vital medicines in the event of a no-deal Brexit, the health secretary has revealed.







    Patients should consider stockpiling their own drugs if it looks likely the UK will leave the EU with no deal, the pharmaceuticals industry has said, telling MPs that such a scenario could be “catastrophic” for medicine supplies and necessitate emergency powers.




    Why is that not happening? Are the deleterious effects of a no-deal Brexit longer term rather than shorter term?



    There are many effects, both in the long term and in the short term. The stockpiling is actually only a band-aid solution, especially with regard to fresh food one can only stockpile for a few weeks (or less), according to the BBC:




    Fresh food - which cannot be stockpiled - is the biggest concern. A vegetable shortage last year, driven by bad weather in southern Europe, highlighted this dependence, and led to a flurry of pictures on social media of empty supermarket shelves.




    The thing with most food (and other importers, like manufacturing plants) coming into the UK is that it works with so-called just-in-time deliveries, from the BBC:




    The UK's supply chains work on a "just in time" basis, meaning stock is delivered daily, not stored for long periods in warehouses.



    [...]



    To illustrate the complexity, Paul Martin, UK head of retail at consultancy KPMG, says 290 trucks come through Dover each day just supplying citrus fruits. He says any level of disruption, such as trucks needing to pass extra inspections, is likely to have an impact.




    One of the 'problems' here is that UK imports rely heavily on the Dutch Port of Rotterdam. Indeed, many imports to the UK from Asia go via Rotterdam. Or to quote Mark Dijk, the Port's external affairs manager (as cited by the Independent):




    “We are also a hub for the UK. All the deep-sea ships from China are coming into Rotterdam, and their goods are then going into shallow water ships to the UK,”



    Or is everyone assuming that some kind of deal will be struck at the last minute?




    No, as pointed out by Fizz, there are no-deal preparations going on on both sides of the Channel. And those preparations have been going on for a while now.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Apr 9 at 0:07









    JJJJJJ

    6,57022457




    6,57022457












    • with the caveat that stockpiling you mention/quote is being conducted by business and/or the government.

      – Fizz
      Apr 9 at 0:27






    • 2





      @Fizz that's right, there are also examples of civilians stockpiling food and medicine, but I think the businesses provide a better example as they're making business decisions, civilian 'hoarders' are found everywhere and it's not easy to show their decisions always have merit or that they're just overreacting.

      – JJJ
      Apr 9 at 0:30


















    • with the caveat that stockpiling you mention/quote is being conducted by business and/or the government.

      – Fizz
      Apr 9 at 0:27






    • 2





      @Fizz that's right, there are also examples of civilians stockpiling food and medicine, but I think the businesses provide a better example as they're making business decisions, civilian 'hoarders' are found everywhere and it's not easy to show their decisions always have merit or that they're just overreacting.

      – JJJ
      Apr 9 at 0:30

















    with the caveat that stockpiling you mention/quote is being conducted by business and/or the government.

    – Fizz
    Apr 9 at 0:27





    with the caveat that stockpiling you mention/quote is being conducted by business and/or the government.

    – Fizz
    Apr 9 at 0:27




    2




    2





    @Fizz that's right, there are also examples of civilians stockpiling food and medicine, but I think the businesses provide a better example as they're making business decisions, civilian 'hoarders' are found everywhere and it's not easy to show their decisions always have merit or that they're just overreacting.

    – JJJ
    Apr 9 at 0:30






    @Fizz that's right, there are also examples of civilians stockpiling food and medicine, but I think the businesses provide a better example as they're making business decisions, civilian 'hoarders' are found everywhere and it's not easy to show their decisions always have merit or that they're just overreacting.

    – JJJ
    Apr 9 at 0:30












    4














    The UK government has put out no-deal Brexit info for businesses. (And so has the EU.) But this is presumably not expected to be like a natural disaster, so the general public hasn't been instructed to do anything in particular, insofar, and as far as I know.



    For individuals, there are instructions/information dealing with the new border procedures, EU studies programmes, EU family law, and "buying things from Europe".



    The "should" part of your question probably only admits answers that are primarily opinion based, at the moment.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 2





      There's not much for the general public to do, really. Even if you wanted to, say, hoard some extra medical supplies, if everyone does this (at guidance from the government, no less), it will probably raise the prices anyway. All the while raising completely unwarranted panic, making people waste money and time etc. Businesses need to prepare, people don't - they just need to know about the changes that affect them directly (as you mentioned), which mostly means things like "don't forget to get a passport if you're planning a vacation".

      – Luaan
      Apr 9 at 10:39















    4














    The UK government has put out no-deal Brexit info for businesses. (And so has the EU.) But this is presumably not expected to be like a natural disaster, so the general public hasn't been instructed to do anything in particular, insofar, and as far as I know.



    For individuals, there are instructions/information dealing with the new border procedures, EU studies programmes, EU family law, and "buying things from Europe".



    The "should" part of your question probably only admits answers that are primarily opinion based, at the moment.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 2





      There's not much for the general public to do, really. Even if you wanted to, say, hoard some extra medical supplies, if everyone does this (at guidance from the government, no less), it will probably raise the prices anyway. All the while raising completely unwarranted panic, making people waste money and time etc. Businesses need to prepare, people don't - they just need to know about the changes that affect them directly (as you mentioned), which mostly means things like "don't forget to get a passport if you're planning a vacation".

      – Luaan
      Apr 9 at 10:39













    4












    4








    4







    The UK government has put out no-deal Brexit info for businesses. (And so has the EU.) But this is presumably not expected to be like a natural disaster, so the general public hasn't been instructed to do anything in particular, insofar, and as far as I know.



    For individuals, there are instructions/information dealing with the new border procedures, EU studies programmes, EU family law, and "buying things from Europe".



    The "should" part of your question probably only admits answers that are primarily opinion based, at the moment.






    share|improve this answer













    The UK government has put out no-deal Brexit info for businesses. (And so has the EU.) But this is presumably not expected to be like a natural disaster, so the general public hasn't been instructed to do anything in particular, insofar, and as far as I know.



    For individuals, there are instructions/information dealing with the new border procedures, EU studies programmes, EU family law, and "buying things from Europe".



    The "should" part of your question probably only admits answers that are primarily opinion based, at the moment.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Apr 8 at 23:40









    FizzFizz

    15.1k23796




    15.1k23796







    • 2





      There's not much for the general public to do, really. Even if you wanted to, say, hoard some extra medical supplies, if everyone does this (at guidance from the government, no less), it will probably raise the prices anyway. All the while raising completely unwarranted panic, making people waste money and time etc. Businesses need to prepare, people don't - they just need to know about the changes that affect them directly (as you mentioned), which mostly means things like "don't forget to get a passport if you're planning a vacation".

      – Luaan
      Apr 9 at 10:39












    • 2





      There's not much for the general public to do, really. Even if you wanted to, say, hoard some extra medical supplies, if everyone does this (at guidance from the government, no less), it will probably raise the prices anyway. All the while raising completely unwarranted panic, making people waste money and time etc. Businesses need to prepare, people don't - they just need to know about the changes that affect them directly (as you mentioned), which mostly means things like "don't forget to get a passport if you're planning a vacation".

      – Luaan
      Apr 9 at 10:39







    2




    2





    There's not much for the general public to do, really. Even if you wanted to, say, hoard some extra medical supplies, if everyone does this (at guidance from the government, no less), it will probably raise the prices anyway. All the while raising completely unwarranted panic, making people waste money and time etc. Businesses need to prepare, people don't - they just need to know about the changes that affect them directly (as you mentioned), which mostly means things like "don't forget to get a passport if you're planning a vacation".

    – Luaan
    Apr 9 at 10:39





    There's not much for the general public to do, really. Even if you wanted to, say, hoard some extra medical supplies, if everyone does this (at guidance from the government, no less), it will probably raise the prices anyway. All the while raising completely unwarranted panic, making people waste money and time etc. Businesses need to prepare, people don't - they just need to know about the changes that affect them directly (as you mentioned), which mostly means things like "don't forget to get a passport if you're planning a vacation".

    – Luaan
    Apr 9 at 10:39











    2














    The British should certainly be preparing for it, and I think some are, but I would be shocked if the UK actually crashes out with no deal on April 12th. Like everyone else, I'm not entirely sure what is going to happen as things seem to change almost on a daily basis. For example, last week President Macron was signalling that he'd had enough of the UK's indecision and would veto any extension to the leave date. However, almost immediately after that, the Taoiseach of Ireland Leo Varadkar said that whoever pulled such a move would "never be forgiven".



    Because of that, I can't see a hard Brexit being precipitated by the EU, because their perceived self strength lies in their unity, which until now has been unshakeable. What's more likely, at least in the short term (Theresa May is asking for an extension to June 30th), is that the proverbial can will continue to be kicked down the road by the British government whilst it remains paralysed by indecision and division.



    A hard Brexit can only happen now if a British government allows it to happen. There are still plenty of politicians and people in the country who want that.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    ayahuasca is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.




















    • I have personally not prepared for it, and I see it as a very unlikely event. I think talking about a no-deal exit is politicians bluffing to try and get their way, but it's not going to happen. On April 12, most likely the can will be kicked, less likely article 50 will be revoked, even less likely a no-deal exit will occur.

      – George Barwood
      Apr 9 at 8:31











    • It certainly looks that way. We could be still talking about this next year.

      – ayahuasca
      Apr 10 at 10:00















    2














    The British should certainly be preparing for it, and I think some are, but I would be shocked if the UK actually crashes out with no deal on April 12th. Like everyone else, I'm not entirely sure what is going to happen as things seem to change almost on a daily basis. For example, last week President Macron was signalling that he'd had enough of the UK's indecision and would veto any extension to the leave date. However, almost immediately after that, the Taoiseach of Ireland Leo Varadkar said that whoever pulled such a move would "never be forgiven".



    Because of that, I can't see a hard Brexit being precipitated by the EU, because their perceived self strength lies in their unity, which until now has been unshakeable. What's more likely, at least in the short term (Theresa May is asking for an extension to June 30th), is that the proverbial can will continue to be kicked down the road by the British government whilst it remains paralysed by indecision and division.



    A hard Brexit can only happen now if a British government allows it to happen. There are still plenty of politicians and people in the country who want that.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    ayahuasca is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.




















    • I have personally not prepared for it, and I see it as a very unlikely event. I think talking about a no-deal exit is politicians bluffing to try and get their way, but it's not going to happen. On April 12, most likely the can will be kicked, less likely article 50 will be revoked, even less likely a no-deal exit will occur.

      – George Barwood
      Apr 9 at 8:31











    • It certainly looks that way. We could be still talking about this next year.

      – ayahuasca
      Apr 10 at 10:00













    2












    2








    2







    The British should certainly be preparing for it, and I think some are, but I would be shocked if the UK actually crashes out with no deal on April 12th. Like everyone else, I'm not entirely sure what is going to happen as things seem to change almost on a daily basis. For example, last week President Macron was signalling that he'd had enough of the UK's indecision and would veto any extension to the leave date. However, almost immediately after that, the Taoiseach of Ireland Leo Varadkar said that whoever pulled such a move would "never be forgiven".



    Because of that, I can't see a hard Brexit being precipitated by the EU, because their perceived self strength lies in their unity, which until now has been unshakeable. What's more likely, at least in the short term (Theresa May is asking for an extension to June 30th), is that the proverbial can will continue to be kicked down the road by the British government whilst it remains paralysed by indecision and division.



    A hard Brexit can only happen now if a British government allows it to happen. There are still plenty of politicians and people in the country who want that.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    ayahuasca is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.










    The British should certainly be preparing for it, and I think some are, but I would be shocked if the UK actually crashes out with no deal on April 12th. Like everyone else, I'm not entirely sure what is going to happen as things seem to change almost on a daily basis. For example, last week President Macron was signalling that he'd had enough of the UK's indecision and would veto any extension to the leave date. However, almost immediately after that, the Taoiseach of Ireland Leo Varadkar said that whoever pulled such a move would "never be forgiven".



    Because of that, I can't see a hard Brexit being precipitated by the EU, because their perceived self strength lies in their unity, which until now has been unshakeable. What's more likely, at least in the short term (Theresa May is asking for an extension to June 30th), is that the proverbial can will continue to be kicked down the road by the British government whilst it remains paralysed by indecision and division.



    A hard Brexit can only happen now if a British government allows it to happen. There are still plenty of politicians and people in the country who want that.







    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    ayahuasca is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer






    New contributor




    ayahuasca is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    answered Apr 9 at 7:04









    ayahuascaayahuasca

    1291




    1291




    New contributor




    ayahuasca is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





    New contributor





    ayahuasca is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    ayahuasca is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.












    • I have personally not prepared for it, and I see it as a very unlikely event. I think talking about a no-deal exit is politicians bluffing to try and get their way, but it's not going to happen. On April 12, most likely the can will be kicked, less likely article 50 will be revoked, even less likely a no-deal exit will occur.

      – George Barwood
      Apr 9 at 8:31











    • It certainly looks that way. We could be still talking about this next year.

      – ayahuasca
      Apr 10 at 10:00

















    • I have personally not prepared for it, and I see it as a very unlikely event. I think talking about a no-deal exit is politicians bluffing to try and get their way, but it's not going to happen. On April 12, most likely the can will be kicked, less likely article 50 will be revoked, even less likely a no-deal exit will occur.

      – George Barwood
      Apr 9 at 8:31











    • It certainly looks that way. We could be still talking about this next year.

      – ayahuasca
      Apr 10 at 10:00
















    I have personally not prepared for it, and I see it as a very unlikely event. I think talking about a no-deal exit is politicians bluffing to try and get their way, but it's not going to happen. On April 12, most likely the can will be kicked, less likely article 50 will be revoked, even less likely a no-deal exit will occur.

    – George Barwood
    Apr 9 at 8:31





    I have personally not prepared for it, and I see it as a very unlikely event. I think talking about a no-deal exit is politicians bluffing to try and get their way, but it's not going to happen. On April 12, most likely the can will be kicked, less likely article 50 will be revoked, even less likely a no-deal exit will occur.

    – George Barwood
    Apr 9 at 8:31













    It certainly looks that way. We could be still talking about this next year.

    – ayahuasca
    Apr 10 at 10:00





    It certainly looks that way. We could be still talking about this next year.

    – ayahuasca
    Apr 10 at 10:00











    1














    The government is between a rock and a hard place.



    Full scale preparations would cost a huge amount of money, and cause the public to start panicking. Imagine if the government told supermarkets to stockpile long life foods, people would go crazy buying up supplies.



    Some years ago there was a problem with the supply of petrol with a similar reaction. People queuing for hours to put a few litres of fuel in their cars out of fear. People stockpiling and taking advantage with high prices.



    On the other hand, if the UK does crash out of the EU it's going to need those stockpiles. The government has been trying to put contingency plans in place, but it's not been going well.



    So the UK government is strongly motivated to keep its preparations low key and largely secret (e.g. possible medicine shortages, having the army on standby), but also needs to spend billions on them to ensure it doesn't have mass panic, riots and people dying...



    All the while saying that no-deal is a real threat as a negotiating position with the EU and with it's own MPs and Parliament, and simultaneously trying to obey its legal obligation to avoid a no-deal crash.



    It's as crazy as it sounds.






    share|improve this answer



























      1














      The government is between a rock and a hard place.



      Full scale preparations would cost a huge amount of money, and cause the public to start panicking. Imagine if the government told supermarkets to stockpile long life foods, people would go crazy buying up supplies.



      Some years ago there was a problem with the supply of petrol with a similar reaction. People queuing for hours to put a few litres of fuel in their cars out of fear. People stockpiling and taking advantage with high prices.



      On the other hand, if the UK does crash out of the EU it's going to need those stockpiles. The government has been trying to put contingency plans in place, but it's not been going well.



      So the UK government is strongly motivated to keep its preparations low key and largely secret (e.g. possible medicine shortages, having the army on standby), but also needs to spend billions on them to ensure it doesn't have mass panic, riots and people dying...



      All the while saying that no-deal is a real threat as a negotiating position with the EU and with it's own MPs and Parliament, and simultaneously trying to obey its legal obligation to avoid a no-deal crash.



      It's as crazy as it sounds.






      share|improve this answer

























        1












        1








        1







        The government is between a rock and a hard place.



        Full scale preparations would cost a huge amount of money, and cause the public to start panicking. Imagine if the government told supermarkets to stockpile long life foods, people would go crazy buying up supplies.



        Some years ago there was a problem with the supply of petrol with a similar reaction. People queuing for hours to put a few litres of fuel in their cars out of fear. People stockpiling and taking advantage with high prices.



        On the other hand, if the UK does crash out of the EU it's going to need those stockpiles. The government has been trying to put contingency plans in place, but it's not been going well.



        So the UK government is strongly motivated to keep its preparations low key and largely secret (e.g. possible medicine shortages, having the army on standby), but also needs to spend billions on them to ensure it doesn't have mass panic, riots and people dying...



        All the while saying that no-deal is a real threat as a negotiating position with the EU and with it's own MPs and Parliament, and simultaneously trying to obey its legal obligation to avoid a no-deal crash.



        It's as crazy as it sounds.






        share|improve this answer













        The government is between a rock and a hard place.



        Full scale preparations would cost a huge amount of money, and cause the public to start panicking. Imagine if the government told supermarkets to stockpile long life foods, people would go crazy buying up supplies.



        Some years ago there was a problem with the supply of petrol with a similar reaction. People queuing for hours to put a few litres of fuel in their cars out of fear. People stockpiling and taking advantage with high prices.



        On the other hand, if the UK does crash out of the EU it's going to need those stockpiles. The government has been trying to put contingency plans in place, but it's not been going well.



        So the UK government is strongly motivated to keep its preparations low key and largely secret (e.g. possible medicine shortages, having the army on standby), but also needs to spend billions on them to ensure it doesn't have mass panic, riots and people dying...



        All the while saying that no-deal is a real threat as a negotiating position with the EU and with it's own MPs and Parliament, and simultaneously trying to obey its legal obligation to avoid a no-deal crash.



        It's as crazy as it sounds.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Apr 9 at 9:07









        useruser

        11.2k32644




        11.2k32644













            Popular posts from this blog

            Wikipedia:Vital articles Мазмуну Biography - Өмүр баян Philosophy and psychology - Философия жана психология Religion - Дин Social sciences - Коомдук илимдер Language and literature - Тил жана адабият Science - Илим Technology - Технология Arts and recreation - Искусство жана эс алуу History and geography - Тарых жана география Навигация менюсу

            Bruxelas-Capital Índice Historia | Composición | Situación lingüística | Clima | Cidades irmandadas | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióneO uso das linguas en Bruxelas e a situación do neerlandés"Rexión de Bruxelas Capital"o orixinalSitio da rexiónPáxina de Bruselas no sitio da Oficina de Promoción Turística de Valonia e BruxelasMapa Interactivo da Rexión de Bruxelas-CapitaleeWorldCat332144929079854441105155190212ID28008674080552-90000 0001 0666 3698n94104302ID540940339365017018237

            What should I write in an apology letter, since I have decided not to join a company after accepting an offer letterShould I keep looking after accepting a job offer?What should I do when I've been verbally told I would get an offer letter, but still haven't gotten one after 4 weeks?Do I accept an offer from a company that I am not likely to join?New job hasn't confirmed starting date and I want to give current employer as much notice as possibleHow should I address my manager in my resignation letter?HR delayed background verification, now jobless as resignedNo email communication after accepting a formal written offer. How should I phrase the call?What should I do if after receiving a verbal offer letter I am informed that my written job offer is put on hold due to some internal issues?Should I inform the current employer that I am about to resign within 1-2 weeks since I have signed the offer letter and waiting for visa?What company will do, if I send their offer letter to another company