OpenSwan IPsec tunnel to Azure Gateway is established but unable to connectStrongSwan - Windows 7 0 IPSec IKEv2 connection problemsOpenSwan IPSec phase #2 complicationsConnecting to IPSec/L2tp with OpenSwan/xl2tpd from Windows7 to Amazon EC2Cannot connect to Windows Azure virtual network with netgear routerpfSense IPsec VPN setup (Log error: racoon: INFO: unsupported PF_KEY message REGISTER)Cisco IOS Router and Azure VPN - tunnel established, but traffic is not flowingConfigure ipsec vpn tunnel (network to network with IKE with preshared key) on Centos 6 with openswanStrongswan VPN tunnel between two AWS instances won't connectPoor IPsec over GRE performancesSite to Site IPSec between pfSense and Cisco ASA

Multi tool use
Multi tool use

Is this food a bread or a loaf?

Are cabin dividers used to "hide" the flex of the airplane?

Finding files for which a command fails

What are the advantages and disadvantages of running one shots compared to campaigns?

Is it legal to have the "// (c) 2019 John Smith" header in all files when there are hundreds of contributors?

Is a vector space a subspace of itself?

When blogging recipes, how can I support both readers who want the narrative/journey and ones who want the printer-friendly recipe?

Is there a name of the flying bionic bird?

Can a planet have a different gravitational pull depending on its location in orbit around its sun?

Why is the design of haulage companies so “special”?

Doomsday-clock for my fantasy planet

"My colleague's body is amazing"

Lied on resume at previous job

Landing in very high winds

Calculate Levenshtein distance between two strings in Python

What happens when a metallic dragon and a chromatic dragon mate?

Does it makes sense to buy a new cycle to learn riding?

Pristine Bit Checking

Is there a familial term for apples and pears?

Is ipsum/ipsa/ipse a third person pronoun, or can it serve other functions?

Is "plugging out" electronic devices an American expression?

Could Giant Ground Sloths have been a good pack animal for the ancient Mayans?

If a centaur druid Wild Shapes into a Giant Elk, do their Charge features stack?

How to move the player while also allowing forces to affect it



OpenSwan IPsec tunnel to Azure Gateway is established but unable to connect


StrongSwan - Windows 7 0 IPSec IKEv2 connection problemsOpenSwan IPSec phase #2 complicationsConnecting to IPSec/L2tp with OpenSwan/xl2tpd from Windows7 to Amazon EC2Cannot connect to Windows Azure virtual network with netgear routerpfSense IPsec VPN setup (Log error: racoon: INFO: unsupported PF_KEY message REGISTER)Cisco IOS Router and Azure VPN - tunnel established, but traffic is not flowingConfigure ipsec vpn tunnel (network to network with IKE with preshared key) on Centos 6 with openswanStrongswan VPN tunnel between two AWS instances won't connectPoor IPsec over GRE performancesSite to Site IPSec between pfSense and Cisco ASA






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








2















I am currently trying to set up a IPsec tunnel between my on-premise center and to the VPN in Azure. I am setting up OpenSwan 2.6.23 on an Ubuntu Lucid box, and my box is behind a NAT.



ipsec.conf



config setup
nat_traversal=yes
protostack=netkey
interfaces=%defaultroute
klipsdebug=none
plutodebug=none

conn to-azure
authby=secret
auto=start
type=tunnel

left=10.0.210.22
leftid=<my-public-ip>
leftnexthop=%defaultroute
leftsubnet=10.0.210.0/24

right=<azure-gateway-public-ip>
rightsubnet=10.13.0.0/16
rightnexthop=%defaultroute

ike=aes256-sha1-modp1024
ikev2=insist
phase2=esp
phase2alg=aes256-sha1
pfs=no


ipsec.secrets



<my-public-ip> <azure-gateway-public-ip>: PSK "supersecurepassword"


This is what I receive when I start ipsec, and from what I understand is that it shows the tunnel is established.



000 "to-azure": 10.0.210.0/24===10.0.210.22<10.0.210.22>[<my-public-ip>,+S=C]---10.0.210.3...10.0.210.3---<azure-gateway-public-ip><<azure-gateway-public-ip>>[+S=C]===10.13.0.0/16; erouted; eroute owner: #2
000 "to-azure": myip=unset; hisip=unset;
000 "to-azure": ike_life: 3600s; ipsec_life: 28800s; rekey_margin: 540s; rekey_fuzz: 100%; keyingtries: 0
000 "to-azure": policy: PSK+ENCRYPT+TUNNEL+UP+!IKEv1+IKEv2ALLOW+IKEv2Init+lKOD+rKOD; prio: 24,16; interface: eth0;
000 "to-azure": newest ISAKMP SA: #1; newest IPsec SA: #2;
000 "to-azure": IKE algorithms wanted: AES_CBC(7)_256-SHA1(2)-MODP1024(2); flags=-strict
000 "to-azure": IKE algorithms found: AES_CBC(7)_256-SHA1(2)_160-2,
000 "to-azure": IKE algorithm newest: _256-SHA1-MODP1024
000 "to-azure": ESP algorithms wanted: AES(12)_256-SHA1(2); flags=-strict
000 "to-azure": ESP algorithms loaded: AES(12)_256-SHA1(2)_160
000 "to-azure": ESP algorithm newest: AES_256-HMAC_SHA1; pfsgroup=<N/A>
000
000 #2: "to-azure":500 STATE_PARENT_I3 (PARENT SA established); EVENT_SA_REPLACE in 27760s; newest IPSEC; eroute owner; nodpd; idle; import:admin initiate
000 #1: "to-azure":500 STATE_PARENT_I3 (PARENT SA established); EVENT_SA_REPLACE in 3484s; newest ISAKMP; nodpd; idle; import:admin initiate
000


However, when I check the auth.logs it shows the following:



added connection description "to-azure"
listening for IKE messages
NAT-Traversal: Trying new style NAT-T
NAT-Traversal: ESPINUDP(1) setup failed for new style NAT-T family IPv4 (errno=19)
NAT-Traversal: Trying old style NAT-T
adding interface eth0/eth0 10.0.210.22:500
adding interface eth0/eth0 10.0.210.22:4500
adding interface lo/lo 127.0.0.1:500
adding interface lo/lo 127.0.0.1:4500
adding interface lo/lo ::1:500
loading secrets from "/etc/ipsec.secrets"
"to-azure" #1: initiating v2 parent SA
"to-azure" #1: transition from state STATE_IKEv2_START to state STATE_PARENT_I1
"to-azure" #1: STATE_PARENT_I1: sent v2I1, expected v2R1
"to-azure" #2: transition from state STATE_PARENT_I1 to state STATE_PARENT_I2
"to-azure" #2: STATE_PARENT_I2: sent v2I2, expected v2R2 auth=IKEv2 cipher=aes_256 integ=sha1 prf=oakley_sha group=modp1024
packet from <azure-gateway-public-ip>: IKEv2 mode peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: '<azure-gateway-public-ip>'
"to-azure" #2: transition from state STATE_PARENT_I2 to state STATE_PARENT_I3
"to-azure" #2: negotiated tunnel [10.0.210.0,10.0.210.255] -> [10.13.0.0,10.13.255.255]
"to-azure" #2: STATE_PARENT_I3: PARENT SA established tunnel mode ESP=>0xeebf6740 <0x4d67c332 xfrm=AES_256-HMAC_SHA1 NATOA=none NATD=none DPD=none
| releasing whack for #2 (sock=-1)
| releasing whack for #1 (sock=-1)
packet from <azure-gateway-public-ip>: received packet that was neither (I)nitiator or (R)esponder, msgid=0


ipsec verify shows that everything is OK, with OE disabled. Why am I still unable to receive the packet from my Azure instance?










share|improve this question






















  • Could you ping the private address of your Azure VM from the Linux box?

    – Steven Lee - MSFT
    Apr 28 '17 at 8:50











  • @StevenLee-MSFT No I could not

    – leeeennyy
    May 2 '17 at 5:09











  • Then it seems that the VPN tunnel has not been established correctly. As I have mentioned, please try to check the log from Azure side.

    – Steven Lee - MSFT
    May 2 '17 at 6:50


















2















I am currently trying to set up a IPsec tunnel between my on-premise center and to the VPN in Azure. I am setting up OpenSwan 2.6.23 on an Ubuntu Lucid box, and my box is behind a NAT.



ipsec.conf



config setup
nat_traversal=yes
protostack=netkey
interfaces=%defaultroute
klipsdebug=none
plutodebug=none

conn to-azure
authby=secret
auto=start
type=tunnel

left=10.0.210.22
leftid=<my-public-ip>
leftnexthop=%defaultroute
leftsubnet=10.0.210.0/24

right=<azure-gateway-public-ip>
rightsubnet=10.13.0.0/16
rightnexthop=%defaultroute

ike=aes256-sha1-modp1024
ikev2=insist
phase2=esp
phase2alg=aes256-sha1
pfs=no


ipsec.secrets



<my-public-ip> <azure-gateway-public-ip>: PSK "supersecurepassword"


This is what I receive when I start ipsec, and from what I understand is that it shows the tunnel is established.



000 "to-azure": 10.0.210.0/24===10.0.210.22<10.0.210.22>[<my-public-ip>,+S=C]---10.0.210.3...10.0.210.3---<azure-gateway-public-ip><<azure-gateway-public-ip>>[+S=C]===10.13.0.0/16; erouted; eroute owner: #2
000 "to-azure": myip=unset; hisip=unset;
000 "to-azure": ike_life: 3600s; ipsec_life: 28800s; rekey_margin: 540s; rekey_fuzz: 100%; keyingtries: 0
000 "to-azure": policy: PSK+ENCRYPT+TUNNEL+UP+!IKEv1+IKEv2ALLOW+IKEv2Init+lKOD+rKOD; prio: 24,16; interface: eth0;
000 "to-azure": newest ISAKMP SA: #1; newest IPsec SA: #2;
000 "to-azure": IKE algorithms wanted: AES_CBC(7)_256-SHA1(2)-MODP1024(2); flags=-strict
000 "to-azure": IKE algorithms found: AES_CBC(7)_256-SHA1(2)_160-2,
000 "to-azure": IKE algorithm newest: _256-SHA1-MODP1024
000 "to-azure": ESP algorithms wanted: AES(12)_256-SHA1(2); flags=-strict
000 "to-azure": ESP algorithms loaded: AES(12)_256-SHA1(2)_160
000 "to-azure": ESP algorithm newest: AES_256-HMAC_SHA1; pfsgroup=<N/A>
000
000 #2: "to-azure":500 STATE_PARENT_I3 (PARENT SA established); EVENT_SA_REPLACE in 27760s; newest IPSEC; eroute owner; nodpd; idle; import:admin initiate
000 #1: "to-azure":500 STATE_PARENT_I3 (PARENT SA established); EVENT_SA_REPLACE in 3484s; newest ISAKMP; nodpd; idle; import:admin initiate
000


However, when I check the auth.logs it shows the following:



added connection description "to-azure"
listening for IKE messages
NAT-Traversal: Trying new style NAT-T
NAT-Traversal: ESPINUDP(1) setup failed for new style NAT-T family IPv4 (errno=19)
NAT-Traversal: Trying old style NAT-T
adding interface eth0/eth0 10.0.210.22:500
adding interface eth0/eth0 10.0.210.22:4500
adding interface lo/lo 127.0.0.1:500
adding interface lo/lo 127.0.0.1:4500
adding interface lo/lo ::1:500
loading secrets from "/etc/ipsec.secrets"
"to-azure" #1: initiating v2 parent SA
"to-azure" #1: transition from state STATE_IKEv2_START to state STATE_PARENT_I1
"to-azure" #1: STATE_PARENT_I1: sent v2I1, expected v2R1
"to-azure" #2: transition from state STATE_PARENT_I1 to state STATE_PARENT_I2
"to-azure" #2: STATE_PARENT_I2: sent v2I2, expected v2R2 auth=IKEv2 cipher=aes_256 integ=sha1 prf=oakley_sha group=modp1024
packet from <azure-gateway-public-ip>: IKEv2 mode peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: '<azure-gateway-public-ip>'
"to-azure" #2: transition from state STATE_PARENT_I2 to state STATE_PARENT_I3
"to-azure" #2: negotiated tunnel [10.0.210.0,10.0.210.255] -> [10.13.0.0,10.13.255.255]
"to-azure" #2: STATE_PARENT_I3: PARENT SA established tunnel mode ESP=>0xeebf6740 <0x4d67c332 xfrm=AES_256-HMAC_SHA1 NATOA=none NATD=none DPD=none
| releasing whack for #2 (sock=-1)
| releasing whack for #1 (sock=-1)
packet from <azure-gateway-public-ip>: received packet that was neither (I)nitiator or (R)esponder, msgid=0


ipsec verify shows that everything is OK, with OE disabled. Why am I still unable to receive the packet from my Azure instance?










share|improve this question






















  • Could you ping the private address of your Azure VM from the Linux box?

    – Steven Lee - MSFT
    Apr 28 '17 at 8:50











  • @StevenLee-MSFT No I could not

    – leeeennyy
    May 2 '17 at 5:09











  • Then it seems that the VPN tunnel has not been established correctly. As I have mentioned, please try to check the log from Azure side.

    – Steven Lee - MSFT
    May 2 '17 at 6:50














2












2








2








I am currently trying to set up a IPsec tunnel between my on-premise center and to the VPN in Azure. I am setting up OpenSwan 2.6.23 on an Ubuntu Lucid box, and my box is behind a NAT.



ipsec.conf



config setup
nat_traversal=yes
protostack=netkey
interfaces=%defaultroute
klipsdebug=none
plutodebug=none

conn to-azure
authby=secret
auto=start
type=tunnel

left=10.0.210.22
leftid=<my-public-ip>
leftnexthop=%defaultroute
leftsubnet=10.0.210.0/24

right=<azure-gateway-public-ip>
rightsubnet=10.13.0.0/16
rightnexthop=%defaultroute

ike=aes256-sha1-modp1024
ikev2=insist
phase2=esp
phase2alg=aes256-sha1
pfs=no


ipsec.secrets



<my-public-ip> <azure-gateway-public-ip>: PSK "supersecurepassword"


This is what I receive when I start ipsec, and from what I understand is that it shows the tunnel is established.



000 "to-azure": 10.0.210.0/24===10.0.210.22<10.0.210.22>[<my-public-ip>,+S=C]---10.0.210.3...10.0.210.3---<azure-gateway-public-ip><<azure-gateway-public-ip>>[+S=C]===10.13.0.0/16; erouted; eroute owner: #2
000 "to-azure": myip=unset; hisip=unset;
000 "to-azure": ike_life: 3600s; ipsec_life: 28800s; rekey_margin: 540s; rekey_fuzz: 100%; keyingtries: 0
000 "to-azure": policy: PSK+ENCRYPT+TUNNEL+UP+!IKEv1+IKEv2ALLOW+IKEv2Init+lKOD+rKOD; prio: 24,16; interface: eth0;
000 "to-azure": newest ISAKMP SA: #1; newest IPsec SA: #2;
000 "to-azure": IKE algorithms wanted: AES_CBC(7)_256-SHA1(2)-MODP1024(2); flags=-strict
000 "to-azure": IKE algorithms found: AES_CBC(7)_256-SHA1(2)_160-2,
000 "to-azure": IKE algorithm newest: _256-SHA1-MODP1024
000 "to-azure": ESP algorithms wanted: AES(12)_256-SHA1(2); flags=-strict
000 "to-azure": ESP algorithms loaded: AES(12)_256-SHA1(2)_160
000 "to-azure": ESP algorithm newest: AES_256-HMAC_SHA1; pfsgroup=<N/A>
000
000 #2: "to-azure":500 STATE_PARENT_I3 (PARENT SA established); EVENT_SA_REPLACE in 27760s; newest IPSEC; eroute owner; nodpd; idle; import:admin initiate
000 #1: "to-azure":500 STATE_PARENT_I3 (PARENT SA established); EVENT_SA_REPLACE in 3484s; newest ISAKMP; nodpd; idle; import:admin initiate
000


However, when I check the auth.logs it shows the following:



added connection description "to-azure"
listening for IKE messages
NAT-Traversal: Trying new style NAT-T
NAT-Traversal: ESPINUDP(1) setup failed for new style NAT-T family IPv4 (errno=19)
NAT-Traversal: Trying old style NAT-T
adding interface eth0/eth0 10.0.210.22:500
adding interface eth0/eth0 10.0.210.22:4500
adding interface lo/lo 127.0.0.1:500
adding interface lo/lo 127.0.0.1:4500
adding interface lo/lo ::1:500
loading secrets from "/etc/ipsec.secrets"
"to-azure" #1: initiating v2 parent SA
"to-azure" #1: transition from state STATE_IKEv2_START to state STATE_PARENT_I1
"to-azure" #1: STATE_PARENT_I1: sent v2I1, expected v2R1
"to-azure" #2: transition from state STATE_PARENT_I1 to state STATE_PARENT_I2
"to-azure" #2: STATE_PARENT_I2: sent v2I2, expected v2R2 auth=IKEv2 cipher=aes_256 integ=sha1 prf=oakley_sha group=modp1024
packet from <azure-gateway-public-ip>: IKEv2 mode peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: '<azure-gateway-public-ip>'
"to-azure" #2: transition from state STATE_PARENT_I2 to state STATE_PARENT_I3
"to-azure" #2: negotiated tunnel [10.0.210.0,10.0.210.255] -> [10.13.0.0,10.13.255.255]
"to-azure" #2: STATE_PARENT_I3: PARENT SA established tunnel mode ESP=>0xeebf6740 <0x4d67c332 xfrm=AES_256-HMAC_SHA1 NATOA=none NATD=none DPD=none
| releasing whack for #2 (sock=-1)
| releasing whack for #1 (sock=-1)
packet from <azure-gateway-public-ip>: received packet that was neither (I)nitiator or (R)esponder, msgid=0


ipsec verify shows that everything is OK, with OE disabled. Why am I still unable to receive the packet from my Azure instance?










share|improve this question














I am currently trying to set up a IPsec tunnel between my on-premise center and to the VPN in Azure. I am setting up OpenSwan 2.6.23 on an Ubuntu Lucid box, and my box is behind a NAT.



ipsec.conf



config setup
nat_traversal=yes
protostack=netkey
interfaces=%defaultroute
klipsdebug=none
plutodebug=none

conn to-azure
authby=secret
auto=start
type=tunnel

left=10.0.210.22
leftid=<my-public-ip>
leftnexthop=%defaultroute
leftsubnet=10.0.210.0/24

right=<azure-gateway-public-ip>
rightsubnet=10.13.0.0/16
rightnexthop=%defaultroute

ike=aes256-sha1-modp1024
ikev2=insist
phase2=esp
phase2alg=aes256-sha1
pfs=no


ipsec.secrets



<my-public-ip> <azure-gateway-public-ip>: PSK "supersecurepassword"


This is what I receive when I start ipsec, and from what I understand is that it shows the tunnel is established.



000 "to-azure": 10.0.210.0/24===10.0.210.22<10.0.210.22>[<my-public-ip>,+S=C]---10.0.210.3...10.0.210.3---<azure-gateway-public-ip><<azure-gateway-public-ip>>[+S=C]===10.13.0.0/16; erouted; eroute owner: #2
000 "to-azure": myip=unset; hisip=unset;
000 "to-azure": ike_life: 3600s; ipsec_life: 28800s; rekey_margin: 540s; rekey_fuzz: 100%; keyingtries: 0
000 "to-azure": policy: PSK+ENCRYPT+TUNNEL+UP+!IKEv1+IKEv2ALLOW+IKEv2Init+lKOD+rKOD; prio: 24,16; interface: eth0;
000 "to-azure": newest ISAKMP SA: #1; newest IPsec SA: #2;
000 "to-azure": IKE algorithms wanted: AES_CBC(7)_256-SHA1(2)-MODP1024(2); flags=-strict
000 "to-azure": IKE algorithms found: AES_CBC(7)_256-SHA1(2)_160-2,
000 "to-azure": IKE algorithm newest: _256-SHA1-MODP1024
000 "to-azure": ESP algorithms wanted: AES(12)_256-SHA1(2); flags=-strict
000 "to-azure": ESP algorithms loaded: AES(12)_256-SHA1(2)_160
000 "to-azure": ESP algorithm newest: AES_256-HMAC_SHA1; pfsgroup=<N/A>
000
000 #2: "to-azure":500 STATE_PARENT_I3 (PARENT SA established); EVENT_SA_REPLACE in 27760s; newest IPSEC; eroute owner; nodpd; idle; import:admin initiate
000 #1: "to-azure":500 STATE_PARENT_I3 (PARENT SA established); EVENT_SA_REPLACE in 3484s; newest ISAKMP; nodpd; idle; import:admin initiate
000


However, when I check the auth.logs it shows the following:



added connection description "to-azure"
listening for IKE messages
NAT-Traversal: Trying new style NAT-T
NAT-Traversal: ESPINUDP(1) setup failed for new style NAT-T family IPv4 (errno=19)
NAT-Traversal: Trying old style NAT-T
adding interface eth0/eth0 10.0.210.22:500
adding interface eth0/eth0 10.0.210.22:4500
adding interface lo/lo 127.0.0.1:500
adding interface lo/lo 127.0.0.1:4500
adding interface lo/lo ::1:500
loading secrets from "/etc/ipsec.secrets"
"to-azure" #1: initiating v2 parent SA
"to-azure" #1: transition from state STATE_IKEv2_START to state STATE_PARENT_I1
"to-azure" #1: STATE_PARENT_I1: sent v2I1, expected v2R1
"to-azure" #2: transition from state STATE_PARENT_I1 to state STATE_PARENT_I2
"to-azure" #2: STATE_PARENT_I2: sent v2I2, expected v2R2 auth=IKEv2 cipher=aes_256 integ=sha1 prf=oakley_sha group=modp1024
packet from <azure-gateway-public-ip>: IKEv2 mode peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: '<azure-gateway-public-ip>'
"to-azure" #2: transition from state STATE_PARENT_I2 to state STATE_PARENT_I3
"to-azure" #2: negotiated tunnel [10.0.210.0,10.0.210.255] -> [10.13.0.0,10.13.255.255]
"to-azure" #2: STATE_PARENT_I3: PARENT SA established tunnel mode ESP=>0xeebf6740 <0x4d67c332 xfrm=AES_256-HMAC_SHA1 NATOA=none NATD=none DPD=none
| releasing whack for #2 (sock=-1)
| releasing whack for #1 (sock=-1)
packet from <azure-gateway-public-ip>: received packet that was neither (I)nitiator or (R)esponder, msgid=0


ipsec verify shows that everything is OK, with OE disabled. Why am I still unable to receive the packet from my Azure instance?







linux azure ipsec openswan






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Apr 27 '17 at 4:53









leeeennyyleeeennyy

182




182












  • Could you ping the private address of your Azure VM from the Linux box?

    – Steven Lee - MSFT
    Apr 28 '17 at 8:50











  • @StevenLee-MSFT No I could not

    – leeeennyy
    May 2 '17 at 5:09











  • Then it seems that the VPN tunnel has not been established correctly. As I have mentioned, please try to check the log from Azure side.

    – Steven Lee - MSFT
    May 2 '17 at 6:50


















  • Could you ping the private address of your Azure VM from the Linux box?

    – Steven Lee - MSFT
    Apr 28 '17 at 8:50











  • @StevenLee-MSFT No I could not

    – leeeennyy
    May 2 '17 at 5:09











  • Then it seems that the VPN tunnel has not been established correctly. As I have mentioned, please try to check the log from Azure side.

    – Steven Lee - MSFT
    May 2 '17 at 6:50

















Could you ping the private address of your Azure VM from the Linux box?

– Steven Lee - MSFT
Apr 28 '17 at 8:50





Could you ping the private address of your Azure VM from the Linux box?

– Steven Lee - MSFT
Apr 28 '17 at 8:50













@StevenLee-MSFT No I could not

– leeeennyy
May 2 '17 at 5:09





@StevenLee-MSFT No I could not

– leeeennyy
May 2 '17 at 5:09













Then it seems that the VPN tunnel has not been established correctly. As I have mentioned, please try to check the log from Azure side.

– Steven Lee - MSFT
May 2 '17 at 6:50






Then it seems that the VPN tunnel has not been established correctly. As I have mentioned, please try to check the log from Azure side.

– Steven Lee - MSFT
May 2 '17 at 6:50











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














I tried your IPsec.conf file on my CentOS. It works for me. The version of
libreswan installed on my box is 3.15.



To troubleshoot this issue, please follow the steps below:



Verify if the VPN connection has been established correctly. Please try to get the log from Azure VPN Gateway. Here is a good guide: Step-by-Step: Capturing Azure Resource Manager (ARM) VNET Gateway Diagnostic Logs



If the connection has been established properly, then please make sure that routing function has been enabled on the Linux box and the proper route entries have been advertised to your local network.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "2"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f846809%2fopenswan-ipsec-tunnel-to-azure-gateway-is-established-but-unable-to-connect%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    I tried your IPsec.conf file on my CentOS. It works for me. The version of
    libreswan installed on my box is 3.15.



    To troubleshoot this issue, please follow the steps below:



    Verify if the VPN connection has been established correctly. Please try to get the log from Azure VPN Gateway. Here is a good guide: Step-by-Step: Capturing Azure Resource Manager (ARM) VNET Gateway Diagnostic Logs



    If the connection has been established properly, then please make sure that routing function has been enabled on the Linux box and the proper route entries have been advertised to your local network.






    share|improve this answer



























      0














      I tried your IPsec.conf file on my CentOS. It works for me. The version of
      libreswan installed on my box is 3.15.



      To troubleshoot this issue, please follow the steps below:



      Verify if the VPN connection has been established correctly. Please try to get the log from Azure VPN Gateway. Here is a good guide: Step-by-Step: Capturing Azure Resource Manager (ARM) VNET Gateway Diagnostic Logs



      If the connection has been established properly, then please make sure that routing function has been enabled on the Linux box and the proper route entries have been advertised to your local network.






      share|improve this answer

























        0












        0








        0







        I tried your IPsec.conf file on my CentOS. It works for me. The version of
        libreswan installed on my box is 3.15.



        To troubleshoot this issue, please follow the steps below:



        Verify if the VPN connection has been established correctly. Please try to get the log from Azure VPN Gateway. Here is a good guide: Step-by-Step: Capturing Azure Resource Manager (ARM) VNET Gateway Diagnostic Logs



        If the connection has been established properly, then please make sure that routing function has been enabled on the Linux box and the proper route entries have been advertised to your local network.






        share|improve this answer













        I tried your IPsec.conf file on my CentOS. It works for me. The version of
        libreswan installed on my box is 3.15.



        To troubleshoot this issue, please follow the steps below:



        Verify if the VPN connection has been established correctly. Please try to get the log from Azure VPN Gateway. Here is a good guide: Step-by-Step: Capturing Azure Resource Manager (ARM) VNET Gateway Diagnostic Logs



        If the connection has been established properly, then please make sure that routing function has been enabled on the Linux box and the proper route entries have been advertised to your local network.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Apr 28 '17 at 8:51









        Steven Lee - MSFTSteven Lee - MSFT

        65538




        65538



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f846809%2fopenswan-ipsec-tunnel-to-azure-gateway-is-established-but-unable-to-connect%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            SQvoACC218Yoywk6yL05WUAg hexU2,icWbeLTc6ttX HjxWqCr
            ewGWlAfXT,77VqQWiTTOyrT,CarDypFU

            Popular posts from this blog

            RemoteApp sporadic failureWindows 2008 RemoteAPP client disconnects within a matter of minutesWhat is the minimum version of RDP supported by Server 2012 RDS?How to configure a Remoteapp server to increase stabilityMicrosoft RemoteApp Active SessionRDWeb TS connection broken for some users post RemoteApp certificate changeRemote Desktop Licensing, RemoteAPPRDS 2012 R2 some users are not able to logon after changed date and time on Connection BrokersWhat happens during Remote Desktop logon, and is there any logging?After installing RDS on WinServer 2016 I still can only connect with two users?RD Connection via RDGW to Session host is not connecting

            Vilaño, A Laracha Índice Patrimonio | Lugares e parroquias | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación43°14′52″N 8°36′03″O / 43.24775, -8.60070

            Cegueira Índice Epidemioloxía | Deficiencia visual | Tipos de cegueira | Principais causas de cegueira | Tratamento | Técnicas de adaptación e axudas | Vida dos cegos | Primeiros auxilios | Crenzas respecto das persoas cegas | Crenzas das persoas cegas | O neno deficiente visual | Aspectos psicolóxicos da cegueira | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación54.054.154.436928256blindnessDicionario da Real Academia GalegaPortal das Palabras"International Standards: Visual Standards — Aspects and Ranges of Vision Loss with Emphasis on Population Surveys.""Visual impairment and blindness""Presentan un plan para previr a cegueira"o orixinalACCDV Associació Catalana de Cecs i Disminuïts Visuals - PMFTrachoma"Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis"1844137110.1056/NEJMoa0802268Cans guía - os mellores amigos dos cegosArquivadoEscola de cans guía para cegos en Mortágua, PortugalArquivado"Tecnología para ciegos y deficientes visuales. Recopilación de recursos gratuitos en la Red""Colorino""‘COL.diesis’, escuchar los sonidos del color""COL.diesis: Transforming Colour into Melody and Implementing the Result in a Colour Sensor Device"o orixinal"Sistema de desarrollo de sinestesia color-sonido para invidentes utilizando un protocolo de audio""Enseñanza táctil - geometría y color. Juegos didácticos para niños ciegos y videntes""Sistema Constanz"L'ocupació laboral dels cecs a l'Estat espanyol està pràcticament equiparada a la de les persones amb visió, entrevista amb Pedro ZuritaONCE (Organización Nacional de Cegos de España)Prevención da cegueiraDescrición de deficiencias visuais (Disc@pnet)Braillín, un boneco atractivo para calquera neno, con ou sen discapacidade, que permite familiarizarse co sistema de escritura e lectura brailleAxudas Técnicas36838ID00897494007150-90057129528256DOID:1432HP:0000618D001766C10.597.751.941.162C97109C0155020