OpenSwan IPsec tunnel to Azure Gateway is established but unable to connectStrongSwan - Windows 7 0 IPSec IKEv2 connection problemsOpenSwan IPSec phase #2 complicationsConnecting to IPSec/L2tp with OpenSwan/xl2tpd from Windows7 to Amazon EC2Cannot connect to Windows Azure virtual network with netgear routerpfSense IPsec VPN setup (Log error: racoon: INFO: unsupported PF_KEY message REGISTER)Cisco IOS Router and Azure VPN - tunnel established, but traffic is not flowingConfigure ipsec vpn tunnel (network to network with IKE with preshared key) on Centos 6 with openswanStrongswan VPN tunnel between two AWS instances won't connectPoor IPsec over GRE performancesSite to Site IPSec between pfSense and Cisco ASA

Is this food a bread or a loaf?

Are cabin dividers used to "hide" the flex of the airplane?

Finding files for which a command fails

What are the advantages and disadvantages of running one shots compared to campaigns?

Is it legal to have the "// (c) 2019 John Smith" header in all files when there are hundreds of contributors?

Is a vector space a subspace of itself?

When blogging recipes, how can I support both readers who want the narrative/journey and ones who want the printer-friendly recipe?

Is there a name of the flying bionic bird?

Can a planet have a different gravitational pull depending on its location in orbit around its sun?

Why is the design of haulage companies so “special”?

Doomsday-clock for my fantasy planet

"My colleague's body is amazing"

Lied on resume at previous job

Landing in very high winds

Calculate Levenshtein distance between two strings in Python

What happens when a metallic dragon and a chromatic dragon mate?

Does it makes sense to buy a new cycle to learn riding?

Pristine Bit Checking

Is there a familial term for apples and pears?

Is ipsum/ipsa/ipse a third person pronoun, or can it serve other functions?

Is "plugging out" electronic devices an American expression?

Could Giant Ground Sloths have been a good pack animal for the ancient Mayans?

If a centaur druid Wild Shapes into a Giant Elk, do their Charge features stack?

How to move the player while also allowing forces to affect it



OpenSwan IPsec tunnel to Azure Gateway is established but unable to connect


StrongSwan - Windows 7 0 IPSec IKEv2 connection problemsOpenSwan IPSec phase #2 complicationsConnecting to IPSec/L2tp with OpenSwan/xl2tpd from Windows7 to Amazon EC2Cannot connect to Windows Azure virtual network with netgear routerpfSense IPsec VPN setup (Log error: racoon: INFO: unsupported PF_KEY message REGISTER)Cisco IOS Router and Azure VPN - tunnel established, but traffic is not flowingConfigure ipsec vpn tunnel (network to network with IKE with preshared key) on Centos 6 with openswanStrongswan VPN tunnel between two AWS instances won't connectPoor IPsec over GRE performancesSite to Site IPSec between pfSense and Cisco ASA






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








2















I am currently trying to set up a IPsec tunnel between my on-premise center and to the VPN in Azure. I am setting up OpenSwan 2.6.23 on an Ubuntu Lucid box, and my box is behind a NAT.



ipsec.conf



config setup
nat_traversal=yes
protostack=netkey
interfaces=%defaultroute
klipsdebug=none
plutodebug=none

conn to-azure
authby=secret
auto=start
type=tunnel

left=10.0.210.22
leftid=<my-public-ip>
leftnexthop=%defaultroute
leftsubnet=10.0.210.0/24

right=<azure-gateway-public-ip>
rightsubnet=10.13.0.0/16
rightnexthop=%defaultroute

ike=aes256-sha1-modp1024
ikev2=insist
phase2=esp
phase2alg=aes256-sha1
pfs=no


ipsec.secrets



<my-public-ip> <azure-gateway-public-ip>: PSK "supersecurepassword"


This is what I receive when I start ipsec, and from what I understand is that it shows the tunnel is established.



000 "to-azure": 10.0.210.0/24===10.0.210.22<10.0.210.22>[<my-public-ip>,+S=C]---10.0.210.3...10.0.210.3---<azure-gateway-public-ip><<azure-gateway-public-ip>>[+S=C]===10.13.0.0/16; erouted; eroute owner: #2
000 "to-azure": myip=unset; hisip=unset;
000 "to-azure": ike_life: 3600s; ipsec_life: 28800s; rekey_margin: 540s; rekey_fuzz: 100%; keyingtries: 0
000 "to-azure": policy: PSK+ENCRYPT+TUNNEL+UP+!IKEv1+IKEv2ALLOW+IKEv2Init+lKOD+rKOD; prio: 24,16; interface: eth0;
000 "to-azure": newest ISAKMP SA: #1; newest IPsec SA: #2;
000 "to-azure": IKE algorithms wanted: AES_CBC(7)_256-SHA1(2)-MODP1024(2); flags=-strict
000 "to-azure": IKE algorithms found: AES_CBC(7)_256-SHA1(2)_160-2,
000 "to-azure": IKE algorithm newest: _256-SHA1-MODP1024
000 "to-azure": ESP algorithms wanted: AES(12)_256-SHA1(2); flags=-strict
000 "to-azure": ESP algorithms loaded: AES(12)_256-SHA1(2)_160
000 "to-azure": ESP algorithm newest: AES_256-HMAC_SHA1; pfsgroup=<N/A>
000
000 #2: "to-azure":500 STATE_PARENT_I3 (PARENT SA established); EVENT_SA_REPLACE in 27760s; newest IPSEC; eroute owner; nodpd; idle; import:admin initiate
000 #1: "to-azure":500 STATE_PARENT_I3 (PARENT SA established); EVENT_SA_REPLACE in 3484s; newest ISAKMP; nodpd; idle; import:admin initiate
000


However, when I check the auth.logs it shows the following:



added connection description "to-azure"
listening for IKE messages
NAT-Traversal: Trying new style NAT-T
NAT-Traversal: ESPINUDP(1) setup failed for new style NAT-T family IPv4 (errno=19)
NAT-Traversal: Trying old style NAT-T
adding interface eth0/eth0 10.0.210.22:500
adding interface eth0/eth0 10.0.210.22:4500
adding interface lo/lo 127.0.0.1:500
adding interface lo/lo 127.0.0.1:4500
adding interface lo/lo ::1:500
loading secrets from "/etc/ipsec.secrets"
"to-azure" #1: initiating v2 parent SA
"to-azure" #1: transition from state STATE_IKEv2_START to state STATE_PARENT_I1
"to-azure" #1: STATE_PARENT_I1: sent v2I1, expected v2R1
"to-azure" #2: transition from state STATE_PARENT_I1 to state STATE_PARENT_I2
"to-azure" #2: STATE_PARENT_I2: sent v2I2, expected v2R2 auth=IKEv2 cipher=aes_256 integ=sha1 prf=oakley_sha group=modp1024
packet from <azure-gateway-public-ip>: IKEv2 mode peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: '<azure-gateway-public-ip>'
"to-azure" #2: transition from state STATE_PARENT_I2 to state STATE_PARENT_I3
"to-azure" #2: negotiated tunnel [10.0.210.0,10.0.210.255] -> [10.13.0.0,10.13.255.255]
"to-azure" #2: STATE_PARENT_I3: PARENT SA established tunnel mode ESP=>0xeebf6740 <0x4d67c332 xfrm=AES_256-HMAC_SHA1 NATOA=none NATD=none DPD=none
| releasing whack for #2 (sock=-1)
| releasing whack for #1 (sock=-1)
packet from <azure-gateway-public-ip>: received packet that was neither (I)nitiator or (R)esponder, msgid=0


ipsec verify shows that everything is OK, with OE disabled. Why am I still unable to receive the packet from my Azure instance?










share|improve this question






















  • Could you ping the private address of your Azure VM from the Linux box?

    – Steven Lee - MSFT
    Apr 28 '17 at 8:50











  • @StevenLee-MSFT No I could not

    – leeeennyy
    May 2 '17 at 5:09











  • Then it seems that the VPN tunnel has not been established correctly. As I have mentioned, please try to check the log from Azure side.

    – Steven Lee - MSFT
    May 2 '17 at 6:50


















2















I am currently trying to set up a IPsec tunnel between my on-premise center and to the VPN in Azure. I am setting up OpenSwan 2.6.23 on an Ubuntu Lucid box, and my box is behind a NAT.



ipsec.conf



config setup
nat_traversal=yes
protostack=netkey
interfaces=%defaultroute
klipsdebug=none
plutodebug=none

conn to-azure
authby=secret
auto=start
type=tunnel

left=10.0.210.22
leftid=<my-public-ip>
leftnexthop=%defaultroute
leftsubnet=10.0.210.0/24

right=<azure-gateway-public-ip>
rightsubnet=10.13.0.0/16
rightnexthop=%defaultroute

ike=aes256-sha1-modp1024
ikev2=insist
phase2=esp
phase2alg=aes256-sha1
pfs=no


ipsec.secrets



<my-public-ip> <azure-gateway-public-ip>: PSK "supersecurepassword"


This is what I receive when I start ipsec, and from what I understand is that it shows the tunnel is established.



000 "to-azure": 10.0.210.0/24===10.0.210.22<10.0.210.22>[<my-public-ip>,+S=C]---10.0.210.3...10.0.210.3---<azure-gateway-public-ip><<azure-gateway-public-ip>>[+S=C]===10.13.0.0/16; erouted; eroute owner: #2
000 "to-azure": myip=unset; hisip=unset;
000 "to-azure": ike_life: 3600s; ipsec_life: 28800s; rekey_margin: 540s; rekey_fuzz: 100%; keyingtries: 0
000 "to-azure": policy: PSK+ENCRYPT+TUNNEL+UP+!IKEv1+IKEv2ALLOW+IKEv2Init+lKOD+rKOD; prio: 24,16; interface: eth0;
000 "to-azure": newest ISAKMP SA: #1; newest IPsec SA: #2;
000 "to-azure": IKE algorithms wanted: AES_CBC(7)_256-SHA1(2)-MODP1024(2); flags=-strict
000 "to-azure": IKE algorithms found: AES_CBC(7)_256-SHA1(2)_160-2,
000 "to-azure": IKE algorithm newest: _256-SHA1-MODP1024
000 "to-azure": ESP algorithms wanted: AES(12)_256-SHA1(2); flags=-strict
000 "to-azure": ESP algorithms loaded: AES(12)_256-SHA1(2)_160
000 "to-azure": ESP algorithm newest: AES_256-HMAC_SHA1; pfsgroup=<N/A>
000
000 #2: "to-azure":500 STATE_PARENT_I3 (PARENT SA established); EVENT_SA_REPLACE in 27760s; newest IPSEC; eroute owner; nodpd; idle; import:admin initiate
000 #1: "to-azure":500 STATE_PARENT_I3 (PARENT SA established); EVENT_SA_REPLACE in 3484s; newest ISAKMP; nodpd; idle; import:admin initiate
000


However, when I check the auth.logs it shows the following:



added connection description "to-azure"
listening for IKE messages
NAT-Traversal: Trying new style NAT-T
NAT-Traversal: ESPINUDP(1) setup failed for new style NAT-T family IPv4 (errno=19)
NAT-Traversal: Trying old style NAT-T
adding interface eth0/eth0 10.0.210.22:500
adding interface eth0/eth0 10.0.210.22:4500
adding interface lo/lo 127.0.0.1:500
adding interface lo/lo 127.0.0.1:4500
adding interface lo/lo ::1:500
loading secrets from "/etc/ipsec.secrets"
"to-azure" #1: initiating v2 parent SA
"to-azure" #1: transition from state STATE_IKEv2_START to state STATE_PARENT_I1
"to-azure" #1: STATE_PARENT_I1: sent v2I1, expected v2R1
"to-azure" #2: transition from state STATE_PARENT_I1 to state STATE_PARENT_I2
"to-azure" #2: STATE_PARENT_I2: sent v2I2, expected v2R2 auth=IKEv2 cipher=aes_256 integ=sha1 prf=oakley_sha group=modp1024
packet from <azure-gateway-public-ip>: IKEv2 mode peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: '<azure-gateway-public-ip>'
"to-azure" #2: transition from state STATE_PARENT_I2 to state STATE_PARENT_I3
"to-azure" #2: negotiated tunnel [10.0.210.0,10.0.210.255] -> [10.13.0.0,10.13.255.255]
"to-azure" #2: STATE_PARENT_I3: PARENT SA established tunnel mode ESP=>0xeebf6740 <0x4d67c332 xfrm=AES_256-HMAC_SHA1 NATOA=none NATD=none DPD=none
| releasing whack for #2 (sock=-1)
| releasing whack for #1 (sock=-1)
packet from <azure-gateway-public-ip>: received packet that was neither (I)nitiator or (R)esponder, msgid=0


ipsec verify shows that everything is OK, with OE disabled. Why am I still unable to receive the packet from my Azure instance?










share|improve this question






















  • Could you ping the private address of your Azure VM from the Linux box?

    – Steven Lee - MSFT
    Apr 28 '17 at 8:50











  • @StevenLee-MSFT No I could not

    – leeeennyy
    May 2 '17 at 5:09











  • Then it seems that the VPN tunnel has not been established correctly. As I have mentioned, please try to check the log from Azure side.

    – Steven Lee - MSFT
    May 2 '17 at 6:50














2












2








2








I am currently trying to set up a IPsec tunnel between my on-premise center and to the VPN in Azure. I am setting up OpenSwan 2.6.23 on an Ubuntu Lucid box, and my box is behind a NAT.



ipsec.conf



config setup
nat_traversal=yes
protostack=netkey
interfaces=%defaultroute
klipsdebug=none
plutodebug=none

conn to-azure
authby=secret
auto=start
type=tunnel

left=10.0.210.22
leftid=<my-public-ip>
leftnexthop=%defaultroute
leftsubnet=10.0.210.0/24

right=<azure-gateway-public-ip>
rightsubnet=10.13.0.0/16
rightnexthop=%defaultroute

ike=aes256-sha1-modp1024
ikev2=insist
phase2=esp
phase2alg=aes256-sha1
pfs=no


ipsec.secrets



<my-public-ip> <azure-gateway-public-ip>: PSK "supersecurepassword"


This is what I receive when I start ipsec, and from what I understand is that it shows the tunnel is established.



000 "to-azure": 10.0.210.0/24===10.0.210.22<10.0.210.22>[<my-public-ip>,+S=C]---10.0.210.3...10.0.210.3---<azure-gateway-public-ip><<azure-gateway-public-ip>>[+S=C]===10.13.0.0/16; erouted; eroute owner: #2
000 "to-azure": myip=unset; hisip=unset;
000 "to-azure": ike_life: 3600s; ipsec_life: 28800s; rekey_margin: 540s; rekey_fuzz: 100%; keyingtries: 0
000 "to-azure": policy: PSK+ENCRYPT+TUNNEL+UP+!IKEv1+IKEv2ALLOW+IKEv2Init+lKOD+rKOD; prio: 24,16; interface: eth0;
000 "to-azure": newest ISAKMP SA: #1; newest IPsec SA: #2;
000 "to-azure": IKE algorithms wanted: AES_CBC(7)_256-SHA1(2)-MODP1024(2); flags=-strict
000 "to-azure": IKE algorithms found: AES_CBC(7)_256-SHA1(2)_160-2,
000 "to-azure": IKE algorithm newest: _256-SHA1-MODP1024
000 "to-azure": ESP algorithms wanted: AES(12)_256-SHA1(2); flags=-strict
000 "to-azure": ESP algorithms loaded: AES(12)_256-SHA1(2)_160
000 "to-azure": ESP algorithm newest: AES_256-HMAC_SHA1; pfsgroup=<N/A>
000
000 #2: "to-azure":500 STATE_PARENT_I3 (PARENT SA established); EVENT_SA_REPLACE in 27760s; newest IPSEC; eroute owner; nodpd; idle; import:admin initiate
000 #1: "to-azure":500 STATE_PARENT_I3 (PARENT SA established); EVENT_SA_REPLACE in 3484s; newest ISAKMP; nodpd; idle; import:admin initiate
000


However, when I check the auth.logs it shows the following:



added connection description "to-azure"
listening for IKE messages
NAT-Traversal: Trying new style NAT-T
NAT-Traversal: ESPINUDP(1) setup failed for new style NAT-T family IPv4 (errno=19)
NAT-Traversal: Trying old style NAT-T
adding interface eth0/eth0 10.0.210.22:500
adding interface eth0/eth0 10.0.210.22:4500
adding interface lo/lo 127.0.0.1:500
adding interface lo/lo 127.0.0.1:4500
adding interface lo/lo ::1:500
loading secrets from "/etc/ipsec.secrets"
"to-azure" #1: initiating v2 parent SA
"to-azure" #1: transition from state STATE_IKEv2_START to state STATE_PARENT_I1
"to-azure" #1: STATE_PARENT_I1: sent v2I1, expected v2R1
"to-azure" #2: transition from state STATE_PARENT_I1 to state STATE_PARENT_I2
"to-azure" #2: STATE_PARENT_I2: sent v2I2, expected v2R2 auth=IKEv2 cipher=aes_256 integ=sha1 prf=oakley_sha group=modp1024
packet from <azure-gateway-public-ip>: IKEv2 mode peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: '<azure-gateway-public-ip>'
"to-azure" #2: transition from state STATE_PARENT_I2 to state STATE_PARENT_I3
"to-azure" #2: negotiated tunnel [10.0.210.0,10.0.210.255] -> [10.13.0.0,10.13.255.255]
"to-azure" #2: STATE_PARENT_I3: PARENT SA established tunnel mode ESP=>0xeebf6740 <0x4d67c332 xfrm=AES_256-HMAC_SHA1 NATOA=none NATD=none DPD=none
| releasing whack for #2 (sock=-1)
| releasing whack for #1 (sock=-1)
packet from <azure-gateway-public-ip>: received packet that was neither (I)nitiator or (R)esponder, msgid=0


ipsec verify shows that everything is OK, with OE disabled. Why am I still unable to receive the packet from my Azure instance?










share|improve this question














I am currently trying to set up a IPsec tunnel between my on-premise center and to the VPN in Azure. I am setting up OpenSwan 2.6.23 on an Ubuntu Lucid box, and my box is behind a NAT.



ipsec.conf



config setup
nat_traversal=yes
protostack=netkey
interfaces=%defaultroute
klipsdebug=none
plutodebug=none

conn to-azure
authby=secret
auto=start
type=tunnel

left=10.0.210.22
leftid=<my-public-ip>
leftnexthop=%defaultroute
leftsubnet=10.0.210.0/24

right=<azure-gateway-public-ip>
rightsubnet=10.13.0.0/16
rightnexthop=%defaultroute

ike=aes256-sha1-modp1024
ikev2=insist
phase2=esp
phase2alg=aes256-sha1
pfs=no


ipsec.secrets



<my-public-ip> <azure-gateway-public-ip>: PSK "supersecurepassword"


This is what I receive when I start ipsec, and from what I understand is that it shows the tunnel is established.



000 "to-azure": 10.0.210.0/24===10.0.210.22<10.0.210.22>[<my-public-ip>,+S=C]---10.0.210.3...10.0.210.3---<azure-gateway-public-ip><<azure-gateway-public-ip>>[+S=C]===10.13.0.0/16; erouted; eroute owner: #2
000 "to-azure": myip=unset; hisip=unset;
000 "to-azure": ike_life: 3600s; ipsec_life: 28800s; rekey_margin: 540s; rekey_fuzz: 100%; keyingtries: 0
000 "to-azure": policy: PSK+ENCRYPT+TUNNEL+UP+!IKEv1+IKEv2ALLOW+IKEv2Init+lKOD+rKOD; prio: 24,16; interface: eth0;
000 "to-azure": newest ISAKMP SA: #1; newest IPsec SA: #2;
000 "to-azure": IKE algorithms wanted: AES_CBC(7)_256-SHA1(2)-MODP1024(2); flags=-strict
000 "to-azure": IKE algorithms found: AES_CBC(7)_256-SHA1(2)_160-2,
000 "to-azure": IKE algorithm newest: _256-SHA1-MODP1024
000 "to-azure": ESP algorithms wanted: AES(12)_256-SHA1(2); flags=-strict
000 "to-azure": ESP algorithms loaded: AES(12)_256-SHA1(2)_160
000 "to-azure": ESP algorithm newest: AES_256-HMAC_SHA1; pfsgroup=<N/A>
000
000 #2: "to-azure":500 STATE_PARENT_I3 (PARENT SA established); EVENT_SA_REPLACE in 27760s; newest IPSEC; eroute owner; nodpd; idle; import:admin initiate
000 #1: "to-azure":500 STATE_PARENT_I3 (PARENT SA established); EVENT_SA_REPLACE in 3484s; newest ISAKMP; nodpd; idle; import:admin initiate
000


However, when I check the auth.logs it shows the following:



added connection description "to-azure"
listening for IKE messages
NAT-Traversal: Trying new style NAT-T
NAT-Traversal: ESPINUDP(1) setup failed for new style NAT-T family IPv4 (errno=19)
NAT-Traversal: Trying old style NAT-T
adding interface eth0/eth0 10.0.210.22:500
adding interface eth0/eth0 10.0.210.22:4500
adding interface lo/lo 127.0.0.1:500
adding interface lo/lo 127.0.0.1:4500
adding interface lo/lo ::1:500
loading secrets from "/etc/ipsec.secrets"
"to-azure" #1: initiating v2 parent SA
"to-azure" #1: transition from state STATE_IKEv2_START to state STATE_PARENT_I1
"to-azure" #1: STATE_PARENT_I1: sent v2I1, expected v2R1
"to-azure" #2: transition from state STATE_PARENT_I1 to state STATE_PARENT_I2
"to-azure" #2: STATE_PARENT_I2: sent v2I2, expected v2R2 auth=IKEv2 cipher=aes_256 integ=sha1 prf=oakley_sha group=modp1024
packet from <azure-gateway-public-ip>: IKEv2 mode peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: '<azure-gateway-public-ip>'
"to-azure" #2: transition from state STATE_PARENT_I2 to state STATE_PARENT_I3
"to-azure" #2: negotiated tunnel [10.0.210.0,10.0.210.255] -> [10.13.0.0,10.13.255.255]
"to-azure" #2: STATE_PARENT_I3: PARENT SA established tunnel mode ESP=>0xeebf6740 <0x4d67c332 xfrm=AES_256-HMAC_SHA1 NATOA=none NATD=none DPD=none
| releasing whack for #2 (sock=-1)
| releasing whack for #1 (sock=-1)
packet from <azure-gateway-public-ip>: received packet that was neither (I)nitiator or (R)esponder, msgid=0


ipsec verify shows that everything is OK, with OE disabled. Why am I still unable to receive the packet from my Azure instance?







linux azure ipsec openswan






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Apr 27 '17 at 4:53









leeeennyyleeeennyy

182




182












  • Could you ping the private address of your Azure VM from the Linux box?

    – Steven Lee - MSFT
    Apr 28 '17 at 8:50











  • @StevenLee-MSFT No I could not

    – leeeennyy
    May 2 '17 at 5:09











  • Then it seems that the VPN tunnel has not been established correctly. As I have mentioned, please try to check the log from Azure side.

    – Steven Lee - MSFT
    May 2 '17 at 6:50


















  • Could you ping the private address of your Azure VM from the Linux box?

    – Steven Lee - MSFT
    Apr 28 '17 at 8:50











  • @StevenLee-MSFT No I could not

    – leeeennyy
    May 2 '17 at 5:09











  • Then it seems that the VPN tunnel has not been established correctly. As I have mentioned, please try to check the log from Azure side.

    – Steven Lee - MSFT
    May 2 '17 at 6:50

















Could you ping the private address of your Azure VM from the Linux box?

– Steven Lee - MSFT
Apr 28 '17 at 8:50





Could you ping the private address of your Azure VM from the Linux box?

– Steven Lee - MSFT
Apr 28 '17 at 8:50













@StevenLee-MSFT No I could not

– leeeennyy
May 2 '17 at 5:09





@StevenLee-MSFT No I could not

– leeeennyy
May 2 '17 at 5:09













Then it seems that the VPN tunnel has not been established correctly. As I have mentioned, please try to check the log from Azure side.

– Steven Lee - MSFT
May 2 '17 at 6:50






Then it seems that the VPN tunnel has not been established correctly. As I have mentioned, please try to check the log from Azure side.

– Steven Lee - MSFT
May 2 '17 at 6:50











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














I tried your IPsec.conf file on my CentOS. It works for me. The version of
libreswan installed on my box is 3.15.



To troubleshoot this issue, please follow the steps below:



Verify if the VPN connection has been established correctly. Please try to get the log from Azure VPN Gateway. Here is a good guide: Step-by-Step: Capturing Azure Resource Manager (ARM) VNET Gateway Diagnostic Logs



If the connection has been established properly, then please make sure that routing function has been enabled on the Linux box and the proper route entries have been advertised to your local network.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "2"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f846809%2fopenswan-ipsec-tunnel-to-azure-gateway-is-established-but-unable-to-connect%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    I tried your IPsec.conf file on my CentOS. It works for me. The version of
    libreswan installed on my box is 3.15.



    To troubleshoot this issue, please follow the steps below:



    Verify if the VPN connection has been established correctly. Please try to get the log from Azure VPN Gateway. Here is a good guide: Step-by-Step: Capturing Azure Resource Manager (ARM) VNET Gateway Diagnostic Logs



    If the connection has been established properly, then please make sure that routing function has been enabled on the Linux box and the proper route entries have been advertised to your local network.






    share|improve this answer



























      0














      I tried your IPsec.conf file on my CentOS. It works for me. The version of
      libreswan installed on my box is 3.15.



      To troubleshoot this issue, please follow the steps below:



      Verify if the VPN connection has been established correctly. Please try to get the log from Azure VPN Gateway. Here is a good guide: Step-by-Step: Capturing Azure Resource Manager (ARM) VNET Gateway Diagnostic Logs



      If the connection has been established properly, then please make sure that routing function has been enabled on the Linux box and the proper route entries have been advertised to your local network.






      share|improve this answer

























        0












        0








        0







        I tried your IPsec.conf file on my CentOS. It works for me. The version of
        libreswan installed on my box is 3.15.



        To troubleshoot this issue, please follow the steps below:



        Verify if the VPN connection has been established correctly. Please try to get the log from Azure VPN Gateway. Here is a good guide: Step-by-Step: Capturing Azure Resource Manager (ARM) VNET Gateway Diagnostic Logs



        If the connection has been established properly, then please make sure that routing function has been enabled on the Linux box and the proper route entries have been advertised to your local network.






        share|improve this answer













        I tried your IPsec.conf file on my CentOS. It works for me. The version of
        libreswan installed on my box is 3.15.



        To troubleshoot this issue, please follow the steps below:



        Verify if the VPN connection has been established correctly. Please try to get the log from Azure VPN Gateway. Here is a good guide: Step-by-Step: Capturing Azure Resource Manager (ARM) VNET Gateway Diagnostic Logs



        If the connection has been established properly, then please make sure that routing function has been enabled on the Linux box and the proper route entries have been advertised to your local network.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Apr 28 '17 at 8:51









        Steven Lee - MSFTSteven Lee - MSFT

        65538




        65538



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f846809%2fopenswan-ipsec-tunnel-to-azure-gateway-is-established-but-unable-to-connect%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Club Baloncesto Breogán Índice Historia | Pavillón | Nome | O Breogán na cultura popular | Xogadores | Adestradores | Presidentes | Palmarés | Historial | Líderes | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióncbbreogan.galCadroGuía oficial da ACB 2009-10, páxina 201Guía oficial ACB 1992, páxina 183. Editorial DB.É de 6.500 espectadores sentados axeitándose á última normativa"Estudiantes Junior, entre as mellores canteiras"o orixinalHemeroteca El Mundo Deportivo, 16 setembro de 1970, páxina 12Historia do BreogánAlfredo Pérez, o último canoneiroHistoria C.B. BreogánHemeroteca de El Mundo DeportivoJimmy Wright, norteamericano do Breogán deixará Lugo por ameazas de morteResultados de Breogán en 1986-87Resultados de Breogán en 1990-91Ficha de Velimir Perasović en acb.comResultados de Breogán en 1994-95Breogán arrasa al Barça. "El Mundo Deportivo", 27 de setembro de 1999, páxina 58CB Breogán - FC BarcelonaA FEB invita a participar nunha nova Liga EuropeaCharlie Bell na prensa estatalMáximos anotadores 2005Tempada 2005-06 : Tódolos Xogadores da Xornada""Non quero pensar nunha man negra, mais pregúntome que está a pasar""o orixinalRaúl López, orgulloso dos xogadores, presume da boa saúde económica do BreogánJulio González confirma que cesa como presidente del BreogánHomenaxe a Lisardo GómezA tempada do rexurdimento celesteEntrevista a Lisardo GómezEl COB dinamita el Pazo para forzar el quinto (69-73)Cafés Candelas, patrocinador del CB Breogán"Suso Lázare, novo presidente do Breogán"o orixinalCafés Candelas Breogán firma el mayor triunfo de la historiaEl Breogán realizará 17 homenajes por su cincuenta aniversario"O Breogán honra ao seu fundador e primeiro presidente"o orixinalMiguel Giao recibiu a homenaxe do PazoHomenaxe aos primeiros gladiadores celestesO home que nos amosa como ver o Breo co corazónTita Franco será homenaxeada polos #50anosdeBreoJulio Vila recibirá unha homenaxe in memoriam polos #50anosdeBreo"O Breogán homenaxeará aos seus aboados máis veteráns"Pechada ovación a «Capi» Sanmartín e Ricardo «Corazón de González»Homenaxe por décadas de informaciónPaco García volve ao Pazo con motivo do 50 aniversario"Resultados y clasificaciones""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, campión da Copa Princesa""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, equipo ACB"C.B. Breogán"Proxecto social"o orixinal"Centros asociados"o orixinalFicha en imdb.comMario Camus trata la recuperación del amor en 'La vieja música', su última película"Páxina web oficial""Club Baloncesto Breogán""C. B. Breogán S.A.D."eehttp://www.fegaba.com

            Vilaño, A Laracha Índice Patrimonio | Lugares e parroquias | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación43°14′52″N 8°36′03″O / 43.24775, -8.60070

            Cegueira Índice Epidemioloxía | Deficiencia visual | Tipos de cegueira | Principais causas de cegueira | Tratamento | Técnicas de adaptación e axudas | Vida dos cegos | Primeiros auxilios | Crenzas respecto das persoas cegas | Crenzas das persoas cegas | O neno deficiente visual | Aspectos psicolóxicos da cegueira | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación54.054.154.436928256blindnessDicionario da Real Academia GalegaPortal das Palabras"International Standards: Visual Standards — Aspects and Ranges of Vision Loss with Emphasis on Population Surveys.""Visual impairment and blindness""Presentan un plan para previr a cegueira"o orixinalACCDV Associació Catalana de Cecs i Disminuïts Visuals - PMFTrachoma"Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis"1844137110.1056/NEJMoa0802268Cans guía - os mellores amigos dos cegosArquivadoEscola de cans guía para cegos en Mortágua, PortugalArquivado"Tecnología para ciegos y deficientes visuales. Recopilación de recursos gratuitos en la Red""Colorino""‘COL.diesis’, escuchar los sonidos del color""COL.diesis: Transforming Colour into Melody and Implementing the Result in a Colour Sensor Device"o orixinal"Sistema de desarrollo de sinestesia color-sonido para invidentes utilizando un protocolo de audio""Enseñanza táctil - geometría y color. Juegos didácticos para niños ciegos y videntes""Sistema Constanz"L'ocupació laboral dels cecs a l'Estat espanyol està pràcticament equiparada a la de les persones amb visió, entrevista amb Pedro ZuritaONCE (Organización Nacional de Cegos de España)Prevención da cegueiraDescrición de deficiencias visuais (Disc@pnet)Braillín, un boneco atractivo para calquera neno, con ou sen discapacidade, que permite familiarizarse co sistema de escritura e lectura brailleAxudas Técnicas36838ID00897494007150-90057129528256DOID:1432HP:0000618D001766C10.597.751.941.162C97109C0155020