OpenSwan IPsec tunnel to Azure Gateway is established but unable to connectStrongSwan - Windows 7 0 IPSec IKEv2 connection problemsOpenSwan IPSec phase #2 complicationsConnecting to IPSec/L2tp with OpenSwan/xl2tpd from Windows7 to Amazon EC2Cannot connect to Windows Azure virtual network with netgear routerpfSense IPsec VPN setup (Log error: racoon: INFO: unsupported PF_KEY message REGISTER)Cisco IOS Router and Azure VPN - tunnel established, but traffic is not flowingConfigure ipsec vpn tunnel (network to network with IKE with preshared key) on Centos 6 with openswanStrongswan VPN tunnel between two AWS instances won't connectPoor IPsec over GRE performancesSite to Site IPSec between pfSense and Cisco ASA
Is this food a bread or a loaf?
Are cabin dividers used to "hide" the flex of the airplane?
Finding files for which a command fails
What are the advantages and disadvantages of running one shots compared to campaigns?
Is it legal to have the "// (c) 2019 John Smith" header in all files when there are hundreds of contributors?
Is a vector space a subspace of itself?
When blogging recipes, how can I support both readers who want the narrative/journey and ones who want the printer-friendly recipe?
Is there a name of the flying bionic bird?
Can a planet have a different gravitational pull depending on its location in orbit around its sun?
Why is the design of haulage companies so “special”?
Doomsday-clock for my fantasy planet
"My colleague's body is amazing"
Lied on resume at previous job
Landing in very high winds
Calculate Levenshtein distance between two strings in Python
What happens when a metallic dragon and a chromatic dragon mate?
Does it makes sense to buy a new cycle to learn riding?
Pristine Bit Checking
Is there a familial term for apples and pears?
Is ipsum/ipsa/ipse a third person pronoun, or can it serve other functions?
Is "plugging out" electronic devices an American expression?
Could Giant Ground Sloths have been a good pack animal for the ancient Mayans?
If a centaur druid Wild Shapes into a Giant Elk, do their Charge features stack?
How to move the player while also allowing forces to affect it
OpenSwan IPsec tunnel to Azure Gateway is established but unable to connect
StrongSwan - Windows 7 0 IPSec IKEv2 connection problemsOpenSwan IPSec phase #2 complicationsConnecting to IPSec/L2tp with OpenSwan/xl2tpd from Windows7 to Amazon EC2Cannot connect to Windows Azure virtual network with netgear routerpfSense IPsec VPN setup (Log error: racoon: INFO: unsupported PF_KEY message REGISTER)Cisco IOS Router and Azure VPN - tunnel established, but traffic is not flowingConfigure ipsec vpn tunnel (network to network with IKE with preshared key) on Centos 6 with openswanStrongswan VPN tunnel between two AWS instances won't connectPoor IPsec over GRE performancesSite to Site IPSec between pfSense and Cisco ASA
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
I am currently trying to set up a IPsec tunnel between my on-premise center and to the VPN in Azure. I am setting up OpenSwan 2.6.23 on an Ubuntu Lucid box, and my box is behind a NAT.
ipsec.conf
config setup
nat_traversal=yes
protostack=netkey
interfaces=%defaultroute
klipsdebug=none
plutodebug=none
conn to-azure
authby=secret
auto=start
type=tunnel
left=10.0.210.22
leftid=<my-public-ip>
leftnexthop=%defaultroute
leftsubnet=10.0.210.0/24
right=<azure-gateway-public-ip>
rightsubnet=10.13.0.0/16
rightnexthop=%defaultroute
ike=aes256-sha1-modp1024
ikev2=insist
phase2=esp
phase2alg=aes256-sha1
pfs=no
ipsec.secrets
<my-public-ip> <azure-gateway-public-ip>: PSK "supersecurepassword"
This is what I receive when I start ipsec, and from what I understand is that it shows the tunnel is established.
000 "to-azure": 10.0.210.0/24===10.0.210.22<10.0.210.22>[<my-public-ip>,+S=C]---10.0.210.3...10.0.210.3---<azure-gateway-public-ip><<azure-gateway-public-ip>>[+S=C]===10.13.0.0/16; erouted; eroute owner: #2
000 "to-azure": myip=unset; hisip=unset;
000 "to-azure": ike_life: 3600s; ipsec_life: 28800s; rekey_margin: 540s; rekey_fuzz: 100%; keyingtries: 0
000 "to-azure": policy: PSK+ENCRYPT+TUNNEL+UP+!IKEv1+IKEv2ALLOW+IKEv2Init+lKOD+rKOD; prio: 24,16; interface: eth0;
000 "to-azure": newest ISAKMP SA: #1; newest IPsec SA: #2;
000 "to-azure": IKE algorithms wanted: AES_CBC(7)_256-SHA1(2)-MODP1024(2); flags=-strict
000 "to-azure": IKE algorithms found: AES_CBC(7)_256-SHA1(2)_160-2,
000 "to-azure": IKE algorithm newest: _256-SHA1-MODP1024
000 "to-azure": ESP algorithms wanted: AES(12)_256-SHA1(2); flags=-strict
000 "to-azure": ESP algorithms loaded: AES(12)_256-SHA1(2)_160
000 "to-azure": ESP algorithm newest: AES_256-HMAC_SHA1; pfsgroup=<N/A>
000
000 #2: "to-azure":500 STATE_PARENT_I3 (PARENT SA established); EVENT_SA_REPLACE in 27760s; newest IPSEC; eroute owner; nodpd; idle; import:admin initiate
000 #1: "to-azure":500 STATE_PARENT_I3 (PARENT SA established); EVENT_SA_REPLACE in 3484s; newest ISAKMP; nodpd; idle; import:admin initiate
000
However, when I check the auth.logs it shows the following:
added connection description "to-azure"
listening for IKE messages
NAT-Traversal: Trying new style NAT-T
NAT-Traversal: ESPINUDP(1) setup failed for new style NAT-T family IPv4 (errno=19)
NAT-Traversal: Trying old style NAT-T
adding interface eth0/eth0 10.0.210.22:500
adding interface eth0/eth0 10.0.210.22:4500
adding interface lo/lo 127.0.0.1:500
adding interface lo/lo 127.0.0.1:4500
adding interface lo/lo ::1:500
loading secrets from "/etc/ipsec.secrets"
"to-azure" #1: initiating v2 parent SA
"to-azure" #1: transition from state STATE_IKEv2_START to state STATE_PARENT_I1
"to-azure" #1: STATE_PARENT_I1: sent v2I1, expected v2R1
"to-azure" #2: transition from state STATE_PARENT_I1 to state STATE_PARENT_I2
"to-azure" #2: STATE_PARENT_I2: sent v2I2, expected v2R2 auth=IKEv2 cipher=aes_256 integ=sha1 prf=oakley_sha group=modp1024
packet from <azure-gateway-public-ip>: IKEv2 mode peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: '<azure-gateway-public-ip>'
"to-azure" #2: transition from state STATE_PARENT_I2 to state STATE_PARENT_I3
"to-azure" #2: negotiated tunnel [10.0.210.0,10.0.210.255] -> [10.13.0.0,10.13.255.255]
"to-azure" #2: STATE_PARENT_I3: PARENT SA established tunnel mode ESP=>0xeebf6740 <0x4d67c332 xfrm=AES_256-HMAC_SHA1 NATOA=none NATD=none DPD=none
| releasing whack for #2 (sock=-1)
| releasing whack for #1 (sock=-1)
packet from <azure-gateway-public-ip>: received packet that was neither (I)nitiator or (R)esponder, msgid=0
ipsec verify shows that everything is OK, with OE disabled. Why am I still unable to receive the packet from my Azure instance?
linux azure ipsec openswan
add a comment |
I am currently trying to set up a IPsec tunnel between my on-premise center and to the VPN in Azure. I am setting up OpenSwan 2.6.23 on an Ubuntu Lucid box, and my box is behind a NAT.
ipsec.conf
config setup
nat_traversal=yes
protostack=netkey
interfaces=%defaultroute
klipsdebug=none
plutodebug=none
conn to-azure
authby=secret
auto=start
type=tunnel
left=10.0.210.22
leftid=<my-public-ip>
leftnexthop=%defaultroute
leftsubnet=10.0.210.0/24
right=<azure-gateway-public-ip>
rightsubnet=10.13.0.0/16
rightnexthop=%defaultroute
ike=aes256-sha1-modp1024
ikev2=insist
phase2=esp
phase2alg=aes256-sha1
pfs=no
ipsec.secrets
<my-public-ip> <azure-gateway-public-ip>: PSK "supersecurepassword"
This is what I receive when I start ipsec, and from what I understand is that it shows the tunnel is established.
000 "to-azure": 10.0.210.0/24===10.0.210.22<10.0.210.22>[<my-public-ip>,+S=C]---10.0.210.3...10.0.210.3---<azure-gateway-public-ip><<azure-gateway-public-ip>>[+S=C]===10.13.0.0/16; erouted; eroute owner: #2
000 "to-azure": myip=unset; hisip=unset;
000 "to-azure": ike_life: 3600s; ipsec_life: 28800s; rekey_margin: 540s; rekey_fuzz: 100%; keyingtries: 0
000 "to-azure": policy: PSK+ENCRYPT+TUNNEL+UP+!IKEv1+IKEv2ALLOW+IKEv2Init+lKOD+rKOD; prio: 24,16; interface: eth0;
000 "to-azure": newest ISAKMP SA: #1; newest IPsec SA: #2;
000 "to-azure": IKE algorithms wanted: AES_CBC(7)_256-SHA1(2)-MODP1024(2); flags=-strict
000 "to-azure": IKE algorithms found: AES_CBC(7)_256-SHA1(2)_160-2,
000 "to-azure": IKE algorithm newest: _256-SHA1-MODP1024
000 "to-azure": ESP algorithms wanted: AES(12)_256-SHA1(2); flags=-strict
000 "to-azure": ESP algorithms loaded: AES(12)_256-SHA1(2)_160
000 "to-azure": ESP algorithm newest: AES_256-HMAC_SHA1; pfsgroup=<N/A>
000
000 #2: "to-azure":500 STATE_PARENT_I3 (PARENT SA established); EVENT_SA_REPLACE in 27760s; newest IPSEC; eroute owner; nodpd; idle; import:admin initiate
000 #1: "to-azure":500 STATE_PARENT_I3 (PARENT SA established); EVENT_SA_REPLACE in 3484s; newest ISAKMP; nodpd; idle; import:admin initiate
000
However, when I check the auth.logs it shows the following:
added connection description "to-azure"
listening for IKE messages
NAT-Traversal: Trying new style NAT-T
NAT-Traversal: ESPINUDP(1) setup failed for new style NAT-T family IPv4 (errno=19)
NAT-Traversal: Trying old style NAT-T
adding interface eth0/eth0 10.0.210.22:500
adding interface eth0/eth0 10.0.210.22:4500
adding interface lo/lo 127.0.0.1:500
adding interface lo/lo 127.0.0.1:4500
adding interface lo/lo ::1:500
loading secrets from "/etc/ipsec.secrets"
"to-azure" #1: initiating v2 parent SA
"to-azure" #1: transition from state STATE_IKEv2_START to state STATE_PARENT_I1
"to-azure" #1: STATE_PARENT_I1: sent v2I1, expected v2R1
"to-azure" #2: transition from state STATE_PARENT_I1 to state STATE_PARENT_I2
"to-azure" #2: STATE_PARENT_I2: sent v2I2, expected v2R2 auth=IKEv2 cipher=aes_256 integ=sha1 prf=oakley_sha group=modp1024
packet from <azure-gateway-public-ip>: IKEv2 mode peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: '<azure-gateway-public-ip>'
"to-azure" #2: transition from state STATE_PARENT_I2 to state STATE_PARENT_I3
"to-azure" #2: negotiated tunnel [10.0.210.0,10.0.210.255] -> [10.13.0.0,10.13.255.255]
"to-azure" #2: STATE_PARENT_I3: PARENT SA established tunnel mode ESP=>0xeebf6740 <0x4d67c332 xfrm=AES_256-HMAC_SHA1 NATOA=none NATD=none DPD=none
| releasing whack for #2 (sock=-1)
| releasing whack for #1 (sock=-1)
packet from <azure-gateway-public-ip>: received packet that was neither (I)nitiator or (R)esponder, msgid=0
ipsec verify shows that everything is OK, with OE disabled. Why am I still unable to receive the packet from my Azure instance?
linux azure ipsec openswan
Could you ping the private address of your Azure VM from the Linux box?
– Steven Lee - MSFT
Apr 28 '17 at 8:50
@StevenLee-MSFT No I could not
– leeeennyy
May 2 '17 at 5:09
Then it seems that the VPN tunnel has not been established correctly. As I have mentioned, please try to check the log from Azure side.
– Steven Lee - MSFT
May 2 '17 at 6:50
add a comment |
I am currently trying to set up a IPsec tunnel between my on-premise center and to the VPN in Azure. I am setting up OpenSwan 2.6.23 on an Ubuntu Lucid box, and my box is behind a NAT.
ipsec.conf
config setup
nat_traversal=yes
protostack=netkey
interfaces=%defaultroute
klipsdebug=none
plutodebug=none
conn to-azure
authby=secret
auto=start
type=tunnel
left=10.0.210.22
leftid=<my-public-ip>
leftnexthop=%defaultroute
leftsubnet=10.0.210.0/24
right=<azure-gateway-public-ip>
rightsubnet=10.13.0.0/16
rightnexthop=%defaultroute
ike=aes256-sha1-modp1024
ikev2=insist
phase2=esp
phase2alg=aes256-sha1
pfs=no
ipsec.secrets
<my-public-ip> <azure-gateway-public-ip>: PSK "supersecurepassword"
This is what I receive when I start ipsec, and from what I understand is that it shows the tunnel is established.
000 "to-azure": 10.0.210.0/24===10.0.210.22<10.0.210.22>[<my-public-ip>,+S=C]---10.0.210.3...10.0.210.3---<azure-gateway-public-ip><<azure-gateway-public-ip>>[+S=C]===10.13.0.0/16; erouted; eroute owner: #2
000 "to-azure": myip=unset; hisip=unset;
000 "to-azure": ike_life: 3600s; ipsec_life: 28800s; rekey_margin: 540s; rekey_fuzz: 100%; keyingtries: 0
000 "to-azure": policy: PSK+ENCRYPT+TUNNEL+UP+!IKEv1+IKEv2ALLOW+IKEv2Init+lKOD+rKOD; prio: 24,16; interface: eth0;
000 "to-azure": newest ISAKMP SA: #1; newest IPsec SA: #2;
000 "to-azure": IKE algorithms wanted: AES_CBC(7)_256-SHA1(2)-MODP1024(2); flags=-strict
000 "to-azure": IKE algorithms found: AES_CBC(7)_256-SHA1(2)_160-2,
000 "to-azure": IKE algorithm newest: _256-SHA1-MODP1024
000 "to-azure": ESP algorithms wanted: AES(12)_256-SHA1(2); flags=-strict
000 "to-azure": ESP algorithms loaded: AES(12)_256-SHA1(2)_160
000 "to-azure": ESP algorithm newest: AES_256-HMAC_SHA1; pfsgroup=<N/A>
000
000 #2: "to-azure":500 STATE_PARENT_I3 (PARENT SA established); EVENT_SA_REPLACE in 27760s; newest IPSEC; eroute owner; nodpd; idle; import:admin initiate
000 #1: "to-azure":500 STATE_PARENT_I3 (PARENT SA established); EVENT_SA_REPLACE in 3484s; newest ISAKMP; nodpd; idle; import:admin initiate
000
However, when I check the auth.logs it shows the following:
added connection description "to-azure"
listening for IKE messages
NAT-Traversal: Trying new style NAT-T
NAT-Traversal: ESPINUDP(1) setup failed for new style NAT-T family IPv4 (errno=19)
NAT-Traversal: Trying old style NAT-T
adding interface eth0/eth0 10.0.210.22:500
adding interface eth0/eth0 10.0.210.22:4500
adding interface lo/lo 127.0.0.1:500
adding interface lo/lo 127.0.0.1:4500
adding interface lo/lo ::1:500
loading secrets from "/etc/ipsec.secrets"
"to-azure" #1: initiating v2 parent SA
"to-azure" #1: transition from state STATE_IKEv2_START to state STATE_PARENT_I1
"to-azure" #1: STATE_PARENT_I1: sent v2I1, expected v2R1
"to-azure" #2: transition from state STATE_PARENT_I1 to state STATE_PARENT_I2
"to-azure" #2: STATE_PARENT_I2: sent v2I2, expected v2R2 auth=IKEv2 cipher=aes_256 integ=sha1 prf=oakley_sha group=modp1024
packet from <azure-gateway-public-ip>: IKEv2 mode peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: '<azure-gateway-public-ip>'
"to-azure" #2: transition from state STATE_PARENT_I2 to state STATE_PARENT_I3
"to-azure" #2: negotiated tunnel [10.0.210.0,10.0.210.255] -> [10.13.0.0,10.13.255.255]
"to-azure" #2: STATE_PARENT_I3: PARENT SA established tunnel mode ESP=>0xeebf6740 <0x4d67c332 xfrm=AES_256-HMAC_SHA1 NATOA=none NATD=none DPD=none
| releasing whack for #2 (sock=-1)
| releasing whack for #1 (sock=-1)
packet from <azure-gateway-public-ip>: received packet that was neither (I)nitiator or (R)esponder, msgid=0
ipsec verify shows that everything is OK, with OE disabled. Why am I still unable to receive the packet from my Azure instance?
linux azure ipsec openswan
I am currently trying to set up a IPsec tunnel between my on-premise center and to the VPN in Azure. I am setting up OpenSwan 2.6.23 on an Ubuntu Lucid box, and my box is behind a NAT.
ipsec.conf
config setup
nat_traversal=yes
protostack=netkey
interfaces=%defaultroute
klipsdebug=none
plutodebug=none
conn to-azure
authby=secret
auto=start
type=tunnel
left=10.0.210.22
leftid=<my-public-ip>
leftnexthop=%defaultroute
leftsubnet=10.0.210.0/24
right=<azure-gateway-public-ip>
rightsubnet=10.13.0.0/16
rightnexthop=%defaultroute
ike=aes256-sha1-modp1024
ikev2=insist
phase2=esp
phase2alg=aes256-sha1
pfs=no
ipsec.secrets
<my-public-ip> <azure-gateway-public-ip>: PSK "supersecurepassword"
This is what I receive when I start ipsec, and from what I understand is that it shows the tunnel is established.
000 "to-azure": 10.0.210.0/24===10.0.210.22<10.0.210.22>[<my-public-ip>,+S=C]---10.0.210.3...10.0.210.3---<azure-gateway-public-ip><<azure-gateway-public-ip>>[+S=C]===10.13.0.0/16; erouted; eroute owner: #2
000 "to-azure": myip=unset; hisip=unset;
000 "to-azure": ike_life: 3600s; ipsec_life: 28800s; rekey_margin: 540s; rekey_fuzz: 100%; keyingtries: 0
000 "to-azure": policy: PSK+ENCRYPT+TUNNEL+UP+!IKEv1+IKEv2ALLOW+IKEv2Init+lKOD+rKOD; prio: 24,16; interface: eth0;
000 "to-azure": newest ISAKMP SA: #1; newest IPsec SA: #2;
000 "to-azure": IKE algorithms wanted: AES_CBC(7)_256-SHA1(2)-MODP1024(2); flags=-strict
000 "to-azure": IKE algorithms found: AES_CBC(7)_256-SHA1(2)_160-2,
000 "to-azure": IKE algorithm newest: _256-SHA1-MODP1024
000 "to-azure": ESP algorithms wanted: AES(12)_256-SHA1(2); flags=-strict
000 "to-azure": ESP algorithms loaded: AES(12)_256-SHA1(2)_160
000 "to-azure": ESP algorithm newest: AES_256-HMAC_SHA1; pfsgroup=<N/A>
000
000 #2: "to-azure":500 STATE_PARENT_I3 (PARENT SA established); EVENT_SA_REPLACE in 27760s; newest IPSEC; eroute owner; nodpd; idle; import:admin initiate
000 #1: "to-azure":500 STATE_PARENT_I3 (PARENT SA established); EVENT_SA_REPLACE in 3484s; newest ISAKMP; nodpd; idle; import:admin initiate
000
However, when I check the auth.logs it shows the following:
added connection description "to-azure"
listening for IKE messages
NAT-Traversal: Trying new style NAT-T
NAT-Traversal: ESPINUDP(1) setup failed for new style NAT-T family IPv4 (errno=19)
NAT-Traversal: Trying old style NAT-T
adding interface eth0/eth0 10.0.210.22:500
adding interface eth0/eth0 10.0.210.22:4500
adding interface lo/lo 127.0.0.1:500
adding interface lo/lo 127.0.0.1:4500
adding interface lo/lo ::1:500
loading secrets from "/etc/ipsec.secrets"
"to-azure" #1: initiating v2 parent SA
"to-azure" #1: transition from state STATE_IKEv2_START to state STATE_PARENT_I1
"to-azure" #1: STATE_PARENT_I1: sent v2I1, expected v2R1
"to-azure" #2: transition from state STATE_PARENT_I1 to state STATE_PARENT_I2
"to-azure" #2: STATE_PARENT_I2: sent v2I2, expected v2R2 auth=IKEv2 cipher=aes_256 integ=sha1 prf=oakley_sha group=modp1024
packet from <azure-gateway-public-ip>: IKEv2 mode peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: '<azure-gateway-public-ip>'
"to-azure" #2: transition from state STATE_PARENT_I2 to state STATE_PARENT_I3
"to-azure" #2: negotiated tunnel [10.0.210.0,10.0.210.255] -> [10.13.0.0,10.13.255.255]
"to-azure" #2: STATE_PARENT_I3: PARENT SA established tunnel mode ESP=>0xeebf6740 <0x4d67c332 xfrm=AES_256-HMAC_SHA1 NATOA=none NATD=none DPD=none
| releasing whack for #2 (sock=-1)
| releasing whack for #1 (sock=-1)
packet from <azure-gateway-public-ip>: received packet that was neither (I)nitiator or (R)esponder, msgid=0
ipsec verify shows that everything is OK, with OE disabled. Why am I still unable to receive the packet from my Azure instance?
linux azure ipsec openswan
linux azure ipsec openswan
asked Apr 27 '17 at 4:53
leeeennyyleeeennyy
182
182
Could you ping the private address of your Azure VM from the Linux box?
– Steven Lee - MSFT
Apr 28 '17 at 8:50
@StevenLee-MSFT No I could not
– leeeennyy
May 2 '17 at 5:09
Then it seems that the VPN tunnel has not been established correctly. As I have mentioned, please try to check the log from Azure side.
– Steven Lee - MSFT
May 2 '17 at 6:50
add a comment |
Could you ping the private address of your Azure VM from the Linux box?
– Steven Lee - MSFT
Apr 28 '17 at 8:50
@StevenLee-MSFT No I could not
– leeeennyy
May 2 '17 at 5:09
Then it seems that the VPN tunnel has not been established correctly. As I have mentioned, please try to check the log from Azure side.
– Steven Lee - MSFT
May 2 '17 at 6:50
Could you ping the private address of your Azure VM from the Linux box?
– Steven Lee - MSFT
Apr 28 '17 at 8:50
Could you ping the private address of your Azure VM from the Linux box?
– Steven Lee - MSFT
Apr 28 '17 at 8:50
@StevenLee-MSFT No I could not
– leeeennyy
May 2 '17 at 5:09
@StevenLee-MSFT No I could not
– leeeennyy
May 2 '17 at 5:09
Then it seems that the VPN tunnel has not been established correctly. As I have mentioned, please try to check the log from Azure side.
– Steven Lee - MSFT
May 2 '17 at 6:50
Then it seems that the VPN tunnel has not been established correctly. As I have mentioned, please try to check the log from Azure side.
– Steven Lee - MSFT
May 2 '17 at 6:50
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
I tried your IPsec.conf file on my CentOS. It works for me. The version of
libreswan installed on my box is 3.15.
To troubleshoot this issue, please follow the steps below:
Verify if the VPN connection has been established correctly. Please try to get the log from Azure VPN Gateway. Here is a good guide: Step-by-Step: Capturing Azure Resource Manager (ARM) VNET Gateway Diagnostic Logs
If the connection has been established properly, then please make sure that routing function has been enabled on the Linux box and the proper route entries have been advertised to your local network.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "2"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f846809%2fopenswan-ipsec-tunnel-to-azure-gateway-is-established-but-unable-to-connect%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I tried your IPsec.conf file on my CentOS. It works for me. The version of
libreswan installed on my box is 3.15.
To troubleshoot this issue, please follow the steps below:
Verify if the VPN connection has been established correctly. Please try to get the log from Azure VPN Gateway. Here is a good guide: Step-by-Step: Capturing Azure Resource Manager (ARM) VNET Gateway Diagnostic Logs
If the connection has been established properly, then please make sure that routing function has been enabled on the Linux box and the proper route entries have been advertised to your local network.
add a comment |
I tried your IPsec.conf file on my CentOS. It works for me. The version of
libreswan installed on my box is 3.15.
To troubleshoot this issue, please follow the steps below:
Verify if the VPN connection has been established correctly. Please try to get the log from Azure VPN Gateway. Here is a good guide: Step-by-Step: Capturing Azure Resource Manager (ARM) VNET Gateway Diagnostic Logs
If the connection has been established properly, then please make sure that routing function has been enabled on the Linux box and the proper route entries have been advertised to your local network.
add a comment |
I tried your IPsec.conf file on my CentOS. It works for me. The version of
libreswan installed on my box is 3.15.
To troubleshoot this issue, please follow the steps below:
Verify if the VPN connection has been established correctly. Please try to get the log from Azure VPN Gateway. Here is a good guide: Step-by-Step: Capturing Azure Resource Manager (ARM) VNET Gateway Diagnostic Logs
If the connection has been established properly, then please make sure that routing function has been enabled on the Linux box and the proper route entries have been advertised to your local network.
I tried your IPsec.conf file on my CentOS. It works for me. The version of
libreswan installed on my box is 3.15.
To troubleshoot this issue, please follow the steps below:
Verify if the VPN connection has been established correctly. Please try to get the log from Azure VPN Gateway. Here is a good guide: Step-by-Step: Capturing Azure Resource Manager (ARM) VNET Gateway Diagnostic Logs
If the connection has been established properly, then please make sure that routing function has been enabled on the Linux box and the proper route entries have been advertised to your local network.
answered Apr 28 '17 at 8:51
Steven Lee - MSFTSteven Lee - MSFT
65538
65538
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f846809%2fopenswan-ipsec-tunnel-to-azure-gateway-is-established-but-unable-to-connect%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Could you ping the private address of your Azure VM from the Linux box?
– Steven Lee - MSFT
Apr 28 '17 at 8:50
@StevenLee-MSFT No I could not
– leeeennyy
May 2 '17 at 5:09
Then it seems that the VPN tunnel has not been established correctly. As I have mentioned, please try to check the log from Azure side.
– Steven Lee - MSFT
May 2 '17 at 6:50