“Counterexample” for the Inverse function theoremApplication of the Inverse Function TheoremQuestion regarding the Kolmogorov-Riesz theorem on relatively compact subsets of $L^p(Omega)$.Looking for a special kind of injective functionInverse Function Theorem and InjectivityFind all $(x,y,z) in mathbbR^3$ where $f(x,y,z)=(xy,xz,yz)$ is locally invertibleInverse Function Theorem and global inversesInverse function theorem local injectivity proofFunction satisfying $(Df(x)h,h) geq alpha(h,h), forall x,h in mathbbR^n$ has an inverse around every point?Jordan Regions and the Inverse Function TheoremHow is this not a proof of the Jacobian conjecture in the complex case?
Why would Lupin kill Pettigrew?
What are the problems in teaching guitar via Skype?
Can a rogue effectively triple their speed by combining Dash and Ready?
Why were the Night's Watch required to be celibate?
How did early x86 BIOS programmers manage to program full blown TUIs given very few bytes of ROM/EPROM?
Is there an evolutionary advantage to having two heads?
Can a helicopter mask itself from Radar?
How should I push back against my job assigning "homework"?
If a massive object like Jupiter flew past the Earth how close would it need to come to pull people off of the surface?
How can I grammatically understand "Wir über uns"?
Uncommanded roll at high speed
Do creatures all have the same statistics upon being reanimated via the Animate Dead spell?
Draw a checker pattern with a black X in the center
Term for checking piece whose opponent daren't capture it
Team member doesn't give me the minimum time to complete a talk
How to detach yourself from a character you're going to kill?
Thousands and thousands of words
Is there a rule that prohibits us from using 2 possessives in a row?
Expenditure in Poland - Forex doesn't have Zloty
Can an old DSLR be upgraded to match modern smartphone image quality
My player wants to cast multiple charges of magic missile from a wand
Future enhancements for the finite element method
How was Apollo supposed to rendezvous in the case of a lunar abort?
Can't connect to Internet in bash using Mac OS
“Counterexample” for the Inverse function theorem
Application of the Inverse Function TheoremQuestion regarding the Kolmogorov-Riesz theorem on relatively compact subsets of $L^p(Omega)$.Looking for a special kind of injective functionInverse Function Theorem and InjectivityFind all $(x,y,z) in mathbbR^3$ where $f(x,y,z)=(xy,xz,yz)$ is locally invertibleInverse Function Theorem and global inversesInverse function theorem local injectivity proofFunction satisfying $(Df(x)h,h) geq alpha(h,h), forall x,h in mathbbR^n$ has an inverse around every point?Jordan Regions and the Inverse Function TheoremHow is this not a proof of the Jacobian conjecture in the complex case?
$begingroup$
In my class we stated the theorem as follows:
Let $OmegasubseteqmathbbR^n$ be an open set and $f:OmegatomathbbR^n$ a $mathscrC^1(Omega)$ function. If $|J_f(a)|ne0$ for some $ainOmega$ then there exists $delta>0$ such that $g:=fvert_B(a,delta)$ is injective and ...
This only is a sufficient condition, so is there any function whose jacobian has determinant $0$ at every point but still is injective? If the determinant only vanished on one single point something similar to $f(x)=x^3$ at $x=0$ in $mathbbR$ would do the trick, but if $|f'(x)|=0$ for every $xinOmegasubseteqmathbbR$ then $f$ is constant and not injective. Does the same hold in $mathbbR^n$?
Thanks
real-analysis examples-counterexamples inverse-function-theorem
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In my class we stated the theorem as follows:
Let $OmegasubseteqmathbbR^n$ be an open set and $f:OmegatomathbbR^n$ a $mathscrC^1(Omega)$ function. If $|J_f(a)|ne0$ for some $ainOmega$ then there exists $delta>0$ such that $g:=fvert_B(a,delta)$ is injective and ...
This only is a sufficient condition, so is there any function whose jacobian has determinant $0$ at every point but still is injective? If the determinant only vanished on one single point something similar to $f(x)=x^3$ at $x=0$ in $mathbbR$ would do the trick, but if $|f'(x)|=0$ for every $xinOmegasubseteqmathbbR$ then $f$ is constant and not injective. Does the same hold in $mathbbR^n$?
Thanks
real-analysis examples-counterexamples inverse-function-theorem
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In my class we stated the theorem as follows:
Let $OmegasubseteqmathbbR^n$ be an open set and $f:OmegatomathbbR^n$ a $mathscrC^1(Omega)$ function. If $|J_f(a)|ne0$ for some $ainOmega$ then there exists $delta>0$ such that $g:=fvert_B(a,delta)$ is injective and ...
This only is a sufficient condition, so is there any function whose jacobian has determinant $0$ at every point but still is injective? If the determinant only vanished on one single point something similar to $f(x)=x^3$ at $x=0$ in $mathbbR$ would do the trick, but if $|f'(x)|=0$ for every $xinOmegasubseteqmathbbR$ then $f$ is constant and not injective. Does the same hold in $mathbbR^n$?
Thanks
real-analysis examples-counterexamples inverse-function-theorem
$endgroup$
In my class we stated the theorem as follows:
Let $OmegasubseteqmathbbR^n$ be an open set and $f:OmegatomathbbR^n$ a $mathscrC^1(Omega)$ function. If $|J_f(a)|ne0$ for some $ainOmega$ then there exists $delta>0$ such that $g:=fvert_B(a,delta)$ is injective and ...
This only is a sufficient condition, so is there any function whose jacobian has determinant $0$ at every point but still is injective? If the determinant only vanished on one single point something similar to $f(x)=x^3$ at $x=0$ in $mathbbR$ would do the trick, but if $|f'(x)|=0$ for every $xinOmegasubseteqmathbbR$ then $f$ is constant and not injective. Does the same hold in $mathbbR^n$?
Thanks
real-analysis examples-counterexamples inverse-function-theorem
real-analysis examples-counterexamples inverse-function-theorem
asked May 15 at 21:59
PedroPedro
623213
623213
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Actually, this is not possible in $mathbbR^n$ either.
Indeed, if you have any $mathscrC^1$ injective function $f: Omega rightarrow mathbbR^n$, then $f$ is open and a homeomorphism on its image (invariance of domain : https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invariance_of_domain ).
From Sard’s theorem (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sard%27s_theorem ), the set of critical values has null measure in $mathbbR^n$, thus has empty interior, thus the set of critical points has no interior as well.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3227626%2fcounterexample-for-the-inverse-function-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Actually, this is not possible in $mathbbR^n$ either.
Indeed, if you have any $mathscrC^1$ injective function $f: Omega rightarrow mathbbR^n$, then $f$ is open and a homeomorphism on its image (invariance of domain : https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invariance_of_domain ).
From Sard’s theorem (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sard%27s_theorem ), the set of critical values has null measure in $mathbbR^n$, thus has empty interior, thus the set of critical points has no interior as well.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Actually, this is not possible in $mathbbR^n$ either.
Indeed, if you have any $mathscrC^1$ injective function $f: Omega rightarrow mathbbR^n$, then $f$ is open and a homeomorphism on its image (invariance of domain : https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invariance_of_domain ).
From Sard’s theorem (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sard%27s_theorem ), the set of critical values has null measure in $mathbbR^n$, thus has empty interior, thus the set of critical points has no interior as well.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Actually, this is not possible in $mathbbR^n$ either.
Indeed, if you have any $mathscrC^1$ injective function $f: Omega rightarrow mathbbR^n$, then $f$ is open and a homeomorphism on its image (invariance of domain : https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invariance_of_domain ).
From Sard’s theorem (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sard%27s_theorem ), the set of critical values has null measure in $mathbbR^n$, thus has empty interior, thus the set of critical points has no interior as well.
$endgroup$
Actually, this is not possible in $mathbbR^n$ either.
Indeed, if you have any $mathscrC^1$ injective function $f: Omega rightarrow mathbbR^n$, then $f$ is open and a homeomorphism on its image (invariance of domain : https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invariance_of_domain ).
From Sard’s theorem (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sard%27s_theorem ), the set of critical values has null measure in $mathbbR^n$, thus has empty interior, thus the set of critical points has no interior as well.
answered May 15 at 22:16
MindlackMindlack
5,325413
5,325413
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3227626%2fcounterexample-for-the-inverse-function-theorem%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown