He is the first man to arrive hereWhat is the meaning of a drag on profit ?'Fall is here' and '<he> has gone full pumpkin'“Until now” ambiguity“Deviate” MeaningsMeaning of “Pushing a lower discount worked”?Meaning of commit and intense hereActual meaning of 'After all'what's the meaning of “the first century” and “or so”?talked to the man dancingTime Expressions with “in”
Is it possible to kill all life on Earth?
Is there a rule that prohibits us from using 2 possessives in a row?
Understanding STM32 datasheet regarding decoupling capacitors
The qvolume of an integer
What does it mean when you think without speaking?
Can a helicopter mask itself from Radar?
Beginner's snake game using PyGame
Thousands and thousands of words
How do I subvert the tropes of a train heist?
Can a wire having a 610-670 THz (frequency of blue light) AC frequency supply, generate blue light?
What caused the tendency for conservatives to not support climate change regulations?
Could I be denied entry into Ireland due to medical and police situations during a previous UK visit?
If a problem only occurs randomly once in every N times on average, how many tests do I have to perform to be certain that it's now fixed?
Are UK pensions taxed twice?
Looking after a wayward brother in mother's will
How should I push back against my job assigning "homework"?
Why would Lupin kill Pettigrew?
Select row of data if next row contains zero
What was this black-and-white film set in the Arctic or Antarctic where the monster/alien gets fried in the end?
Fastest way to perform complex search on pandas dataframe
How did early x86 BIOS programmers manage to program full blown TUIs given very few bytes of ROM/EPROM?
Can a rogue effectively triple their speed by combining Dash and Ready?
How crucial is a waifu game storyline?
What does "tea juice" mean in this context?
He is the first man to arrive here
What is the meaning of a drag on profit ?'Fall is here' and '<he> has gone full pumpkin'“Until now” ambiguity“Deviate” MeaningsMeaning of “Pushing a lower discount worked”?Meaning of commit and intense hereActual meaning of 'After all'what's the meaning of “the first century” and “or so”?talked to the man dancingTime Expressions with “in”
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
He is the first man to arrive here.
I'm confused what this sentence means.
I think it could mean either of the options below according to context, like
- He is the first man who is going to arrive here.
- He is the first man who has just arrived here.
meaning ambiguity
edited May 16 at 13:34
ColleenV♦
10.5k53262
asked May 15 at 22:43
FloretFloret
9201926
add a comment |
He is the first man to arrive here.
I'm confused what this sentence means.
I think it could mean either of the options below according to context, like
- He is the first man who is going to arrive here.
- He is the first man who has just arrived here.
meaning ambiguity
edited May 16 at 13:34
ColleenV♦
10.5k53262
asked May 15 at 22:43
FloretFloret
9201926
add a comment |
He is the first man to arrive here.
I'm confused what this sentence means.
I think it could mean either of the options below according to context, like
- He is the first man who is going to arrive here.
- He is the first man who has just arrived here.
meaning ambiguity
edited May 16 at 13:34
ColleenV♦
10.5k53262
asked May 15 at 22:43
FloretFloret
9201926
He is the first man to arrive here.
I'm confused what this sentence means.
I think it could mean either of the options below according to context, like
- He is the first man who is going to arrive here.
- He is the first man who has just arrived here.
meaning ambiguity
meaning ambiguity
edited May 16 at 13:34
ColleenV♦
10.5k53262
asked May 15 at 22:43
FloretFloret
9201926
edited May 16 at 13:34
ColleenV♦
10.5k53262
asked May 15 at 22:43
FloretFloret
9201926
edited May 16 at 13:34
ColleenV♦
10.5k53262
edited May 16 at 13:34
ColleenV♦
10.5k53262
edited May 16 at 13:34
ColleenV♦
10.5k53262
10.5k53262
asked May 15 at 22:43
FloretFloret
9201926
asked May 15 at 22:43
FloretFloret
9201926
asked May 15 at 22:43
FloretFloret
9201926
9201926
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
It means exactly what it says. If there are one or more people who have come from somewhere else, then it describes the first man to have arrived.
It doesn't necessarily mean that he has just arrived.
If the event were being commentated on, the sentence could be spoken when the man appears. Many hours later, especially if no other man has arrived, the sentence could be spoken again—although, in that case, it would probably be more common (although not essential) to say he is still the first man to arrive here.
In another scenario, consider a fantasy story involving a quest that has always been completed by women:
Although many women have done so, he is the first man to complete the quest.
He could have completed the quest many years ago, but you could still use the present tense while he is alive. (If he were to die, then the past tense would need to be used.)
Just because it happened at some point in the past doesn't mean that you have to use the past tense when you are talking about a still-existing quality of a person. If something is still true, or if it's a general truth, the present tense can be used in addition to the past tense.
answered May 15 at 22:58
Jason BassfordJason Bassford
20.3k22543
Will not it mean option 1 in any situations?
– Man_From_India
May 19 at 11:25
@Man_From_India The only possible scenario where I can see that would be something like a group of people going over a plan (such as in a strategy session for a robbery). They point at a map and one of them says, "Nancy cuts the power here. Then Rick is the first [man] to arrive here." In that very specific circumstance, the present tense and future tense could be mixed. But, normally, it would be considered a mistake. Instead, it would be he will be the first man to arrive here.
– Jason Bassford
May 19 at 14:00
what about this sentence? "He is the last man to arrive". Consider a situation where all the guests have arrived, only one person is yet to come. In that situation, won't that sentence mean that he is yet to arrive?
– Man_From_India
May 19 at 15:49
@Man_From_India No, that's fine. It's the same construction as he is the first man to complete the quest. It means that he not only was the last man to arrive—but, being alive, can claim that description about himself, since it is still a true statement.
– Jason Bassford
May 19 at 15:56
I am sorry friend, I didn't understand you clearly. Can you please say in in other way?
– Man_From_India
May 19 at 16:14
|
show 1 more comment
You are correct. It can mean both things depending on the context. The context will tell you if it is describing something that is scheduled for the future, or something that has happened in the past.
answered May 15 at 23:12
ValkorValkor
2643
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f210902%2fhe-is-the-first-man-to-arrive-here%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It means exactly what it says. If there are one or more people who have come from somewhere else, then it describes the first man to have arrived.
It doesn't necessarily mean that he has just arrived.
If the event were being commentated on, the sentence could be spoken when the man appears. Many hours later, especially if no other man has arrived, the sentence could be spoken again—although, in that case, it would probably be more common (although not essential) to say he is still the first man to arrive here.
In another scenario, consider a fantasy story involving a quest that has always been completed by women:
Although many women have done so, he is the first man to complete the quest.
He could have completed the quest many years ago, but you could still use the present tense while he is alive. (If he were to die, then the past tense would need to be used.)
Just because it happened at some point in the past doesn't mean that you have to use the past tense when you are talking about a still-existing quality of a person. If something is still true, or if it's a general truth, the present tense can be used in addition to the past tense.
answered May 15 at 22:58
Jason BassfordJason Bassford
20.3k22543
Will not it mean option 1 in any situations?
– Man_From_India
May 19 at 11:25
@Man_From_India The only possible scenario where I can see that would be something like a group of people going over a plan (such as in a strategy session for a robbery). They point at a map and one of them says, "Nancy cuts the power here. Then Rick is the first [man] to arrive here." In that very specific circumstance, the present tense and future tense could be mixed. But, normally, it would be considered a mistake. Instead, it would be he will be the first man to arrive here.
– Jason Bassford
May 19 at 14:00
what about this sentence? "He is the last man to arrive". Consider a situation where all the guests have arrived, only one person is yet to come. In that situation, won't that sentence mean that he is yet to arrive?
– Man_From_India
May 19 at 15:49
@Man_From_India No, that's fine. It's the same construction as he is the first man to complete the quest. It means that he not only was the last man to arrive—but, being alive, can claim that description about himself, since it is still a true statement.
– Jason Bassford
May 19 at 15:56
I am sorry friend, I didn't understand you clearly. Can you please say in in other way?
– Man_From_India
May 19 at 16:14
|
show 1 more comment
It means exactly what it says. If there are one or more people who have come from somewhere else, then it describes the first man to have arrived.
It doesn't necessarily mean that he has just arrived.
If the event were being commentated on, the sentence could be spoken when the man appears. Many hours later, especially if no other man has arrived, the sentence could be spoken again—although, in that case, it would probably be more common (although not essential) to say he is still the first man to arrive here.
In another scenario, consider a fantasy story involving a quest that has always been completed by women:
Although many women have done so, he is the first man to complete the quest.
He could have completed the quest many years ago, but you could still use the present tense while he is alive. (If he were to die, then the past tense would need to be used.)
Just because it happened at some point in the past doesn't mean that you have to use the past tense when you are talking about a still-existing quality of a person. If something is still true, or if it's a general truth, the present tense can be used in addition to the past tense.
answered May 15 at 22:58
Jason BassfordJason Bassford
20.3k22543
Will not it mean option 1 in any situations?
– Man_From_India
May 19 at 11:25
@Man_From_India The only possible scenario where I can see that would be something like a group of people going over a plan (such as in a strategy session for a robbery). They point at a map and one of them says, "Nancy cuts the power here. Then Rick is the first [man] to arrive here." In that very specific circumstance, the present tense and future tense could be mixed. But, normally, it would be considered a mistake. Instead, it would be he will be the first man to arrive here.
– Jason Bassford
May 19 at 14:00
what about this sentence? "He is the last man to arrive". Consider a situation where all the guests have arrived, only one person is yet to come. In that situation, won't that sentence mean that he is yet to arrive?
– Man_From_India
May 19 at 15:49
@Man_From_India No, that's fine. It's the same construction as he is the first man to complete the quest. It means that he not only was the last man to arrive—but, being alive, can claim that description about himself, since it is still a true statement.
– Jason Bassford
May 19 at 15:56
I am sorry friend, I didn't understand you clearly. Can you please say in in other way?
– Man_From_India
May 19 at 16:14
|
show 1 more comment
It means exactly what it says. If there are one or more people who have come from somewhere else, then it describes the first man to have arrived.
It doesn't necessarily mean that he has just arrived.
If the event were being commentated on, the sentence could be spoken when the man appears. Many hours later, especially if no other man has arrived, the sentence could be spoken again—although, in that case, it would probably be more common (although not essential) to say he is still the first man to arrive here.
In another scenario, consider a fantasy story involving a quest that has always been completed by women:
Although many women have done so, he is the first man to complete the quest.
He could have completed the quest many years ago, but you could still use the present tense while he is alive. (If he were to die, then the past tense would need to be used.)
Just because it happened at some point in the past doesn't mean that you have to use the past tense when you are talking about a still-existing quality of a person. If something is still true, or if it's a general truth, the present tense can be used in addition to the past tense.
answered May 15 at 22:58
Jason BassfordJason Bassford
20.3k22543
It means exactly what it says. If there are one or more people who have come from somewhere else, then it describes the first man to have arrived.
It doesn't necessarily mean that he has just arrived.
If the event were being commentated on, the sentence could be spoken when the man appears. Many hours later, especially if no other man has arrived, the sentence could be spoken again—although, in that case, it would probably be more common (although not essential) to say he is still the first man to arrive here.
In another scenario, consider a fantasy story involving a quest that has always been completed by women:
Although many women have done so, he is the first man to complete the quest.
He could have completed the quest many years ago, but you could still use the present tense while he is alive. (If he were to die, then the past tense would need to be used.)
Just because it happened at some point in the past doesn't mean that you have to use the past tense when you are talking about a still-existing quality of a person. If something is still true, or if it's a general truth, the present tense can be used in addition to the past tense.
answered May 15 at 22:58
Jason BassfordJason Bassford
20.3k22543
answered May 15 at 22:58
Jason BassfordJason Bassford
20.3k22543
answered May 15 at 22:58
Jason BassfordJason Bassford
20.3k22543
answered May 15 at 22:58
Jason BassfordJason Bassford
20.3k22543
20.3k22543
Will not it mean option 1 in any situations?
– Man_From_India
May 19 at 11:25
@Man_From_India The only possible scenario where I can see that would be something like a group of people going over a plan (such as in a strategy session for a robbery). They point at a map and one of them says, "Nancy cuts the power here. Then Rick is the first [man] to arrive here." In that very specific circumstance, the present tense and future tense could be mixed. But, normally, it would be considered a mistake. Instead, it would be he will be the first man to arrive here.
– Jason Bassford
May 19 at 14:00
what about this sentence? "He is the last man to arrive". Consider a situation where all the guests have arrived, only one person is yet to come. In that situation, won't that sentence mean that he is yet to arrive?
– Man_From_India
May 19 at 15:49
@Man_From_India No, that's fine. It's the same construction as he is the first man to complete the quest. It means that he not only was the last man to arrive—but, being alive, can claim that description about himself, since it is still a true statement.
– Jason Bassford
May 19 at 15:56
I am sorry friend, I didn't understand you clearly. Can you please say in in other way?
– Man_From_India
May 19 at 16:14
|
show 1 more comment
Will not it mean option 1 in any situations?
– Man_From_India
May 19 at 11:25
@Man_From_India The only possible scenario where I can see that would be something like a group of people going over a plan (such as in a strategy session for a robbery). They point at a map and one of them says, "Nancy cuts the power here. Then Rick is the first [man] to arrive here." In that very specific circumstance, the present tense and future tense could be mixed. But, normally, it would be considered a mistake. Instead, it would be he will be the first man to arrive here.
– Jason Bassford
May 19 at 14:00
what about this sentence? "He is the last man to arrive". Consider a situation where all the guests have arrived, only one person is yet to come. In that situation, won't that sentence mean that he is yet to arrive?
– Man_From_India
May 19 at 15:49
@Man_From_India No, that's fine. It's the same construction as he is the first man to complete the quest. It means that he not only was the last man to arrive—but, being alive, can claim that description about himself, since it is still a true statement.
– Jason Bassford
May 19 at 15:56
I am sorry friend, I didn't understand you clearly. Can you please say in in other way?
– Man_From_India
May 19 at 16:14
Will not it mean option 1 in any situations?
– Man_From_India
May 19 at 11:25
Will not it mean option 1 in any situations?
– Man_From_India
May 19 at 11:25
@Man_From_India The only possible scenario where I can see that would be something like a group of people going over a plan (such as in a strategy session for a robbery). They point at a map and one of them says, "Nancy cuts the power here. Then Rick is the first [man] to arrive here." In that very specific circumstance, the present tense and future tense could be mixed. But, normally, it would be considered a mistake. Instead, it would be he will be the first man to arrive here.
– Jason Bassford
May 19 at 14:00
@Man_From_India The only possible scenario where I can see that would be something like a group of people going over a plan (such as in a strategy session for a robbery). They point at a map and one of them says, "Nancy cuts the power here. Then Rick is the first [man] to arrive here." In that very specific circumstance, the present tense and future tense could be mixed. But, normally, it would be considered a mistake. Instead, it would be he will be the first man to arrive here.
– Jason Bassford
May 19 at 14:00
what about this sentence? "He is the last man to arrive". Consider a situation where all the guests have arrived, only one person is yet to come. In that situation, won't that sentence mean that he is yet to arrive?
– Man_From_India
May 19 at 15:49
what about this sentence? "He is the last man to arrive". Consider a situation where all the guests have arrived, only one person is yet to come. In that situation, won't that sentence mean that he is yet to arrive?
– Man_From_India
May 19 at 15:49
@Man_From_India No, that's fine. It's the same construction as he is the first man to complete the quest. It means that he not only was the last man to arrive—but, being alive, can claim that description about himself, since it is still a true statement.
– Jason Bassford
May 19 at 15:56
@Man_From_India No, that's fine. It's the same construction as he is the first man to complete the quest. It means that he not only was the last man to arrive—but, being alive, can claim that description about himself, since it is still a true statement.
– Jason Bassford
May 19 at 15:56
I am sorry friend, I didn't understand you clearly. Can you please say in in other way?
– Man_From_India
May 19 at 16:14
I am sorry friend, I didn't understand you clearly. Can you please say in in other way?
– Man_From_India
May 19 at 16:14
|
show 1 more comment
You are correct. It can mean both things depending on the context. The context will tell you if it is describing something that is scheduled for the future, or something that has happened in the past.
answered May 15 at 23:12
ValkorValkor
2643
add a comment |
You are correct. It can mean both things depending on the context. The context will tell you if it is describing something that is scheduled for the future, or something that has happened in the past.
answered May 15 at 23:12
ValkorValkor
2643
add a comment |
You are correct. It can mean both things depending on the context. The context will tell you if it is describing something that is scheduled for the future, or something that has happened in the past.
answered May 15 at 23:12
ValkorValkor
2643
You are correct. It can mean both things depending on the context. The context will tell you if it is describing something that is scheduled for the future, or something that has happened in the past.
answered May 15 at 23:12
ValkorValkor
2643
answered May 15 at 23:12
ValkorValkor
2643
answered May 15 at 23:12
ValkorValkor
2643
answered May 15 at 23:12
ValkorValkor
2643
2643
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f210902%2fhe-is-the-first-man-to-arrive-here%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
