Top reports a different memory utilization than monitoring scripts from CloudWatchWhy does top report a different cpu usage than CloudWatch?Why does top report a different cpu usage than CloudWatch?Amazon CloudWatch Monitoring Scripts different from df commandWhere is my RAM going?AWS RDS db.t2 instance performance thresholds & monitoringTTFB Longer on Google Cloud than AWS with same config
Multi tool use
etoolbox: AtBeginEnvironment is not At Begin Environment
What's the most polite way to tell a manager "shut up and let me work"?
Uncommanded roll at high speed
Is it possible to kill all life on Earth?
If a massive object like Jupiter flew past the Earth how close would it need to come to pull people off of the surface?
Strange math syntax in old basic listing
Draw a checker pattern with a black X in the center
Why would Lupin kill Pettigrew?
Modern approach to radio buttons
How do I subvert the tropes of a train heist?
What does it mean when you think without speaking?
Looking after a wayward brother in mother's will
Can an old DSLR be upgraded to match modern smartphone image quality
What does the 0>&1 shell redirection mean?
Can a helicopter mask itself from Radar?
What does the behaviour of water on the skin of an aircraft in flight tell us?
Team member doesn't give me the minimum time to complete a talk
Tic-Tac-Toe for the terminal
Is the world in Game of Thrones spherical or flat?
Is a hash a zero-knowledge proof?
Did airlines fly their aircraft slower in response to oil prices in the 1970s?
Can non-English-speaking characters use wordplay specific to English?
Get LaTeX form from step by step solution
Can a rogue effectively triple their speed by combining Dash and Ready?
Top reports a different memory utilization than monitoring scripts from CloudWatch
Why does top report a different cpu usage than CloudWatch?Why does top report a different cpu usage than CloudWatch?Amazon CloudWatch Monitoring Scripts different from df commandWhere is my RAM going?AWS RDS db.t2 instance performance thresholds & monitoringTTFB Longer on Google Cloud than AWS with same config
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
I have the AWS monitoring scripts set up on an EC2 instance to alert me when memory utilization is over 75%. Currently, I am sending all of the memory related parameters to Cloudwatch, but only have a Cloudwatch alert set up for mem-util.
On Cloudwatch, I see a memory utilization of over 97%
However, when running the top command, I get a very different memory utilization of roughly 74%:
Tasks: 101 total, 1 running, 61 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
%Cpu(s): 0.3 us, 0.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 99.7 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
KiB Mem : 8166940 total, 212124 free, 6232712 used, 1722104 buff/cache
KiB Swap: 0 total, 0 free, 0 used. 1634048 avail Mem
I saw a similar thread for CPU usage statistic discrepancy, and am wondering if the same issues apply here. More importantly, which of the two is more reliable in the context of managing the available memory?
amazon-web-services
asked May 16 at 4:14
shingishingi
32
add a comment |
I have the AWS monitoring scripts set up on an EC2 instance to alert me when memory utilization is over 75%. Currently, I am sending all of the memory related parameters to Cloudwatch, but only have a Cloudwatch alert set up for mem-util.
On Cloudwatch, I see a memory utilization of over 97%
However, when running the top command, I get a very different memory utilization of roughly 74%:
Tasks: 101 total, 1 running, 61 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
%Cpu(s): 0.3 us, 0.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 99.7 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
KiB Mem : 8166940 total, 212124 free, 6232712 used, 1722104 buff/cache
KiB Swap: 0 total, 0 free, 0 used. 1634048 avail Mem
I saw a similar thread for CPU usage statistic discrepancy, and am wondering if the same issues apply here. More importantly, which of the two is more reliable in the context of managing the available memory?
amazon-web-services
asked May 16 at 4:14
shingishingi
32
2
Which of the memory statistics are you sending to CloudWatch? mem-util, mem-used, or -mem-used-incl-cache-buff? This is a parameter to the scripts. Please edit your question to show the command line, and then reply to the comment so I see it's changed.
– Tim
May 16 at 7:59
I'm using mem-util
– shingi
May 16 at 14:05
add a comment |
I have the AWS monitoring scripts set up on an EC2 instance to alert me when memory utilization is over 75%. Currently, I am sending all of the memory related parameters to Cloudwatch, but only have a Cloudwatch alert set up for mem-util.
On Cloudwatch, I see a memory utilization of over 97%
However, when running the top command, I get a very different memory utilization of roughly 74%:
Tasks: 101 total, 1 running, 61 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
%Cpu(s): 0.3 us, 0.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 99.7 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
KiB Mem : 8166940 total, 212124 free, 6232712 used, 1722104 buff/cache
KiB Swap: 0 total, 0 free, 0 used. 1634048 avail Mem
I saw a similar thread for CPU usage statistic discrepancy, and am wondering if the same issues apply here. More importantly, which of the two is more reliable in the context of managing the available memory?
amazon-web-services
asked May 16 at 4:14
shingishingi
32
I have the AWS monitoring scripts set up on an EC2 instance to alert me when memory utilization is over 75%. Currently, I am sending all of the memory related parameters to Cloudwatch, but only have a Cloudwatch alert set up for mem-util.
On Cloudwatch, I see a memory utilization of over 97%
However, when running the top command, I get a very different memory utilization of roughly 74%:
Tasks: 101 total, 1 running, 61 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
%Cpu(s): 0.3 us, 0.0 sy, 0.0 ni, 99.7 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
KiB Mem : 8166940 total, 212124 free, 6232712 used, 1722104 buff/cache
KiB Swap: 0 total, 0 free, 0 used. 1634048 avail Mem
I saw a similar thread for CPU usage statistic discrepancy, and am wondering if the same issues apply here. More importantly, which of the two is more reliable in the context of managing the available memory?
amazon-web-services
amazon-web-services
asked May 16 at 4:14
shingishingi
32
asked May 16 at 4:14
shingishingi
32
edited May 16 at 14:04
shingi
asked May 16 at 4:14
shingishingi
32
asked May 16 at 4:14
shingishingi
32
asked May 16 at 4:14
shingishingi
32
32
2
Which of the memory statistics are you sending to CloudWatch? mem-util, mem-used, or -mem-used-incl-cache-buff? This is a parameter to the scripts. Please edit your question to show the command line, and then reply to the comment so I see it's changed.
– Tim
May 16 at 7:59
I'm using mem-util
– shingi
May 16 at 14:05
add a comment |
2
Which of the memory statistics are you sending to CloudWatch? mem-util, mem-used, or -mem-used-incl-cache-buff? This is a parameter to the scripts. Please edit your question to show the command line, and then reply to the comment so I see it's changed.
– Tim
May 16 at 7:59
I'm using mem-util
– shingi
May 16 at 14:05
2
2
Which of the memory statistics are you sending to CloudWatch? mem-util, mem-used, or -mem-used-incl-cache-buff? This is a parameter to the scripts. Please edit your question to show the command line, and then reply to the comment so I see it's changed.
– Tim
May 16 at 7:59
Which of the memory statistics are you sending to CloudWatch? mem-util, mem-used, or -mem-used-incl-cache-buff? This is a parameter to the scripts. Please edit your question to show the command line, and then reply to the comment so I see it's changed.
– Tim
May 16 at 7:59
I'm using mem-util
– shingi
May 16 at 14:05
I'm using mem-util
– shingi
May 16 at 14:05
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
It looks like cloudwatch is counting total memory in use, and top is counting memory is use by processes but not for caches/buffers that can be easily reclaimed.
Which is more appropriate depends on your workload.
answered May 16 at 4:33
rsaxvcrsaxvc
1184
If this ec2 instance has a sole purpose of running a single java app - which by itself accounts for 74% of the usage noted by top - and nothing else is running, which one is a better measure of "available memory" from the standpoint of watching for memory leaks?
– shingi
May 16 at 14:09
Then I would be most interested in the amount of memory used either by that process or all processes, and not the total amount including caches and buffers.
– rsaxvc
May 17 at 2:00
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "2"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f967497%2ftop-reports-a-different-memory-utilization-than-monitoring-scripts-from-cloudwat%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It looks like cloudwatch is counting total memory in use, and top is counting memory is use by processes but not for caches/buffers that can be easily reclaimed.
Which is more appropriate depends on your workload.
answered May 16 at 4:33
rsaxvcrsaxvc
1184
If this ec2 instance has a sole purpose of running a single java app - which by itself accounts for 74% of the usage noted by top - and nothing else is running, which one is a better measure of "available memory" from the standpoint of watching for memory leaks?
– shingi
May 16 at 14:09
Then I would be most interested in the amount of memory used either by that process or all processes, and not the total amount including caches and buffers.
– rsaxvc
May 17 at 2:00
add a comment |
It looks like cloudwatch is counting total memory in use, and top is counting memory is use by processes but not for caches/buffers that can be easily reclaimed.
Which is more appropriate depends on your workload.
answered May 16 at 4:33
rsaxvcrsaxvc
1184
If this ec2 instance has a sole purpose of running a single java app - which by itself accounts for 74% of the usage noted by top - and nothing else is running, which one is a better measure of "available memory" from the standpoint of watching for memory leaks?
– shingi
May 16 at 14:09
Then I would be most interested in the amount of memory used either by that process or all processes, and not the total amount including caches and buffers.
– rsaxvc
May 17 at 2:00
add a comment |
It looks like cloudwatch is counting total memory in use, and top is counting memory is use by processes but not for caches/buffers that can be easily reclaimed.
Which is more appropriate depends on your workload.
answered May 16 at 4:33
rsaxvcrsaxvc
1184
It looks like cloudwatch is counting total memory in use, and top is counting memory is use by processes but not for caches/buffers that can be easily reclaimed.
Which is more appropriate depends on your workload.
answered May 16 at 4:33
rsaxvcrsaxvc
1184
answered May 16 at 4:33
rsaxvcrsaxvc
1184
answered May 16 at 4:33
rsaxvcrsaxvc
1184
answered May 16 at 4:33
rsaxvcrsaxvc
1184
1184
If this ec2 instance has a sole purpose of running a single java app - which by itself accounts for 74% of the usage noted by top - and nothing else is running, which one is a better measure of "available memory" from the standpoint of watching for memory leaks?
– shingi
May 16 at 14:09
Then I would be most interested in the amount of memory used either by that process or all processes, and not the total amount including caches and buffers.
– rsaxvc
May 17 at 2:00
add a comment |
If this ec2 instance has a sole purpose of running a single java app - which by itself accounts for 74% of the usage noted by top - and nothing else is running, which one is a better measure of "available memory" from the standpoint of watching for memory leaks?
– shingi
May 16 at 14:09
Then I would be most interested in the amount of memory used either by that process or all processes, and not the total amount including caches and buffers.
– rsaxvc
May 17 at 2:00
If this ec2 instance has a sole purpose of running a single java app - which by itself accounts for 74% of the usage noted by top - and nothing else is running, which one is a better measure of "available memory" from the standpoint of watching for memory leaks?
– shingi
May 16 at 14:09
If this ec2 instance has a sole purpose of running a single java app - which by itself accounts for 74% of the usage noted by top - and nothing else is running, which one is a better measure of "available memory" from the standpoint of watching for memory leaks?
– shingi
May 16 at 14:09
Then I would be most interested in the amount of memory used either by that process or all processes, and not the total amount including caches and buffers.
– rsaxvc
May 17 at 2:00
Then I would be most interested in the amount of memory used either by that process or all processes, and not the total amount including caches and buffers.
– rsaxvc
May 17 at 2:00
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f967497%2ftop-reports-a-different-memory-utilization-than-monitoring-scripts-from-cloudwat%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
c,31eB8BW,Dr1vjZCBgICAndtXuZqYGPM0Q,RjEfXhhkzmBGNZf7T
2
Which of the memory statistics are you sending to CloudWatch? mem-util, mem-used, or -mem-used-incl-cache-buff? This is a parameter to the scripts. Please edit your question to show the command line, and then reply to the comment so I see it's changed.
– Tim
May 16 at 7:59
I'm using mem-util
– shingi
May 16 at 14:05