Have there been any examples of re-usable rockets in the past?Why won't the SLS boosters be recovered?Do any realistic rocket systems use different substances for propellant and fuel?How many 1st stage boosters will SpaceX settle for, for its LEO/GTO fleet?Is the Paramagnetism of Liquid Oxygen Ever Considered in Engine or Tank Design?How do rocket propellant combinations rank in terms of “brightness”?How can phenolic (resin?) handle rocket engine nozzle temperatures?Why didn't the space shuttle use non-foam-shedding external tanks?How far have autophage rockets been developed?Have there been any other cheap, modular launcher designs like the OTRAG?Heat Shielding Material for Reusable CraftIs the BFB/super heavy likely to have an easier time landing than the Falcon 9 booster?
Can an old DSLR be upgraded to match modern smartphone image quality
Are UK pensions taxed twice?
Where did the “vikings wear helmets with horn” stereotype come from and why?
Is there an evolutionary advantage to having two heads?
What are the slash markings on Gatwick's 08R/26L?
What is the indigenous Russian word for a wild boar?
How can I include a header file that contains `>` in its name?
Is the world in Game of Thrones spherical or flat?
If a problem only occurs randomly once in every N times on average, how many tests do I have to perform to be certain that it's now fixed?
What is the intuition behind uniform continuity?
What does the behaviour of water on the skin of an aircraft in flight tell us?
How can I prevent interns from being expendable?
Is this light switch installation safe and legal?
Is it possible to kill all life on Earth?
Infinitely many hats
Does `declare -a A` create an empty array `A` in Bash?
Smart people send dumb people to a new planet on a space craft that crashes into a body of water
Asking bank to reduce APR instead of increasing credit limit
Can a non-EU citizen travel within the Schengen area without identity documents?
The deliberate use of misleading terminology
Can non-English-speaking characters use wordplay specific to English?
Why does the UK have more political parties than the US?
Get LaTeX form from step by step solution
find the Integer value after a string from a file
Have there been any examples of re-usable rockets in the past?
Why won't the SLS boosters be recovered?Do any realistic rocket systems use different substances for propellant and fuel?How many 1st stage boosters will SpaceX settle for, for its LEO/GTO fleet?Is the Paramagnetism of Liquid Oxygen Ever Considered in Engine or Tank Design?How do rocket propellant combinations rank in terms of “brightness”?How can phenolic (resin?) handle rocket engine nozzle temperatures?Why didn't the space shuttle use non-foam-shedding external tanks?How far have autophage rockets been developed?Have there been any other cheap, modular launcher designs like the OTRAG?Heat Shielding Material for Reusable CraftIs the BFB/super heavy likely to have an easier time landing than the Falcon 9 booster?
$begingroup$
I am writing a piece about re-usable rockets and I'm wondering, apart from SpaceX, have there been any re-usable rockets in the past, success or 'failure', as in didn't perform as expected.
Obviously there is the Space shuttle, but any others?
Even examples of partial re-use would be great.
rockets space-shuttle reuse
edited May 15 at 17:41
Russell Borogove
92.7k3312399
asked May 15 at 17:09
RogerRoger
1455
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am writing a piece about re-usable rockets and I'm wondering, apart from SpaceX, have there been any re-usable rockets in the past, success or 'failure', as in didn't perform as expected.
Obviously there is the Space shuttle, but any others?
Even examples of partial re-use would be great.
rockets space-shuttle reuse
edited May 15 at 17:41
Russell Borogove
92.7k3312399
asked May 15 at 17:09
RogerRoger
1455
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Besides the orbiter, did you know that the SRBs were also reusable? I think that might be more relevant when compared to modern reusable rockets. Also the different techniques (parachute vs. powered landing) is interesting.
$endgroup$
– busdriver
May 15 at 19:58
$begingroup$
Related: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_Douglas_DC-X
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
May 15 at 20:03
1
$begingroup$
@busdriver "resusable" is a stretch for the SRBs. They took them apart down to every bolt and screw, then built them up again out of different segments. space.stackexchange.com/a/16865/6944 So they flew again, but never as the same unit. A stack of reusable parts, yes.
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
May 15 at 21:28
$begingroup$
Given you mention the shuttle, would the Gemini space capsule meet your requirements? Gemini 2 was the first true space craft ever to be reused (as opposed to the suborbital X-15) - it flew as part of the Gemini program on 19th jan 1965, and then again as part of the Manned Orbital Laboratory test flight on 3rd November 1966.
$endgroup$
– Moo
May 16 at 0:06
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am writing a piece about re-usable rockets and I'm wondering, apart from SpaceX, have there been any re-usable rockets in the past, success or 'failure', as in didn't perform as expected.
Obviously there is the Space shuttle, but any others?
Even examples of partial re-use would be great.
rockets space-shuttle reuse
edited May 15 at 17:41
Russell Borogove
92.7k3312399
asked May 15 at 17:09
RogerRoger
1455
$endgroup$
I am writing a piece about re-usable rockets and I'm wondering, apart from SpaceX, have there been any re-usable rockets in the past, success or 'failure', as in didn't perform as expected.
Obviously there is the Space shuttle, but any others?
Even examples of partial re-use would be great.
rockets space-shuttle reuse
rockets space-shuttle reuse
edited May 15 at 17:41
Russell Borogove
92.7k3312399
asked May 15 at 17:09
RogerRoger
1455
edited May 15 at 17:41
Russell Borogove
92.7k3312399
asked May 15 at 17:09
RogerRoger
1455
edited May 15 at 17:41
Russell Borogove
92.7k3312399
edited May 15 at 17:41
Russell Borogove
92.7k3312399
edited May 15 at 17:41
Russell Borogove
92.7k3312399
92.7k3312399
asked May 15 at 17:09
RogerRoger
1455
asked May 15 at 17:09
RogerRoger
1455
asked May 15 at 17:09
RogerRoger
1455
1455
$begingroup$
Besides the orbiter, did you know that the SRBs were also reusable? I think that might be more relevant when compared to modern reusable rockets. Also the different techniques (parachute vs. powered landing) is interesting.
$endgroup$
– busdriver
May 15 at 19:58
$begingroup$
Related: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_Douglas_DC-X
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
May 15 at 20:03
1
$begingroup$
@busdriver "resusable" is a stretch for the SRBs. They took them apart down to every bolt and screw, then built them up again out of different segments. space.stackexchange.com/a/16865/6944 So they flew again, but never as the same unit. A stack of reusable parts, yes.
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
May 15 at 21:28
$begingroup$
Given you mention the shuttle, would the Gemini space capsule meet your requirements? Gemini 2 was the first true space craft ever to be reused (as opposed to the suborbital X-15) - it flew as part of the Gemini program on 19th jan 1965, and then again as part of the Manned Orbital Laboratory test flight on 3rd November 1966.
$endgroup$
– Moo
May 16 at 0:06
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Besides the orbiter, did you know that the SRBs were also reusable? I think that might be more relevant when compared to modern reusable rockets. Also the different techniques (parachute vs. powered landing) is interesting.
$endgroup$
– busdriver
May 15 at 19:58
$begingroup$
Related: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_Douglas_DC-X
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
May 15 at 20:03
1
$begingroup$
@busdriver "resusable" is a stretch for the SRBs. They took them apart down to every bolt and screw, then built them up again out of different segments. space.stackexchange.com/a/16865/6944 So they flew again, but never as the same unit. A stack of reusable parts, yes.
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
May 15 at 21:28
$begingroup$
Given you mention the shuttle, would the Gemini space capsule meet your requirements? Gemini 2 was the first true space craft ever to be reused (as opposed to the suborbital X-15) - it flew as part of the Gemini program on 19th jan 1965, and then again as part of the Manned Orbital Laboratory test flight on 3rd November 1966.
$endgroup$
– Moo
May 16 at 0:06
$begingroup$
Besides the orbiter, did you know that the SRBs were also reusable? I think that might be more relevant when compared to modern reusable rockets. Also the different techniques (parachute vs. powered landing) is interesting.
$endgroup$
– busdriver
May 15 at 19:58
$begingroup$
Besides the orbiter, did you know that the SRBs were also reusable? I think that might be more relevant when compared to modern reusable rockets. Also the different techniques (parachute vs. powered landing) is interesting.
$endgroup$
– busdriver
May 15 at 19:58
$begingroup$
Related: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_Douglas_DC-X
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
May 15 at 20:03
$begingroup$
Related: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_Douglas_DC-X
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
May 15 at 20:03
1
1
$begingroup$
@busdriver "resusable" is a stretch for the SRBs. They took them apart down to every bolt and screw, then built them up again out of different segments. space.stackexchange.com/a/16865/6944 So they flew again, but never as the same unit. A stack of reusable parts, yes.
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
May 15 at 21:28
$begingroup$
@busdriver "resusable" is a stretch for the SRBs. They took them apart down to every bolt and screw, then built them up again out of different segments. space.stackexchange.com/a/16865/6944 So they flew again, but never as the same unit. A stack of reusable parts, yes.
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
May 15 at 21:28
$begingroup$
Given you mention the shuttle, would the Gemini space capsule meet your requirements? Gemini 2 was the first true space craft ever to be reused (as opposed to the suborbital X-15) - it flew as part of the Gemini program on 19th jan 1965, and then again as part of the Manned Orbital Laboratory test flight on 3rd November 1966.
$endgroup$
– Moo
May 16 at 0:06
$begingroup$
Given you mention the shuttle, would the Gemini space capsule meet your requirements? Gemini 2 was the first true space craft ever to be reused (as opposed to the suborbital X-15) - it flew as part of the Gemini program on 19th jan 1965, and then again as part of the Manned Orbital Laboratory test flight on 3rd November 1966.
$endgroup$
– Moo
May 16 at 0:06
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The X-37 has now flown several times (4 or 5) between two vehicles.
A lifting body design that launches on top of an Atlas V or Falcon 9 booster. The Falcon 9 being reusable in the first stage increases the percentage reused.
Including Magic Octopus's picture from the comments of a landed X-37B to get relative size.
answered May 15 at 19:06
geoffcgeoffc
56.8k10166319
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
It's like an adorable tiny space shuttle!
$endgroup$
– Magic Octopus Urn
May 15 at 20:18
5
$begingroup$
If we did list questions, we could ask "Which are the cutest rockets?"
$endgroup$
– geoffc
May 15 at 20:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's relatively easy to manage reusability in a rocket if you don't get to orbital speeds.
The X-15 was a rocket powered spaceplane. It was launched from a B-52 jet carrier (at about 13.7km altitude) and flew to the edge of space (several flights to 80km altitude, below the FAI definition of "space", but above the USAF's definition, and two flights above FAI's 100km), but wasn't fast enough to get into orbit. Three were built and flew a total of 199 times between 1959 and 1968. This was a very successful research program, which provided a lot of data for development of the space shuttle as well as demonstrating the value of combining human pilots with automated systems.
Various other rocket-powered aircraft have flown multiple times atmospherically, for example, the Me-163 and Bell X-1, but I imagine you're primarily looking for spacecraft with this question.
answered May 15 at 17:25
Russell BorogoveRussell Borogove
92.7k3312399
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "508"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f36171%2fhave-there-been-any-examples-of-re-usable-rockets-in-the-past%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The X-37 has now flown several times (4 or 5) between two vehicles.
A lifting body design that launches on top of an Atlas V or Falcon 9 booster. The Falcon 9 being reusable in the first stage increases the percentage reused.
Including Magic Octopus's picture from the comments of a landed X-37B to get relative size.
answered May 15 at 19:06
geoffcgeoffc
56.8k10166319
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
It's like an adorable tiny space shuttle!
$endgroup$
– Magic Octopus Urn
May 15 at 20:18
5
$begingroup$
If we did list questions, we could ask "Which are the cutest rockets?"
$endgroup$
– geoffc
May 15 at 20:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The X-37 has now flown several times (4 or 5) between two vehicles.
A lifting body design that launches on top of an Atlas V or Falcon 9 booster. The Falcon 9 being reusable in the first stage increases the percentage reused.
Including Magic Octopus's picture from the comments of a landed X-37B to get relative size.
answered May 15 at 19:06
geoffcgeoffc
56.8k10166319
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
It's like an adorable tiny space shuttle!
$endgroup$
– Magic Octopus Urn
May 15 at 20:18
5
$begingroup$
If we did list questions, we could ask "Which are the cutest rockets?"
$endgroup$
– geoffc
May 15 at 20:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The X-37 has now flown several times (4 or 5) between two vehicles.
A lifting body design that launches on top of an Atlas V or Falcon 9 booster. The Falcon 9 being reusable in the first stage increases the percentage reused.
Including Magic Octopus's picture from the comments of a landed X-37B to get relative size.
answered May 15 at 19:06
geoffcgeoffc
56.8k10166319
$endgroup$
The X-37 has now flown several times (4 or 5) between two vehicles.
A lifting body design that launches on top of an Atlas V or Falcon 9 booster. The Falcon 9 being reusable in the first stage increases the percentage reused.
Including Magic Octopus's picture from the comments of a landed X-37B to get relative size.
answered May 15 at 19:06
geoffcgeoffc
56.8k10166319
edited May 15 at 20:47
answered May 15 at 19:06
geoffcgeoffc
56.8k10166319
answered May 15 at 19:06
geoffcgeoffc
56.8k10166319
answered May 15 at 19:06
geoffcgeoffc
56.8k10166319
56.8k10166319
4
$begingroup$
It's like an adorable tiny space shuttle!
$endgroup$
– Magic Octopus Urn
May 15 at 20:18
5
$begingroup$
If we did list questions, we could ask "Which are the cutest rockets?"
$endgroup$
– geoffc
May 15 at 20:46
add a comment |
4
$begingroup$
It's like an adorable tiny space shuttle!
$endgroup$
– Magic Octopus Urn
May 15 at 20:18
5
$begingroup$
If we did list questions, we could ask "Which are the cutest rockets?"
$endgroup$
– geoffc
May 15 at 20:46
4
4
$begingroup$
It's like an adorable tiny space shuttle!
$endgroup$
– Magic Octopus Urn
May 15 at 20:18
$begingroup$
It's like an adorable tiny space shuttle!
$endgroup$
– Magic Octopus Urn
May 15 at 20:18
5
5
$begingroup$
If we did list questions, we could ask "Which are the cutest rockets?"
$endgroup$
– geoffc
May 15 at 20:46
$begingroup$
If we did list questions, we could ask "Which are the cutest rockets?"
$endgroup$
– geoffc
May 15 at 20:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's relatively easy to manage reusability in a rocket if you don't get to orbital speeds.
The X-15 was a rocket powered spaceplane. It was launched from a B-52 jet carrier (at about 13.7km altitude) and flew to the edge of space (several flights to 80km altitude, below the FAI definition of "space", but above the USAF's definition, and two flights above FAI's 100km), but wasn't fast enough to get into orbit. Three were built and flew a total of 199 times between 1959 and 1968. This was a very successful research program, which provided a lot of data for development of the space shuttle as well as demonstrating the value of combining human pilots with automated systems.
Various other rocket-powered aircraft have flown multiple times atmospherically, for example, the Me-163 and Bell X-1, but I imagine you're primarily looking for spacecraft with this question.
answered May 15 at 17:25
Russell BorogoveRussell Borogove
92.7k3312399
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's relatively easy to manage reusability in a rocket if you don't get to orbital speeds.
The X-15 was a rocket powered spaceplane. It was launched from a B-52 jet carrier (at about 13.7km altitude) and flew to the edge of space (several flights to 80km altitude, below the FAI definition of "space", but above the USAF's definition, and two flights above FAI's 100km), but wasn't fast enough to get into orbit. Three were built and flew a total of 199 times between 1959 and 1968. This was a very successful research program, which provided a lot of data for development of the space shuttle as well as demonstrating the value of combining human pilots with automated systems.
Various other rocket-powered aircraft have flown multiple times atmospherically, for example, the Me-163 and Bell X-1, but I imagine you're primarily looking for spacecraft with this question.
answered May 15 at 17:25
Russell BorogoveRussell Borogove
92.7k3312399
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
It's relatively easy to manage reusability in a rocket if you don't get to orbital speeds.
The X-15 was a rocket powered spaceplane. It was launched from a B-52 jet carrier (at about 13.7km altitude) and flew to the edge of space (several flights to 80km altitude, below the FAI definition of "space", but above the USAF's definition, and two flights above FAI's 100km), but wasn't fast enough to get into orbit. Three were built and flew a total of 199 times between 1959 and 1968. This was a very successful research program, which provided a lot of data for development of the space shuttle as well as demonstrating the value of combining human pilots with automated systems.
Various other rocket-powered aircraft have flown multiple times atmospherically, for example, the Me-163 and Bell X-1, but I imagine you're primarily looking for spacecraft with this question.
answered May 15 at 17:25
Russell BorogoveRussell Borogove
92.7k3312399
$endgroup$
It's relatively easy to manage reusability in a rocket if you don't get to orbital speeds.
The X-15 was a rocket powered spaceplane. It was launched from a B-52 jet carrier (at about 13.7km altitude) and flew to the edge of space (several flights to 80km altitude, below the FAI definition of "space", but above the USAF's definition, and two flights above FAI's 100km), but wasn't fast enough to get into orbit. Three were built and flew a total of 199 times between 1959 and 1968. This was a very successful research program, which provided a lot of data for development of the space shuttle as well as demonstrating the value of combining human pilots with automated systems.
Various other rocket-powered aircraft have flown multiple times atmospherically, for example, the Me-163 and Bell X-1, but I imagine you're primarily looking for spacecraft with this question.
answered May 15 at 17:25
Russell BorogoveRussell Borogove
92.7k3312399
edited May 15 at 17:32
answered May 15 at 17:25
Russell BorogoveRussell Borogove
92.7k3312399
answered May 15 at 17:25
Russell BorogoveRussell Borogove
92.7k3312399
answered May 15 at 17:25
Russell BorogoveRussell Borogove
92.7k3312399
92.7k3312399
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Space Exploration Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f36171%2fhave-there-been-any-examples-of-re-usable-rockets-in-the-past%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Besides the orbiter, did you know that the SRBs were also reusable? I think that might be more relevant when compared to modern reusable rockets. Also the different techniques (parachute vs. powered landing) is interesting.
$endgroup$
– busdriver
May 15 at 19:58
$begingroup$
Related: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_Douglas_DC-X
$endgroup$
– Polygnome
May 15 at 20:03
1
$begingroup$
@busdriver "resusable" is a stretch for the SRBs. They took them apart down to every bolt and screw, then built them up again out of different segments. space.stackexchange.com/a/16865/6944 So they flew again, but never as the same unit. A stack of reusable parts, yes.
$endgroup$
– Organic Marble
May 15 at 21:28
$begingroup$
Given you mention the shuttle, would the Gemini space capsule meet your requirements? Gemini 2 was the first true space craft ever to be reused (as opposed to the suborbital X-15) - it flew as part of the Gemini program on 19th jan 1965, and then again as part of the Manned Orbital Laboratory test flight on 3rd November 1966.
$endgroup$
– Moo
May 16 at 0:06