Find hamming distance between two Strings of equal length in JavaEdit Distance Between Two StringsCalculating and displaying number statisticsAcquiring indices for anagrams of an input stringEdit distance between 2 stringsA sequence of mistakesAssignement on reading from stdin in CHamming distance between numbers in JavaScriptCalculation of Hamming distance between two adjacency listsHamming distanceJava class named HeadPhone to represent a headphone set
Could a 19.25mm revolver actually exist?
Why aren't space telescopes put in GEO?
What is a Centaur Thief's climbing speed?
Caught 2 students cheating together on the final exam that I proctored
What are these arcade games in Ghostbusters 1984?
Where can I find visible/radio telescopic observations of the center of the Milky Way galaxy?
Is real public IP Address hidden when using a system wide proxy in Windows 10?
What to keep in mind when telling an aunt how wrong her actions are, without creating further family conflict?
How to use libraries with delays inside within a time critical STM32 HAL application?
number headings
Where have Brexit voters gone?
Popcorn is the only acceptable snack to consume while watching a movie
Why does this if-statement combining assignment and an equality check return true?
Are these reasonable traits for someone with autism?
How to respond to an upset student?
The art of clickbait captions
How to know if a folder is a symbolic link?
NIntegrate doesn't evaluate
How do I partition a matrx into blocks and replace zeros with dots?
Python program to take in two strings and print the larger string
Did 20% of US soldiers in Vietnam use heroin, 95% of whom quit afterwards?
Boss wants me to falsify a report. How should I document this unethical demand?
Externally monitoring CPU/SSD activity without software access
Why did David Cameron offer a referendum on the European Union?
Find hamming distance between two Strings of equal length in Java
Edit Distance Between Two StringsCalculating and displaying number statisticsAcquiring indices for anagrams of an input stringEdit distance between 2 stringsA sequence of mistakesAssignement on reading from stdin in CHamming distance between numbers in JavaScriptCalculation of Hamming distance between two adjacency listsHamming distanceJava class named HeadPhone to represent a headphone set
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
I have a private class that I want to be able to find the shortest Hamming Distance between two Strings of equal length in Java. The private class holds a char[]
and contains a method to compare against other char arrays. It returns true if there is only a hamming distance of one.
The average length of the Strings used is 9 characters. They range from 1 to 24 characters.
Is there a way to make the isDistanceOne(char[])
method go any faster?
private class WordArray
char[] word;
/**
* Creates a new WordArray object.
*
* @param word The word to add to the WordArray.
*/
private WordArray(String word)
this.word = word.toCharArray();
/**
* Returns whether the argument is within a Hamming Distance of one from
* the char[] contained in the WordArray.
*
* Both char[]s should be of the same length.
*
* @param otherWord The word to compare with this.word.
* @return boolean.
*/
private boolean isDistanceOne(char[] otherWord)
int count = 0;
for(int i = 0; i < otherWord.length; i++)
if (this.word[i] != otherWord[i])
count++;
return (count == 1);
java performance strings array edit-distance
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have a private class that I want to be able to find the shortest Hamming Distance between two Strings of equal length in Java. The private class holds a char[]
and contains a method to compare against other char arrays. It returns true if there is only a hamming distance of one.
The average length of the Strings used is 9 characters. They range from 1 to 24 characters.
Is there a way to make the isDistanceOne(char[])
method go any faster?
private class WordArray
char[] word;
/**
* Creates a new WordArray object.
*
* @param word The word to add to the WordArray.
*/
private WordArray(String word)
this.word = word.toCharArray();
/**
* Returns whether the argument is within a Hamming Distance of one from
* the char[] contained in the WordArray.
*
* Both char[]s should be of the same length.
*
* @param otherWord The word to compare with this.word.
* @return boolean.
*/
private boolean isDistanceOne(char[] otherWord)
int count = 0;
for(int i = 0; i < otherWord.length; i++)
if (this.word[i] != otherWord[i])
count++;
return (count == 1);
java performance strings array edit-distance
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
How large are the Strings? The fastest solution would differ for many short Strings versus very large strings
$endgroup$
– dustytrash
May 12 at 17:52
$begingroup$
@dustytrash The range is from 1 to 24. The average length is 9. I've edited my question to mention this.
$endgroup$
– LuminousNutria
May 12 at 18:04
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have a private class that I want to be able to find the shortest Hamming Distance between two Strings of equal length in Java. The private class holds a char[]
and contains a method to compare against other char arrays. It returns true if there is only a hamming distance of one.
The average length of the Strings used is 9 characters. They range from 1 to 24 characters.
Is there a way to make the isDistanceOne(char[])
method go any faster?
private class WordArray
char[] word;
/**
* Creates a new WordArray object.
*
* @param word The word to add to the WordArray.
*/
private WordArray(String word)
this.word = word.toCharArray();
/**
* Returns whether the argument is within a Hamming Distance of one from
* the char[] contained in the WordArray.
*
* Both char[]s should be of the same length.
*
* @param otherWord The word to compare with this.word.
* @return boolean.
*/
private boolean isDistanceOne(char[] otherWord)
int count = 0;
for(int i = 0; i < otherWord.length; i++)
if (this.word[i] != otherWord[i])
count++;
return (count == 1);
java performance strings array edit-distance
$endgroup$
I have a private class that I want to be able to find the shortest Hamming Distance between two Strings of equal length in Java. The private class holds a char[]
and contains a method to compare against other char arrays. It returns true if there is only a hamming distance of one.
The average length of the Strings used is 9 characters. They range from 1 to 24 characters.
Is there a way to make the isDistanceOne(char[])
method go any faster?
private class WordArray
char[] word;
/**
* Creates a new WordArray object.
*
* @param word The word to add to the WordArray.
*/
private WordArray(String word)
this.word = word.toCharArray();
/**
* Returns whether the argument is within a Hamming Distance of one from
* the char[] contained in the WordArray.
*
* Both char[]s should be of the same length.
*
* @param otherWord The word to compare with this.word.
* @return boolean.
*/
private boolean isDistanceOne(char[] otherWord)
int count = 0;
for(int i = 0; i < otherWord.length; i++)
if (this.word[i] != otherWord[i])
count++;
return (count == 1);
java performance strings array edit-distance
java performance strings array edit-distance
edited May 12 at 18:21
200_success
132k20160427
132k20160427
asked May 12 at 17:50
LuminousNutriaLuminousNutria
23416
23416
1
$begingroup$
How large are the Strings? The fastest solution would differ for many short Strings versus very large strings
$endgroup$
– dustytrash
May 12 at 17:52
$begingroup$
@dustytrash The range is from 1 to 24. The average length is 9. I've edited my question to mention this.
$endgroup$
– LuminousNutria
May 12 at 18:04
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
How large are the Strings? The fastest solution would differ for many short Strings versus very large strings
$endgroup$
– dustytrash
May 12 at 17:52
$begingroup$
@dustytrash The range is from 1 to 24. The average length is 9. I've edited my question to mention this.
$endgroup$
– LuminousNutria
May 12 at 18:04
1
1
$begingroup$
How large are the Strings? The fastest solution would differ for many short Strings versus very large strings
$endgroup$
– dustytrash
May 12 at 17:52
$begingroup$
How large are the Strings? The fastest solution would differ for many short Strings versus very large strings
$endgroup$
– dustytrash
May 12 at 17:52
$begingroup$
@dustytrash The range is from 1 to 24. The average length is 9. I've edited my question to mention this.
$endgroup$
– LuminousNutria
May 12 at 18:04
$begingroup$
@dustytrash The range is from 1 to 24. The average length is 9. I've edited my question to mention this.
$endgroup$
– LuminousNutria
May 12 at 18:04
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Given the limited context, and no information about where the hotspot is in the code, it's difficult to give concrete advice. Here are some musings for your consideration:
For ease of reading, it's preferable to have whitespace after control flow keywords and before the (
.
It is suggested to always include curly braces, even when they're not required by the compiler.
Use final
where possible to reduce cognitive load on the readers of your code.
word
should be private.
There's no apparent reason to use char[]
instead of just keeping a pointer to the original String
. They're costing you time and space to make, to no benefit.
You can short-circuit out of your for
loop if the count ever becomes greater than one. Unless a significant fraction of your inputs have a distance of one, you should see some performance gain here.
Using a boolean
instead of an int
might make a very small difference in execution time, but that would need to be tested. It also makes the code harder to read.
private class WordArray
private final String word;
private WordArray(final String word)
this.word = word;
private boolean isDistanceOne(final char[] otherWord)
assert word.length() == otherWord.length;
int distance = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < otherWord.length; i++)
if (this.word.charAt(i) == otherWord[i])
continue;
if (distance > 0)
return false;
distance++;
return distance == 1;
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I don't think you can beat that linear complexity since you need to look at each character to determine the Hamming distance.
One small optimization you can do is to short-circuit once your count goes above one, but that adds an extra check in every iteration, so it might have worse runtime depending on the inputs.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "196"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f220144%2ffind-hamming-distance-between-two-strings-of-equal-length-in-java%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Given the limited context, and no information about where the hotspot is in the code, it's difficult to give concrete advice. Here are some musings for your consideration:
For ease of reading, it's preferable to have whitespace after control flow keywords and before the (
.
It is suggested to always include curly braces, even when they're not required by the compiler.
Use final
where possible to reduce cognitive load on the readers of your code.
word
should be private.
There's no apparent reason to use char[]
instead of just keeping a pointer to the original String
. They're costing you time and space to make, to no benefit.
You can short-circuit out of your for
loop if the count ever becomes greater than one. Unless a significant fraction of your inputs have a distance of one, you should see some performance gain here.
Using a boolean
instead of an int
might make a very small difference in execution time, but that would need to be tested. It also makes the code harder to read.
private class WordArray
private final String word;
private WordArray(final String word)
this.word = word;
private boolean isDistanceOne(final char[] otherWord)
assert word.length() == otherWord.length;
int distance = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < otherWord.length; i++)
if (this.word.charAt(i) == otherWord[i])
continue;
if (distance > 0)
return false;
distance++;
return distance == 1;
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Given the limited context, and no information about where the hotspot is in the code, it's difficult to give concrete advice. Here are some musings for your consideration:
For ease of reading, it's preferable to have whitespace after control flow keywords and before the (
.
It is suggested to always include curly braces, even when they're not required by the compiler.
Use final
where possible to reduce cognitive load on the readers of your code.
word
should be private.
There's no apparent reason to use char[]
instead of just keeping a pointer to the original String
. They're costing you time and space to make, to no benefit.
You can short-circuit out of your for
loop if the count ever becomes greater than one. Unless a significant fraction of your inputs have a distance of one, you should see some performance gain here.
Using a boolean
instead of an int
might make a very small difference in execution time, but that would need to be tested. It also makes the code harder to read.
private class WordArray
private final String word;
private WordArray(final String word)
this.word = word;
private boolean isDistanceOne(final char[] otherWord)
assert word.length() == otherWord.length;
int distance = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < otherWord.length; i++)
if (this.word.charAt(i) == otherWord[i])
continue;
if (distance > 0)
return false;
distance++;
return distance == 1;
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Given the limited context, and no information about where the hotspot is in the code, it's difficult to give concrete advice. Here are some musings for your consideration:
For ease of reading, it's preferable to have whitespace after control flow keywords and before the (
.
It is suggested to always include curly braces, even when they're not required by the compiler.
Use final
where possible to reduce cognitive load on the readers of your code.
word
should be private.
There's no apparent reason to use char[]
instead of just keeping a pointer to the original String
. They're costing you time and space to make, to no benefit.
You can short-circuit out of your for
loop if the count ever becomes greater than one. Unless a significant fraction of your inputs have a distance of one, you should see some performance gain here.
Using a boolean
instead of an int
might make a very small difference in execution time, but that would need to be tested. It also makes the code harder to read.
private class WordArray
private final String word;
private WordArray(final String word)
this.word = word;
private boolean isDistanceOne(final char[] otherWord)
assert word.length() == otherWord.length;
int distance = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < otherWord.length; i++)
if (this.word.charAt(i) == otherWord[i])
continue;
if (distance > 0)
return false;
distance++;
return distance == 1;
$endgroup$
Given the limited context, and no information about where the hotspot is in the code, it's difficult to give concrete advice. Here are some musings for your consideration:
For ease of reading, it's preferable to have whitespace after control flow keywords and before the (
.
It is suggested to always include curly braces, even when they're not required by the compiler.
Use final
where possible to reduce cognitive load on the readers of your code.
word
should be private.
There's no apparent reason to use char[]
instead of just keeping a pointer to the original String
. They're costing you time and space to make, to no benefit.
You can short-circuit out of your for
loop if the count ever becomes greater than one. Unless a significant fraction of your inputs have a distance of one, you should see some performance gain here.
Using a boolean
instead of an int
might make a very small difference in execution time, but that would need to be tested. It also makes the code harder to read.
private class WordArray
private final String word;
private WordArray(final String word)
this.word = word;
private boolean isDistanceOne(final char[] otherWord)
assert word.length() == otherWord.length;
int distance = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < otherWord.length; i++)
if (this.word.charAt(i) == otherWord[i])
continue;
if (distance > 0)
return false;
distance++;
return distance == 1;
answered May 12 at 20:15
Eric SteinEric Stein
4,465613
4,465613
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I don't think you can beat that linear complexity since you need to look at each character to determine the Hamming distance.
One small optimization you can do is to short-circuit once your count goes above one, but that adds an extra check in every iteration, so it might have worse runtime depending on the inputs.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I don't think you can beat that linear complexity since you need to look at each character to determine the Hamming distance.
One small optimization you can do is to short-circuit once your count goes above one, but that adds an extra check in every iteration, so it might have worse runtime depending on the inputs.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I don't think you can beat that linear complexity since you need to look at each character to determine the Hamming distance.
One small optimization you can do is to short-circuit once your count goes above one, but that adds an extra check in every iteration, so it might have worse runtime depending on the inputs.
$endgroup$
I don't think you can beat that linear complexity since you need to look at each character to determine the Hamming distance.
One small optimization you can do is to short-circuit once your count goes above one, but that adds an extra check in every iteration, so it might have worse runtime depending on the inputs.
answered May 12 at 20:10
Hesham AttiaHesham Attia
79829
79829
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f220144%2ffind-hamming-distance-between-two-strings-of-equal-length-in-java%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
How large are the Strings? The fastest solution would differ for many short Strings versus very large strings
$endgroup$
– dustytrash
May 12 at 17:52
$begingroup$
@dustytrash The range is from 1 to 24. The average length is 9. I've edited my question to mention this.
$endgroup$
– LuminousNutria
May 12 at 18:04