Why is LOX on top in the Space Shuttle external tank instead of the other the way round? [duplicate]Why was the Shuttle's LOX tank on top of the LH2 tank, since that makes it more top-heavy?Why does a rocket engine provide more thrust in a vacuum than in atmosphere?Why was the Shuttle's LOX tank on top of the LH2 tank, since that makes it more top-heavy?Why wasn't the space shuttle fully Liquid fueled?Why did the External Tank not have its own engines?Combination of liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygenWhy spray LOx into combustion chamber, if GOx is more effective?Why didn't the space shuttle use non-foam-shedding external tanks?Why does the Falcon 9 use RP-1/LOx and not LH2/LOx?How big of an external tank to replace the shuttle SRBs with more LH2 and LO2?Cheapest rocket to go to space?
Website returning plaintext password
What is Theresa May waiting for?
How strong are Wi-Fi signals?
Gladys goes shopping
C++ forcing function parameter evalution order
Teacher help me explain this to my students
number headings
Does Nitrogen inside commercial airliner wheels prevent blowouts on touchdown?
Is it possible to remotely hack the GPS system and disable GPS service worldwide?
Can I tell a prospective employee that everyone in the team is leaving?
How to respond to an upset student?
Can a person survive on blood in place of water?
Is the taxi route omitted in low visibility (LVP)?
Is the field of q-series 'dead'?
Did people Unsnap to where they were?
Count Even Digits In Number
Is DateWithin30Days(Date 1, Date 2) an Apex Method?
What was the idiom for something that we take without a doubt?
Why does this if-statement combining assignment and an equality check return true?
How did these characters "suit up" so quickly?
Boss wants me to falsify a report. How should I document this unethical demand?
Count rotary dial pulses in a phone number (including letters)
Grammar Question Regarding "Are the" or "Is the" When Referring to Something that May or May not be Plural
Externally monitoring CPU/SSD activity without software access
Why is LOX on top in the Space Shuttle external tank instead of the other the way round? [duplicate]
Why was the Shuttle's LOX tank on top of the LH2 tank, since that makes it more top-heavy?Why does a rocket engine provide more thrust in a vacuum than in atmosphere?Why was the Shuttle's LOX tank on top of the LH2 tank, since that makes it more top-heavy?Why wasn't the space shuttle fully Liquid fueled?Why did the External Tank not have its own engines?Combination of liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygenWhy spray LOx into combustion chamber, if GOx is more effective?Why didn't the space shuttle use non-foam-shedding external tanks?Why does the Falcon 9 use RP-1/LOx and not LH2/LOx?How big of an external tank to replace the shuttle SRBs with more LH2 and LO2?Cheapest rocket to go to space?
$begingroup$
This question already has an answer here:
Why was the Shuttle's LOX tank on top of the LH2 tank, since that makes it more top-heavy?
2 answers
Why is oxygen placed on top of hydrogen? Does this have anything to do with letting the warmer and not the colder liquid have a non-spherical bulkhead and thus more surface area to reduce boil-off?
rockets space-shuttle fuel
$endgroup$
marked as duplicate by Russell Borogove, Community♦ May 13 at 2:24
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This question already has an answer here:
Why was the Shuttle's LOX tank on top of the LH2 tank, since that makes it more top-heavy?
2 answers
Why is oxygen placed on top of hydrogen? Does this have anything to do with letting the warmer and not the colder liquid have a non-spherical bulkhead and thus more surface area to reduce boil-off?
rockets space-shuttle fuel
$endgroup$
marked as duplicate by Russell Borogove, Community♦ May 13 at 2:24
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This question already has an answer here:
Why was the Shuttle's LOX tank on top of the LH2 tank, since that makes it more top-heavy?
2 answers
Why is oxygen placed on top of hydrogen? Does this have anything to do with letting the warmer and not the colder liquid have a non-spherical bulkhead and thus more surface area to reduce boil-off?
rockets space-shuttle fuel
$endgroup$
This question already has an answer here:
Why was the Shuttle's LOX tank on top of the LH2 tank, since that makes it more top-heavy?
2 answers
Why is oxygen placed on top of hydrogen? Does this have anything to do with letting the warmer and not the colder liquid have a non-spherical bulkhead and thus more surface area to reduce boil-off?
This question already has an answer here:
Why was the Shuttle's LOX tank on top of the LH2 tank, since that makes it more top-heavy?
2 answers
rockets space-shuttle fuel
rockets space-shuttle fuel
edited May 13 at 0:10
Organic Marble
64.2k4178273
64.2k4178273
asked May 12 at 23:14
Meatball PrincessMeatball Princess
3077
3077
marked as duplicate by Russell Borogove, Community♦ May 13 at 2:24
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
marked as duplicate by Russell Borogove, Community♦ May 13 at 2:24
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Having the colder tank lower in the stack is marginally helpful for the thermal design, but in the case of the space shuttle, aerodynamic considerations dominate.
For aerodynamic stability, it's desirable to put the center of gravity well forward of the center of aerodynamic pressure (which means roughly "where the drag is happening"). Think about a throwing dart, with its heavy forward end and draggy fins at the back; the drag force on the fins keeps it from tumbling.
The wings of the space shuttle orbiter are a big source of drag, so the center of gravity needs to be forward of that. Liquid oxygen is about 16 times as dense as liquid hydrogen, so forward it goes, to move the overall CG forward of the wings.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
It also reduces the range that the engines have to gimbal
$endgroup$
– Hans
May 13 at 13:52
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Having the colder tank lower in the stack is marginally helpful for the thermal design, but in the case of the space shuttle, aerodynamic considerations dominate.
For aerodynamic stability, it's desirable to put the center of gravity well forward of the center of aerodynamic pressure (which means roughly "where the drag is happening"). Think about a throwing dart, with its heavy forward end and draggy fins at the back; the drag force on the fins keeps it from tumbling.
The wings of the space shuttle orbiter are a big source of drag, so the center of gravity needs to be forward of that. Liquid oxygen is about 16 times as dense as liquid hydrogen, so forward it goes, to move the overall CG forward of the wings.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
It also reduces the range that the engines have to gimbal
$endgroup$
– Hans
May 13 at 13:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Having the colder tank lower in the stack is marginally helpful for the thermal design, but in the case of the space shuttle, aerodynamic considerations dominate.
For aerodynamic stability, it's desirable to put the center of gravity well forward of the center of aerodynamic pressure (which means roughly "where the drag is happening"). Think about a throwing dart, with its heavy forward end and draggy fins at the back; the drag force on the fins keeps it from tumbling.
The wings of the space shuttle orbiter are a big source of drag, so the center of gravity needs to be forward of that. Liquid oxygen is about 16 times as dense as liquid hydrogen, so forward it goes, to move the overall CG forward of the wings.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
It also reduces the range that the engines have to gimbal
$endgroup$
– Hans
May 13 at 13:52
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Having the colder tank lower in the stack is marginally helpful for the thermal design, but in the case of the space shuttle, aerodynamic considerations dominate.
For aerodynamic stability, it's desirable to put the center of gravity well forward of the center of aerodynamic pressure (which means roughly "where the drag is happening"). Think about a throwing dart, with its heavy forward end and draggy fins at the back; the drag force on the fins keeps it from tumbling.
The wings of the space shuttle orbiter are a big source of drag, so the center of gravity needs to be forward of that. Liquid oxygen is about 16 times as dense as liquid hydrogen, so forward it goes, to move the overall CG forward of the wings.
$endgroup$
Having the colder tank lower in the stack is marginally helpful for the thermal design, but in the case of the space shuttle, aerodynamic considerations dominate.
For aerodynamic stability, it's desirable to put the center of gravity well forward of the center of aerodynamic pressure (which means roughly "where the drag is happening"). Think about a throwing dart, with its heavy forward end and draggy fins at the back; the drag force on the fins keeps it from tumbling.
The wings of the space shuttle orbiter are a big source of drag, so the center of gravity needs to be forward of that. Liquid oxygen is about 16 times as dense as liquid hydrogen, so forward it goes, to move the overall CG forward of the wings.
answered May 12 at 23:46
Russell BorogoveRussell Borogove
92.4k3311396
92.4k3311396
1
$begingroup$
It also reduces the range that the engines have to gimbal
$endgroup$
– Hans
May 13 at 13:52
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
It also reduces the range that the engines have to gimbal
$endgroup$
– Hans
May 13 at 13:52
1
1
$begingroup$
It also reduces the range that the engines have to gimbal
$endgroup$
– Hans
May 13 at 13:52
$begingroup$
It also reduces the range that the engines have to gimbal
$endgroup$
– Hans
May 13 at 13:52
add a comment |