Wireless headphones interfere with Wi-Fi signal on laptopWireless Signal StrengthInternet speeds significantly slower on wireless connection versus wired connection with D-Link DIR-655 RouterHow do I troubleshoot low wireless signal strength on my Dell Studio XPS?Wireless Router - Losing Connection, Very Low Speeds - Cause?? Test ResultsSpeed Test Changes for Wireless, but not for WiredStrong wireless signal yet apparently randomly no internet connection. Other devices work through wirelessBluetooth headphones stuttering and media controls not working Windows 10Bluetooth Audio issue with new Beats Wireless Studio 3 headphonesWindows 10 says bluetooth headphones are connected but also not connectedWindows: Wireless/bluetooth headphones disconnect and then reconnect without sound if pc stops playing sound

Sitecore 9.0 works with solr 7.2.1?

I unknowingly submitted plagarised work

Looking for a soft substance that doesn't dissolve underwater

Apache redirect to https:/www only partially working

Have 1.5% of all nuclear reactors ever built melted down?

A Riley Respite

Is it possible to remotely hack the GPS system and disable GPS service worldwide?

Why didn't Thanos use the Time Stone to stop the Avengers' plan?

How to know if a folder is a symbolic link?

How to patch glass cuts in a bicycle tire?

What to do when you've set the wrong ISO for your film?

Can I tell a prospective employee that everyone in the team is leaving?

number headings

Should one buy new hardware after a system compromise?

How strong are Wi-Fi signals?

Why aren't space telescopes put in GEO?

Python program to take in two strings and print the larger string

I know that there is a preselected candidate for a position to be filled at my department. What should I do?

Make 24 using exactly three 3s

What to keep in mind when telling an aunt how wrong her actions are, without creating further family conflict?

A steel cutting sword?

C++ forcing function parameter evalution order

Is DateWithin30Days(Date 1, Date 2) an Apex Method?

Need to understand my home electrical meter to see why bill is so high and/or if neighbor is on same meter



Wireless headphones interfere with Wi-Fi signal on laptop


Wireless Signal StrengthInternet speeds significantly slower on wireless connection versus wired connection with D-Link DIR-655 RouterHow do I troubleshoot low wireless signal strength on my Dell Studio XPS?Wireless Router - Losing Connection, Very Low Speeds - Cause?? Test ResultsSpeed Test Changes for Wireless, but not for WiredStrong wireless signal yet apparently randomly no internet connection. Other devices work through wirelessBluetooth headphones stuttering and media controls not working Windows 10Bluetooth Audio issue with new Beats Wireless Studio 3 headphonesWindows 10 says bluetooth headphones are connected but also not connectedWindows: Wireless/bluetooth headphones disconnect and then reconnect without sound if pc stops playing sound






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








33















I have Medion MD 84299 wireless (not Bluetooth) headphones and they work totally fine.



The problem is that once I turn on the headphone’s base station, Wi-Fi signal on my laptop becomes poor and download speed goes from 70 mbps to 2 mbps.



Is there a way to fix this?










share|improve this question






























    33















    I have Medion MD 84299 wireless (not Bluetooth) headphones and they work totally fine.



    The problem is that once I turn on the headphone’s base station, Wi-Fi signal on my laptop becomes poor and download speed goes from 70 mbps to 2 mbps.



    Is there a way to fix this?










    share|improve this question


























      33












      33








      33


      3






      I have Medion MD 84299 wireless (not Bluetooth) headphones and they work totally fine.



      The problem is that once I turn on the headphone’s base station, Wi-Fi signal on my laptop becomes poor and download speed goes from 70 mbps to 2 mbps.



      Is there a way to fix this?










      share|improve this question
















      I have Medion MD 84299 wireless (not Bluetooth) headphones and they work totally fine.



      The problem is that once I turn on the headphone’s base station, Wi-Fi signal on my laptop becomes poor and download speed goes from 70 mbps to 2 mbps.



      Is there a way to fix this?







      windows-10 wireless-networking network-interface wireless-headset






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited May 14 at 9:50







      niksrb

















      asked May 12 at 22:17









      niksrbniksrb

      1981310




      1981310




















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          69














          The wireless headphones are working in the same frequency as Wi-Fi, 2.4Ghz, according to the official Medion MD 84299 user manual (PDF).



          If your WiFi supports 5GHz use it. That is almost always the best solution. If not, try a different channel for WiFi -> 1, 6 and 11 are preferable.



          Also try to keep the headphones' base station as far as possible from the WiFi antennae.






          share|improve this answer




















          • 4





            You can also switch to another headphone connectivity technology, such as Bluetooth, Wire, Infrared, FM, AM, GSM etc

            – Aron
            May 14 at 3:04











          • But those headphones does not support Bluetooth connection, or am I wrong? Wire would be the only option, but I bought them to use them while moving around house :D

            – niksrb
            May 14 at 9:26






          • 1





            Bluetooth also uses 2.4 GHz (although it perhaps cooperates better with Wi-Fi than other protocols do)... GSM only carries ~32 kbps speech. Infrared? Come on. Maybe if you meant infrared over fiber optic cable...

            – grawity
            May 14 at 9:33












          • @niksrb No, they don't. The comment above suggests another headphone. Bluetooth ones are very reliable and have better range than this "old technology".

            – GabrielaGarcia
            May 14 at 9:34






          • 1





            @grawity GSM is of course a semi-joke (the OP never states the intended purpose of the headphones). Infrared headphones are not only entirely possible, but are a thing. It is possible that the OP's headphones are simply using FM modulated 2.4GHz. If so it would explain why it broadcasts wide spectrum "noise".

            – Aron
            May 15 at 4:05


















          13














          GabrielaGarcia has a very good answer already, but I'll expand a bit on it.



          If you still got the receipt on those headphones, I'd consider returning them. They come from an era where not everybody was using Wi-Fi at home and everything using a radio went to 2.4 GHz because it's an ISM band. Which was a world of fun with older microwave ovens... Anyway, Wi-Fi was a simple enough protocol so a lot of electronics that needed a bit of bandwith ended up using some version of it. Not necessarily exactly to spec, but it didn't have to as long as it stayed within the 2.4 GHz ISM and could communicate well enough with whatever it had to (your base station to your headphones and vice versa). Which wasn't a big deal until everybody started using Wi-Fi, especially at higher speeds.



          While Bluetooth and plenty of other technologies are also on that band, they use different methods to communicate. For example, Bluetooth uses a method of adaptive frequency hopping that's so fast (and the sub-bands it uses so narrow) that it's a lot harder to disrupt. It's also slower, yes, but still plenty fast for high-quality audio over headphones. And it doesn't disrupt your Wi-Fi as much, since it's less likely to be using exactly the same frequency as your router. The manual doesn't seem to indicate which exact Wi-Fi band it uses, so it might be hopping all over the place trying to find the best slot just as your router is doing the same. Who knows.






          share|improve this answer


















          • 1





            I bought them from a guy who has already used them, for just 5 dollars. Returning is not an option, but I do not regret it, will use them from time to time and instead using them with Laptop, will put them next to my desktop PC and then everything will be fine I guess. My router is in another room anyways and desktop is connected via cable. They could be used even when you are 40 meter far from base so it's great to use them while doing something in the yard, or around a car, I don't need to bring my phone with me and look out all the time if I am going to drop it.

            – niksrb
            May 14 at 9:33



















          2














          There's a chance that your wireless headphones use a lot more RF power than they really need.



          Try covering some of the base station with aluminium foil - that'll block part of the signal it emits. Chances are that the headphones will still have a decent range, while the WiFi signal won't suffer as much.






          share|improve this answer






























            1














            I would first start with looking at your frequency use. If you have a android phone there are many free WiFi viewing apps (I run 4 different ones because each looks at different things). Get near your headphone base and see the frequency band it is running on. I would expect that it defaults to 1, 6, or 11. I would then guess that your WiFi is on the same channel right now.



            Once you have this knowledge you can enact the advice already given by GabrielaGarcia. Change to a 5 GHz channel (or get a new router with both 2.4GHz and 5 GHz channels), or if you must stay at 2.4 GHz set you router to the channel furthest away from the channel your headphone base. Also separation of the two radio sources is beneficial, but will not help when you are much closer to the headphone base station.



            Last, you may have your router running on a lower power setting. If so you can set it to broadcast at it highest setting (usually 100 mW at 2.4 GHz). This may also be a setting on your laptop, but turning it up will drain the battery faster.



            I would recommend use of the 5 GHz band if possible as it will give you the best possible speed but it does require your laptop to have a 5 GHz receiver and older laptops do not.






            share|improve this answer


















            • 12





              Wifi apps and 'wifi bandwith usage' detectors usually cannot detect devices that opperate on 2.4GHz but are not communicating via a WIFI protocol. It is a hardware limitation; the Wifi modem can only demodulate wifi; everything else is 'packet loss' or 'data corruption'. Some modems have an alternate mode for measuring actual band occupancy and noise, but most commonly this type of analysis is reserved for expensive diagnostic tools.

              – Andy
              May 13 at 6:32







            • 2





              In addition to what Andy said, the specific concept of channels is not universal among everything using 2.4 GHz. Different products/protocols use different bandwidth and numbering schemes. (Remember those cheap X10 wireless security cameras? They wipe out the whole band!)

              – Brad
              May 14 at 5:34











            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "3"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1435985%2fwireless-headphones-interfere-with-wi-fi-signal-on-laptop%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            4 Answers
            4






            active

            oldest

            votes








            4 Answers
            4






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            69














            The wireless headphones are working in the same frequency as Wi-Fi, 2.4Ghz, according to the official Medion MD 84299 user manual (PDF).



            If your WiFi supports 5GHz use it. That is almost always the best solution. If not, try a different channel for WiFi -> 1, 6 and 11 are preferable.



            Also try to keep the headphones' base station as far as possible from the WiFi antennae.






            share|improve this answer




















            • 4





              You can also switch to another headphone connectivity technology, such as Bluetooth, Wire, Infrared, FM, AM, GSM etc

              – Aron
              May 14 at 3:04











            • But those headphones does not support Bluetooth connection, or am I wrong? Wire would be the only option, but I bought them to use them while moving around house :D

              – niksrb
              May 14 at 9:26






            • 1





              Bluetooth also uses 2.4 GHz (although it perhaps cooperates better with Wi-Fi than other protocols do)... GSM only carries ~32 kbps speech. Infrared? Come on. Maybe if you meant infrared over fiber optic cable...

              – grawity
              May 14 at 9:33












            • @niksrb No, they don't. The comment above suggests another headphone. Bluetooth ones are very reliable and have better range than this "old technology".

              – GabrielaGarcia
              May 14 at 9:34






            • 1





              @grawity GSM is of course a semi-joke (the OP never states the intended purpose of the headphones). Infrared headphones are not only entirely possible, but are a thing. It is possible that the OP's headphones are simply using FM modulated 2.4GHz. If so it would explain why it broadcasts wide spectrum "noise".

              – Aron
              May 15 at 4:05















            69














            The wireless headphones are working in the same frequency as Wi-Fi, 2.4Ghz, according to the official Medion MD 84299 user manual (PDF).



            If your WiFi supports 5GHz use it. That is almost always the best solution. If not, try a different channel for WiFi -> 1, 6 and 11 are preferable.



            Also try to keep the headphones' base station as far as possible from the WiFi antennae.






            share|improve this answer




















            • 4





              You can also switch to another headphone connectivity technology, such as Bluetooth, Wire, Infrared, FM, AM, GSM etc

              – Aron
              May 14 at 3:04











            • But those headphones does not support Bluetooth connection, or am I wrong? Wire would be the only option, but I bought them to use them while moving around house :D

              – niksrb
              May 14 at 9:26






            • 1





              Bluetooth also uses 2.4 GHz (although it perhaps cooperates better with Wi-Fi than other protocols do)... GSM only carries ~32 kbps speech. Infrared? Come on. Maybe if you meant infrared over fiber optic cable...

              – grawity
              May 14 at 9:33












            • @niksrb No, they don't. The comment above suggests another headphone. Bluetooth ones are very reliable and have better range than this "old technology".

              – GabrielaGarcia
              May 14 at 9:34






            • 1





              @grawity GSM is of course a semi-joke (the OP never states the intended purpose of the headphones). Infrared headphones are not only entirely possible, but are a thing. It is possible that the OP's headphones are simply using FM modulated 2.4GHz. If so it would explain why it broadcasts wide spectrum "noise".

              – Aron
              May 15 at 4:05













            69












            69








            69







            The wireless headphones are working in the same frequency as Wi-Fi, 2.4Ghz, according to the official Medion MD 84299 user manual (PDF).



            If your WiFi supports 5GHz use it. That is almost always the best solution. If not, try a different channel for WiFi -> 1, 6 and 11 are preferable.



            Also try to keep the headphones' base station as far as possible from the WiFi antennae.






            share|improve this answer















            The wireless headphones are working in the same frequency as Wi-Fi, 2.4Ghz, according to the official Medion MD 84299 user manual (PDF).



            If your WiFi supports 5GHz use it. That is almost always the best solution. If not, try a different channel for WiFi -> 1, 6 and 11 are preferable.



            Also try to keep the headphones' base station as far as possible from the WiFi antennae.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited May 12 at 23:27









            JakeGould

            33.5k10101145




            33.5k10101145










            answered May 12 at 23:07









            GabrielaGarciaGabrielaGarcia

            1,2981718




            1,2981718







            • 4





              You can also switch to another headphone connectivity technology, such as Bluetooth, Wire, Infrared, FM, AM, GSM etc

              – Aron
              May 14 at 3:04











            • But those headphones does not support Bluetooth connection, or am I wrong? Wire would be the only option, but I bought them to use them while moving around house :D

              – niksrb
              May 14 at 9:26






            • 1





              Bluetooth also uses 2.4 GHz (although it perhaps cooperates better with Wi-Fi than other protocols do)... GSM only carries ~32 kbps speech. Infrared? Come on. Maybe if you meant infrared over fiber optic cable...

              – grawity
              May 14 at 9:33












            • @niksrb No, they don't. The comment above suggests another headphone. Bluetooth ones are very reliable and have better range than this "old technology".

              – GabrielaGarcia
              May 14 at 9:34






            • 1





              @grawity GSM is of course a semi-joke (the OP never states the intended purpose of the headphones). Infrared headphones are not only entirely possible, but are a thing. It is possible that the OP's headphones are simply using FM modulated 2.4GHz. If so it would explain why it broadcasts wide spectrum "noise".

              – Aron
              May 15 at 4:05












            • 4





              You can also switch to another headphone connectivity technology, such as Bluetooth, Wire, Infrared, FM, AM, GSM etc

              – Aron
              May 14 at 3:04











            • But those headphones does not support Bluetooth connection, or am I wrong? Wire would be the only option, but I bought them to use them while moving around house :D

              – niksrb
              May 14 at 9:26






            • 1





              Bluetooth also uses 2.4 GHz (although it perhaps cooperates better with Wi-Fi than other protocols do)... GSM only carries ~32 kbps speech. Infrared? Come on. Maybe if you meant infrared over fiber optic cable...

              – grawity
              May 14 at 9:33












            • @niksrb No, they don't. The comment above suggests another headphone. Bluetooth ones are very reliable and have better range than this "old technology".

              – GabrielaGarcia
              May 14 at 9:34






            • 1





              @grawity GSM is of course a semi-joke (the OP never states the intended purpose of the headphones). Infrared headphones are not only entirely possible, but are a thing. It is possible that the OP's headphones are simply using FM modulated 2.4GHz. If so it would explain why it broadcasts wide spectrum "noise".

              – Aron
              May 15 at 4:05







            4




            4





            You can also switch to another headphone connectivity technology, such as Bluetooth, Wire, Infrared, FM, AM, GSM etc

            – Aron
            May 14 at 3:04





            You can also switch to another headphone connectivity technology, such as Bluetooth, Wire, Infrared, FM, AM, GSM etc

            – Aron
            May 14 at 3:04













            But those headphones does not support Bluetooth connection, or am I wrong? Wire would be the only option, but I bought them to use them while moving around house :D

            – niksrb
            May 14 at 9:26





            But those headphones does not support Bluetooth connection, or am I wrong? Wire would be the only option, but I bought them to use them while moving around house :D

            – niksrb
            May 14 at 9:26




            1




            1





            Bluetooth also uses 2.4 GHz (although it perhaps cooperates better with Wi-Fi than other protocols do)... GSM only carries ~32 kbps speech. Infrared? Come on. Maybe if you meant infrared over fiber optic cable...

            – grawity
            May 14 at 9:33






            Bluetooth also uses 2.4 GHz (although it perhaps cooperates better with Wi-Fi than other protocols do)... GSM only carries ~32 kbps speech. Infrared? Come on. Maybe if you meant infrared over fiber optic cable...

            – grawity
            May 14 at 9:33














            @niksrb No, they don't. The comment above suggests another headphone. Bluetooth ones are very reliable and have better range than this "old technology".

            – GabrielaGarcia
            May 14 at 9:34





            @niksrb No, they don't. The comment above suggests another headphone. Bluetooth ones are very reliable and have better range than this "old technology".

            – GabrielaGarcia
            May 14 at 9:34




            1




            1





            @grawity GSM is of course a semi-joke (the OP never states the intended purpose of the headphones). Infrared headphones are not only entirely possible, but are a thing. It is possible that the OP's headphones are simply using FM modulated 2.4GHz. If so it would explain why it broadcasts wide spectrum "noise".

            – Aron
            May 15 at 4:05





            @grawity GSM is of course a semi-joke (the OP never states the intended purpose of the headphones). Infrared headphones are not only entirely possible, but are a thing. It is possible that the OP's headphones are simply using FM modulated 2.4GHz. If so it would explain why it broadcasts wide spectrum "noise".

            – Aron
            May 15 at 4:05













            13














            GabrielaGarcia has a very good answer already, but I'll expand a bit on it.



            If you still got the receipt on those headphones, I'd consider returning them. They come from an era where not everybody was using Wi-Fi at home and everything using a radio went to 2.4 GHz because it's an ISM band. Which was a world of fun with older microwave ovens... Anyway, Wi-Fi was a simple enough protocol so a lot of electronics that needed a bit of bandwith ended up using some version of it. Not necessarily exactly to spec, but it didn't have to as long as it stayed within the 2.4 GHz ISM and could communicate well enough with whatever it had to (your base station to your headphones and vice versa). Which wasn't a big deal until everybody started using Wi-Fi, especially at higher speeds.



            While Bluetooth and plenty of other technologies are also on that band, they use different methods to communicate. For example, Bluetooth uses a method of adaptive frequency hopping that's so fast (and the sub-bands it uses so narrow) that it's a lot harder to disrupt. It's also slower, yes, but still plenty fast for high-quality audio over headphones. And it doesn't disrupt your Wi-Fi as much, since it's less likely to be using exactly the same frequency as your router. The manual doesn't seem to indicate which exact Wi-Fi band it uses, so it might be hopping all over the place trying to find the best slot just as your router is doing the same. Who knows.






            share|improve this answer


















            • 1





              I bought them from a guy who has already used them, for just 5 dollars. Returning is not an option, but I do not regret it, will use them from time to time and instead using them with Laptop, will put them next to my desktop PC and then everything will be fine I guess. My router is in another room anyways and desktop is connected via cable. They could be used even when you are 40 meter far from base so it's great to use them while doing something in the yard, or around a car, I don't need to bring my phone with me and look out all the time if I am going to drop it.

              – niksrb
              May 14 at 9:33
















            13














            GabrielaGarcia has a very good answer already, but I'll expand a bit on it.



            If you still got the receipt on those headphones, I'd consider returning them. They come from an era where not everybody was using Wi-Fi at home and everything using a radio went to 2.4 GHz because it's an ISM band. Which was a world of fun with older microwave ovens... Anyway, Wi-Fi was a simple enough protocol so a lot of electronics that needed a bit of bandwith ended up using some version of it. Not necessarily exactly to spec, but it didn't have to as long as it stayed within the 2.4 GHz ISM and could communicate well enough with whatever it had to (your base station to your headphones and vice versa). Which wasn't a big deal until everybody started using Wi-Fi, especially at higher speeds.



            While Bluetooth and plenty of other technologies are also on that band, they use different methods to communicate. For example, Bluetooth uses a method of adaptive frequency hopping that's so fast (and the sub-bands it uses so narrow) that it's a lot harder to disrupt. It's also slower, yes, but still plenty fast for high-quality audio over headphones. And it doesn't disrupt your Wi-Fi as much, since it's less likely to be using exactly the same frequency as your router. The manual doesn't seem to indicate which exact Wi-Fi band it uses, so it might be hopping all over the place trying to find the best slot just as your router is doing the same. Who knows.






            share|improve this answer


















            • 1





              I bought them from a guy who has already used them, for just 5 dollars. Returning is not an option, but I do not regret it, will use them from time to time and instead using them with Laptop, will put them next to my desktop PC and then everything will be fine I guess. My router is in another room anyways and desktop is connected via cable. They could be used even when you are 40 meter far from base so it's great to use them while doing something in the yard, or around a car, I don't need to bring my phone with me and look out all the time if I am going to drop it.

              – niksrb
              May 14 at 9:33














            13












            13








            13







            GabrielaGarcia has a very good answer already, but I'll expand a bit on it.



            If you still got the receipt on those headphones, I'd consider returning them. They come from an era where not everybody was using Wi-Fi at home and everything using a radio went to 2.4 GHz because it's an ISM band. Which was a world of fun with older microwave ovens... Anyway, Wi-Fi was a simple enough protocol so a lot of electronics that needed a bit of bandwith ended up using some version of it. Not necessarily exactly to spec, but it didn't have to as long as it stayed within the 2.4 GHz ISM and could communicate well enough with whatever it had to (your base station to your headphones and vice versa). Which wasn't a big deal until everybody started using Wi-Fi, especially at higher speeds.



            While Bluetooth and plenty of other technologies are also on that band, they use different methods to communicate. For example, Bluetooth uses a method of adaptive frequency hopping that's so fast (and the sub-bands it uses so narrow) that it's a lot harder to disrupt. It's also slower, yes, but still plenty fast for high-quality audio over headphones. And it doesn't disrupt your Wi-Fi as much, since it's less likely to be using exactly the same frequency as your router. The manual doesn't seem to indicate which exact Wi-Fi band it uses, so it might be hopping all over the place trying to find the best slot just as your router is doing the same. Who knows.






            share|improve this answer













            GabrielaGarcia has a very good answer already, but I'll expand a bit on it.



            If you still got the receipt on those headphones, I'd consider returning them. They come from an era where not everybody was using Wi-Fi at home and everything using a radio went to 2.4 GHz because it's an ISM band. Which was a world of fun with older microwave ovens... Anyway, Wi-Fi was a simple enough protocol so a lot of electronics that needed a bit of bandwith ended up using some version of it. Not necessarily exactly to spec, but it didn't have to as long as it stayed within the 2.4 GHz ISM and could communicate well enough with whatever it had to (your base station to your headphones and vice versa). Which wasn't a big deal until everybody started using Wi-Fi, especially at higher speeds.



            While Bluetooth and plenty of other technologies are also on that band, they use different methods to communicate. For example, Bluetooth uses a method of adaptive frequency hopping that's so fast (and the sub-bands it uses so narrow) that it's a lot harder to disrupt. It's also slower, yes, but still plenty fast for high-quality audio over headphones. And it doesn't disrupt your Wi-Fi as much, since it's less likely to be using exactly the same frequency as your router. The manual doesn't seem to indicate which exact Wi-Fi band it uses, so it might be hopping all over the place trying to find the best slot just as your router is doing the same. Who knows.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered May 14 at 6:37









            MastMast

            2317




            2317







            • 1





              I bought them from a guy who has already used them, for just 5 dollars. Returning is not an option, but I do not regret it, will use them from time to time and instead using them with Laptop, will put them next to my desktop PC and then everything will be fine I guess. My router is in another room anyways and desktop is connected via cable. They could be used even when you are 40 meter far from base so it's great to use them while doing something in the yard, or around a car, I don't need to bring my phone with me and look out all the time if I am going to drop it.

              – niksrb
              May 14 at 9:33













            • 1





              I bought them from a guy who has already used them, for just 5 dollars. Returning is not an option, but I do not regret it, will use them from time to time and instead using them with Laptop, will put them next to my desktop PC and then everything will be fine I guess. My router is in another room anyways and desktop is connected via cable. They could be used even when you are 40 meter far from base so it's great to use them while doing something in the yard, or around a car, I don't need to bring my phone with me and look out all the time if I am going to drop it.

              – niksrb
              May 14 at 9:33








            1




            1





            I bought them from a guy who has already used them, for just 5 dollars. Returning is not an option, but I do not regret it, will use them from time to time and instead using them with Laptop, will put them next to my desktop PC and then everything will be fine I guess. My router is in another room anyways and desktop is connected via cable. They could be used even when you are 40 meter far from base so it's great to use them while doing something in the yard, or around a car, I don't need to bring my phone with me and look out all the time if I am going to drop it.

            – niksrb
            May 14 at 9:33






            I bought them from a guy who has already used them, for just 5 dollars. Returning is not an option, but I do not regret it, will use them from time to time and instead using them with Laptop, will put them next to my desktop PC and then everything will be fine I guess. My router is in another room anyways and desktop is connected via cable. They could be used even when you are 40 meter far from base so it's great to use them while doing something in the yard, or around a car, I don't need to bring my phone with me and look out all the time if I am going to drop it.

            – niksrb
            May 14 at 9:33












            2














            There's a chance that your wireless headphones use a lot more RF power than they really need.



            Try covering some of the base station with aluminium foil - that'll block part of the signal it emits. Chances are that the headphones will still have a decent range, while the WiFi signal won't suffer as much.






            share|improve this answer



























              2














              There's a chance that your wireless headphones use a lot more RF power than they really need.



              Try covering some of the base station with aluminium foil - that'll block part of the signal it emits. Chances are that the headphones will still have a decent range, while the WiFi signal won't suffer as much.






              share|improve this answer

























                2












                2








                2







                There's a chance that your wireless headphones use a lot more RF power than they really need.



                Try covering some of the base station with aluminium foil - that'll block part of the signal it emits. Chances are that the headphones will still have a decent range, while the WiFi signal won't suffer as much.






                share|improve this answer













                There's a chance that your wireless headphones use a lot more RF power than they really need.



                Try covering some of the base station with aluminium foil - that'll block part of the signal it emits. Chances are that the headphones will still have a decent range, while the WiFi signal won't suffer as much.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered May 14 at 8:55









                Dmitry GrigoryevDmitry Grigoryev

                6,42112360




                6,42112360





















                    1














                    I would first start with looking at your frequency use. If you have a android phone there are many free WiFi viewing apps (I run 4 different ones because each looks at different things). Get near your headphone base and see the frequency band it is running on. I would expect that it defaults to 1, 6, or 11. I would then guess that your WiFi is on the same channel right now.



                    Once you have this knowledge you can enact the advice already given by GabrielaGarcia. Change to a 5 GHz channel (or get a new router with both 2.4GHz and 5 GHz channels), or if you must stay at 2.4 GHz set you router to the channel furthest away from the channel your headphone base. Also separation of the two radio sources is beneficial, but will not help when you are much closer to the headphone base station.



                    Last, you may have your router running on a lower power setting. If so you can set it to broadcast at it highest setting (usually 100 mW at 2.4 GHz). This may also be a setting on your laptop, but turning it up will drain the battery faster.



                    I would recommend use of the 5 GHz band if possible as it will give you the best possible speed but it does require your laptop to have a 5 GHz receiver and older laptops do not.






                    share|improve this answer


















                    • 12





                      Wifi apps and 'wifi bandwith usage' detectors usually cannot detect devices that opperate on 2.4GHz but are not communicating via a WIFI protocol. It is a hardware limitation; the Wifi modem can only demodulate wifi; everything else is 'packet loss' or 'data corruption'. Some modems have an alternate mode for measuring actual band occupancy and noise, but most commonly this type of analysis is reserved for expensive diagnostic tools.

                      – Andy
                      May 13 at 6:32







                    • 2





                      In addition to what Andy said, the specific concept of channels is not universal among everything using 2.4 GHz. Different products/protocols use different bandwidth and numbering schemes. (Remember those cheap X10 wireless security cameras? They wipe out the whole band!)

                      – Brad
                      May 14 at 5:34















                    1














                    I would first start with looking at your frequency use. If you have a android phone there are many free WiFi viewing apps (I run 4 different ones because each looks at different things). Get near your headphone base and see the frequency band it is running on. I would expect that it defaults to 1, 6, or 11. I would then guess that your WiFi is on the same channel right now.



                    Once you have this knowledge you can enact the advice already given by GabrielaGarcia. Change to a 5 GHz channel (or get a new router with both 2.4GHz and 5 GHz channels), or if you must stay at 2.4 GHz set you router to the channel furthest away from the channel your headphone base. Also separation of the two radio sources is beneficial, but will not help when you are much closer to the headphone base station.



                    Last, you may have your router running on a lower power setting. If so you can set it to broadcast at it highest setting (usually 100 mW at 2.4 GHz). This may also be a setting on your laptop, but turning it up will drain the battery faster.



                    I would recommend use of the 5 GHz band if possible as it will give you the best possible speed but it does require your laptop to have a 5 GHz receiver and older laptops do not.






                    share|improve this answer


















                    • 12





                      Wifi apps and 'wifi bandwith usage' detectors usually cannot detect devices that opperate on 2.4GHz but are not communicating via a WIFI protocol. It is a hardware limitation; the Wifi modem can only demodulate wifi; everything else is 'packet loss' or 'data corruption'. Some modems have an alternate mode for measuring actual band occupancy and noise, but most commonly this type of analysis is reserved for expensive diagnostic tools.

                      – Andy
                      May 13 at 6:32







                    • 2





                      In addition to what Andy said, the specific concept of channels is not universal among everything using 2.4 GHz. Different products/protocols use different bandwidth and numbering schemes. (Remember those cheap X10 wireless security cameras? They wipe out the whole band!)

                      – Brad
                      May 14 at 5:34













                    1












                    1








                    1







                    I would first start with looking at your frequency use. If you have a android phone there are many free WiFi viewing apps (I run 4 different ones because each looks at different things). Get near your headphone base and see the frequency band it is running on. I would expect that it defaults to 1, 6, or 11. I would then guess that your WiFi is on the same channel right now.



                    Once you have this knowledge you can enact the advice already given by GabrielaGarcia. Change to a 5 GHz channel (or get a new router with both 2.4GHz and 5 GHz channels), or if you must stay at 2.4 GHz set you router to the channel furthest away from the channel your headphone base. Also separation of the two radio sources is beneficial, but will not help when you are much closer to the headphone base station.



                    Last, you may have your router running on a lower power setting. If so you can set it to broadcast at it highest setting (usually 100 mW at 2.4 GHz). This may also be a setting on your laptop, but turning it up will drain the battery faster.



                    I would recommend use of the 5 GHz band if possible as it will give you the best possible speed but it does require your laptop to have a 5 GHz receiver and older laptops do not.






                    share|improve this answer













                    I would first start with looking at your frequency use. If you have a android phone there are many free WiFi viewing apps (I run 4 different ones because each looks at different things). Get near your headphone base and see the frequency band it is running on. I would expect that it defaults to 1, 6, or 11. I would then guess that your WiFi is on the same channel right now.



                    Once you have this knowledge you can enact the advice already given by GabrielaGarcia. Change to a 5 GHz channel (or get a new router with both 2.4GHz and 5 GHz channels), or if you must stay at 2.4 GHz set you router to the channel furthest away from the channel your headphone base. Also separation of the two radio sources is beneficial, but will not help when you are much closer to the headphone base station.



                    Last, you may have your router running on a lower power setting. If so you can set it to broadcast at it highest setting (usually 100 mW at 2.4 GHz). This may also be a setting on your laptop, but turning it up will drain the battery faster.



                    I would recommend use of the 5 GHz band if possible as it will give you the best possible speed but it does require your laptop to have a 5 GHz receiver and older laptops do not.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered May 13 at 3:33









                    JamesJames

                    351




                    351







                    • 12





                      Wifi apps and 'wifi bandwith usage' detectors usually cannot detect devices that opperate on 2.4GHz but are not communicating via a WIFI protocol. It is a hardware limitation; the Wifi modem can only demodulate wifi; everything else is 'packet loss' or 'data corruption'. Some modems have an alternate mode for measuring actual band occupancy and noise, but most commonly this type of analysis is reserved for expensive diagnostic tools.

                      – Andy
                      May 13 at 6:32







                    • 2





                      In addition to what Andy said, the specific concept of channels is not universal among everything using 2.4 GHz. Different products/protocols use different bandwidth and numbering schemes. (Remember those cheap X10 wireless security cameras? They wipe out the whole band!)

                      – Brad
                      May 14 at 5:34












                    • 12





                      Wifi apps and 'wifi bandwith usage' detectors usually cannot detect devices that opperate on 2.4GHz but are not communicating via a WIFI protocol. It is a hardware limitation; the Wifi modem can only demodulate wifi; everything else is 'packet loss' or 'data corruption'. Some modems have an alternate mode for measuring actual band occupancy and noise, but most commonly this type of analysis is reserved for expensive diagnostic tools.

                      – Andy
                      May 13 at 6:32







                    • 2





                      In addition to what Andy said, the specific concept of channels is not universal among everything using 2.4 GHz. Different products/protocols use different bandwidth and numbering schemes. (Remember those cheap X10 wireless security cameras? They wipe out the whole band!)

                      – Brad
                      May 14 at 5:34







                    12




                    12





                    Wifi apps and 'wifi bandwith usage' detectors usually cannot detect devices that opperate on 2.4GHz but are not communicating via a WIFI protocol. It is a hardware limitation; the Wifi modem can only demodulate wifi; everything else is 'packet loss' or 'data corruption'. Some modems have an alternate mode for measuring actual band occupancy and noise, but most commonly this type of analysis is reserved for expensive diagnostic tools.

                    – Andy
                    May 13 at 6:32






                    Wifi apps and 'wifi bandwith usage' detectors usually cannot detect devices that opperate on 2.4GHz but are not communicating via a WIFI protocol. It is a hardware limitation; the Wifi modem can only demodulate wifi; everything else is 'packet loss' or 'data corruption'. Some modems have an alternate mode for measuring actual band occupancy and noise, but most commonly this type of analysis is reserved for expensive diagnostic tools.

                    – Andy
                    May 13 at 6:32





                    2




                    2





                    In addition to what Andy said, the specific concept of channels is not universal among everything using 2.4 GHz. Different products/protocols use different bandwidth and numbering schemes. (Remember those cheap X10 wireless security cameras? They wipe out the whole band!)

                    – Brad
                    May 14 at 5:34





                    In addition to what Andy said, the specific concept of channels is not universal among everything using 2.4 GHz. Different products/protocols use different bandwidth and numbering schemes. (Remember those cheap X10 wireless security cameras? They wipe out the whole band!)

                    – Brad
                    May 14 at 5:34

















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1435985%2fwireless-headphones-interfere-with-wi-fi-signal-on-laptop%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Club Baloncesto Breogán Índice Historia | Pavillón | Nome | O Breogán na cultura popular | Xogadores | Adestradores | Presidentes | Palmarés | Historial | Líderes | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióncbbreogan.galCadroGuía oficial da ACB 2009-10, páxina 201Guía oficial ACB 1992, páxina 183. Editorial DB.É de 6.500 espectadores sentados axeitándose á última normativa"Estudiantes Junior, entre as mellores canteiras"o orixinalHemeroteca El Mundo Deportivo, 16 setembro de 1970, páxina 12Historia do BreogánAlfredo Pérez, o último canoneiroHistoria C.B. BreogánHemeroteca de El Mundo DeportivoJimmy Wright, norteamericano do Breogán deixará Lugo por ameazas de morteResultados de Breogán en 1986-87Resultados de Breogán en 1990-91Ficha de Velimir Perasović en acb.comResultados de Breogán en 1994-95Breogán arrasa al Barça. "El Mundo Deportivo", 27 de setembro de 1999, páxina 58CB Breogán - FC BarcelonaA FEB invita a participar nunha nova Liga EuropeaCharlie Bell na prensa estatalMáximos anotadores 2005Tempada 2005-06 : Tódolos Xogadores da Xornada""Non quero pensar nunha man negra, mais pregúntome que está a pasar""o orixinalRaúl López, orgulloso dos xogadores, presume da boa saúde económica do BreogánJulio González confirma que cesa como presidente del BreogánHomenaxe a Lisardo GómezA tempada do rexurdimento celesteEntrevista a Lisardo GómezEl COB dinamita el Pazo para forzar el quinto (69-73)Cafés Candelas, patrocinador del CB Breogán"Suso Lázare, novo presidente do Breogán"o orixinalCafés Candelas Breogán firma el mayor triunfo de la historiaEl Breogán realizará 17 homenajes por su cincuenta aniversario"O Breogán honra ao seu fundador e primeiro presidente"o orixinalMiguel Giao recibiu a homenaxe do PazoHomenaxe aos primeiros gladiadores celestesO home que nos amosa como ver o Breo co corazónTita Franco será homenaxeada polos #50anosdeBreoJulio Vila recibirá unha homenaxe in memoriam polos #50anosdeBreo"O Breogán homenaxeará aos seus aboados máis veteráns"Pechada ovación a «Capi» Sanmartín e Ricardo «Corazón de González»Homenaxe por décadas de informaciónPaco García volve ao Pazo con motivo do 50 aniversario"Resultados y clasificaciones""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, campión da Copa Princesa""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, equipo ACB"C.B. Breogán"Proxecto social"o orixinal"Centros asociados"o orixinalFicha en imdb.comMario Camus trata la recuperación del amor en 'La vieja música', su última película"Páxina web oficial""Club Baloncesto Breogán""C. B. Breogán S.A.D."eehttp://www.fegaba.com

                    Vilaño, A Laracha Índice Patrimonio | Lugares e parroquias | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación43°14′52″N 8°36′03″O / 43.24775, -8.60070

                    Cegueira Índice Epidemioloxía | Deficiencia visual | Tipos de cegueira | Principais causas de cegueira | Tratamento | Técnicas de adaptación e axudas | Vida dos cegos | Primeiros auxilios | Crenzas respecto das persoas cegas | Crenzas das persoas cegas | O neno deficiente visual | Aspectos psicolóxicos da cegueira | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación54.054.154.436928256blindnessDicionario da Real Academia GalegaPortal das Palabras"International Standards: Visual Standards — Aspects and Ranges of Vision Loss with Emphasis on Population Surveys.""Visual impairment and blindness""Presentan un plan para previr a cegueira"o orixinalACCDV Associació Catalana de Cecs i Disminuïts Visuals - PMFTrachoma"Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis"1844137110.1056/NEJMoa0802268Cans guía - os mellores amigos dos cegosArquivadoEscola de cans guía para cegos en Mortágua, PortugalArquivado"Tecnología para ciegos y deficientes visuales. Recopilación de recursos gratuitos en la Red""Colorino""‘COL.diesis’, escuchar los sonidos del color""COL.diesis: Transforming Colour into Melody and Implementing the Result in a Colour Sensor Device"o orixinal"Sistema de desarrollo de sinestesia color-sonido para invidentes utilizando un protocolo de audio""Enseñanza táctil - geometría y color. Juegos didácticos para niños ciegos y videntes""Sistema Constanz"L'ocupació laboral dels cecs a l'Estat espanyol està pràcticament equiparada a la de les persones amb visió, entrevista amb Pedro ZuritaONCE (Organización Nacional de Cegos de España)Prevención da cegueiraDescrición de deficiencias visuais (Disc@pnet)Braillín, un boneco atractivo para calquera neno, con ou sen discapacidade, que permite familiarizarse co sistema de escritura e lectura brailleAxudas Técnicas36838ID00897494007150-90057129528256DOID:1432HP:0000618D001766C10.597.751.941.162C97109C0155020