Linux Teaming TLB - same MAC address on both interfacesMAC address filtering in LinuxCisco and Linux and VlansUbuntu Linux - two interfaces, same subnet, different vlan - MAC/ARP issuesLACP with 2 NICs working when either one is down, not when both are upARP responds with single MAC address on Linux server with multiple interfaces on the same networkRemote end of IPSec transport is 'permenantly glued' to loopback after some messing around with GREteaming with nmcli: bringing connection down and up again failsLinux bonding (balance-tlb), KVM guests and L2 switches = unicast flooding?How do I prepare for swapping a NIC using network teaming on a Windows cluster host?Linux: Bridging two ethernet connections together to allow second host onto first network
What is the context for Napoleon's quote "[the Austrians] did not know the value of five minutes"?
Explicit direct #include vs. Non-contractual transitive #include
How can this shape perfectly cover a cube?
Why can't we feel the Earth's revolution?
What is the precise meaning of "подсел на мак"?
How to write a nice frame challenge?
How do I gain the trust of other PCs?
Having some issue with notation in a Hilbert space
What kind of chart is this?
Is my research statement supposed to lead to papers in top journals?
Is it a bad idea to have a pen name with only an initial for a surname?
Redirecting output only on a successful command call
Converting 3x7 to a 1x7. Is it possible with only existing parts?
I have found ports on my Samsung smart tv running a display service. What can I do with it?
Does knowing the surface area of all faces uniquely determine a tetrahedron?
How to avoid offending original culture when making conculture inspired from original
Leaving job close to major deadlines
My student in one course asks for paid tutoring in another course. Appropriate?
Class to generate a pdf invoice
Time at 1G acceleration to travel 100000 light years
Why does my system use more RAM after an hour of usage?
Catching a robber on one line
How could I create a situation in which a PC has to make a saving throw or be forced to pet a dog?
How can I maintain game balance while allowing my player to craft genuinely useful items?
Linux Teaming TLB - same MAC address on both interfaces
MAC address filtering in LinuxCisco and Linux and VlansUbuntu Linux - two interfaces, same subnet, different vlan - MAC/ARP issuesLACP with 2 NICs working when either one is down, not when both are upARP responds with single MAC address on Linux server with multiple interfaces on the same networkRemote end of IPSec transport is 'permenantly glued' to loopback after some messing around with GREteaming with nmcli: bringing connection down and up again failsLinux bonding (balance-tlb), KVM guests and L2 switches = unicast flooding?How do I prepare for swapping a NIC using network teaming on a Windows cluster host?Linux: Bridging two ethernet connections together to allow second host onto first network
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
I have following teaming configuration:
DEVICE="team0"
DEVICETYPE="Team"
ONBOOT="yes"
BOOTPROTO=none
NM_CONTROLLED="yes"
TEAM_CONFIG='"runner": "name": "loadbalance","tx_hash": ["eth", "ipv4", ipv6"],"tx_balancer": "name": "basic","ports": "em1": , "em2": '
But individual interfaces appear to have same MAC address, which makes this configuration useless, since network switch won't allow two identical MAC addresses on different ports within the same L2 domain (it will cause MAC flap or some vendors even can shutdown such ports):
em1:
link/ether 68:05:ca:02:ba:ad brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
em2:
link/ether 68:05:ca:02:ba:ad brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
However, individual ifcfg* files have differeint HWADDRS specified, anyway teaming ignores this. In active-backup configuration it would not introduce any problems since only one NIC will be transmitting.
When I configured the same with old bonding driver (mode 5 or 6), MAC addresses of individual interfaces were different and everything worked as expected. Moreover MS Windows implementation of teaming also uses different MAC addresses per interface.
What is wrong with teaming or I am missing something?
linux network-teaming
add a comment |
I have following teaming configuration:
DEVICE="team0"
DEVICETYPE="Team"
ONBOOT="yes"
BOOTPROTO=none
NM_CONTROLLED="yes"
TEAM_CONFIG='"runner": "name": "loadbalance","tx_hash": ["eth", "ipv4", ipv6"],"tx_balancer": "name": "basic","ports": "em1": , "em2": '
But individual interfaces appear to have same MAC address, which makes this configuration useless, since network switch won't allow two identical MAC addresses on different ports within the same L2 domain (it will cause MAC flap or some vendors even can shutdown such ports):
em1:
link/ether 68:05:ca:02:ba:ad brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
em2:
link/ether 68:05:ca:02:ba:ad brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
However, individual ifcfg* files have differeint HWADDRS specified, anyway teaming ignores this. In active-backup configuration it would not introduce any problems since only one NIC will be transmitting.
When I configured the same with old bonding driver (mode 5 or 6), MAC addresses of individual interfaces were different and everything worked as expected. Moreover MS Windows implementation of teaming also uses different MAC addresses per interface.
What is wrong with teaming or I am missing something?
linux network-teaming
I believe this explains your question: access.redhat.com/solutions/2104811
– Andrii Surzhernko
May 31 at 7:57
Explains a bit but not completely - "hwaddr_policy" option works only for activebackup runner, but not for loadbalance.
– DukeNukem3D
May 31 at 11:32
add a comment |
I have following teaming configuration:
DEVICE="team0"
DEVICETYPE="Team"
ONBOOT="yes"
BOOTPROTO=none
NM_CONTROLLED="yes"
TEAM_CONFIG='"runner": "name": "loadbalance","tx_hash": ["eth", "ipv4", ipv6"],"tx_balancer": "name": "basic","ports": "em1": , "em2": '
But individual interfaces appear to have same MAC address, which makes this configuration useless, since network switch won't allow two identical MAC addresses on different ports within the same L2 domain (it will cause MAC flap or some vendors even can shutdown such ports):
em1:
link/ether 68:05:ca:02:ba:ad brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
em2:
link/ether 68:05:ca:02:ba:ad brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
However, individual ifcfg* files have differeint HWADDRS specified, anyway teaming ignores this. In active-backup configuration it would not introduce any problems since only one NIC will be transmitting.
When I configured the same with old bonding driver (mode 5 or 6), MAC addresses of individual interfaces were different and everything worked as expected. Moreover MS Windows implementation of teaming also uses different MAC addresses per interface.
What is wrong with teaming or I am missing something?
linux network-teaming
I have following teaming configuration:
DEVICE="team0"
DEVICETYPE="Team"
ONBOOT="yes"
BOOTPROTO=none
NM_CONTROLLED="yes"
TEAM_CONFIG='"runner": "name": "loadbalance","tx_hash": ["eth", "ipv4", ipv6"],"tx_balancer": "name": "basic","ports": "em1": , "em2": '
But individual interfaces appear to have same MAC address, which makes this configuration useless, since network switch won't allow two identical MAC addresses on different ports within the same L2 domain (it will cause MAC flap or some vendors even can shutdown such ports):
em1:
link/ether 68:05:ca:02:ba:ad brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
em2:
link/ether 68:05:ca:02:ba:ad brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
However, individual ifcfg* files have differeint HWADDRS specified, anyway teaming ignores this. In active-backup configuration it would not introduce any problems since only one NIC will be transmitting.
When I configured the same with old bonding driver (mode 5 or 6), MAC addresses of individual interfaces were different and everything worked as expected. Moreover MS Windows implementation of teaming also uses different MAC addresses per interface.
What is wrong with teaming or I am missing something?
linux network-teaming
linux network-teaming
asked Sep 14 '18 at 13:47
DukeNukem3DDukeNukem3D
61
61
I believe this explains your question: access.redhat.com/solutions/2104811
– Andrii Surzhernko
May 31 at 7:57
Explains a bit but not completely - "hwaddr_policy" option works only for activebackup runner, but not for loadbalance.
– DukeNukem3D
May 31 at 11:32
add a comment |
I believe this explains your question: access.redhat.com/solutions/2104811
– Andrii Surzhernko
May 31 at 7:57
Explains a bit but not completely - "hwaddr_policy" option works only for activebackup runner, but not for loadbalance.
– DukeNukem3D
May 31 at 11:32
I believe this explains your question: access.redhat.com/solutions/2104811
– Andrii Surzhernko
May 31 at 7:57
I believe this explains your question: access.redhat.com/solutions/2104811
– Andrii Surzhernko
May 31 at 7:57
Explains a bit but not completely - "hwaddr_policy" option works only for activebackup runner, but not for loadbalance.
– DukeNukem3D
May 31 at 11:32
Explains a bit but not completely - "hwaddr_policy" option works only for activebackup runner, but not for loadbalance.
– DukeNukem3D
May 31 at 11:32
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "2"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f930919%2flinux-teaming-tlb-same-mac-address-on-both-interfaces%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f930919%2flinux-teaming-tlb-same-mac-address-on-both-interfaces%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I believe this explains your question: access.redhat.com/solutions/2104811
– Andrii Surzhernko
May 31 at 7:57
Explains a bit but not completely - "hwaddr_policy" option works only for activebackup runner, but not for loadbalance.
– DukeNukem3D
May 31 at 11:32