Can I replace a Shimano FC-MT500 26/36 crankset with a Shimano Ultegra FC-R8000 36/46 set? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHow do I calculate the diameter of a chainring from the number of teeth?Can I use an “8 speed compatible” crank such as Shimano FC-2303 with a 7 speed Shimano MF-HG37 freewheel?SRAM x9 3x9 with a 10 speed Shimano SXL FC-M660 CranksetReplace crankset or cassette for better road performance on an MTB?Can I replace only the smallest cog on my rear cassette?Replacement crankset for Shimano SG B 52/39?Can I convert from a 52/42/30 crankset to 50/39/30?Larger sproket on a single speed crankset?50/34 vs 52/36 crankset for 11-32 cassette (shimano 105 5800FC)Crank Arm Compatibility - Shimano Ultegra 6800 and R8000Can not replace Shimano Octalink with 105 Crankset

How does the mv command work with external drives?

Won the lottery - how do I keep the money?

Why did we only see the N-1 starfighters in one film?

Contours of a clandestine nature

What happened in Rome, when the western empire "fell"?

What exact does MIB represent in SNMP? How is it different from OID?

How to transpose the 1st and -1th levels of arbitrarily nested array?

Sending manuscript to multiple publishers

What flight has the highest ratio of time difference to flight time?

WOW air has ceased operation, can I get my tickets refunded?

What's the best way to handle refactoring a big file?

Why do we use the plural of movies in this phrase "We went to the movies last night."?

What is the result of assigning to std::vector<T>::begin()?

Example of a Mathematician/Physicist whose Other Publications during their PhD eclipsed their PhD Thesis

Skipping indices in a product

Are there any unintended negative consequences to allowing PCs to gain multiple levels at once in a short milestone-XP game?

What was the first Unix version to run on a microcomputer?

Make solar eclipses exceedingly rare, but still have new moons

Return the Closest Prime Number

How fast would a person need to move to trick the eye?

Is it possible to search for a directory/file combination?

Different harmonic changes implied by a simple descending scale

Why didn't Khan get resurrected in the Genesis Explosion?

Indicator light circuit



Can I replace a Shimano FC-MT500 26/36 crankset with a Shimano Ultegra FC-R8000 36/46 set?



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHow do I calculate the diameter of a chainring from the number of teeth?Can I use an “8 speed compatible” crank such as Shimano FC-2303 with a 7 speed Shimano MF-HG37 freewheel?SRAM x9 3x9 with a 10 speed Shimano SXL FC-M660 CranksetReplace crankset or cassette for better road performance on an MTB?Can I replace only the smallest cog on my rear cassette?Replacement crankset for Shimano SG B 52/39?Can I convert from a 52/42/30 crankset to 50/39/30?Larger sproket on a single speed crankset?50/34 vs 52/36 crankset for 11-32 cassette (shimano 105 5800FC)Crank Arm Compatibility - Shimano Ultegra 6800 and R8000Can not replace Shimano Octalink with 105 Crankset










2















On my Kross Level 10.0 MTB (2x10) used mostly on dirt roads and pavement I find I never use 1-10 and seldom go below 15th but I need more top end speed. Wondering if the Ultegra would be a straight swap out?



Thanks!










share|improve this question







New contributor




GaryR is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
























    2















    On my Kross Level 10.0 MTB (2x10) used mostly on dirt roads and pavement I find I never use 1-10 and seldom go below 15th but I need more top end speed. Wondering if the Ultegra would be a straight swap out?



    Thanks!










    share|improve this question







    New contributor




    GaryR is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






















      2












      2








      2








      On my Kross Level 10.0 MTB (2x10) used mostly on dirt roads and pavement I find I never use 1-10 and seldom go below 15th but I need more top end speed. Wondering if the Ultegra would be a straight swap out?



      Thanks!










      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      GaryR is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      On my Kross Level 10.0 MTB (2x10) used mostly on dirt roads and pavement I find I never use 1-10 and seldom go below 15th but I need more top end speed. Wondering if the Ultegra would be a straight swap out?



      Thanks!







      shimano crankset






      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      GaryR is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      GaryR is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question






      New contributor




      GaryR is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked yesterday









      GaryRGaryR

      111




      111




      New contributor




      GaryR is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      GaryR is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      GaryR is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4














          Unfortunately no, the Ultegra crankset is not compatible, nor is any other road Shimano crank designed for a Hollowtech II bottom bracket (assuming this is your bike).



          The issue is that there are MTB and Road versions of Hollowtech BBs. MTB ones fit in 68 or 73mm shells, using 2 2.5mm spacers on 68mm ones. Road BBs only fit in 68mm shells. MTB BBs are therefore 5mm wider than road ones. Road crank axles are 5mm shorter than MTB cranks, and are only long enough for road BBs.



          If you have a 68mm BB shell you could put a road BB in it and fit a road crank but the chainline would be way off.



          You could look for larger aftermarket chainrings in the Shimano asymmetric 4-bolt pattern, but you have to deal with chainring clearance issues Andrew Henle described in his answer.






          share|improve this answer

























          • The issue is that there are MTB and Road versions of Hollowtech BBs. Doh! I forgot all about that!

            – Andrew Henle
            yesterday











          • @Swifty kross.pl/en/2019/mtb-xc/level-10-0 says SM-BB52

            – Argenti Apparatus
            12 hours ago











          • Why yes it does. Google found me what must be last yrs model kross.pl/en/2018/mtb-xc/level-10-0

            – Swifty
            12 hours ago











          • @Swifty Chances are the OP does not have a `19 model and has a bike with the PF BB instead of threaded (MT500 crank works with either) but the general principle holds - road cranks have shorter axles.

            – Argenti Apparatus
            8 hours ago











          • Thank you, your link is my bike, 19' Level 10.0

            – GaryR
            5 hours ago


















          1














          Probably not.



          Per How do I calculate the diameter of a chainring from the number of teeth? the difference in diameter of the 46-tooth chainring over the original 36-tooth chainring is going to be about 10 * 12.7 mm / 3.14159 or about 40 mm, so the difference in radius will be 20 mm, or about 0.8 inches.



          That means your front derailleur would need to be quite a bit higher than it is now, so much so that the hanger probably won't be high enough, assuming a braze-on attachment.



          So it probably won't work because of that, but you can measure how much space you have available to move the front derailleur higher to get a better idea, especially if you can measure how much space there is between the derailleur and the current crankset.



          If, for example, there's 7 mm between the front derailleur and the current chainring, and there's only 5 mm of space left in the braze-on's slot to move the front derailleur higher, there won't be enough space for a chainring that has a 20 mm larger radius.



          Also, the larger diameter of the inner chain ring might wind up hitting the chainstay. How much space is there?



          All that does assume an identical chainline, too. If the R8000 crank places the chainrings farther out or closer in, that has to be accounted for, too. That can be really important for clearing the chainstay.






          share|improve this answer


















          • 1





            Thank you Andrew, I was hoping for an assortment of chainrings to be available but it isn't the case. I can live with it as-is, just know it could be better for my use. If I ever need to climb a tree with it I know the gearing is there!

            – GaryR
            5 hours ago











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "126"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );






          GaryR is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbicycles.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f60019%2fcan-i-replace-a-shimano-fc-mt500-26-36-crankset-with-a-shimano-ultegra-fc-r8000%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4














          Unfortunately no, the Ultegra crankset is not compatible, nor is any other road Shimano crank designed for a Hollowtech II bottom bracket (assuming this is your bike).



          The issue is that there are MTB and Road versions of Hollowtech BBs. MTB ones fit in 68 or 73mm shells, using 2 2.5mm spacers on 68mm ones. Road BBs only fit in 68mm shells. MTB BBs are therefore 5mm wider than road ones. Road crank axles are 5mm shorter than MTB cranks, and are only long enough for road BBs.



          If you have a 68mm BB shell you could put a road BB in it and fit a road crank but the chainline would be way off.



          You could look for larger aftermarket chainrings in the Shimano asymmetric 4-bolt pattern, but you have to deal with chainring clearance issues Andrew Henle described in his answer.






          share|improve this answer

























          • The issue is that there are MTB and Road versions of Hollowtech BBs. Doh! I forgot all about that!

            – Andrew Henle
            yesterday











          • @Swifty kross.pl/en/2019/mtb-xc/level-10-0 says SM-BB52

            – Argenti Apparatus
            12 hours ago











          • Why yes it does. Google found me what must be last yrs model kross.pl/en/2018/mtb-xc/level-10-0

            – Swifty
            12 hours ago











          • @Swifty Chances are the OP does not have a `19 model and has a bike with the PF BB instead of threaded (MT500 crank works with either) but the general principle holds - road cranks have shorter axles.

            – Argenti Apparatus
            8 hours ago











          • Thank you, your link is my bike, 19' Level 10.0

            – GaryR
            5 hours ago















          4














          Unfortunately no, the Ultegra crankset is not compatible, nor is any other road Shimano crank designed for a Hollowtech II bottom bracket (assuming this is your bike).



          The issue is that there are MTB and Road versions of Hollowtech BBs. MTB ones fit in 68 or 73mm shells, using 2 2.5mm spacers on 68mm ones. Road BBs only fit in 68mm shells. MTB BBs are therefore 5mm wider than road ones. Road crank axles are 5mm shorter than MTB cranks, and are only long enough for road BBs.



          If you have a 68mm BB shell you could put a road BB in it and fit a road crank but the chainline would be way off.



          You could look for larger aftermarket chainrings in the Shimano asymmetric 4-bolt pattern, but you have to deal with chainring clearance issues Andrew Henle described in his answer.






          share|improve this answer

























          • The issue is that there are MTB and Road versions of Hollowtech BBs. Doh! I forgot all about that!

            – Andrew Henle
            yesterday











          • @Swifty kross.pl/en/2019/mtb-xc/level-10-0 says SM-BB52

            – Argenti Apparatus
            12 hours ago











          • Why yes it does. Google found me what must be last yrs model kross.pl/en/2018/mtb-xc/level-10-0

            – Swifty
            12 hours ago











          • @Swifty Chances are the OP does not have a `19 model and has a bike with the PF BB instead of threaded (MT500 crank works with either) but the general principle holds - road cranks have shorter axles.

            – Argenti Apparatus
            8 hours ago











          • Thank you, your link is my bike, 19' Level 10.0

            – GaryR
            5 hours ago













          4












          4








          4







          Unfortunately no, the Ultegra crankset is not compatible, nor is any other road Shimano crank designed for a Hollowtech II bottom bracket (assuming this is your bike).



          The issue is that there are MTB and Road versions of Hollowtech BBs. MTB ones fit in 68 or 73mm shells, using 2 2.5mm spacers on 68mm ones. Road BBs only fit in 68mm shells. MTB BBs are therefore 5mm wider than road ones. Road crank axles are 5mm shorter than MTB cranks, and are only long enough for road BBs.



          If you have a 68mm BB shell you could put a road BB in it and fit a road crank but the chainline would be way off.



          You could look for larger aftermarket chainrings in the Shimano asymmetric 4-bolt pattern, but you have to deal with chainring clearance issues Andrew Henle described in his answer.






          share|improve this answer















          Unfortunately no, the Ultegra crankset is not compatible, nor is any other road Shimano crank designed for a Hollowtech II bottom bracket (assuming this is your bike).



          The issue is that there are MTB and Road versions of Hollowtech BBs. MTB ones fit in 68 or 73mm shells, using 2 2.5mm spacers on 68mm ones. Road BBs only fit in 68mm shells. MTB BBs are therefore 5mm wider than road ones. Road crank axles are 5mm shorter than MTB cranks, and are only long enough for road BBs.



          If you have a 68mm BB shell you could put a road BB in it and fit a road crank but the chainline would be way off.



          You could look for larger aftermarket chainrings in the Shimano asymmetric 4-bolt pattern, but you have to deal with chainring clearance issues Andrew Henle described in his answer.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 12 hours ago

























          answered yesterday









          Argenti ApparatusArgenti Apparatus

          36.7k23891




          36.7k23891












          • The issue is that there are MTB and Road versions of Hollowtech BBs. Doh! I forgot all about that!

            – Andrew Henle
            yesterday











          • @Swifty kross.pl/en/2019/mtb-xc/level-10-0 says SM-BB52

            – Argenti Apparatus
            12 hours ago











          • Why yes it does. Google found me what must be last yrs model kross.pl/en/2018/mtb-xc/level-10-0

            – Swifty
            12 hours ago











          • @Swifty Chances are the OP does not have a `19 model and has a bike with the PF BB instead of threaded (MT500 crank works with either) but the general principle holds - road cranks have shorter axles.

            – Argenti Apparatus
            8 hours ago











          • Thank you, your link is my bike, 19' Level 10.0

            – GaryR
            5 hours ago

















          • The issue is that there are MTB and Road versions of Hollowtech BBs. Doh! I forgot all about that!

            – Andrew Henle
            yesterday











          • @Swifty kross.pl/en/2019/mtb-xc/level-10-0 says SM-BB52

            – Argenti Apparatus
            12 hours ago











          • Why yes it does. Google found me what must be last yrs model kross.pl/en/2018/mtb-xc/level-10-0

            – Swifty
            12 hours ago











          • @Swifty Chances are the OP does not have a `19 model and has a bike with the PF BB instead of threaded (MT500 crank works with either) but the general principle holds - road cranks have shorter axles.

            – Argenti Apparatus
            8 hours ago











          • Thank you, your link is my bike, 19' Level 10.0

            – GaryR
            5 hours ago
















          The issue is that there are MTB and Road versions of Hollowtech BBs. Doh! I forgot all about that!

          – Andrew Henle
          yesterday





          The issue is that there are MTB and Road versions of Hollowtech BBs. Doh! I forgot all about that!

          – Andrew Henle
          yesterday













          @Swifty kross.pl/en/2019/mtb-xc/level-10-0 says SM-BB52

          – Argenti Apparatus
          12 hours ago





          @Swifty kross.pl/en/2019/mtb-xc/level-10-0 says SM-BB52

          – Argenti Apparatus
          12 hours ago













          Why yes it does. Google found me what must be last yrs model kross.pl/en/2018/mtb-xc/level-10-0

          – Swifty
          12 hours ago





          Why yes it does. Google found me what must be last yrs model kross.pl/en/2018/mtb-xc/level-10-0

          – Swifty
          12 hours ago













          @Swifty Chances are the OP does not have a `19 model and has a bike with the PF BB instead of threaded (MT500 crank works with either) but the general principle holds - road cranks have shorter axles.

          – Argenti Apparatus
          8 hours ago





          @Swifty Chances are the OP does not have a `19 model and has a bike with the PF BB instead of threaded (MT500 crank works with either) but the general principle holds - road cranks have shorter axles.

          – Argenti Apparatus
          8 hours ago













          Thank you, your link is my bike, 19' Level 10.0

          – GaryR
          5 hours ago





          Thank you, your link is my bike, 19' Level 10.0

          – GaryR
          5 hours ago











          1














          Probably not.



          Per How do I calculate the diameter of a chainring from the number of teeth? the difference in diameter of the 46-tooth chainring over the original 36-tooth chainring is going to be about 10 * 12.7 mm / 3.14159 or about 40 mm, so the difference in radius will be 20 mm, or about 0.8 inches.



          That means your front derailleur would need to be quite a bit higher than it is now, so much so that the hanger probably won't be high enough, assuming a braze-on attachment.



          So it probably won't work because of that, but you can measure how much space you have available to move the front derailleur higher to get a better idea, especially if you can measure how much space there is between the derailleur and the current crankset.



          If, for example, there's 7 mm between the front derailleur and the current chainring, and there's only 5 mm of space left in the braze-on's slot to move the front derailleur higher, there won't be enough space for a chainring that has a 20 mm larger radius.



          Also, the larger diameter of the inner chain ring might wind up hitting the chainstay. How much space is there?



          All that does assume an identical chainline, too. If the R8000 crank places the chainrings farther out or closer in, that has to be accounted for, too. That can be really important for clearing the chainstay.






          share|improve this answer


















          • 1





            Thank you Andrew, I was hoping for an assortment of chainrings to be available but it isn't the case. I can live with it as-is, just know it could be better for my use. If I ever need to climb a tree with it I know the gearing is there!

            – GaryR
            5 hours ago















          1














          Probably not.



          Per How do I calculate the diameter of a chainring from the number of teeth? the difference in diameter of the 46-tooth chainring over the original 36-tooth chainring is going to be about 10 * 12.7 mm / 3.14159 or about 40 mm, so the difference in radius will be 20 mm, or about 0.8 inches.



          That means your front derailleur would need to be quite a bit higher than it is now, so much so that the hanger probably won't be high enough, assuming a braze-on attachment.



          So it probably won't work because of that, but you can measure how much space you have available to move the front derailleur higher to get a better idea, especially if you can measure how much space there is between the derailleur and the current crankset.



          If, for example, there's 7 mm between the front derailleur and the current chainring, and there's only 5 mm of space left in the braze-on's slot to move the front derailleur higher, there won't be enough space for a chainring that has a 20 mm larger radius.



          Also, the larger diameter of the inner chain ring might wind up hitting the chainstay. How much space is there?



          All that does assume an identical chainline, too. If the R8000 crank places the chainrings farther out or closer in, that has to be accounted for, too. That can be really important for clearing the chainstay.






          share|improve this answer


















          • 1





            Thank you Andrew, I was hoping for an assortment of chainrings to be available but it isn't the case. I can live with it as-is, just know it could be better for my use. If I ever need to climb a tree with it I know the gearing is there!

            – GaryR
            5 hours ago













          1












          1








          1







          Probably not.



          Per How do I calculate the diameter of a chainring from the number of teeth? the difference in diameter of the 46-tooth chainring over the original 36-tooth chainring is going to be about 10 * 12.7 mm / 3.14159 or about 40 mm, so the difference in radius will be 20 mm, or about 0.8 inches.



          That means your front derailleur would need to be quite a bit higher than it is now, so much so that the hanger probably won't be high enough, assuming a braze-on attachment.



          So it probably won't work because of that, but you can measure how much space you have available to move the front derailleur higher to get a better idea, especially if you can measure how much space there is between the derailleur and the current crankset.



          If, for example, there's 7 mm between the front derailleur and the current chainring, and there's only 5 mm of space left in the braze-on's slot to move the front derailleur higher, there won't be enough space for a chainring that has a 20 mm larger radius.



          Also, the larger diameter of the inner chain ring might wind up hitting the chainstay. How much space is there?



          All that does assume an identical chainline, too. If the R8000 crank places the chainrings farther out or closer in, that has to be accounted for, too. That can be really important for clearing the chainstay.






          share|improve this answer













          Probably not.



          Per How do I calculate the diameter of a chainring from the number of teeth? the difference in diameter of the 46-tooth chainring over the original 36-tooth chainring is going to be about 10 * 12.7 mm / 3.14159 or about 40 mm, so the difference in radius will be 20 mm, or about 0.8 inches.



          That means your front derailleur would need to be quite a bit higher than it is now, so much so that the hanger probably won't be high enough, assuming a braze-on attachment.



          So it probably won't work because of that, but you can measure how much space you have available to move the front derailleur higher to get a better idea, especially if you can measure how much space there is between the derailleur and the current crankset.



          If, for example, there's 7 mm between the front derailleur and the current chainring, and there's only 5 mm of space left in the braze-on's slot to move the front derailleur higher, there won't be enough space for a chainring that has a 20 mm larger radius.



          Also, the larger diameter of the inner chain ring might wind up hitting the chainstay. How much space is there?



          All that does assume an identical chainline, too. If the R8000 crank places the chainrings farther out or closer in, that has to be accounted for, too. That can be really important for clearing the chainstay.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered yesterday









          Andrew HenleAndrew Henle

          2,638814




          2,638814







          • 1





            Thank you Andrew, I was hoping for an assortment of chainrings to be available but it isn't the case. I can live with it as-is, just know it could be better for my use. If I ever need to climb a tree with it I know the gearing is there!

            – GaryR
            5 hours ago












          • 1





            Thank you Andrew, I was hoping for an assortment of chainrings to be available but it isn't the case. I can live with it as-is, just know it could be better for my use. If I ever need to climb a tree with it I know the gearing is there!

            – GaryR
            5 hours ago







          1




          1





          Thank you Andrew, I was hoping for an assortment of chainrings to be available but it isn't the case. I can live with it as-is, just know it could be better for my use. If I ever need to climb a tree with it I know the gearing is there!

          – GaryR
          5 hours ago





          Thank you Andrew, I was hoping for an assortment of chainrings to be available but it isn't the case. I can live with it as-is, just know it could be better for my use. If I ever need to climb a tree with it I know the gearing is there!

          – GaryR
          5 hours ago










          GaryR is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          GaryR is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          GaryR is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











          GaryR is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














          Thanks for contributing an answer to Bicycles Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbicycles.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f60019%2fcan-i-replace-a-shimano-fc-mt500-26-36-crankset-with-a-shimano-ultegra-fc-r8000%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Club Baloncesto Breogán Índice Historia | Pavillón | Nome | O Breogán na cultura popular | Xogadores | Adestradores | Presidentes | Palmarés | Historial | Líderes | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióncbbreogan.galCadroGuía oficial da ACB 2009-10, páxina 201Guía oficial ACB 1992, páxina 183. Editorial DB.É de 6.500 espectadores sentados axeitándose á última normativa"Estudiantes Junior, entre as mellores canteiras"o orixinalHemeroteca El Mundo Deportivo, 16 setembro de 1970, páxina 12Historia do BreogánAlfredo Pérez, o último canoneiroHistoria C.B. BreogánHemeroteca de El Mundo DeportivoJimmy Wright, norteamericano do Breogán deixará Lugo por ameazas de morteResultados de Breogán en 1986-87Resultados de Breogán en 1990-91Ficha de Velimir Perasović en acb.comResultados de Breogán en 1994-95Breogán arrasa al Barça. "El Mundo Deportivo", 27 de setembro de 1999, páxina 58CB Breogán - FC BarcelonaA FEB invita a participar nunha nova Liga EuropeaCharlie Bell na prensa estatalMáximos anotadores 2005Tempada 2005-06 : Tódolos Xogadores da Xornada""Non quero pensar nunha man negra, mais pregúntome que está a pasar""o orixinalRaúl López, orgulloso dos xogadores, presume da boa saúde económica do BreogánJulio González confirma que cesa como presidente del BreogánHomenaxe a Lisardo GómezA tempada do rexurdimento celesteEntrevista a Lisardo GómezEl COB dinamita el Pazo para forzar el quinto (69-73)Cafés Candelas, patrocinador del CB Breogán"Suso Lázare, novo presidente do Breogán"o orixinalCafés Candelas Breogán firma el mayor triunfo de la historiaEl Breogán realizará 17 homenajes por su cincuenta aniversario"O Breogán honra ao seu fundador e primeiro presidente"o orixinalMiguel Giao recibiu a homenaxe do PazoHomenaxe aos primeiros gladiadores celestesO home que nos amosa como ver o Breo co corazónTita Franco será homenaxeada polos #50anosdeBreoJulio Vila recibirá unha homenaxe in memoriam polos #50anosdeBreo"O Breogán homenaxeará aos seus aboados máis veteráns"Pechada ovación a «Capi» Sanmartín e Ricardo «Corazón de González»Homenaxe por décadas de informaciónPaco García volve ao Pazo con motivo do 50 aniversario"Resultados y clasificaciones""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, campión da Copa Princesa""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, equipo ACB"C.B. Breogán"Proxecto social"o orixinal"Centros asociados"o orixinalFicha en imdb.comMario Camus trata la recuperación del amor en 'La vieja música', su última película"Páxina web oficial""Club Baloncesto Breogán""C. B. Breogán S.A.D."eehttp://www.fegaba.com

          Vilaño, A Laracha Índice Patrimonio | Lugares e parroquias | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación43°14′52″N 8°36′03″O / 43.24775, -8.60070

          Cegueira Índice Epidemioloxía | Deficiencia visual | Tipos de cegueira | Principais causas de cegueira | Tratamento | Técnicas de adaptación e axudas | Vida dos cegos | Primeiros auxilios | Crenzas respecto das persoas cegas | Crenzas das persoas cegas | O neno deficiente visual | Aspectos psicolóxicos da cegueira | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación54.054.154.436928256blindnessDicionario da Real Academia GalegaPortal das Palabras"International Standards: Visual Standards — Aspects and Ranges of Vision Loss with Emphasis on Population Surveys.""Visual impairment and blindness""Presentan un plan para previr a cegueira"o orixinalACCDV Associació Catalana de Cecs i Disminuïts Visuals - PMFTrachoma"Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis"1844137110.1056/NEJMoa0802268Cans guía - os mellores amigos dos cegosArquivadoEscola de cans guía para cegos en Mortágua, PortugalArquivado"Tecnología para ciegos y deficientes visuales. Recopilación de recursos gratuitos en la Red""Colorino""‘COL.diesis’, escuchar los sonidos del color""COL.diesis: Transforming Colour into Melody and Implementing the Result in a Colour Sensor Device"o orixinal"Sistema de desarrollo de sinestesia color-sonido para invidentes utilizando un protocolo de audio""Enseñanza táctil - geometría y color. Juegos didácticos para niños ciegos y videntes""Sistema Constanz"L'ocupació laboral dels cecs a l'Estat espanyol està pràcticament equiparada a la de les persones amb visió, entrevista amb Pedro ZuritaONCE (Organización Nacional de Cegos de España)Prevención da cegueiraDescrición de deficiencias visuais (Disc@pnet)Braillín, un boneco atractivo para calquera neno, con ou sen discapacidade, que permite familiarizarse co sistema de escritura e lectura brailleAxudas Técnicas36838ID00897494007150-90057129528256DOID:1432HP:0000618D001766C10.597.751.941.162C97109C0155020