Can I replace a Shimano FC-MT500 26/36 crankset with a Shimano Ultegra FC-R8000 36/46 set? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHow do I calculate the diameter of a chainring from the number of teeth?Can I use an “8 speed compatible” crank such as Shimano FC-2303 with a 7 speed Shimano MF-HG37 freewheel?SRAM x9 3x9 with a 10 speed Shimano SXL FC-M660 CranksetReplace crankset or cassette for better road performance on an MTB?Can I replace only the smallest cog on my rear cassette?Replacement crankset for Shimano SG B 52/39?Can I convert from a 52/42/30 crankset to 50/39/30?Larger sproket on a single speed crankset?50/34 vs 52/36 crankset for 11-32 cassette (shimano 105 5800FC)Crank Arm Compatibility - Shimano Ultegra 6800 and R8000Can not replace Shimano Octalink with 105 Crankset
How does the mv command work with external drives?
Won the lottery - how do I keep the money?
Why did we only see the N-1 starfighters in one film?
Contours of a clandestine nature
What happened in Rome, when the western empire "fell"?
What exact does MIB represent in SNMP? How is it different from OID?
How to transpose the 1st and -1th levels of arbitrarily nested array?
Sending manuscript to multiple publishers
What flight has the highest ratio of time difference to flight time?
WOW air has ceased operation, can I get my tickets refunded?
What's the best way to handle refactoring a big file?
Why do we use the plural of movies in this phrase "We went to the movies last night."?
What is the result of assigning to std::vector<T>::begin()?
Example of a Mathematician/Physicist whose Other Publications during their PhD eclipsed their PhD Thesis
Skipping indices in a product
Are there any unintended negative consequences to allowing PCs to gain multiple levels at once in a short milestone-XP game?
What was the first Unix version to run on a microcomputer?
Make solar eclipses exceedingly rare, but still have new moons
Return the Closest Prime Number
How fast would a person need to move to trick the eye?
Is it possible to search for a directory/file combination?
Different harmonic changes implied by a simple descending scale
Why didn't Khan get resurrected in the Genesis Explosion?
Indicator light circuit
Can I replace a Shimano FC-MT500 26/36 crankset with a Shimano Ultegra FC-R8000 36/46 set?
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHow do I calculate the diameter of a chainring from the number of teeth?Can I use an “8 speed compatible” crank such as Shimano FC-2303 with a 7 speed Shimano MF-HG37 freewheel?SRAM x9 3x9 with a 10 speed Shimano SXL FC-M660 CranksetReplace crankset or cassette for better road performance on an MTB?Can I replace only the smallest cog on my rear cassette?Replacement crankset for Shimano SG B 52/39?Can I convert from a 52/42/30 crankset to 50/39/30?Larger sproket on a single speed crankset?50/34 vs 52/36 crankset for 11-32 cassette (shimano 105 5800FC)Crank Arm Compatibility - Shimano Ultegra 6800 and R8000Can not replace Shimano Octalink with 105 Crankset
On my Kross Level 10.0 MTB (2x10) used mostly on dirt roads and pavement I find I never use 1-10 and seldom go below 15th but I need more top end speed. Wondering if the Ultegra would be a straight swap out?
Thanks!
shimano crankset
New contributor
add a comment |
On my Kross Level 10.0 MTB (2x10) used mostly on dirt roads and pavement I find I never use 1-10 and seldom go below 15th but I need more top end speed. Wondering if the Ultegra would be a straight swap out?
Thanks!
shimano crankset
New contributor
add a comment |
On my Kross Level 10.0 MTB (2x10) used mostly on dirt roads and pavement I find I never use 1-10 and seldom go below 15th but I need more top end speed. Wondering if the Ultegra would be a straight swap out?
Thanks!
shimano crankset
New contributor
On my Kross Level 10.0 MTB (2x10) used mostly on dirt roads and pavement I find I never use 1-10 and seldom go below 15th but I need more top end speed. Wondering if the Ultegra would be a straight swap out?
Thanks!
shimano crankset
shimano crankset
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked yesterday
GaryRGaryR
111
111
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Unfortunately no, the Ultegra crankset is not compatible, nor is any other road Shimano crank designed for a Hollowtech II bottom bracket (assuming this is your bike).
The issue is that there are MTB and Road versions of Hollowtech BBs. MTB ones fit in 68 or 73mm shells, using 2 2.5mm spacers on 68mm ones. Road BBs only fit in 68mm shells. MTB BBs are therefore 5mm wider than road ones. Road crank axles are 5mm shorter than MTB cranks, and are only long enough for road BBs.
If you have a 68mm BB shell you could put a road BB in it and fit a road crank but the chainline would be way off.
You could look for larger aftermarket chainrings in the Shimano asymmetric 4-bolt pattern, but you have to deal with chainring clearance issues Andrew Henle described in his answer.
The issue is that there are MTB and Road versions of Hollowtech BBs. Doh! I forgot all about that!
– Andrew Henle
yesterday
@Swifty kross.pl/en/2019/mtb-xc/level-10-0 says SM-BB52
– Argenti Apparatus
12 hours ago
Why yes it does. Google found me what must be last yrs model kross.pl/en/2018/mtb-xc/level-10-0
– Swifty
12 hours ago
@Swifty Chances are the OP does not have a `19 model and has a bike with the PF BB instead of threaded (MT500 crank works with either) but the general principle holds - road cranks have shorter axles.
– Argenti Apparatus
8 hours ago
Thank you, your link is my bike, 19' Level 10.0
– GaryR
5 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
Probably not.
Per How do I calculate the diameter of a chainring from the number of teeth? the difference in diameter of the 46-tooth chainring over the original 36-tooth chainring is going to be about 10 * 12.7 mm / 3.14159
or about 40 mm, so the difference in radius will be 20 mm, or about 0.8 inches.
That means your front derailleur would need to be quite a bit higher than it is now, so much so that the hanger probably won't be high enough, assuming a braze-on attachment.
So it probably won't work because of that, but you can measure how much space you have available to move the front derailleur higher to get a better idea, especially if you can measure how much space there is between the derailleur and the current crankset.
If, for example, there's 7 mm between the front derailleur and the current chainring, and there's only 5 mm of space left in the braze-on's slot to move the front derailleur higher, there won't be enough space for a chainring that has a 20 mm larger radius.
Also, the larger diameter of the inner chain ring might wind up hitting the chainstay. How much space is there?
All that does assume an identical chainline, too. If the R8000 crank places the chainrings farther out or closer in, that has to be accounted for, too. That can be really important for clearing the chainstay.
1
Thank you Andrew, I was hoping for an assortment of chainrings to be available but it isn't the case. I can live with it as-is, just know it could be better for my use. If I ever need to climb a tree with it I know the gearing is there!
– GaryR
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "126"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
GaryR is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbicycles.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f60019%2fcan-i-replace-a-shimano-fc-mt500-26-36-crankset-with-a-shimano-ultegra-fc-r8000%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Unfortunately no, the Ultegra crankset is not compatible, nor is any other road Shimano crank designed for a Hollowtech II bottom bracket (assuming this is your bike).
The issue is that there are MTB and Road versions of Hollowtech BBs. MTB ones fit in 68 or 73mm shells, using 2 2.5mm spacers on 68mm ones. Road BBs only fit in 68mm shells. MTB BBs are therefore 5mm wider than road ones. Road crank axles are 5mm shorter than MTB cranks, and are only long enough for road BBs.
If you have a 68mm BB shell you could put a road BB in it and fit a road crank but the chainline would be way off.
You could look for larger aftermarket chainrings in the Shimano asymmetric 4-bolt pattern, but you have to deal with chainring clearance issues Andrew Henle described in his answer.
The issue is that there are MTB and Road versions of Hollowtech BBs. Doh! I forgot all about that!
– Andrew Henle
yesterday
@Swifty kross.pl/en/2019/mtb-xc/level-10-0 says SM-BB52
– Argenti Apparatus
12 hours ago
Why yes it does. Google found me what must be last yrs model kross.pl/en/2018/mtb-xc/level-10-0
– Swifty
12 hours ago
@Swifty Chances are the OP does not have a `19 model and has a bike with the PF BB instead of threaded (MT500 crank works with either) but the general principle holds - road cranks have shorter axles.
– Argenti Apparatus
8 hours ago
Thank you, your link is my bike, 19' Level 10.0
– GaryR
5 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
Unfortunately no, the Ultegra crankset is not compatible, nor is any other road Shimano crank designed for a Hollowtech II bottom bracket (assuming this is your bike).
The issue is that there are MTB and Road versions of Hollowtech BBs. MTB ones fit in 68 or 73mm shells, using 2 2.5mm spacers on 68mm ones. Road BBs only fit in 68mm shells. MTB BBs are therefore 5mm wider than road ones. Road crank axles are 5mm shorter than MTB cranks, and are only long enough for road BBs.
If you have a 68mm BB shell you could put a road BB in it and fit a road crank but the chainline would be way off.
You could look for larger aftermarket chainrings in the Shimano asymmetric 4-bolt pattern, but you have to deal with chainring clearance issues Andrew Henle described in his answer.
The issue is that there are MTB and Road versions of Hollowtech BBs. Doh! I forgot all about that!
– Andrew Henle
yesterday
@Swifty kross.pl/en/2019/mtb-xc/level-10-0 says SM-BB52
– Argenti Apparatus
12 hours ago
Why yes it does. Google found me what must be last yrs model kross.pl/en/2018/mtb-xc/level-10-0
– Swifty
12 hours ago
@Swifty Chances are the OP does not have a `19 model and has a bike with the PF BB instead of threaded (MT500 crank works with either) but the general principle holds - road cranks have shorter axles.
– Argenti Apparatus
8 hours ago
Thank you, your link is my bike, 19' Level 10.0
– GaryR
5 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
Unfortunately no, the Ultegra crankset is not compatible, nor is any other road Shimano crank designed for a Hollowtech II bottom bracket (assuming this is your bike).
The issue is that there are MTB and Road versions of Hollowtech BBs. MTB ones fit in 68 or 73mm shells, using 2 2.5mm spacers on 68mm ones. Road BBs only fit in 68mm shells. MTB BBs are therefore 5mm wider than road ones. Road crank axles are 5mm shorter than MTB cranks, and are only long enough for road BBs.
If you have a 68mm BB shell you could put a road BB in it and fit a road crank but the chainline would be way off.
You could look for larger aftermarket chainrings in the Shimano asymmetric 4-bolt pattern, but you have to deal with chainring clearance issues Andrew Henle described in his answer.
Unfortunately no, the Ultegra crankset is not compatible, nor is any other road Shimano crank designed for a Hollowtech II bottom bracket (assuming this is your bike).
The issue is that there are MTB and Road versions of Hollowtech BBs. MTB ones fit in 68 or 73mm shells, using 2 2.5mm spacers on 68mm ones. Road BBs only fit in 68mm shells. MTB BBs are therefore 5mm wider than road ones. Road crank axles are 5mm shorter than MTB cranks, and are only long enough for road BBs.
If you have a 68mm BB shell you could put a road BB in it and fit a road crank but the chainline would be way off.
You could look for larger aftermarket chainrings in the Shimano asymmetric 4-bolt pattern, but you have to deal with chainring clearance issues Andrew Henle described in his answer.
edited 12 hours ago
answered yesterday
Argenti ApparatusArgenti Apparatus
36.7k23891
36.7k23891
The issue is that there are MTB and Road versions of Hollowtech BBs. Doh! I forgot all about that!
– Andrew Henle
yesterday
@Swifty kross.pl/en/2019/mtb-xc/level-10-0 says SM-BB52
– Argenti Apparatus
12 hours ago
Why yes it does. Google found me what must be last yrs model kross.pl/en/2018/mtb-xc/level-10-0
– Swifty
12 hours ago
@Swifty Chances are the OP does not have a `19 model and has a bike with the PF BB instead of threaded (MT500 crank works with either) but the general principle holds - road cranks have shorter axles.
– Argenti Apparatus
8 hours ago
Thank you, your link is my bike, 19' Level 10.0
– GaryR
5 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
The issue is that there are MTB and Road versions of Hollowtech BBs. Doh! I forgot all about that!
– Andrew Henle
yesterday
@Swifty kross.pl/en/2019/mtb-xc/level-10-0 says SM-BB52
– Argenti Apparatus
12 hours ago
Why yes it does. Google found me what must be last yrs model kross.pl/en/2018/mtb-xc/level-10-0
– Swifty
12 hours ago
@Swifty Chances are the OP does not have a `19 model and has a bike with the PF BB instead of threaded (MT500 crank works with either) but the general principle holds - road cranks have shorter axles.
– Argenti Apparatus
8 hours ago
Thank you, your link is my bike, 19' Level 10.0
– GaryR
5 hours ago
The issue is that there are MTB and Road versions of Hollowtech BBs. Doh! I forgot all about that!
– Andrew Henle
yesterday
The issue is that there are MTB and Road versions of Hollowtech BBs. Doh! I forgot all about that!
– Andrew Henle
yesterday
@Swifty kross.pl/en/2019/mtb-xc/level-10-0 says SM-BB52
– Argenti Apparatus
12 hours ago
@Swifty kross.pl/en/2019/mtb-xc/level-10-0 says SM-BB52
– Argenti Apparatus
12 hours ago
Why yes it does. Google found me what must be last yrs model kross.pl/en/2018/mtb-xc/level-10-0
– Swifty
12 hours ago
Why yes it does. Google found me what must be last yrs model kross.pl/en/2018/mtb-xc/level-10-0
– Swifty
12 hours ago
@Swifty Chances are the OP does not have a `19 model and has a bike with the PF BB instead of threaded (MT500 crank works with either) but the general principle holds - road cranks have shorter axles.
– Argenti Apparatus
8 hours ago
@Swifty Chances are the OP does not have a `19 model and has a bike with the PF BB instead of threaded (MT500 crank works with either) but the general principle holds - road cranks have shorter axles.
– Argenti Apparatus
8 hours ago
Thank you, your link is my bike, 19' Level 10.0
– GaryR
5 hours ago
Thank you, your link is my bike, 19' Level 10.0
– GaryR
5 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
Probably not.
Per How do I calculate the diameter of a chainring from the number of teeth? the difference in diameter of the 46-tooth chainring over the original 36-tooth chainring is going to be about 10 * 12.7 mm / 3.14159
or about 40 mm, so the difference in radius will be 20 mm, or about 0.8 inches.
That means your front derailleur would need to be quite a bit higher than it is now, so much so that the hanger probably won't be high enough, assuming a braze-on attachment.
So it probably won't work because of that, but you can measure how much space you have available to move the front derailleur higher to get a better idea, especially if you can measure how much space there is between the derailleur and the current crankset.
If, for example, there's 7 mm between the front derailleur and the current chainring, and there's only 5 mm of space left in the braze-on's slot to move the front derailleur higher, there won't be enough space for a chainring that has a 20 mm larger radius.
Also, the larger diameter of the inner chain ring might wind up hitting the chainstay. How much space is there?
All that does assume an identical chainline, too. If the R8000 crank places the chainrings farther out or closer in, that has to be accounted for, too. That can be really important for clearing the chainstay.
1
Thank you Andrew, I was hoping for an assortment of chainrings to be available but it isn't the case. I can live with it as-is, just know it could be better for my use. If I ever need to climb a tree with it I know the gearing is there!
– GaryR
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Probably not.
Per How do I calculate the diameter of a chainring from the number of teeth? the difference in diameter of the 46-tooth chainring over the original 36-tooth chainring is going to be about 10 * 12.7 mm / 3.14159
or about 40 mm, so the difference in radius will be 20 mm, or about 0.8 inches.
That means your front derailleur would need to be quite a bit higher than it is now, so much so that the hanger probably won't be high enough, assuming a braze-on attachment.
So it probably won't work because of that, but you can measure how much space you have available to move the front derailleur higher to get a better idea, especially if you can measure how much space there is between the derailleur and the current crankset.
If, for example, there's 7 mm between the front derailleur and the current chainring, and there's only 5 mm of space left in the braze-on's slot to move the front derailleur higher, there won't be enough space for a chainring that has a 20 mm larger radius.
Also, the larger diameter of the inner chain ring might wind up hitting the chainstay. How much space is there?
All that does assume an identical chainline, too. If the R8000 crank places the chainrings farther out or closer in, that has to be accounted for, too. That can be really important for clearing the chainstay.
1
Thank you Andrew, I was hoping for an assortment of chainrings to be available but it isn't the case. I can live with it as-is, just know it could be better for my use. If I ever need to climb a tree with it I know the gearing is there!
– GaryR
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Probably not.
Per How do I calculate the diameter of a chainring from the number of teeth? the difference in diameter of the 46-tooth chainring over the original 36-tooth chainring is going to be about 10 * 12.7 mm / 3.14159
or about 40 mm, so the difference in radius will be 20 mm, or about 0.8 inches.
That means your front derailleur would need to be quite a bit higher than it is now, so much so that the hanger probably won't be high enough, assuming a braze-on attachment.
So it probably won't work because of that, but you can measure how much space you have available to move the front derailleur higher to get a better idea, especially if you can measure how much space there is between the derailleur and the current crankset.
If, for example, there's 7 mm between the front derailleur and the current chainring, and there's only 5 mm of space left in the braze-on's slot to move the front derailleur higher, there won't be enough space for a chainring that has a 20 mm larger radius.
Also, the larger diameter of the inner chain ring might wind up hitting the chainstay. How much space is there?
All that does assume an identical chainline, too. If the R8000 crank places the chainrings farther out or closer in, that has to be accounted for, too. That can be really important for clearing the chainstay.
Probably not.
Per How do I calculate the diameter of a chainring from the number of teeth? the difference in diameter of the 46-tooth chainring over the original 36-tooth chainring is going to be about 10 * 12.7 mm / 3.14159
or about 40 mm, so the difference in radius will be 20 mm, or about 0.8 inches.
That means your front derailleur would need to be quite a bit higher than it is now, so much so that the hanger probably won't be high enough, assuming a braze-on attachment.
So it probably won't work because of that, but you can measure how much space you have available to move the front derailleur higher to get a better idea, especially if you can measure how much space there is between the derailleur and the current crankset.
If, for example, there's 7 mm between the front derailleur and the current chainring, and there's only 5 mm of space left in the braze-on's slot to move the front derailleur higher, there won't be enough space for a chainring that has a 20 mm larger radius.
Also, the larger diameter of the inner chain ring might wind up hitting the chainstay. How much space is there?
All that does assume an identical chainline, too. If the R8000 crank places the chainrings farther out or closer in, that has to be accounted for, too. That can be really important for clearing the chainstay.
answered yesterday
Andrew HenleAndrew Henle
2,638814
2,638814
1
Thank you Andrew, I was hoping for an assortment of chainrings to be available but it isn't the case. I can live with it as-is, just know it could be better for my use. If I ever need to climb a tree with it I know the gearing is there!
– GaryR
5 hours ago
add a comment |
1
Thank you Andrew, I was hoping for an assortment of chainrings to be available but it isn't the case. I can live with it as-is, just know it could be better for my use. If I ever need to climb a tree with it I know the gearing is there!
– GaryR
5 hours ago
1
1
Thank you Andrew, I was hoping for an assortment of chainrings to be available but it isn't the case. I can live with it as-is, just know it could be better for my use. If I ever need to climb a tree with it I know the gearing is there!
– GaryR
5 hours ago
Thank you Andrew, I was hoping for an assortment of chainrings to be available but it isn't the case. I can live with it as-is, just know it could be better for my use. If I ever need to climb a tree with it I know the gearing is there!
– GaryR
5 hours ago
add a comment |
GaryR is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
GaryR is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
GaryR is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
GaryR is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Bicycles Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbicycles.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f60019%2fcan-i-replace-a-shimano-fc-mt500-26-36-crankset-with-a-shimano-ultegra-fc-r8000%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown