Azure Load Balancer Health Prob 22 Creating Log "Did not receive identification stringBack end ec2 instance is accessible through ssh and browser but fails load balancer health checkConfiguring Azure Internal Load BalancerEC2 Failing Load Balancer Health CheckIs it possible to use both an ILB and an ELB (listening on the same port) in the same Azure cloud service?Azure Internal Load Balancer Ignoring 2nd VMWhen does Azure Load-Balancer Health Probe return to normal state?Azure Load Balancing HTTP probe not workingSSL certificate and Azure classic load balancerAzure load-balancer slow to react to 503AWS Elastic Load Balancer and target group health check fail for no apparent reason
Why was Endgame Thanos so different than Infinity War Thanos?
What information do scammers need to withdraw money from an account?
Developers demotivated due to working on same project for more than 2 years
Loading Latex packages into Mathematica
How did Thanos not realise this had happened at the end of Endgame?
Centering subcaptions in a tikz pgfplot subfigure environment?
How do employ ' ("prime") in math mode at the correct depth?
Anatomically Correct Carnivorous Tree
What to do if SUS scores contradict qualitative feedback?
Is Germany still exporting arms to countries involved in Yemen?
Why does the Earth follow an elliptical trajectory rather than a parabolic one?
Why did the metro bus stop at each railway crossing, despite no warning indicating a train was coming?
What is the best way for a skeleton to impersonate human without using magic?
Does gravity affect the time evolution of a QM wave function?
Automatically anti-predictably assemble an alliterative aria
Smallest Guaranteed hash collision cycle length
Ex-manager wants to stay in touch, I don't want to
Entering the UK as a British citizen who is a Canadian permanent resident
Ito`s Lemma problem
How can a layman easily get the consensus view of what academia *thinks* about a subject?
Can someone explain homicide-related death rates?
Is there any good reason to write "it is easy to see"?
How can I answer high-school writing prompts without sounding weird and fake?
Why did I need to *reboot* to change my group membership
Azure Load Balancer Health Prob 22 Creating Log "Did not receive identification string
Back end ec2 instance is accessible through ssh and browser but fails load balancer health checkConfiguring Azure Internal Load BalancerEC2 Failing Load Balancer Health CheckIs it possible to use both an ILB and an ELB (listening on the same port) in the same Azure cloud service?Azure Internal Load Balancer Ignoring 2nd VMWhen does Azure Load-Balancer Health Probe return to normal state?Azure Load Balancing HTTP probe not workingSSL certificate and Azure classic load balancerAzure load-balancer slow to react to 503AWS Elastic Load Balancer and target group health check fail for no apparent reason
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
We have Azure Load Balancer which needs to be redirect traffic any of the Healthy IPTABLE Servers (Total 2 IPTABLE Servers). From IPTABLE server traffic will be forwarded to Other Production Servers (Which are not accessible Directly).
We have configured port 22 as health probe on Azure Load Balancer. Because of this we are getting logs created like following on Production Servers.
2019-04-27T05:52:29.443677-05:00 azneqodrt001 sshd[35446]: Did not receive identification string from 10.16.10.12
Alternatively, We have created custom port 5500 using nc command. Again we have reconfigured Load Balancer health probe with port 5500 (on IPTABLE Servers) instead of 22. But it was worked only for few minutes. Later it stopped working.
Can anyone suggest any alternative for this kind of situation.
linux azure load-balancing
add a comment |
We have Azure Load Balancer which needs to be redirect traffic any of the Healthy IPTABLE Servers (Total 2 IPTABLE Servers). From IPTABLE server traffic will be forwarded to Other Production Servers (Which are not accessible Directly).
We have configured port 22 as health probe on Azure Load Balancer. Because of this we are getting logs created like following on Production Servers.
2019-04-27T05:52:29.443677-05:00 azneqodrt001 sshd[35446]: Did not receive identification string from 10.16.10.12
Alternatively, We have created custom port 5500 using nc command. Again we have reconfigured Load Balancer health probe with port 5500 (on IPTABLE Servers) instead of 22. But it was worked only for few minutes. Later it stopped working.
Can anyone suggest any alternative for this kind of situation.
linux azure load-balancing
add a comment |
We have Azure Load Balancer which needs to be redirect traffic any of the Healthy IPTABLE Servers (Total 2 IPTABLE Servers). From IPTABLE server traffic will be forwarded to Other Production Servers (Which are not accessible Directly).
We have configured port 22 as health probe on Azure Load Balancer. Because of this we are getting logs created like following on Production Servers.
2019-04-27T05:52:29.443677-05:00 azneqodrt001 sshd[35446]: Did not receive identification string from 10.16.10.12
Alternatively, We have created custom port 5500 using nc command. Again we have reconfigured Load Balancer health probe with port 5500 (on IPTABLE Servers) instead of 22. But it was worked only for few minutes. Later it stopped working.
Can anyone suggest any alternative for this kind of situation.
linux azure load-balancing
We have Azure Load Balancer which needs to be redirect traffic any of the Healthy IPTABLE Servers (Total 2 IPTABLE Servers). From IPTABLE server traffic will be forwarded to Other Production Servers (Which are not accessible Directly).
We have configured port 22 as health probe on Azure Load Balancer. Because of this we are getting logs created like following on Production Servers.
2019-04-27T05:52:29.443677-05:00 azneqodrt001 sshd[35446]: Did not receive identification string from 10.16.10.12
Alternatively, We have created custom port 5500 using nc command. Again we have reconfigured Load Balancer health probe with port 5500 (on IPTABLE Servers) instead of 22. But it was worked only for few minutes. Later it stopped working.
Can anyone suggest any alternative for this kind of situation.
linux azure load-balancing
linux azure load-balancing
edited May 2 at 21:43
kubanczyk
10.7k42946
10.7k42946
asked May 2 at 17:50
Ram TooRam Too
61
61
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Two alternatives:
whatever useful are "IPTABLE" servers serving besides port 22, try to healthcheck that useful service; for example if they are translating (doing NAT) a port like 80 to some other port, then check port 80; it's not so good to check 22 if the customer needs 80
if you need to have that fake healthcheck port, use
nc -k -l 5500; the-kwill make it stay for more than one connection; best would be to set up a systemd unit, so it could autostart it as well as restart on failure
Yes we have created fake port on IPTABLE Servers. But still not working as IPTABLE server forwarding same load balancer scanning traffic to target system also.
– Ram Too
May 3 at 5:21
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "2"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f965617%2fazure-load-balancer-health-prob-22-creating-log-did-not-receive-identification%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Two alternatives:
whatever useful are "IPTABLE" servers serving besides port 22, try to healthcheck that useful service; for example if they are translating (doing NAT) a port like 80 to some other port, then check port 80; it's not so good to check 22 if the customer needs 80
if you need to have that fake healthcheck port, use
nc -k -l 5500; the-kwill make it stay for more than one connection; best would be to set up a systemd unit, so it could autostart it as well as restart on failure
Yes we have created fake port on IPTABLE Servers. But still not working as IPTABLE server forwarding same load balancer scanning traffic to target system also.
– Ram Too
May 3 at 5:21
add a comment |
Two alternatives:
whatever useful are "IPTABLE" servers serving besides port 22, try to healthcheck that useful service; for example if they are translating (doing NAT) a port like 80 to some other port, then check port 80; it's not so good to check 22 if the customer needs 80
if you need to have that fake healthcheck port, use
nc -k -l 5500; the-kwill make it stay for more than one connection; best would be to set up a systemd unit, so it could autostart it as well as restart on failure
Yes we have created fake port on IPTABLE Servers. But still not working as IPTABLE server forwarding same load balancer scanning traffic to target system also.
– Ram Too
May 3 at 5:21
add a comment |
Two alternatives:
whatever useful are "IPTABLE" servers serving besides port 22, try to healthcheck that useful service; for example if they are translating (doing NAT) a port like 80 to some other port, then check port 80; it's not so good to check 22 if the customer needs 80
if you need to have that fake healthcheck port, use
nc -k -l 5500; the-kwill make it stay for more than one connection; best would be to set up a systemd unit, so it could autostart it as well as restart on failure
Two alternatives:
whatever useful are "IPTABLE" servers serving besides port 22, try to healthcheck that useful service; for example if they are translating (doing NAT) a port like 80 to some other port, then check port 80; it's not so good to check 22 if the customer needs 80
if you need to have that fake healthcheck port, use
nc -k -l 5500; the-kwill make it stay for more than one connection; best would be to set up a systemd unit, so it could autostart it as well as restart on failure
answered May 2 at 21:49
kubanczykkubanczyk
10.7k42946
10.7k42946
Yes we have created fake port on IPTABLE Servers. But still not working as IPTABLE server forwarding same load balancer scanning traffic to target system also.
– Ram Too
May 3 at 5:21
add a comment |
Yes we have created fake port on IPTABLE Servers. But still not working as IPTABLE server forwarding same load balancer scanning traffic to target system also.
– Ram Too
May 3 at 5:21
Yes we have created fake port on IPTABLE Servers. But still not working as IPTABLE server forwarding same load balancer scanning traffic to target system also.
– Ram Too
May 3 at 5:21
Yes we have created fake port on IPTABLE Servers. But still not working as IPTABLE server forwarding same load balancer scanning traffic to target system also.
– Ram Too
May 3 at 5:21
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f965617%2fazure-load-balancer-health-prob-22-creating-log-did-not-receive-identification%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown