Are cells guaranteed to get at least one mitochondrion when they divide?Does every mitochondrion in a cell contain the same DNA?How are different types of cells created from zygote?Mitochondria - are they really separate organisms that once merged into eukaryotic cells?Are mitochondria transferable between cell types, individuals and species?In cell division, are daughter cells identical?Can mitochondria be regenerated by the cell?Why isn't meiosis II called mitosis (as the chromosome number doesn't half)?Why do cells divide (or copy themselves)?Cell organels during cell reproductionHow does the zygote divide much faster than other cells?

Select items in a list that contain criteria #2

Does an ice chest packed full of frozen food need ice?

Phone number to a lounge, or lounges generally

How many pairs of subsets can be formed?

Why only the fundamental frequency component is said to give useful power?

Was the Tamarian language in "Darmok" inspired by Jack Vance's "The Asutra"?

Building a road to escape Earth's gravity by making a pyramid on Antartica

Do you need type ratings for private flying?

When conversion from Integer to Single may lose precision

Last survivors from different time periods living together

Question about JavaScript Math.random() and basic logic

Strange symbol for two functions

How many times can you cast a card exiled by Release to the Wind?

How bad would a partial hash leak be, realistically?

Complex sentence - words lacking?

What LISP compilers and interpreters were available for 8-bit machines?

Does the "6 seconds per round" rule apply to speaking/roleplaying during combat situations?

Why does Kathryn say this in 12 Monkeys?

Trapping Rain Water

Why doesn’t a normal window produce an apparent rainbow?

2.8 is missing the Carve option in the Boolean Modifier

Why don't B747s start takeoffs with full throttle?

What is the advantage of carrying a tripod and ND-filters when you could use image stacking instead?

Can a user sell my software (MIT license) without modification?



Are cells guaranteed to get at least one mitochondrion when they divide?


Does every mitochondrion in a cell contain the same DNA?How are different types of cells created from zygote?Mitochondria - are they really separate organisms that once merged into eukaryotic cells?Are mitochondria transferable between cell types, individuals and species?In cell division, are daughter cells identical?Can mitochondria be regenerated by the cell?Why isn't meiosis II called mitosis (as the chromosome number doesn't half)?Why do cells divide (or copy themselves)?Cell organels during cell reproductionHow does the zygote divide much faster than other cells?













24












$begingroup$


If mitochondria exist at random within a cell, isn't there a possibility that cell division will result in a daughter cell with no mitochondria? If not, what is the process for guaranteeing at least one is present in each daughter cell? If so, what happens to that cell?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$
















    24












    $begingroup$


    If mitochondria exist at random within a cell, isn't there a possibility that cell division will result in a daughter cell with no mitochondria? If not, what is the process for guaranteeing at least one is present in each daughter cell? If so, what happens to that cell?










    share|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      24












      24








      24


      2



      $begingroup$


      If mitochondria exist at random within a cell, isn't there a possibility that cell division will result in a daughter cell with no mitochondria? If not, what is the process for guaranteeing at least one is present in each daughter cell? If so, what happens to that cell?










      share|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      If mitochondria exist at random within a cell, isn't there a possibility that cell division will result in a daughter cell with no mitochondria? If not, what is the process for guaranteeing at least one is present in each daughter cell? If so, what happens to that cell?







      cell-biology mitochondria mitosis






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked May 20 at 12:39









      sourcebugsourcebug

      14115




      14115




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          25












          $begingroup$


          Isn't there a possibility that cell division will result in a daughter
          cell with no mitochondria?




          Yes, there is always the possibility. However, there must be a strong negative selection pressure against eukaryotic life that cannot achieve the proper partitioning of mitochondria, so you can imagine that there are mechanisms in place to prevent this case.



          Mitochondria are both passively and actively partitioned to daughter cells. This is understood to occur through the cytoskeleton and with the control of mitochondrial fusion and fission at key stages of the cell cycle, prior to mitosis and cytokinesis!



          Here is a great review from several years ago that addresses your question well.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            The review is just 5 years old. If it's "several years old" then what would you say about the waiting time to be eligible for an academic job? 😁
            $endgroup$
            – WYSIWYG
            May 20 at 21:33







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I’m not sure there needs to be any strong selective pressure for this whatsoever. Stochastically, it’s quite likely (actually, virtually assured) that both daughter cells end up with at least a few mitochondria and if not, well, then one of the daughter cells dies and the other one simply divides again. Little harm done, except in gametes. And gametes mis-segregate all the time. One more error in a centillion isn’t going to make a difference.
            $endgroup$
            – Konrad Rudolph
            May 22 at 10:11







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I thought about this too. But mitochondria are no ideal gas and do not follow such rules. Also, not all mitochondria-hosting life is multi-cellular and tolerant to such errors. I would agree with your randomness point, given the following suppositions: 1. mitochondria are randomly distributed in their host cells (untrue); 2. the number of mitochondria in the daughter cell is always unimportant (untrue); 3. cytokinesis is symmetrical (very often untrue); 4. cells without mitochondria are not selected against (which cannot be universally true in all ecological scenarios).
            $endgroup$
            – S Pr
            May 22 at 11:43



















          13












          $begingroup$

          In addition to S Pr's excellent example, I wanted to point out that some very recent research describes some special behavior in oocyte development specifically related to mitochondria selection.



          Here's a easy-to-read version:
          https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/05/190515131741.htm



          Here's the original version in Nature:
          https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1213-4



          Specifically, during meiosis, the oocyte specifically "puts the mitochondria to the test" by separating all of them (fragmentation) and having each of them operate independently. (Typically mitochondria act in concert, each one potentially making up for deficiencies in their peers). Any that do not "make the cut" are eliminated, and the result is an egg cell that has the best mitochondria to pass along to the next generation.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            This is really interesting! I'd like to understand more about what "mitochondria act in concert" means. Perhaps one is better at one function while its "peer" is better at a different function? Or do you just mean that stronger ones make up for weaker ones that aren't "pulling their own weight"?
            $endgroup$
            – uhoh
            May 21 at 1:08






          • 4




            $begingroup$
            @uhoh Probably both. Mitochondria have many different functions, and they're very susceptible to genetic damage (since they store their genome in an oxygen-rich environment). Over the lifetime of an organism, many mitochondria fail to perform all or some of their functions, and one typical thing that happens with cancerous cells is that mitochondria replicate far more than usual. In the end, these rarely cause significant issues (beyond the effects of aging etc.) - with one major exception, which is the production of ova. There a single broken mitochondrion can "doom" the offspring.
            $endgroup$
            – Luaan
            May 21 at 7:35










          • $begingroup$
            Can you also cite the original research?
            $endgroup$
            – WYSIWYG
            May 23 at 12:31










          • $begingroup$
            @WYSIWYG I added a link to the Nature article... Is that acceptable? (I'm not sure how to find the link to the original research.)
            $endgroup$
            – Reginald Blue
            May 23 at 12:43


















          11












          $begingroup$

          A typical animal cell has 1000-2000 mitochondria. From a statistical point of view, assuming a random distribution of the mitochondria and that the cell splits in half, the probability of having 0 mitochondria is (1/2)^1000 or 9e-302. This makes it an impossibility for all practical purposes.



          With enough mitochondria, a process to ensure the cell splits roughly in half and a somewhat random distribution of mitochondria would be sufficient to get at least one mitochondria in each daughter cell.



          To address the assumptions:



          1. Random distribution of mitochondria - assumed in the question

          2. Cells split roughly in half - source on dividing assymetries "In somatic divisions, however, cell size asymmetry is mild and, only rarely, one daughter cell is more than double the size of the other."





          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            I think both of your assumptions are highly suspect, unless you can cite research to back them up.
            $endgroup$
            – Mike Scott
            May 21 at 8:06










          • $begingroup$
            @Mike While I agree that some citation would increase the quality of this answer, I really like the perspective of it. Other answers regard the high evolutionary pressure on cells without mitochondria and refer to mechanisms to actively prevent that case by distributing mitochondria to the daughter cells. This one brings perspective to the importance of these mechanisms: It certainly is beneficial to actively control the mitochondria distribution, but is this a necessity or just a "nice to have" feature? The actual numbers certainly are not very representative, but I like the idea of it.
            $endgroup$
            – Niklas Mertsch
            May 21 at 8:47






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @NiklasMertsch Exactly. I'm simply trying to demonstrate that in a certain class of cells, there are enough mitochondria that a random process will sufficiently guarantee distribution to the daughter cells; no active process necessary.
            $endgroup$
            – Underminer
            May 21 at 16:14











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "375"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbiology.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f84483%2fare-cells-guaranteed-to-get-at-least-one-mitochondrion-when-they-divide%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes








          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          25












          $begingroup$


          Isn't there a possibility that cell division will result in a daughter
          cell with no mitochondria?




          Yes, there is always the possibility. However, there must be a strong negative selection pressure against eukaryotic life that cannot achieve the proper partitioning of mitochondria, so you can imagine that there are mechanisms in place to prevent this case.



          Mitochondria are both passively and actively partitioned to daughter cells. This is understood to occur through the cytoskeleton and with the control of mitochondrial fusion and fission at key stages of the cell cycle, prior to mitosis and cytokinesis!



          Here is a great review from several years ago that addresses your question well.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            The review is just 5 years old. If it's "several years old" then what would you say about the waiting time to be eligible for an academic job? 😁
            $endgroup$
            – WYSIWYG
            May 20 at 21:33







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I’m not sure there needs to be any strong selective pressure for this whatsoever. Stochastically, it’s quite likely (actually, virtually assured) that both daughter cells end up with at least a few mitochondria and if not, well, then one of the daughter cells dies and the other one simply divides again. Little harm done, except in gametes. And gametes mis-segregate all the time. One more error in a centillion isn’t going to make a difference.
            $endgroup$
            – Konrad Rudolph
            May 22 at 10:11







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I thought about this too. But mitochondria are no ideal gas and do not follow such rules. Also, not all mitochondria-hosting life is multi-cellular and tolerant to such errors. I would agree with your randomness point, given the following suppositions: 1. mitochondria are randomly distributed in their host cells (untrue); 2. the number of mitochondria in the daughter cell is always unimportant (untrue); 3. cytokinesis is symmetrical (very often untrue); 4. cells without mitochondria are not selected against (which cannot be universally true in all ecological scenarios).
            $endgroup$
            – S Pr
            May 22 at 11:43
















          25












          $begingroup$


          Isn't there a possibility that cell division will result in a daughter
          cell with no mitochondria?




          Yes, there is always the possibility. However, there must be a strong negative selection pressure against eukaryotic life that cannot achieve the proper partitioning of mitochondria, so you can imagine that there are mechanisms in place to prevent this case.



          Mitochondria are both passively and actively partitioned to daughter cells. This is understood to occur through the cytoskeleton and with the control of mitochondrial fusion and fission at key stages of the cell cycle, prior to mitosis and cytokinesis!



          Here is a great review from several years ago that addresses your question well.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            The review is just 5 years old. If it's "several years old" then what would you say about the waiting time to be eligible for an academic job? 😁
            $endgroup$
            – WYSIWYG
            May 20 at 21:33







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I’m not sure there needs to be any strong selective pressure for this whatsoever. Stochastically, it’s quite likely (actually, virtually assured) that both daughter cells end up with at least a few mitochondria and if not, well, then one of the daughter cells dies and the other one simply divides again. Little harm done, except in gametes. And gametes mis-segregate all the time. One more error in a centillion isn’t going to make a difference.
            $endgroup$
            – Konrad Rudolph
            May 22 at 10:11







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I thought about this too. But mitochondria are no ideal gas and do not follow such rules. Also, not all mitochondria-hosting life is multi-cellular and tolerant to such errors. I would agree with your randomness point, given the following suppositions: 1. mitochondria are randomly distributed in their host cells (untrue); 2. the number of mitochondria in the daughter cell is always unimportant (untrue); 3. cytokinesis is symmetrical (very often untrue); 4. cells without mitochondria are not selected against (which cannot be universally true in all ecological scenarios).
            $endgroup$
            – S Pr
            May 22 at 11:43














          25












          25








          25





          $begingroup$


          Isn't there a possibility that cell division will result in a daughter
          cell with no mitochondria?




          Yes, there is always the possibility. However, there must be a strong negative selection pressure against eukaryotic life that cannot achieve the proper partitioning of mitochondria, so you can imagine that there are mechanisms in place to prevent this case.



          Mitochondria are both passively and actively partitioned to daughter cells. This is understood to occur through the cytoskeleton and with the control of mitochondrial fusion and fission at key stages of the cell cycle, prior to mitosis and cytokinesis!



          Here is a great review from several years ago that addresses your question well.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$




          Isn't there a possibility that cell division will result in a daughter
          cell with no mitochondria?




          Yes, there is always the possibility. However, there must be a strong negative selection pressure against eukaryotic life that cannot achieve the proper partitioning of mitochondria, so you can imagine that there are mechanisms in place to prevent this case.



          Mitochondria are both passively and actively partitioned to daughter cells. This is understood to occur through the cytoskeleton and with the control of mitochondrial fusion and fission at key stages of the cell cycle, prior to mitosis and cytokinesis!



          Here is a great review from several years ago that addresses your question well.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited May 20 at 14:07

























          answered May 20 at 13:29









          S PrS Pr

          2,138214




          2,138214











          • $begingroup$
            The review is just 5 years old. If it's "several years old" then what would you say about the waiting time to be eligible for an academic job? 😁
            $endgroup$
            – WYSIWYG
            May 20 at 21:33







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I’m not sure there needs to be any strong selective pressure for this whatsoever. Stochastically, it’s quite likely (actually, virtually assured) that both daughter cells end up with at least a few mitochondria and if not, well, then one of the daughter cells dies and the other one simply divides again. Little harm done, except in gametes. And gametes mis-segregate all the time. One more error in a centillion isn’t going to make a difference.
            $endgroup$
            – Konrad Rudolph
            May 22 at 10:11







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I thought about this too. But mitochondria are no ideal gas and do not follow such rules. Also, not all mitochondria-hosting life is multi-cellular and tolerant to such errors. I would agree with your randomness point, given the following suppositions: 1. mitochondria are randomly distributed in their host cells (untrue); 2. the number of mitochondria in the daughter cell is always unimportant (untrue); 3. cytokinesis is symmetrical (very often untrue); 4. cells without mitochondria are not selected against (which cannot be universally true in all ecological scenarios).
            $endgroup$
            – S Pr
            May 22 at 11:43

















          • $begingroup$
            The review is just 5 years old. If it's "several years old" then what would you say about the waiting time to be eligible for an academic job? 😁
            $endgroup$
            – WYSIWYG
            May 20 at 21:33







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I’m not sure there needs to be any strong selective pressure for this whatsoever. Stochastically, it’s quite likely (actually, virtually assured) that both daughter cells end up with at least a few mitochondria and if not, well, then one of the daughter cells dies and the other one simply divides again. Little harm done, except in gametes. And gametes mis-segregate all the time. One more error in a centillion isn’t going to make a difference.
            $endgroup$
            – Konrad Rudolph
            May 22 at 10:11







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            I thought about this too. But mitochondria are no ideal gas and do not follow such rules. Also, not all mitochondria-hosting life is multi-cellular and tolerant to such errors. I would agree with your randomness point, given the following suppositions: 1. mitochondria are randomly distributed in their host cells (untrue); 2. the number of mitochondria in the daughter cell is always unimportant (untrue); 3. cytokinesis is symmetrical (very often untrue); 4. cells without mitochondria are not selected against (which cannot be universally true in all ecological scenarios).
            $endgroup$
            – S Pr
            May 22 at 11:43
















          $begingroup$
          The review is just 5 years old. If it's "several years old" then what would you say about the waiting time to be eligible for an academic job? 😁
          $endgroup$
          – WYSIWYG
          May 20 at 21:33





          $begingroup$
          The review is just 5 years old. If it's "several years old" then what would you say about the waiting time to be eligible for an academic job? 😁
          $endgroup$
          – WYSIWYG
          May 20 at 21:33





          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          I’m not sure there needs to be any strong selective pressure for this whatsoever. Stochastically, it’s quite likely (actually, virtually assured) that both daughter cells end up with at least a few mitochondria and if not, well, then one of the daughter cells dies and the other one simply divides again. Little harm done, except in gametes. And gametes mis-segregate all the time. One more error in a centillion isn’t going to make a difference.
          $endgroup$
          – Konrad Rudolph
          May 22 at 10:11





          $begingroup$
          I’m not sure there needs to be any strong selective pressure for this whatsoever. Stochastically, it’s quite likely (actually, virtually assured) that both daughter cells end up with at least a few mitochondria and if not, well, then one of the daughter cells dies and the other one simply divides again. Little harm done, except in gametes. And gametes mis-segregate all the time. One more error in a centillion isn’t going to make a difference.
          $endgroup$
          – Konrad Rudolph
          May 22 at 10:11





          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          I thought about this too. But mitochondria are no ideal gas and do not follow such rules. Also, not all mitochondria-hosting life is multi-cellular and tolerant to such errors. I would agree with your randomness point, given the following suppositions: 1. mitochondria are randomly distributed in their host cells (untrue); 2. the number of mitochondria in the daughter cell is always unimportant (untrue); 3. cytokinesis is symmetrical (very often untrue); 4. cells without mitochondria are not selected against (which cannot be universally true in all ecological scenarios).
          $endgroup$
          – S Pr
          May 22 at 11:43





          $begingroup$
          I thought about this too. But mitochondria are no ideal gas and do not follow such rules. Also, not all mitochondria-hosting life is multi-cellular and tolerant to such errors. I would agree with your randomness point, given the following suppositions: 1. mitochondria are randomly distributed in their host cells (untrue); 2. the number of mitochondria in the daughter cell is always unimportant (untrue); 3. cytokinesis is symmetrical (very often untrue); 4. cells without mitochondria are not selected against (which cannot be universally true in all ecological scenarios).
          $endgroup$
          – S Pr
          May 22 at 11:43












          13












          $begingroup$

          In addition to S Pr's excellent example, I wanted to point out that some very recent research describes some special behavior in oocyte development specifically related to mitochondria selection.



          Here's a easy-to-read version:
          https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/05/190515131741.htm



          Here's the original version in Nature:
          https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1213-4



          Specifically, during meiosis, the oocyte specifically "puts the mitochondria to the test" by separating all of them (fragmentation) and having each of them operate independently. (Typically mitochondria act in concert, each one potentially making up for deficiencies in their peers). Any that do not "make the cut" are eliminated, and the result is an egg cell that has the best mitochondria to pass along to the next generation.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            This is really interesting! I'd like to understand more about what "mitochondria act in concert" means. Perhaps one is better at one function while its "peer" is better at a different function? Or do you just mean that stronger ones make up for weaker ones that aren't "pulling their own weight"?
            $endgroup$
            – uhoh
            May 21 at 1:08






          • 4




            $begingroup$
            @uhoh Probably both. Mitochondria have many different functions, and they're very susceptible to genetic damage (since they store their genome in an oxygen-rich environment). Over the lifetime of an organism, many mitochondria fail to perform all or some of their functions, and one typical thing that happens with cancerous cells is that mitochondria replicate far more than usual. In the end, these rarely cause significant issues (beyond the effects of aging etc.) - with one major exception, which is the production of ova. There a single broken mitochondrion can "doom" the offspring.
            $endgroup$
            – Luaan
            May 21 at 7:35










          • $begingroup$
            Can you also cite the original research?
            $endgroup$
            – WYSIWYG
            May 23 at 12:31










          • $begingroup$
            @WYSIWYG I added a link to the Nature article... Is that acceptable? (I'm not sure how to find the link to the original research.)
            $endgroup$
            – Reginald Blue
            May 23 at 12:43















          13












          $begingroup$

          In addition to S Pr's excellent example, I wanted to point out that some very recent research describes some special behavior in oocyte development specifically related to mitochondria selection.



          Here's a easy-to-read version:
          https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/05/190515131741.htm



          Here's the original version in Nature:
          https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1213-4



          Specifically, during meiosis, the oocyte specifically "puts the mitochondria to the test" by separating all of them (fragmentation) and having each of them operate independently. (Typically mitochondria act in concert, each one potentially making up for deficiencies in their peers). Any that do not "make the cut" are eliminated, and the result is an egg cell that has the best mitochondria to pass along to the next generation.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            This is really interesting! I'd like to understand more about what "mitochondria act in concert" means. Perhaps one is better at one function while its "peer" is better at a different function? Or do you just mean that stronger ones make up for weaker ones that aren't "pulling their own weight"?
            $endgroup$
            – uhoh
            May 21 at 1:08






          • 4




            $begingroup$
            @uhoh Probably both. Mitochondria have many different functions, and they're very susceptible to genetic damage (since they store their genome in an oxygen-rich environment). Over the lifetime of an organism, many mitochondria fail to perform all or some of their functions, and one typical thing that happens with cancerous cells is that mitochondria replicate far more than usual. In the end, these rarely cause significant issues (beyond the effects of aging etc.) - with one major exception, which is the production of ova. There a single broken mitochondrion can "doom" the offspring.
            $endgroup$
            – Luaan
            May 21 at 7:35










          • $begingroup$
            Can you also cite the original research?
            $endgroup$
            – WYSIWYG
            May 23 at 12:31










          • $begingroup$
            @WYSIWYG I added a link to the Nature article... Is that acceptable? (I'm not sure how to find the link to the original research.)
            $endgroup$
            – Reginald Blue
            May 23 at 12:43













          13












          13








          13





          $begingroup$

          In addition to S Pr's excellent example, I wanted to point out that some very recent research describes some special behavior in oocyte development specifically related to mitochondria selection.



          Here's a easy-to-read version:
          https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/05/190515131741.htm



          Here's the original version in Nature:
          https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1213-4



          Specifically, during meiosis, the oocyte specifically "puts the mitochondria to the test" by separating all of them (fragmentation) and having each of them operate independently. (Typically mitochondria act in concert, each one potentially making up for deficiencies in their peers). Any that do not "make the cut" are eliminated, and the result is an egg cell that has the best mitochondria to pass along to the next generation.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          In addition to S Pr's excellent example, I wanted to point out that some very recent research describes some special behavior in oocyte development specifically related to mitochondria selection.



          Here's a easy-to-read version:
          https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/05/190515131741.htm



          Here's the original version in Nature:
          https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1213-4



          Specifically, during meiosis, the oocyte specifically "puts the mitochondria to the test" by separating all of them (fragmentation) and having each of them operate independently. (Typically mitochondria act in concert, each one potentially making up for deficiencies in their peers). Any that do not "make the cut" are eliminated, and the result is an egg cell that has the best mitochondria to pass along to the next generation.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited May 23 at 12:42

























          answered May 20 at 17:50









          Reginald BlueReginald Blue

          39129




          39129











          • $begingroup$
            This is really interesting! I'd like to understand more about what "mitochondria act in concert" means. Perhaps one is better at one function while its "peer" is better at a different function? Or do you just mean that stronger ones make up for weaker ones that aren't "pulling their own weight"?
            $endgroup$
            – uhoh
            May 21 at 1:08






          • 4




            $begingroup$
            @uhoh Probably both. Mitochondria have many different functions, and they're very susceptible to genetic damage (since they store their genome in an oxygen-rich environment). Over the lifetime of an organism, many mitochondria fail to perform all or some of their functions, and one typical thing that happens with cancerous cells is that mitochondria replicate far more than usual. In the end, these rarely cause significant issues (beyond the effects of aging etc.) - with one major exception, which is the production of ova. There a single broken mitochondrion can "doom" the offspring.
            $endgroup$
            – Luaan
            May 21 at 7:35










          • $begingroup$
            Can you also cite the original research?
            $endgroup$
            – WYSIWYG
            May 23 at 12:31










          • $begingroup$
            @WYSIWYG I added a link to the Nature article... Is that acceptable? (I'm not sure how to find the link to the original research.)
            $endgroup$
            – Reginald Blue
            May 23 at 12:43
















          • $begingroup$
            This is really interesting! I'd like to understand more about what "mitochondria act in concert" means. Perhaps one is better at one function while its "peer" is better at a different function? Or do you just mean that stronger ones make up for weaker ones that aren't "pulling their own weight"?
            $endgroup$
            – uhoh
            May 21 at 1:08






          • 4




            $begingroup$
            @uhoh Probably both. Mitochondria have many different functions, and they're very susceptible to genetic damage (since they store their genome in an oxygen-rich environment). Over the lifetime of an organism, many mitochondria fail to perform all or some of their functions, and one typical thing that happens with cancerous cells is that mitochondria replicate far more than usual. In the end, these rarely cause significant issues (beyond the effects of aging etc.) - with one major exception, which is the production of ova. There a single broken mitochondrion can "doom" the offspring.
            $endgroup$
            – Luaan
            May 21 at 7:35










          • $begingroup$
            Can you also cite the original research?
            $endgroup$
            – WYSIWYG
            May 23 at 12:31










          • $begingroup$
            @WYSIWYG I added a link to the Nature article... Is that acceptable? (I'm not sure how to find the link to the original research.)
            $endgroup$
            – Reginald Blue
            May 23 at 12:43















          $begingroup$
          This is really interesting! I'd like to understand more about what "mitochondria act in concert" means. Perhaps one is better at one function while its "peer" is better at a different function? Or do you just mean that stronger ones make up for weaker ones that aren't "pulling their own weight"?
          $endgroup$
          – uhoh
          May 21 at 1:08




          $begingroup$
          This is really interesting! I'd like to understand more about what "mitochondria act in concert" means. Perhaps one is better at one function while its "peer" is better at a different function? Or do you just mean that stronger ones make up for weaker ones that aren't "pulling their own weight"?
          $endgroup$
          – uhoh
          May 21 at 1:08




          4




          4




          $begingroup$
          @uhoh Probably both. Mitochondria have many different functions, and they're very susceptible to genetic damage (since they store their genome in an oxygen-rich environment). Over the lifetime of an organism, many mitochondria fail to perform all or some of their functions, and one typical thing that happens with cancerous cells is that mitochondria replicate far more than usual. In the end, these rarely cause significant issues (beyond the effects of aging etc.) - with one major exception, which is the production of ova. There a single broken mitochondrion can "doom" the offspring.
          $endgroup$
          – Luaan
          May 21 at 7:35




          $begingroup$
          @uhoh Probably both. Mitochondria have many different functions, and they're very susceptible to genetic damage (since they store their genome in an oxygen-rich environment). Over the lifetime of an organism, many mitochondria fail to perform all or some of their functions, and one typical thing that happens with cancerous cells is that mitochondria replicate far more than usual. In the end, these rarely cause significant issues (beyond the effects of aging etc.) - with one major exception, which is the production of ova. There a single broken mitochondrion can "doom" the offspring.
          $endgroup$
          – Luaan
          May 21 at 7:35












          $begingroup$
          Can you also cite the original research?
          $endgroup$
          – WYSIWYG
          May 23 at 12:31




          $begingroup$
          Can you also cite the original research?
          $endgroup$
          – WYSIWYG
          May 23 at 12:31












          $begingroup$
          @WYSIWYG I added a link to the Nature article... Is that acceptable? (I'm not sure how to find the link to the original research.)
          $endgroup$
          – Reginald Blue
          May 23 at 12:43




          $begingroup$
          @WYSIWYG I added a link to the Nature article... Is that acceptable? (I'm not sure how to find the link to the original research.)
          $endgroup$
          – Reginald Blue
          May 23 at 12:43











          11












          $begingroup$

          A typical animal cell has 1000-2000 mitochondria. From a statistical point of view, assuming a random distribution of the mitochondria and that the cell splits in half, the probability of having 0 mitochondria is (1/2)^1000 or 9e-302. This makes it an impossibility for all practical purposes.



          With enough mitochondria, a process to ensure the cell splits roughly in half and a somewhat random distribution of mitochondria would be sufficient to get at least one mitochondria in each daughter cell.



          To address the assumptions:



          1. Random distribution of mitochondria - assumed in the question

          2. Cells split roughly in half - source on dividing assymetries "In somatic divisions, however, cell size asymmetry is mild and, only rarely, one daughter cell is more than double the size of the other."





          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            I think both of your assumptions are highly suspect, unless you can cite research to back them up.
            $endgroup$
            – Mike Scott
            May 21 at 8:06










          • $begingroup$
            @Mike While I agree that some citation would increase the quality of this answer, I really like the perspective of it. Other answers regard the high evolutionary pressure on cells without mitochondria and refer to mechanisms to actively prevent that case by distributing mitochondria to the daughter cells. This one brings perspective to the importance of these mechanisms: It certainly is beneficial to actively control the mitochondria distribution, but is this a necessity or just a "nice to have" feature? The actual numbers certainly are not very representative, but I like the idea of it.
            $endgroup$
            – Niklas Mertsch
            May 21 at 8:47






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @NiklasMertsch Exactly. I'm simply trying to demonstrate that in a certain class of cells, there are enough mitochondria that a random process will sufficiently guarantee distribution to the daughter cells; no active process necessary.
            $endgroup$
            – Underminer
            May 21 at 16:14















          11












          $begingroup$

          A typical animal cell has 1000-2000 mitochondria. From a statistical point of view, assuming a random distribution of the mitochondria and that the cell splits in half, the probability of having 0 mitochondria is (1/2)^1000 or 9e-302. This makes it an impossibility for all practical purposes.



          With enough mitochondria, a process to ensure the cell splits roughly in half and a somewhat random distribution of mitochondria would be sufficient to get at least one mitochondria in each daughter cell.



          To address the assumptions:



          1. Random distribution of mitochondria - assumed in the question

          2. Cells split roughly in half - source on dividing assymetries "In somatic divisions, however, cell size asymmetry is mild and, only rarely, one daughter cell is more than double the size of the other."





          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            I think both of your assumptions are highly suspect, unless you can cite research to back them up.
            $endgroup$
            – Mike Scott
            May 21 at 8:06










          • $begingroup$
            @Mike While I agree that some citation would increase the quality of this answer, I really like the perspective of it. Other answers regard the high evolutionary pressure on cells without mitochondria and refer to mechanisms to actively prevent that case by distributing mitochondria to the daughter cells. This one brings perspective to the importance of these mechanisms: It certainly is beneficial to actively control the mitochondria distribution, but is this a necessity or just a "nice to have" feature? The actual numbers certainly are not very representative, but I like the idea of it.
            $endgroup$
            – Niklas Mertsch
            May 21 at 8:47






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @NiklasMertsch Exactly. I'm simply trying to demonstrate that in a certain class of cells, there are enough mitochondria that a random process will sufficiently guarantee distribution to the daughter cells; no active process necessary.
            $endgroup$
            – Underminer
            May 21 at 16:14













          11












          11








          11





          $begingroup$

          A typical animal cell has 1000-2000 mitochondria. From a statistical point of view, assuming a random distribution of the mitochondria and that the cell splits in half, the probability of having 0 mitochondria is (1/2)^1000 or 9e-302. This makes it an impossibility for all practical purposes.



          With enough mitochondria, a process to ensure the cell splits roughly in half and a somewhat random distribution of mitochondria would be sufficient to get at least one mitochondria in each daughter cell.



          To address the assumptions:



          1. Random distribution of mitochondria - assumed in the question

          2. Cells split roughly in half - source on dividing assymetries "In somatic divisions, however, cell size asymmetry is mild and, only rarely, one daughter cell is more than double the size of the other."





          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          A typical animal cell has 1000-2000 mitochondria. From a statistical point of view, assuming a random distribution of the mitochondria and that the cell splits in half, the probability of having 0 mitochondria is (1/2)^1000 or 9e-302. This makes it an impossibility for all practical purposes.



          With enough mitochondria, a process to ensure the cell splits roughly in half and a somewhat random distribution of mitochondria would be sufficient to get at least one mitochondria in each daughter cell.



          To address the assumptions:



          1. Random distribution of mitochondria - assumed in the question

          2. Cells split roughly in half - source on dividing assymetries "In somatic divisions, however, cell size asymmetry is mild and, only rarely, one daughter cell is more than double the size of the other."






          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited May 21 at 15:51

























          answered May 20 at 20:08









          UnderminerUnderminer

          20117




          20117











          • $begingroup$
            I think both of your assumptions are highly suspect, unless you can cite research to back them up.
            $endgroup$
            – Mike Scott
            May 21 at 8:06










          • $begingroup$
            @Mike While I agree that some citation would increase the quality of this answer, I really like the perspective of it. Other answers regard the high evolutionary pressure on cells without mitochondria and refer to mechanisms to actively prevent that case by distributing mitochondria to the daughter cells. This one brings perspective to the importance of these mechanisms: It certainly is beneficial to actively control the mitochondria distribution, but is this a necessity or just a "nice to have" feature? The actual numbers certainly are not very representative, but I like the idea of it.
            $endgroup$
            – Niklas Mertsch
            May 21 at 8:47






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @NiklasMertsch Exactly. I'm simply trying to demonstrate that in a certain class of cells, there are enough mitochondria that a random process will sufficiently guarantee distribution to the daughter cells; no active process necessary.
            $endgroup$
            – Underminer
            May 21 at 16:14
















          • $begingroup$
            I think both of your assumptions are highly suspect, unless you can cite research to back them up.
            $endgroup$
            – Mike Scott
            May 21 at 8:06










          • $begingroup$
            @Mike While I agree that some citation would increase the quality of this answer, I really like the perspective of it. Other answers regard the high evolutionary pressure on cells without mitochondria and refer to mechanisms to actively prevent that case by distributing mitochondria to the daughter cells. This one brings perspective to the importance of these mechanisms: It certainly is beneficial to actively control the mitochondria distribution, but is this a necessity or just a "nice to have" feature? The actual numbers certainly are not very representative, but I like the idea of it.
            $endgroup$
            – Niklas Mertsch
            May 21 at 8:47






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @NiklasMertsch Exactly. I'm simply trying to demonstrate that in a certain class of cells, there are enough mitochondria that a random process will sufficiently guarantee distribution to the daughter cells; no active process necessary.
            $endgroup$
            – Underminer
            May 21 at 16:14















          $begingroup$
          I think both of your assumptions are highly suspect, unless you can cite research to back them up.
          $endgroup$
          – Mike Scott
          May 21 at 8:06




          $begingroup$
          I think both of your assumptions are highly suspect, unless you can cite research to back them up.
          $endgroup$
          – Mike Scott
          May 21 at 8:06












          $begingroup$
          @Mike While I agree that some citation would increase the quality of this answer, I really like the perspective of it. Other answers regard the high evolutionary pressure on cells without mitochondria and refer to mechanisms to actively prevent that case by distributing mitochondria to the daughter cells. This one brings perspective to the importance of these mechanisms: It certainly is beneficial to actively control the mitochondria distribution, but is this a necessity or just a "nice to have" feature? The actual numbers certainly are not very representative, but I like the idea of it.
          $endgroup$
          – Niklas Mertsch
          May 21 at 8:47




          $begingroup$
          @Mike While I agree that some citation would increase the quality of this answer, I really like the perspective of it. Other answers regard the high evolutionary pressure on cells without mitochondria and refer to mechanisms to actively prevent that case by distributing mitochondria to the daughter cells. This one brings perspective to the importance of these mechanisms: It certainly is beneficial to actively control the mitochondria distribution, but is this a necessity or just a "nice to have" feature? The actual numbers certainly are not very representative, but I like the idea of it.
          $endgroup$
          – Niklas Mertsch
          May 21 at 8:47




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          @NiklasMertsch Exactly. I'm simply trying to demonstrate that in a certain class of cells, there are enough mitochondria that a random process will sufficiently guarantee distribution to the daughter cells; no active process necessary.
          $endgroup$
          – Underminer
          May 21 at 16:14




          $begingroup$
          @NiklasMertsch Exactly. I'm simply trying to demonstrate that in a certain class of cells, there are enough mitochondria that a random process will sufficiently guarantee distribution to the daughter cells; no active process necessary.
          $endgroup$
          – Underminer
          May 21 at 16:14

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Biology Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fbiology.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f84483%2fare-cells-guaranteed-to-get-at-least-one-mitochondrion-when-they-divide%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Wikipedia:Vital articles Мазмуну Biography - Өмүр баян Philosophy and psychology - Философия жана психология Religion - Дин Social sciences - Коомдук илимдер Language and literature - Тил жана адабият Science - Илим Technology - Технология Arts and recreation - Искусство жана эс алуу History and geography - Тарых жана география Навигация менюсу

          Club Baloncesto Breogán Índice Historia | Pavillón | Nome | O Breogán na cultura popular | Xogadores | Adestradores | Presidentes | Palmarés | Historial | Líderes | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióncbbreogan.galCadroGuía oficial da ACB 2009-10, páxina 201Guía oficial ACB 1992, páxina 183. Editorial DB.É de 6.500 espectadores sentados axeitándose á última normativa"Estudiantes Junior, entre as mellores canteiras"o orixinalHemeroteca El Mundo Deportivo, 16 setembro de 1970, páxina 12Historia do BreogánAlfredo Pérez, o último canoneiroHistoria C.B. BreogánHemeroteca de El Mundo DeportivoJimmy Wright, norteamericano do Breogán deixará Lugo por ameazas de morteResultados de Breogán en 1986-87Resultados de Breogán en 1990-91Ficha de Velimir Perasović en acb.comResultados de Breogán en 1994-95Breogán arrasa al Barça. "El Mundo Deportivo", 27 de setembro de 1999, páxina 58CB Breogán - FC BarcelonaA FEB invita a participar nunha nova Liga EuropeaCharlie Bell na prensa estatalMáximos anotadores 2005Tempada 2005-06 : Tódolos Xogadores da Xornada""Non quero pensar nunha man negra, mais pregúntome que está a pasar""o orixinalRaúl López, orgulloso dos xogadores, presume da boa saúde económica do BreogánJulio González confirma que cesa como presidente del BreogánHomenaxe a Lisardo GómezA tempada do rexurdimento celesteEntrevista a Lisardo GómezEl COB dinamita el Pazo para forzar el quinto (69-73)Cafés Candelas, patrocinador del CB Breogán"Suso Lázare, novo presidente do Breogán"o orixinalCafés Candelas Breogán firma el mayor triunfo de la historiaEl Breogán realizará 17 homenajes por su cincuenta aniversario"O Breogán honra ao seu fundador e primeiro presidente"o orixinalMiguel Giao recibiu a homenaxe do PazoHomenaxe aos primeiros gladiadores celestesO home que nos amosa como ver o Breo co corazónTita Franco será homenaxeada polos #50anosdeBreoJulio Vila recibirá unha homenaxe in memoriam polos #50anosdeBreo"O Breogán homenaxeará aos seus aboados máis veteráns"Pechada ovación a «Capi» Sanmartín e Ricardo «Corazón de González»Homenaxe por décadas de informaciónPaco García volve ao Pazo con motivo do 50 aniversario"Resultados y clasificaciones""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, campión da Copa Princesa""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, equipo ACB"C.B. Breogán"Proxecto social"o orixinal"Centros asociados"o orixinalFicha en imdb.comMario Camus trata la recuperación del amor en 'La vieja música', su última película"Páxina web oficial""Club Baloncesto Breogán""C. B. Breogán S.A.D."eehttp://www.fegaba.com

          What should I write in an apology letter, since I have decided not to join a company after accepting an offer letterShould I keep looking after accepting a job offer?What should I do when I've been verbally told I would get an offer letter, but still haven't gotten one after 4 weeks?Do I accept an offer from a company that I am not likely to join?New job hasn't confirmed starting date and I want to give current employer as much notice as possibleHow should I address my manager in my resignation letter?HR delayed background verification, now jobless as resignedNo email communication after accepting a formal written offer. How should I phrase the call?What should I do if after receiving a verbal offer letter I am informed that my written job offer is put on hold due to some internal issues?Should I inform the current employer that I am about to resign within 1-2 weeks since I have signed the offer letter and waiting for visa?What company will do, if I send their offer letter to another company