Otdfbt

Can an Eldritch Knight use Action Surge and thus Arcane Charge even when surprised?

Select items in a list that contain criteria #2

Is any name of Vishnu Siva?

Payment instructions from HomeAway look fishy to me

Select items in a list that contain criteria

Russian equivalent of the French expression "broyer du noir"

Average spam confidence

Do the English have an ancient (obsolete) verb for the action of the book opening?

Java guess the number

Are "living" organ banks practical?

Why is the relationship between frequency and pitch exponential?

What are the words for people who cause trouble believing they know better?

How were concentration and extermination camp guards recruited?

How to retract the pitched idea from employer?

How Can I Tell The Difference Between Unmarked Sugar and Stevia?

How do photons get into the eyes?

Smooth switching between 12v batteries, with toggle switch

After the loss of Challenger, why weren’t Galileo and Ulysses launched by Centaurs on expendable boosters?

Cause of continuous spectral lines

What can plausibly explain many of my very long and low-tech bridges?

Avoiding cliches when writing gods

Does there exist a word to express a male who behaves as a female?

About the expansion of seq_set_split

2.8 is missing the Carve option in the Boolean Modifier

What is the purpose of the yellow wired panels on the IBM 360 Model 20?

Information about Sabre-ADS Model 757 terminalFound an IBM 5291. What is it, from when, and how much is it worth?IBM Model M2 stuck on Scroll and Caps Lock, no keys reactingCyrillic Ж on IBM 1620?Are there alternative BIOS ROMs for the IBM 5162?Choosing a VGA card for the IBM 5162?Connect IBM 3481 terminal to RS232?My floppy drive in my IBM model 8525-001 doesn't seem to be workingIn IBM SCRIPT/VS, what does DSM stand for in macros DSMFIG, DSMLISTPatent barriers to IBM mainframe compatibility?

12

1

I just finished reading a story about an IBM 360 Model 20 rescue, and some of the pictures caught my eye.

Specifically this one:

Searching online, led me to several more pictures, all with obviously different configurations. It seems that this panel is exposed in a way that makes changing the wiring "easy".

What is the purpose of these wiring panels? Did changing the wiring somehow configure the operation and features of the computer?

ibm mainframe

share|improve this question

asked May 20 at 11:37

Bradley UffnerBradley Uffner

1635

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  That poor IBM 360, lost in a decrepit warehouse. The article now appears at The Register _Wanted: Big iron geeks to help restore IBM 360 mainframe rescued from defunct German factory by other big iron geeks: Why random plans made in pub shouldn't always be acted upon . "They chanced upon a listing for an IBM 360 Model 20 or, as the German ad put it, "a relatively rare plant Puma Computer IBM 2020 probably from the 1980s in red". Yeah, there is a photo of a Puma apparel decal on the machine.
  
  – David Tonhofer
  May 21 at 9:42
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  This article generated some buzz on slashdot. I don't think this is authoritative enough to post as an answer, but a user there mentions "IBM was big on [wire-wrapping] as a way to customize hardware." slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=13991796&cid=58620992
  
  – tolos
  May 21 at 13:18
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

12

1

I just finished reading a story about an IBM 360 Model 20 rescue, and some of the pictures caught my eye.

Specifically this one:

Searching online, led me to several more pictures, all with obviously different configurations. It seems that this panel is exposed in a way that makes changing the wiring "easy".

What is the purpose of these wiring panels? Did changing the wiring somehow configure the operation and features of the computer?

ibm mainframe

share|improve this question

asked May 20 at 11:37

Bradley UffnerBradley Uffner

1635

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  That poor IBM 360, lost in a decrepit warehouse. The article now appears at The Register _Wanted: Big iron geeks to help restore IBM 360 mainframe rescued from defunct German factory by other big iron geeks: Why random plans made in pub shouldn't always be acted upon . "They chanced upon a listing for an IBM 360 Model 20 or, as the German ad put it, "a relatively rare plant Puma Computer IBM 2020 probably from the 1980s in red". Yeah, there is a photo of a Puma apparel decal on the machine.
  
  – David Tonhofer
  May 21 at 9:42
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  This article generated some buzz on slashdot. I don't think this is authoritative enough to post as an answer, but a user there mentions "IBM was big on [wire-wrapping] as a way to customize hardware." slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=13991796&cid=58620992
  
  – tolos
  May 21 at 13:18
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

I just finished reading a story about an IBM 360 Model 20 rescue, and some of the pictures caught my eye.

Specifically this one:

Searching online, led me to several more pictures, all with obviously different configurations. It seems that this panel is exposed in a way that makes changing the wiring "easy".

What is the purpose of these wiring panels? Did changing the wiring somehow configure the operation and features of the computer?

ibm mainframe

share|improve this question

asked May 20 at 11:37

Bradley UffnerBradley Uffner

1635

share|improve this question

asked May 20 at 11:37

Bradley UffnerBradley Uffner

1635

share|improve this question

asked May 20 at 11:37

Bradley UffnerBradley Uffner

1635

asked May 20 at 11:37

Bradley UffnerBradley Uffner

1635

asked May 20 at 11:37

Bradley UffnerBradley Uffner

1635

2 Answers
2

active

oldest

votes

17

What is the purpose of the yellow wired panels

It's the backplane, simply the wiring of the machine.

on the IBM 360 Model 20?

Not just there, but next to every mainframe was made that way. Depending on planned (and ordered) production run some would get printed boards, but usually all wiring was done as wire-wrap. The -20 was sold in quite high numbers and above fotos show a somewhat late model. But even here not all routing was done on a PCB, but as wirewrap.

Being trained on this technology in the late 70s, I still remember countless hours spend in debugging and adding of patches.

share|improve this answer

answered May 20 at 13:42

RaffzahnRaffzahn

59.5k6147246

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  So the wiring really wasn't meant to be changed at all? Are the differences between the photos just due to how the wires were routed on that particular unit, or possibly different production runs with different component layouts?
  
  – Bradley Uffner
  May 20 at 14:00
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @BradleyUffner I don't think there are any significant differences between the wiring in the two photos. In the first photo you are looking down on the back plane from above. In the second we are looking at it from an angle between the side and straight on.
  
  – JeremyP
  May 20 at 14:28
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  5
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  The wiring wasn’t supposed to be changed by end-users, but it was common for service technicians to patch it (often with different-coloured wires).
  
  – Stephen Kitt
  May 20 at 14:41
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  The biggest difference in the wiring I see is what would be the top-left panel. In the top picture, the main "bus" of wires goes all the way up, and makes a hard left turn. In the 2nd picture, the "bus" splits just above the topmost "bridge" connection between panels, forming a Y shape. The top picture also contains several diagonally run wires that are not present on bottom picture.
  
  – Bradley Uffner
  May 20 at 15:08
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  3
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  There are several sources for differences. Starting with patches to increase stability (sometimes you will even find resistors or capacitors added in backplane wiring) made already in production, as well as later by service personal, over patches to add functionality (usually just a few wires, as more often than not additional hardware was build in but not activated) all the way to upgrades from one model to another (as far as the basic setup allowed). Not to mention changes to add more memory, beyond what a certain model originally supported. so yes, much changes happened, but never by users.
  
  – Raffzahn
  May 20 at 15:53
  

  
  
  
  

 | 
show 4 more comments

6

Couldn't find much on the purpose but physically those appear to be terminals that are used for wire-wrapping. You see this application used in all manner of early electronic equipment and its used to interconnect various circuits.

IBM Service technicians (customer engineers or CEs) would be the ones to actually change these (not customer serviceable).

I'm speculating but apart from circuit interconnects this could have been used as a crude form of "microcode" changes / adjustments or feature additions.

share|improve this answer

answered May 20 at 13:23

HogstromHogstrom

1613

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "648"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fretrocomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f11057%2fwhat-is-the-purpose-of-the-yellow-wired-panels-on-the-ibm-360-model-20%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

17

What is the purpose of the yellow wired panels

It's the backplane, simply the wiring of the machine.

on the IBM 360 Model 20?

Not just there, but next to every mainframe was made that way. Depending on planned (and ordered) production run some would get printed boards, but usually all wiring was done as wire-wrap. The -20 was sold in quite high numbers and above fotos show a somewhat late model. But even here not all routing was done on a PCB, but as wirewrap.

Being trained on this technology in the late 70s, I still remember countless hours spend in debugging and adding of patches.

share|improve this answer

answered May 20 at 13:42

RaffzahnRaffzahn

59.5k6147246

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  So the wiring really wasn't meant to be changed at all? Are the differences between the photos just due to how the wires were routed on that particular unit, or possibly different production runs with different component layouts?
  
  – Bradley Uffner
  May 20 at 14:00
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @BradleyUffner I don't think there are any significant differences between the wiring in the two photos. In the first photo you are looking down on the back plane from above. In the second we are looking at it from an angle between the side and straight on.
  
  – JeremyP
  May 20 at 14:28
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  5
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  The wiring wasn’t supposed to be changed by end-users, but it was common for service technicians to patch it (often with different-coloured wires).
  
  – Stephen Kitt
  May 20 at 14:41
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  The biggest difference in the wiring I see is what would be the top-left panel. In the top picture, the main "bus" of wires goes all the way up, and makes a hard left turn. In the 2nd picture, the "bus" splits just above the topmost "bridge" connection between panels, forming a Y shape. The top picture also contains several diagonally run wires that are not present on bottom picture.
  
  – Bradley Uffner
  May 20 at 15:08
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  3
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  There are several sources for differences. Starting with patches to increase stability (sometimes you will even find resistors or capacitors added in backplane wiring) made already in production, as well as later by service personal, over patches to add functionality (usually just a few wires, as more often than not additional hardware was build in but not activated) all the way to upgrades from one model to another (as far as the basic setup allowed). Not to mention changes to add more memory, beyond what a certain model originally supported. so yes, much changes happened, but never by users.
  
  – Raffzahn
  May 20 at 15:53
  

  
  
  
  

 | 
show 4 more comments

17

What is the purpose of the yellow wired panels

It's the backplane, simply the wiring of the machine.

on the IBM 360 Model 20?

Not just there, but next to every mainframe was made that way. Depending on planned (and ordered) production run some would get printed boards, but usually all wiring was done as wire-wrap. The -20 was sold in quite high numbers and above fotos show a somewhat late model. But even here not all routing was done on a PCB, but as wirewrap.

Being trained on this technology in the late 70s, I still remember countless hours spend in debugging and adding of patches.

share|improve this answer

answered May 20 at 13:42

RaffzahnRaffzahn

59.5k6147246

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  So the wiring really wasn't meant to be changed at all? Are the differences between the photos just due to how the wires were routed on that particular unit, or possibly different production runs with different component layouts?
  
  – Bradley Uffner
  May 20 at 14:00
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  @BradleyUffner I don't think there are any significant differences between the wiring in the two photos. In the first photo you are looking down on the back plane from above. In the second we are looking at it from an angle between the side and straight on.
  
  – JeremyP
  May 20 at 14:28
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  5
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  The wiring wasn’t supposed to be changed by end-users, but it was common for service technicians to patch it (often with different-coloured wires).
  
  – Stephen Kitt
  May 20 at 14:41
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  The biggest difference in the wiring I see is what would be the top-left panel. In the top picture, the main "bus" of wires goes all the way up, and makes a hard left turn. In the 2nd picture, the "bus" splits just above the topmost "bridge" connection between panels, forming a Y shape. The top picture also contains several diagonally run wires that are not present on bottom picture.
  
  – Bradley Uffner
  May 20 at 15:08
  
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  3
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  
  There are several sources for differences. Starting with patches to increase stability (sometimes you will even find resistors or capacitors added in backplane wiring) made already in production, as well as later by service personal, over patches to add functionality (usually just a few wires, as more often than not additional hardware was build in but not activated) all the way to upgrades from one model to another (as far as the basic setup allowed). Not to mention changes to add more memory, beyond what a certain model originally supported. so yes, much changes happened, but never by users.
  
  – Raffzahn
  May 20 at 15:53
  

  
  
  
  

 | 
show 4 more comments

What is the purpose of the yellow wired panels

It's the backplane, simply the wiring of the machine.

on the IBM 360 Model 20?

Not just there, but next to every mainframe was made that way. Depending on planned (and ordered) production run some would get printed boards, but usually all wiring was done as wire-wrap. The -20 was sold in quite high numbers and above fotos show a somewhat late model. But even here not all routing was done on a PCB, but as wirewrap.

Being trained on this technology in the late 70s, I still remember countless hours spend in debugging and adding of patches.

share|improve this answer

answered May 20 at 13:42

RaffzahnRaffzahn

59.5k6147246

share|improve this answer

answered May 20 at 13:42

RaffzahnRaffzahn

59.5k6147246

answered May 20 at 13:42

RaffzahnRaffzahn

59.5k6147246

answered May 20 at 13:42

RaffzahnRaffzahn

59.5k6147246

6

Couldn't find much on the purpose but physically those appear to be terminals that are used for wire-wrapping. You see this application used in all manner of early electronic equipment and its used to interconnect various circuits.

IBM Service technicians (customer engineers or CEs) would be the ones to actually change these (not customer serviceable).

I'm speculating but apart from circuit interconnects this could have been used as a crude form of "microcode" changes / adjustments or feature additions.

share|improve this answer

answered May 20 at 13:23

HogstromHogstrom

1613

add a comment | 

6

Couldn't find much on the purpose but physically those appear to be terminals that are used for wire-wrapping. You see this application used in all manner of early electronic equipment and its used to interconnect various circuits.

IBM Service technicians (customer engineers or CEs) would be the ones to actually change these (not customer serviceable).

I'm speculating but apart from circuit interconnects this could have been used as a crude form of "microcode" changes / adjustments or feature additions.

share|improve this answer

answered May 20 at 13:23

HogstromHogstrom

1613

add a comment | 

Couldn't find much on the purpose but physically those appear to be terminals that are used for wire-wrapping. You see this application used in all manner of early electronic equipment and its used to interconnect various circuits.

IBM Service technicians (customer engineers or CEs) would be the ones to actually change these (not customer serviceable).

I'm speculating but apart from circuit interconnects this could have been used as a crude form of "microcode" changes / adjustments or feature additions.

share|improve this answer

answered May 20 at 13:23

HogstromHogstrom

1613

share|improve this answer

answered May 20 at 13:23

HogstromHogstrom

1613

answered May 20 at 13:23

HogstromHogstrom

1613

answered May 20 at 13:23

HogstromHogstrom

1613