how can I auto complete the code in Jupyter notebook?How to add a front-end to the free Wolfram Engine?How to add a front-end to the free Wolfram Engine?
Why can I traceroute to this IP address, but not ping?
CSV how to trim values to 2 places in multiple columns using UNIX
What aircraft was used as Air Force One for the flight between Southampton and Shannon?
Getting UPS Power from One Room to Another
I have a problematic assistant manager, but I can't fire him
Why does the Mishnah use the terms poor person and homeowner when discussing carrying on Shabbat?
Why not invest in precious metals?
Interval of parallel 5ths in the resolution of a German 6th chord
How is the excise border managed in Ireland?
Is White controlling this game?
Live action TV show where High school Kids go into the virtual world and have to clear levels
Who enforces MPAA rating adherence?
Should I ask for an extra raise?
Can I utilise a baking stone to make crepes?
Is it expected that a reader will skip parts of what you write?
Why can my keyboard only digest 6 keypresses at a time?
Determining fair price for profitable mobile app business
sed + add word before string only if not exists
Artificer Creativity
Who won a Game of Bar Dice?
Why is a common reference string needed in zero knowledge proofs?
How can I get an unreasonable manager to approve time off?
If I leave the US through an airport, do I have to return through the same airport?
Teaching a class likely meant to inflate the GPA of student athletes
how can I auto complete the code in Jupyter notebook?
How to add a front-end to the free Wolfram Engine?How to add a front-end to the free Wolfram Engine?
$begingroup$
I just noticed that we could use Wolfram Language
from How to add front-end to the free Wolfram Engine?.
After a while of playing with Wolfram Language
in Jupyter notebook
, I noticed I could not auto-complete the code with Tab
.
I wonder how I can auto-complete the code.
Thanks.
jupyter-notebook
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I just noticed that we could use Wolfram Language
from How to add front-end to the free Wolfram Engine?.
After a while of playing with Wolfram Language
in Jupyter notebook
, I noticed I could not auto-complete the code with Tab
.
I wonder how I can auto-complete the code.
Thanks.
jupyter-notebook
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
The Jupyter integration is open source, and in this case, I think it is actually reasonable to say that you could implement this feature yourself (assuming you have 2 days to work on it).
$endgroup$
– Szabolcs
May 23 at 11:56
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I just noticed that we could use Wolfram Language
from How to add front-end to the free Wolfram Engine?.
After a while of playing with Wolfram Language
in Jupyter notebook
, I noticed I could not auto-complete the code with Tab
.
I wonder how I can auto-complete the code.
Thanks.
jupyter-notebook
$endgroup$
I just noticed that we could use Wolfram Language
from How to add front-end to the free Wolfram Engine?.
After a while of playing with Wolfram Language
in Jupyter notebook
, I noticed I could not auto-complete the code with Tab
.
I wonder how I can auto-complete the code.
Thanks.
jupyter-notebook
jupyter-notebook
asked May 23 at 11:49
PureLinePureLine
625417
625417
2
$begingroup$
The Jupyter integration is open source, and in this case, I think it is actually reasonable to say that you could implement this feature yourself (assuming you have 2 days to work on it).
$endgroup$
– Szabolcs
May 23 at 11:56
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
The Jupyter integration is open source, and in this case, I think it is actually reasonable to say that you could implement this feature yourself (assuming you have 2 days to work on it).
$endgroup$
– Szabolcs
May 23 at 11:56
2
2
$begingroup$
The Jupyter integration is open source, and in this case, I think it is actually reasonable to say that you could implement this feature yourself (assuming you have 2 days to work on it).
$endgroup$
– Szabolcs
May 23 at 11:56
$begingroup$
The Jupyter integration is open source, and in this case, I think it is actually reasonable to say that you could implement this feature yourself (assuming you have 2 days to work on it).
$endgroup$
– Szabolcs
May 23 at 11:56
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
https://github.com/Ludwiggle/JWLS
and
https://github.com/mmatera/iwolfram
have autocompletion.
I think they are still better alternatives to the official WRI jupyter Kernel which is not mature yet. IWolfram
must be tweaked a little to work with the new Wolfram Engine but
JWLS
works out of the box insofar it has been designed to run exclusively through wolframscript; as such, it works independently of what type of wolfram product you have installed.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I could not get iwolfram working on macOS. It just hangs when I try to set it up.
$endgroup$
– Szabolcs
May 26 at 15:21
$begingroup$
I think IWolfram set-up needs to be cleaned up by getting rid of its attempt to include Mathics and its checks on the initial response of the REPL. Then it might get installed. Did you tryJWLS
on Mac?
$endgroup$
– Fortsaint
May 26 at 16:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Currently, this feature is not included.
If you are considering implementing it, you would need to start here:
https://jupyter-client.readthedocs.io/en/stable/kernels.html#handling-messages
You would need to implement handling the relevant messages. As far as I can tell, that would be complete_request
. In Mathematica, you can use Names["something*"]
to retrieve possible matches, which then can be returned to Jupyter.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks for your hint. I am considering it. Maybe I can have a try after I graduate after next month. 囧rz.
$endgroup$
– PureLine
May 23 at 12:10
4
$begingroup$
@PureLine You do not need to accept the answer so soon. Maybe someone will actually implement it in an answer ... while asking for that would be too much for StackExchange, I can imagine that someone would get sufficiently interested.
$endgroup$
– Szabolcs
May 23 at 12:17
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "387"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f198933%2fhow-can-i-auto-complete-the-code-in-jupyter-notebook%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
https://github.com/Ludwiggle/JWLS
and
https://github.com/mmatera/iwolfram
have autocompletion.
I think they are still better alternatives to the official WRI jupyter Kernel which is not mature yet. IWolfram
must be tweaked a little to work with the new Wolfram Engine but
JWLS
works out of the box insofar it has been designed to run exclusively through wolframscript; as such, it works independently of what type of wolfram product you have installed.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I could not get iwolfram working on macOS. It just hangs when I try to set it up.
$endgroup$
– Szabolcs
May 26 at 15:21
$begingroup$
I think IWolfram set-up needs to be cleaned up by getting rid of its attempt to include Mathics and its checks on the initial response of the REPL. Then it might get installed. Did you tryJWLS
on Mac?
$endgroup$
– Fortsaint
May 26 at 16:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
https://github.com/Ludwiggle/JWLS
and
https://github.com/mmatera/iwolfram
have autocompletion.
I think they are still better alternatives to the official WRI jupyter Kernel which is not mature yet. IWolfram
must be tweaked a little to work with the new Wolfram Engine but
JWLS
works out of the box insofar it has been designed to run exclusively through wolframscript; as such, it works independently of what type of wolfram product you have installed.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I could not get iwolfram working on macOS. It just hangs when I try to set it up.
$endgroup$
– Szabolcs
May 26 at 15:21
$begingroup$
I think IWolfram set-up needs to be cleaned up by getting rid of its attempt to include Mathics and its checks on the initial response of the REPL. Then it might get installed. Did you tryJWLS
on Mac?
$endgroup$
– Fortsaint
May 26 at 16:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
https://github.com/Ludwiggle/JWLS
and
https://github.com/mmatera/iwolfram
have autocompletion.
I think they are still better alternatives to the official WRI jupyter Kernel which is not mature yet. IWolfram
must be tweaked a little to work with the new Wolfram Engine but
JWLS
works out of the box insofar it has been designed to run exclusively through wolframscript; as such, it works independently of what type of wolfram product you have installed.
$endgroup$
https://github.com/Ludwiggle/JWLS
and
https://github.com/mmatera/iwolfram
have autocompletion.
I think they are still better alternatives to the official WRI jupyter Kernel which is not mature yet. IWolfram
must be tweaked a little to work with the new Wolfram Engine but
JWLS
works out of the box insofar it has been designed to run exclusively through wolframscript; as such, it works independently of what type of wolfram product you have installed.
answered May 25 at 10:43
FortsaintFortsaint
850711
850711
1
$begingroup$
I could not get iwolfram working on macOS. It just hangs when I try to set it up.
$endgroup$
– Szabolcs
May 26 at 15:21
$begingroup$
I think IWolfram set-up needs to be cleaned up by getting rid of its attempt to include Mathics and its checks on the initial response of the REPL. Then it might get installed. Did you tryJWLS
on Mac?
$endgroup$
– Fortsaint
May 26 at 16:46
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
I could not get iwolfram working on macOS. It just hangs when I try to set it up.
$endgroup$
– Szabolcs
May 26 at 15:21
$begingroup$
I think IWolfram set-up needs to be cleaned up by getting rid of its attempt to include Mathics and its checks on the initial response of the REPL. Then it might get installed. Did you tryJWLS
on Mac?
$endgroup$
– Fortsaint
May 26 at 16:46
1
1
$begingroup$
I could not get iwolfram working on macOS. It just hangs when I try to set it up.
$endgroup$
– Szabolcs
May 26 at 15:21
$begingroup$
I could not get iwolfram working on macOS. It just hangs when I try to set it up.
$endgroup$
– Szabolcs
May 26 at 15:21
$begingroup$
I think IWolfram set-up needs to be cleaned up by getting rid of its attempt to include Mathics and its checks on the initial response of the REPL. Then it might get installed. Did you try
JWLS
on Mac?$endgroup$
– Fortsaint
May 26 at 16:46
$begingroup$
I think IWolfram set-up needs to be cleaned up by getting rid of its attempt to include Mathics and its checks on the initial response of the REPL. Then it might get installed. Did you try
JWLS
on Mac?$endgroup$
– Fortsaint
May 26 at 16:46
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Currently, this feature is not included.
If you are considering implementing it, you would need to start here:
https://jupyter-client.readthedocs.io/en/stable/kernels.html#handling-messages
You would need to implement handling the relevant messages. As far as I can tell, that would be complete_request
. In Mathematica, you can use Names["something*"]
to retrieve possible matches, which then can be returned to Jupyter.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks for your hint. I am considering it. Maybe I can have a try after I graduate after next month. 囧rz.
$endgroup$
– PureLine
May 23 at 12:10
4
$begingroup$
@PureLine You do not need to accept the answer so soon. Maybe someone will actually implement it in an answer ... while asking for that would be too much for StackExchange, I can imagine that someone would get sufficiently interested.
$endgroup$
– Szabolcs
May 23 at 12:17
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Currently, this feature is not included.
If you are considering implementing it, you would need to start here:
https://jupyter-client.readthedocs.io/en/stable/kernels.html#handling-messages
You would need to implement handling the relevant messages. As far as I can tell, that would be complete_request
. In Mathematica, you can use Names["something*"]
to retrieve possible matches, which then can be returned to Jupyter.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks for your hint. I am considering it. Maybe I can have a try after I graduate after next month. 囧rz.
$endgroup$
– PureLine
May 23 at 12:10
4
$begingroup$
@PureLine You do not need to accept the answer so soon. Maybe someone will actually implement it in an answer ... while asking for that would be too much for StackExchange, I can imagine that someone would get sufficiently interested.
$endgroup$
– Szabolcs
May 23 at 12:17
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Currently, this feature is not included.
If you are considering implementing it, you would need to start here:
https://jupyter-client.readthedocs.io/en/stable/kernels.html#handling-messages
You would need to implement handling the relevant messages. As far as I can tell, that would be complete_request
. In Mathematica, you can use Names["something*"]
to retrieve possible matches, which then can be returned to Jupyter.
$endgroup$
Currently, this feature is not included.
If you are considering implementing it, you would need to start here:
https://jupyter-client.readthedocs.io/en/stable/kernels.html#handling-messages
You would need to implement handling the relevant messages. As far as I can tell, that would be complete_request
. In Mathematica, you can use Names["something*"]
to retrieve possible matches, which then can be returned to Jupyter.
answered May 23 at 11:55
SzabolcsSzabolcs
168k17460974
168k17460974
$begingroup$
Thanks for your hint. I am considering it. Maybe I can have a try after I graduate after next month. 囧rz.
$endgroup$
– PureLine
May 23 at 12:10
4
$begingroup$
@PureLine You do not need to accept the answer so soon. Maybe someone will actually implement it in an answer ... while asking for that would be too much for StackExchange, I can imagine that someone would get sufficiently interested.
$endgroup$
– Szabolcs
May 23 at 12:17
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thanks for your hint. I am considering it. Maybe I can have a try after I graduate after next month. 囧rz.
$endgroup$
– PureLine
May 23 at 12:10
4
$begingroup$
@PureLine You do not need to accept the answer so soon. Maybe someone will actually implement it in an answer ... while asking for that would be too much for StackExchange, I can imagine that someone would get sufficiently interested.
$endgroup$
– Szabolcs
May 23 at 12:17
$begingroup$
Thanks for your hint. I am considering it. Maybe I can have a try after I graduate after next month. 囧rz.
$endgroup$
– PureLine
May 23 at 12:10
$begingroup$
Thanks for your hint. I am considering it. Maybe I can have a try after I graduate after next month. 囧rz.
$endgroup$
– PureLine
May 23 at 12:10
4
4
$begingroup$
@PureLine You do not need to accept the answer so soon. Maybe someone will actually implement it in an answer ... while asking for that would be too much for StackExchange, I can imagine that someone would get sufficiently interested.
$endgroup$
– Szabolcs
May 23 at 12:17
$begingroup$
@PureLine You do not need to accept the answer so soon. Maybe someone will actually implement it in an answer ... while asking for that would be too much for StackExchange, I can imagine that someone would get sufficiently interested.
$endgroup$
– Szabolcs
May 23 at 12:17
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f198933%2fhow-can-i-auto-complete-the-code-in-jupyter-notebook%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
The Jupyter integration is open source, and in this case, I think it is actually reasonable to say that you could implement this feature yourself (assuming you have 2 days to work on it).
$endgroup$
– Szabolcs
May 23 at 11:56