How long do XTOL and D-76 last unmixed?How long does undeveloped film last?Can leaving a print in fixer too long cause damage/staining?How to determine date photo shot or developed from pre-digital age pictures?How do I develop black and white film myself?How long will exposed film retain some latent image?Is stop bath necessary for black and white prints?What are the differences between D-76 and Xtol?How long does stock liquid developer last?How long do developed negatives last?Weird artifacts when using Tmax 100 for black-and-white reversal processing

Multi tool use
Multi tool use

Determining fair price for profitable mobile app business

Is it possible to fly backward if you have a 'really strong' headwind?

Meaning of 'lose their grip on the groins of their followers'

Is it possible for a vehicle to be manufactured without a catalytic converter?

Generate basis elements of the Steenrod algebra

Check if three arrays contains the same element

Live action TV show where High school Kids go into the virtual world and have to clear levels

Why does Sin[b-a] simplify to -Sin[a-b]?

A word that means "blending into a community too much"

How does the Around command at zero work?

Why does the Mishnah use the terms poor person and homeowner when discussing carrying on Shabbat?

Is using 'echo' to display attacker-controlled data on the terminal dangerous?

How to trick the reader into thinking they're following a redshirt instead of the protagonist?

Why does logistic function use e rather than 2?

How to handle (one's own) self-harm scars (on the arm), in a work environment?

Artificer Creativity

Teaching a class likely meant to inflate the GPA of student athletes

Traversing Oceania: A Cryptic Journey

Warning about needing "authorization" when booking ticket

Cascading Switches. Will it affect performance?

60s or 70s novel about Empire of Man making 1st contact with 1st discovered alien race

Extreme flexible working hours: how to get to know people and activities?

Someone whose aspirations exceed abilities or means

CSV how to trim values to 2 places in multiple columns using UNIX



How long do XTOL and D-76 last unmixed?


How long does undeveloped film last?Can leaving a print in fixer too long cause damage/staining?How to determine date photo shot or developed from pre-digital age pictures?How do I develop black and white film myself?How long will exposed film retain some latent image?Is stop bath necessary for black and white prints?What are the differences between D-76 and Xtol?How long does stock liquid developer last?How long do developed negatives last?Weird artifacts when using Tmax 100 for black-and-white reversal processing






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








4















When I bought my darkroom sets, I additionally acquired two powder developers, being XTOL and D-76.



I have only ever used Rodinal (Adonal) to develop my negatives, so I know little of how well such powder developers last stored unmixed.



I don't know of any production or expiration dates, but they are sealed in their original boxes and thus have never been mixed, and have been stored in the dark. Some of the paper I got together with the developer came from the 80s, but since the packages don't look all too old and worn I doubt the developers are that old. It is likely to be at least five years old.



Could I still use the powders? And if so, would there be any loss in quality?










share|improve this question




























    4















    When I bought my darkroom sets, I additionally acquired two powder developers, being XTOL and D-76.



    I have only ever used Rodinal (Adonal) to develop my negatives, so I know little of how well such powder developers last stored unmixed.



    I don't know of any production or expiration dates, but they are sealed in their original boxes and thus have never been mixed, and have been stored in the dark. Some of the paper I got together with the developer came from the 80s, but since the packages don't look all too old and worn I doubt the developers are that old. It is likely to be at least five years old.



    Could I still use the powders? And if so, would there be any loss in quality?










    share|improve this question
























      4












      4








      4








      When I bought my darkroom sets, I additionally acquired two powder developers, being XTOL and D-76.



      I have only ever used Rodinal (Adonal) to develop my negatives, so I know little of how well such powder developers last stored unmixed.



      I don't know of any production or expiration dates, but they are sealed in their original boxes and thus have never been mixed, and have been stored in the dark. Some of the paper I got together with the developer came from the 80s, but since the packages don't look all too old and worn I doubt the developers are that old. It is likely to be at least five years old.



      Could I still use the powders? And if so, would there be any loss in quality?










      share|improve this question














      When I bought my darkroom sets, I additionally acquired two powder developers, being XTOL and D-76.



      I have only ever used Rodinal (Adonal) to develop my negatives, so I know little of how well such powder developers last stored unmixed.



      I don't know of any production or expiration dates, but they are sealed in their original boxes and thus have never been mixed, and have been stored in the dark. Some of the paper I got together with the developer came from the 80s, but since the packages don't look all too old and worn I doubt the developers are that old. It is likely to be at least five years old.



      Could I still use the powders? And if so, would there be any loss in quality?







      film developing storage darkroom chemicals






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked May 23 at 12:39









      timvrhntimvrhn

      806214




      806214




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          This is almost purely anecdotal, but... I recently (3/2019) bought a bag of XTOL which has the following markings:




          © 2016 Kodak Alaris Inc.



          EXP: 2021-05




          From this I gather that Kodak gives a shelf life of 2–5 years for unmixed, unopened XTOL. (Not sure whether the copyright statement indicates year of manufacture or something else.)



          However, word on the Internet is that you may expect much longer lives from powders that have been properly stored. Cans/jars are reputed to be less porous than bags, leading to increased shelf life.



          In practical terms, I'd



          1. Open the bags/cans and inspect the contents; if the powder is white (not brown) and dry, proceed to next step.

          2. Mix it up and develop a test film.

          3. Only proceed to develop important stuff once you're satisfied that the developer still works.





          share|improve this answer























          • Thanks! First step may as well be directed at buyers inspecting their sellers' coke. ;)

            – timvrhn
            May 23 at 17:30


















          3














          The unmixed powders, such as XTOL or D-76, in their original sealed packaging can be expected to last several years.



          However, with age does come increased risks of issues.



          If the powder remains as fine grains and pours smoothly, then that is a good sign that there were no issues in storage.



          If it is clumpy, has uneven texture or colours, then treat with very high suspicions.




          Powders you suspect are more than a few years old should likely be tested before use with rolls of film you deem important.



          Extremely important rolls should probably always be processed in chemistry you've very recently tested with less important rolls. Film and chemistry is cheap, once in a lifetime shots aren't.




          • The older tins of developer are typically considered totally shelf stable if they're not damaged, and are potentially good for decades.

          • The newer foil packets are apparently more prone to spoilage, and may quietly fail after only a few years with poor visual indication.

          • Stock solution made from older powders can fail faster than normal due to being more oxidized than expected. In general it is good to avoid letting mixed stock solution sit too long, but aim to use up older chemistry sooner rather than later.

          In general it is good to treat all chemistry with some suspicion and care, and increase your suspicions as it ages.






          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "61"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f108438%2fhow-long-do-xtol-and-d-76-last-unmixed%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2














            This is almost purely anecdotal, but... I recently (3/2019) bought a bag of XTOL which has the following markings:




            © 2016 Kodak Alaris Inc.



            EXP: 2021-05




            From this I gather that Kodak gives a shelf life of 2–5 years for unmixed, unopened XTOL. (Not sure whether the copyright statement indicates year of manufacture or something else.)



            However, word on the Internet is that you may expect much longer lives from powders that have been properly stored. Cans/jars are reputed to be less porous than bags, leading to increased shelf life.



            In practical terms, I'd



            1. Open the bags/cans and inspect the contents; if the powder is white (not brown) and dry, proceed to next step.

            2. Mix it up and develop a test film.

            3. Only proceed to develop important stuff once you're satisfied that the developer still works.





            share|improve this answer























            • Thanks! First step may as well be directed at buyers inspecting their sellers' coke. ;)

              – timvrhn
              May 23 at 17:30















            2














            This is almost purely anecdotal, but... I recently (3/2019) bought a bag of XTOL which has the following markings:




            © 2016 Kodak Alaris Inc.



            EXP: 2021-05




            From this I gather that Kodak gives a shelf life of 2–5 years for unmixed, unopened XTOL. (Not sure whether the copyright statement indicates year of manufacture or something else.)



            However, word on the Internet is that you may expect much longer lives from powders that have been properly stored. Cans/jars are reputed to be less porous than bags, leading to increased shelf life.



            In practical terms, I'd



            1. Open the bags/cans and inspect the contents; if the powder is white (not brown) and dry, proceed to next step.

            2. Mix it up and develop a test film.

            3. Only proceed to develop important stuff once you're satisfied that the developer still works.





            share|improve this answer























            • Thanks! First step may as well be directed at buyers inspecting their sellers' coke. ;)

              – timvrhn
              May 23 at 17:30













            2












            2








            2







            This is almost purely anecdotal, but... I recently (3/2019) bought a bag of XTOL which has the following markings:




            © 2016 Kodak Alaris Inc.



            EXP: 2021-05




            From this I gather that Kodak gives a shelf life of 2–5 years for unmixed, unopened XTOL. (Not sure whether the copyright statement indicates year of manufacture or something else.)



            However, word on the Internet is that you may expect much longer lives from powders that have been properly stored. Cans/jars are reputed to be less porous than bags, leading to increased shelf life.



            In practical terms, I'd



            1. Open the bags/cans and inspect the contents; if the powder is white (not brown) and dry, proceed to next step.

            2. Mix it up and develop a test film.

            3. Only proceed to develop important stuff once you're satisfied that the developer still works.





            share|improve this answer













            This is almost purely anecdotal, but... I recently (3/2019) bought a bag of XTOL which has the following markings:




            © 2016 Kodak Alaris Inc.



            EXP: 2021-05




            From this I gather that Kodak gives a shelf life of 2–5 years for unmixed, unopened XTOL. (Not sure whether the copyright statement indicates year of manufacture or something else.)



            However, word on the Internet is that you may expect much longer lives from powders that have been properly stored. Cans/jars are reputed to be less porous than bags, leading to increased shelf life.



            In practical terms, I'd



            1. Open the bags/cans and inspect the contents; if the powder is white (not brown) and dry, proceed to next step.

            2. Mix it up and develop a test film.

            3. Only proceed to develop important stuff once you're satisfied that the developer still works.






            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered May 23 at 15:57









            KahoviusKahovius

            520110




            520110












            • Thanks! First step may as well be directed at buyers inspecting their sellers' coke. ;)

              – timvrhn
              May 23 at 17:30

















            • Thanks! First step may as well be directed at buyers inspecting their sellers' coke. ;)

              – timvrhn
              May 23 at 17:30
















            Thanks! First step may as well be directed at buyers inspecting their sellers' coke. ;)

            – timvrhn
            May 23 at 17:30





            Thanks! First step may as well be directed at buyers inspecting their sellers' coke. ;)

            – timvrhn
            May 23 at 17:30













            3














            The unmixed powders, such as XTOL or D-76, in their original sealed packaging can be expected to last several years.



            However, with age does come increased risks of issues.



            If the powder remains as fine grains and pours smoothly, then that is a good sign that there were no issues in storage.



            If it is clumpy, has uneven texture or colours, then treat with very high suspicions.




            Powders you suspect are more than a few years old should likely be tested before use with rolls of film you deem important.



            Extremely important rolls should probably always be processed in chemistry you've very recently tested with less important rolls. Film and chemistry is cheap, once in a lifetime shots aren't.




            • The older tins of developer are typically considered totally shelf stable if they're not damaged, and are potentially good for decades.

            • The newer foil packets are apparently more prone to spoilage, and may quietly fail after only a few years with poor visual indication.

            • Stock solution made from older powders can fail faster than normal due to being more oxidized than expected. In general it is good to avoid letting mixed stock solution sit too long, but aim to use up older chemistry sooner rather than later.

            In general it is good to treat all chemistry with some suspicion and care, and increase your suspicions as it ages.






            share|improve this answer



























              3














              The unmixed powders, such as XTOL or D-76, in their original sealed packaging can be expected to last several years.



              However, with age does come increased risks of issues.



              If the powder remains as fine grains and pours smoothly, then that is a good sign that there were no issues in storage.



              If it is clumpy, has uneven texture or colours, then treat with very high suspicions.




              Powders you suspect are more than a few years old should likely be tested before use with rolls of film you deem important.



              Extremely important rolls should probably always be processed in chemistry you've very recently tested with less important rolls. Film and chemistry is cheap, once in a lifetime shots aren't.




              • The older tins of developer are typically considered totally shelf stable if they're not damaged, and are potentially good for decades.

              • The newer foil packets are apparently more prone to spoilage, and may quietly fail after only a few years with poor visual indication.

              • Stock solution made from older powders can fail faster than normal due to being more oxidized than expected. In general it is good to avoid letting mixed stock solution sit too long, but aim to use up older chemistry sooner rather than later.

              In general it is good to treat all chemistry with some suspicion and care, and increase your suspicions as it ages.






              share|improve this answer

























                3












                3








                3







                The unmixed powders, such as XTOL or D-76, in their original sealed packaging can be expected to last several years.



                However, with age does come increased risks of issues.



                If the powder remains as fine grains and pours smoothly, then that is a good sign that there were no issues in storage.



                If it is clumpy, has uneven texture or colours, then treat with very high suspicions.




                Powders you suspect are more than a few years old should likely be tested before use with rolls of film you deem important.



                Extremely important rolls should probably always be processed in chemistry you've very recently tested with less important rolls. Film and chemistry is cheap, once in a lifetime shots aren't.




                • The older tins of developer are typically considered totally shelf stable if they're not damaged, and are potentially good for decades.

                • The newer foil packets are apparently more prone to spoilage, and may quietly fail after only a few years with poor visual indication.

                • Stock solution made from older powders can fail faster than normal due to being more oxidized than expected. In general it is good to avoid letting mixed stock solution sit too long, but aim to use up older chemistry sooner rather than later.

                In general it is good to treat all chemistry with some suspicion and care, and increase your suspicions as it ages.






                share|improve this answer













                The unmixed powders, such as XTOL or D-76, in their original sealed packaging can be expected to last several years.



                However, with age does come increased risks of issues.



                If the powder remains as fine grains and pours smoothly, then that is a good sign that there were no issues in storage.



                If it is clumpy, has uneven texture or colours, then treat with very high suspicions.




                Powders you suspect are more than a few years old should likely be tested before use with rolls of film you deem important.



                Extremely important rolls should probably always be processed in chemistry you've very recently tested with less important rolls. Film and chemistry is cheap, once in a lifetime shots aren't.




                • The older tins of developer are typically considered totally shelf stable if they're not damaged, and are potentially good for decades.

                • The newer foil packets are apparently more prone to spoilage, and may quietly fail after only a few years with poor visual indication.

                • Stock solution made from older powders can fail faster than normal due to being more oxidized than expected. In general it is good to avoid letting mixed stock solution sit too long, but aim to use up older chemistry sooner rather than later.

                In general it is good to treat all chemistry with some suspicion and care, and increase your suspicions as it ages.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered May 23 at 16:05









                TheLucklessTheLuckless

                1,54327




                1,54327



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Photography Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f108438%2fhow-long-do-xtol-and-d-76-last-unmixed%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    9lodivL1Ie
                    ZQPOre0ka0v,RI4d3y

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    RemoteApp sporadic failureWindows 2008 RemoteAPP client disconnects within a matter of minutesWhat is the minimum version of RDP supported by Server 2012 RDS?How to configure a Remoteapp server to increase stabilityMicrosoft RemoteApp Active SessionRDWeb TS connection broken for some users post RemoteApp certificate changeRemote Desktop Licensing, RemoteAPPRDS 2012 R2 some users are not able to logon after changed date and time on Connection BrokersWhat happens during Remote Desktop logon, and is there any logging?After installing RDS on WinServer 2016 I still can only connect with two users?RD Connection via RDGW to Session host is not connecting

                    Vilaño, A Laracha Índice Patrimonio | Lugares e parroquias | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación43°14′52″N 8°36′03″O / 43.24775, -8.60070

                    Cegueira Índice Epidemioloxía | Deficiencia visual | Tipos de cegueira | Principais causas de cegueira | Tratamento | Técnicas de adaptación e axudas | Vida dos cegos | Primeiros auxilios | Crenzas respecto das persoas cegas | Crenzas das persoas cegas | O neno deficiente visual | Aspectos psicolóxicos da cegueira | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación54.054.154.436928256blindnessDicionario da Real Academia GalegaPortal das Palabras"International Standards: Visual Standards — Aspects and Ranges of Vision Loss with Emphasis on Population Surveys.""Visual impairment and blindness""Presentan un plan para previr a cegueira"o orixinalACCDV Associació Catalana de Cecs i Disminuïts Visuals - PMFTrachoma"Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis"1844137110.1056/NEJMoa0802268Cans guía - os mellores amigos dos cegosArquivadoEscola de cans guía para cegos en Mortágua, PortugalArquivado"Tecnología para ciegos y deficientes visuales. Recopilación de recursos gratuitos en la Red""Colorino""‘COL.diesis’, escuchar los sonidos del color""COL.diesis: Transforming Colour into Melody and Implementing the Result in a Colour Sensor Device"o orixinal"Sistema de desarrollo de sinestesia color-sonido para invidentes utilizando un protocolo de audio""Enseñanza táctil - geometría y color. Juegos didácticos para niños ciegos y videntes""Sistema Constanz"L'ocupació laboral dels cecs a l'Estat espanyol està pràcticament equiparada a la de les persones amb visió, entrevista amb Pedro ZuritaONCE (Organización Nacional de Cegos de España)Prevención da cegueiraDescrición de deficiencias visuais (Disc@pnet)Braillín, un boneco atractivo para calquera neno, con ou sen discapacidade, que permite familiarizarse co sistema de escritura e lectura brailleAxudas Técnicas36838ID00897494007150-90057129528256DOID:1432HP:0000618D001766C10.597.751.941.162C97109C0155020