How to hide an urban landmark?Urban Aquatic SanitationUrban cohabitation of dragons and non-dragonsUrban Planning in 3-DimensionsHow can my large, urban trophy float?How to hide an underground city?Urban environment in post-apocalyptic settingIterative urban design rules?How to “hide” the effects of battle between supernaturalsUrban centers for octopusesHow to hide rifle during medieval town entrance inspection?

How long would it take to cross the Channel in 1890's?

Why tighten down in a criss-cross pattern?

Should I submit Original or copy of my passport to canadian embassy?

Did the CIA blow up a Siberian pipeline in 1982?

Prime sieve in Python

Methodology: Writing unit tests for another developer

Why do all the teams that I have worked with always finish a sprint without completion of all the stories?

Can White Castle?

Do I have any obligations to my PhD supervisor's requests after I have graduated?

Has there been any indication at all that further negotiation between the UK and EU is possible?

RandomInteger with equal number of 1 and -1

How did Gollum enter Moria?

Confusion over 220 and 230 volt outlets

Dates on degrees don’t make sense – will people care?

Is declining an undergraduate award which causes me discomfort appropriate?

How can you guarantee that you won't change/quit job after just couple of months?

CircuiTikZ: Start ground relative to the closest component

Why don't countries like Japan just print more money?

Designing a magic-compatible polearm

What does it mean to not be able to take the derivative of a function multiple times?

Can “does” be contracted?

When to remove insignificant variables?

If the Dragon's Breath spell is cast on a familiar, does it use the wizard's DC or familiar's DC?

What is the origin of Scooby-Doo's name?



How to hide an urban landmark?


Urban Aquatic SanitationUrban cohabitation of dragons and non-dragonsUrban Planning in 3-DimensionsHow can my large, urban trophy float?How to hide an underground city?Urban environment in post-apocalyptic settingIterative urban design rules?How to “hide” the effects of battle between supernaturalsUrban centers for octopusesHow to hide rifle during medieval town entrance inspection?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








14












$begingroup$


Picture an alternative history Second World War Paris.



The Third Reich must destroy the Notre-Dame de Paris, and the inhabitants must prevent this.



The French do not have access to anti-air weaponry (non-weaponry defences are permitted), the Third Reich has bombers.



Due to sabotage efforts and the primitive nature of maps in this alternate world, the Third Reich has no useful maps of the city. Instead, the pilots have been trained to recognise the cathedral based on tourist photography.



Can the citizenry, together with help from the Allies, prevent the bombers from spotting the cathedral?



A week may pass before the first bombers arrive, and anti-air weaponry will be available within two weeks of the first arrivals.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    $endgroup$
    – L.Dutch
    Jun 6 at 12:45

















14












$begingroup$


Picture an alternative history Second World War Paris.



The Third Reich must destroy the Notre-Dame de Paris, and the inhabitants must prevent this.



The French do not have access to anti-air weaponry (non-weaponry defences are permitted), the Third Reich has bombers.



Due to sabotage efforts and the primitive nature of maps in this alternate world, the Third Reich has no useful maps of the city. Instead, the pilots have been trained to recognise the cathedral based on tourist photography.



Can the citizenry, together with help from the Allies, prevent the bombers from spotting the cathedral?



A week may pass before the first bombers arrive, and anti-air weaponry will be available within two weeks of the first arrivals.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    $endgroup$
    – L.Dutch
    Jun 6 at 12:45













14












14








14


4



$begingroup$


Picture an alternative history Second World War Paris.



The Third Reich must destroy the Notre-Dame de Paris, and the inhabitants must prevent this.



The French do not have access to anti-air weaponry (non-weaponry defences are permitted), the Third Reich has bombers.



Due to sabotage efforts and the primitive nature of maps in this alternate world, the Third Reich has no useful maps of the city. Instead, the pilots have been trained to recognise the cathedral based on tourist photography.



Can the citizenry, together with help from the Allies, prevent the bombers from spotting the cathedral?



A week may pass before the first bombers arrive, and anti-air weaponry will be available within two weeks of the first arrivals.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Picture an alternative history Second World War Paris.



The Third Reich must destroy the Notre-Dame de Paris, and the inhabitants must prevent this.



The French do not have access to anti-air weaponry (non-weaponry defences are permitted), the Third Reich has bombers.



Due to sabotage efforts and the primitive nature of maps in this alternate world, the Third Reich has no useful maps of the city. Instead, the pilots have been trained to recognise the cathedral based on tourist photography.



Can the citizenry, together with help from the Allies, prevent the bombers from spotting the cathedral?



A week may pass before the first bombers arrive, and anti-air weaponry will be available within two weeks of the first arrivals.







cities military-defense concealment






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jun 6 at 6:38







A Lambent Eye

















asked Jun 4 at 8:56









A Lambent EyeA Lambent Eye

2,9981554




2,9981554











  • $begingroup$
    Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    $endgroup$
    – L.Dutch
    Jun 6 at 12:45
















  • $begingroup$
    Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    $endgroup$
    – L.Dutch
    Jun 6 at 12:45















$begingroup$
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
$endgroup$
– L.Dutch
Jun 6 at 12:45




$begingroup$
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
$endgroup$
– L.Dutch
Jun 6 at 12:45










9 Answers
9






active

oldest

votes


















77












$begingroup$

During WWII the city of Alexandria, in Egypt, was under menace of being bombed by the German bombers.



Since it was known that the bombing would have taken place overnight, it was decided to build in the desert an exact replica of Alexandria's light pattern, and enforce a strict curfew in the real city.



When the German bombers spotted the city lights, they decided that their instruments were giving the wrong reading, and successfully bombed the dunes. (source)



You can use a similar approach. Build a decoy in an expendable location.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    This also happened in Britain during the Blitz: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starfish_site
    $endgroup$
    – Kyyshak
    Jun 4 at 11:07






  • 40




    $begingroup$
    The bombing had to be overnight because of the anti-aircraft and air defense. Without this threat, the luftwaffe had bombed in daylight.
    $endgroup$
    – Rekesoft
    Jun 4 at 14:02






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Sudix, added the source in my edit
    $endgroup$
    – L.Dutch
    Jun 5 at 10:26






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    In a daylight raid the Luftwaffe would deploy dive bombers like the Stuka which are a. far more accurate and B. get so close that a light pattern won't disguise the building.
    $endgroup$
    – Borgh
    Jun 5 at 11:05






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    My grandfather, having been a soldier on the German side, told me when I was a little kid how they would build replicas of installations (maybe even entire small villages) out of cardboard, slightly off the track and in a harmless location. The real location would be camouflaged (paint, nets, foliage, etc.) Result: cardboard blown to smithereens. Seems to have worked on both sides :-) (He absolutely loved model trains with all the attending model scenery, which led to that discussion.)
    $endgroup$
    – fr13d
    Jun 6 at 10:01


















29












$begingroup$

As described, the French lose



Bridging the lack of maps like lightning



Ok, we have pilots that have no suitable airmap. What do they do? They launch some planes and start to map the city at once. As there is no anti-air available for the French, they can fly over the city and make photos. How? Because Paris is well within the 2000 km range of the Germans Ardo AR 235 even if they would launch their recon Aircrafts in eastern Prussia! Assuming they launch in Cologne 400 km away, the French have not one week but 30 minutes before the first recon-bomber is over Notre Dame and will start to map the area. After two hours of uninterrupted photography (again, no anti-air), it turns around and lands 30 minutes later. Two hours after the landing, the High Command is not only in possession of aerial photos of all of Paris, they also are just hours away from having the best map of Paris that ever existed, showing the exact location of Notre Dame and any attempt to cover it up. Making a rough map with the river and the location of all the churches is a manner of hours now. How do they look? Well, this is a REAL aerial photo of 1943:



Paris, Iles de Notre Dame, 1943



The next morning the air bombing can and will start, six days ahead of the plans of the Parisians, no longer stopped by lacking maps.



The Anti Air vulnerability




"A week may pass before the first bombers arrive, and anti-air weaponry will be available within two weeks of the first arrivals." - OP




As established already, the one week time to prepare the defense is a vast overestimation by the French and only feasible if the Luftwaffe has some odd lack of bombs available and needs to reroute or acquire extra bombs from other battlefields to crush Paris. Anyway, the Luftwaffe has total air dominance for two to three weeks.



Without an anti-aircraft supplement in place, now there is little to nothing the French can do between Ardo's taking photos and mapping the city and dropping occasional bombs. With the lack of any air defense, once the bombers come, there is nothing to keep the bombers away from the town and use daylight to aid in their bombing. As a result, the bombers come in broad daylight and can use the Seine and other buildings alone to estimate where to bomb to hit the one building they are interested in. See the large park north (Les Jardines des Halles) and the block of houses next to the park (Jardin des Plantes) SE? Notre Dame is where a line south from the park's east side would meet the elongation of the north wall of the university. It's in the elongation of the eastern island's edge between the first and second bridge on the second. Making a good aerial description of the target area is trivial once the photos were made.



Or they could just go to indiscriminate bombing of the inner city islands, leveling everything: Even the most useless map made from tourist photos shows that the cathedral stands on the south-eastern corner of an island, and bombing the whole island into smithereens would surely also hit that area. Hell, even with just tourist guides to guide the pilots, they might fathom a simple map: the guides and history books tell of other related landmarks like the smaller Saint Chapelle (yellow) 440 meters to the East-North-East, right next to the Palais de la Justice (green). And that Notre Dame is directly next to the huge complex of the Hôtel-Dieu de Paris (blue).



Other landmarks outlined to locate the landmark



And here with more area around to show how distinct the area is:



Aerial Photography



Aerial photo extent of 1943



Disguising or protecting Notre Dame is not an option anymore at this point.



Flipping the Eagle



Having no chance to cover up their Lady, the French have only one option left in the short hours: Deny their enemy the victory of destroying the church by evacuating everything from it they can and then destroying it themselves. There is no chance they can hide or protect an area about 1000 by 300 meters that is - conveniently for air attacks - right in the middle of a river.



Short of leveling the whole island and filling in the river, nothing can permanently disguise the position of Notre Dame. And nothing short of burning Paris to the ground can temporarily cover the whole city in so much smoke that it blocks aerial photography.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Nah, there is one technicality with which the french could win this. OP said that THE FRENCH don't have anti-air, but get help from the allies. Aka. Paris has a constant patrol of British/US interceptor aircraft
    $endgroup$
    – Hobbamok
    Jun 5 at 12:03







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Hobbamok "A week may pass before the first bombers arrive, [a vast miscalculation of the French] and anti-air weaponry will be available within two weeks of the first arrivals." - so about 3 weeks of total air domination of the Luftwaffe
    $endgroup$
    – Trish
    Jun 5 at 12:13










  • $begingroup$
    I'm banking on fighters not counting as anti-air weaponry. But again, it's a technicality, and if it doesn't count your answer is the result
    $endgroup$
    – Hobbamok
    Jun 5 at 12:16






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Hobbamok The typical French Caudron C.714 had a service ceiling of 9100 m - the Ardo could just coast along 900 meters over them and outfly them. the Dewoitine D.520C.1 could reach the Ardo's ceiling, but the Ardo was still faster...
    $endgroup$
    – Trish
    Jun 5 at 12:34











  • $begingroup$
    @Trish I wouldn't call C714 typical. The design was mostly a redesign of acrobatic planes to fighters that didn't lead to a reasonable construction. Only Polish pilots decided to continue using it when the flaws of the construction were discovered (very soon all planes were formally grounded but Poles decided to fly them anyway as they had no better option at that time - other than staying idle on the ground).
    $endgroup$
    – Ister
    Jun 5 at 17:47



















15












$begingroup$

Bury the lady.



lady liberty and scaffolds
source



  1. Surround the building with protective scaffolds / drapes. Here Lady Liberty stands in for Notre Dame.


  2. Erect concrete walls around the entirety of the building in a ziggurat-type stepped terrace.


  3. Cover horizontal parts of ziggurat with dirt. Plant grass. Install bathrooms and a snack bar at the top.


  4. The citizenry can use this structure as a park while it stands. If bombers come they will see a park. If they bomb the park, the concrete bunker will protect the cathedral below.


  5. 150 years later, the cathedral is still underneath the ziggurat which was never taken down. There are windows to allow sunlight to shine down inside in long rays. People like their pyramid park, and they like their cathedral protected under it.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 6




    $begingroup$
    @MichaelSeifert Perfect for a waterslide ending in the river!
    $endgroup$
    – Willk
    Jun 4 at 16:04






  • 8




    $begingroup$
    Is it possible to build something of that nature in 1 week?
    $endgroup$
    – Nuclear Wang
    Jun 4 at 17:21






  • 9




    $begingroup$
    @NuclearWang It would be a miracle if something like that could be built in 1 year.
    $endgroup$
    – Shufflepants
    Jun 4 at 18:06






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @Shufflepants Frankly, it would be a wonder of the world and one of the truly great projects of humanity if it was done in a decade. The Great Pyramid of Khufu took about 20, but while it is half again as tall as The Ziggurat of Paris would have to be, its construction is also somewhat simpler, in that it doesn't need a Notre Dame-shaped cavity inside it.
    $endgroup$
    – Williham Totland
    Jun 4 at 19:40






  • 17




    $begingroup$
    If bombers come they will see a park I have to question that seeing this brand new pyramid isn't simply going to tip them off. E.g. "Where's this damned cathedral, ja? - I don't know, but say Manfred, what's this giant pyramid over there?"
    $endgroup$
    – AmiralPatate
    Jun 5 at 6:02



















11












$begingroup$

Hide the thing pilots could know where Notre Dame should be. The islands. Bomb operator didn't looked at maps. They looked at ground below them. So the pilot would go along the river and bombardier would open the hatch when he would spot the first island. So just cover one canal with fake buildings and create fake one earlier alongside river.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    what abotu the versy distinct buildings right next to Notre Dame?
    $endgroup$
    – Trish
    Jun 5 at 7:43










  • $begingroup$
    @Trish Right next are hosues. Which look from above just like any other houses. If you have in mind Louvre then, again, paint some roofs on the courtyard
    $endgroup$
    – SZCZERZO KŁY
    Jun 5 at 7:49










  • $begingroup$
    You are ways of: look at the aerial photo from 1943 I put in my answer. You are looking at a gathering of some of the largest houses in the area. Even filling in one of both of the canals won't make these large, coherent houses with large courtyards not stand out among the mostly tiny roofs in paris.
    $endgroup$
    – Trish
    Jun 5 at 7:56










  • $begingroup$
    Heck, even the mere existence of the Louvre and historical texts are a dead giveaway to the location of the cathedral island.
    $endgroup$
    – Trish
    Jun 5 at 7:59










  • $begingroup$
    That's a great idea for a pilot - let's go the longest possible way to give as much time for AA guns to shoot as possible. German is to the RIGHT. Going from left to use Champs-Élysées as a navigation point would expose the planes to unnecessary fire.
    $endgroup$
    – SZCZERZO KŁY
    Jun 5 at 8:14


















8












$begingroup$

Cause a great fire and use the smoke to obscure the target.



Potential problems with this strategy would be:



  • A local cloud of smoke would be a dead giveaway of the cathedrals location

  • A city-wide cloud would be very difficult to maintain


  • Uncontrolled fire could cause the cathedral to be harmed

  • The weather may cause the smoke to be ineffective

  • A great fire requires great fuel





share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I also wonder if assuming enough manpower can be drafted it might be possible to construct a decoy cathedral elsewhere, doesn't need to even be all that detailed as it's trying to fool pilots that are a thousand feet away or more. Something like wooden framing covered with cloth sheets painted to give the illusion of the architectural detail of the building could possibly work, sure a cathedral is a little larger but tactics like this have been used to create decoys of whole divisions of tanks and such to fool reconnaissance etc.
    $endgroup$
    – MttJocy
    Jun 4 at 9:56







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @MttJocy Creating a flimsy dummy cathedral like that could be feasible in a short time frame. Widening the river to accommodate a new big fake island that to put it on, not so much. The Germans might not have maps, but they will know that the cathedral is located in the middle of the river Seine.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael MacAskill
    Jun 5 at 3:54







  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Hmm, fire... Couldn't we use the cathedral itself for that ??
    $endgroup$
    – Hobbamok
    Jun 5 at 11:58










  • $begingroup$
    While requiring major effort, this is the only thing that will work of the yet mentioned ideas.
    $endgroup$
    – infinitezero
    Jun 5 at 12:15






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @MttJocy If you don't manage to hide to real cathedral, the Germans could just bomb both the real and the decoy. Or, if they pick one at random, they still have a 50% chance of hitting the real one. That is, if they can't distinguish between the real one and the decoy.
    $endgroup$
    – Abigail
    Jun 6 at 0:20


















5












$begingroup$

Strategically, it's highly unlikely that the Luftwaffe would want to bomb Notre Dame anyway. Landmarks offered pilots a critical advantage that is so obvious, it's in the name: They Mark the Land. With nothing to support actual location pinpointing, a key strategy in World War II was to spare certain parts of the city so they could find the more strategic parts of the city.



When the allies were bombing Munich, pilots and Bombadiers were under very strict orders to not bomb exactly four buildings in the central part of the city (at least one was a church). Through out the entire war, only one plane damaged the four buildings, and that was because these buildings were easily identified from the air, and configured in a square shape... If they remained standing, allied planes could approach Munich and use the four structures as a compass rose that guided them to the more important factories and infrastructure necessary to the war effort. Of the four buildings 3 escaped the war with no damage, and one only had minor damage when an allied plane flew too low and knocked the top of the spire to the ground. To give you an idea of the damage inflicted, Munich today is still uncovering unexploded WWII ordinances and the Palace of the Bavarian kings, which is one street over from the town center, is still being reconstructed to it's pre-war state... a project that is expected to conclude sometime around 2040!



Although I'm not sure on the matter, it's highly likely that Notre Dame's distinct architecture and central location would serve a similar purpose, allowing German Pilots to direction find there way to important targets.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    my points of choice to not bomb in Paris would be: Eiffel tower, Louvre, Arc de Triomphe - forming a triangle around the center. The Avenue de la grande Armee forms a good ENE axis in Paris, extendable by the Palais de Luxembourg into a trapezoid, the south-eastern corner formed by the compass-rose PdL.
    $endgroup$
    – Trish
    Jun 5 at 16:18






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Considering the Notre Dame is on one of the two island in the Seine, with the island themselves being pretty impressive landmarks, flattening the Notre Dame isn't a major loss as far as navigational landmarks go.
    $endgroup$
    – Abigail
    Jun 6 at 0:23


















4












$begingroup$

Since your entire premise is ridiculous [aka unsolveable] (especially the "no maps" with photography existent...) I'll save the cathedral with some technicality:




together with help from the Allies, prevent the bombers from spotting the cathedral?




ENHANCE




together with help from the Allies




And there you go.



No German bomber can even spot the cathedral (not even hit it), if you have British and US Interceptors swarming France 24/7 (like the beginning of '45).



Yes, ground-support Anti Air would be nice, but the french can't provide that apparently so the fighters alone would have to do (and will do, assuming late-war setups).



If that counts as "anti air available", then the cathedral is 100% lost, as @Trish laid out with much detail.
All the other stuff other people mention here won't work, because they assume either night-raids or super-high-flying bombers, neither of which will be happening here.



If by "no maps" you mean that Germany magically can't produce anything maplike, they'll just level Paris and call it a day, they'll hit the cathedral eventually.
Or use StuKas, with which they can hit it with bare eyes.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    3












    $begingroup$

    Similar to SZCZERZO KŁY: While these events were occurring in Paris, Boeing built a fake neighborhood on the roof of an airplane plant.



    https://99percentinvisible.org/article/prop-town-fake-rooftop-suburb-hid-whole-wwii-airplane-factory/



    This neighborhood (made by a Hollywood set designer) was half the size of Notre Dame's island, but you'd only need to cover the cathedral and some of its surroundings, which could be much smaller.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      So the bomber crews don't find ANY cathedral the first time, go back. The commander concludes that it's hidden and Germany simply levels Paris. [But nice Idea and example]
      $endgroup$
      – Hobbamok
      Jun 5 at 12:13







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I think you'd also have to create a fake cathedral on the other island, and ideally cover the river to the south of the real island with more fake buildings.
      $endgroup$
      – Robin Bennett
      Jun 5 at 13:01






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @RobinBennett Problem there is that the other island is dangerously close given the inaccuracy of unguided air dropped bombs, ran into a similar issues with my own thinking that you would need to create a decoy as without one any attempt to obscure the target is going to look suspicious. But yeah ideally making full use of scenario fulfilment by giving them a target so they don't look too close at anything else going on nearby as they are too focused on the mission would make sense. A flimsy decoy of a building is pretty easy but rivers not so much so might have to just risk it.
      $endgroup$
      – MttJocy
      Jun 7 at 9:38



















    2












    $begingroup$

    The french (we :)) already did it during the first world war.



    At the end of WWI, to avoid bombardment on Paris, the french did a "fake Paris" in countryside, reproducting the great landmarks of the city and mimicking the night life of Paris.



    It was ALL about the lights on grounds, because bombers were coming at night to avoid anti air defenses. I don't think this perfectly answer your question because of this, but maybe it could give you some cool ideas.



    Here's a english link for more informations :
    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/8879053/Second-Paris-built-towards-end-of-First-World-War-to-fool-Germans.html






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      "One of the reasons for the high number of casualties was because bombing raids were a relative novelty in Britain, with many civilians crowding together to watch them."....
      $endgroup$
      – Muuski
      Jun 6 at 14:16






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Just like the top-voted answer about the Egyptian fake city: This wouldn't help at all, since without AA, the bombing would certainly NOT be conducted at night. Just like the late-war American bombers flew in daylight
      $endgroup$
      – Hobbamok
      Jun 6 at 17:02










    • $begingroup$
      maybe it's very cloudy
      $endgroup$
      – GlorfSf
      Jun 7 at 7:21










    • $begingroup$
      very cloudy and bad weather won't hold up for 3 consecutive weeks.
      $endgroup$
      – Trish
      Jun 7 at 10:44










    • $begingroup$
      @Trish Maybe not in Paris. But Seattle, from what I've heard....
      $endgroup$
      – Shawn V. Wilson
      Jun 8 at 15:44











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "579"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f148292%2fhow-to-hide-an-urban-landmark%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    9 Answers
    9






    active

    oldest

    votes








    9 Answers
    9






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    77












    $begingroup$

    During WWII the city of Alexandria, in Egypt, was under menace of being bombed by the German bombers.



    Since it was known that the bombing would have taken place overnight, it was decided to build in the desert an exact replica of Alexandria's light pattern, and enforce a strict curfew in the real city.



    When the German bombers spotted the city lights, they decided that their instruments were giving the wrong reading, and successfully bombed the dunes. (source)



    You can use a similar approach. Build a decoy in an expendable location.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 5




      $begingroup$
      This also happened in Britain during the Blitz: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starfish_site
      $endgroup$
      – Kyyshak
      Jun 4 at 11:07






    • 40




      $begingroup$
      The bombing had to be overnight because of the anti-aircraft and air defense. Without this threat, the luftwaffe had bombed in daylight.
      $endgroup$
      – Rekesoft
      Jun 4 at 14:02






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @Sudix, added the source in my edit
      $endgroup$
      – L.Dutch
      Jun 5 at 10:26






    • 4




      $begingroup$
      In a daylight raid the Luftwaffe would deploy dive bombers like the Stuka which are a. far more accurate and B. get so close that a light pattern won't disguise the building.
      $endgroup$
      – Borgh
      Jun 5 at 11:05






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      My grandfather, having been a soldier on the German side, told me when I was a little kid how they would build replicas of installations (maybe even entire small villages) out of cardboard, slightly off the track and in a harmless location. The real location would be camouflaged (paint, nets, foliage, etc.) Result: cardboard blown to smithereens. Seems to have worked on both sides :-) (He absolutely loved model trains with all the attending model scenery, which led to that discussion.)
      $endgroup$
      – fr13d
      Jun 6 at 10:01















    77












    $begingroup$

    During WWII the city of Alexandria, in Egypt, was under menace of being bombed by the German bombers.



    Since it was known that the bombing would have taken place overnight, it was decided to build in the desert an exact replica of Alexandria's light pattern, and enforce a strict curfew in the real city.



    When the German bombers spotted the city lights, they decided that their instruments were giving the wrong reading, and successfully bombed the dunes. (source)



    You can use a similar approach. Build a decoy in an expendable location.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 5




      $begingroup$
      This also happened in Britain during the Blitz: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starfish_site
      $endgroup$
      – Kyyshak
      Jun 4 at 11:07






    • 40




      $begingroup$
      The bombing had to be overnight because of the anti-aircraft and air defense. Without this threat, the luftwaffe had bombed in daylight.
      $endgroup$
      – Rekesoft
      Jun 4 at 14:02






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @Sudix, added the source in my edit
      $endgroup$
      – L.Dutch
      Jun 5 at 10:26






    • 4




      $begingroup$
      In a daylight raid the Luftwaffe would deploy dive bombers like the Stuka which are a. far more accurate and B. get so close that a light pattern won't disguise the building.
      $endgroup$
      – Borgh
      Jun 5 at 11:05






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      My grandfather, having been a soldier on the German side, told me when I was a little kid how they would build replicas of installations (maybe even entire small villages) out of cardboard, slightly off the track and in a harmless location. The real location would be camouflaged (paint, nets, foliage, etc.) Result: cardboard blown to smithereens. Seems to have worked on both sides :-) (He absolutely loved model trains with all the attending model scenery, which led to that discussion.)
      $endgroup$
      – fr13d
      Jun 6 at 10:01













    77












    77








    77





    $begingroup$

    During WWII the city of Alexandria, in Egypt, was under menace of being bombed by the German bombers.



    Since it was known that the bombing would have taken place overnight, it was decided to build in the desert an exact replica of Alexandria's light pattern, and enforce a strict curfew in the real city.



    When the German bombers spotted the city lights, they decided that their instruments were giving the wrong reading, and successfully bombed the dunes. (source)



    You can use a similar approach. Build a decoy in an expendable location.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    During WWII the city of Alexandria, in Egypt, was under menace of being bombed by the German bombers.



    Since it was known that the bombing would have taken place overnight, it was decided to build in the desert an exact replica of Alexandria's light pattern, and enforce a strict curfew in the real city.



    When the German bombers spotted the city lights, they decided that their instruments were giving the wrong reading, and successfully bombed the dunes. (source)



    You can use a similar approach. Build a decoy in an expendable location.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Jun 5 at 10:26

























    answered Jun 4 at 9:30









    L.DutchL.Dutch

    99.3k31234478




    99.3k31234478







    • 5




      $begingroup$
      This also happened in Britain during the Blitz: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starfish_site
      $endgroup$
      – Kyyshak
      Jun 4 at 11:07






    • 40




      $begingroup$
      The bombing had to be overnight because of the anti-aircraft and air defense. Without this threat, the luftwaffe had bombed in daylight.
      $endgroup$
      – Rekesoft
      Jun 4 at 14:02






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @Sudix, added the source in my edit
      $endgroup$
      – L.Dutch
      Jun 5 at 10:26






    • 4




      $begingroup$
      In a daylight raid the Luftwaffe would deploy dive bombers like the Stuka which are a. far more accurate and B. get so close that a light pattern won't disguise the building.
      $endgroup$
      – Borgh
      Jun 5 at 11:05






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      My grandfather, having been a soldier on the German side, told me when I was a little kid how they would build replicas of installations (maybe even entire small villages) out of cardboard, slightly off the track and in a harmless location. The real location would be camouflaged (paint, nets, foliage, etc.) Result: cardboard blown to smithereens. Seems to have worked on both sides :-) (He absolutely loved model trains with all the attending model scenery, which led to that discussion.)
      $endgroup$
      – fr13d
      Jun 6 at 10:01












    • 5




      $begingroup$
      This also happened in Britain during the Blitz: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starfish_site
      $endgroup$
      – Kyyshak
      Jun 4 at 11:07






    • 40




      $begingroup$
      The bombing had to be overnight because of the anti-aircraft and air defense. Without this threat, the luftwaffe had bombed in daylight.
      $endgroup$
      – Rekesoft
      Jun 4 at 14:02






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @Sudix, added the source in my edit
      $endgroup$
      – L.Dutch
      Jun 5 at 10:26






    • 4




      $begingroup$
      In a daylight raid the Luftwaffe would deploy dive bombers like the Stuka which are a. far more accurate and B. get so close that a light pattern won't disguise the building.
      $endgroup$
      – Borgh
      Jun 5 at 11:05






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      My grandfather, having been a soldier on the German side, told me when I was a little kid how they would build replicas of installations (maybe even entire small villages) out of cardboard, slightly off the track and in a harmless location. The real location would be camouflaged (paint, nets, foliage, etc.) Result: cardboard blown to smithereens. Seems to have worked on both sides :-) (He absolutely loved model trains with all the attending model scenery, which led to that discussion.)
      $endgroup$
      – fr13d
      Jun 6 at 10:01







    5




    5




    $begingroup$
    This also happened in Britain during the Blitz: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starfish_site
    $endgroup$
    – Kyyshak
    Jun 4 at 11:07




    $begingroup$
    This also happened in Britain during the Blitz: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starfish_site
    $endgroup$
    – Kyyshak
    Jun 4 at 11:07




    40




    40




    $begingroup$
    The bombing had to be overnight because of the anti-aircraft and air defense. Without this threat, the luftwaffe had bombed in daylight.
    $endgroup$
    – Rekesoft
    Jun 4 at 14:02




    $begingroup$
    The bombing had to be overnight because of the anti-aircraft and air defense. Without this threat, the luftwaffe had bombed in daylight.
    $endgroup$
    – Rekesoft
    Jun 4 at 14:02




    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    @Sudix, added the source in my edit
    $endgroup$
    – L.Dutch
    Jun 5 at 10:26




    $begingroup$
    @Sudix, added the source in my edit
    $endgroup$
    – L.Dutch
    Jun 5 at 10:26




    4




    4




    $begingroup$
    In a daylight raid the Luftwaffe would deploy dive bombers like the Stuka which are a. far more accurate and B. get so close that a light pattern won't disguise the building.
    $endgroup$
    – Borgh
    Jun 5 at 11:05




    $begingroup$
    In a daylight raid the Luftwaffe would deploy dive bombers like the Stuka which are a. far more accurate and B. get so close that a light pattern won't disguise the building.
    $endgroup$
    – Borgh
    Jun 5 at 11:05




    3




    3




    $begingroup$
    My grandfather, having been a soldier on the German side, told me when I was a little kid how they would build replicas of installations (maybe even entire small villages) out of cardboard, slightly off the track and in a harmless location. The real location would be camouflaged (paint, nets, foliage, etc.) Result: cardboard blown to smithereens. Seems to have worked on both sides :-) (He absolutely loved model trains with all the attending model scenery, which led to that discussion.)
    $endgroup$
    – fr13d
    Jun 6 at 10:01




    $begingroup$
    My grandfather, having been a soldier on the German side, told me when I was a little kid how they would build replicas of installations (maybe even entire small villages) out of cardboard, slightly off the track and in a harmless location. The real location would be camouflaged (paint, nets, foliage, etc.) Result: cardboard blown to smithereens. Seems to have worked on both sides :-) (He absolutely loved model trains with all the attending model scenery, which led to that discussion.)
    $endgroup$
    – fr13d
    Jun 6 at 10:01













    29












    $begingroup$

    As described, the French lose



    Bridging the lack of maps like lightning



    Ok, we have pilots that have no suitable airmap. What do they do? They launch some planes and start to map the city at once. As there is no anti-air available for the French, they can fly over the city and make photos. How? Because Paris is well within the 2000 km range of the Germans Ardo AR 235 even if they would launch their recon Aircrafts in eastern Prussia! Assuming they launch in Cologne 400 km away, the French have not one week but 30 minutes before the first recon-bomber is over Notre Dame and will start to map the area. After two hours of uninterrupted photography (again, no anti-air), it turns around and lands 30 minutes later. Two hours after the landing, the High Command is not only in possession of aerial photos of all of Paris, they also are just hours away from having the best map of Paris that ever existed, showing the exact location of Notre Dame and any attempt to cover it up. Making a rough map with the river and the location of all the churches is a manner of hours now. How do they look? Well, this is a REAL aerial photo of 1943:



    Paris, Iles de Notre Dame, 1943



    The next morning the air bombing can and will start, six days ahead of the plans of the Parisians, no longer stopped by lacking maps.



    The Anti Air vulnerability




    "A week may pass before the first bombers arrive, and anti-air weaponry will be available within two weeks of the first arrivals." - OP




    As established already, the one week time to prepare the defense is a vast overestimation by the French and only feasible if the Luftwaffe has some odd lack of bombs available and needs to reroute or acquire extra bombs from other battlefields to crush Paris. Anyway, the Luftwaffe has total air dominance for two to three weeks.



    Without an anti-aircraft supplement in place, now there is little to nothing the French can do between Ardo's taking photos and mapping the city and dropping occasional bombs. With the lack of any air defense, once the bombers come, there is nothing to keep the bombers away from the town and use daylight to aid in their bombing. As a result, the bombers come in broad daylight and can use the Seine and other buildings alone to estimate where to bomb to hit the one building they are interested in. See the large park north (Les Jardines des Halles) and the block of houses next to the park (Jardin des Plantes) SE? Notre Dame is where a line south from the park's east side would meet the elongation of the north wall of the university. It's in the elongation of the eastern island's edge between the first and second bridge on the second. Making a good aerial description of the target area is trivial once the photos were made.



    Or they could just go to indiscriminate bombing of the inner city islands, leveling everything: Even the most useless map made from tourist photos shows that the cathedral stands on the south-eastern corner of an island, and bombing the whole island into smithereens would surely also hit that area. Hell, even with just tourist guides to guide the pilots, they might fathom a simple map: the guides and history books tell of other related landmarks like the smaller Saint Chapelle (yellow) 440 meters to the East-North-East, right next to the Palais de la Justice (green). And that Notre Dame is directly next to the huge complex of the Hôtel-Dieu de Paris (blue).



    Other landmarks outlined to locate the landmark



    And here with more area around to show how distinct the area is:



    Aerial Photography



    Aerial photo extent of 1943



    Disguising or protecting Notre Dame is not an option anymore at this point.



    Flipping the Eagle



    Having no chance to cover up their Lady, the French have only one option left in the short hours: Deny their enemy the victory of destroying the church by evacuating everything from it they can and then destroying it themselves. There is no chance they can hide or protect an area about 1000 by 300 meters that is - conveniently for air attacks - right in the middle of a river.



    Short of leveling the whole island and filling in the river, nothing can permanently disguise the position of Notre Dame. And nothing short of burning Paris to the ground can temporarily cover the whole city in so much smoke that it blocks aerial photography.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Nah, there is one technicality with which the french could win this. OP said that THE FRENCH don't have anti-air, but get help from the allies. Aka. Paris has a constant patrol of British/US interceptor aircraft
      $endgroup$
      – Hobbamok
      Jun 5 at 12:03







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Hobbamok "A week may pass before the first bombers arrive, [a vast miscalculation of the French] and anti-air weaponry will be available within two weeks of the first arrivals." - so about 3 weeks of total air domination of the Luftwaffe
      $endgroup$
      – Trish
      Jun 5 at 12:13










    • $begingroup$
      I'm banking on fighters not counting as anti-air weaponry. But again, it's a technicality, and if it doesn't count your answer is the result
      $endgroup$
      – Hobbamok
      Jun 5 at 12:16






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Hobbamok The typical French Caudron C.714 had a service ceiling of 9100 m - the Ardo could just coast along 900 meters over them and outfly them. the Dewoitine D.520C.1 could reach the Ardo's ceiling, but the Ardo was still faster...
      $endgroup$
      – Trish
      Jun 5 at 12:34











    • $begingroup$
      @Trish I wouldn't call C714 typical. The design was mostly a redesign of acrobatic planes to fighters that didn't lead to a reasonable construction. Only Polish pilots decided to continue using it when the flaws of the construction were discovered (very soon all planes were formally grounded but Poles decided to fly them anyway as they had no better option at that time - other than staying idle on the ground).
      $endgroup$
      – Ister
      Jun 5 at 17:47
















    29












    $begingroup$

    As described, the French lose



    Bridging the lack of maps like lightning



    Ok, we have pilots that have no suitable airmap. What do they do? They launch some planes and start to map the city at once. As there is no anti-air available for the French, they can fly over the city and make photos. How? Because Paris is well within the 2000 km range of the Germans Ardo AR 235 even if they would launch their recon Aircrafts in eastern Prussia! Assuming they launch in Cologne 400 km away, the French have not one week but 30 minutes before the first recon-bomber is over Notre Dame and will start to map the area. After two hours of uninterrupted photography (again, no anti-air), it turns around and lands 30 minutes later. Two hours after the landing, the High Command is not only in possession of aerial photos of all of Paris, they also are just hours away from having the best map of Paris that ever existed, showing the exact location of Notre Dame and any attempt to cover it up. Making a rough map with the river and the location of all the churches is a manner of hours now. How do they look? Well, this is a REAL aerial photo of 1943:



    Paris, Iles de Notre Dame, 1943



    The next morning the air bombing can and will start, six days ahead of the plans of the Parisians, no longer stopped by lacking maps.



    The Anti Air vulnerability




    "A week may pass before the first bombers arrive, and anti-air weaponry will be available within two weeks of the first arrivals." - OP




    As established already, the one week time to prepare the defense is a vast overestimation by the French and only feasible if the Luftwaffe has some odd lack of bombs available and needs to reroute or acquire extra bombs from other battlefields to crush Paris. Anyway, the Luftwaffe has total air dominance for two to three weeks.



    Without an anti-aircraft supplement in place, now there is little to nothing the French can do between Ardo's taking photos and mapping the city and dropping occasional bombs. With the lack of any air defense, once the bombers come, there is nothing to keep the bombers away from the town and use daylight to aid in their bombing. As a result, the bombers come in broad daylight and can use the Seine and other buildings alone to estimate where to bomb to hit the one building they are interested in. See the large park north (Les Jardines des Halles) and the block of houses next to the park (Jardin des Plantes) SE? Notre Dame is where a line south from the park's east side would meet the elongation of the north wall of the university. It's in the elongation of the eastern island's edge between the first and second bridge on the second. Making a good aerial description of the target area is trivial once the photos were made.



    Or they could just go to indiscriminate bombing of the inner city islands, leveling everything: Even the most useless map made from tourist photos shows that the cathedral stands on the south-eastern corner of an island, and bombing the whole island into smithereens would surely also hit that area. Hell, even with just tourist guides to guide the pilots, they might fathom a simple map: the guides and history books tell of other related landmarks like the smaller Saint Chapelle (yellow) 440 meters to the East-North-East, right next to the Palais de la Justice (green). And that Notre Dame is directly next to the huge complex of the Hôtel-Dieu de Paris (blue).



    Other landmarks outlined to locate the landmark



    And here with more area around to show how distinct the area is:



    Aerial Photography



    Aerial photo extent of 1943



    Disguising or protecting Notre Dame is not an option anymore at this point.



    Flipping the Eagle



    Having no chance to cover up their Lady, the French have only one option left in the short hours: Deny their enemy the victory of destroying the church by evacuating everything from it they can and then destroying it themselves. There is no chance they can hide or protect an area about 1000 by 300 meters that is - conveniently for air attacks - right in the middle of a river.



    Short of leveling the whole island and filling in the river, nothing can permanently disguise the position of Notre Dame. And nothing short of burning Paris to the ground can temporarily cover the whole city in so much smoke that it blocks aerial photography.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Nah, there is one technicality with which the french could win this. OP said that THE FRENCH don't have anti-air, but get help from the allies. Aka. Paris has a constant patrol of British/US interceptor aircraft
      $endgroup$
      – Hobbamok
      Jun 5 at 12:03







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Hobbamok "A week may pass before the first bombers arrive, [a vast miscalculation of the French] and anti-air weaponry will be available within two weeks of the first arrivals." - so about 3 weeks of total air domination of the Luftwaffe
      $endgroup$
      – Trish
      Jun 5 at 12:13










    • $begingroup$
      I'm banking on fighters not counting as anti-air weaponry. But again, it's a technicality, and if it doesn't count your answer is the result
      $endgroup$
      – Hobbamok
      Jun 5 at 12:16






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Hobbamok The typical French Caudron C.714 had a service ceiling of 9100 m - the Ardo could just coast along 900 meters over them and outfly them. the Dewoitine D.520C.1 could reach the Ardo's ceiling, but the Ardo was still faster...
      $endgroup$
      – Trish
      Jun 5 at 12:34











    • $begingroup$
      @Trish I wouldn't call C714 typical. The design was mostly a redesign of acrobatic planes to fighters that didn't lead to a reasonable construction. Only Polish pilots decided to continue using it when the flaws of the construction were discovered (very soon all planes were formally grounded but Poles decided to fly them anyway as they had no better option at that time - other than staying idle on the ground).
      $endgroup$
      – Ister
      Jun 5 at 17:47














    29












    29








    29





    $begingroup$

    As described, the French lose



    Bridging the lack of maps like lightning



    Ok, we have pilots that have no suitable airmap. What do they do? They launch some planes and start to map the city at once. As there is no anti-air available for the French, they can fly over the city and make photos. How? Because Paris is well within the 2000 km range of the Germans Ardo AR 235 even if they would launch their recon Aircrafts in eastern Prussia! Assuming they launch in Cologne 400 km away, the French have not one week but 30 minutes before the first recon-bomber is over Notre Dame and will start to map the area. After two hours of uninterrupted photography (again, no anti-air), it turns around and lands 30 minutes later. Two hours after the landing, the High Command is not only in possession of aerial photos of all of Paris, they also are just hours away from having the best map of Paris that ever existed, showing the exact location of Notre Dame and any attempt to cover it up. Making a rough map with the river and the location of all the churches is a manner of hours now. How do they look? Well, this is a REAL aerial photo of 1943:



    Paris, Iles de Notre Dame, 1943



    The next morning the air bombing can and will start, six days ahead of the plans of the Parisians, no longer stopped by lacking maps.



    The Anti Air vulnerability




    "A week may pass before the first bombers arrive, and anti-air weaponry will be available within two weeks of the first arrivals." - OP




    As established already, the one week time to prepare the defense is a vast overestimation by the French and only feasible if the Luftwaffe has some odd lack of bombs available and needs to reroute or acquire extra bombs from other battlefields to crush Paris. Anyway, the Luftwaffe has total air dominance for two to three weeks.



    Without an anti-aircraft supplement in place, now there is little to nothing the French can do between Ardo's taking photos and mapping the city and dropping occasional bombs. With the lack of any air defense, once the bombers come, there is nothing to keep the bombers away from the town and use daylight to aid in their bombing. As a result, the bombers come in broad daylight and can use the Seine and other buildings alone to estimate where to bomb to hit the one building they are interested in. See the large park north (Les Jardines des Halles) and the block of houses next to the park (Jardin des Plantes) SE? Notre Dame is where a line south from the park's east side would meet the elongation of the north wall of the university. It's in the elongation of the eastern island's edge between the first and second bridge on the second. Making a good aerial description of the target area is trivial once the photos were made.



    Or they could just go to indiscriminate bombing of the inner city islands, leveling everything: Even the most useless map made from tourist photos shows that the cathedral stands on the south-eastern corner of an island, and bombing the whole island into smithereens would surely also hit that area. Hell, even with just tourist guides to guide the pilots, they might fathom a simple map: the guides and history books tell of other related landmarks like the smaller Saint Chapelle (yellow) 440 meters to the East-North-East, right next to the Palais de la Justice (green). And that Notre Dame is directly next to the huge complex of the Hôtel-Dieu de Paris (blue).



    Other landmarks outlined to locate the landmark



    And here with more area around to show how distinct the area is:



    Aerial Photography



    Aerial photo extent of 1943



    Disguising or protecting Notre Dame is not an option anymore at this point.



    Flipping the Eagle



    Having no chance to cover up their Lady, the French have only one option left in the short hours: Deny their enemy the victory of destroying the church by evacuating everything from it they can and then destroying it themselves. There is no chance they can hide or protect an area about 1000 by 300 meters that is - conveniently for air attacks - right in the middle of a river.



    Short of leveling the whole island and filling in the river, nothing can permanently disguise the position of Notre Dame. And nothing short of burning Paris to the ground can temporarily cover the whole city in so much smoke that it blocks aerial photography.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    As described, the French lose



    Bridging the lack of maps like lightning



    Ok, we have pilots that have no suitable airmap. What do they do? They launch some planes and start to map the city at once. As there is no anti-air available for the French, they can fly over the city and make photos. How? Because Paris is well within the 2000 km range of the Germans Ardo AR 235 even if they would launch their recon Aircrafts in eastern Prussia! Assuming they launch in Cologne 400 km away, the French have not one week but 30 minutes before the first recon-bomber is over Notre Dame and will start to map the area. After two hours of uninterrupted photography (again, no anti-air), it turns around and lands 30 minutes later. Two hours after the landing, the High Command is not only in possession of aerial photos of all of Paris, they also are just hours away from having the best map of Paris that ever existed, showing the exact location of Notre Dame and any attempt to cover it up. Making a rough map with the river and the location of all the churches is a manner of hours now. How do they look? Well, this is a REAL aerial photo of 1943:



    Paris, Iles de Notre Dame, 1943



    The next morning the air bombing can and will start, six days ahead of the plans of the Parisians, no longer stopped by lacking maps.



    The Anti Air vulnerability




    "A week may pass before the first bombers arrive, and anti-air weaponry will be available within two weeks of the first arrivals." - OP




    As established already, the one week time to prepare the defense is a vast overestimation by the French and only feasible if the Luftwaffe has some odd lack of bombs available and needs to reroute or acquire extra bombs from other battlefields to crush Paris. Anyway, the Luftwaffe has total air dominance for two to three weeks.



    Without an anti-aircraft supplement in place, now there is little to nothing the French can do between Ardo's taking photos and mapping the city and dropping occasional bombs. With the lack of any air defense, once the bombers come, there is nothing to keep the bombers away from the town and use daylight to aid in their bombing. As a result, the bombers come in broad daylight and can use the Seine and other buildings alone to estimate where to bomb to hit the one building they are interested in. See the large park north (Les Jardines des Halles) and the block of houses next to the park (Jardin des Plantes) SE? Notre Dame is where a line south from the park's east side would meet the elongation of the north wall of the university. It's in the elongation of the eastern island's edge between the first and second bridge on the second. Making a good aerial description of the target area is trivial once the photos were made.



    Or they could just go to indiscriminate bombing of the inner city islands, leveling everything: Even the most useless map made from tourist photos shows that the cathedral stands on the south-eastern corner of an island, and bombing the whole island into smithereens would surely also hit that area. Hell, even with just tourist guides to guide the pilots, they might fathom a simple map: the guides and history books tell of other related landmarks like the smaller Saint Chapelle (yellow) 440 meters to the East-North-East, right next to the Palais de la Justice (green). And that Notre Dame is directly next to the huge complex of the Hôtel-Dieu de Paris (blue).



    Other landmarks outlined to locate the landmark



    And here with more area around to show how distinct the area is:



    Aerial Photography



    Aerial photo extent of 1943



    Disguising or protecting Notre Dame is not an option anymore at this point.



    Flipping the Eagle



    Having no chance to cover up their Lady, the French have only one option left in the short hours: Deny their enemy the victory of destroying the church by evacuating everything from it they can and then destroying it themselves. There is no chance they can hide or protect an area about 1000 by 300 meters that is - conveniently for air attacks - right in the middle of a river.



    Short of leveling the whole island and filling in the river, nothing can permanently disguise the position of Notre Dame. And nothing short of burning Paris to the ground can temporarily cover the whole city in so much smoke that it blocks aerial photography.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Jun 5 at 15:05









    Kat

    1947




    1947










    answered Jun 5 at 7:36









    TrishTrish

    4,5841330




    4,5841330











    • $begingroup$
      Nah, there is one technicality with which the french could win this. OP said that THE FRENCH don't have anti-air, but get help from the allies. Aka. Paris has a constant patrol of British/US interceptor aircraft
      $endgroup$
      – Hobbamok
      Jun 5 at 12:03







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Hobbamok "A week may pass before the first bombers arrive, [a vast miscalculation of the French] and anti-air weaponry will be available within two weeks of the first arrivals." - so about 3 weeks of total air domination of the Luftwaffe
      $endgroup$
      – Trish
      Jun 5 at 12:13










    • $begingroup$
      I'm banking on fighters not counting as anti-air weaponry. But again, it's a technicality, and if it doesn't count your answer is the result
      $endgroup$
      – Hobbamok
      Jun 5 at 12:16






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Hobbamok The typical French Caudron C.714 had a service ceiling of 9100 m - the Ardo could just coast along 900 meters over them and outfly them. the Dewoitine D.520C.1 could reach the Ardo's ceiling, but the Ardo was still faster...
      $endgroup$
      – Trish
      Jun 5 at 12:34











    • $begingroup$
      @Trish I wouldn't call C714 typical. The design was mostly a redesign of acrobatic planes to fighters that didn't lead to a reasonable construction. Only Polish pilots decided to continue using it when the flaws of the construction were discovered (very soon all planes were formally grounded but Poles decided to fly them anyway as they had no better option at that time - other than staying idle on the ground).
      $endgroup$
      – Ister
      Jun 5 at 17:47

















    • $begingroup$
      Nah, there is one technicality with which the french could win this. OP said that THE FRENCH don't have anti-air, but get help from the allies. Aka. Paris has a constant patrol of British/US interceptor aircraft
      $endgroup$
      – Hobbamok
      Jun 5 at 12:03







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Hobbamok "A week may pass before the first bombers arrive, [a vast miscalculation of the French] and anti-air weaponry will be available within two weeks of the first arrivals." - so about 3 weeks of total air domination of the Luftwaffe
      $endgroup$
      – Trish
      Jun 5 at 12:13










    • $begingroup$
      I'm banking on fighters not counting as anti-air weaponry. But again, it's a technicality, and if it doesn't count your answer is the result
      $endgroup$
      – Hobbamok
      Jun 5 at 12:16






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @Hobbamok The typical French Caudron C.714 had a service ceiling of 9100 m - the Ardo could just coast along 900 meters over them and outfly them. the Dewoitine D.520C.1 could reach the Ardo's ceiling, but the Ardo was still faster...
      $endgroup$
      – Trish
      Jun 5 at 12:34











    • $begingroup$
      @Trish I wouldn't call C714 typical. The design was mostly a redesign of acrobatic planes to fighters that didn't lead to a reasonable construction. Only Polish pilots decided to continue using it when the flaws of the construction were discovered (very soon all planes were formally grounded but Poles decided to fly them anyway as they had no better option at that time - other than staying idle on the ground).
      $endgroup$
      – Ister
      Jun 5 at 17:47
















    $begingroup$
    Nah, there is one technicality with which the french could win this. OP said that THE FRENCH don't have anti-air, but get help from the allies. Aka. Paris has a constant patrol of British/US interceptor aircraft
    $endgroup$
    – Hobbamok
    Jun 5 at 12:03





    $begingroup$
    Nah, there is one technicality with which the french could win this. OP said that THE FRENCH don't have anti-air, but get help from the allies. Aka. Paris has a constant patrol of British/US interceptor aircraft
    $endgroup$
    – Hobbamok
    Jun 5 at 12:03





    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    @Hobbamok "A week may pass before the first bombers arrive, [a vast miscalculation of the French] and anti-air weaponry will be available within two weeks of the first arrivals." - so about 3 weeks of total air domination of the Luftwaffe
    $endgroup$
    – Trish
    Jun 5 at 12:13




    $begingroup$
    @Hobbamok "A week may pass before the first bombers arrive, [a vast miscalculation of the French] and anti-air weaponry will be available within two weeks of the first arrivals." - so about 3 weeks of total air domination of the Luftwaffe
    $endgroup$
    – Trish
    Jun 5 at 12:13












    $begingroup$
    I'm banking on fighters not counting as anti-air weaponry. But again, it's a technicality, and if it doesn't count your answer is the result
    $endgroup$
    – Hobbamok
    Jun 5 at 12:16




    $begingroup$
    I'm banking on fighters not counting as anti-air weaponry. But again, it's a technicality, and if it doesn't count your answer is the result
    $endgroup$
    – Hobbamok
    Jun 5 at 12:16




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    @Hobbamok The typical French Caudron C.714 had a service ceiling of 9100 m - the Ardo could just coast along 900 meters over them and outfly them. the Dewoitine D.520C.1 could reach the Ardo's ceiling, but the Ardo was still faster...
    $endgroup$
    – Trish
    Jun 5 at 12:34





    $begingroup$
    @Hobbamok The typical French Caudron C.714 had a service ceiling of 9100 m - the Ardo could just coast along 900 meters over them and outfly them. the Dewoitine D.520C.1 could reach the Ardo's ceiling, but the Ardo was still faster...
    $endgroup$
    – Trish
    Jun 5 at 12:34













    $begingroup$
    @Trish I wouldn't call C714 typical. The design was mostly a redesign of acrobatic planes to fighters that didn't lead to a reasonable construction. Only Polish pilots decided to continue using it when the flaws of the construction were discovered (very soon all planes were formally grounded but Poles decided to fly them anyway as they had no better option at that time - other than staying idle on the ground).
    $endgroup$
    – Ister
    Jun 5 at 17:47





    $begingroup$
    @Trish I wouldn't call C714 typical. The design was mostly a redesign of acrobatic planes to fighters that didn't lead to a reasonable construction. Only Polish pilots decided to continue using it when the flaws of the construction were discovered (very soon all planes were formally grounded but Poles decided to fly them anyway as they had no better option at that time - other than staying idle on the ground).
    $endgroup$
    – Ister
    Jun 5 at 17:47












    15












    $begingroup$

    Bury the lady.



    lady liberty and scaffolds
    source



    1. Surround the building with protective scaffolds / drapes. Here Lady Liberty stands in for Notre Dame.


    2. Erect concrete walls around the entirety of the building in a ziggurat-type stepped terrace.


    3. Cover horizontal parts of ziggurat with dirt. Plant grass. Install bathrooms and a snack bar at the top.


    4. The citizenry can use this structure as a park while it stands. If bombers come they will see a park. If they bomb the park, the concrete bunker will protect the cathedral below.


    5. 150 years later, the cathedral is still underneath the ziggurat which was never taken down. There are windows to allow sunlight to shine down inside in long rays. People like their pyramid park, and they like their cathedral protected under it.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 6




      $begingroup$
      @MichaelSeifert Perfect for a waterslide ending in the river!
      $endgroup$
      – Willk
      Jun 4 at 16:04






    • 8




      $begingroup$
      Is it possible to build something of that nature in 1 week?
      $endgroup$
      – Nuclear Wang
      Jun 4 at 17:21






    • 9




      $begingroup$
      @NuclearWang It would be a miracle if something like that could be built in 1 year.
      $endgroup$
      – Shufflepants
      Jun 4 at 18:06






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      @Shufflepants Frankly, it would be a wonder of the world and one of the truly great projects of humanity if it was done in a decade. The Great Pyramid of Khufu took about 20, but while it is half again as tall as The Ziggurat of Paris would have to be, its construction is also somewhat simpler, in that it doesn't need a Notre Dame-shaped cavity inside it.
      $endgroup$
      – Williham Totland
      Jun 4 at 19:40






    • 17




      $begingroup$
      If bombers come they will see a park I have to question that seeing this brand new pyramid isn't simply going to tip them off. E.g. "Where's this damned cathedral, ja? - I don't know, but say Manfred, what's this giant pyramid over there?"
      $endgroup$
      – AmiralPatate
      Jun 5 at 6:02
















    15












    $begingroup$

    Bury the lady.



    lady liberty and scaffolds
    source



    1. Surround the building with protective scaffolds / drapes. Here Lady Liberty stands in for Notre Dame.


    2. Erect concrete walls around the entirety of the building in a ziggurat-type stepped terrace.


    3. Cover horizontal parts of ziggurat with dirt. Plant grass. Install bathrooms and a snack bar at the top.


    4. The citizenry can use this structure as a park while it stands. If bombers come they will see a park. If they bomb the park, the concrete bunker will protect the cathedral below.


    5. 150 years later, the cathedral is still underneath the ziggurat which was never taken down. There are windows to allow sunlight to shine down inside in long rays. People like their pyramid park, and they like their cathedral protected under it.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 6




      $begingroup$
      @MichaelSeifert Perfect for a waterslide ending in the river!
      $endgroup$
      – Willk
      Jun 4 at 16:04






    • 8




      $begingroup$
      Is it possible to build something of that nature in 1 week?
      $endgroup$
      – Nuclear Wang
      Jun 4 at 17:21






    • 9




      $begingroup$
      @NuclearWang It would be a miracle if something like that could be built in 1 year.
      $endgroup$
      – Shufflepants
      Jun 4 at 18:06






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      @Shufflepants Frankly, it would be a wonder of the world and one of the truly great projects of humanity if it was done in a decade. The Great Pyramid of Khufu took about 20, but while it is half again as tall as The Ziggurat of Paris would have to be, its construction is also somewhat simpler, in that it doesn't need a Notre Dame-shaped cavity inside it.
      $endgroup$
      – Williham Totland
      Jun 4 at 19:40






    • 17




      $begingroup$
      If bombers come they will see a park I have to question that seeing this brand new pyramid isn't simply going to tip them off. E.g. "Where's this damned cathedral, ja? - I don't know, but say Manfred, what's this giant pyramid over there?"
      $endgroup$
      – AmiralPatate
      Jun 5 at 6:02














    15












    15








    15





    $begingroup$

    Bury the lady.



    lady liberty and scaffolds
    source



    1. Surround the building with protective scaffolds / drapes. Here Lady Liberty stands in for Notre Dame.


    2. Erect concrete walls around the entirety of the building in a ziggurat-type stepped terrace.


    3. Cover horizontal parts of ziggurat with dirt. Plant grass. Install bathrooms and a snack bar at the top.


    4. The citizenry can use this structure as a park while it stands. If bombers come they will see a park. If they bomb the park, the concrete bunker will protect the cathedral below.


    5. 150 years later, the cathedral is still underneath the ziggurat which was never taken down. There are windows to allow sunlight to shine down inside in long rays. People like their pyramid park, and they like their cathedral protected under it.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    Bury the lady.



    lady liberty and scaffolds
    source



    1. Surround the building with protective scaffolds / drapes. Here Lady Liberty stands in for Notre Dame.


    2. Erect concrete walls around the entirety of the building in a ziggurat-type stepped terrace.


    3. Cover horizontal parts of ziggurat with dirt. Plant grass. Install bathrooms and a snack bar at the top.


    4. The citizenry can use this structure as a park while it stands. If bombers come they will see a park. If they bomb the park, the concrete bunker will protect the cathedral below.


    5. 150 years later, the cathedral is still underneath the ziggurat which was never taken down. There are windows to allow sunlight to shine down inside in long rays. People like their pyramid park, and they like their cathedral protected under it.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Jun 4 at 14:18









    WillkWillk

    126k30237528




    126k30237528







    • 6




      $begingroup$
      @MichaelSeifert Perfect for a waterslide ending in the river!
      $endgroup$
      – Willk
      Jun 4 at 16:04






    • 8




      $begingroup$
      Is it possible to build something of that nature in 1 week?
      $endgroup$
      – Nuclear Wang
      Jun 4 at 17:21






    • 9




      $begingroup$
      @NuclearWang It would be a miracle if something like that could be built in 1 year.
      $endgroup$
      – Shufflepants
      Jun 4 at 18:06






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      @Shufflepants Frankly, it would be a wonder of the world and one of the truly great projects of humanity if it was done in a decade. The Great Pyramid of Khufu took about 20, but while it is half again as tall as The Ziggurat of Paris would have to be, its construction is also somewhat simpler, in that it doesn't need a Notre Dame-shaped cavity inside it.
      $endgroup$
      – Williham Totland
      Jun 4 at 19:40






    • 17




      $begingroup$
      If bombers come they will see a park I have to question that seeing this brand new pyramid isn't simply going to tip them off. E.g. "Where's this damned cathedral, ja? - I don't know, but say Manfred, what's this giant pyramid over there?"
      $endgroup$
      – AmiralPatate
      Jun 5 at 6:02













    • 6




      $begingroup$
      @MichaelSeifert Perfect for a waterslide ending in the river!
      $endgroup$
      – Willk
      Jun 4 at 16:04






    • 8




      $begingroup$
      Is it possible to build something of that nature in 1 week?
      $endgroup$
      – Nuclear Wang
      Jun 4 at 17:21






    • 9




      $begingroup$
      @NuclearWang It would be a miracle if something like that could be built in 1 year.
      $endgroup$
      – Shufflepants
      Jun 4 at 18:06






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      @Shufflepants Frankly, it would be a wonder of the world and one of the truly great projects of humanity if it was done in a decade. The Great Pyramid of Khufu took about 20, but while it is half again as tall as The Ziggurat of Paris would have to be, its construction is also somewhat simpler, in that it doesn't need a Notre Dame-shaped cavity inside it.
      $endgroup$
      – Williham Totland
      Jun 4 at 19:40






    • 17




      $begingroup$
      If bombers come they will see a park I have to question that seeing this brand new pyramid isn't simply going to tip them off. E.g. "Where's this damned cathedral, ja? - I don't know, but say Manfred, what's this giant pyramid over there?"
      $endgroup$
      – AmiralPatate
      Jun 5 at 6:02








    6




    6




    $begingroup$
    @MichaelSeifert Perfect for a waterslide ending in the river!
    $endgroup$
    – Willk
    Jun 4 at 16:04




    $begingroup$
    @MichaelSeifert Perfect for a waterslide ending in the river!
    $endgroup$
    – Willk
    Jun 4 at 16:04




    8




    8




    $begingroup$
    Is it possible to build something of that nature in 1 week?
    $endgroup$
    – Nuclear Wang
    Jun 4 at 17:21




    $begingroup$
    Is it possible to build something of that nature in 1 week?
    $endgroup$
    – Nuclear Wang
    Jun 4 at 17:21




    9




    9




    $begingroup$
    @NuclearWang It would be a miracle if something like that could be built in 1 year.
    $endgroup$
    – Shufflepants
    Jun 4 at 18:06




    $begingroup$
    @NuclearWang It would be a miracle if something like that could be built in 1 year.
    $endgroup$
    – Shufflepants
    Jun 4 at 18:06




    3




    3




    $begingroup$
    @Shufflepants Frankly, it would be a wonder of the world and one of the truly great projects of humanity if it was done in a decade. The Great Pyramid of Khufu took about 20, but while it is half again as tall as The Ziggurat of Paris would have to be, its construction is also somewhat simpler, in that it doesn't need a Notre Dame-shaped cavity inside it.
    $endgroup$
    – Williham Totland
    Jun 4 at 19:40




    $begingroup$
    @Shufflepants Frankly, it would be a wonder of the world and one of the truly great projects of humanity if it was done in a decade. The Great Pyramid of Khufu took about 20, but while it is half again as tall as The Ziggurat of Paris would have to be, its construction is also somewhat simpler, in that it doesn't need a Notre Dame-shaped cavity inside it.
    $endgroup$
    – Williham Totland
    Jun 4 at 19:40




    17




    17




    $begingroup$
    If bombers come they will see a park I have to question that seeing this brand new pyramid isn't simply going to tip them off. E.g. "Where's this damned cathedral, ja? - I don't know, but say Manfred, what's this giant pyramid over there?"
    $endgroup$
    – AmiralPatate
    Jun 5 at 6:02





    $begingroup$
    If bombers come they will see a park I have to question that seeing this brand new pyramid isn't simply going to tip them off. E.g. "Where's this damned cathedral, ja? - I don't know, but say Manfred, what's this giant pyramid over there?"
    $endgroup$
    – AmiralPatate
    Jun 5 at 6:02












    11












    $begingroup$

    Hide the thing pilots could know where Notre Dame should be. The islands. Bomb operator didn't looked at maps. They looked at ground below them. So the pilot would go along the river and bombardier would open the hatch when he would spot the first island. So just cover one canal with fake buildings and create fake one earlier alongside river.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      what abotu the versy distinct buildings right next to Notre Dame?
      $endgroup$
      – Trish
      Jun 5 at 7:43










    • $begingroup$
      @Trish Right next are hosues. Which look from above just like any other houses. If you have in mind Louvre then, again, paint some roofs on the courtyard
      $endgroup$
      – SZCZERZO KŁY
      Jun 5 at 7:49










    • $begingroup$
      You are ways of: look at the aerial photo from 1943 I put in my answer. You are looking at a gathering of some of the largest houses in the area. Even filling in one of both of the canals won't make these large, coherent houses with large courtyards not stand out among the mostly tiny roofs in paris.
      $endgroup$
      – Trish
      Jun 5 at 7:56










    • $begingroup$
      Heck, even the mere existence of the Louvre and historical texts are a dead giveaway to the location of the cathedral island.
      $endgroup$
      – Trish
      Jun 5 at 7:59










    • $begingroup$
      That's a great idea for a pilot - let's go the longest possible way to give as much time for AA guns to shoot as possible. German is to the RIGHT. Going from left to use Champs-Élysées as a navigation point would expose the planes to unnecessary fire.
      $endgroup$
      – SZCZERZO KŁY
      Jun 5 at 8:14















    11












    $begingroup$

    Hide the thing pilots could know where Notre Dame should be. The islands. Bomb operator didn't looked at maps. They looked at ground below them. So the pilot would go along the river and bombardier would open the hatch when he would spot the first island. So just cover one canal with fake buildings and create fake one earlier alongside river.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      what abotu the versy distinct buildings right next to Notre Dame?
      $endgroup$
      – Trish
      Jun 5 at 7:43










    • $begingroup$
      @Trish Right next are hosues. Which look from above just like any other houses. If you have in mind Louvre then, again, paint some roofs on the courtyard
      $endgroup$
      – SZCZERZO KŁY
      Jun 5 at 7:49










    • $begingroup$
      You are ways of: look at the aerial photo from 1943 I put in my answer. You are looking at a gathering of some of the largest houses in the area. Even filling in one of both of the canals won't make these large, coherent houses with large courtyards not stand out among the mostly tiny roofs in paris.
      $endgroup$
      – Trish
      Jun 5 at 7:56










    • $begingroup$
      Heck, even the mere existence of the Louvre and historical texts are a dead giveaway to the location of the cathedral island.
      $endgroup$
      – Trish
      Jun 5 at 7:59










    • $begingroup$
      That's a great idea for a pilot - let's go the longest possible way to give as much time for AA guns to shoot as possible. German is to the RIGHT. Going from left to use Champs-Élysées as a navigation point would expose the planes to unnecessary fire.
      $endgroup$
      – SZCZERZO KŁY
      Jun 5 at 8:14













    11












    11








    11





    $begingroup$

    Hide the thing pilots could know where Notre Dame should be. The islands. Bomb operator didn't looked at maps. They looked at ground below them. So the pilot would go along the river and bombardier would open the hatch when he would spot the first island. So just cover one canal with fake buildings and create fake one earlier alongside river.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    Hide the thing pilots could know where Notre Dame should be. The islands. Bomb operator didn't looked at maps. They looked at ground below them. So the pilot would go along the river and bombardier would open the hatch when he would spot the first island. So just cover one canal with fake buildings and create fake one earlier alongside river.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Jun 4 at 9:22









    SZCZERZO KŁYSZCZERZO KŁY

    18k22658




    18k22658











    • $begingroup$
      what abotu the versy distinct buildings right next to Notre Dame?
      $endgroup$
      – Trish
      Jun 5 at 7:43










    • $begingroup$
      @Trish Right next are hosues. Which look from above just like any other houses. If you have in mind Louvre then, again, paint some roofs on the courtyard
      $endgroup$
      – SZCZERZO KŁY
      Jun 5 at 7:49










    • $begingroup$
      You are ways of: look at the aerial photo from 1943 I put in my answer. You are looking at a gathering of some of the largest houses in the area. Even filling in one of both of the canals won't make these large, coherent houses with large courtyards not stand out among the mostly tiny roofs in paris.
      $endgroup$
      – Trish
      Jun 5 at 7:56










    • $begingroup$
      Heck, even the mere existence of the Louvre and historical texts are a dead giveaway to the location of the cathedral island.
      $endgroup$
      – Trish
      Jun 5 at 7:59










    • $begingroup$
      That's a great idea for a pilot - let's go the longest possible way to give as much time for AA guns to shoot as possible. German is to the RIGHT. Going from left to use Champs-Élysées as a navigation point would expose the planes to unnecessary fire.
      $endgroup$
      – SZCZERZO KŁY
      Jun 5 at 8:14
















    • $begingroup$
      what abotu the versy distinct buildings right next to Notre Dame?
      $endgroup$
      – Trish
      Jun 5 at 7:43










    • $begingroup$
      @Trish Right next are hosues. Which look from above just like any other houses. If you have in mind Louvre then, again, paint some roofs on the courtyard
      $endgroup$
      – SZCZERZO KŁY
      Jun 5 at 7:49










    • $begingroup$
      You are ways of: look at the aerial photo from 1943 I put in my answer. You are looking at a gathering of some of the largest houses in the area. Even filling in one of both of the canals won't make these large, coherent houses with large courtyards not stand out among the mostly tiny roofs in paris.
      $endgroup$
      – Trish
      Jun 5 at 7:56










    • $begingroup$
      Heck, even the mere existence of the Louvre and historical texts are a dead giveaway to the location of the cathedral island.
      $endgroup$
      – Trish
      Jun 5 at 7:59










    • $begingroup$
      That's a great idea for a pilot - let's go the longest possible way to give as much time for AA guns to shoot as possible. German is to the RIGHT. Going from left to use Champs-Élysées as a navigation point would expose the planes to unnecessary fire.
      $endgroup$
      – SZCZERZO KŁY
      Jun 5 at 8:14















    $begingroup$
    what abotu the versy distinct buildings right next to Notre Dame?
    $endgroup$
    – Trish
    Jun 5 at 7:43




    $begingroup$
    what abotu the versy distinct buildings right next to Notre Dame?
    $endgroup$
    – Trish
    Jun 5 at 7:43












    $begingroup$
    @Trish Right next are hosues. Which look from above just like any other houses. If you have in mind Louvre then, again, paint some roofs on the courtyard
    $endgroup$
    – SZCZERZO KŁY
    Jun 5 at 7:49




    $begingroup$
    @Trish Right next are hosues. Which look from above just like any other houses. If you have in mind Louvre then, again, paint some roofs on the courtyard
    $endgroup$
    – SZCZERZO KŁY
    Jun 5 at 7:49












    $begingroup$
    You are ways of: look at the aerial photo from 1943 I put in my answer. You are looking at a gathering of some of the largest houses in the area. Even filling in one of both of the canals won't make these large, coherent houses with large courtyards not stand out among the mostly tiny roofs in paris.
    $endgroup$
    – Trish
    Jun 5 at 7:56




    $begingroup$
    You are ways of: look at the aerial photo from 1943 I put in my answer. You are looking at a gathering of some of the largest houses in the area. Even filling in one of both of the canals won't make these large, coherent houses with large courtyards not stand out among the mostly tiny roofs in paris.
    $endgroup$
    – Trish
    Jun 5 at 7:56












    $begingroup$
    Heck, even the mere existence of the Louvre and historical texts are a dead giveaway to the location of the cathedral island.
    $endgroup$
    – Trish
    Jun 5 at 7:59




    $begingroup$
    Heck, even the mere existence of the Louvre and historical texts are a dead giveaway to the location of the cathedral island.
    $endgroup$
    – Trish
    Jun 5 at 7:59












    $begingroup$
    That's a great idea for a pilot - let's go the longest possible way to give as much time for AA guns to shoot as possible. German is to the RIGHT. Going from left to use Champs-Élysées as a navigation point would expose the planes to unnecessary fire.
    $endgroup$
    – SZCZERZO KŁY
    Jun 5 at 8:14




    $begingroup$
    That's a great idea for a pilot - let's go the longest possible way to give as much time for AA guns to shoot as possible. German is to the RIGHT. Going from left to use Champs-Élysées as a navigation point would expose the planes to unnecessary fire.
    $endgroup$
    – SZCZERZO KŁY
    Jun 5 at 8:14











    8












    $begingroup$

    Cause a great fire and use the smoke to obscure the target.



    Potential problems with this strategy would be:



    • A local cloud of smoke would be a dead giveaway of the cathedrals location

    • A city-wide cloud would be very difficult to maintain


    • Uncontrolled fire could cause the cathedral to be harmed

    • The weather may cause the smoke to be ineffective

    • A great fire requires great fuel





    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      I also wonder if assuming enough manpower can be drafted it might be possible to construct a decoy cathedral elsewhere, doesn't need to even be all that detailed as it's trying to fool pilots that are a thousand feet away or more. Something like wooden framing covered with cloth sheets painted to give the illusion of the architectural detail of the building could possibly work, sure a cathedral is a little larger but tactics like this have been used to create decoys of whole divisions of tanks and such to fool reconnaissance etc.
      $endgroup$
      – MttJocy
      Jun 4 at 9:56







    • 4




      $begingroup$
      @MttJocy Creating a flimsy dummy cathedral like that could be feasible in a short time frame. Widening the river to accommodate a new big fake island that to put it on, not so much. The Germans might not have maps, but they will know that the cathedral is located in the middle of the river Seine.
      $endgroup$
      – Michael MacAskill
      Jun 5 at 3:54







    • 7




      $begingroup$
      Hmm, fire... Couldn't we use the cathedral itself for that ??
      $endgroup$
      – Hobbamok
      Jun 5 at 11:58










    • $begingroup$
      While requiring major effort, this is the only thing that will work of the yet mentioned ideas.
      $endgroup$
      – infinitezero
      Jun 5 at 12:15






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @MttJocy If you don't manage to hide to real cathedral, the Germans could just bomb both the real and the decoy. Or, if they pick one at random, they still have a 50% chance of hitting the real one. That is, if they can't distinguish between the real one and the decoy.
      $endgroup$
      – Abigail
      Jun 6 at 0:20















    8












    $begingroup$

    Cause a great fire and use the smoke to obscure the target.



    Potential problems with this strategy would be:



    • A local cloud of smoke would be a dead giveaway of the cathedrals location

    • A city-wide cloud would be very difficult to maintain


    • Uncontrolled fire could cause the cathedral to be harmed

    • The weather may cause the smoke to be ineffective

    • A great fire requires great fuel





    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      I also wonder if assuming enough manpower can be drafted it might be possible to construct a decoy cathedral elsewhere, doesn't need to even be all that detailed as it's trying to fool pilots that are a thousand feet away or more. Something like wooden framing covered with cloth sheets painted to give the illusion of the architectural detail of the building could possibly work, sure a cathedral is a little larger but tactics like this have been used to create decoys of whole divisions of tanks and such to fool reconnaissance etc.
      $endgroup$
      – MttJocy
      Jun 4 at 9:56







    • 4




      $begingroup$
      @MttJocy Creating a flimsy dummy cathedral like that could be feasible in a short time frame. Widening the river to accommodate a new big fake island that to put it on, not so much. The Germans might not have maps, but they will know that the cathedral is located in the middle of the river Seine.
      $endgroup$
      – Michael MacAskill
      Jun 5 at 3:54







    • 7




      $begingroup$
      Hmm, fire... Couldn't we use the cathedral itself for that ??
      $endgroup$
      – Hobbamok
      Jun 5 at 11:58










    • $begingroup$
      While requiring major effort, this is the only thing that will work of the yet mentioned ideas.
      $endgroup$
      – infinitezero
      Jun 5 at 12:15






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @MttJocy If you don't manage to hide to real cathedral, the Germans could just bomb both the real and the decoy. Or, if they pick one at random, they still have a 50% chance of hitting the real one. That is, if they can't distinguish between the real one and the decoy.
      $endgroup$
      – Abigail
      Jun 6 at 0:20













    8












    8








    8





    $begingroup$

    Cause a great fire and use the smoke to obscure the target.



    Potential problems with this strategy would be:



    • A local cloud of smoke would be a dead giveaway of the cathedrals location

    • A city-wide cloud would be very difficult to maintain


    • Uncontrolled fire could cause the cathedral to be harmed

    • The weather may cause the smoke to be ineffective

    • A great fire requires great fuel





    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    Cause a great fire and use the smoke to obscure the target.



    Potential problems with this strategy would be:



    • A local cloud of smoke would be a dead giveaway of the cathedrals location

    • A city-wide cloud would be very difficult to maintain


    • Uncontrolled fire could cause the cathedral to be harmed

    • The weather may cause the smoke to be ineffective

    • A great fire requires great fuel






    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Jun 4 at 8:56









    A Lambent EyeA Lambent Eye

    2,9981554




    2,9981554











    • $begingroup$
      I also wonder if assuming enough manpower can be drafted it might be possible to construct a decoy cathedral elsewhere, doesn't need to even be all that detailed as it's trying to fool pilots that are a thousand feet away or more. Something like wooden framing covered with cloth sheets painted to give the illusion of the architectural detail of the building could possibly work, sure a cathedral is a little larger but tactics like this have been used to create decoys of whole divisions of tanks and such to fool reconnaissance etc.
      $endgroup$
      – MttJocy
      Jun 4 at 9:56







    • 4




      $begingroup$
      @MttJocy Creating a flimsy dummy cathedral like that could be feasible in a short time frame. Widening the river to accommodate a new big fake island that to put it on, not so much. The Germans might not have maps, but they will know that the cathedral is located in the middle of the river Seine.
      $endgroup$
      – Michael MacAskill
      Jun 5 at 3:54







    • 7




      $begingroup$
      Hmm, fire... Couldn't we use the cathedral itself for that ??
      $endgroup$
      – Hobbamok
      Jun 5 at 11:58










    • $begingroup$
      While requiring major effort, this is the only thing that will work of the yet mentioned ideas.
      $endgroup$
      – infinitezero
      Jun 5 at 12:15






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @MttJocy If you don't manage to hide to real cathedral, the Germans could just bomb both the real and the decoy. Or, if they pick one at random, they still have a 50% chance of hitting the real one. That is, if they can't distinguish between the real one and the decoy.
      $endgroup$
      – Abigail
      Jun 6 at 0:20
















    • $begingroup$
      I also wonder if assuming enough manpower can be drafted it might be possible to construct a decoy cathedral elsewhere, doesn't need to even be all that detailed as it's trying to fool pilots that are a thousand feet away or more. Something like wooden framing covered with cloth sheets painted to give the illusion of the architectural detail of the building could possibly work, sure a cathedral is a little larger but tactics like this have been used to create decoys of whole divisions of tanks and such to fool reconnaissance etc.
      $endgroup$
      – MttJocy
      Jun 4 at 9:56







    • 4




      $begingroup$
      @MttJocy Creating a flimsy dummy cathedral like that could be feasible in a short time frame. Widening the river to accommodate a new big fake island that to put it on, not so much. The Germans might not have maps, but they will know that the cathedral is located in the middle of the river Seine.
      $endgroup$
      – Michael MacAskill
      Jun 5 at 3:54







    • 7




      $begingroup$
      Hmm, fire... Couldn't we use the cathedral itself for that ??
      $endgroup$
      – Hobbamok
      Jun 5 at 11:58










    • $begingroup$
      While requiring major effort, this is the only thing that will work of the yet mentioned ideas.
      $endgroup$
      – infinitezero
      Jun 5 at 12:15






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @MttJocy If you don't manage to hide to real cathedral, the Germans could just bomb both the real and the decoy. Or, if they pick one at random, they still have a 50% chance of hitting the real one. That is, if they can't distinguish between the real one and the decoy.
      $endgroup$
      – Abigail
      Jun 6 at 0:20















    $begingroup$
    I also wonder if assuming enough manpower can be drafted it might be possible to construct a decoy cathedral elsewhere, doesn't need to even be all that detailed as it's trying to fool pilots that are a thousand feet away or more. Something like wooden framing covered with cloth sheets painted to give the illusion of the architectural detail of the building could possibly work, sure a cathedral is a little larger but tactics like this have been used to create decoys of whole divisions of tanks and such to fool reconnaissance etc.
    $endgroup$
    – MttJocy
    Jun 4 at 9:56





    $begingroup$
    I also wonder if assuming enough manpower can be drafted it might be possible to construct a decoy cathedral elsewhere, doesn't need to even be all that detailed as it's trying to fool pilots that are a thousand feet away or more. Something like wooden framing covered with cloth sheets painted to give the illusion of the architectural detail of the building could possibly work, sure a cathedral is a little larger but tactics like this have been used to create decoys of whole divisions of tanks and such to fool reconnaissance etc.
    $endgroup$
    – MttJocy
    Jun 4 at 9:56





    4




    4




    $begingroup$
    @MttJocy Creating a flimsy dummy cathedral like that could be feasible in a short time frame. Widening the river to accommodate a new big fake island that to put it on, not so much. The Germans might not have maps, but they will know that the cathedral is located in the middle of the river Seine.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael MacAskill
    Jun 5 at 3:54





    $begingroup$
    @MttJocy Creating a flimsy dummy cathedral like that could be feasible in a short time frame. Widening the river to accommodate a new big fake island that to put it on, not so much. The Germans might not have maps, but they will know that the cathedral is located in the middle of the river Seine.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael MacAskill
    Jun 5 at 3:54





    7




    7




    $begingroup$
    Hmm, fire... Couldn't we use the cathedral itself for that ??
    $endgroup$
    – Hobbamok
    Jun 5 at 11:58




    $begingroup$
    Hmm, fire... Couldn't we use the cathedral itself for that ??
    $endgroup$
    – Hobbamok
    Jun 5 at 11:58












    $begingroup$
    While requiring major effort, this is the only thing that will work of the yet mentioned ideas.
    $endgroup$
    – infinitezero
    Jun 5 at 12:15




    $begingroup$
    While requiring major effort, this is the only thing that will work of the yet mentioned ideas.
    $endgroup$
    – infinitezero
    Jun 5 at 12:15




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    @MttJocy If you don't manage to hide to real cathedral, the Germans could just bomb both the real and the decoy. Or, if they pick one at random, they still have a 50% chance of hitting the real one. That is, if they can't distinguish between the real one and the decoy.
    $endgroup$
    – Abigail
    Jun 6 at 0:20




    $begingroup$
    @MttJocy If you don't manage to hide to real cathedral, the Germans could just bomb both the real and the decoy. Or, if they pick one at random, they still have a 50% chance of hitting the real one. That is, if they can't distinguish between the real one and the decoy.
    $endgroup$
    – Abigail
    Jun 6 at 0:20











    5












    $begingroup$

    Strategically, it's highly unlikely that the Luftwaffe would want to bomb Notre Dame anyway. Landmarks offered pilots a critical advantage that is so obvious, it's in the name: They Mark the Land. With nothing to support actual location pinpointing, a key strategy in World War II was to spare certain parts of the city so they could find the more strategic parts of the city.



    When the allies were bombing Munich, pilots and Bombadiers were under very strict orders to not bomb exactly four buildings in the central part of the city (at least one was a church). Through out the entire war, only one plane damaged the four buildings, and that was because these buildings were easily identified from the air, and configured in a square shape... If they remained standing, allied planes could approach Munich and use the four structures as a compass rose that guided them to the more important factories and infrastructure necessary to the war effort. Of the four buildings 3 escaped the war with no damage, and one only had minor damage when an allied plane flew too low and knocked the top of the spire to the ground. To give you an idea of the damage inflicted, Munich today is still uncovering unexploded WWII ordinances and the Palace of the Bavarian kings, which is one street over from the town center, is still being reconstructed to it's pre-war state... a project that is expected to conclude sometime around 2040!



    Although I'm not sure on the matter, it's highly likely that Notre Dame's distinct architecture and central location would serve a similar purpose, allowing German Pilots to direction find there way to important targets.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      my points of choice to not bomb in Paris would be: Eiffel tower, Louvre, Arc de Triomphe - forming a triangle around the center. The Avenue de la grande Armee forms a good ENE axis in Paris, extendable by the Palais de Luxembourg into a trapezoid, the south-eastern corner formed by the compass-rose PdL.
      $endgroup$
      – Trish
      Jun 5 at 16:18






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Considering the Notre Dame is on one of the two island in the Seine, with the island themselves being pretty impressive landmarks, flattening the Notre Dame isn't a major loss as far as navigational landmarks go.
      $endgroup$
      – Abigail
      Jun 6 at 0:23















    5












    $begingroup$

    Strategically, it's highly unlikely that the Luftwaffe would want to bomb Notre Dame anyway. Landmarks offered pilots a critical advantage that is so obvious, it's in the name: They Mark the Land. With nothing to support actual location pinpointing, a key strategy in World War II was to spare certain parts of the city so they could find the more strategic parts of the city.



    When the allies were bombing Munich, pilots and Bombadiers were under very strict orders to not bomb exactly four buildings in the central part of the city (at least one was a church). Through out the entire war, only one plane damaged the four buildings, and that was because these buildings were easily identified from the air, and configured in a square shape... If they remained standing, allied planes could approach Munich and use the four structures as a compass rose that guided them to the more important factories and infrastructure necessary to the war effort. Of the four buildings 3 escaped the war with no damage, and one only had minor damage when an allied plane flew too low and knocked the top of the spire to the ground. To give you an idea of the damage inflicted, Munich today is still uncovering unexploded WWII ordinances and the Palace of the Bavarian kings, which is one street over from the town center, is still being reconstructed to it's pre-war state... a project that is expected to conclude sometime around 2040!



    Although I'm not sure on the matter, it's highly likely that Notre Dame's distinct architecture and central location would serve a similar purpose, allowing German Pilots to direction find there way to important targets.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      my points of choice to not bomb in Paris would be: Eiffel tower, Louvre, Arc de Triomphe - forming a triangle around the center. The Avenue de la grande Armee forms a good ENE axis in Paris, extendable by the Palais de Luxembourg into a trapezoid, the south-eastern corner formed by the compass-rose PdL.
      $endgroup$
      – Trish
      Jun 5 at 16:18






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Considering the Notre Dame is on one of the two island in the Seine, with the island themselves being pretty impressive landmarks, flattening the Notre Dame isn't a major loss as far as navigational landmarks go.
      $endgroup$
      – Abigail
      Jun 6 at 0:23













    5












    5








    5





    $begingroup$

    Strategically, it's highly unlikely that the Luftwaffe would want to bomb Notre Dame anyway. Landmarks offered pilots a critical advantage that is so obvious, it's in the name: They Mark the Land. With nothing to support actual location pinpointing, a key strategy in World War II was to spare certain parts of the city so they could find the more strategic parts of the city.



    When the allies were bombing Munich, pilots and Bombadiers were under very strict orders to not bomb exactly four buildings in the central part of the city (at least one was a church). Through out the entire war, only one plane damaged the four buildings, and that was because these buildings were easily identified from the air, and configured in a square shape... If they remained standing, allied planes could approach Munich and use the four structures as a compass rose that guided them to the more important factories and infrastructure necessary to the war effort. Of the four buildings 3 escaped the war with no damage, and one only had minor damage when an allied plane flew too low and knocked the top of the spire to the ground. To give you an idea of the damage inflicted, Munich today is still uncovering unexploded WWII ordinances and the Palace of the Bavarian kings, which is one street over from the town center, is still being reconstructed to it's pre-war state... a project that is expected to conclude sometime around 2040!



    Although I'm not sure on the matter, it's highly likely that Notre Dame's distinct architecture and central location would serve a similar purpose, allowing German Pilots to direction find there way to important targets.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    Strategically, it's highly unlikely that the Luftwaffe would want to bomb Notre Dame anyway. Landmarks offered pilots a critical advantage that is so obvious, it's in the name: They Mark the Land. With nothing to support actual location pinpointing, a key strategy in World War II was to spare certain parts of the city so they could find the more strategic parts of the city.



    When the allies were bombing Munich, pilots and Bombadiers were under very strict orders to not bomb exactly four buildings in the central part of the city (at least one was a church). Through out the entire war, only one plane damaged the four buildings, and that was because these buildings were easily identified from the air, and configured in a square shape... If they remained standing, allied planes could approach Munich and use the four structures as a compass rose that guided them to the more important factories and infrastructure necessary to the war effort. Of the four buildings 3 escaped the war with no damage, and one only had minor damage when an allied plane flew too low and knocked the top of the spire to the ground. To give you an idea of the damage inflicted, Munich today is still uncovering unexploded WWII ordinances and the Palace of the Bavarian kings, which is one street over from the town center, is still being reconstructed to it's pre-war state... a project that is expected to conclude sometime around 2040!



    Although I'm not sure on the matter, it's highly likely that Notre Dame's distinct architecture and central location would serve a similar purpose, allowing German Pilots to direction find there way to important targets.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Jun 5 at 13:47









    hszmvhszmv

    5,720517




    5,720517







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      my points of choice to not bomb in Paris would be: Eiffel tower, Louvre, Arc de Triomphe - forming a triangle around the center. The Avenue de la grande Armee forms a good ENE axis in Paris, extendable by the Palais de Luxembourg into a trapezoid, the south-eastern corner formed by the compass-rose PdL.
      $endgroup$
      – Trish
      Jun 5 at 16:18






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Considering the Notre Dame is on one of the two island in the Seine, with the island themselves being pretty impressive landmarks, flattening the Notre Dame isn't a major loss as far as navigational landmarks go.
      $endgroup$
      – Abigail
      Jun 6 at 0:23












    • 1




      $begingroup$
      my points of choice to not bomb in Paris would be: Eiffel tower, Louvre, Arc de Triomphe - forming a triangle around the center. The Avenue de la grande Armee forms a good ENE axis in Paris, extendable by the Palais de Luxembourg into a trapezoid, the south-eastern corner formed by the compass-rose PdL.
      $endgroup$
      – Trish
      Jun 5 at 16:18






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Considering the Notre Dame is on one of the two island in the Seine, with the island themselves being pretty impressive landmarks, flattening the Notre Dame isn't a major loss as far as navigational landmarks go.
      $endgroup$
      – Abigail
      Jun 6 at 0:23







    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    my points of choice to not bomb in Paris would be: Eiffel tower, Louvre, Arc de Triomphe - forming a triangle around the center. The Avenue de la grande Armee forms a good ENE axis in Paris, extendable by the Palais de Luxembourg into a trapezoid, the south-eastern corner formed by the compass-rose PdL.
    $endgroup$
    – Trish
    Jun 5 at 16:18




    $begingroup$
    my points of choice to not bomb in Paris would be: Eiffel tower, Louvre, Arc de Triomphe - forming a triangle around the center. The Avenue de la grande Armee forms a good ENE axis in Paris, extendable by the Palais de Luxembourg into a trapezoid, the south-eastern corner formed by the compass-rose PdL.
    $endgroup$
    – Trish
    Jun 5 at 16:18




    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    Considering the Notre Dame is on one of the two island in the Seine, with the island themselves being pretty impressive landmarks, flattening the Notre Dame isn't a major loss as far as navigational landmarks go.
    $endgroup$
    – Abigail
    Jun 6 at 0:23




    $begingroup$
    Considering the Notre Dame is on one of the two island in the Seine, with the island themselves being pretty impressive landmarks, flattening the Notre Dame isn't a major loss as far as navigational landmarks go.
    $endgroup$
    – Abigail
    Jun 6 at 0:23











    4












    $begingroup$

    Since your entire premise is ridiculous [aka unsolveable] (especially the "no maps" with photography existent...) I'll save the cathedral with some technicality:




    together with help from the Allies, prevent the bombers from spotting the cathedral?




    ENHANCE




    together with help from the Allies




    And there you go.



    No German bomber can even spot the cathedral (not even hit it), if you have British and US Interceptors swarming France 24/7 (like the beginning of '45).



    Yes, ground-support Anti Air would be nice, but the french can't provide that apparently so the fighters alone would have to do (and will do, assuming late-war setups).



    If that counts as "anti air available", then the cathedral is 100% lost, as @Trish laid out with much detail.
    All the other stuff other people mention here won't work, because they assume either night-raids or super-high-flying bombers, neither of which will be happening here.



    If by "no maps" you mean that Germany magically can't produce anything maplike, they'll just level Paris and call it a day, they'll hit the cathedral eventually.
    Or use StuKas, with which they can hit it with bare eyes.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      4












      $begingroup$

      Since your entire premise is ridiculous [aka unsolveable] (especially the "no maps" with photography existent...) I'll save the cathedral with some technicality:




      together with help from the Allies, prevent the bombers from spotting the cathedral?




      ENHANCE




      together with help from the Allies




      And there you go.



      No German bomber can even spot the cathedral (not even hit it), if you have British and US Interceptors swarming France 24/7 (like the beginning of '45).



      Yes, ground-support Anti Air would be nice, but the french can't provide that apparently so the fighters alone would have to do (and will do, assuming late-war setups).



      If that counts as "anti air available", then the cathedral is 100% lost, as @Trish laid out with much detail.
      All the other stuff other people mention here won't work, because they assume either night-raids or super-high-flying bombers, neither of which will be happening here.



      If by "no maps" you mean that Germany magically can't produce anything maplike, they'll just level Paris and call it a day, they'll hit the cathedral eventually.
      Or use StuKas, with which they can hit it with bare eyes.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        4












        4








        4





        $begingroup$

        Since your entire premise is ridiculous [aka unsolveable] (especially the "no maps" with photography existent...) I'll save the cathedral with some technicality:




        together with help from the Allies, prevent the bombers from spotting the cathedral?




        ENHANCE




        together with help from the Allies




        And there you go.



        No German bomber can even spot the cathedral (not even hit it), if you have British and US Interceptors swarming France 24/7 (like the beginning of '45).



        Yes, ground-support Anti Air would be nice, but the french can't provide that apparently so the fighters alone would have to do (and will do, assuming late-war setups).



        If that counts as "anti air available", then the cathedral is 100% lost, as @Trish laid out with much detail.
        All the other stuff other people mention here won't work, because they assume either night-raids or super-high-flying bombers, neither of which will be happening here.



        If by "no maps" you mean that Germany magically can't produce anything maplike, they'll just level Paris and call it a day, they'll hit the cathedral eventually.
        Or use StuKas, with which they can hit it with bare eyes.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Since your entire premise is ridiculous [aka unsolveable] (especially the "no maps" with photography existent...) I'll save the cathedral with some technicality:




        together with help from the Allies, prevent the bombers from spotting the cathedral?




        ENHANCE




        together with help from the Allies




        And there you go.



        No German bomber can even spot the cathedral (not even hit it), if you have British and US Interceptors swarming France 24/7 (like the beginning of '45).



        Yes, ground-support Anti Air would be nice, but the french can't provide that apparently so the fighters alone would have to do (and will do, assuming late-war setups).



        If that counts as "anti air available", then the cathedral is 100% lost, as @Trish laid out with much detail.
        All the other stuff other people mention here won't work, because they assume either night-raids or super-high-flying bombers, neither of which will be happening here.



        If by "no maps" you mean that Germany magically can't produce anything maplike, they'll just level Paris and call it a day, they'll hit the cathedral eventually.
        Or use StuKas, with which they can hit it with bare eyes.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Jun 5 at 12:48









        Trish

        4,5841330




        4,5841330










        answered Jun 5 at 12:11









        HobbamokHobbamok

        1,799412




        1,799412





















            3












            $begingroup$

            Similar to SZCZERZO KŁY: While these events were occurring in Paris, Boeing built a fake neighborhood on the roof of an airplane plant.



            https://99percentinvisible.org/article/prop-town-fake-rooftop-suburb-hid-whole-wwii-airplane-factory/



            This neighborhood (made by a Hollywood set designer) was half the size of Notre Dame's island, but you'd only need to cover the cathedral and some of its surroundings, which could be much smaller.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              So the bomber crews don't find ANY cathedral the first time, go back. The commander concludes that it's hidden and Germany simply levels Paris. [But nice Idea and example]
              $endgroup$
              – Hobbamok
              Jun 5 at 12:13







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I think you'd also have to create a fake cathedral on the other island, and ideally cover the river to the south of the real island with more fake buildings.
              $endgroup$
              – Robin Bennett
              Jun 5 at 13:01






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @RobinBennett Problem there is that the other island is dangerously close given the inaccuracy of unguided air dropped bombs, ran into a similar issues with my own thinking that you would need to create a decoy as without one any attempt to obscure the target is going to look suspicious. But yeah ideally making full use of scenario fulfilment by giving them a target so they don't look too close at anything else going on nearby as they are too focused on the mission would make sense. A flimsy decoy of a building is pretty easy but rivers not so much so might have to just risk it.
              $endgroup$
              – MttJocy
              Jun 7 at 9:38
















            3












            $begingroup$

            Similar to SZCZERZO KŁY: While these events were occurring in Paris, Boeing built a fake neighborhood on the roof of an airplane plant.



            https://99percentinvisible.org/article/prop-town-fake-rooftop-suburb-hid-whole-wwii-airplane-factory/



            This neighborhood (made by a Hollywood set designer) was half the size of Notre Dame's island, but you'd only need to cover the cathedral and some of its surroundings, which could be much smaller.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              So the bomber crews don't find ANY cathedral the first time, go back. The commander concludes that it's hidden and Germany simply levels Paris. [But nice Idea and example]
              $endgroup$
              – Hobbamok
              Jun 5 at 12:13







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I think you'd also have to create a fake cathedral on the other island, and ideally cover the river to the south of the real island with more fake buildings.
              $endgroup$
              – Robin Bennett
              Jun 5 at 13:01






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @RobinBennett Problem there is that the other island is dangerously close given the inaccuracy of unguided air dropped bombs, ran into a similar issues with my own thinking that you would need to create a decoy as without one any attempt to obscure the target is going to look suspicious. But yeah ideally making full use of scenario fulfilment by giving them a target so they don't look too close at anything else going on nearby as they are too focused on the mission would make sense. A flimsy decoy of a building is pretty easy but rivers not so much so might have to just risk it.
              $endgroup$
              – MttJocy
              Jun 7 at 9:38














            3












            3








            3





            $begingroup$

            Similar to SZCZERZO KŁY: While these events were occurring in Paris, Boeing built a fake neighborhood on the roof of an airplane plant.



            https://99percentinvisible.org/article/prop-town-fake-rooftop-suburb-hid-whole-wwii-airplane-factory/



            This neighborhood (made by a Hollywood set designer) was half the size of Notre Dame's island, but you'd only need to cover the cathedral and some of its surroundings, which could be much smaller.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Similar to SZCZERZO KŁY: While these events were occurring in Paris, Boeing built a fake neighborhood on the roof of an airplane plant.



            https://99percentinvisible.org/article/prop-town-fake-rooftop-suburb-hid-whole-wwii-airplane-factory/



            This neighborhood (made by a Hollywood set designer) was half the size of Notre Dame's island, but you'd only need to cover the cathedral and some of its surroundings, which could be much smaller.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Jun 5 at 5:56









            Shawn V. WilsonShawn V. Wilson

            40528




            40528







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              So the bomber crews don't find ANY cathedral the first time, go back. The commander concludes that it's hidden and Germany simply levels Paris. [But nice Idea and example]
              $endgroup$
              – Hobbamok
              Jun 5 at 12:13







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I think you'd also have to create a fake cathedral on the other island, and ideally cover the river to the south of the real island with more fake buildings.
              $endgroup$
              – Robin Bennett
              Jun 5 at 13:01






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @RobinBennett Problem there is that the other island is dangerously close given the inaccuracy of unguided air dropped bombs, ran into a similar issues with my own thinking that you would need to create a decoy as without one any attempt to obscure the target is going to look suspicious. But yeah ideally making full use of scenario fulfilment by giving them a target so they don't look too close at anything else going on nearby as they are too focused on the mission would make sense. A flimsy decoy of a building is pretty easy but rivers not so much so might have to just risk it.
              $endgroup$
              – MttJocy
              Jun 7 at 9:38













            • 1




              $begingroup$
              So the bomber crews don't find ANY cathedral the first time, go back. The commander concludes that it's hidden and Germany simply levels Paris. [But nice Idea and example]
              $endgroup$
              – Hobbamok
              Jun 5 at 12:13







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I think you'd also have to create a fake cathedral on the other island, and ideally cover the river to the south of the real island with more fake buildings.
              $endgroup$
              – Robin Bennett
              Jun 5 at 13:01






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @RobinBennett Problem there is that the other island is dangerously close given the inaccuracy of unguided air dropped bombs, ran into a similar issues with my own thinking that you would need to create a decoy as without one any attempt to obscure the target is going to look suspicious. But yeah ideally making full use of scenario fulfilment by giving them a target so they don't look too close at anything else going on nearby as they are too focused on the mission would make sense. A flimsy decoy of a building is pretty easy but rivers not so much so might have to just risk it.
              $endgroup$
              – MttJocy
              Jun 7 at 9:38








            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            So the bomber crews don't find ANY cathedral the first time, go back. The commander concludes that it's hidden and Germany simply levels Paris. [But nice Idea and example]
            $endgroup$
            – Hobbamok
            Jun 5 at 12:13





            $begingroup$
            So the bomber crews don't find ANY cathedral the first time, go back. The commander concludes that it's hidden and Germany simply levels Paris. [But nice Idea and example]
            $endgroup$
            – Hobbamok
            Jun 5 at 12:13





            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            I think you'd also have to create a fake cathedral on the other island, and ideally cover the river to the south of the real island with more fake buildings.
            $endgroup$
            – Robin Bennett
            Jun 5 at 13:01




            $begingroup$
            I think you'd also have to create a fake cathedral on the other island, and ideally cover the river to the south of the real island with more fake buildings.
            $endgroup$
            – Robin Bennett
            Jun 5 at 13:01




            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            @RobinBennett Problem there is that the other island is dangerously close given the inaccuracy of unguided air dropped bombs, ran into a similar issues with my own thinking that you would need to create a decoy as without one any attempt to obscure the target is going to look suspicious. But yeah ideally making full use of scenario fulfilment by giving them a target so they don't look too close at anything else going on nearby as they are too focused on the mission would make sense. A flimsy decoy of a building is pretty easy but rivers not so much so might have to just risk it.
            $endgroup$
            – MttJocy
            Jun 7 at 9:38





            $begingroup$
            @RobinBennett Problem there is that the other island is dangerously close given the inaccuracy of unguided air dropped bombs, ran into a similar issues with my own thinking that you would need to create a decoy as without one any attempt to obscure the target is going to look suspicious. But yeah ideally making full use of scenario fulfilment by giving them a target so they don't look too close at anything else going on nearby as they are too focused on the mission would make sense. A flimsy decoy of a building is pretty easy but rivers not so much so might have to just risk it.
            $endgroup$
            – MttJocy
            Jun 7 at 9:38












            2












            $begingroup$

            The french (we :)) already did it during the first world war.



            At the end of WWI, to avoid bombardment on Paris, the french did a "fake Paris" in countryside, reproducting the great landmarks of the city and mimicking the night life of Paris.



            It was ALL about the lights on grounds, because bombers were coming at night to avoid anti air defenses. I don't think this perfectly answer your question because of this, but maybe it could give you some cool ideas.



            Here's a english link for more informations :
            https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/8879053/Second-Paris-built-towards-end-of-First-World-War-to-fool-Germans.html






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              "One of the reasons for the high number of casualties was because bombing raids were a relative novelty in Britain, with many civilians crowding together to watch them."....
              $endgroup$
              – Muuski
              Jun 6 at 14:16






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Just like the top-voted answer about the Egyptian fake city: This wouldn't help at all, since without AA, the bombing would certainly NOT be conducted at night. Just like the late-war American bombers flew in daylight
              $endgroup$
              – Hobbamok
              Jun 6 at 17:02










            • $begingroup$
              maybe it's very cloudy
              $endgroup$
              – GlorfSf
              Jun 7 at 7:21










            • $begingroup$
              very cloudy and bad weather won't hold up for 3 consecutive weeks.
              $endgroup$
              – Trish
              Jun 7 at 10:44










            • $begingroup$
              @Trish Maybe not in Paris. But Seattle, from what I've heard....
              $endgroup$
              – Shawn V. Wilson
              Jun 8 at 15:44















            2












            $begingroup$

            The french (we :)) already did it during the first world war.



            At the end of WWI, to avoid bombardment on Paris, the french did a "fake Paris" in countryside, reproducting the great landmarks of the city and mimicking the night life of Paris.



            It was ALL about the lights on grounds, because bombers were coming at night to avoid anti air defenses. I don't think this perfectly answer your question because of this, but maybe it could give you some cool ideas.



            Here's a english link for more informations :
            https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/8879053/Second-Paris-built-towards-end-of-First-World-War-to-fool-Germans.html






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              "One of the reasons for the high number of casualties was because bombing raids were a relative novelty in Britain, with many civilians crowding together to watch them."....
              $endgroup$
              – Muuski
              Jun 6 at 14:16






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Just like the top-voted answer about the Egyptian fake city: This wouldn't help at all, since without AA, the bombing would certainly NOT be conducted at night. Just like the late-war American bombers flew in daylight
              $endgroup$
              – Hobbamok
              Jun 6 at 17:02










            • $begingroup$
              maybe it's very cloudy
              $endgroup$
              – GlorfSf
              Jun 7 at 7:21










            • $begingroup$
              very cloudy and bad weather won't hold up for 3 consecutive weeks.
              $endgroup$
              – Trish
              Jun 7 at 10:44










            • $begingroup$
              @Trish Maybe not in Paris. But Seattle, from what I've heard....
              $endgroup$
              – Shawn V. Wilson
              Jun 8 at 15:44













            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            The french (we :)) already did it during the first world war.



            At the end of WWI, to avoid bombardment on Paris, the french did a "fake Paris" in countryside, reproducting the great landmarks of the city and mimicking the night life of Paris.



            It was ALL about the lights on grounds, because bombers were coming at night to avoid anti air defenses. I don't think this perfectly answer your question because of this, but maybe it could give you some cool ideas.



            Here's a english link for more informations :
            https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/8879053/Second-Paris-built-towards-end-of-First-World-War-to-fool-Germans.html






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            The french (we :)) already did it during the first world war.



            At the end of WWI, to avoid bombardment on Paris, the french did a "fake Paris" in countryside, reproducting the great landmarks of the city and mimicking the night life of Paris.



            It was ALL about the lights on grounds, because bombers were coming at night to avoid anti air defenses. I don't think this perfectly answer your question because of this, but maybe it could give you some cool ideas.



            Here's a english link for more informations :
            https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/8879053/Second-Paris-built-towards-end-of-First-World-War-to-fool-Germans.html







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Jun 6 at 13:52









            GlorfSfGlorfSf

            37717




            37717











            • $begingroup$
              "One of the reasons for the high number of casualties was because bombing raids were a relative novelty in Britain, with many civilians crowding together to watch them."....
              $endgroup$
              – Muuski
              Jun 6 at 14:16






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Just like the top-voted answer about the Egyptian fake city: This wouldn't help at all, since without AA, the bombing would certainly NOT be conducted at night. Just like the late-war American bombers flew in daylight
              $endgroup$
              – Hobbamok
              Jun 6 at 17:02










            • $begingroup$
              maybe it's very cloudy
              $endgroup$
              – GlorfSf
              Jun 7 at 7:21










            • $begingroup$
              very cloudy and bad weather won't hold up for 3 consecutive weeks.
              $endgroup$
              – Trish
              Jun 7 at 10:44










            • $begingroup$
              @Trish Maybe not in Paris. But Seattle, from what I've heard....
              $endgroup$
              – Shawn V. Wilson
              Jun 8 at 15:44
















            • $begingroup$
              "One of the reasons for the high number of casualties was because bombing raids were a relative novelty in Britain, with many civilians crowding together to watch them."....
              $endgroup$
              – Muuski
              Jun 6 at 14:16






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Just like the top-voted answer about the Egyptian fake city: This wouldn't help at all, since without AA, the bombing would certainly NOT be conducted at night. Just like the late-war American bombers flew in daylight
              $endgroup$
              – Hobbamok
              Jun 6 at 17:02










            • $begingroup$
              maybe it's very cloudy
              $endgroup$
              – GlorfSf
              Jun 7 at 7:21










            • $begingroup$
              very cloudy and bad weather won't hold up for 3 consecutive weeks.
              $endgroup$
              – Trish
              Jun 7 at 10:44










            • $begingroup$
              @Trish Maybe not in Paris. But Seattle, from what I've heard....
              $endgroup$
              – Shawn V. Wilson
              Jun 8 at 15:44















            $begingroup$
            "One of the reasons for the high number of casualties was because bombing raids were a relative novelty in Britain, with many civilians crowding together to watch them."....
            $endgroup$
            – Muuski
            Jun 6 at 14:16




            $begingroup$
            "One of the reasons for the high number of casualties was because bombing raids were a relative novelty in Britain, with many civilians crowding together to watch them."....
            $endgroup$
            – Muuski
            Jun 6 at 14:16




            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            Just like the top-voted answer about the Egyptian fake city: This wouldn't help at all, since without AA, the bombing would certainly NOT be conducted at night. Just like the late-war American bombers flew in daylight
            $endgroup$
            – Hobbamok
            Jun 6 at 17:02




            $begingroup$
            Just like the top-voted answer about the Egyptian fake city: This wouldn't help at all, since without AA, the bombing would certainly NOT be conducted at night. Just like the late-war American bombers flew in daylight
            $endgroup$
            – Hobbamok
            Jun 6 at 17:02












            $begingroup$
            maybe it's very cloudy
            $endgroup$
            – GlorfSf
            Jun 7 at 7:21




            $begingroup$
            maybe it's very cloudy
            $endgroup$
            – GlorfSf
            Jun 7 at 7:21












            $begingroup$
            very cloudy and bad weather won't hold up for 3 consecutive weeks.
            $endgroup$
            – Trish
            Jun 7 at 10:44




            $begingroup$
            very cloudy and bad weather won't hold up for 3 consecutive weeks.
            $endgroup$
            – Trish
            Jun 7 at 10:44












            $begingroup$
            @Trish Maybe not in Paris. But Seattle, from what I've heard....
            $endgroup$
            – Shawn V. Wilson
            Jun 8 at 15:44




            $begingroup$
            @Trish Maybe not in Paris. But Seattle, from what I've heard....
            $endgroup$
            – Shawn V. Wilson
            Jun 8 at 15:44

















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f148292%2fhow-to-hide-an-urban-landmark%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Wikipedia:Vital articles Мазмуну Biography - Өмүр баян Philosophy and psychology - Философия жана психология Religion - Дин Social sciences - Коомдук илимдер Language and literature - Тил жана адабият Science - Илим Technology - Технология Arts and recreation - Искусство жана эс алуу History and geography - Тарых жана география Навигация менюсу

            Bruxelas-Capital Índice Historia | Composición | Situación lingüística | Clima | Cidades irmandadas | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióneO uso das linguas en Bruxelas e a situación do neerlandés"Rexión de Bruxelas Capital"o orixinalSitio da rexiónPáxina de Bruselas no sitio da Oficina de Promoción Turística de Valonia e BruxelasMapa Interactivo da Rexión de Bruxelas-CapitaleeWorldCat332144929079854441105155190212ID28008674080552-90000 0001 0666 3698n94104302ID540940339365017018237

            What should I write in an apology letter, since I have decided not to join a company after accepting an offer letterShould I keep looking after accepting a job offer?What should I do when I've been verbally told I would get an offer letter, but still haven't gotten one after 4 weeks?Do I accept an offer from a company that I am not likely to join?New job hasn't confirmed starting date and I want to give current employer as much notice as possibleHow should I address my manager in my resignation letter?HR delayed background verification, now jobless as resignedNo email communication after accepting a formal written offer. How should I phrase the call?What should I do if after receiving a verbal offer letter I am informed that my written job offer is put on hold due to some internal issues?Should I inform the current employer that I am about to resign within 1-2 weeks since I have signed the offer letter and waiting for visa?What company will do, if I send their offer letter to another company