Is it convenient to ask the journal's editor for two additional days to complete a review? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHow long is reasonable to wait for reply from an editor?How much time should one spend refereeing a paper?Should I choose the same editor for two papers?Slightly revised version of submitted paper two days afterwards: will the editor be annoyed?Referee report ignored and not sent to authorsFirstly manuscipt 'rejected' and then status changed to 'revise'Elsevier Editorial System: is this scam?Editor is asking for two referees and single columnResubmitting a Paper to a Mathematics Journal After Questionable RejectionHow is the Journal for an annual Review Chosen
Direct Implications Between USA and UK in Event of No-Deal Brexit
How exploitable/balanced is this homebrew spell: Spell Permanency?
Incomplete cube
What is Decreasing Arithmetic progression?
Could you use a laser beam as a modulated carrier wave for radio signal?
Another proof that dividing by 0 does not exist -- is it right?
It it possible to avoid kiwi.com's automatic online check-in and instead do it manually by yourself?
Is it possible to make a 9x9 table fit within the default margins?
How to pronounce fünf in 45
How can a day be of 24 hours?
Compensation for working overtime on Saturdays
Is it reasonable to ask other researchers to send me their previous grant applications?
Would a grinding machine be a simple and workable propulsion system for an interplanetary spacecraft?
Is there a rule of thumb for determining the amount one should accept for of a settlement offer?
Trying to insert a background image via TikZ results in extra white-space around the corners
How can I force the size of an int for debugging purposes?
How to implement Comparable so it is consistent with identity-equality
Ising model simulation
Can you teleport closer to a creature you are Frightened of?
How to show a landlord what we have in savings?
What does it mean 'exit 1' for a job status after rclone sync
How to avoid supervisors with prejudiced views?
Is the offspring between a demon and a celestial possible? If so what is it called and is it in a book somewhere?
How seriously should I take size and weight limits of hand luggage?
Is it convenient to ask the journal's editor for two additional days to complete a review?
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHow long is reasonable to wait for reply from an editor?How much time should one spend refereeing a paper?Should I choose the same editor for two papers?Slightly revised version of submitted paper two days afterwards: will the editor be annoyed?Referee report ignored and not sent to authorsFirstly manuscipt 'rejected' and then status changed to 'revise'Elsevier Editorial System: is this scam?Editor is asking for two referees and single columnResubmitting a Paper to a Mathematics Journal After Questionable RejectionHow is the Journal for an annual Review Chosen
I am assigned as a reviewer of an article for IEEE TNNLS (computer science), but unfortunately, I would be super busy during the week of the deadline. In fact, I need to submit a paper and also two postdoc applications during the same week.
I'm already trying to do as much as I can before that week, but it'd make things much easier (with better quality) if I can postpone the review at least for two more days. So, I like to know if it looks unprofessional to ask the editor for that extension and whether it'd damage my review performance/reputation in that journal?
journals peer-review review-articles
add a comment |
I am assigned as a reviewer of an article for IEEE TNNLS (computer science), but unfortunately, I would be super busy during the week of the deadline. In fact, I need to submit a paper and also two postdoc applications during the same week.
I'm already trying to do as much as I can before that week, but it'd make things much easier (with better quality) if I can postpone the review at least for two more days. So, I like to know if it looks unprofessional to ask the editor for that extension and whether it'd damage my review performance/reputation in that journal?
journals peer-review review-articles
16
A two day extension is almost nothing compared to the significant work of finding a new reviewer. I would just ask (in fact I've done so multiple times). They won't put you on a blacklist for such a reasonable request.
– Roland
2 days ago
1
Yes, you can I have asked an editor to extend the review and he did it, there is no worries.
– Monkia
yesterday
6
I never ask. I submit my reviews whenever I have time.
– Prof. Santa Claus
yesterday
2
@Prof.SantaClaus I may do that when I become a professor as big as Santa is! :D
– Babak
yesterday
add a comment |
I am assigned as a reviewer of an article for IEEE TNNLS (computer science), but unfortunately, I would be super busy during the week of the deadline. In fact, I need to submit a paper and also two postdoc applications during the same week.
I'm already trying to do as much as I can before that week, but it'd make things much easier (with better quality) if I can postpone the review at least for two more days. So, I like to know if it looks unprofessional to ask the editor for that extension and whether it'd damage my review performance/reputation in that journal?
journals peer-review review-articles
I am assigned as a reviewer of an article for IEEE TNNLS (computer science), but unfortunately, I would be super busy during the week of the deadline. In fact, I need to submit a paper and also two postdoc applications during the same week.
I'm already trying to do as much as I can before that week, but it'd make things much easier (with better quality) if I can postpone the review at least for two more days. So, I like to know if it looks unprofessional to ask the editor for that extension and whether it'd damage my review performance/reputation in that journal?
journals peer-review review-articles
journals peer-review review-articles
edited yesterday
Wrzlprmft♦
34.6k11109185
34.6k11109185
asked 2 days ago
BabakBabak
1,5271829
1,5271829
16
A two day extension is almost nothing compared to the significant work of finding a new reviewer. I would just ask (in fact I've done so multiple times). They won't put you on a blacklist for such a reasonable request.
– Roland
2 days ago
1
Yes, you can I have asked an editor to extend the review and he did it, there is no worries.
– Monkia
yesterday
6
I never ask. I submit my reviews whenever I have time.
– Prof. Santa Claus
yesterday
2
@Prof.SantaClaus I may do that when I become a professor as big as Santa is! :D
– Babak
yesterday
add a comment |
16
A two day extension is almost nothing compared to the significant work of finding a new reviewer. I would just ask (in fact I've done so multiple times). They won't put you on a blacklist for such a reasonable request.
– Roland
2 days ago
1
Yes, you can I have asked an editor to extend the review and he did it, there is no worries.
– Monkia
yesterday
6
I never ask. I submit my reviews whenever I have time.
– Prof. Santa Claus
yesterday
2
@Prof.SantaClaus I may do that when I become a professor as big as Santa is! :D
– Babak
yesterday
16
16
A two day extension is almost nothing compared to the significant work of finding a new reviewer. I would just ask (in fact I've done so multiple times). They won't put you on a blacklist for such a reasonable request.
– Roland
2 days ago
A two day extension is almost nothing compared to the significant work of finding a new reviewer. I would just ask (in fact I've done so multiple times). They won't put you on a blacklist for such a reasonable request.
– Roland
2 days ago
1
1
Yes, you can I have asked an editor to extend the review and he did it, there is no worries.
– Monkia
yesterday
Yes, you can I have asked an editor to extend the review and he did it, there is no worries.
– Monkia
yesterday
6
6
I never ask. I submit my reviews whenever I have time.
– Prof. Santa Claus
yesterday
I never ask. I submit my reviews whenever I have time.
– Prof. Santa Claus
yesterday
2
2
@Prof.SantaClaus I may do that when I become a professor as big as Santa is! :D
– Babak
yesterday
@Prof.SantaClaus I may do that when I become a professor as big as Santa is! :D
– Babak
yesterday
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Getting a review in two days late for a journal article is pretty common. I wouldn't worry about anything less than being a week late. For conferences, deadlines can be tighter, but 2 days is nothing. Ideally you would let the editor know your review will be a couple of days late, but even if you didn't, it is not the end of the world.
add a comment |
I wouldn't even ask. Just "tell".
Send a short email saying you will send the review a week later (more time than needed, don't want to come back in 2 days again). Don't phrase the email in a manner that requires a response from the editor--tell, don't ask (cut the back and forth chatter).
If the editor wants/needs to pull the paper, he will do so. But it's very unlikely he will. But just let him do what he does.
In addition, I would be practical and do a simple review. I love doing extensive murder board reviews. But you need to concentrate on your own stuff. There is probably an 80-20 rule where you can give 80% of the key improvements with 20% of the text and parsing time. In particular, if you are recommending rejection, I would be economical with your time and not investment much in improvement recommendations.
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
14
"Ask" will be interpreted as "tell" and is far more polite.
– Bob Brown
yesterday
@BobBrown: I don't mind asking, but should I also apologize for the inconvenience? ;)
– Babak
yesterday
1
@Babak - You can add that sentence in the same formally-ask, but in-reality-tell email. But that's just a politeness gesture. In reality, there is nothing in here to feel apologetic for. :)
– 299792458
yesterday
@Babak If you like, but don't make a big deal of it. You are still "telling," after all. The point is to do so politely.
– Bob Brown
yesterday
add a comment |
When I ask for an extension, I usually ask for a substantial one, i.e. one week not just 2 days. This way, if I need more than 2 days for some unforeseen reason I don’t have to ask for another extension. Moreover if the editor is really tight she/he can negotiate down to 2 days and everybody is happy.
Dear editor,
Due to unforeseen circumstances I can only guarantee submission of my report by[deadline+1 week]. I trust this firm new submission date is acceptable to the Journal.
2
As an editor, I want people to ask for only what they need.
– jakebeal
yesterday
1
@jakebeal so do I but I would rather not deal with people asking for a 2-day extension every 2nd day: I'm more interested in a firm deadline than a moving one.
– ZeroTheHero
yesterday
@jakebeal People know only a subjective probability distribution of the time they need, not a specific value. Which quantile (or other statistic) do you want them to ask? It seems reasonable that if someone expects the review to take 2 days on average, there's still a 1/5 chance that it will take 1 week, and in that case the editor might like them to ask for the week directly.
– JiK
12 hours ago
@jakebeal I was also advised, and now practice, asking for approximately max(3days, X*30%) more extra time, rounded to the nearest week, if I estimated I needed X time to finish, to give myself a small buffer and avoid asking twice. So two days are likely to become a week, a week 10 days, and 3 months (very extensive revision, happened once) 4 months. I will, if I can, submit sooner, but I'll also be very happy if I realize I underestimated and can now actually still finish at a reasonable pace rather than forgoing sleep for the last 3 days before the submission.
– penelope
8 hours ago
@ZeroTheHero Actually, I'd still prefer to have somebody give me their honest estimate and then bug them again if they don't deliver. At least I know I've got their attention, rather than being shuffled into the "don't have to think about it this week" pile, which is likely to lead to asking for another week the next week.
– jakebeal
6 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "415"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f127299%2fis-it-convenient-to-ask-the-journals-editor-for-two-additional-days-to-complete%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Getting a review in two days late for a journal article is pretty common. I wouldn't worry about anything less than being a week late. For conferences, deadlines can be tighter, but 2 days is nothing. Ideally you would let the editor know your review will be a couple of days late, but even if you didn't, it is not the end of the world.
add a comment |
Getting a review in two days late for a journal article is pretty common. I wouldn't worry about anything less than being a week late. For conferences, deadlines can be tighter, but 2 days is nothing. Ideally you would let the editor know your review will be a couple of days late, but even if you didn't, it is not the end of the world.
add a comment |
Getting a review in two days late for a journal article is pretty common. I wouldn't worry about anything less than being a week late. For conferences, deadlines can be tighter, but 2 days is nothing. Ideally you would let the editor know your review will be a couple of days late, but even if you didn't, it is not the end of the world.
Getting a review in two days late for a journal article is pretty common. I wouldn't worry about anything less than being a week late. For conferences, deadlines can be tighter, but 2 days is nothing. Ideally you would let the editor know your review will be a couple of days late, but even if you didn't, it is not the end of the world.
answered yesterday
StrongBad♦StrongBad
86.5k24216423
86.5k24216423
add a comment |
add a comment |
I wouldn't even ask. Just "tell".
Send a short email saying you will send the review a week later (more time than needed, don't want to come back in 2 days again). Don't phrase the email in a manner that requires a response from the editor--tell, don't ask (cut the back and forth chatter).
If the editor wants/needs to pull the paper, he will do so. But it's very unlikely he will. But just let him do what he does.
In addition, I would be practical and do a simple review. I love doing extensive murder board reviews. But you need to concentrate on your own stuff. There is probably an 80-20 rule where you can give 80% of the key improvements with 20% of the text and parsing time. In particular, if you are recommending rejection, I would be economical with your time and not investment much in improvement recommendations.
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
14
"Ask" will be interpreted as "tell" and is far more polite.
– Bob Brown
yesterday
@BobBrown: I don't mind asking, but should I also apologize for the inconvenience? ;)
– Babak
yesterday
1
@Babak - You can add that sentence in the same formally-ask, but in-reality-tell email. But that's just a politeness gesture. In reality, there is nothing in here to feel apologetic for. :)
– 299792458
yesterday
@Babak If you like, but don't make a big deal of it. You are still "telling," after all. The point is to do so politely.
– Bob Brown
yesterday
add a comment |
I wouldn't even ask. Just "tell".
Send a short email saying you will send the review a week later (more time than needed, don't want to come back in 2 days again). Don't phrase the email in a manner that requires a response from the editor--tell, don't ask (cut the back and forth chatter).
If the editor wants/needs to pull the paper, he will do so. But it's very unlikely he will. But just let him do what he does.
In addition, I would be practical and do a simple review. I love doing extensive murder board reviews. But you need to concentrate on your own stuff. There is probably an 80-20 rule where you can give 80% of the key improvements with 20% of the text and parsing time. In particular, if you are recommending rejection, I would be economical with your time and not investment much in improvement recommendations.
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
14
"Ask" will be interpreted as "tell" and is far more polite.
– Bob Brown
yesterday
@BobBrown: I don't mind asking, but should I also apologize for the inconvenience? ;)
– Babak
yesterday
1
@Babak - You can add that sentence in the same formally-ask, but in-reality-tell email. But that's just a politeness gesture. In reality, there is nothing in here to feel apologetic for. :)
– 299792458
yesterday
@Babak If you like, but don't make a big deal of it. You are still "telling," after all. The point is to do so politely.
– Bob Brown
yesterday
add a comment |
I wouldn't even ask. Just "tell".
Send a short email saying you will send the review a week later (more time than needed, don't want to come back in 2 days again). Don't phrase the email in a manner that requires a response from the editor--tell, don't ask (cut the back and forth chatter).
If the editor wants/needs to pull the paper, he will do so. But it's very unlikely he will. But just let him do what he does.
In addition, I would be practical and do a simple review. I love doing extensive murder board reviews. But you need to concentrate on your own stuff. There is probably an 80-20 rule where you can give 80% of the key improvements with 20% of the text and parsing time. In particular, if you are recommending rejection, I would be economical with your time and not investment much in improvement recommendations.
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I wouldn't even ask. Just "tell".
Send a short email saying you will send the review a week later (more time than needed, don't want to come back in 2 days again). Don't phrase the email in a manner that requires a response from the editor--tell, don't ask (cut the back and forth chatter).
If the editor wants/needs to pull the paper, he will do so. But it's very unlikely he will. But just let him do what he does.
In addition, I would be practical and do a simple review. I love doing extensive murder board reviews. But you need to concentrate on your own stuff. There is probably an 80-20 rule where you can give 80% of the key improvements with 20% of the text and parsing time. In particular, if you are recommending rejection, I would be economical with your time and not investment much in improvement recommendations.
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered yesterday
guestguest
1211
1211
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
14
"Ask" will be interpreted as "tell" and is far more polite.
– Bob Brown
yesterday
@BobBrown: I don't mind asking, but should I also apologize for the inconvenience? ;)
– Babak
yesterday
1
@Babak - You can add that sentence in the same formally-ask, but in-reality-tell email. But that's just a politeness gesture. In reality, there is nothing in here to feel apologetic for. :)
– 299792458
yesterday
@Babak If you like, but don't make a big deal of it. You are still "telling," after all. The point is to do so politely.
– Bob Brown
yesterday
add a comment |
14
"Ask" will be interpreted as "tell" and is far more polite.
– Bob Brown
yesterday
@BobBrown: I don't mind asking, but should I also apologize for the inconvenience? ;)
– Babak
yesterday
1
@Babak - You can add that sentence in the same formally-ask, but in-reality-tell email. But that's just a politeness gesture. In reality, there is nothing in here to feel apologetic for. :)
– 299792458
yesterday
@Babak If you like, but don't make a big deal of it. You are still "telling," after all. The point is to do so politely.
– Bob Brown
yesterday
14
14
"Ask" will be interpreted as "tell" and is far more polite.
– Bob Brown
yesterday
"Ask" will be interpreted as "tell" and is far more polite.
– Bob Brown
yesterday
@BobBrown: I don't mind asking, but should I also apologize for the inconvenience? ;)
– Babak
yesterday
@BobBrown: I don't mind asking, but should I also apologize for the inconvenience? ;)
– Babak
yesterday
1
1
@Babak - You can add that sentence in the same formally-ask, but in-reality-tell email. But that's just a politeness gesture. In reality, there is nothing in here to feel apologetic for. :)
– 299792458
yesterday
@Babak - You can add that sentence in the same formally-ask, but in-reality-tell email. But that's just a politeness gesture. In reality, there is nothing in here to feel apologetic for. :)
– 299792458
yesterday
@Babak If you like, but don't make a big deal of it. You are still "telling," after all. The point is to do so politely.
– Bob Brown
yesterday
@Babak If you like, but don't make a big deal of it. You are still "telling," after all. The point is to do so politely.
– Bob Brown
yesterday
add a comment |
When I ask for an extension, I usually ask for a substantial one, i.e. one week not just 2 days. This way, if I need more than 2 days for some unforeseen reason I don’t have to ask for another extension. Moreover if the editor is really tight she/he can negotiate down to 2 days and everybody is happy.
Dear editor,
Due to unforeseen circumstances I can only guarantee submission of my report by[deadline+1 week]. I trust this firm new submission date is acceptable to the Journal.
2
As an editor, I want people to ask for only what they need.
– jakebeal
yesterday
1
@jakebeal so do I but I would rather not deal with people asking for a 2-day extension every 2nd day: I'm more interested in a firm deadline than a moving one.
– ZeroTheHero
yesterday
@jakebeal People know only a subjective probability distribution of the time they need, not a specific value. Which quantile (or other statistic) do you want them to ask? It seems reasonable that if someone expects the review to take 2 days on average, there's still a 1/5 chance that it will take 1 week, and in that case the editor might like them to ask for the week directly.
– JiK
12 hours ago
@jakebeal I was also advised, and now practice, asking for approximately max(3days, X*30%) more extra time, rounded to the nearest week, if I estimated I needed X time to finish, to give myself a small buffer and avoid asking twice. So two days are likely to become a week, a week 10 days, and 3 months (very extensive revision, happened once) 4 months. I will, if I can, submit sooner, but I'll also be very happy if I realize I underestimated and can now actually still finish at a reasonable pace rather than forgoing sleep for the last 3 days before the submission.
– penelope
8 hours ago
@ZeroTheHero Actually, I'd still prefer to have somebody give me their honest estimate and then bug them again if they don't deliver. At least I know I've got their attention, rather than being shuffled into the "don't have to think about it this week" pile, which is likely to lead to asking for another week the next week.
– jakebeal
6 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
When I ask for an extension, I usually ask for a substantial one, i.e. one week not just 2 days. This way, if I need more than 2 days for some unforeseen reason I don’t have to ask for another extension. Moreover if the editor is really tight she/he can negotiate down to 2 days and everybody is happy.
Dear editor,
Due to unforeseen circumstances I can only guarantee submission of my report by[deadline+1 week]. I trust this firm new submission date is acceptable to the Journal.
2
As an editor, I want people to ask for only what they need.
– jakebeal
yesterday
1
@jakebeal so do I but I would rather not deal with people asking for a 2-day extension every 2nd day: I'm more interested in a firm deadline than a moving one.
– ZeroTheHero
yesterday
@jakebeal People know only a subjective probability distribution of the time they need, not a specific value. Which quantile (or other statistic) do you want them to ask? It seems reasonable that if someone expects the review to take 2 days on average, there's still a 1/5 chance that it will take 1 week, and in that case the editor might like them to ask for the week directly.
– JiK
12 hours ago
@jakebeal I was also advised, and now practice, asking for approximately max(3days, X*30%) more extra time, rounded to the nearest week, if I estimated I needed X time to finish, to give myself a small buffer and avoid asking twice. So two days are likely to become a week, a week 10 days, and 3 months (very extensive revision, happened once) 4 months. I will, if I can, submit sooner, but I'll also be very happy if I realize I underestimated and can now actually still finish at a reasonable pace rather than forgoing sleep for the last 3 days before the submission.
– penelope
8 hours ago
@ZeroTheHero Actually, I'd still prefer to have somebody give me their honest estimate and then bug them again if they don't deliver. At least I know I've got their attention, rather than being shuffled into the "don't have to think about it this week" pile, which is likely to lead to asking for another week the next week.
– jakebeal
6 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
When I ask for an extension, I usually ask for a substantial one, i.e. one week not just 2 days. This way, if I need more than 2 days for some unforeseen reason I don’t have to ask for another extension. Moreover if the editor is really tight she/he can negotiate down to 2 days and everybody is happy.
Dear editor,
Due to unforeseen circumstances I can only guarantee submission of my report by[deadline+1 week]. I trust this firm new submission date is acceptable to the Journal.
When I ask for an extension, I usually ask for a substantial one, i.e. one week not just 2 days. This way, if I need more than 2 days for some unforeseen reason I don’t have to ask for another extension. Moreover if the editor is really tight she/he can negotiate down to 2 days and everybody is happy.
Dear editor,
Due to unforeseen circumstances I can only guarantee submission of my report by[deadline+1 week]. I trust this firm new submission date is acceptable to the Journal.
answered yesterday
ZeroTheHeroZeroTheHero
1,577113
1,577113
2
As an editor, I want people to ask for only what they need.
– jakebeal
yesterday
1
@jakebeal so do I but I would rather not deal with people asking for a 2-day extension every 2nd day: I'm more interested in a firm deadline than a moving one.
– ZeroTheHero
yesterday
@jakebeal People know only a subjective probability distribution of the time they need, not a specific value. Which quantile (or other statistic) do you want them to ask? It seems reasonable that if someone expects the review to take 2 days on average, there's still a 1/5 chance that it will take 1 week, and in that case the editor might like them to ask for the week directly.
– JiK
12 hours ago
@jakebeal I was also advised, and now practice, asking for approximately max(3days, X*30%) more extra time, rounded to the nearest week, if I estimated I needed X time to finish, to give myself a small buffer and avoid asking twice. So two days are likely to become a week, a week 10 days, and 3 months (very extensive revision, happened once) 4 months. I will, if I can, submit sooner, but I'll also be very happy if I realize I underestimated and can now actually still finish at a reasonable pace rather than forgoing sleep for the last 3 days before the submission.
– penelope
8 hours ago
@ZeroTheHero Actually, I'd still prefer to have somebody give me their honest estimate and then bug them again if they don't deliver. At least I know I've got their attention, rather than being shuffled into the "don't have to think about it this week" pile, which is likely to lead to asking for another week the next week.
– jakebeal
6 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
2
As an editor, I want people to ask for only what they need.
– jakebeal
yesterday
1
@jakebeal so do I but I would rather not deal with people asking for a 2-day extension every 2nd day: I'm more interested in a firm deadline than a moving one.
– ZeroTheHero
yesterday
@jakebeal People know only a subjective probability distribution of the time they need, not a specific value. Which quantile (or other statistic) do you want them to ask? It seems reasonable that if someone expects the review to take 2 days on average, there's still a 1/5 chance that it will take 1 week, and in that case the editor might like them to ask for the week directly.
– JiK
12 hours ago
@jakebeal I was also advised, and now practice, asking for approximately max(3days, X*30%) more extra time, rounded to the nearest week, if I estimated I needed X time to finish, to give myself a small buffer and avoid asking twice. So two days are likely to become a week, a week 10 days, and 3 months (very extensive revision, happened once) 4 months. I will, if I can, submit sooner, but I'll also be very happy if I realize I underestimated and can now actually still finish at a reasonable pace rather than forgoing sleep for the last 3 days before the submission.
– penelope
8 hours ago
@ZeroTheHero Actually, I'd still prefer to have somebody give me their honest estimate and then bug them again if they don't deliver. At least I know I've got their attention, rather than being shuffled into the "don't have to think about it this week" pile, which is likely to lead to asking for another week the next week.
– jakebeal
6 hours ago
2
2
As an editor, I want people to ask for only what they need.
– jakebeal
yesterday
As an editor, I want people to ask for only what they need.
– jakebeal
yesterday
1
1
@jakebeal so do I but I would rather not deal with people asking for a 2-day extension every 2nd day: I'm more interested in a firm deadline than a moving one.
– ZeroTheHero
yesterday
@jakebeal so do I but I would rather not deal with people asking for a 2-day extension every 2nd day: I'm more interested in a firm deadline than a moving one.
– ZeroTheHero
yesterday
@jakebeal People know only a subjective probability distribution of the time they need, not a specific value. Which quantile (or other statistic) do you want them to ask? It seems reasonable that if someone expects the review to take 2 days on average, there's still a 1/5 chance that it will take 1 week, and in that case the editor might like them to ask for the week directly.
– JiK
12 hours ago
@jakebeal People know only a subjective probability distribution of the time they need, not a specific value. Which quantile (or other statistic) do you want them to ask? It seems reasonable that if someone expects the review to take 2 days on average, there's still a 1/5 chance that it will take 1 week, and in that case the editor might like them to ask for the week directly.
– JiK
12 hours ago
@jakebeal I was also advised, and now practice, asking for approximately max(3days, X*30%) more extra time, rounded to the nearest week, if I estimated I needed X time to finish, to give myself a small buffer and avoid asking twice. So two days are likely to become a week, a week 10 days, and 3 months (very extensive revision, happened once) 4 months. I will, if I can, submit sooner, but I'll also be very happy if I realize I underestimated and can now actually still finish at a reasonable pace rather than forgoing sleep for the last 3 days before the submission.
– penelope
8 hours ago
@jakebeal I was also advised, and now practice, asking for approximately max(3days, X*30%) more extra time, rounded to the nearest week, if I estimated I needed X time to finish, to give myself a small buffer and avoid asking twice. So two days are likely to become a week, a week 10 days, and 3 months (very extensive revision, happened once) 4 months. I will, if I can, submit sooner, but I'll also be very happy if I realize I underestimated and can now actually still finish at a reasonable pace rather than forgoing sleep for the last 3 days before the submission.
– penelope
8 hours ago
@ZeroTheHero Actually, I'd still prefer to have somebody give me their honest estimate and then bug them again if they don't deliver. At least I know I've got their attention, rather than being shuffled into the "don't have to think about it this week" pile, which is likely to lead to asking for another week the next week.
– jakebeal
6 hours ago
@ZeroTheHero Actually, I'd still prefer to have somebody give me their honest estimate and then bug them again if they don't deliver. At least I know I've got their attention, rather than being shuffled into the "don't have to think about it this week" pile, which is likely to lead to asking for another week the next week.
– jakebeal
6 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f127299%2fis-it-convenient-to-ask-the-journals-editor-for-two-additional-days-to-complete%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown

16
A two day extension is almost nothing compared to the significant work of finding a new reviewer. I would just ask (in fact I've done so multiple times). They won't put you on a blacklist for such a reasonable request.
– Roland
2 days ago
1
Yes, you can I have asked an editor to extend the review and he did it, there is no worries.
– Monkia
yesterday
6
I never ask. I submit my reviews whenever I have time.
– Prof. Santa Claus
yesterday
2
@Prof.SantaClaus I may do that when I become a professor as big as Santa is! :D
– Babak
yesterday