Is it convenient to ask the journal's editor for two additional days to complete a review? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHow long is reasonable to wait for reply from an editor?How much time should one spend refereeing a paper?Should I choose the same editor for two papers?Slightly revised version of submitted paper two days afterwards: will the editor be annoyed?Referee report ignored and not sent to authorsFirstly manuscipt 'rejected' and then status changed to 'revise'Elsevier Editorial System: is this scam?Editor is asking for two referees and single columnResubmitting a Paper to a Mathematics Journal After Questionable RejectionHow is the Journal for an annual Review Chosen

Direct Implications Between USA and UK in Event of No-Deal Brexit

How exploitable/balanced is this homebrew spell: Spell Permanency?

Incomplete cube

What is Decreasing Arithmetic progression?

Could you use a laser beam as a modulated carrier wave for radio signal?

Another proof that dividing by 0 does not exist -- is it right?

It it possible to avoid kiwi.com's automatic online check-in and instead do it manually by yourself?

Is it possible to make a 9x9 table fit within the default margins?

How to pronounce fünf in 45

How can a day be of 24 hours?

Compensation for working overtime on Saturdays

Is it reasonable to ask other researchers to send me their previous grant applications?

Would a grinding machine be a simple and workable propulsion system for an interplanetary spacecraft?

Is there a rule of thumb for determining the amount one should accept for of a settlement offer?

Trying to insert a background image via TikZ results in extra white-space around the corners

How can I force the size of an int for debugging purposes?

How to implement Comparable so it is consistent with identity-equality

Ising model simulation

Can you teleport closer to a creature you are Frightened of?

How to show a landlord what we have in savings?

What does it mean 'exit 1' for a job status after rclone sync

How to avoid supervisors with prejudiced views?

Is the offspring between a demon and a celestial possible? If so what is it called and is it in a book somewhere?

How seriously should I take size and weight limits of hand luggage?



Is it convenient to ask the journal's editor for two additional days to complete a review?



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHow long is reasonable to wait for reply from an editor?How much time should one spend refereeing a paper?Should I choose the same editor for two papers?Slightly revised version of submitted paper two days afterwards: will the editor be annoyed?Referee report ignored and not sent to authorsFirstly manuscipt 'rejected' and then status changed to 'revise'Elsevier Editorial System: is this scam?Editor is asking for two referees and single columnResubmitting a Paper to a Mathematics Journal After Questionable RejectionHow is the Journal for an annual Review Chosen










17















I am assigned as a reviewer of an article for IEEE TNNLS (computer science), but unfortunately, I would be super busy during the week of the deadline. In fact, I need to submit a paper and also two postdoc applications during the same week.



I'm already trying to do as much as I can before that week, but it'd make things much easier (with better quality) if I can postpone the review at least for two more days. So, I like to know if it looks unprofessional to ask the editor for that extension and whether it'd damage my review performance/reputation in that journal?










share|improve this question



















  • 16





    A two day extension is almost nothing compared to the significant work of finding a new reviewer. I would just ask (in fact I've done so multiple times). They won't put you on a blacklist for such a reasonable request.

    – Roland
    2 days ago






  • 1





    Yes, you can I have asked an editor to extend the review and he did it, there is no worries.

    – Monkia
    yesterday






  • 6





    I never ask. I submit my reviews whenever I have time.

    – Prof. Santa Claus
    yesterday






  • 2





    @Prof.SantaClaus I may do that when I become a professor as big as Santa is! :D

    – Babak
    yesterday















17















I am assigned as a reviewer of an article for IEEE TNNLS (computer science), but unfortunately, I would be super busy during the week of the deadline. In fact, I need to submit a paper and also two postdoc applications during the same week.



I'm already trying to do as much as I can before that week, but it'd make things much easier (with better quality) if I can postpone the review at least for two more days. So, I like to know if it looks unprofessional to ask the editor for that extension and whether it'd damage my review performance/reputation in that journal?










share|improve this question



















  • 16





    A two day extension is almost nothing compared to the significant work of finding a new reviewer. I would just ask (in fact I've done so multiple times). They won't put you on a blacklist for such a reasonable request.

    – Roland
    2 days ago






  • 1





    Yes, you can I have asked an editor to extend the review and he did it, there is no worries.

    – Monkia
    yesterday






  • 6





    I never ask. I submit my reviews whenever I have time.

    – Prof. Santa Claus
    yesterday






  • 2





    @Prof.SantaClaus I may do that when I become a professor as big as Santa is! :D

    – Babak
    yesterday













17












17








17








I am assigned as a reviewer of an article for IEEE TNNLS (computer science), but unfortunately, I would be super busy during the week of the deadline. In fact, I need to submit a paper and also two postdoc applications during the same week.



I'm already trying to do as much as I can before that week, but it'd make things much easier (with better quality) if I can postpone the review at least for two more days. So, I like to know if it looks unprofessional to ask the editor for that extension and whether it'd damage my review performance/reputation in that journal?










share|improve this question
















I am assigned as a reviewer of an article for IEEE TNNLS (computer science), but unfortunately, I would be super busy during the week of the deadline. In fact, I need to submit a paper and also two postdoc applications during the same week.



I'm already trying to do as much as I can before that week, but it'd make things much easier (with better quality) if I can postpone the review at least for two more days. So, I like to know if it looks unprofessional to ask the editor for that extension and whether it'd damage my review performance/reputation in that journal?







journals peer-review review-articles






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday









Wrzlprmft

34.6k11109185




34.6k11109185










asked 2 days ago









BabakBabak

1,5271829




1,5271829







  • 16





    A two day extension is almost nothing compared to the significant work of finding a new reviewer. I would just ask (in fact I've done so multiple times). They won't put you on a blacklist for such a reasonable request.

    – Roland
    2 days ago






  • 1





    Yes, you can I have asked an editor to extend the review and he did it, there is no worries.

    – Monkia
    yesterday






  • 6





    I never ask. I submit my reviews whenever I have time.

    – Prof. Santa Claus
    yesterday






  • 2





    @Prof.SantaClaus I may do that when I become a professor as big as Santa is! :D

    – Babak
    yesterday












  • 16





    A two day extension is almost nothing compared to the significant work of finding a new reviewer. I would just ask (in fact I've done so multiple times). They won't put you on a blacklist for such a reasonable request.

    – Roland
    2 days ago






  • 1





    Yes, you can I have asked an editor to extend the review and he did it, there is no worries.

    – Monkia
    yesterday






  • 6





    I never ask. I submit my reviews whenever I have time.

    – Prof. Santa Claus
    yesterday






  • 2





    @Prof.SantaClaus I may do that when I become a professor as big as Santa is! :D

    – Babak
    yesterday







16




16





A two day extension is almost nothing compared to the significant work of finding a new reviewer. I would just ask (in fact I've done so multiple times). They won't put you on a blacklist for such a reasonable request.

– Roland
2 days ago





A two day extension is almost nothing compared to the significant work of finding a new reviewer. I would just ask (in fact I've done so multiple times). They won't put you on a blacklist for such a reasonable request.

– Roland
2 days ago




1




1





Yes, you can I have asked an editor to extend the review and he did it, there is no worries.

– Monkia
yesterday





Yes, you can I have asked an editor to extend the review and he did it, there is no worries.

– Monkia
yesterday




6




6





I never ask. I submit my reviews whenever I have time.

– Prof. Santa Claus
yesterday





I never ask. I submit my reviews whenever I have time.

– Prof. Santa Claus
yesterday




2




2





@Prof.SantaClaus I may do that when I become a professor as big as Santa is! :D

– Babak
yesterday





@Prof.SantaClaus I may do that when I become a professor as big as Santa is! :D

– Babak
yesterday










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















23














Getting a review in two days late for a journal article is pretty common. I wouldn't worry about anything less than being a week late. For conferences, deadlines can be tighter, but 2 days is nothing. Ideally you would let the editor know your review will be a couple of days late, but even if you didn't, it is not the end of the world.






share|improve this answer






























    9














    I wouldn't even ask. Just "tell".



    Send a short email saying you will send the review a week later (more time than needed, don't want to come back in 2 days again). Don't phrase the email in a manner that requires a response from the editor--tell, don't ask (cut the back and forth chatter).



    If the editor wants/needs to pull the paper, he will do so. But it's very unlikely he will. But just let him do what he does.



    In addition, I would be practical and do a simple review. I love doing extensive murder board reviews. But you need to concentrate on your own stuff. There is probably an 80-20 rule where you can give 80% of the key improvements with 20% of the text and parsing time. In particular, if you are recommending rejection, I would be economical with your time and not investment much in improvement recommendations.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.















    • 14





      "Ask" will be interpreted as "tell" and is far more polite.

      – Bob Brown
      yesterday











    • @BobBrown: I don't mind asking, but should I also apologize for the inconvenience? ;)

      – Babak
      yesterday






    • 1





      @Babak - You can add that sentence in the same formally-ask, but in-reality-tell email. But that's just a politeness gesture. In reality, there is nothing in here to feel apologetic for. :)

      – 299792458
      yesterday











    • @Babak If you like, but don't make a big deal of it. You are still "telling," after all. The point is to do so politely.

      – Bob Brown
      yesterday


















    3














    When I ask for an extension, I usually ask for a substantial one, i.e. one week not just 2 days. This way, if I need more than 2 days for some unforeseen reason I don’t have to ask for another extension. Moreover if the editor is really tight she/he can negotiate down to 2 days and everybody is happy.




    Dear editor,
    Due to unforeseen circumstances I can only guarantee submission of my report by[deadline+1 week]. I trust this firm new submission date is acceptable to the Journal.







    share|improve this answer


















    • 2





      As an editor, I want people to ask for only what they need.

      – jakebeal
      yesterday






    • 1





      @jakebeal so do I but I would rather not deal with people asking for a 2-day extension every 2nd day: I'm more interested in a firm deadline than a moving one.

      – ZeroTheHero
      yesterday












    • @jakebeal People know only a subjective probability distribution of the time they need, not a specific value. Which quantile (or other statistic) do you want them to ask? It seems reasonable that if someone expects the review to take 2 days on average, there's still a 1/5 chance that it will take 1 week, and in that case the editor might like them to ask for the week directly.

      – JiK
      12 hours ago











    • @jakebeal I was also advised, and now practice, asking for approximately max(3days, X*30%) more extra time, rounded to the nearest week, if I estimated I needed X time to finish, to give myself a small buffer and avoid asking twice. So two days are likely to become a week, a week 10 days, and 3 months (very extensive revision, happened once) 4 months. I will, if I can, submit sooner, but I'll also be very happy if I realize I underestimated and can now actually still finish at a reasonable pace rather than forgoing sleep for the last 3 days before the submission.

      – penelope
      8 hours ago











    • @ZeroTheHero Actually, I'd still prefer to have somebody give me their honest estimate and then bug them again if they don't deliver. At least I know I've got their attention, rather than being shuffled into the "don't have to think about it this week" pile, which is likely to lead to asking for another week the next week.

      – jakebeal
      6 hours ago











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "415"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f127299%2fis-it-convenient-to-ask-the-journals-editor-for-two-additional-days-to-complete%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    23














    Getting a review in two days late for a journal article is pretty common. I wouldn't worry about anything less than being a week late. For conferences, deadlines can be tighter, but 2 days is nothing. Ideally you would let the editor know your review will be a couple of days late, but even if you didn't, it is not the end of the world.






    share|improve this answer



























      23














      Getting a review in two days late for a journal article is pretty common. I wouldn't worry about anything less than being a week late. For conferences, deadlines can be tighter, but 2 days is nothing. Ideally you would let the editor know your review will be a couple of days late, but even if you didn't, it is not the end of the world.






      share|improve this answer

























        23












        23








        23







        Getting a review in two days late for a journal article is pretty common. I wouldn't worry about anything less than being a week late. For conferences, deadlines can be tighter, but 2 days is nothing. Ideally you would let the editor know your review will be a couple of days late, but even if you didn't, it is not the end of the world.






        share|improve this answer













        Getting a review in two days late for a journal article is pretty common. I wouldn't worry about anything less than being a week late. For conferences, deadlines can be tighter, but 2 days is nothing. Ideally you would let the editor know your review will be a couple of days late, but even if you didn't, it is not the end of the world.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered yesterday









        StrongBadStrongBad

        86.5k24216423




        86.5k24216423





















            9














            I wouldn't even ask. Just "tell".



            Send a short email saying you will send the review a week later (more time than needed, don't want to come back in 2 days again). Don't phrase the email in a manner that requires a response from the editor--tell, don't ask (cut the back and forth chatter).



            If the editor wants/needs to pull the paper, he will do so. But it's very unlikely he will. But just let him do what he does.



            In addition, I would be practical and do a simple review. I love doing extensive murder board reviews. But you need to concentrate on your own stuff. There is probably an 80-20 rule where you can give 80% of the key improvements with 20% of the text and parsing time. In particular, if you are recommending rejection, I would be economical with your time and not investment much in improvement recommendations.






            share|improve this answer








            New contributor




            guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.















            • 14





              "Ask" will be interpreted as "tell" and is far more polite.

              – Bob Brown
              yesterday











            • @BobBrown: I don't mind asking, but should I also apologize for the inconvenience? ;)

              – Babak
              yesterday






            • 1





              @Babak - You can add that sentence in the same formally-ask, but in-reality-tell email. But that's just a politeness gesture. In reality, there is nothing in here to feel apologetic for. :)

              – 299792458
              yesterday











            • @Babak If you like, but don't make a big deal of it. You are still "telling," after all. The point is to do so politely.

              – Bob Brown
              yesterday















            9














            I wouldn't even ask. Just "tell".



            Send a short email saying you will send the review a week later (more time than needed, don't want to come back in 2 days again). Don't phrase the email in a manner that requires a response from the editor--tell, don't ask (cut the back and forth chatter).



            If the editor wants/needs to pull the paper, he will do so. But it's very unlikely he will. But just let him do what he does.



            In addition, I would be practical and do a simple review. I love doing extensive murder board reviews. But you need to concentrate on your own stuff. There is probably an 80-20 rule where you can give 80% of the key improvements with 20% of the text and parsing time. In particular, if you are recommending rejection, I would be economical with your time and not investment much in improvement recommendations.






            share|improve this answer








            New contributor




            guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.















            • 14





              "Ask" will be interpreted as "tell" and is far more polite.

              – Bob Brown
              yesterday











            • @BobBrown: I don't mind asking, but should I also apologize for the inconvenience? ;)

              – Babak
              yesterday






            • 1





              @Babak - You can add that sentence in the same formally-ask, but in-reality-tell email. But that's just a politeness gesture. In reality, there is nothing in here to feel apologetic for. :)

              – 299792458
              yesterday











            • @Babak If you like, but don't make a big deal of it. You are still "telling," after all. The point is to do so politely.

              – Bob Brown
              yesterday













            9












            9








            9







            I wouldn't even ask. Just "tell".



            Send a short email saying you will send the review a week later (more time than needed, don't want to come back in 2 days again). Don't phrase the email in a manner that requires a response from the editor--tell, don't ask (cut the back and forth chatter).



            If the editor wants/needs to pull the paper, he will do so. But it's very unlikely he will. But just let him do what he does.



            In addition, I would be practical and do a simple review. I love doing extensive murder board reviews. But you need to concentrate on your own stuff. There is probably an 80-20 rule where you can give 80% of the key improvements with 20% of the text and parsing time. In particular, if you are recommending rejection, I would be economical with your time and not investment much in improvement recommendations.






            share|improve this answer








            New contributor




            guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.










            I wouldn't even ask. Just "tell".



            Send a short email saying you will send the review a week later (more time than needed, don't want to come back in 2 days again). Don't phrase the email in a manner that requires a response from the editor--tell, don't ask (cut the back and forth chatter).



            If the editor wants/needs to pull the paper, he will do so. But it's very unlikely he will. But just let him do what he does.



            In addition, I would be practical and do a simple review. I love doing extensive murder board reviews. But you need to concentrate on your own stuff. There is probably an 80-20 rule where you can give 80% of the key improvements with 20% of the text and parsing time. In particular, if you are recommending rejection, I would be economical with your time and not investment much in improvement recommendations.







            share|improve this answer








            New contributor




            guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer






            New contributor




            guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            answered yesterday









            guestguest

            1211




            1211




            New contributor




            guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.





            New contributor





            guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            guest is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.







            • 14





              "Ask" will be interpreted as "tell" and is far more polite.

              – Bob Brown
              yesterday











            • @BobBrown: I don't mind asking, but should I also apologize for the inconvenience? ;)

              – Babak
              yesterday






            • 1





              @Babak - You can add that sentence in the same formally-ask, but in-reality-tell email. But that's just a politeness gesture. In reality, there is nothing in here to feel apologetic for. :)

              – 299792458
              yesterday











            • @Babak If you like, but don't make a big deal of it. You are still "telling," after all. The point is to do so politely.

              – Bob Brown
              yesterday












            • 14





              "Ask" will be interpreted as "tell" and is far more polite.

              – Bob Brown
              yesterday











            • @BobBrown: I don't mind asking, but should I also apologize for the inconvenience? ;)

              – Babak
              yesterday






            • 1





              @Babak - You can add that sentence in the same formally-ask, but in-reality-tell email. But that's just a politeness gesture. In reality, there is nothing in here to feel apologetic for. :)

              – 299792458
              yesterday











            • @Babak If you like, but don't make a big deal of it. You are still "telling," after all. The point is to do so politely.

              – Bob Brown
              yesterday







            14




            14





            "Ask" will be interpreted as "tell" and is far more polite.

            – Bob Brown
            yesterday





            "Ask" will be interpreted as "tell" and is far more polite.

            – Bob Brown
            yesterday













            @BobBrown: I don't mind asking, but should I also apologize for the inconvenience? ;)

            – Babak
            yesterday





            @BobBrown: I don't mind asking, but should I also apologize for the inconvenience? ;)

            – Babak
            yesterday




            1




            1





            @Babak - You can add that sentence in the same formally-ask, but in-reality-tell email. But that's just a politeness gesture. In reality, there is nothing in here to feel apologetic for. :)

            – 299792458
            yesterday





            @Babak - You can add that sentence in the same formally-ask, but in-reality-tell email. But that's just a politeness gesture. In reality, there is nothing in here to feel apologetic for. :)

            – 299792458
            yesterday













            @Babak If you like, but don't make a big deal of it. You are still "telling," after all. The point is to do so politely.

            – Bob Brown
            yesterday





            @Babak If you like, but don't make a big deal of it. You are still "telling," after all. The point is to do so politely.

            – Bob Brown
            yesterday











            3














            When I ask for an extension, I usually ask for a substantial one, i.e. one week not just 2 days. This way, if I need more than 2 days for some unforeseen reason I don’t have to ask for another extension. Moreover if the editor is really tight she/he can negotiate down to 2 days and everybody is happy.




            Dear editor,
            Due to unforeseen circumstances I can only guarantee submission of my report by[deadline+1 week]. I trust this firm new submission date is acceptable to the Journal.







            share|improve this answer


















            • 2





              As an editor, I want people to ask for only what they need.

              – jakebeal
              yesterday






            • 1





              @jakebeal so do I but I would rather not deal with people asking for a 2-day extension every 2nd day: I'm more interested in a firm deadline than a moving one.

              – ZeroTheHero
              yesterday












            • @jakebeal People know only a subjective probability distribution of the time they need, not a specific value. Which quantile (or other statistic) do you want them to ask? It seems reasonable that if someone expects the review to take 2 days on average, there's still a 1/5 chance that it will take 1 week, and in that case the editor might like them to ask for the week directly.

              – JiK
              12 hours ago











            • @jakebeal I was also advised, and now practice, asking for approximately max(3days, X*30%) more extra time, rounded to the nearest week, if I estimated I needed X time to finish, to give myself a small buffer and avoid asking twice. So two days are likely to become a week, a week 10 days, and 3 months (very extensive revision, happened once) 4 months. I will, if I can, submit sooner, but I'll also be very happy if I realize I underestimated and can now actually still finish at a reasonable pace rather than forgoing sleep for the last 3 days before the submission.

              – penelope
              8 hours ago











            • @ZeroTheHero Actually, I'd still prefer to have somebody give me their honest estimate and then bug them again if they don't deliver. At least I know I've got their attention, rather than being shuffled into the "don't have to think about it this week" pile, which is likely to lead to asking for another week the next week.

              – jakebeal
              6 hours ago















            3














            When I ask for an extension, I usually ask for a substantial one, i.e. one week not just 2 days. This way, if I need more than 2 days for some unforeseen reason I don’t have to ask for another extension. Moreover if the editor is really tight she/he can negotiate down to 2 days and everybody is happy.




            Dear editor,
            Due to unforeseen circumstances I can only guarantee submission of my report by[deadline+1 week]. I trust this firm new submission date is acceptable to the Journal.







            share|improve this answer


















            • 2





              As an editor, I want people to ask for only what they need.

              – jakebeal
              yesterday






            • 1





              @jakebeal so do I but I would rather not deal with people asking for a 2-day extension every 2nd day: I'm more interested in a firm deadline than a moving one.

              – ZeroTheHero
              yesterday












            • @jakebeal People know only a subjective probability distribution of the time they need, not a specific value. Which quantile (or other statistic) do you want them to ask? It seems reasonable that if someone expects the review to take 2 days on average, there's still a 1/5 chance that it will take 1 week, and in that case the editor might like them to ask for the week directly.

              – JiK
              12 hours ago











            • @jakebeal I was also advised, and now practice, asking for approximately max(3days, X*30%) more extra time, rounded to the nearest week, if I estimated I needed X time to finish, to give myself a small buffer and avoid asking twice. So two days are likely to become a week, a week 10 days, and 3 months (very extensive revision, happened once) 4 months. I will, if I can, submit sooner, but I'll also be very happy if I realize I underestimated and can now actually still finish at a reasonable pace rather than forgoing sleep for the last 3 days before the submission.

              – penelope
              8 hours ago











            • @ZeroTheHero Actually, I'd still prefer to have somebody give me their honest estimate and then bug them again if they don't deliver. At least I know I've got their attention, rather than being shuffled into the "don't have to think about it this week" pile, which is likely to lead to asking for another week the next week.

              – jakebeal
              6 hours ago













            3












            3








            3







            When I ask for an extension, I usually ask for a substantial one, i.e. one week not just 2 days. This way, if I need more than 2 days for some unforeseen reason I don’t have to ask for another extension. Moreover if the editor is really tight she/he can negotiate down to 2 days and everybody is happy.




            Dear editor,
            Due to unforeseen circumstances I can only guarantee submission of my report by[deadline+1 week]. I trust this firm new submission date is acceptable to the Journal.







            share|improve this answer













            When I ask for an extension, I usually ask for a substantial one, i.e. one week not just 2 days. This way, if I need more than 2 days for some unforeseen reason I don’t have to ask for another extension. Moreover if the editor is really tight she/he can negotiate down to 2 days and everybody is happy.




            Dear editor,
            Due to unforeseen circumstances I can only guarantee submission of my report by[deadline+1 week]. I trust this firm new submission date is acceptable to the Journal.








            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered yesterday









            ZeroTheHeroZeroTheHero

            1,577113




            1,577113







            • 2





              As an editor, I want people to ask for only what they need.

              – jakebeal
              yesterday






            • 1





              @jakebeal so do I but I would rather not deal with people asking for a 2-day extension every 2nd day: I'm more interested in a firm deadline than a moving one.

              – ZeroTheHero
              yesterday












            • @jakebeal People know only a subjective probability distribution of the time they need, not a specific value. Which quantile (or other statistic) do you want them to ask? It seems reasonable that if someone expects the review to take 2 days on average, there's still a 1/5 chance that it will take 1 week, and in that case the editor might like them to ask for the week directly.

              – JiK
              12 hours ago











            • @jakebeal I was also advised, and now practice, asking for approximately max(3days, X*30%) more extra time, rounded to the nearest week, if I estimated I needed X time to finish, to give myself a small buffer and avoid asking twice. So two days are likely to become a week, a week 10 days, and 3 months (very extensive revision, happened once) 4 months. I will, if I can, submit sooner, but I'll also be very happy if I realize I underestimated and can now actually still finish at a reasonable pace rather than forgoing sleep for the last 3 days before the submission.

              – penelope
              8 hours ago











            • @ZeroTheHero Actually, I'd still prefer to have somebody give me their honest estimate and then bug them again if they don't deliver. At least I know I've got their attention, rather than being shuffled into the "don't have to think about it this week" pile, which is likely to lead to asking for another week the next week.

              – jakebeal
              6 hours ago












            • 2





              As an editor, I want people to ask for only what they need.

              – jakebeal
              yesterday






            • 1





              @jakebeal so do I but I would rather not deal with people asking for a 2-day extension every 2nd day: I'm more interested in a firm deadline than a moving one.

              – ZeroTheHero
              yesterday












            • @jakebeal People know only a subjective probability distribution of the time they need, not a specific value. Which quantile (or other statistic) do you want them to ask? It seems reasonable that if someone expects the review to take 2 days on average, there's still a 1/5 chance that it will take 1 week, and in that case the editor might like them to ask for the week directly.

              – JiK
              12 hours ago











            • @jakebeal I was also advised, and now practice, asking for approximately max(3days, X*30%) more extra time, rounded to the nearest week, if I estimated I needed X time to finish, to give myself a small buffer and avoid asking twice. So two days are likely to become a week, a week 10 days, and 3 months (very extensive revision, happened once) 4 months. I will, if I can, submit sooner, but I'll also be very happy if I realize I underestimated and can now actually still finish at a reasonable pace rather than forgoing sleep for the last 3 days before the submission.

              – penelope
              8 hours ago











            • @ZeroTheHero Actually, I'd still prefer to have somebody give me their honest estimate and then bug them again if they don't deliver. At least I know I've got their attention, rather than being shuffled into the "don't have to think about it this week" pile, which is likely to lead to asking for another week the next week.

              – jakebeal
              6 hours ago







            2




            2





            As an editor, I want people to ask for only what they need.

            – jakebeal
            yesterday





            As an editor, I want people to ask for only what they need.

            – jakebeal
            yesterday




            1




            1





            @jakebeal so do I but I would rather not deal with people asking for a 2-day extension every 2nd day: I'm more interested in a firm deadline than a moving one.

            – ZeroTheHero
            yesterday






            @jakebeal so do I but I would rather not deal with people asking for a 2-day extension every 2nd day: I'm more interested in a firm deadline than a moving one.

            – ZeroTheHero
            yesterday














            @jakebeal People know only a subjective probability distribution of the time they need, not a specific value. Which quantile (or other statistic) do you want them to ask? It seems reasonable that if someone expects the review to take 2 days on average, there's still a 1/5 chance that it will take 1 week, and in that case the editor might like them to ask for the week directly.

            – JiK
            12 hours ago





            @jakebeal People know only a subjective probability distribution of the time they need, not a specific value. Which quantile (or other statistic) do you want them to ask? It seems reasonable that if someone expects the review to take 2 days on average, there's still a 1/5 chance that it will take 1 week, and in that case the editor might like them to ask for the week directly.

            – JiK
            12 hours ago













            @jakebeal I was also advised, and now practice, asking for approximately max(3days, X*30%) more extra time, rounded to the nearest week, if I estimated I needed X time to finish, to give myself a small buffer and avoid asking twice. So two days are likely to become a week, a week 10 days, and 3 months (very extensive revision, happened once) 4 months. I will, if I can, submit sooner, but I'll also be very happy if I realize I underestimated and can now actually still finish at a reasonable pace rather than forgoing sleep for the last 3 days before the submission.

            – penelope
            8 hours ago





            @jakebeal I was also advised, and now practice, asking for approximately max(3days, X*30%) more extra time, rounded to the nearest week, if I estimated I needed X time to finish, to give myself a small buffer and avoid asking twice. So two days are likely to become a week, a week 10 days, and 3 months (very extensive revision, happened once) 4 months. I will, if I can, submit sooner, but I'll also be very happy if I realize I underestimated and can now actually still finish at a reasonable pace rather than forgoing sleep for the last 3 days before the submission.

            – penelope
            8 hours ago













            @ZeroTheHero Actually, I'd still prefer to have somebody give me their honest estimate and then bug them again if they don't deliver. At least I know I've got their attention, rather than being shuffled into the "don't have to think about it this week" pile, which is likely to lead to asking for another week the next week.

            – jakebeal
            6 hours ago





            @ZeroTheHero Actually, I'd still prefer to have somebody give me their honest estimate and then bug them again if they don't deliver. At least I know I've got their attention, rather than being shuffled into the "don't have to think about it this week" pile, which is likely to lead to asking for another week the next week.

            – jakebeal
            6 hours ago

















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f127299%2fis-it-convenient-to-ask-the-journals-editor-for-two-additional-days-to-complete%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            How to write a 12-bar blues melodyI-IV-V blues progressionHow to play the bridges in a standard blues progressionHow does Gdim7 fit in C# minor?question on a certain chord progressionMusicology of Melody12 bar blues, spread rhythm: alternative to 6th chord to avoid finger stretchChord progressions/ Root key/ MelodiesHow to put chords (POP-EDM) under a given lead vocal melody (starting from a good knowledge in music theory)Are there “rules” for improvising with the minor pentatonic scale over 12-bar shuffle?Confusion about blues scale and chords

            What if the end-user didn't have the required library?What is setup.py?What is a clean, pythonic way to have multiple constructors in Python?What does Ruby have that Python doesn't, and vice versa?What is the reason for having '//' in Python?How do I create a namespace package in Python?How to package shared objects that python modules depend on?setuptools vs. distutils: why is distutils still a thing?Navigation in Windows 10 vs code not going to virtualenv library when the same library is installed at user levelPython create package for local usePackaging a project that uses multiple python versionsWhy is permission denied on pip install except for when “--user” is included at end of command?

            Why did Thanos need his ship to help him in the battle scene?Which actor plays Thanos in the Avengers mid-credits scene?Are there economic implications portrayed in comics where the buildings and cities are ruined almost daily?Old X-Men comic where team travels to alien world with a ring-like sun that needs recharging?Why does Ego need help sleeping?Is there an objective answer to who “the strongest Avenger” is?How did Banner get unstuck?Why did Thanos get hit?How did Thanos (or anyone) know the Infinity Stones would give him this power?Did Thanos leave Eitri alive for his after-sales service?In Avengers 1, why does Thanos need Loki?