Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

How do you build a story from a world?

Why is c4 bad when playing the London against a King's Indian?

Working in the USA for living expenses only; allowed on VWP?

Do I include animal companions when calculating difficulty of an encounter?

1980s (or earlier) book where people live a long time but they have short memories

Company is asking me to work from overseas, but wants me to take a paycut

You've spoiled/damaged the card

What are they doing to this poor rocket?

What is the advantage of carrying a tripod and ND-filters when you could use image stacking instead?

How to make thick Asian sauces?

When writing an error prompt, should we end the sentence with a exclamation mark or a dot?

Is it OK to bring delicacies from hometown as tokens of gratitude for an out-of-town interview?

Do manufacturers try make their components as close to ideal ones as possible?

Could the Missouri River be running while Lake Michigan was frozen several meters deep?

What is a simple, physical situation where complex numbers emerge naturally?

Java 8: How to convert String to Map<String,List<String>>?

California: "For quality assurance, this phone call is being recorded"

Is the decompression of compressed and encrypted data without decryption also theoretically impossible?

Did thousands of women die every year due to illegal abortions before Roe v. Wade?

What do we gain with higher order logics?

What's the correct term for a waitress in the Middle Ages?

Short story written from alien perspective with this line: "It's too bright to look at, so they don't"

Will TSA allow me to carry a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) device?

What is the right way to float a home lab?



Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bit


How are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








4












$begingroup$


Suppose I have integers and encode them as binary strings for example: $$|0rangle=|00rangle,|1rangle= |01rangle,|2rangle=|10rangle,|3rangle=|11rangle.$$



Now an $n$ bit integer, say $x$, is encoded as a state $|x_0x_1....x_n-1rangle$ with $x_0$ being the most significant bit. To check the remainder by $4$ we only care about the two least significant bit i.e. $x_n-2x_n-1$. If the remainder is $0$ or $2$ then the least significant bit is $0$, and hence for a controlled operation that executes whether the remainder is $2$ or $0$ can be triggered only by the least significant bit being $0$. But my question is if I want to execute a controlled operation conditioned on the remainder being $3$ or $1$ what should be done? Since $|3rangle=|11rangle$ and $|0rangle=|00rangle $, should this be the circuit for the control?



enter image description here










share|improve this question











$endgroup$


















    4












    $begingroup$


    Suppose I have integers and encode them as binary strings for example: $$|0rangle=|00rangle,|1rangle= |01rangle,|2rangle=|10rangle,|3rangle=|11rangle.$$



    Now an $n$ bit integer, say $x$, is encoded as a state $|x_0x_1....x_n-1rangle$ with $x_0$ being the most significant bit. To check the remainder by $4$ we only care about the two least significant bit i.e. $x_n-2x_n-1$. If the remainder is $0$ or $2$ then the least significant bit is $0$, and hence for a controlled operation that executes whether the remainder is $2$ or $0$ can be triggered only by the least significant bit being $0$. But my question is if I want to execute a controlled operation conditioned on the remainder being $3$ or $1$ what should be done? Since $|3rangle=|11rangle$ and $|0rangle=|00rangle $, should this be the circuit for the control?



    enter image description here










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      4












      4








      4





      $begingroup$


      Suppose I have integers and encode them as binary strings for example: $$|0rangle=|00rangle,|1rangle= |01rangle,|2rangle=|10rangle,|3rangle=|11rangle.$$



      Now an $n$ bit integer, say $x$, is encoded as a state $|x_0x_1....x_n-1rangle$ with $x_0$ being the most significant bit. To check the remainder by $4$ we only care about the two least significant bit i.e. $x_n-2x_n-1$. If the remainder is $0$ or $2$ then the least significant bit is $0$, and hence for a controlled operation that executes whether the remainder is $2$ or $0$ can be triggered only by the least significant bit being $0$. But my question is if I want to execute a controlled operation conditioned on the remainder being $3$ or $1$ what should be done? Since $|3rangle=|11rangle$ and $|0rangle=|00rangle $, should this be the circuit for the control?



      enter image description here










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Suppose I have integers and encode them as binary strings for example: $$|0rangle=|00rangle,|1rangle= |01rangle,|2rangle=|10rangle,|3rangle=|11rangle.$$



      Now an $n$ bit integer, say $x$, is encoded as a state $|x_0x_1....x_n-1rangle$ with $x_0$ being the most significant bit. To check the remainder by $4$ we only care about the two least significant bit i.e. $x_n-2x_n-1$. If the remainder is $0$ or $2$ then the least significant bit is $0$, and hence for a controlled operation that executes whether the remainder is $2$ or $0$ can be triggered only by the least significant bit being $0$. But my question is if I want to execute a controlled operation conditioned on the remainder being $3$ or $1$ what should be done? Since $|3rangle=|11rangle$ and $|0rangle=|00rangle $, should this be the circuit for the control?



      enter image description here







      algorithm circuit-construction






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited May 18 at 23:29









      Sanchayan Dutta

      7,44841660




      7,44841660










      asked May 18 at 18:22









      UpstartUpstart

      34019




      34019




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5












          $begingroup$

          I would use a circuit that looks like:



          enter image description here



          Where $|0rangle$ is an ancillary output bit. Assume the initial state of the system is in the standard basis.



          Here, the first $land_2(X)$ (CCNOT) applies the $X$ gate to the target qubit for all states that have their two least significant bits set to 1. Note that if none of the states have $|x_n-1rangle=|1rangle$ and $|x_n-2rangle=|1rangle$ then the $X$ gate is never applied to the ancilla.



          We then negate both of the control bits, so that if they were previously 1 they are then set to 0, and vice versa. This results in the next $land_2(X)$ gate only being applied if originally, $|x_n-1rangle=|0rangle$ and $|x_n-2rangle=|0rangle$. The final two $X$ gates uncompute the original negation, so that the original states of the two least significant bits are preserved.



          Therefore, the only states that will have the ancillary bit set to $|1rangle$, are those for which the two least significant bits were either $|00rangle$ or $|11rangle$. Satisfying the requirements of your question.



          Please let me know if I can clarify further.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "694"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquantumcomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f6188%2fcircuit-construction-for-execution-of-conditional-statements-using-least-signifi%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            5












            $begingroup$

            I would use a circuit that looks like:



            enter image description here



            Where $|0rangle$ is an ancillary output bit. Assume the initial state of the system is in the standard basis.



            Here, the first $land_2(X)$ (CCNOT) applies the $X$ gate to the target qubit for all states that have their two least significant bits set to 1. Note that if none of the states have $|x_n-1rangle=|1rangle$ and $|x_n-2rangle=|1rangle$ then the $X$ gate is never applied to the ancilla.



            We then negate both of the control bits, so that if they were previously 1 they are then set to 0, and vice versa. This results in the next $land_2(X)$ gate only being applied if originally, $|x_n-1rangle=|0rangle$ and $|x_n-2rangle=|0rangle$. The final two $X$ gates uncompute the original negation, so that the original states of the two least significant bits are preserved.



            Therefore, the only states that will have the ancillary bit set to $|1rangle$, are those for which the two least significant bits were either $|00rangle$ or $|11rangle$. Satisfying the requirements of your question.



            Please let me know if I can clarify further.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$

















              5












              $begingroup$

              I would use a circuit that looks like:



              enter image description here



              Where $|0rangle$ is an ancillary output bit. Assume the initial state of the system is in the standard basis.



              Here, the first $land_2(X)$ (CCNOT) applies the $X$ gate to the target qubit for all states that have their two least significant bits set to 1. Note that if none of the states have $|x_n-1rangle=|1rangle$ and $|x_n-2rangle=|1rangle$ then the $X$ gate is never applied to the ancilla.



              We then negate both of the control bits, so that if they were previously 1 they are then set to 0, and vice versa. This results in the next $land_2(X)$ gate only being applied if originally, $|x_n-1rangle=|0rangle$ and $|x_n-2rangle=|0rangle$. The final two $X$ gates uncompute the original negation, so that the original states of the two least significant bits are preserved.



              Therefore, the only states that will have the ancillary bit set to $|1rangle$, are those for which the two least significant bits were either $|00rangle$ or $|11rangle$. Satisfying the requirements of your question.



              Please let me know if I can clarify further.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$















                5












                5








                5





                $begingroup$

                I would use a circuit that looks like:



                enter image description here



                Where $|0rangle$ is an ancillary output bit. Assume the initial state of the system is in the standard basis.



                Here, the first $land_2(X)$ (CCNOT) applies the $X$ gate to the target qubit for all states that have their two least significant bits set to 1. Note that if none of the states have $|x_n-1rangle=|1rangle$ and $|x_n-2rangle=|1rangle$ then the $X$ gate is never applied to the ancilla.



                We then negate both of the control bits, so that if they were previously 1 they are then set to 0, and vice versa. This results in the next $land_2(X)$ gate only being applied if originally, $|x_n-1rangle=|0rangle$ and $|x_n-2rangle=|0rangle$. The final two $X$ gates uncompute the original negation, so that the original states of the two least significant bits are preserved.



                Therefore, the only states that will have the ancillary bit set to $|1rangle$, are those for which the two least significant bits were either $|00rangle$ or $|11rangle$. Satisfying the requirements of your question.



                Please let me know if I can clarify further.






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                I would use a circuit that looks like:



                enter image description here



                Where $|0rangle$ is an ancillary output bit. Assume the initial state of the system is in the standard basis.



                Here, the first $land_2(X)$ (CCNOT) applies the $X$ gate to the target qubit for all states that have their two least significant bits set to 1. Note that if none of the states have $|x_n-1rangle=|1rangle$ and $|x_n-2rangle=|1rangle$ then the $X$ gate is never applied to the ancilla.



                We then negate both of the control bits, so that if they were previously 1 they are then set to 0, and vice versa. This results in the next $land_2(X)$ gate only being applied if originally, $|x_n-1rangle=|0rangle$ and $|x_n-2rangle=|0rangle$. The final two $X$ gates uncompute the original negation, so that the original states of the two least significant bits are preserved.



                Therefore, the only states that will have the ancillary bit set to $|1rangle$, are those for which the two least significant bits were either $|00rangle$ or $|11rangle$. Satisfying the requirements of your question.



                Please let me know if I can clarify further.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited May 18 at 23:21

























                answered May 18 at 23:11









                Arthur-1Arthur-1

                1266




                1266



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Quantum Computing Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquantumcomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f6188%2fcircuit-construction-for-execution-of-conditional-statements-using-least-signifi%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Club Baloncesto Breogán Índice Historia | Pavillón | Nome | O Breogán na cultura popular | Xogadores | Adestradores | Presidentes | Palmarés | Historial | Líderes | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióncbbreogan.galCadroGuía oficial da ACB 2009-10, páxina 201Guía oficial ACB 1992, páxina 183. Editorial DB.É de 6.500 espectadores sentados axeitándose á última normativa"Estudiantes Junior, entre as mellores canteiras"o orixinalHemeroteca El Mundo Deportivo, 16 setembro de 1970, páxina 12Historia do BreogánAlfredo Pérez, o último canoneiroHistoria C.B. BreogánHemeroteca de El Mundo DeportivoJimmy Wright, norteamericano do Breogán deixará Lugo por ameazas de morteResultados de Breogán en 1986-87Resultados de Breogán en 1990-91Ficha de Velimir Perasović en acb.comResultados de Breogán en 1994-95Breogán arrasa al Barça. "El Mundo Deportivo", 27 de setembro de 1999, páxina 58CB Breogán - FC BarcelonaA FEB invita a participar nunha nova Liga EuropeaCharlie Bell na prensa estatalMáximos anotadores 2005Tempada 2005-06 : Tódolos Xogadores da Xornada""Non quero pensar nunha man negra, mais pregúntome que está a pasar""o orixinalRaúl López, orgulloso dos xogadores, presume da boa saúde económica do BreogánJulio González confirma que cesa como presidente del BreogánHomenaxe a Lisardo GómezA tempada do rexurdimento celesteEntrevista a Lisardo GómezEl COB dinamita el Pazo para forzar el quinto (69-73)Cafés Candelas, patrocinador del CB Breogán"Suso Lázare, novo presidente do Breogán"o orixinalCafés Candelas Breogán firma el mayor triunfo de la historiaEl Breogán realizará 17 homenajes por su cincuenta aniversario"O Breogán honra ao seu fundador e primeiro presidente"o orixinalMiguel Giao recibiu a homenaxe do PazoHomenaxe aos primeiros gladiadores celestesO home que nos amosa como ver o Breo co corazónTita Franco será homenaxeada polos #50anosdeBreoJulio Vila recibirá unha homenaxe in memoriam polos #50anosdeBreo"O Breogán homenaxeará aos seus aboados máis veteráns"Pechada ovación a «Capi» Sanmartín e Ricardo «Corazón de González»Homenaxe por décadas de informaciónPaco García volve ao Pazo con motivo do 50 aniversario"Resultados y clasificaciones""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, campión da Copa Princesa""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, equipo ACB"C.B. Breogán"Proxecto social"o orixinal"Centros asociados"o orixinalFicha en imdb.comMario Camus trata la recuperación del amor en 'La vieja música', su última película"Páxina web oficial""Club Baloncesto Breogán""C. B. Breogán S.A.D."eehttp://www.fegaba.com

                    Vilaño, A Laracha Índice Patrimonio | Lugares e parroquias | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación43°14′52″N 8°36′03″O / 43.24775, -8.60070

                    Cegueira Índice Epidemioloxía | Deficiencia visual | Tipos de cegueira | Principais causas de cegueira | Tratamento | Técnicas de adaptación e axudas | Vida dos cegos | Primeiros auxilios | Crenzas respecto das persoas cegas | Crenzas das persoas cegas | O neno deficiente visual | Aspectos psicolóxicos da cegueira | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación54.054.154.436928256blindnessDicionario da Real Academia GalegaPortal das Palabras"International Standards: Visual Standards — Aspects and Ranges of Vision Loss with Emphasis on Population Surveys.""Visual impairment and blindness""Presentan un plan para previr a cegueira"o orixinalACCDV Associació Catalana de Cecs i Disminuïts Visuals - PMFTrachoma"Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis"1844137110.1056/NEJMoa0802268Cans guía - os mellores amigos dos cegosArquivadoEscola de cans guía para cegos en Mortágua, PortugalArquivado"Tecnología para ciegos y deficientes visuales. Recopilación de recursos gratuitos en la Red""Colorino""‘COL.diesis’, escuchar los sonidos del color""COL.diesis: Transforming Colour into Melody and Implementing the Result in a Colour Sensor Device"o orixinal"Sistema de desarrollo de sinestesia color-sonido para invidentes utilizando un protocolo de audio""Enseñanza táctil - geometría y color. Juegos didácticos para niños ciegos y videntes""Sistema Constanz"L'ocupació laboral dels cecs a l'Estat espanyol està pràcticament equiparada a la de les persones amb visió, entrevista amb Pedro ZuritaONCE (Organización Nacional de Cegos de España)Prevención da cegueiraDescrición de deficiencias visuais (Disc@pnet)Braillín, un boneco atractivo para calquera neno, con ou sen discapacidade, que permite familiarizarse co sistema de escritura e lectura brailleAxudas Técnicas36838ID00897494007150-90057129528256DOID:1432HP:0000618D001766C10.597.751.941.162C97109C0155020