Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bitHow are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation

How do you build a story from a world?

Why is c4 bad when playing the London against a King's Indian?

Working in the USA for living expenses only; allowed on VWP?

Do I include animal companions when calculating difficulty of an encounter?

1980s (or earlier) book where people live a long time but they have short memories

Company is asking me to work from overseas, but wants me to take a paycut

You've spoiled/damaged the card

What are they doing to this poor rocket?

What is the advantage of carrying a tripod and ND-filters when you could use image stacking instead?

How to make thick Asian sauces?

When writing an error prompt, should we end the sentence with a exclamation mark or a dot?

Is it OK to bring delicacies from hometown as tokens of gratitude for an out-of-town interview?

Do manufacturers try make their components as close to ideal ones as possible?

Could the Missouri River be running while Lake Michigan was frozen several meters deep?

What is a simple, physical situation where complex numbers emerge naturally?

Java 8: How to convert String to Map<String,List<String>>?

California: "For quality assurance, this phone call is being recorded"

Is the decompression of compressed and encrypted data without decryption also theoretically impossible?

Did thousands of women die every year due to illegal abortions before Roe v. Wade?

What do we gain with higher order logics?

What's the correct term for a waitress in the Middle Ages?

Short story written from alien perspective with this line: "It's too bright to look at, so they don't"

Will TSA allow me to carry a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) device?

What is the right way to float a home lab?



Circuit construction for execution of conditional statements using least significant bit


How are two different registers being used as “control”?How exactly is the stated composite state of the two registers being produced using the $R_zz$ controlled rotations?Efficiently performing controlled rotations in HHLWould this quantum algorithm implementation work?How to prepare a superposed states of odd integers from $1$ to $sqrtN$?Why is this implementation of the order finding algorithm not working?Circuit construction for Hamiltonian simulationHow can I invert the least significant bit of a certain term of a superposed state?Implementing an oracleImplementing a controlled sum operation






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








4












$begingroup$


Suppose I have integers and encode them as binary strings for example: $$|0rangle=|00rangle,|1rangle= |01rangle,|2rangle=|10rangle,|3rangle=|11rangle.$$



Now an $n$ bit integer, say $x$, is encoded as a state $|x_0x_1....x_n-1rangle$ with $x_0$ being the most significant bit. To check the remainder by $4$ we only care about the two least significant bit i.e. $x_n-2x_n-1$. If the remainder is $0$ or $2$ then the least significant bit is $0$, and hence for a controlled operation that executes whether the remainder is $2$ or $0$ can be triggered only by the least significant bit being $0$. But my question is if I want to execute a controlled operation conditioned on the remainder being $3$ or $1$ what should be done? Since $|3rangle=|11rangle$ and $|0rangle=|00rangle $, should this be the circuit for the control?



enter image description here










share|improve this question











$endgroup$


















    4












    $begingroup$


    Suppose I have integers and encode them as binary strings for example: $$|0rangle=|00rangle,|1rangle= |01rangle,|2rangle=|10rangle,|3rangle=|11rangle.$$



    Now an $n$ bit integer, say $x$, is encoded as a state $|x_0x_1....x_n-1rangle$ with $x_0$ being the most significant bit. To check the remainder by $4$ we only care about the two least significant bit i.e. $x_n-2x_n-1$. If the remainder is $0$ or $2$ then the least significant bit is $0$, and hence for a controlled operation that executes whether the remainder is $2$ or $0$ can be triggered only by the least significant bit being $0$. But my question is if I want to execute a controlled operation conditioned on the remainder being $3$ or $1$ what should be done? Since $|3rangle=|11rangle$ and $|0rangle=|00rangle $, should this be the circuit for the control?



    enter image description here










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      4












      4








      4





      $begingroup$


      Suppose I have integers and encode them as binary strings for example: $$|0rangle=|00rangle,|1rangle= |01rangle,|2rangle=|10rangle,|3rangle=|11rangle.$$



      Now an $n$ bit integer, say $x$, is encoded as a state $|x_0x_1....x_n-1rangle$ with $x_0$ being the most significant bit. To check the remainder by $4$ we only care about the two least significant bit i.e. $x_n-2x_n-1$. If the remainder is $0$ or $2$ then the least significant bit is $0$, and hence for a controlled operation that executes whether the remainder is $2$ or $0$ can be triggered only by the least significant bit being $0$. But my question is if I want to execute a controlled operation conditioned on the remainder being $3$ or $1$ what should be done? Since $|3rangle=|11rangle$ and $|0rangle=|00rangle $, should this be the circuit for the control?



      enter image description here










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Suppose I have integers and encode them as binary strings for example: $$|0rangle=|00rangle,|1rangle= |01rangle,|2rangle=|10rangle,|3rangle=|11rangle.$$



      Now an $n$ bit integer, say $x$, is encoded as a state $|x_0x_1....x_n-1rangle$ with $x_0$ being the most significant bit. To check the remainder by $4$ we only care about the two least significant bit i.e. $x_n-2x_n-1$. If the remainder is $0$ or $2$ then the least significant bit is $0$, and hence for a controlled operation that executes whether the remainder is $2$ or $0$ can be triggered only by the least significant bit being $0$. But my question is if I want to execute a controlled operation conditioned on the remainder being $3$ or $1$ what should be done? Since $|3rangle=|11rangle$ and $|0rangle=|00rangle $, should this be the circuit for the control?



      enter image description here







      algorithm circuit-construction






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited May 18 at 23:29









      Sanchayan Dutta

      7,44841660




      7,44841660










      asked May 18 at 18:22









      UpstartUpstart

      34019




      34019




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5












          $begingroup$

          I would use a circuit that looks like:



          enter image description here



          Where $|0rangle$ is an ancillary output bit. Assume the initial state of the system is in the standard basis.



          Here, the first $land_2(X)$ (CCNOT) applies the $X$ gate to the target qubit for all states that have their two least significant bits set to 1. Note that if none of the states have $|x_n-1rangle=|1rangle$ and $|x_n-2rangle=|1rangle$ then the $X$ gate is never applied to the ancilla.



          We then negate both of the control bits, so that if they were previously 1 they are then set to 0, and vice versa. This results in the next $land_2(X)$ gate only being applied if originally, $|x_n-1rangle=|0rangle$ and $|x_n-2rangle=|0rangle$. The final two $X$ gates uncompute the original negation, so that the original states of the two least significant bits are preserved.



          Therefore, the only states that will have the ancillary bit set to $|1rangle$, are those for which the two least significant bits were either $|00rangle$ or $|11rangle$. Satisfying the requirements of your question.



          Please let me know if I can clarify further.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "694"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquantumcomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f6188%2fcircuit-construction-for-execution-of-conditional-statements-using-least-signifi%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            5












            $begingroup$

            I would use a circuit that looks like:



            enter image description here



            Where $|0rangle$ is an ancillary output bit. Assume the initial state of the system is in the standard basis.



            Here, the first $land_2(X)$ (CCNOT) applies the $X$ gate to the target qubit for all states that have their two least significant bits set to 1. Note that if none of the states have $|x_n-1rangle=|1rangle$ and $|x_n-2rangle=|1rangle$ then the $X$ gate is never applied to the ancilla.



            We then negate both of the control bits, so that if they were previously 1 they are then set to 0, and vice versa. This results in the next $land_2(X)$ gate only being applied if originally, $|x_n-1rangle=|0rangle$ and $|x_n-2rangle=|0rangle$. The final two $X$ gates uncompute the original negation, so that the original states of the two least significant bits are preserved.



            Therefore, the only states that will have the ancillary bit set to $|1rangle$, are those for which the two least significant bits were either $|00rangle$ or $|11rangle$. Satisfying the requirements of your question.



            Please let me know if I can clarify further.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$

















              5












              $begingroup$

              I would use a circuit that looks like:



              enter image description here



              Where $|0rangle$ is an ancillary output bit. Assume the initial state of the system is in the standard basis.



              Here, the first $land_2(X)$ (CCNOT) applies the $X$ gate to the target qubit for all states that have their two least significant bits set to 1. Note that if none of the states have $|x_n-1rangle=|1rangle$ and $|x_n-2rangle=|1rangle$ then the $X$ gate is never applied to the ancilla.



              We then negate both of the control bits, so that if they were previously 1 they are then set to 0, and vice versa. This results in the next $land_2(X)$ gate only being applied if originally, $|x_n-1rangle=|0rangle$ and $|x_n-2rangle=|0rangle$. The final two $X$ gates uncompute the original negation, so that the original states of the two least significant bits are preserved.



              Therefore, the only states that will have the ancillary bit set to $|1rangle$, are those for which the two least significant bits were either $|00rangle$ or $|11rangle$. Satisfying the requirements of your question.



              Please let me know if I can clarify further.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$















                5












                5








                5





                $begingroup$

                I would use a circuit that looks like:



                enter image description here



                Where $|0rangle$ is an ancillary output bit. Assume the initial state of the system is in the standard basis.



                Here, the first $land_2(X)$ (CCNOT) applies the $X$ gate to the target qubit for all states that have their two least significant bits set to 1. Note that if none of the states have $|x_n-1rangle=|1rangle$ and $|x_n-2rangle=|1rangle$ then the $X$ gate is never applied to the ancilla.



                We then negate both of the control bits, so that if they were previously 1 they are then set to 0, and vice versa. This results in the next $land_2(X)$ gate only being applied if originally, $|x_n-1rangle=|0rangle$ and $|x_n-2rangle=|0rangle$. The final two $X$ gates uncompute the original negation, so that the original states of the two least significant bits are preserved.



                Therefore, the only states that will have the ancillary bit set to $|1rangle$, are those for which the two least significant bits were either $|00rangle$ or $|11rangle$. Satisfying the requirements of your question.



                Please let me know if I can clarify further.






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                I would use a circuit that looks like:



                enter image description here



                Where $|0rangle$ is an ancillary output bit. Assume the initial state of the system is in the standard basis.



                Here, the first $land_2(X)$ (CCNOT) applies the $X$ gate to the target qubit for all states that have their two least significant bits set to 1. Note that if none of the states have $|x_n-1rangle=|1rangle$ and $|x_n-2rangle=|1rangle$ then the $X$ gate is never applied to the ancilla.



                We then negate both of the control bits, so that if they were previously 1 they are then set to 0, and vice versa. This results in the next $land_2(X)$ gate only being applied if originally, $|x_n-1rangle=|0rangle$ and $|x_n-2rangle=|0rangle$. The final two $X$ gates uncompute the original negation, so that the original states of the two least significant bits are preserved.



                Therefore, the only states that will have the ancillary bit set to $|1rangle$, are those for which the two least significant bits were either $|00rangle$ or $|11rangle$. Satisfying the requirements of your question.



                Please let me know if I can clarify further.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited May 18 at 23:21

























                answered May 18 at 23:11









                Arthur-1Arthur-1

                1266




                1266



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Quantum Computing Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquantumcomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f6188%2fcircuit-construction-for-execution-of-conditional-statements-using-least-signifi%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Wikipedia:Vital articles Мазмуну Biography - Өмүр баян Philosophy and psychology - Философия жана психология Religion - Дин Social sciences - Коомдук илимдер Language and literature - Тил жана адабият Science - Илим Technology - Технология Arts and recreation - Искусство жана эс алуу History and geography - Тарых жана география Навигация менюсу

                    Bruxelas-Capital Índice Historia | Composición | Situación lingüística | Clima | Cidades irmandadas | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióneO uso das linguas en Bruxelas e a situación do neerlandés"Rexión de Bruxelas Capital"o orixinalSitio da rexiónPáxina de Bruselas no sitio da Oficina de Promoción Turística de Valonia e BruxelasMapa Interactivo da Rexión de Bruxelas-CapitaleeWorldCat332144929079854441105155190212ID28008674080552-90000 0001 0666 3698n94104302ID540940339365017018237

                    What should I write in an apology letter, since I have decided not to join a company after accepting an offer letterShould I keep looking after accepting a job offer?What should I do when I've been verbally told I would get an offer letter, but still haven't gotten one after 4 weeks?Do I accept an offer from a company that I am not likely to join?New job hasn't confirmed starting date and I want to give current employer as much notice as possibleHow should I address my manager in my resignation letter?HR delayed background verification, now jobless as resignedNo email communication after accepting a formal written offer. How should I phrase the call?What should I do if after receiving a verbal offer letter I am informed that my written job offer is put on hold due to some internal issues?Should I inform the current employer that I am about to resign within 1-2 weeks since I have signed the offer letter and waiting for visa?What company will do, if I send their offer letter to another company