Removing Doubles Destroy TopologyTopology modelingTips for proper topologyProblem with bad topologyTopology question regarding vehicleTopology: Sphere to planeWhat is the function of “removing doubles UV”Remove doubles isn't removing overlapping verticesTopology improvements?'Remove Doubles' is removing vertices that don't overlap. Whats wrong?Removing Doubles Ruins Mesh of My Character
How certain is a caster of when their spell will end?
How to decline physical affection from a child whose parents are pressuring them?
Could the Missouri River be running while Lake Michigan was frozen several meters deep?
Initialize an std::array algorithmically at compile time
Is it legal in the UK for politicians to lie to the public for political gain?
Is there any word or phrase for negative bearing?
Why is the relationship between frequency and pitch exponential?
Linux tr to convert vertical text to horizontal
Traffic law UK, pedestrians
Incremental Ranges!
Working in the USA for living expenses only; allowed on VWP?
Can a magnetic field of an object be stronger than its gravity?
Count down from 0 to 5 seconds and repeat
Company is asking me to work from overseas, but wants me to take a paycut
What is the right way to float a home lab?
How to make a setting relevant?
Is it possible for people to live in the eye of a permanent hypercane?
How to skip replacing first occurrence of a character in each line?
What are the words for people who cause trouble believing they know better?
What is the advantage of carrying a tripod and ND-filters when you could use image stacking instead?
Avoiding cliches when writing gods
How were concentration and extermination camp guards recruited?
Does Peach's float negate shorthop knockback multipliers?
Chopin: marche funèbre bar 15 impossible place
Removing Doubles Destroy Topology
Topology modelingTips for proper topologyProblem with bad topologyTopology question regarding vehicleTopology: Sphere to planeWhat is the function of “removing doubles UV”Remove doubles isn't removing overlapping verticesTopology improvements?'Remove Doubles' is removing vertices that don't overlap. Whats wrong?Removing Doubles Ruins Mesh of My Character
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
Problem:
When two vertices are being too close to each others, during the operation of "Remove Doubles", they merged together as it considered as a single vertex. It happens during my organic modelling, picture below shows before and after removing the doubles from my part of my mesh. Preserving quads topology is the primary, is there a solution to this problem?
Constraint:
This part of the mesh is limited to this size proportion. In other words, it's not rational to just scale up these faces to avoid the problem.
Assumption:
I assumed ensuring no doubles exists is important for avoiding the problem of "Bone Heat Weighting:Failed to find solution for one or more bones." during parenting mesh to rigs with automatic weights.
Solution tried:
Scaling up the mesh by factor of 10 or 20, but it doesn't help in blender to not consider the vertices as doubles.
modeling topology
asked May 18 at 23:14
AceryLAceryL
355
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Problem:
When two vertices are being too close to each others, during the operation of "Remove Doubles", they merged together as it considered as a single vertex. It happens during my organic modelling, picture below shows before and after removing the doubles from my part of my mesh. Preserving quads topology is the primary, is there a solution to this problem?
Constraint:
This part of the mesh is limited to this size proportion. In other words, it's not rational to just scale up these faces to avoid the problem.
Assumption:
I assumed ensuring no doubles exists is important for avoiding the problem of "Bone Heat Weighting:Failed to find solution for one or more bones." during parenting mesh to rigs with automatic weights.
Solution tried:
Scaling up the mesh by factor of 10 or 20, but it doesn't help in blender to not consider the vertices as doubles.
modeling topology
asked May 18 at 23:14
AceryLAceryL
355
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Problem:
When two vertices are being too close to each others, during the operation of "Remove Doubles", they merged together as it considered as a single vertex. It happens during my organic modelling, picture below shows before and after removing the doubles from my part of my mesh. Preserving quads topology is the primary, is there a solution to this problem?
Constraint:
This part of the mesh is limited to this size proportion. In other words, it's not rational to just scale up these faces to avoid the problem.
Assumption:
I assumed ensuring no doubles exists is important for avoiding the problem of "Bone Heat Weighting:Failed to find solution for one or more bones." during parenting mesh to rigs with automatic weights.
Solution tried:
Scaling up the mesh by factor of 10 or 20, but it doesn't help in blender to not consider the vertices as doubles.
modeling topology
asked May 18 at 23:14
AceryLAceryL
355
$endgroup$
Problem:
When two vertices are being too close to each others, during the operation of "Remove Doubles", they merged together as it considered as a single vertex. It happens during my organic modelling, picture below shows before and after removing the doubles from my part of my mesh. Preserving quads topology is the primary, is there a solution to this problem?
Constraint:
This part of the mesh is limited to this size proportion. In other words, it's not rational to just scale up these faces to avoid the problem.
Assumption:
I assumed ensuring no doubles exists is important for avoiding the problem of "Bone Heat Weighting:Failed to find solution for one or more bones." during parenting mesh to rigs with automatic weights.
Solution tried:
Scaling up the mesh by factor of 10 or 20, but it doesn't help in blender to not consider the vertices as doubles.
modeling topology
modeling topology
asked May 18 at 23:14
AceryLAceryL
355
asked May 18 at 23:14
AceryLAceryL
355
asked May 18 at 23:14
AceryLAceryL
355
asked May 18 at 23:14
AceryLAceryL
355
asked May 18 at 23:14
AceryLAceryL
355
355
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
From what I have seen, you should try adjusting the merge distance. This can be found in the bottom of the tools panel after you remove doubles.
This process will adjust the limit for considering something a "double".
answered May 18 at 23:36
sac396sac396
986
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That helps, Thank you!
$endgroup$
– AceryL
May 19 at 0:44
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "502"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fblender.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f140917%2fremoving-doubles-destroy-topology%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
From what I have seen, you should try adjusting the merge distance. This can be found in the bottom of the tools panel after you remove doubles.
This process will adjust the limit for considering something a "double".
answered May 18 at 23:36
sac396sac396
986
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That helps, Thank you!
$endgroup$
– AceryL
May 19 at 0:44
add a comment |
$begingroup$
From what I have seen, you should try adjusting the merge distance. This can be found in the bottom of the tools panel after you remove doubles.
This process will adjust the limit for considering something a "double".
answered May 18 at 23:36
sac396sac396
986
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
That helps, Thank you!
$endgroup$
– AceryL
May 19 at 0:44
add a comment |
$begingroup$
From what I have seen, you should try adjusting the merge distance. This can be found in the bottom of the tools panel after you remove doubles.
This process will adjust the limit for considering something a "double".
answered May 18 at 23:36
sac396sac396
986
$endgroup$
From what I have seen, you should try adjusting the merge distance. This can be found in the bottom of the tools panel after you remove doubles.
This process will adjust the limit for considering something a "double".
answered May 18 at 23:36
sac396sac396
986
answered May 18 at 23:36
sac396sac396
986
answered May 18 at 23:36
sac396sac396
986
answered May 18 at 23:36
sac396sac396
986
986
$begingroup$
That helps, Thank you!
$endgroup$
– AceryL
May 19 at 0:44
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That helps, Thank you!
$endgroup$
– AceryL
May 19 at 0:44
$begingroup$
That helps, Thank you!
$endgroup$
– AceryL
May 19 at 0:44
$begingroup$
That helps, Thank you!
$endgroup$
– AceryL
May 19 at 0:44
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Blender Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fblender.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f140917%2fremoving-doubles-destroy-topology%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
