Active Directory full forest recovery - Doubts about obscure sentence in MS documentationWindows Active Directory naming best practices?Promoting Active Directory external forest trust to full forest trustActive Directory disaster recovery with DPMDomain Controller DNS Best Practice/Practical Considerations for Domain Controllers in Child DomainsActive Directory Domain Controller in Multiple Sites - Server 2012Naming a new Active Directory forest - why is split-horizon DNS not recommended?one of the single dc per domain DCs has suffered USN rollbackAllowing LDAP authentication from DMZ to Active Directory. Is my idea secure?Active Directory migration from Windows 2003 to Windows 2016Active Directory Domain same as web domain

Multi tool use
Multi tool use

Pass variable to cat

Side by side histograms

How to connect an offset point symbol to its original position in QGIS?

Does any lore text explain why the planes of Acheron, Gehenna, and Carceri are the alignment they are?

Why is Colorado so different politically from nearby states?

Applicants clearly not having the skills they advertise

What are the words for people who cause trouble believing they know better?

What are the words for people who cause trouble believing they know better?

How much water is needed to create a Katana capable of cutting flesh, bones and wood?

PhD student with mental health issues and bad performance

Does the growth of home value benefit from compound interest?

Is it a problem that pull requests are approved without any comments

Did Darth Vader wear the same suit for 20+ years?

Diet Coke or water?

Can a magnetic field of an object be stronger than its gravity?

Is the decompression of compressed and encrypted data without decryption also theoretically impossible?

Align text within align

Is there any word or phrase for negative bearing?

Accidentally cashed a check twice

Personalization conditions switching doesn`t work in Experience Editor (9.1.0, Initial Release)

Regarding eBGP Multipath

Is it legal in the UK for politicians to lie to the public for political gain?

How were concentration and extermination camp guards recruited?

What happens if you do emergency landing on a US base in middle of the ocean?



Active Directory full forest recovery - Doubts about obscure sentence in MS documentation


Windows Active Directory naming best practices?Promoting Active Directory external forest trust to full forest trustActive Directory disaster recovery with DPMDomain Controller DNS Best Practice/Practical Considerations for Domain Controllers in Child DomainsActive Directory Domain Controller in Multiple Sites - Server 2012Naming a new Active Directory forest - why is split-horizon DNS not recommended?one of the single dc per domain DCs has suffered USN rollbackAllowing LDAP authentication from DMZ to Active Directory. Is my idea secure?Active Directory migration from Windows 2003 to Windows 2016Active Directory Domain same as web domain






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








0















I am trying to apply and test best practices about Active Directory full forest recovery as warmly advised in “Best Practices for Implementing Schema Updates or : How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Forest Recovery” and thoroughly explained in “AD Forest Recovery Guide”.



However, this note is to me really obscure: “Caution: Perform an authoritative (or primary) restore operation of SYSVOL only for the first DC to be restored in the forest root domain. Incorrectly performing primary restore operations of the SYSVOL on other DCs leads to replication conflicts of SYSVOL data.” (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/identity/ad-ds/manage/ad-forest-recovery-perform-initial-recovery)



What are the motivations of not to perform an authoritative restore of SYSVOL once per domain but only once per forest (in the root domain)? SYSVOL isnt’it replicated just at the domain level? So, wouldn’t it be correct to perform an authoritative restore of one only SYSVOL for each domain of the forest (the one of the recovered DC for each domain of the forest) instead that just on the root domain? The conflict shouldn’t arise just only if I set as authoritative the SYSVOL folder in more than one DC in the same domain?
It is only a Microsoft typo (less likely but possible) or am I missing something (surely more likely)?



Thanks, Diego










share|improve this question




























    0















    I am trying to apply and test best practices about Active Directory full forest recovery as warmly advised in “Best Practices for Implementing Schema Updates or : How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Forest Recovery” and thoroughly explained in “AD Forest Recovery Guide”.



    However, this note is to me really obscure: “Caution: Perform an authoritative (or primary) restore operation of SYSVOL only for the first DC to be restored in the forest root domain. Incorrectly performing primary restore operations of the SYSVOL on other DCs leads to replication conflicts of SYSVOL data.” (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/identity/ad-ds/manage/ad-forest-recovery-perform-initial-recovery)



    What are the motivations of not to perform an authoritative restore of SYSVOL once per domain but only once per forest (in the root domain)? SYSVOL isnt’it replicated just at the domain level? So, wouldn’t it be correct to perform an authoritative restore of one only SYSVOL for each domain of the forest (the one of the recovered DC for each domain of the forest) instead that just on the root domain? The conflict shouldn’t arise just only if I set as authoritative the SYSVOL folder in more than one DC in the same domain?
    It is only a Microsoft typo (less likely but possible) or am I missing something (surely more likely)?



    Thanks, Diego










    share|improve this question
























      0












      0








      0








      I am trying to apply and test best practices about Active Directory full forest recovery as warmly advised in “Best Practices for Implementing Schema Updates or : How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Forest Recovery” and thoroughly explained in “AD Forest Recovery Guide”.



      However, this note is to me really obscure: “Caution: Perform an authoritative (or primary) restore operation of SYSVOL only for the first DC to be restored in the forest root domain. Incorrectly performing primary restore operations of the SYSVOL on other DCs leads to replication conflicts of SYSVOL data.” (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/identity/ad-ds/manage/ad-forest-recovery-perform-initial-recovery)



      What are the motivations of not to perform an authoritative restore of SYSVOL once per domain but only once per forest (in the root domain)? SYSVOL isnt’it replicated just at the domain level? So, wouldn’t it be correct to perform an authoritative restore of one only SYSVOL for each domain of the forest (the one of the recovered DC for each domain of the forest) instead that just on the root domain? The conflict shouldn’t arise just only if I set as authoritative the SYSVOL folder in more than one DC in the same domain?
      It is only a Microsoft typo (less likely but possible) or am I missing something (surely more likely)?



      Thanks, Diego










      share|improve this question














      I am trying to apply and test best practices about Active Directory full forest recovery as warmly advised in “Best Practices for Implementing Schema Updates or : How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Forest Recovery” and thoroughly explained in “AD Forest Recovery Guide”.



      However, this note is to me really obscure: “Caution: Perform an authoritative (or primary) restore operation of SYSVOL only for the first DC to be restored in the forest root domain. Incorrectly performing primary restore operations of the SYSVOL on other DCs leads to replication conflicts of SYSVOL data.” (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/identity/ad-ds/manage/ad-forest-recovery-perform-initial-recovery)



      What are the motivations of not to perform an authoritative restore of SYSVOL once per domain but only once per forest (in the root domain)? SYSVOL isnt’it replicated just at the domain level? So, wouldn’t it be correct to perform an authoritative restore of one only SYSVOL for each domain of the forest (the one of the recovered DC for each domain of the forest) instead that just on the root domain? The conflict shouldn’t arise just only if I set as authoritative the SYSVOL folder in more than one DC in the same domain?
      It is only a Microsoft typo (less likely but possible) or am I missing something (surely more likely)?



      Thanks, Diego







      active-directory disaster-recovery best-practices






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked May 18 at 21:22









      Diego ADiego A

      83




      83




















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "2"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f967915%2factive-directory-full-forest-recovery-doubts-about-obscure-sentence-in-ms-docu%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f967915%2factive-directory-full-forest-recovery-doubts-about-obscure-sentence-in-ms-docu%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          mx,F tN6E9NQYfdYMWnqZRXju l6pzJS,5R,5,7C2u,lncRNHvFTlaf8BA E7Br4kW vxKf,s6O GzQ3fjNfD,7OAM,i
          zzjd1Y4NsuPkeFU1ygu,g7BN pkAwDhAf,z11R8ur7JX EENQ,rWAK7 U6Rc0p,Qi0A7UdO0 B4lEoQvI nNDdw2 Ww1YFrK 6z3IP,RM,RTx

          Popular posts from this blog

          RemoteApp sporadic failureWindows 2008 RemoteAPP client disconnects within a matter of minutesWhat is the minimum version of RDP supported by Server 2012 RDS?How to configure a Remoteapp server to increase stabilityMicrosoft RemoteApp Active SessionRDWeb TS connection broken for some users post RemoteApp certificate changeRemote Desktop Licensing, RemoteAPPRDS 2012 R2 some users are not able to logon after changed date and time on Connection BrokersWhat happens during Remote Desktop logon, and is there any logging?After installing RDS on WinServer 2016 I still can only connect with two users?RD Connection via RDGW to Session host is not connecting

          Vilaño, A Laracha Índice Patrimonio | Lugares e parroquias | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación43°14′52″N 8°36′03″O / 43.24775, -8.60070

          Cegueira Índice Epidemioloxía | Deficiencia visual | Tipos de cegueira | Principais causas de cegueira | Tratamento | Técnicas de adaptación e axudas | Vida dos cegos | Primeiros auxilios | Crenzas respecto das persoas cegas | Crenzas das persoas cegas | O neno deficiente visual | Aspectos psicolóxicos da cegueira | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación54.054.154.436928256blindnessDicionario da Real Academia GalegaPortal das Palabras"International Standards: Visual Standards — Aspects and Ranges of Vision Loss with Emphasis on Population Surveys.""Visual impairment and blindness""Presentan un plan para previr a cegueira"o orixinalACCDV Associació Catalana de Cecs i Disminuïts Visuals - PMFTrachoma"Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis"1844137110.1056/NEJMoa0802268Cans guía - os mellores amigos dos cegosArquivadoEscola de cans guía para cegos en Mortágua, PortugalArquivado"Tecnología para ciegos y deficientes visuales. Recopilación de recursos gratuitos en la Red""Colorino""‘COL.diesis’, escuchar los sonidos del color""COL.diesis: Transforming Colour into Melody and Implementing the Result in a Colour Sensor Device"o orixinal"Sistema de desarrollo de sinestesia color-sonido para invidentes utilizando un protocolo de audio""Enseñanza táctil - geometría y color. Juegos didácticos para niños ciegos y videntes""Sistema Constanz"L'ocupació laboral dels cecs a l'Estat espanyol està pràcticament equiparada a la de les persones amb visió, entrevista amb Pedro ZuritaONCE (Organización Nacional de Cegos de España)Prevención da cegueiraDescrición de deficiencias visuais (Disc@pnet)Braillín, un boneco atractivo para calquera neno, con ou sen discapacidade, que permite familiarizarse co sistema de escritura e lectura brailleAxudas Técnicas36838ID00897494007150-90057129528256DOID:1432HP:0000618D001766C10.597.751.941.162C97109C0155020