Are there incongruent pythagorean triangles with the same perimeter and same area? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Ellipse 3-partition: same area and perimeterProve triangles with same perimeter and point of tangency of excircle and nine-point circle.Isosceles triangle has the least perimeter among triangles on the same base with same area?How many triangles with whole number leg lengths are there such that area and the perimeter is equal?Rectangle area and perimeter5 triangles with the same area inside a pentagonSimilar Triangles and the Pythagorean TheoremProve that a quadrilateral, and the quadrilateral formed by the orthocenters of four related triangles, have the same area.Dissect square into triangles of same perimeterUsing the pythagorean theorem and similar triangles

How to recreate this effect in Photoshop?

Storing hydrofluoric acid before the invention of plastics

Are my PIs rude or am I just being too sensitive?

How discoverable are IPv6 addresses and AAAA names by potential attackers?

What is the correct way to use the pinch test for dehydration?

Should I discuss the type of campaign with my players?

Can inflation occur in a positive-sum game currency system such as the Stack Exchange reputation system?

How do I mention the quality of my school without bragging

What's the purpose of writing one's academic bio in 3rd person?

Proof involving the spectral radius and Jordan Canonical form

If Jon Snow became King of the Seven Kingdoms what would his regnal number be?

How to find all the available tools in macOS terminal?

Is a manifold-with-boundary with given interior and non-empty boundary essentially unique?

If 'B is more likely given A', then 'A is more likely given B'

What do you call a phrase that's not an idiom yet?

How much radiation do nuclear physics experiments expose researchers to nowadays?

What does the "x" in "x86" represent?

When -s is used with third person singular. What's its use in this context?

Java 8 stream max() function argument type Comparator vs Comparable

What happens to sewage if there is no river near by?

What makes black pepper strong or mild?

Why are there no cargo aircraft with "flying wing" design?

Stars Make Stars

When to stop saving and start investing?



Are there incongruent pythagorean triangles with the same perimeter and same area?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Ellipse 3-partition: same area and perimeterProve triangles with same perimeter and point of tangency of excircle and nine-point circle.Isosceles triangle has the least perimeter among triangles on the same base with same area?How many triangles with whole number leg lengths are there such that area and the perimeter is equal?Rectangle area and perimeter5 triangles with the same area inside a pentagonSimilar Triangles and the Pythagorean TheoremProve that a quadrilateral, and the quadrilateral formed by the orthocenters of four related triangles, have the same area.Dissect square into triangles of same perimeterUsing the pythagorean theorem and similar triangles










8












$begingroup$


I found there are two incongruent isosceles triangles with integer sides and areas, where both have same perimeter, same area.



I looked around Dickson's History of Number Theory but couldn't find where the right triangle version is treated. [I thought if a nonexistence proof was simple it would pop up in my search, but found none.]



It may be simple to show none exist, but I had no luck, only filled few notebook pages with formulas going nowhere. Reference/example/proof appreciated. Thanks.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    8












    $begingroup$


    I found there are two incongruent isosceles triangles with integer sides and areas, where both have same perimeter, same area.



    I looked around Dickson's History of Number Theory but couldn't find where the right triangle version is treated. [I thought if a nonexistence proof was simple it would pop up in my search, but found none.]



    It may be simple to show none exist, but I had no luck, only filled few notebook pages with formulas going nowhere. Reference/example/proof appreciated. Thanks.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      8












      8








      8





      $begingroup$


      I found there are two incongruent isosceles triangles with integer sides and areas, where both have same perimeter, same area.



      I looked around Dickson's History of Number Theory but couldn't find where the right triangle version is treated. [I thought if a nonexistence proof was simple it would pop up in my search, but found none.]



      It may be simple to show none exist, but I had no luck, only filled few notebook pages with formulas going nowhere. Reference/example/proof appreciated. Thanks.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I found there are two incongruent isosceles triangles with integer sides and areas, where both have same perimeter, same area.



      I looked around Dickson's History of Number Theory but couldn't find where the right triangle version is treated. [I thought if a nonexistence proof was simple it would pop up in my search, but found none.]



      It may be simple to show none exist, but I had no luck, only filled few notebook pages with formulas going nowhere. Reference/example/proof appreciated. Thanks.







      geometry






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Apr 10 at 16:15









      Gregory Nisbet

      872712




      872712










      asked Apr 10 at 11:10









      coffeemathcoffeemath

      2,9691416




      2,9691416




















          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          9












          $begingroup$

          Consider two right triangles, with hypotenuses $p$ and $q$ and respective acute angles $theta$ and $phi$. To see that having equal perimeter and area makes them congruent, it suffices to show that
          $$theta = phi qquadtextorqquad theta+phi=fracpi2 tag0$$
          (Either makes the triangles similar, which in turn makes them congruent.)



          Equating perimeters and areas gives a system we can write as



          $$beginalign
          p(1+sintheta+costheta) &= q(1+sinphi+cosphi) \
          p^2 sintheta costheta &= q^2 sinphi cosphi
          endalign tag1$$



          Defining $u:=tan(theta/2)$, we "know" that
          $$sintheta = frac2u1+u^2 qquad costheta=frac1-u^21+u^2 quadtoquad 1+costheta+sintheta= frac2 (1 + u)1 + u^2$$
          and likewise for $v:=tan(phi/2)$. Thus, $(1)$ can be rewritten as
          $$beginalign
          pfrac(1+u)1+u^2 &= qfrac(1+v)1+v^2 \[4pt]
          p^2fracu(1+u)(1-u)(1+u^2)^2 &= q^2fracv(1+v)(1-v)(1+v^2)^2
          endaligntag2$$

          Dividing the second equation by the square of the first ...



          $$fracu(1-u)1+u = fracv(1-v)1+v quadtoquad (u-v)(uv+u+v-1)=0 quadtoquad u=v, text or fracu+v1-uv=1 tag3$$



          Therefore, we have one of the following situations (bearing in mind that $theta/2$ and $phi/2$ are each at most $pi/4$, so that we may draw appropriate conclusions from these tangent inequalities):
          $$beginalign
          tanfractheta2=tanfracphi2 &quadtoquad theta=phi \[4pt]
          fractan(theta/2)+tan(phi/2)1-tan(theta/2)tan(phi/2) = 1 &quadtoquad
          tanleft(fractheta2+fracphi2right)=tanfracpi4 quadtoquad theta+phi=fracpi2endalign tag4$$

          which match the sufficient conditions in $(0)$. $square$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




















            8












            $begingroup$

            Let $S$ be the circumference and $A$ twice the area of a triangle.



            Then,
            $$a_i+b_i+sqrta_i^2+b_i^2=S
            text and a_ib_i=A. tag1$$

            After squaring, $S^2+2A-2S(a_i+b_i)=0$ and from here $a_i+b_i=S/2+A/S$. Thus, $c_i=S-(a_i+b_i)=S/2-A/S=c$, that is, triangles have the same hypotenuse.



            Then, $a_i+b_i=S-c=T$ and $a_ib_i=A$, which results in a solutions for $a_i$ and $b_i$ expressed in terms of constants $A$ and $T$. Although one of the resulting equations is quadratic, there is a symmetric pair of solutions (thank you for comments below). Hence, all sides must be the same.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$








            • 3




              $begingroup$
              Really nice proof. I have a niggle with your last statement though. In general, $2$ equations with $2$ unknowns may well have multiple solutions if they are not linear. For example, the OP mentions isosceles triangles, where the triangles $(8,8,12)$ and $(6,11,11)$ have the same perimeter and area even though isosceles triangles are also parametrised by two variables. Of course, in your case you know the sum and product of $a$ and $b$, which is a particularly nice pair of equations well known to have a symmetric pair of solutions.
              $endgroup$
              – Jaap Scherphuis
              Apr 10 at 13:14











            • $begingroup$
              @Jaap Scherphuis -- Thank you for your comment and clarification.
              $endgroup$
              – dnqxt
              Apr 10 at 13:18











            • $begingroup$
              @Dawood ibn Kareem -- Thanks for the comment. I added in the answer the clarification made by Jaap Scherphuis.
              $endgroup$
              – dnqxt
              Apr 10 at 20:21


















            6












            $begingroup$

            Consider a right-angled triangle with sides $a$ and $b$.

            The hypotenuse has length $c=sqrta^2+b^2$.
            Its area is $ab/2$, and perimeter is $a+b+c$.



            I will allow $a,b,c$ to be any positive real numbers, not restrict them to positive integers.



            Suppose we scale the triangles such that $ab=1$, (i.e. an area of $1/2$). Is it possible to have two of these triangles that are distinct but with the same perimeter?



            We may assume that $a$ is the longer side, i.e. $a>b$, so we must have $a>1$.



            The perimeter is
            $$P(a) = a+b+c\ = a+b+sqrta^2+b^2\ = a+frac1a+sqrta^2+frac1a^2$$



            This is an increasing function on the interval $[1,infty)$ because its derivative w.r.t. $a$ is positive for $a>1$. This is tedious to check by hand, so I used Wolfram alpha. You can however understand why this is the case by noticing that if you increase $a$, then the rate at which $a$ increases is larger than the rate at which $1/a$ decreases, and the same holds for $a^2$ versus $1/a^2$.



            This means that there are no two values of $a$, both with $a>1$ for which you get the same perimeter.



            Bringing it back to the original problem, it means that there are no two right-angled triangles with the same perimeter and area, unless they have the same sides. Basically, given an area and a perimeter, their two equations uniquely determine the two triangle sides because the lines those equations represent are not curved enough to intersect multiple times.




            P.S. By the way, the OP mentioned that there are pairs of isosceles triangles with matching areas and perimeters, even when all sides and the area are integers. Two examples are:
            $(29,29,40)$ and $(37,37,24)$,

            and also
            $(218,218,240)$ and $(233,233,210)$.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              How to scale the 3,4,5 triangle so its area is 1/2? [i.e.$ab=1$ in notation you use.] By "scale" do you mean multiply all sides by some factor $k$ ?
              $endgroup$
              – coffeemath
              Apr 11 at 11:33







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Yes. Since in this case $ab=12$ you'd divide both sides by $sqrt12$, so that corresponds to $a=3/sqrt12=sqrt3/2$ and $b=4/sqrt12=2sqrt3/3$.
              $endgroup$
              – Jaap Scherphuis
              Apr 11 at 11:38



















            5












            $begingroup$

            The area and the perimeter uniquely define the radius of the inscribed circle because $A=frac12Pr$, and the hypotenuse because $r=fracP2-c$. That fixes both $a+b=P-c$ and $ab=2A$ so $a$ and $b$ are also unique up to permutation, QED.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$




















              2












              $begingroup$

              Long Comment:



              You can at least give the simple formulae for the perimeter $P$ and area $A$ of a right angle triangle.



              If $z^2=x^2+y^2$ is a primitive Pythagorean triangle with $x$ being the base of the triangle and $y$ being the height (due to the right angle), then $P=x+y+z$ and $A=frac12xy$



              Then you can quote the formulae for primitive Pythagorean Triples, where $z=left(a^2+b^2right)$, $x=left(a^2-b^2right)$ and $y=2ab$



              To expand to all the non primitive Pythagorean triangles we have



              $$(cz)^2=(cx)^2+(cy)^2$$



              Therefore



              $$P=a(2a+2b)c$$
              $$A=frac12 left(a^2-b^2right)(2ab)c^2=left(a^2-b^2right)abc^2$$



              For two incongruent Pythagorean triangles 1 and 2 the condition is



              $$P_1=P_2 ;;textand ;; A_1=A_2$$



              For Perimeter:
              $$a_1(2a_1+2b_1)c_1=a_2(2a_2+2b_2)c_2$$
              $$fraca_2+b_2a_1+b_1=fraca_1c_1a_2c_2tag1$$
              For Area:
              $$left(a_1^2-b_1^2right)a_1b_1c_1^2=left(a_2^2-b_2^2right)a_2b_2c_2^2$$
              $$fraca_2+b_2a_1+b_1=fraca_1c_1a_2c_2left(fracb_1c_1b_2c_2frac (a_1-b_1) (a_2-b_2) right)$$



              Therefore combining both gives



              $$b_1c_1(a_1-b_1)=b_2c_2(a_2-b_2)tag2$$



              Update:



              Using (1) and (2) we can eliminate the variables $c_1$ and $c_2$ eventually giving
              $$frac (a_2+b_2) a_2 (a_1+b_1) a_1 =frac (a_2-b_2) b_2 (a_1-b_1) b_1 $$
              or
              $$frac (a_2+b_2) a_2 (a_2-b_2) b_2 =frac (a_1+b_1) a_1 (a_1-b_1) b_1 $$






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$












              • $begingroup$
                In the version you use for primitive triples I think one needs $a,b$ odd and coprime, $a>b$ to give triples of positives. [That seems it would be known in that version…] I used the other version in my attempt, $p^2-q^2,2pq,p^2+q^2$ with $p,q$ coprime opposite parity and $p>q.$ Still didn't go to a finish in my attempts though.
                $endgroup$
                – coffeemath
                Apr 10 at 12:37






              • 1




                $begingroup$
                updated to your version
                $endgroup$
                – James Arathoon
                Apr 10 at 13:10











              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3182185%2fare-there-incongruent-pythagorean-triangles-with-the-same-perimeter-and-same-are%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              5 Answers
              5






              active

              oldest

              votes








              5 Answers
              5






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              9












              $begingroup$

              Consider two right triangles, with hypotenuses $p$ and $q$ and respective acute angles $theta$ and $phi$. To see that having equal perimeter and area makes them congruent, it suffices to show that
              $$theta = phi qquadtextorqquad theta+phi=fracpi2 tag0$$
              (Either makes the triangles similar, which in turn makes them congruent.)



              Equating perimeters and areas gives a system we can write as



              $$beginalign
              p(1+sintheta+costheta) &= q(1+sinphi+cosphi) \
              p^2 sintheta costheta &= q^2 sinphi cosphi
              endalign tag1$$



              Defining $u:=tan(theta/2)$, we "know" that
              $$sintheta = frac2u1+u^2 qquad costheta=frac1-u^21+u^2 quadtoquad 1+costheta+sintheta= frac2 (1 + u)1 + u^2$$
              and likewise for $v:=tan(phi/2)$. Thus, $(1)$ can be rewritten as
              $$beginalign
              pfrac(1+u)1+u^2 &= qfrac(1+v)1+v^2 \[4pt]
              p^2fracu(1+u)(1-u)(1+u^2)^2 &= q^2fracv(1+v)(1-v)(1+v^2)^2
              endaligntag2$$

              Dividing the second equation by the square of the first ...



              $$fracu(1-u)1+u = fracv(1-v)1+v quadtoquad (u-v)(uv+u+v-1)=0 quadtoquad u=v, text or fracu+v1-uv=1 tag3$$



              Therefore, we have one of the following situations (bearing in mind that $theta/2$ and $phi/2$ are each at most $pi/4$, so that we may draw appropriate conclusions from these tangent inequalities):
              $$beginalign
              tanfractheta2=tanfracphi2 &quadtoquad theta=phi \[4pt]
              fractan(theta/2)+tan(phi/2)1-tan(theta/2)tan(phi/2) = 1 &quadtoquad
              tanleft(fractheta2+fracphi2right)=tanfracpi4 quadtoquad theta+phi=fracpi2endalign tag4$$

              which match the sufficient conditions in $(0)$. $square$






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                9












                $begingroup$

                Consider two right triangles, with hypotenuses $p$ and $q$ and respective acute angles $theta$ and $phi$. To see that having equal perimeter and area makes them congruent, it suffices to show that
                $$theta = phi qquadtextorqquad theta+phi=fracpi2 tag0$$
                (Either makes the triangles similar, which in turn makes them congruent.)



                Equating perimeters and areas gives a system we can write as



                $$beginalign
                p(1+sintheta+costheta) &= q(1+sinphi+cosphi) \
                p^2 sintheta costheta &= q^2 sinphi cosphi
                endalign tag1$$



                Defining $u:=tan(theta/2)$, we "know" that
                $$sintheta = frac2u1+u^2 qquad costheta=frac1-u^21+u^2 quadtoquad 1+costheta+sintheta= frac2 (1 + u)1 + u^2$$
                and likewise for $v:=tan(phi/2)$. Thus, $(1)$ can be rewritten as
                $$beginalign
                pfrac(1+u)1+u^2 &= qfrac(1+v)1+v^2 \[4pt]
                p^2fracu(1+u)(1-u)(1+u^2)^2 &= q^2fracv(1+v)(1-v)(1+v^2)^2
                endaligntag2$$

                Dividing the second equation by the square of the first ...



                $$fracu(1-u)1+u = fracv(1-v)1+v quadtoquad (u-v)(uv+u+v-1)=0 quadtoquad u=v, text or fracu+v1-uv=1 tag3$$



                Therefore, we have one of the following situations (bearing in mind that $theta/2$ and $phi/2$ are each at most $pi/4$, so that we may draw appropriate conclusions from these tangent inequalities):
                $$beginalign
                tanfractheta2=tanfracphi2 &quadtoquad theta=phi \[4pt]
                fractan(theta/2)+tan(phi/2)1-tan(theta/2)tan(phi/2) = 1 &quadtoquad
                tanleft(fractheta2+fracphi2right)=tanfracpi4 quadtoquad theta+phi=fracpi2endalign tag4$$

                which match the sufficient conditions in $(0)$. $square$






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  9












                  9








                  9





                  $begingroup$

                  Consider two right triangles, with hypotenuses $p$ and $q$ and respective acute angles $theta$ and $phi$. To see that having equal perimeter and area makes them congruent, it suffices to show that
                  $$theta = phi qquadtextorqquad theta+phi=fracpi2 tag0$$
                  (Either makes the triangles similar, which in turn makes them congruent.)



                  Equating perimeters and areas gives a system we can write as



                  $$beginalign
                  p(1+sintheta+costheta) &= q(1+sinphi+cosphi) \
                  p^2 sintheta costheta &= q^2 sinphi cosphi
                  endalign tag1$$



                  Defining $u:=tan(theta/2)$, we "know" that
                  $$sintheta = frac2u1+u^2 qquad costheta=frac1-u^21+u^2 quadtoquad 1+costheta+sintheta= frac2 (1 + u)1 + u^2$$
                  and likewise for $v:=tan(phi/2)$. Thus, $(1)$ can be rewritten as
                  $$beginalign
                  pfrac(1+u)1+u^2 &= qfrac(1+v)1+v^2 \[4pt]
                  p^2fracu(1+u)(1-u)(1+u^2)^2 &= q^2fracv(1+v)(1-v)(1+v^2)^2
                  endaligntag2$$

                  Dividing the second equation by the square of the first ...



                  $$fracu(1-u)1+u = fracv(1-v)1+v quadtoquad (u-v)(uv+u+v-1)=0 quadtoquad u=v, text or fracu+v1-uv=1 tag3$$



                  Therefore, we have one of the following situations (bearing in mind that $theta/2$ and $phi/2$ are each at most $pi/4$, so that we may draw appropriate conclusions from these tangent inequalities):
                  $$beginalign
                  tanfractheta2=tanfracphi2 &quadtoquad theta=phi \[4pt]
                  fractan(theta/2)+tan(phi/2)1-tan(theta/2)tan(phi/2) = 1 &quadtoquad
                  tanleft(fractheta2+fracphi2right)=tanfracpi4 quadtoquad theta+phi=fracpi2endalign tag4$$

                  which match the sufficient conditions in $(0)$. $square$






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Consider two right triangles, with hypotenuses $p$ and $q$ and respective acute angles $theta$ and $phi$. To see that having equal perimeter and area makes them congruent, it suffices to show that
                  $$theta = phi qquadtextorqquad theta+phi=fracpi2 tag0$$
                  (Either makes the triangles similar, which in turn makes them congruent.)



                  Equating perimeters and areas gives a system we can write as



                  $$beginalign
                  p(1+sintheta+costheta) &= q(1+sinphi+cosphi) \
                  p^2 sintheta costheta &= q^2 sinphi cosphi
                  endalign tag1$$



                  Defining $u:=tan(theta/2)$, we "know" that
                  $$sintheta = frac2u1+u^2 qquad costheta=frac1-u^21+u^2 quadtoquad 1+costheta+sintheta= frac2 (1 + u)1 + u^2$$
                  and likewise for $v:=tan(phi/2)$. Thus, $(1)$ can be rewritten as
                  $$beginalign
                  pfrac(1+u)1+u^2 &= qfrac(1+v)1+v^2 \[4pt]
                  p^2fracu(1+u)(1-u)(1+u^2)^2 &= q^2fracv(1+v)(1-v)(1+v^2)^2
                  endaligntag2$$

                  Dividing the second equation by the square of the first ...



                  $$fracu(1-u)1+u = fracv(1-v)1+v quadtoquad (u-v)(uv+u+v-1)=0 quadtoquad u=v, text or fracu+v1-uv=1 tag3$$



                  Therefore, we have one of the following situations (bearing in mind that $theta/2$ and $phi/2$ are each at most $pi/4$, so that we may draw appropriate conclusions from these tangent inequalities):
                  $$beginalign
                  tanfractheta2=tanfracphi2 &quadtoquad theta=phi \[4pt]
                  fractan(theta/2)+tan(phi/2)1-tan(theta/2)tan(phi/2) = 1 &quadtoquad
                  tanleft(fractheta2+fracphi2right)=tanfracpi4 quadtoquad theta+phi=fracpi2endalign tag4$$

                  which match the sufficient conditions in $(0)$. $square$







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Apr 10 at 15:21









                  BlueBlue

                  49.7k870158




                  49.7k870158





















                      8












                      $begingroup$

                      Let $S$ be the circumference and $A$ twice the area of a triangle.



                      Then,
                      $$a_i+b_i+sqrta_i^2+b_i^2=S
                      text and a_ib_i=A. tag1$$

                      After squaring, $S^2+2A-2S(a_i+b_i)=0$ and from here $a_i+b_i=S/2+A/S$. Thus, $c_i=S-(a_i+b_i)=S/2-A/S=c$, that is, triangles have the same hypotenuse.



                      Then, $a_i+b_i=S-c=T$ and $a_ib_i=A$, which results in a solutions for $a_i$ and $b_i$ expressed in terms of constants $A$ and $T$. Although one of the resulting equations is quadratic, there is a symmetric pair of solutions (thank you for comments below). Hence, all sides must be the same.






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$








                      • 3




                        $begingroup$
                        Really nice proof. I have a niggle with your last statement though. In general, $2$ equations with $2$ unknowns may well have multiple solutions if they are not linear. For example, the OP mentions isosceles triangles, where the triangles $(8,8,12)$ and $(6,11,11)$ have the same perimeter and area even though isosceles triangles are also parametrised by two variables. Of course, in your case you know the sum and product of $a$ and $b$, which is a particularly nice pair of equations well known to have a symmetric pair of solutions.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Jaap Scherphuis
                        Apr 10 at 13:14











                      • $begingroup$
                        @Jaap Scherphuis -- Thank you for your comment and clarification.
                        $endgroup$
                        – dnqxt
                        Apr 10 at 13:18











                      • $begingroup$
                        @Dawood ibn Kareem -- Thanks for the comment. I added in the answer the clarification made by Jaap Scherphuis.
                        $endgroup$
                        – dnqxt
                        Apr 10 at 20:21















                      8












                      $begingroup$

                      Let $S$ be the circumference and $A$ twice the area of a triangle.



                      Then,
                      $$a_i+b_i+sqrta_i^2+b_i^2=S
                      text and a_ib_i=A. tag1$$

                      After squaring, $S^2+2A-2S(a_i+b_i)=0$ and from here $a_i+b_i=S/2+A/S$. Thus, $c_i=S-(a_i+b_i)=S/2-A/S=c$, that is, triangles have the same hypotenuse.



                      Then, $a_i+b_i=S-c=T$ and $a_ib_i=A$, which results in a solutions for $a_i$ and $b_i$ expressed in terms of constants $A$ and $T$. Although one of the resulting equations is quadratic, there is a symmetric pair of solutions (thank you for comments below). Hence, all sides must be the same.






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$








                      • 3




                        $begingroup$
                        Really nice proof. I have a niggle with your last statement though. In general, $2$ equations with $2$ unknowns may well have multiple solutions if they are not linear. For example, the OP mentions isosceles triangles, where the triangles $(8,8,12)$ and $(6,11,11)$ have the same perimeter and area even though isosceles triangles are also parametrised by two variables. Of course, in your case you know the sum and product of $a$ and $b$, which is a particularly nice pair of equations well known to have a symmetric pair of solutions.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Jaap Scherphuis
                        Apr 10 at 13:14











                      • $begingroup$
                        @Jaap Scherphuis -- Thank you for your comment and clarification.
                        $endgroup$
                        – dnqxt
                        Apr 10 at 13:18











                      • $begingroup$
                        @Dawood ibn Kareem -- Thanks for the comment. I added in the answer the clarification made by Jaap Scherphuis.
                        $endgroup$
                        – dnqxt
                        Apr 10 at 20:21













                      8












                      8








                      8





                      $begingroup$

                      Let $S$ be the circumference and $A$ twice the area of a triangle.



                      Then,
                      $$a_i+b_i+sqrta_i^2+b_i^2=S
                      text and a_ib_i=A. tag1$$

                      After squaring, $S^2+2A-2S(a_i+b_i)=0$ and from here $a_i+b_i=S/2+A/S$. Thus, $c_i=S-(a_i+b_i)=S/2-A/S=c$, that is, triangles have the same hypotenuse.



                      Then, $a_i+b_i=S-c=T$ and $a_ib_i=A$, which results in a solutions for $a_i$ and $b_i$ expressed in terms of constants $A$ and $T$. Although one of the resulting equations is quadratic, there is a symmetric pair of solutions (thank you for comments below). Hence, all sides must be the same.






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$



                      Let $S$ be the circumference and $A$ twice the area of a triangle.



                      Then,
                      $$a_i+b_i+sqrta_i^2+b_i^2=S
                      text and a_ib_i=A. tag1$$

                      After squaring, $S^2+2A-2S(a_i+b_i)=0$ and from here $a_i+b_i=S/2+A/S$. Thus, $c_i=S-(a_i+b_i)=S/2-A/S=c$, that is, triangles have the same hypotenuse.



                      Then, $a_i+b_i=S-c=T$ and $a_ib_i=A$, which results in a solutions for $a_i$ and $b_i$ expressed in terms of constants $A$ and $T$. Although one of the resulting equations is quadratic, there is a symmetric pair of solutions (thank you for comments below). Hence, all sides must be the same.







                      share|cite|improve this answer














                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer








                      edited Apr 10 at 20:19

























                      answered Apr 10 at 12:54









                      dnqxtdnqxt

                      7425




                      7425







                      • 3




                        $begingroup$
                        Really nice proof. I have a niggle with your last statement though. In general, $2$ equations with $2$ unknowns may well have multiple solutions if they are not linear. For example, the OP mentions isosceles triangles, where the triangles $(8,8,12)$ and $(6,11,11)$ have the same perimeter and area even though isosceles triangles are also parametrised by two variables. Of course, in your case you know the sum and product of $a$ and $b$, which is a particularly nice pair of equations well known to have a symmetric pair of solutions.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Jaap Scherphuis
                        Apr 10 at 13:14











                      • $begingroup$
                        @Jaap Scherphuis -- Thank you for your comment and clarification.
                        $endgroup$
                        – dnqxt
                        Apr 10 at 13:18











                      • $begingroup$
                        @Dawood ibn Kareem -- Thanks for the comment. I added in the answer the clarification made by Jaap Scherphuis.
                        $endgroup$
                        – dnqxt
                        Apr 10 at 20:21












                      • 3




                        $begingroup$
                        Really nice proof. I have a niggle with your last statement though. In general, $2$ equations with $2$ unknowns may well have multiple solutions if they are not linear. For example, the OP mentions isosceles triangles, where the triangles $(8,8,12)$ and $(6,11,11)$ have the same perimeter and area even though isosceles triangles are also parametrised by two variables. Of course, in your case you know the sum and product of $a$ and $b$, which is a particularly nice pair of equations well known to have a symmetric pair of solutions.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Jaap Scherphuis
                        Apr 10 at 13:14











                      • $begingroup$
                        @Jaap Scherphuis -- Thank you for your comment and clarification.
                        $endgroup$
                        – dnqxt
                        Apr 10 at 13:18











                      • $begingroup$
                        @Dawood ibn Kareem -- Thanks for the comment. I added in the answer the clarification made by Jaap Scherphuis.
                        $endgroup$
                        – dnqxt
                        Apr 10 at 20:21







                      3




                      3




                      $begingroup$
                      Really nice proof. I have a niggle with your last statement though. In general, $2$ equations with $2$ unknowns may well have multiple solutions if they are not linear. For example, the OP mentions isosceles triangles, where the triangles $(8,8,12)$ and $(6,11,11)$ have the same perimeter and area even though isosceles triangles are also parametrised by two variables. Of course, in your case you know the sum and product of $a$ and $b$, which is a particularly nice pair of equations well known to have a symmetric pair of solutions.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Jaap Scherphuis
                      Apr 10 at 13:14





                      $begingroup$
                      Really nice proof. I have a niggle with your last statement though. In general, $2$ equations with $2$ unknowns may well have multiple solutions if they are not linear. For example, the OP mentions isosceles triangles, where the triangles $(8,8,12)$ and $(6,11,11)$ have the same perimeter and area even though isosceles triangles are also parametrised by two variables. Of course, in your case you know the sum and product of $a$ and $b$, which is a particularly nice pair of equations well known to have a symmetric pair of solutions.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Jaap Scherphuis
                      Apr 10 at 13:14













                      $begingroup$
                      @Jaap Scherphuis -- Thank you for your comment and clarification.
                      $endgroup$
                      – dnqxt
                      Apr 10 at 13:18





                      $begingroup$
                      @Jaap Scherphuis -- Thank you for your comment and clarification.
                      $endgroup$
                      – dnqxt
                      Apr 10 at 13:18













                      $begingroup$
                      @Dawood ibn Kareem -- Thanks for the comment. I added in the answer the clarification made by Jaap Scherphuis.
                      $endgroup$
                      – dnqxt
                      Apr 10 at 20:21




                      $begingroup$
                      @Dawood ibn Kareem -- Thanks for the comment. I added in the answer the clarification made by Jaap Scherphuis.
                      $endgroup$
                      – dnqxt
                      Apr 10 at 20:21











                      6












                      $begingroup$

                      Consider a right-angled triangle with sides $a$ and $b$.

                      The hypotenuse has length $c=sqrta^2+b^2$.
                      Its area is $ab/2$, and perimeter is $a+b+c$.



                      I will allow $a,b,c$ to be any positive real numbers, not restrict them to positive integers.



                      Suppose we scale the triangles such that $ab=1$, (i.e. an area of $1/2$). Is it possible to have two of these triangles that are distinct but with the same perimeter?



                      We may assume that $a$ is the longer side, i.e. $a>b$, so we must have $a>1$.



                      The perimeter is
                      $$P(a) = a+b+c\ = a+b+sqrta^2+b^2\ = a+frac1a+sqrta^2+frac1a^2$$



                      This is an increasing function on the interval $[1,infty)$ because its derivative w.r.t. $a$ is positive for $a>1$. This is tedious to check by hand, so I used Wolfram alpha. You can however understand why this is the case by noticing that if you increase $a$, then the rate at which $a$ increases is larger than the rate at which $1/a$ decreases, and the same holds for $a^2$ versus $1/a^2$.



                      This means that there are no two values of $a$, both with $a>1$ for which you get the same perimeter.



                      Bringing it back to the original problem, it means that there are no two right-angled triangles with the same perimeter and area, unless they have the same sides. Basically, given an area and a perimeter, their two equations uniquely determine the two triangle sides because the lines those equations represent are not curved enough to intersect multiple times.




                      P.S. By the way, the OP mentioned that there are pairs of isosceles triangles with matching areas and perimeters, even when all sides and the area are integers. Two examples are:
                      $(29,29,40)$ and $(37,37,24)$,

                      and also
                      $(218,218,240)$ and $(233,233,210)$.






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$












                      • $begingroup$
                        How to scale the 3,4,5 triangle so its area is 1/2? [i.e.$ab=1$ in notation you use.] By "scale" do you mean multiply all sides by some factor $k$ ?
                        $endgroup$
                        – coffeemath
                        Apr 11 at 11:33







                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Yes. Since in this case $ab=12$ you'd divide both sides by $sqrt12$, so that corresponds to $a=3/sqrt12=sqrt3/2$ and $b=4/sqrt12=2sqrt3/3$.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Jaap Scherphuis
                        Apr 11 at 11:38
















                      6












                      $begingroup$

                      Consider a right-angled triangle with sides $a$ and $b$.

                      The hypotenuse has length $c=sqrta^2+b^2$.
                      Its area is $ab/2$, and perimeter is $a+b+c$.



                      I will allow $a,b,c$ to be any positive real numbers, not restrict them to positive integers.



                      Suppose we scale the triangles such that $ab=1$, (i.e. an area of $1/2$). Is it possible to have two of these triangles that are distinct but with the same perimeter?



                      We may assume that $a$ is the longer side, i.e. $a>b$, so we must have $a>1$.



                      The perimeter is
                      $$P(a) = a+b+c\ = a+b+sqrta^2+b^2\ = a+frac1a+sqrta^2+frac1a^2$$



                      This is an increasing function on the interval $[1,infty)$ because its derivative w.r.t. $a$ is positive for $a>1$. This is tedious to check by hand, so I used Wolfram alpha. You can however understand why this is the case by noticing that if you increase $a$, then the rate at which $a$ increases is larger than the rate at which $1/a$ decreases, and the same holds for $a^2$ versus $1/a^2$.



                      This means that there are no two values of $a$, both with $a>1$ for which you get the same perimeter.



                      Bringing it back to the original problem, it means that there are no two right-angled triangles with the same perimeter and area, unless they have the same sides. Basically, given an area and a perimeter, their two equations uniquely determine the two triangle sides because the lines those equations represent are not curved enough to intersect multiple times.




                      P.S. By the way, the OP mentioned that there are pairs of isosceles triangles with matching areas and perimeters, even when all sides and the area are integers. Two examples are:
                      $(29,29,40)$ and $(37,37,24)$,

                      and also
                      $(218,218,240)$ and $(233,233,210)$.






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$












                      • $begingroup$
                        How to scale the 3,4,5 triangle so its area is 1/2? [i.e.$ab=1$ in notation you use.] By "scale" do you mean multiply all sides by some factor $k$ ?
                        $endgroup$
                        – coffeemath
                        Apr 11 at 11:33







                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Yes. Since in this case $ab=12$ you'd divide both sides by $sqrt12$, so that corresponds to $a=3/sqrt12=sqrt3/2$ and $b=4/sqrt12=2sqrt3/3$.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Jaap Scherphuis
                        Apr 11 at 11:38














                      6












                      6








                      6





                      $begingroup$

                      Consider a right-angled triangle with sides $a$ and $b$.

                      The hypotenuse has length $c=sqrta^2+b^2$.
                      Its area is $ab/2$, and perimeter is $a+b+c$.



                      I will allow $a,b,c$ to be any positive real numbers, not restrict them to positive integers.



                      Suppose we scale the triangles such that $ab=1$, (i.e. an area of $1/2$). Is it possible to have two of these triangles that are distinct but with the same perimeter?



                      We may assume that $a$ is the longer side, i.e. $a>b$, so we must have $a>1$.



                      The perimeter is
                      $$P(a) = a+b+c\ = a+b+sqrta^2+b^2\ = a+frac1a+sqrta^2+frac1a^2$$



                      This is an increasing function on the interval $[1,infty)$ because its derivative w.r.t. $a$ is positive for $a>1$. This is tedious to check by hand, so I used Wolfram alpha. You can however understand why this is the case by noticing that if you increase $a$, then the rate at which $a$ increases is larger than the rate at which $1/a$ decreases, and the same holds for $a^2$ versus $1/a^2$.



                      This means that there are no two values of $a$, both with $a>1$ for which you get the same perimeter.



                      Bringing it back to the original problem, it means that there are no two right-angled triangles with the same perimeter and area, unless they have the same sides. Basically, given an area and a perimeter, their two equations uniquely determine the two triangle sides because the lines those equations represent are not curved enough to intersect multiple times.




                      P.S. By the way, the OP mentioned that there are pairs of isosceles triangles with matching areas and perimeters, even when all sides and the area are integers. Two examples are:
                      $(29,29,40)$ and $(37,37,24)$,

                      and also
                      $(218,218,240)$ and $(233,233,210)$.






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$



                      Consider a right-angled triangle with sides $a$ and $b$.

                      The hypotenuse has length $c=sqrta^2+b^2$.
                      Its area is $ab/2$, and perimeter is $a+b+c$.



                      I will allow $a,b,c$ to be any positive real numbers, not restrict them to positive integers.



                      Suppose we scale the triangles such that $ab=1$, (i.e. an area of $1/2$). Is it possible to have two of these triangles that are distinct but with the same perimeter?



                      We may assume that $a$ is the longer side, i.e. $a>b$, so we must have $a>1$.



                      The perimeter is
                      $$P(a) = a+b+c\ = a+b+sqrta^2+b^2\ = a+frac1a+sqrta^2+frac1a^2$$



                      This is an increasing function on the interval $[1,infty)$ because its derivative w.r.t. $a$ is positive for $a>1$. This is tedious to check by hand, so I used Wolfram alpha. You can however understand why this is the case by noticing that if you increase $a$, then the rate at which $a$ increases is larger than the rate at which $1/a$ decreases, and the same holds for $a^2$ versus $1/a^2$.



                      This means that there are no two values of $a$, both with $a>1$ for which you get the same perimeter.



                      Bringing it back to the original problem, it means that there are no two right-angled triangles with the same perimeter and area, unless they have the same sides. Basically, given an area and a perimeter, their two equations uniquely determine the two triangle sides because the lines those equations represent are not curved enough to intersect multiple times.




                      P.S. By the way, the OP mentioned that there are pairs of isosceles triangles with matching areas and perimeters, even when all sides and the area are integers. Two examples are:
                      $(29,29,40)$ and $(37,37,24)$,

                      and also
                      $(218,218,240)$ and $(233,233,210)$.







                      share|cite|improve this answer














                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer








                      edited Apr 10 at 15:47

























                      answered Apr 10 at 12:56









                      Jaap ScherphuisJaap Scherphuis

                      4,362817




                      4,362817











                      • $begingroup$
                        How to scale the 3,4,5 triangle so its area is 1/2? [i.e.$ab=1$ in notation you use.] By "scale" do you mean multiply all sides by some factor $k$ ?
                        $endgroup$
                        – coffeemath
                        Apr 11 at 11:33







                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Yes. Since in this case $ab=12$ you'd divide both sides by $sqrt12$, so that corresponds to $a=3/sqrt12=sqrt3/2$ and $b=4/sqrt12=2sqrt3/3$.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Jaap Scherphuis
                        Apr 11 at 11:38

















                      • $begingroup$
                        How to scale the 3,4,5 triangle so its area is 1/2? [i.e.$ab=1$ in notation you use.] By "scale" do you mean multiply all sides by some factor $k$ ?
                        $endgroup$
                        – coffeemath
                        Apr 11 at 11:33







                      • 1




                        $begingroup$
                        Yes. Since in this case $ab=12$ you'd divide both sides by $sqrt12$, so that corresponds to $a=3/sqrt12=sqrt3/2$ and $b=4/sqrt12=2sqrt3/3$.
                        $endgroup$
                        – Jaap Scherphuis
                        Apr 11 at 11:38
















                      $begingroup$
                      How to scale the 3,4,5 triangle so its area is 1/2? [i.e.$ab=1$ in notation you use.] By "scale" do you mean multiply all sides by some factor $k$ ?
                      $endgroup$
                      – coffeemath
                      Apr 11 at 11:33





                      $begingroup$
                      How to scale the 3,4,5 triangle so its area is 1/2? [i.e.$ab=1$ in notation you use.] By "scale" do you mean multiply all sides by some factor $k$ ?
                      $endgroup$
                      – coffeemath
                      Apr 11 at 11:33





                      1




                      1




                      $begingroup$
                      Yes. Since in this case $ab=12$ you'd divide both sides by $sqrt12$, so that corresponds to $a=3/sqrt12=sqrt3/2$ and $b=4/sqrt12=2sqrt3/3$.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Jaap Scherphuis
                      Apr 11 at 11:38





                      $begingroup$
                      Yes. Since in this case $ab=12$ you'd divide both sides by $sqrt12$, so that corresponds to $a=3/sqrt12=sqrt3/2$ and $b=4/sqrt12=2sqrt3/3$.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Jaap Scherphuis
                      Apr 11 at 11:38












                      5












                      $begingroup$

                      The area and the perimeter uniquely define the radius of the inscribed circle because $A=frac12Pr$, and the hypotenuse because $r=fracP2-c$. That fixes both $a+b=P-c$ and $ab=2A$ so $a$ and $b$ are also unique up to permutation, QED.






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$

















                        5












                        $begingroup$

                        The area and the perimeter uniquely define the radius of the inscribed circle because $A=frac12Pr$, and the hypotenuse because $r=fracP2-c$. That fixes both $a+b=P-c$ and $ab=2A$ so $a$ and $b$ are also unique up to permutation, QED.






                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$















                          5












                          5








                          5





                          $begingroup$

                          The area and the perimeter uniquely define the radius of the inscribed circle because $A=frac12Pr$, and the hypotenuse because $r=fracP2-c$. That fixes both $a+b=P-c$ and $ab=2A$ so $a$ and $b$ are also unique up to permutation, QED.






                          share|cite|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$



                          The area and the perimeter uniquely define the radius of the inscribed circle because $A=frac12Pr$, and the hypotenuse because $r=fracP2-c$. That fixes both $a+b=P-c$ and $ab=2A$ so $a$ and $b$ are also unique up to permutation, QED.







                          share|cite|improve this answer














                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer








                          edited Apr 10 at 19:52

























                          answered Apr 10 at 19:44









                          Roman OdaiskyRoman Odaisky

                          24116




                          24116





















                              2












                              $begingroup$

                              Long Comment:



                              You can at least give the simple formulae for the perimeter $P$ and area $A$ of a right angle triangle.



                              If $z^2=x^2+y^2$ is a primitive Pythagorean triangle with $x$ being the base of the triangle and $y$ being the height (due to the right angle), then $P=x+y+z$ and $A=frac12xy$



                              Then you can quote the formulae for primitive Pythagorean Triples, where $z=left(a^2+b^2right)$, $x=left(a^2-b^2right)$ and $y=2ab$



                              To expand to all the non primitive Pythagorean triangles we have



                              $$(cz)^2=(cx)^2+(cy)^2$$



                              Therefore



                              $$P=a(2a+2b)c$$
                              $$A=frac12 left(a^2-b^2right)(2ab)c^2=left(a^2-b^2right)abc^2$$



                              For two incongruent Pythagorean triangles 1 and 2 the condition is



                              $$P_1=P_2 ;;textand ;; A_1=A_2$$



                              For Perimeter:
                              $$a_1(2a_1+2b_1)c_1=a_2(2a_2+2b_2)c_2$$
                              $$fraca_2+b_2a_1+b_1=fraca_1c_1a_2c_2tag1$$
                              For Area:
                              $$left(a_1^2-b_1^2right)a_1b_1c_1^2=left(a_2^2-b_2^2right)a_2b_2c_2^2$$
                              $$fraca_2+b_2a_1+b_1=fraca_1c_1a_2c_2left(fracb_1c_1b_2c_2frac (a_1-b_1) (a_2-b_2) right)$$



                              Therefore combining both gives



                              $$b_1c_1(a_1-b_1)=b_2c_2(a_2-b_2)tag2$$



                              Update:



                              Using (1) and (2) we can eliminate the variables $c_1$ and $c_2$ eventually giving
                              $$frac (a_2+b_2) a_2 (a_1+b_1) a_1 =frac (a_2-b_2) b_2 (a_1-b_1) b_1 $$
                              or
                              $$frac (a_2+b_2) a_2 (a_2-b_2) b_2 =frac (a_1+b_1) a_1 (a_1-b_1) b_1 $$






                              share|cite|improve this answer











                              $endgroup$












                              • $begingroup$
                                In the version you use for primitive triples I think one needs $a,b$ odd and coprime, $a>b$ to give triples of positives. [That seems it would be known in that version…] I used the other version in my attempt, $p^2-q^2,2pq,p^2+q^2$ with $p,q$ coprime opposite parity and $p>q.$ Still didn't go to a finish in my attempts though.
                                $endgroup$
                                – coffeemath
                                Apr 10 at 12:37






                              • 1




                                $begingroup$
                                updated to your version
                                $endgroup$
                                – James Arathoon
                                Apr 10 at 13:10















                              2












                              $begingroup$

                              Long Comment:



                              You can at least give the simple formulae for the perimeter $P$ and area $A$ of a right angle triangle.



                              If $z^2=x^2+y^2$ is a primitive Pythagorean triangle with $x$ being the base of the triangle and $y$ being the height (due to the right angle), then $P=x+y+z$ and $A=frac12xy$



                              Then you can quote the formulae for primitive Pythagorean Triples, where $z=left(a^2+b^2right)$, $x=left(a^2-b^2right)$ and $y=2ab$



                              To expand to all the non primitive Pythagorean triangles we have



                              $$(cz)^2=(cx)^2+(cy)^2$$



                              Therefore



                              $$P=a(2a+2b)c$$
                              $$A=frac12 left(a^2-b^2right)(2ab)c^2=left(a^2-b^2right)abc^2$$



                              For two incongruent Pythagorean triangles 1 and 2 the condition is



                              $$P_1=P_2 ;;textand ;; A_1=A_2$$



                              For Perimeter:
                              $$a_1(2a_1+2b_1)c_1=a_2(2a_2+2b_2)c_2$$
                              $$fraca_2+b_2a_1+b_1=fraca_1c_1a_2c_2tag1$$
                              For Area:
                              $$left(a_1^2-b_1^2right)a_1b_1c_1^2=left(a_2^2-b_2^2right)a_2b_2c_2^2$$
                              $$fraca_2+b_2a_1+b_1=fraca_1c_1a_2c_2left(fracb_1c_1b_2c_2frac (a_1-b_1) (a_2-b_2) right)$$



                              Therefore combining both gives



                              $$b_1c_1(a_1-b_1)=b_2c_2(a_2-b_2)tag2$$



                              Update:



                              Using (1) and (2) we can eliminate the variables $c_1$ and $c_2$ eventually giving
                              $$frac (a_2+b_2) a_2 (a_1+b_1) a_1 =frac (a_2-b_2) b_2 (a_1-b_1) b_1 $$
                              or
                              $$frac (a_2+b_2) a_2 (a_2-b_2) b_2 =frac (a_1+b_1) a_1 (a_1-b_1) b_1 $$






                              share|cite|improve this answer











                              $endgroup$












                              • $begingroup$
                                In the version you use for primitive triples I think one needs $a,b$ odd and coprime, $a>b$ to give triples of positives. [That seems it would be known in that version…] I used the other version in my attempt, $p^2-q^2,2pq,p^2+q^2$ with $p,q$ coprime opposite parity and $p>q.$ Still didn't go to a finish in my attempts though.
                                $endgroup$
                                – coffeemath
                                Apr 10 at 12:37






                              • 1




                                $begingroup$
                                updated to your version
                                $endgroup$
                                – James Arathoon
                                Apr 10 at 13:10













                              2












                              2








                              2





                              $begingroup$

                              Long Comment:



                              You can at least give the simple formulae for the perimeter $P$ and area $A$ of a right angle triangle.



                              If $z^2=x^2+y^2$ is a primitive Pythagorean triangle with $x$ being the base of the triangle and $y$ being the height (due to the right angle), then $P=x+y+z$ and $A=frac12xy$



                              Then you can quote the formulae for primitive Pythagorean Triples, where $z=left(a^2+b^2right)$, $x=left(a^2-b^2right)$ and $y=2ab$



                              To expand to all the non primitive Pythagorean triangles we have



                              $$(cz)^2=(cx)^2+(cy)^2$$



                              Therefore



                              $$P=a(2a+2b)c$$
                              $$A=frac12 left(a^2-b^2right)(2ab)c^2=left(a^2-b^2right)abc^2$$



                              For two incongruent Pythagorean triangles 1 and 2 the condition is



                              $$P_1=P_2 ;;textand ;; A_1=A_2$$



                              For Perimeter:
                              $$a_1(2a_1+2b_1)c_1=a_2(2a_2+2b_2)c_2$$
                              $$fraca_2+b_2a_1+b_1=fraca_1c_1a_2c_2tag1$$
                              For Area:
                              $$left(a_1^2-b_1^2right)a_1b_1c_1^2=left(a_2^2-b_2^2right)a_2b_2c_2^2$$
                              $$fraca_2+b_2a_1+b_1=fraca_1c_1a_2c_2left(fracb_1c_1b_2c_2frac (a_1-b_1) (a_2-b_2) right)$$



                              Therefore combining both gives



                              $$b_1c_1(a_1-b_1)=b_2c_2(a_2-b_2)tag2$$



                              Update:



                              Using (1) and (2) we can eliminate the variables $c_1$ and $c_2$ eventually giving
                              $$frac (a_2+b_2) a_2 (a_1+b_1) a_1 =frac (a_2-b_2) b_2 (a_1-b_1) b_1 $$
                              or
                              $$frac (a_2+b_2) a_2 (a_2-b_2) b_2 =frac (a_1+b_1) a_1 (a_1-b_1) b_1 $$






                              share|cite|improve this answer











                              $endgroup$



                              Long Comment:



                              You can at least give the simple formulae for the perimeter $P$ and area $A$ of a right angle triangle.



                              If $z^2=x^2+y^2$ is a primitive Pythagorean triangle with $x$ being the base of the triangle and $y$ being the height (due to the right angle), then $P=x+y+z$ and $A=frac12xy$



                              Then you can quote the formulae for primitive Pythagorean Triples, where $z=left(a^2+b^2right)$, $x=left(a^2-b^2right)$ and $y=2ab$



                              To expand to all the non primitive Pythagorean triangles we have



                              $$(cz)^2=(cx)^2+(cy)^2$$



                              Therefore



                              $$P=a(2a+2b)c$$
                              $$A=frac12 left(a^2-b^2right)(2ab)c^2=left(a^2-b^2right)abc^2$$



                              For two incongruent Pythagorean triangles 1 and 2 the condition is



                              $$P_1=P_2 ;;textand ;; A_1=A_2$$



                              For Perimeter:
                              $$a_1(2a_1+2b_1)c_1=a_2(2a_2+2b_2)c_2$$
                              $$fraca_2+b_2a_1+b_1=fraca_1c_1a_2c_2tag1$$
                              For Area:
                              $$left(a_1^2-b_1^2right)a_1b_1c_1^2=left(a_2^2-b_2^2right)a_2b_2c_2^2$$
                              $$fraca_2+b_2a_1+b_1=fraca_1c_1a_2c_2left(fracb_1c_1b_2c_2frac (a_1-b_1) (a_2-b_2) right)$$



                              Therefore combining both gives



                              $$b_1c_1(a_1-b_1)=b_2c_2(a_2-b_2)tag2$$



                              Update:



                              Using (1) and (2) we can eliminate the variables $c_1$ and $c_2$ eventually giving
                              $$frac (a_2+b_2) a_2 (a_1+b_1) a_1 =frac (a_2-b_2) b_2 (a_1-b_1) b_1 $$
                              or
                              $$frac (a_2+b_2) a_2 (a_2-b_2) b_2 =frac (a_1+b_1) a_1 (a_1-b_1) b_1 $$







                              share|cite|improve this answer














                              share|cite|improve this answer



                              share|cite|improve this answer








                              edited Apr 10 at 20:07

























                              answered Apr 10 at 12:22









                              James ArathoonJames Arathoon

                              1,623423




                              1,623423











                              • $begingroup$
                                In the version you use for primitive triples I think one needs $a,b$ odd and coprime, $a>b$ to give triples of positives. [That seems it would be known in that version…] I used the other version in my attempt, $p^2-q^2,2pq,p^2+q^2$ with $p,q$ coprime opposite parity and $p>q.$ Still didn't go to a finish in my attempts though.
                                $endgroup$
                                – coffeemath
                                Apr 10 at 12:37






                              • 1




                                $begingroup$
                                updated to your version
                                $endgroup$
                                – James Arathoon
                                Apr 10 at 13:10
















                              • $begingroup$
                                In the version you use for primitive triples I think one needs $a,b$ odd and coprime, $a>b$ to give triples of positives. [That seems it would be known in that version…] I used the other version in my attempt, $p^2-q^2,2pq,p^2+q^2$ with $p,q$ coprime opposite parity and $p>q.$ Still didn't go to a finish in my attempts though.
                                $endgroup$
                                – coffeemath
                                Apr 10 at 12:37






                              • 1




                                $begingroup$
                                updated to your version
                                $endgroup$
                                – James Arathoon
                                Apr 10 at 13:10















                              $begingroup$
                              In the version you use for primitive triples I think one needs $a,b$ odd and coprime, $a>b$ to give triples of positives. [That seems it would be known in that version…] I used the other version in my attempt, $p^2-q^2,2pq,p^2+q^2$ with $p,q$ coprime opposite parity and $p>q.$ Still didn't go to a finish in my attempts though.
                              $endgroup$
                              – coffeemath
                              Apr 10 at 12:37




                              $begingroup$
                              In the version you use for primitive triples I think one needs $a,b$ odd and coprime, $a>b$ to give triples of positives. [That seems it would be known in that version…] I used the other version in my attempt, $p^2-q^2,2pq,p^2+q^2$ with $p,q$ coprime opposite parity and $p>q.$ Still didn't go to a finish in my attempts though.
                              $endgroup$
                              – coffeemath
                              Apr 10 at 12:37




                              1




                              1




                              $begingroup$
                              updated to your version
                              $endgroup$
                              – James Arathoon
                              Apr 10 at 13:10




                              $begingroup$
                              updated to your version
                              $endgroup$
                              – James Arathoon
                              Apr 10 at 13:10

















                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3182185%2fare-there-incongruent-pythagorean-triangles-with-the-same-perimeter-and-same-are%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Wikipedia:Vital articles Мазмуну Biography - Өмүр баян Philosophy and psychology - Философия жана психология Religion - Дин Social sciences - Коомдук илимдер Language and literature - Тил жана адабият Science - Илим Technology - Технология Arts and recreation - Искусство жана эс алуу History and geography - Тарых жана география Навигация менюсу

                              Bruxelas-Capital Índice Historia | Composición | Situación lingüística | Clima | Cidades irmandadas | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióneO uso das linguas en Bruxelas e a situación do neerlandés"Rexión de Bruxelas Capital"o orixinalSitio da rexiónPáxina de Bruselas no sitio da Oficina de Promoción Turística de Valonia e BruxelasMapa Interactivo da Rexión de Bruxelas-CapitaleeWorldCat332144929079854441105155190212ID28008674080552-90000 0001 0666 3698n94104302ID540940339365017018237

                              What should I write in an apology letter, since I have decided not to join a company after accepting an offer letterShould I keep looking after accepting a job offer?What should I do when I've been verbally told I would get an offer letter, but still haven't gotten one after 4 weeks?Do I accept an offer from a company that I am not likely to join?New job hasn't confirmed starting date and I want to give current employer as much notice as possibleHow should I address my manager in my resignation letter?HR delayed background verification, now jobless as resignedNo email communication after accepting a formal written offer. How should I phrase the call?What should I do if after receiving a verbal offer letter I am informed that my written job offer is put on hold due to some internal issues?Should I inform the current employer that I am about to resign within 1-2 weeks since I have signed the offer letter and waiting for visa?What company will do, if I send their offer letter to another company