Did Scotland spend $250,000 for the slogan “Welcome to Scotland”? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Are big corporations the biggest beneficiaries from farming subsidies?Did the US government spend millions of dollars to train Chinese prostitutes to drink responsibly?Does the Australian government spend more on welfare than on defense?Did the Mexican Government publish a manual for how to illegally enter the US?Is the cause for the Berkeley Boom “unknown”?Were these 'Communist Rules for Revolution' written in 1919?Did the Special Virus-Cancer Program (SVCP) exist?Did Paul Combetta ask for advice on reddit on how to strip emails for Hillary Clinton?Did the amount of bureaucrats increase in the immediate aftermath of the Soviet Union?Did 60% of polled South Africans say the country was better run during apartheid?
Multi tool use
What are the motives behind Cersei's orders given to Bronn?
What makes black pepper strong or mild?
Is it true that "carbohydrates are of no use for the basal metabolic need"?
G-Code for resetting to 100% speed
The logistics of corpse disposal
Antler Helmet: Can it work?
What is the musical term for a note that continously plays through a melody?
Is a manifold-with-boundary with given interior and non-empty boundary essentially unique?
Is there a documented rationale why the House Ways and Means chairman can demand tax info?
Is 1 ppb equal to 1 μg/kg?
Can Pao de Queijo, and similar foods, be kosher for Passover?
I need to find the potential function of a vector field.
Disable hyphenation for an entire paragraph
Why aren't air breathing engines used as small first stages
How to recreate this effect in Photoshop?
What is the correct way to use the pinch test for dehydration?
How do I stop a creek from eroding my steep embankment?
Why don't the Weasley twins use magic outside of school if the Trace can only find the location of spells cast?
How can I make names more distinctive without making them longer?
How to draw this diagram using TikZ package?
Why are there no cargo aircraft with "flying wing" design?
Storing hydrofluoric acid before the invention of plastics
3 doors, three guards, one stone
Right-skewed distribution with mean equals to mode?
Did Scotland spend $250,000 for the slogan “Welcome to Scotland”?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Are big corporations the biggest beneficiaries from farming subsidies?Did the US government spend millions of dollars to train Chinese prostitutes to drink responsibly?Does the Australian government spend more on welfare than on defense?Did the Mexican Government publish a manual for how to illegally enter the US?Is the cause for the Berkeley Boom “unknown”?Were these 'Communist Rules for Revolution' written in 1919?Did the Special Virus-Cancer Program (SVCP) exist?Did Paul Combetta ask for advice on reddit on how to strip emails for Hillary Clinton?Did the amount of bureaucrats increase in the immediate aftermath of the Soviet Union?Did 60% of polled South Africans say the country was better run during apartheid?
A 2007 Digital Journal article claims
Scotland spent six months of research and $250,000 to create a new slogan to boost tourism. What did they come up with? “Welcome to Scotland” is the new slogan, as the country has abandoned the previous “the best small country in the world” slogan
Is this true? Did all of the money really go into creating this one single line or does it include the costs of changing every facility to have that slogan?
government scotland
edited Apr 10 at 14:50
Oddthinking♦
102k31427531
asked Apr 10 at 10:43
MaximMaxim
7632715
add a comment |
A 2007 Digital Journal article claims
Scotland spent six months of research and $250,000 to create a new slogan to boost tourism. What did they come up with? “Welcome to Scotland” is the new slogan, as the country has abandoned the previous “the best small country in the world” slogan
Is this true? Did all of the money really go into creating this one single line or does it include the costs of changing every facility to have that slogan?
government scotland
edited Apr 10 at 14:50
Oddthinking♦
102k31427531
asked Apr 10 at 10:43
MaximMaxim
7632715
1
The linked article does not even claim that the 250,000 were spent entirely on the slogan. But they are quite vague about it. Quality journalism, eh?
– Alexander Kosubek
Apr 11 at 6:03
add a comment |
A 2007 Digital Journal article claims
Scotland spent six months of research and $250,000 to create a new slogan to boost tourism. What did they come up with? “Welcome to Scotland” is the new slogan, as the country has abandoned the previous “the best small country in the world” slogan
Is this true? Did all of the money really go into creating this one single line or does it include the costs of changing every facility to have that slogan?
government scotland
edited Apr 10 at 14:50
Oddthinking♦
102k31427531
asked Apr 10 at 10:43
MaximMaxim
7632715
A 2007 Digital Journal article claims
Scotland spent six months of research and $250,000 to create a new slogan to boost tourism. What did they come up with? “Welcome to Scotland” is the new slogan, as the country has abandoned the previous “the best small country in the world” slogan
Is this true? Did all of the money really go into creating this one single line or does it include the costs of changing every facility to have that slogan?
government scotland
government scotland
edited Apr 10 at 14:50
Oddthinking♦
102k31427531
asked Apr 10 at 10:43
MaximMaxim
7632715
edited Apr 10 at 14:50
Oddthinking♦
102k31427531
asked Apr 10 at 10:43
MaximMaxim
7632715
edited Apr 10 at 14:50
Oddthinking♦
102k31427531
edited Apr 10 at 14:50
Oddthinking♦
102k31427531
edited Apr 10 at 14:50
Oddthinking♦
102k31427531
102k31427531
asked Apr 10 at 10:43
MaximMaxim
7632715
asked Apr 10 at 10:43
MaximMaxim
7632715
asked Apr 10 at 10:43
MaximMaxim
7632715
7632715
1
The linked article does not even claim that the 250,000 were spent entirely on the slogan. But they are quite vague about it. Quality journalism, eh?
– Alexander Kosubek
Apr 11 at 6:03
add a comment |
1
The linked article does not even claim that the 250,000 were spent entirely on the slogan. But they are quite vague about it. Quality journalism, eh?
– Alexander Kosubek
Apr 11 at 6:03
1
1
The linked article does not even claim that the 250,000 were spent entirely on the slogan. But they are quite vague about it. Quality journalism, eh?
– Alexander Kosubek
Apr 11 at 6:03
The linked article does not even claim that the 250,000 were spent entirely on the slogan. But they are quite vague about it. Quality journalism, eh?
– Alexander Kosubek
Apr 11 at 6:03
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
No, but on the signs
They did spend $250,000, but that included making and installing new signs for the airports.
The original article at earthtimes.org (archived) claims:
GLASGOW, Scotland, Nov. 28 Scotland has replaced its airport signs proclaiming the country to be "the best small country in the world" with a new slogan: "Welcome to Scotland."
The new slogan, which was revealed Tuesday after six months of development and $250,000 spent on the project, is also printed on the posters in Gaelic as "Failte gu Alba," The Times of London reported Wednesday.
Confusingly it is tagged with US World News even though earthtimes.org is a British website.
According to articles from BBC, the Scottish Daily Record, and The Times from 2007, they spent £125,000 on the change. Thanks to a strong pound or a weak dollar, this was worth 258,900 USD in November 2007.
Note that this only covers the signs at the airports:
A government spokesman said the £125,000 cost of the displays covered the new artwork, printing and installation.
The same article also defends the cost as simply part of the normal budget, included in the long term planning:
The cash came from existing budgets as the Best Small Country campaign was due to come to an end.
answered Apr 10 at 12:28
pipepipe
648610
New contributor
pipe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
2
It's unclear from you citations whether the slogan itself cost $250,000 / $125,000 or whether that was the cost of inventing the slogan and changing all the facilities.
– Daron
Apr 10 at 16:22
60
"A government spokesman said the £125,000 cost of the displays covered the new artwork, printing and installation." So the answer to the original question should be "No," they didn't spend £125000 JUST coming up with the slogan.
– Paul O.
Apr 10 at 16:23
2
I would just omit a "yes" or "no" answer and instead just focus on how the money was spent. Let the reader decide whether the claim is accurate or not, in their view.
– jpmc26
Apr 10 at 23:24
9
"pipe is a new contributor." ... Welcome to Skeptics! ... a community where we can make a slogan for free!
– Cœur
Apr 11 at 6:48
13
@Cœur Actually I prefer the old slogan, The Best Small User in the World.
– pipe
Apr 11 at 8:54
|
show 5 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
No, but on the signs
They did spend $250,000, but that included making and installing new signs for the airports.
The original article at earthtimes.org (archived) claims:
GLASGOW, Scotland, Nov. 28 Scotland has replaced its airport signs proclaiming the country to be "the best small country in the world" with a new slogan: "Welcome to Scotland."
The new slogan, which was revealed Tuesday after six months of development and $250,000 spent on the project, is also printed on the posters in Gaelic as "Failte gu Alba," The Times of London reported Wednesday.
Confusingly it is tagged with US World News even though earthtimes.org is a British website.
According to articles from BBC, the Scottish Daily Record, and The Times from 2007, they spent £125,000 on the change. Thanks to a strong pound or a weak dollar, this was worth 258,900 USD in November 2007.
Note that this only covers the signs at the airports:
A government spokesman said the £125,000 cost of the displays covered the new artwork, printing and installation.
The same article also defends the cost as simply part of the normal budget, included in the long term planning:
The cash came from existing budgets as the Best Small Country campaign was due to come to an end.
answered Apr 10 at 12:28
pipepipe
648610
New contributor
pipe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
2
It's unclear from you citations whether the slogan itself cost $250,000 / $125,000 or whether that was the cost of inventing the slogan and changing all the facilities.
– Daron
Apr 10 at 16:22
60
"A government spokesman said the £125,000 cost of the displays covered the new artwork, printing and installation." So the answer to the original question should be "No," they didn't spend £125000 JUST coming up with the slogan.
– Paul O.
Apr 10 at 16:23
2
I would just omit a "yes" or "no" answer and instead just focus on how the money was spent. Let the reader decide whether the claim is accurate or not, in their view.
– jpmc26
Apr 10 at 23:24
9
"pipe is a new contributor." ... Welcome to Skeptics! ... a community where we can make a slogan for free!
– Cœur
Apr 11 at 6:48
13
@Cœur Actually I prefer the old slogan, The Best Small User in the World.
– pipe
Apr 11 at 8:54
|
show 5 more comments
No, but on the signs
They did spend $250,000, but that included making and installing new signs for the airports.
The original article at earthtimes.org (archived) claims:
GLASGOW, Scotland, Nov. 28 Scotland has replaced its airport signs proclaiming the country to be "the best small country in the world" with a new slogan: "Welcome to Scotland."
The new slogan, which was revealed Tuesday after six months of development and $250,000 spent on the project, is also printed on the posters in Gaelic as "Failte gu Alba," The Times of London reported Wednesday.
Confusingly it is tagged with US World News even though earthtimes.org is a British website.
According to articles from BBC, the Scottish Daily Record, and The Times from 2007, they spent £125,000 on the change. Thanks to a strong pound or a weak dollar, this was worth 258,900 USD in November 2007.
Note that this only covers the signs at the airports:
A government spokesman said the £125,000 cost of the displays covered the new artwork, printing and installation.
The same article also defends the cost as simply part of the normal budget, included in the long term planning:
The cash came from existing budgets as the Best Small Country campaign was due to come to an end.
answered Apr 10 at 12:28
pipepipe
648610
New contributor
pipe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
2
It's unclear from you citations whether the slogan itself cost $250,000 / $125,000 or whether that was the cost of inventing the slogan and changing all the facilities.
– Daron
Apr 10 at 16:22
60
"A government spokesman said the £125,000 cost of the displays covered the new artwork, printing and installation." So the answer to the original question should be "No," they didn't spend £125000 JUST coming up with the slogan.
– Paul O.
Apr 10 at 16:23
2
I would just omit a "yes" or "no" answer and instead just focus on how the money was spent. Let the reader decide whether the claim is accurate or not, in their view.
– jpmc26
Apr 10 at 23:24
9
"pipe is a new contributor." ... Welcome to Skeptics! ... a community where we can make a slogan for free!
– Cœur
Apr 11 at 6:48
13
@Cœur Actually I prefer the old slogan, The Best Small User in the World.
– pipe
Apr 11 at 8:54
|
show 5 more comments
No, but on the signs
They did spend $250,000, but that included making and installing new signs for the airports.
The original article at earthtimes.org (archived) claims:
GLASGOW, Scotland, Nov. 28 Scotland has replaced its airport signs proclaiming the country to be "the best small country in the world" with a new slogan: "Welcome to Scotland."
The new slogan, which was revealed Tuesday after six months of development and $250,000 spent on the project, is also printed on the posters in Gaelic as "Failte gu Alba," The Times of London reported Wednesday.
Confusingly it is tagged with US World News even though earthtimes.org is a British website.
According to articles from BBC, the Scottish Daily Record, and The Times from 2007, they spent £125,000 on the change. Thanks to a strong pound or a weak dollar, this was worth 258,900 USD in November 2007.
Note that this only covers the signs at the airports:
A government spokesman said the £125,000 cost of the displays covered the new artwork, printing and installation.
The same article also defends the cost as simply part of the normal budget, included in the long term planning:
The cash came from existing budgets as the Best Small Country campaign was due to come to an end.
answered Apr 10 at 12:28
pipepipe
648610
New contributor
pipe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
No, but on the signs
They did spend $250,000, but that included making and installing new signs for the airports.
The original article at earthtimes.org (archived) claims:
GLASGOW, Scotland, Nov. 28 Scotland has replaced its airport signs proclaiming the country to be "the best small country in the world" with a new slogan: "Welcome to Scotland."
The new slogan, which was revealed Tuesday after six months of development and $250,000 spent on the project, is also printed on the posters in Gaelic as "Failte gu Alba," The Times of London reported Wednesday.
Confusingly it is tagged with US World News even though earthtimes.org is a British website.
According to articles from BBC, the Scottish Daily Record, and The Times from 2007, they spent £125,000 on the change. Thanks to a strong pound or a weak dollar, this was worth 258,900 USD in November 2007.
Note that this only covers the signs at the airports:
A government spokesman said the £125,000 cost of the displays covered the new artwork, printing and installation.
The same article also defends the cost as simply part of the normal budget, included in the long term planning:
The cash came from existing budgets as the Best Small Country campaign was due to come to an end.
answered Apr 10 at 12:28
pipepipe
648610
New contributor
pipe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited Apr 10 at 17:38
answered Apr 10 at 12:28
pipepipe
648610
New contributor
pipe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered Apr 10 at 12:28
pipepipe
648610
answered Apr 10 at 12:28
pipepipe
648610
648610
New contributor
pipe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
pipe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
pipe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
2
It's unclear from you citations whether the slogan itself cost $250,000 / $125,000 or whether that was the cost of inventing the slogan and changing all the facilities.
– Daron
Apr 10 at 16:22
60
"A government spokesman said the £125,000 cost of the displays covered the new artwork, printing and installation." So the answer to the original question should be "No," they didn't spend £125000 JUST coming up with the slogan.
– Paul O.
Apr 10 at 16:23
2
I would just omit a "yes" or "no" answer and instead just focus on how the money was spent. Let the reader decide whether the claim is accurate or not, in their view.
– jpmc26
Apr 10 at 23:24
9
"pipe is a new contributor." ... Welcome to Skeptics! ... a community where we can make a slogan for free!
– Cœur
Apr 11 at 6:48
13
@Cœur Actually I prefer the old slogan, The Best Small User in the World.
– pipe
Apr 11 at 8:54
|
show 5 more comments
2
It's unclear from you citations whether the slogan itself cost $250,000 / $125,000 or whether that was the cost of inventing the slogan and changing all the facilities.
– Daron
Apr 10 at 16:22
60
"A government spokesman said the £125,000 cost of the displays covered the new artwork, printing and installation." So the answer to the original question should be "No," they didn't spend £125000 JUST coming up with the slogan.
– Paul O.
Apr 10 at 16:23
2
I would just omit a "yes" or "no" answer and instead just focus on how the money was spent. Let the reader decide whether the claim is accurate or not, in their view.
– jpmc26
Apr 10 at 23:24
9
"pipe is a new contributor." ... Welcome to Skeptics! ... a community where we can make a slogan for free!
– Cœur
Apr 11 at 6:48
13
@Cœur Actually I prefer the old slogan, The Best Small User in the World.
– pipe
Apr 11 at 8:54
2
2
It's unclear from you citations whether the slogan itself cost $250,000 / $125,000 or whether that was the cost of inventing the slogan and changing all the facilities.
– Daron
Apr 10 at 16:22
It's unclear from you citations whether the slogan itself cost $250,000 / $125,000 or whether that was the cost of inventing the slogan and changing all the facilities.
– Daron
Apr 10 at 16:22
60
60
"A government spokesman said the £125,000 cost of the displays covered the new artwork, printing and installation." So the answer to the original question should be "No," they didn't spend £125000 JUST coming up with the slogan.
– Paul O.
Apr 10 at 16:23
"A government spokesman said the £125,000 cost of the displays covered the new artwork, printing and installation." So the answer to the original question should be "No," they didn't spend £125000 JUST coming up with the slogan.
– Paul O.
Apr 10 at 16:23
2
2
I would just omit a "yes" or "no" answer and instead just focus on how the money was spent. Let the reader decide whether the claim is accurate or not, in their view.
– jpmc26
Apr 10 at 23:24
I would just omit a "yes" or "no" answer and instead just focus on how the money was spent. Let the reader decide whether the claim is accurate or not, in their view.
– jpmc26
Apr 10 at 23:24
9
9
"pipe is a new contributor." ... Welcome to Skeptics! ... a community where we can make a slogan for free!
– Cœur
Apr 11 at 6:48
"pipe is a new contributor." ... Welcome to Skeptics! ... a community where we can make a slogan for free!
– Cœur
Apr 11 at 6:48
13
13
@Cœur Actually I prefer the old slogan, The Best Small User in the World.
– pipe
Apr 11 at 8:54
@Cœur Actually I prefer the old slogan, The Best Small User in the World.
– pipe
Apr 11 at 8:54
|
show 5 more comments
HoZnGakMS8 4VOz75KYMsxxky9xcCfP6nE5zWJSDtI WhJI4Mhn OyoFZY bk2uZ1HQ n0xLy,n1qzf
1
The linked article does not even claim that the 250,000 were spent entirely on the slogan. But they are quite vague about it. Quality journalism, eh?
– Alexander Kosubek
Apr 11 at 6:03