How does a Swashbuckler rogue “fight with two weapons while safely darting away”?What does Assassinate mean by “surprised”, and can it be used multiple times?Does uncanny dodge prevent ranged sneak attacks?Optimal martial ranged non-human level 15 build for DPR/SurvivalMelee with AOE-impacted enemyHow can I make Westley from The Princess Bride in D&D 5e?Does a wizard really have the same chance to hit as a fighter?Should the Swashbuckler Fancy Footwork ability apply to my Crossbow Master rogue in melee range?Is allowing PCs to take a “zeroth level” in a class seriously unbalanced or not?How to build a rogue unchained to be able to fight with 2 blade boots and 2 daggers?How can I have a shield and a way of attacking at distance at the same time?
A♭ major 9th chord in Bach is unexpectedly dissonant/jazzy
What is the meaning of "matter" in physics?
Explaining intravenous drug abuse to a small child
What does the copyright in a dissertation protect exactly?
Range hood vents into crawl space
Gift for mentor after his thesis defense?
How to increase speed on my hybrid bike with flat handlebars and 700X35C tyres?
If quadruped mammals evolve to become bipedal will their breast or nipple change position?
Was there a dinosaur-counter in the original Jurassic Park movie?
Can you just subtract the challenge rating of friendly NPCs?
Did Ham the Chimp follow commands, or did he just randomly push levers?
What's weird about Proto-Indo-European Stops?
My C Drive is full without reason
Test whether a string is in a list with variable
HTML folder located within IOS Image file?
Translation of "invincible independence"
Is there a reason why Turkey took the Balkan territories of the Ottoman Empire, instead of Greece or another of the Balkan states?
Why can’t you see at the start of the Big Bang?
Select list elements based on other list
Why is the blank symbol not considered part of the input alphabet of a Turing machine?
Why were the rules for Proliferate changed?
Searching for a sentence that I only know part of it using Google's operators
While drilling into kitchen wall, hit a wire - any advice?
Why is the episode called "The Last of the Starks"?
How does a Swashbuckler rogue “fight with two weapons while safely darting away”?
What does Assassinate mean by “surprised”, and can it be used multiple times?Does uncanny dodge prevent ranged sneak attacks?Optimal martial ranged non-human level 15 build for DPR/SurvivalMelee with AOE-impacted enemyHow can I make Westley from The Princess Bride in D&D 5e?Does a wizard really have the same chance to hit as a fighter?Should the Swashbuckler Fancy Footwork ability apply to my Crossbow Master rogue in melee range?Is allowing PCs to take a “zeroth level” in a class seriously unbalanced or not?How to build a rogue unchained to be able to fight with 2 blade boots and 2 daggers?How can I have a shield and a way of attacking at distance at the same time?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
The description for the Swashbuckler rogue (SCAG, p. 135; XGtE, p. 47) says:
A Swashbuckler excels in single combat, and can fight with two weapons while safely darting away from an opponent.
How? The sentence does not seem to relate to any specific mechanics.
dnd-5e rogue archetype
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The description for the Swashbuckler rogue (SCAG, p. 135; XGtE, p. 47) says:
A Swashbuckler excels in single combat, and can fight with two weapons while safely darting away from an opponent.
How? The sentence does not seem to relate to any specific mechanics.
dnd-5e rogue archetype
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The description for the Swashbuckler rogue (SCAG, p. 135; XGtE, p. 47) says:
A Swashbuckler excels in single combat, and can fight with two weapons while safely darting away from an opponent.
How? The sentence does not seem to relate to any specific mechanics.
dnd-5e rogue archetype
$endgroup$
The description for the Swashbuckler rogue (SCAG, p. 135; XGtE, p. 47) says:
A Swashbuckler excels in single combat, and can fight with two weapons while safely darting away from an opponent.
How? The sentence does not seem to relate to any specific mechanics.
dnd-5e rogue archetype
dnd-5e rogue archetype
edited Apr 28 at 21:52
V2Blast
28.9k5103175
28.9k5103175
asked Apr 28 at 16:08
JackJack
10.8k442101
10.8k442101
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The next paragraph reads
When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn
how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal.
During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
creature, that creature can't make opportunity attacks
against you for the rest of your turn. -SCAG pg. 135
It further goes on to clarify in a blurb on the next page
This allows you to use your bonus action to
fight with two weapons, and then safely evade each foe
you attacked. -SCAG pg. 136
So while holding two weapons, if you are surrounded you can make two attacks against up to two different creatures and get away unharmed. It doesn't specifically state that it needs to hit, just that the attack be made.
$endgroup$
6
$begingroup$
Do note that the Swashbuckler also appears in XGtE, where the further explanatory blurb is not included.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
Apr 28 at 16:18
3
$begingroup$
This is why I specifically cited which book I was referencing
$endgroup$
– Seidr
Apr 28 at 16:26
2
$begingroup$
This exactly explains my puzzlement. I had surmised that the point was that a swashbuckler could use their bonus action to attack, then use fancy footwork, but it seemed strange that it was not spelled out. My DDB online reference lacks the blurb you mention in the subtype description, although it is in in the online version of SCAG. Perfect answer, thank you.
$endgroup$
– Jack
Apr 28 at 16:29
3
$begingroup$
@Seidr sure. I'm just calling it out explicitly as that provides context to readers as to why this may not have been obvious to the OP.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
Apr 28 at 18:25
$begingroup$
@Carcer I appreciate that. In fact, had I seen that blurb I wouldn't have had the question. I would delete it as useless except others might look at XGtE or some other reference (such as the DDB one), and make the same mistake. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Jack
Apr 28 at 20:10
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
This is probably a reference to the Swashbuckler's Fancy Footwork feature:
When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal. During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
creature, that creature can’t make opportunity attacks against you for the rest of your turn.
A non-swashbuckler rogue who wants to make a hit-and-run attack without provoking opportunity attacks has to use their bonus action to Disengage, but a Swashbuckler Rogue doesn't need to use their bonus action (since the target of their attack cannot make OAs against them, whether the Swashbuckler hits or not) and so they retain the use of their bonus action and can use it to two-weapon fight.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
This explains it so much better than the accepted answer
$endgroup$
– András
Apr 29 at 7:36
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f147061%2fhow-does-a-swashbuckler-rogue-fight-with-two-weapons-while-safely-darting-away%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The next paragraph reads
When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn
how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal.
During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
creature, that creature can't make opportunity attacks
against you for the rest of your turn. -SCAG pg. 135
It further goes on to clarify in a blurb on the next page
This allows you to use your bonus action to
fight with two weapons, and then safely evade each foe
you attacked. -SCAG pg. 136
So while holding two weapons, if you are surrounded you can make two attacks against up to two different creatures and get away unharmed. It doesn't specifically state that it needs to hit, just that the attack be made.
$endgroup$
6
$begingroup$
Do note that the Swashbuckler also appears in XGtE, where the further explanatory blurb is not included.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
Apr 28 at 16:18
3
$begingroup$
This is why I specifically cited which book I was referencing
$endgroup$
– Seidr
Apr 28 at 16:26
2
$begingroup$
This exactly explains my puzzlement. I had surmised that the point was that a swashbuckler could use their bonus action to attack, then use fancy footwork, but it seemed strange that it was not spelled out. My DDB online reference lacks the blurb you mention in the subtype description, although it is in in the online version of SCAG. Perfect answer, thank you.
$endgroup$
– Jack
Apr 28 at 16:29
3
$begingroup$
@Seidr sure. I'm just calling it out explicitly as that provides context to readers as to why this may not have been obvious to the OP.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
Apr 28 at 18:25
$begingroup$
@Carcer I appreciate that. In fact, had I seen that blurb I wouldn't have had the question. I would delete it as useless except others might look at XGtE or some other reference (such as the DDB one), and make the same mistake. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Jack
Apr 28 at 20:10
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
The next paragraph reads
When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn
how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal.
During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
creature, that creature can't make opportunity attacks
against you for the rest of your turn. -SCAG pg. 135
It further goes on to clarify in a blurb on the next page
This allows you to use your bonus action to
fight with two weapons, and then safely evade each foe
you attacked. -SCAG pg. 136
So while holding two weapons, if you are surrounded you can make two attacks against up to two different creatures and get away unharmed. It doesn't specifically state that it needs to hit, just that the attack be made.
$endgroup$
6
$begingroup$
Do note that the Swashbuckler also appears in XGtE, where the further explanatory blurb is not included.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
Apr 28 at 16:18
3
$begingroup$
This is why I specifically cited which book I was referencing
$endgroup$
– Seidr
Apr 28 at 16:26
2
$begingroup$
This exactly explains my puzzlement. I had surmised that the point was that a swashbuckler could use their bonus action to attack, then use fancy footwork, but it seemed strange that it was not spelled out. My DDB online reference lacks the blurb you mention in the subtype description, although it is in in the online version of SCAG. Perfect answer, thank you.
$endgroup$
– Jack
Apr 28 at 16:29
3
$begingroup$
@Seidr sure. I'm just calling it out explicitly as that provides context to readers as to why this may not have been obvious to the OP.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
Apr 28 at 18:25
$begingroup$
@Carcer I appreciate that. In fact, had I seen that blurb I wouldn't have had the question. I would delete it as useless except others might look at XGtE or some other reference (such as the DDB one), and make the same mistake. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Jack
Apr 28 at 20:10
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
The next paragraph reads
When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn
how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal.
During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
creature, that creature can't make opportunity attacks
against you for the rest of your turn. -SCAG pg. 135
It further goes on to clarify in a blurb on the next page
This allows you to use your bonus action to
fight with two weapons, and then safely evade each foe
you attacked. -SCAG pg. 136
So while holding two weapons, if you are surrounded you can make two attacks against up to two different creatures and get away unharmed. It doesn't specifically state that it needs to hit, just that the attack be made.
$endgroup$
The next paragraph reads
When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn
how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal.
During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
creature, that creature can't make opportunity attacks
against you for the rest of your turn. -SCAG pg. 135
It further goes on to clarify in a blurb on the next page
This allows you to use your bonus action to
fight with two weapons, and then safely evade each foe
you attacked. -SCAG pg. 136
So while holding two weapons, if you are surrounded you can make two attacks against up to two different creatures and get away unharmed. It doesn't specifically state that it needs to hit, just that the attack be made.
answered Apr 28 at 16:14
SeidrSeidr
787616
787616
6
$begingroup$
Do note that the Swashbuckler also appears in XGtE, where the further explanatory blurb is not included.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
Apr 28 at 16:18
3
$begingroup$
This is why I specifically cited which book I was referencing
$endgroup$
– Seidr
Apr 28 at 16:26
2
$begingroup$
This exactly explains my puzzlement. I had surmised that the point was that a swashbuckler could use their bonus action to attack, then use fancy footwork, but it seemed strange that it was not spelled out. My DDB online reference lacks the blurb you mention in the subtype description, although it is in in the online version of SCAG. Perfect answer, thank you.
$endgroup$
– Jack
Apr 28 at 16:29
3
$begingroup$
@Seidr sure. I'm just calling it out explicitly as that provides context to readers as to why this may not have been obvious to the OP.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
Apr 28 at 18:25
$begingroup$
@Carcer I appreciate that. In fact, had I seen that blurb I wouldn't have had the question. I would delete it as useless except others might look at XGtE or some other reference (such as the DDB one), and make the same mistake. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Jack
Apr 28 at 20:10
|
show 1 more comment
6
$begingroup$
Do note that the Swashbuckler also appears in XGtE, where the further explanatory blurb is not included.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
Apr 28 at 16:18
3
$begingroup$
This is why I specifically cited which book I was referencing
$endgroup$
– Seidr
Apr 28 at 16:26
2
$begingroup$
This exactly explains my puzzlement. I had surmised that the point was that a swashbuckler could use their bonus action to attack, then use fancy footwork, but it seemed strange that it was not spelled out. My DDB online reference lacks the blurb you mention in the subtype description, although it is in in the online version of SCAG. Perfect answer, thank you.
$endgroup$
– Jack
Apr 28 at 16:29
3
$begingroup$
@Seidr sure. I'm just calling it out explicitly as that provides context to readers as to why this may not have been obvious to the OP.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
Apr 28 at 18:25
$begingroup$
@Carcer I appreciate that. In fact, had I seen that blurb I wouldn't have had the question. I would delete it as useless except others might look at XGtE or some other reference (such as the DDB one), and make the same mistake. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Jack
Apr 28 at 20:10
6
6
$begingroup$
Do note that the Swashbuckler also appears in XGtE, where the further explanatory blurb is not included.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
Apr 28 at 16:18
$begingroup$
Do note that the Swashbuckler also appears in XGtE, where the further explanatory blurb is not included.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
Apr 28 at 16:18
3
3
$begingroup$
This is why I specifically cited which book I was referencing
$endgroup$
– Seidr
Apr 28 at 16:26
$begingroup$
This is why I specifically cited which book I was referencing
$endgroup$
– Seidr
Apr 28 at 16:26
2
2
$begingroup$
This exactly explains my puzzlement. I had surmised that the point was that a swashbuckler could use their bonus action to attack, then use fancy footwork, but it seemed strange that it was not spelled out. My DDB online reference lacks the blurb you mention in the subtype description, although it is in in the online version of SCAG. Perfect answer, thank you.
$endgroup$
– Jack
Apr 28 at 16:29
$begingroup$
This exactly explains my puzzlement. I had surmised that the point was that a swashbuckler could use their bonus action to attack, then use fancy footwork, but it seemed strange that it was not spelled out. My DDB online reference lacks the blurb you mention in the subtype description, although it is in in the online version of SCAG. Perfect answer, thank you.
$endgroup$
– Jack
Apr 28 at 16:29
3
3
$begingroup$
@Seidr sure. I'm just calling it out explicitly as that provides context to readers as to why this may not have been obvious to the OP.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
Apr 28 at 18:25
$begingroup$
@Seidr sure. I'm just calling it out explicitly as that provides context to readers as to why this may not have been obvious to the OP.
$endgroup$
– Carcer
Apr 28 at 18:25
$begingroup$
@Carcer I appreciate that. In fact, had I seen that blurb I wouldn't have had the question. I would delete it as useless except others might look at XGtE or some other reference (such as the DDB one), and make the same mistake. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Jack
Apr 28 at 20:10
$begingroup$
@Carcer I appreciate that. In fact, had I seen that blurb I wouldn't have had the question. I would delete it as useless except others might look at XGtE or some other reference (such as the DDB one), and make the same mistake. Thank you.
$endgroup$
– Jack
Apr 28 at 20:10
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
This is probably a reference to the Swashbuckler's Fancy Footwork feature:
When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal. During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
creature, that creature can’t make opportunity attacks against you for the rest of your turn.
A non-swashbuckler rogue who wants to make a hit-and-run attack without provoking opportunity attacks has to use their bonus action to Disengage, but a Swashbuckler Rogue doesn't need to use their bonus action (since the target of their attack cannot make OAs against them, whether the Swashbuckler hits or not) and so they retain the use of their bonus action and can use it to two-weapon fight.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
This explains it so much better than the accepted answer
$endgroup$
– András
Apr 29 at 7:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is probably a reference to the Swashbuckler's Fancy Footwork feature:
When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal. During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
creature, that creature can’t make opportunity attacks against you for the rest of your turn.
A non-swashbuckler rogue who wants to make a hit-and-run attack without provoking opportunity attacks has to use their bonus action to Disengage, but a Swashbuckler Rogue doesn't need to use their bonus action (since the target of their attack cannot make OAs against them, whether the Swashbuckler hits or not) and so they retain the use of their bonus action and can use it to two-weapon fight.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
This explains it so much better than the accepted answer
$endgroup$
– András
Apr 29 at 7:36
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is probably a reference to the Swashbuckler's Fancy Footwork feature:
When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal. During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
creature, that creature can’t make opportunity attacks against you for the rest of your turn.
A non-swashbuckler rogue who wants to make a hit-and-run attack without provoking opportunity attacks has to use their bonus action to Disengage, but a Swashbuckler Rogue doesn't need to use their bonus action (since the target of their attack cannot make OAs against them, whether the Swashbuckler hits or not) and so they retain the use of their bonus action and can use it to two-weapon fight.
$endgroup$
This is probably a reference to the Swashbuckler's Fancy Footwork feature:
When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal. During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
creature, that creature can’t make opportunity attacks against you for the rest of your turn.
A non-swashbuckler rogue who wants to make a hit-and-run attack without provoking opportunity attacks has to use their bonus action to Disengage, but a Swashbuckler Rogue doesn't need to use their bonus action (since the target of their attack cannot make OAs against them, whether the Swashbuckler hits or not) and so they retain the use of their bonus action and can use it to two-weapon fight.
answered Apr 28 at 16:15
CarcerCarcer
27.7k583146
27.7k583146
1
$begingroup$
This explains it so much better than the accepted answer
$endgroup$
– András
Apr 29 at 7:36
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
This explains it so much better than the accepted answer
$endgroup$
– András
Apr 29 at 7:36
1
1
$begingroup$
This explains it so much better than the accepted answer
$endgroup$
– András
Apr 29 at 7:36
$begingroup$
This explains it so much better than the accepted answer
$endgroup$
– András
Apr 29 at 7:36
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f147061%2fhow-does-a-swashbuckler-rogue-fight-with-two-weapons-while-safely-darting-away%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown