How does a Swashbuckler rogue “fight with two weapons while safely darting away”?What does Assassinate mean by “surprised”, and can it be used multiple times?Does uncanny dodge prevent ranged sneak attacks?Optimal martial ranged non-human level 15 build for DPR/SurvivalMelee with AOE-impacted enemyHow can I make Westley from The Princess Bride in D&D 5e?Does a wizard really have the same chance to hit as a fighter?Should the Swashbuckler Fancy Footwork ability apply to my Crossbow Master rogue in melee range?Is allowing PCs to take a “zeroth level” in a class seriously unbalanced or not?How to build a rogue unchained to be able to fight with 2 blade boots and 2 daggers?How can I have a shield and a way of attacking at distance at the same time?

A♭ major 9th chord in Bach is unexpectedly dissonant/jazzy

What is the meaning of "matter" in physics?

Explaining intravenous drug abuse to a small child

What does the copyright in a dissertation protect exactly?

Range hood vents into crawl space

Gift for mentor after his thesis defense?

How to increase speed on my hybrid bike with flat handlebars and 700X35C tyres?

If quadruped mammals evolve to become bipedal will their breast or nipple change position?

Was there a dinosaur-counter in the original Jurassic Park movie?

Can you just subtract the challenge rating of friendly NPCs?

Did Ham the Chimp follow commands, or did he just randomly push levers?

What's weird about Proto-Indo-European Stops?

My C Drive is full without reason

Test whether a string is in a list with variable

HTML folder located within IOS Image file?

Translation of "invincible independence"

Is there a reason why Turkey took the Balkan territories of the Ottoman Empire, instead of Greece or another of the Balkan states?

Why can’t you see at the start of the Big Bang?

Select list elements based on other list

Why is the blank symbol not considered part of the input alphabet of a Turing machine?

Why were the rules for Proliferate changed?

Searching for a sentence that I only know part of it using Google's operators

While drilling into kitchen wall, hit a wire - any advice?

Why is the episode called "The Last of the Starks"?



How does a Swashbuckler rogue “fight with two weapons while safely darting away”?


What does Assassinate mean by “surprised”, and can it be used multiple times?Does uncanny dodge prevent ranged sneak attacks?Optimal martial ranged non-human level 15 build for DPR/SurvivalMelee with AOE-impacted enemyHow can I make Westley from The Princess Bride in D&D 5e?Does a wizard really have the same chance to hit as a fighter?Should the Swashbuckler Fancy Footwork ability apply to my Crossbow Master rogue in melee range?Is allowing PCs to take a “zeroth level” in a class seriously unbalanced or not?How to build a rogue unchained to be able to fight with 2 blade boots and 2 daggers?How can I have a shield and a way of attacking at distance at the same time?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








17












$begingroup$


The description for the Swashbuckler rogue (SCAG, p. 135; XGtE, p. 47) says:




A Swashbuckler excels in single combat, and can fight with two weapons while safely darting away from an opponent.




How? The sentence does not seem to relate to any specific mechanics.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$


















    17












    $begingroup$


    The description for the Swashbuckler rogue (SCAG, p. 135; XGtE, p. 47) says:




    A Swashbuckler excels in single combat, and can fight with two weapons while safely darting away from an opponent.




    How? The sentence does not seem to relate to any specific mechanics.










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      17












      17








      17


      1



      $begingroup$


      The description for the Swashbuckler rogue (SCAG, p. 135; XGtE, p. 47) says:




      A Swashbuckler excels in single combat, and can fight with two weapons while safely darting away from an opponent.




      How? The sentence does not seem to relate to any specific mechanics.










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      The description for the Swashbuckler rogue (SCAG, p. 135; XGtE, p. 47) says:




      A Swashbuckler excels in single combat, and can fight with two weapons while safely darting away from an opponent.




      How? The sentence does not seem to relate to any specific mechanics.







      dnd-5e rogue archetype






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Apr 28 at 21:52









      V2Blast

      28.9k5103175




      28.9k5103175










      asked Apr 28 at 16:08









      JackJack

      10.8k442101




      10.8k442101




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          40












          $begingroup$

          The next paragraph reads




          When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn
          how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal.
          During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
          creature, that creature can't make opportunity attacks
          against you for the rest of your turn. -SCAG pg. 135




          It further goes on to clarify in a blurb on the next page




          This allows you to use your bonus action to
          fight with two weapons, and then safely evade each foe
          you attacked. -SCAG pg. 136




          So while holding two weapons, if you are surrounded you can make two attacks against up to two different creatures and get away unharmed. It doesn't specifically state that it needs to hit, just that the attack be made.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$








          • 6




            $begingroup$
            Do note that the Swashbuckler also appears in XGtE, where the further explanatory blurb is not included.
            $endgroup$
            – Carcer
            Apr 28 at 16:18






          • 3




            $begingroup$
            This is why I specifically cited which book I was referencing
            $endgroup$
            – Seidr
            Apr 28 at 16:26






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            This exactly explains my puzzlement. I had surmised that the point was that a swashbuckler could use their bonus action to attack, then use fancy footwork, but it seemed strange that it was not spelled out. My DDB online reference lacks the blurb you mention in the subtype description, although it is in in the online version of SCAG. Perfect answer, thank you.
            $endgroup$
            – Jack
            Apr 28 at 16:29






          • 3




            $begingroup$
            @Seidr sure. I'm just calling it out explicitly as that provides context to readers as to why this may not have been obvious to the OP.
            $endgroup$
            – Carcer
            Apr 28 at 18:25










          • $begingroup$
            @Carcer I appreciate that. In fact, had I seen that blurb I wouldn't have had the question. I would delete it as useless except others might look at XGtE or some other reference (such as the DDB one), and make the same mistake. Thank you.
            $endgroup$
            – Jack
            Apr 28 at 20:10


















          14












          $begingroup$

          This is probably a reference to the Swashbuckler's Fancy Footwork feature:




          When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal. During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
          creature, that creature can’t make opportunity attacks against you for the rest of your turn.




          A non-swashbuckler rogue who wants to make a hit-and-run attack without provoking opportunity attacks has to use their bonus action to Disengage, but a Swashbuckler Rogue doesn't need to use their bonus action (since the target of their attack cannot make OAs against them, whether the Swashbuckler hits or not) and so they retain the use of their bonus action and can use it to two-weapon fight.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            This explains it so much better than the accepted answer
            $endgroup$
            – András
            Apr 29 at 7:36











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "122"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f147061%2fhow-does-a-swashbuckler-rogue-fight-with-two-weapons-while-safely-darting-away%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          40












          $begingroup$

          The next paragraph reads




          When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn
          how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal.
          During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
          creature, that creature can't make opportunity attacks
          against you for the rest of your turn. -SCAG pg. 135




          It further goes on to clarify in a blurb on the next page




          This allows you to use your bonus action to
          fight with two weapons, and then safely evade each foe
          you attacked. -SCAG pg. 136




          So while holding two weapons, if you are surrounded you can make two attacks against up to two different creatures and get away unharmed. It doesn't specifically state that it needs to hit, just that the attack be made.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$








          • 6




            $begingroup$
            Do note that the Swashbuckler also appears in XGtE, where the further explanatory blurb is not included.
            $endgroup$
            – Carcer
            Apr 28 at 16:18






          • 3




            $begingroup$
            This is why I specifically cited which book I was referencing
            $endgroup$
            – Seidr
            Apr 28 at 16:26






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            This exactly explains my puzzlement. I had surmised that the point was that a swashbuckler could use their bonus action to attack, then use fancy footwork, but it seemed strange that it was not spelled out. My DDB online reference lacks the blurb you mention in the subtype description, although it is in in the online version of SCAG. Perfect answer, thank you.
            $endgroup$
            – Jack
            Apr 28 at 16:29






          • 3




            $begingroup$
            @Seidr sure. I'm just calling it out explicitly as that provides context to readers as to why this may not have been obvious to the OP.
            $endgroup$
            – Carcer
            Apr 28 at 18:25










          • $begingroup$
            @Carcer I appreciate that. In fact, had I seen that blurb I wouldn't have had the question. I would delete it as useless except others might look at XGtE or some other reference (such as the DDB one), and make the same mistake. Thank you.
            $endgroup$
            – Jack
            Apr 28 at 20:10















          40












          $begingroup$

          The next paragraph reads




          When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn
          how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal.
          During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
          creature, that creature can't make opportunity attacks
          against you for the rest of your turn. -SCAG pg. 135




          It further goes on to clarify in a blurb on the next page




          This allows you to use your bonus action to
          fight with two weapons, and then safely evade each foe
          you attacked. -SCAG pg. 136




          So while holding two weapons, if you are surrounded you can make two attacks against up to two different creatures and get away unharmed. It doesn't specifically state that it needs to hit, just that the attack be made.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$








          • 6




            $begingroup$
            Do note that the Swashbuckler also appears in XGtE, where the further explanatory blurb is not included.
            $endgroup$
            – Carcer
            Apr 28 at 16:18






          • 3




            $begingroup$
            This is why I specifically cited which book I was referencing
            $endgroup$
            – Seidr
            Apr 28 at 16:26






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            This exactly explains my puzzlement. I had surmised that the point was that a swashbuckler could use their bonus action to attack, then use fancy footwork, but it seemed strange that it was not spelled out. My DDB online reference lacks the blurb you mention in the subtype description, although it is in in the online version of SCAG. Perfect answer, thank you.
            $endgroup$
            – Jack
            Apr 28 at 16:29






          • 3




            $begingroup$
            @Seidr sure. I'm just calling it out explicitly as that provides context to readers as to why this may not have been obvious to the OP.
            $endgroup$
            – Carcer
            Apr 28 at 18:25










          • $begingroup$
            @Carcer I appreciate that. In fact, had I seen that blurb I wouldn't have had the question. I would delete it as useless except others might look at XGtE or some other reference (such as the DDB one), and make the same mistake. Thank you.
            $endgroup$
            – Jack
            Apr 28 at 20:10













          40












          40








          40





          $begingroup$

          The next paragraph reads




          When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn
          how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal.
          During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
          creature, that creature can't make opportunity attacks
          against you for the rest of your turn. -SCAG pg. 135




          It further goes on to clarify in a blurb on the next page




          This allows you to use your bonus action to
          fight with two weapons, and then safely evade each foe
          you attacked. -SCAG pg. 136




          So while holding two weapons, if you are surrounded you can make two attacks against up to two different creatures and get away unharmed. It doesn't specifically state that it needs to hit, just that the attack be made.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          The next paragraph reads




          When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn
          how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal.
          During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
          creature, that creature can't make opportunity attacks
          against you for the rest of your turn. -SCAG pg. 135




          It further goes on to clarify in a blurb on the next page




          This allows you to use your bonus action to
          fight with two weapons, and then safely evade each foe
          you attacked. -SCAG pg. 136




          So while holding two weapons, if you are surrounded you can make two attacks against up to two different creatures and get away unharmed. It doesn't specifically state that it needs to hit, just that the attack be made.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Apr 28 at 16:14









          SeidrSeidr

          787616




          787616







          • 6




            $begingroup$
            Do note that the Swashbuckler also appears in XGtE, where the further explanatory blurb is not included.
            $endgroup$
            – Carcer
            Apr 28 at 16:18






          • 3




            $begingroup$
            This is why I specifically cited which book I was referencing
            $endgroup$
            – Seidr
            Apr 28 at 16:26






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            This exactly explains my puzzlement. I had surmised that the point was that a swashbuckler could use their bonus action to attack, then use fancy footwork, but it seemed strange that it was not spelled out. My DDB online reference lacks the blurb you mention in the subtype description, although it is in in the online version of SCAG. Perfect answer, thank you.
            $endgroup$
            – Jack
            Apr 28 at 16:29






          • 3




            $begingroup$
            @Seidr sure. I'm just calling it out explicitly as that provides context to readers as to why this may not have been obvious to the OP.
            $endgroup$
            – Carcer
            Apr 28 at 18:25










          • $begingroup$
            @Carcer I appreciate that. In fact, had I seen that blurb I wouldn't have had the question. I would delete it as useless except others might look at XGtE or some other reference (such as the DDB one), and make the same mistake. Thank you.
            $endgroup$
            – Jack
            Apr 28 at 20:10












          • 6




            $begingroup$
            Do note that the Swashbuckler also appears in XGtE, where the further explanatory blurb is not included.
            $endgroup$
            – Carcer
            Apr 28 at 16:18






          • 3




            $begingroup$
            This is why I specifically cited which book I was referencing
            $endgroup$
            – Seidr
            Apr 28 at 16:26






          • 2




            $begingroup$
            This exactly explains my puzzlement. I had surmised that the point was that a swashbuckler could use their bonus action to attack, then use fancy footwork, but it seemed strange that it was not spelled out. My DDB online reference lacks the blurb you mention in the subtype description, although it is in in the online version of SCAG. Perfect answer, thank you.
            $endgroup$
            – Jack
            Apr 28 at 16:29






          • 3




            $begingroup$
            @Seidr sure. I'm just calling it out explicitly as that provides context to readers as to why this may not have been obvious to the OP.
            $endgroup$
            – Carcer
            Apr 28 at 18:25










          • $begingroup$
            @Carcer I appreciate that. In fact, had I seen that blurb I wouldn't have had the question. I would delete it as useless except others might look at XGtE or some other reference (such as the DDB one), and make the same mistake. Thank you.
            $endgroup$
            – Jack
            Apr 28 at 20:10







          6




          6




          $begingroup$
          Do note that the Swashbuckler also appears in XGtE, where the further explanatory blurb is not included.
          $endgroup$
          – Carcer
          Apr 28 at 16:18




          $begingroup$
          Do note that the Swashbuckler also appears in XGtE, where the further explanatory blurb is not included.
          $endgroup$
          – Carcer
          Apr 28 at 16:18




          3




          3




          $begingroup$
          This is why I specifically cited which book I was referencing
          $endgroup$
          – Seidr
          Apr 28 at 16:26




          $begingroup$
          This is why I specifically cited which book I was referencing
          $endgroup$
          – Seidr
          Apr 28 at 16:26




          2




          2




          $begingroup$
          This exactly explains my puzzlement. I had surmised that the point was that a swashbuckler could use their bonus action to attack, then use fancy footwork, but it seemed strange that it was not spelled out. My DDB online reference lacks the blurb you mention in the subtype description, although it is in in the online version of SCAG. Perfect answer, thank you.
          $endgroup$
          – Jack
          Apr 28 at 16:29




          $begingroup$
          This exactly explains my puzzlement. I had surmised that the point was that a swashbuckler could use their bonus action to attack, then use fancy footwork, but it seemed strange that it was not spelled out. My DDB online reference lacks the blurb you mention in the subtype description, although it is in in the online version of SCAG. Perfect answer, thank you.
          $endgroup$
          – Jack
          Apr 28 at 16:29




          3




          3




          $begingroup$
          @Seidr sure. I'm just calling it out explicitly as that provides context to readers as to why this may not have been obvious to the OP.
          $endgroup$
          – Carcer
          Apr 28 at 18:25




          $begingroup$
          @Seidr sure. I'm just calling it out explicitly as that provides context to readers as to why this may not have been obvious to the OP.
          $endgroup$
          – Carcer
          Apr 28 at 18:25












          $begingroup$
          @Carcer I appreciate that. In fact, had I seen that blurb I wouldn't have had the question. I would delete it as useless except others might look at XGtE or some other reference (such as the DDB one), and make the same mistake. Thank you.
          $endgroup$
          – Jack
          Apr 28 at 20:10




          $begingroup$
          @Carcer I appreciate that. In fact, had I seen that blurb I wouldn't have had the question. I would delete it as useless except others might look at XGtE or some other reference (such as the DDB one), and make the same mistake. Thank you.
          $endgroup$
          – Jack
          Apr 28 at 20:10













          14












          $begingroup$

          This is probably a reference to the Swashbuckler's Fancy Footwork feature:




          When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal. During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
          creature, that creature can’t make opportunity attacks against you for the rest of your turn.




          A non-swashbuckler rogue who wants to make a hit-and-run attack without provoking opportunity attacks has to use their bonus action to Disengage, but a Swashbuckler Rogue doesn't need to use their bonus action (since the target of their attack cannot make OAs against them, whether the Swashbuckler hits or not) and so they retain the use of their bonus action and can use it to two-weapon fight.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            This explains it so much better than the accepted answer
            $endgroup$
            – András
            Apr 29 at 7:36















          14












          $begingroup$

          This is probably a reference to the Swashbuckler's Fancy Footwork feature:




          When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal. During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
          creature, that creature can’t make opportunity attacks against you for the rest of your turn.




          A non-swashbuckler rogue who wants to make a hit-and-run attack without provoking opportunity attacks has to use their bonus action to Disengage, but a Swashbuckler Rogue doesn't need to use their bonus action (since the target of their attack cannot make OAs against them, whether the Swashbuckler hits or not) and so they retain the use of their bonus action and can use it to two-weapon fight.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$








          • 1




            $begingroup$
            This explains it so much better than the accepted answer
            $endgroup$
            – András
            Apr 29 at 7:36













          14












          14








          14





          $begingroup$

          This is probably a reference to the Swashbuckler's Fancy Footwork feature:




          When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal. During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
          creature, that creature can’t make opportunity attacks against you for the rest of your turn.




          A non-swashbuckler rogue who wants to make a hit-and-run attack without provoking opportunity attacks has to use their bonus action to Disengage, but a Swashbuckler Rogue doesn't need to use their bonus action (since the target of their attack cannot make OAs against them, whether the Swashbuckler hits or not) and so they retain the use of their bonus action and can use it to two-weapon fight.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          This is probably a reference to the Swashbuckler's Fancy Footwork feature:




          When you choose this archetype at 3rd level, you learn how to land a strike and then slip away without reprisal. During your turn, if you make a melee attack against a
          creature, that creature can’t make opportunity attacks against you for the rest of your turn.




          A non-swashbuckler rogue who wants to make a hit-and-run attack without provoking opportunity attacks has to use their bonus action to Disengage, but a Swashbuckler Rogue doesn't need to use their bonus action (since the target of their attack cannot make OAs against them, whether the Swashbuckler hits or not) and so they retain the use of their bonus action and can use it to two-weapon fight.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Apr 28 at 16:15









          CarcerCarcer

          27.7k583146




          27.7k583146







          • 1




            $begingroup$
            This explains it so much better than the accepted answer
            $endgroup$
            – András
            Apr 29 at 7:36












          • 1




            $begingroup$
            This explains it so much better than the accepted answer
            $endgroup$
            – András
            Apr 29 at 7:36







          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          This explains it so much better than the accepted answer
          $endgroup$
          – András
          Apr 29 at 7:36




          $begingroup$
          This explains it so much better than the accepted answer
          $endgroup$
          – András
          Apr 29 at 7:36

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f147061%2fhow-does-a-swashbuckler-rogue-fight-with-two-weapons-while-safely-darting-away%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Wikipedia:Vital articles Мазмуну Biography - Өмүр баян Philosophy and psychology - Философия жана психология Religion - Дин Social sciences - Коомдук илимдер Language and literature - Тил жана адабият Science - Илим Technology - Технология Arts and recreation - Искусство жана эс алуу History and geography - Тарых жана география Навигация менюсу

          Bruxelas-Capital Índice Historia | Composición | Situación lingüística | Clima | Cidades irmandadas | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióneO uso das linguas en Bruxelas e a situación do neerlandés"Rexión de Bruxelas Capital"o orixinalSitio da rexiónPáxina de Bruselas no sitio da Oficina de Promoción Turística de Valonia e BruxelasMapa Interactivo da Rexión de Bruxelas-CapitaleeWorldCat332144929079854441105155190212ID28008674080552-90000 0001 0666 3698n94104302ID540940339365017018237

          What should I write in an apology letter, since I have decided not to join a company after accepting an offer letterShould I keep looking after accepting a job offer?What should I do when I've been verbally told I would get an offer letter, but still haven't gotten one after 4 weeks?Do I accept an offer from a company that I am not likely to join?New job hasn't confirmed starting date and I want to give current employer as much notice as possibleHow should I address my manager in my resignation letter?HR delayed background verification, now jobless as resignedNo email communication after accepting a formal written offer. How should I phrase the call?What should I do if after receiving a verbal offer letter I am informed that my written job offer is put on hold due to some internal issues?Should I inform the current employer that I am about to resign within 1-2 weeks since I have signed the offer letter and waiting for visa?What company will do, if I send their offer letter to another company