Why didn't this hurt this character as badly?What did the Scarlet Witch show the Hulk/Bruce Banner?Why was capturing this character so easy?Why didn't Thanos kill this character?How can Scarlet Witch hold off Thanos?Why didn't this character get involved earlier?Why didn't this character die even though they shot this person in Avengers: Endgame?Do we know what happened to this character in Avengers: Endgame?Can this character be alive?What is this character a reference to?How are the events from Infinity War possible if this character is dead?

In a series of books, what happens after the coming of age?

Make me a minimum magic sum

What's the 2-minute timer on mobile Deutsche Bahn tickets?

Is there an idiom that means that a clothe fits perfectly?

Does this website provide consistent translation into Wookiee?

How do I give a darkroom course without negs from the attendees?

What does “two-bit (jerk)” mean?

What wise choice does Varys intends to make?

Good introductory book to type theory?

Why were the rules for Proliferate changed?

Crime rates in a post-scarcity economy

Did any early RISC OS precursor run on the BBC Micro?

Convert a huge txt-file into a dataset

All of my Firefox add-ons have been disabled suddenly, how can I re-enable them?

Can anyone identify this unknown 1988 PC card from The Palantir Corporation?

While drilling into kitchen wall, hit a wire - any advice?

Do the Zhentarim fire members for killing fellow members?

TikZ/PGF draw algorithm

How could a humanoid creature completely form within the span of 24 hours?

Game artist computer workstation set-up – is this overkill?

How does "politician" work as a job/career?

Function annotation with two or more return parameters

Learning how to read schematics, questions about fractional voltage in schematic

Gift for mentor after his thesis defense?



Why didn't this hurt this character as badly?


What did the Scarlet Witch show the Hulk/Bruce Banner?Why was capturing this character so easy?Why didn't Thanos kill this character?How can Scarlet Witch hold off Thanos?Why didn't this character get involved earlier?Why didn't this character die even though they shot this person in Avengers: Endgame?Do we know what happened to this character in Avengers: Endgame?Can this character be alive?What is this character a reference to?How are the events from Infinity War possible if this character is dead?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








11















In Avengers: Endgame




Hulk briefly wields all six Infinity Stones in the new gauntlet and screams in pain and is barely able to snap. It's also stated that he was the best fit for the gauntlet.




However




Stark later wields all 6 and while evidently in pain, is still able to snap with little effort and even says "I am Iron Man". While the snap does kill him, it doesn't seem like wielding them hurt him nearly as badly.




Why is this? Adrenaline, desperation, or something else?










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    I think the snap can kill, not holding the gauntlet.

    – Lefteris008
    Apr 28 at 16:13

















11















In Avengers: Endgame




Hulk briefly wields all six Infinity Stones in the new gauntlet and screams in pain and is barely able to snap. It's also stated that he was the best fit for the gauntlet.




However




Stark later wields all 6 and while evidently in pain, is still able to snap with little effort and even says "I am Iron Man". While the snap does kill him, it doesn't seem like wielding them hurt him nearly as badly.




Why is this? Adrenaline, desperation, or something else?










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    I think the snap can kill, not holding the gauntlet.

    – Lefteris008
    Apr 28 at 16:13













11












11








11








In Avengers: Endgame




Hulk briefly wields all six Infinity Stones in the new gauntlet and screams in pain and is barely able to snap. It's also stated that he was the best fit for the gauntlet.




However




Stark later wields all 6 and while evidently in pain, is still able to snap with little effort and even says "I am Iron Man". While the snap does kill him, it doesn't seem like wielding them hurt him nearly as badly.




Why is this? Adrenaline, desperation, or something else?










share|improve this question
















In Avengers: Endgame




Hulk briefly wields all six Infinity Stones in the new gauntlet and screams in pain and is barely able to snap. It's also stated that he was the best fit for the gauntlet.




However




Stark later wields all 6 and while evidently in pain, is still able to snap with little effort and even says "I am Iron Man". While the snap does kill him, it doesn't seem like wielding them hurt him nearly as badly.




Why is this? Adrenaline, desperation, or something else?







marvel marvel-cinematic-universe avengers-endgame






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 28 at 16:15









TheLethalCarrot

56.1k22334383




56.1k22334383










asked Apr 28 at 16:07









GremerGremer

565816




565816







  • 1





    I think the snap can kill, not holding the gauntlet.

    – Lefteris008
    Apr 28 at 16:13












  • 1





    I think the snap can kill, not holding the gauntlet.

    – Lefteris008
    Apr 28 at 16:13







1




1





I think the snap can kill, not holding the gauntlet.

– Lefteris008
Apr 28 at 16:13





I think the snap can kill, not holding the gauntlet.

– Lefteris008
Apr 28 at 16:13










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















15














Hulk took longer and had more pain whilst wielding the Infinity Stones in the Infinity Gauntlet because he was trying to bring Nat back and undo the previous snap by Thanos. Below is the quote from memory so is most certainly incorrect.




Hulk: I tried to bring her back, I couldn’t.



Avengers: Endgame




However, Tony just removed the bad guys of Thanos and his team from 2014 so had less to do.



As we can see the affects of the snap on Hulk were less than they were on Tony who




Dies from it




Whereas Hulk merely has his arm hurt.



It’s also worth noting that Hulk has superhuman healing abilities and so has a higher chance of surviving the Stone’s powers as he would be more resilient that Stark who is a normal, albeit highly intelligent, human.






share|improve this answer

























  • I guess that's fair. I thought when Hulk was hurt, it wasn't from what he was trying to do, it was because he had all six stones. It had the same burst of energy that went through Thanos in IW and that was what seemed to hurt Hulk. I might be wrong.

    – Gremer
    Apr 28 at 16:26






  • 6





    Also recall that when Thanos used the stones early in Endgame, he was nearly killed by the power necessary for that use. It does seem that what one does with the stones is related to how much power is necessary to perform that act. While Hulk's universe-impacting act required far more power that Tony's field-of-battle impact, Hulk is far more resilient than Tony.

    – Rob
    Apr 28 at 19:37






  • 1





    I'm not asking about why Tony died or anything like that, it's stated in the movie. But it seemed to me like just wearing the stones hurt both Thanos and Hulk. Why wasn't Tony hurt from wearing them?

    – Gremer
    Apr 28 at 20:28






  • 4





    @Gremer If you're asking why Tony didn't suffer immediate consequences upon inserting the stones, I think it must be that his armor protected him. This is also why Tony doesn't experience the same immediate power surge Thanos and Hulk suffer. But he wasn't completely immune: slivers of light start to course through Tony just after he mounts the stones, and there is evidence of the type of skin damage Quill and other mortals suffer when handling a stone. Had he not snapped, I think there's on-screen evidence to suggest he would soon have been consumed by that power despite the armor.

    – Rob
    Apr 28 at 23:12






  • 2





    @Rob Yes, that is exactly what I was trying to ask. Thank you. I guess the armor idea makes sense, but it seems odd given that the other gauntlets were made specifically for the stones. Maybe he saw what happened and his nanobots were stopping the surge or something.

    – Gremer
    Apr 29 at 2:30


















3














  1. It is incorrect that this character wasn't hurt as badly. He had visible damage on the entire side of his body, and later, literally died. I believe that is as much as a character can be hurt!

  2. The Hulk has regenerative capabilities, so his powers were probably healing while he was trying to not just undo, but try to restore that other thing. Hence he didn't die.





share|improve this answer


















  • 1





    You may wish to read the comments on the other answer. OP isn’t asking about effects of using the stones, in which case Tony obviously has the worst effect. OP is asking about the affects of simply wearing the gauntlet and how that seems to hurt others more than Tony.

    – Notts90
    Apr 30 at 20:06


















1














Hulk was only hurt as bad as he was because he went from 0 to 6 stones immediately. Remember thanos got every stone 1 at a time and had time to acclimate to each stones powers. Also he was using a gauntlet made by earth metals created by tony stark and as bad ass as it looked it wasn't a legendary gauntlet created by itry the dwarf. I believe that having the proper gauntlet alone would have helped and hulk would have been ok. as far as I can tell tony was just desperate and also he had full iron man armor maybe the armor acted as a buffer but who knows.






share|improve this answer








New contributor



wizeguy86 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • Do you have any evidence to back this up?

    – Mat Cauthon
    May 3 at 4:05


















0














Like what Hulk said in Endgame the cosmic energy from the Stones is mostly gamma and Hulk is gamma immune to a certain degree if not completely. However Tony is just a regular human being which is why he suffered greater consequences. Despite the difference in their usage of the Stones Tony died even though he did lesser with the Stones because ultimately he is a regular human. So doing virtually anything with all 6 would have killed him.






share|improve this answer










New contributor



monty rafford is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "186"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f211059%2fwhy-didnt-this-hurt-this-character-as-badly%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    15














    Hulk took longer and had more pain whilst wielding the Infinity Stones in the Infinity Gauntlet because he was trying to bring Nat back and undo the previous snap by Thanos. Below is the quote from memory so is most certainly incorrect.




    Hulk: I tried to bring her back, I couldn’t.



    Avengers: Endgame




    However, Tony just removed the bad guys of Thanos and his team from 2014 so had less to do.



    As we can see the affects of the snap on Hulk were less than they were on Tony who




    Dies from it




    Whereas Hulk merely has his arm hurt.



    It’s also worth noting that Hulk has superhuman healing abilities and so has a higher chance of surviving the Stone’s powers as he would be more resilient that Stark who is a normal, albeit highly intelligent, human.






    share|improve this answer

























    • I guess that's fair. I thought when Hulk was hurt, it wasn't from what he was trying to do, it was because he had all six stones. It had the same burst of energy that went through Thanos in IW and that was what seemed to hurt Hulk. I might be wrong.

      – Gremer
      Apr 28 at 16:26






    • 6





      Also recall that when Thanos used the stones early in Endgame, he was nearly killed by the power necessary for that use. It does seem that what one does with the stones is related to how much power is necessary to perform that act. While Hulk's universe-impacting act required far more power that Tony's field-of-battle impact, Hulk is far more resilient than Tony.

      – Rob
      Apr 28 at 19:37






    • 1





      I'm not asking about why Tony died or anything like that, it's stated in the movie. But it seemed to me like just wearing the stones hurt both Thanos and Hulk. Why wasn't Tony hurt from wearing them?

      – Gremer
      Apr 28 at 20:28






    • 4





      @Gremer If you're asking why Tony didn't suffer immediate consequences upon inserting the stones, I think it must be that his armor protected him. This is also why Tony doesn't experience the same immediate power surge Thanos and Hulk suffer. But he wasn't completely immune: slivers of light start to course through Tony just after he mounts the stones, and there is evidence of the type of skin damage Quill and other mortals suffer when handling a stone. Had he not snapped, I think there's on-screen evidence to suggest he would soon have been consumed by that power despite the armor.

      – Rob
      Apr 28 at 23:12






    • 2





      @Rob Yes, that is exactly what I was trying to ask. Thank you. I guess the armor idea makes sense, but it seems odd given that the other gauntlets were made specifically for the stones. Maybe he saw what happened and his nanobots were stopping the surge or something.

      – Gremer
      Apr 29 at 2:30















    15














    Hulk took longer and had more pain whilst wielding the Infinity Stones in the Infinity Gauntlet because he was trying to bring Nat back and undo the previous snap by Thanos. Below is the quote from memory so is most certainly incorrect.




    Hulk: I tried to bring her back, I couldn’t.



    Avengers: Endgame




    However, Tony just removed the bad guys of Thanos and his team from 2014 so had less to do.



    As we can see the affects of the snap on Hulk were less than they were on Tony who




    Dies from it




    Whereas Hulk merely has his arm hurt.



    It’s also worth noting that Hulk has superhuman healing abilities and so has a higher chance of surviving the Stone’s powers as he would be more resilient that Stark who is a normal, albeit highly intelligent, human.






    share|improve this answer

























    • I guess that's fair. I thought when Hulk was hurt, it wasn't from what he was trying to do, it was because he had all six stones. It had the same burst of energy that went through Thanos in IW and that was what seemed to hurt Hulk. I might be wrong.

      – Gremer
      Apr 28 at 16:26






    • 6





      Also recall that when Thanos used the stones early in Endgame, he was nearly killed by the power necessary for that use. It does seem that what one does with the stones is related to how much power is necessary to perform that act. While Hulk's universe-impacting act required far more power that Tony's field-of-battle impact, Hulk is far more resilient than Tony.

      – Rob
      Apr 28 at 19:37






    • 1





      I'm not asking about why Tony died or anything like that, it's stated in the movie. But it seemed to me like just wearing the stones hurt both Thanos and Hulk. Why wasn't Tony hurt from wearing them?

      – Gremer
      Apr 28 at 20:28






    • 4





      @Gremer If you're asking why Tony didn't suffer immediate consequences upon inserting the stones, I think it must be that his armor protected him. This is also why Tony doesn't experience the same immediate power surge Thanos and Hulk suffer. But he wasn't completely immune: slivers of light start to course through Tony just after he mounts the stones, and there is evidence of the type of skin damage Quill and other mortals suffer when handling a stone. Had he not snapped, I think there's on-screen evidence to suggest he would soon have been consumed by that power despite the armor.

      – Rob
      Apr 28 at 23:12






    • 2





      @Rob Yes, that is exactly what I was trying to ask. Thank you. I guess the armor idea makes sense, but it seems odd given that the other gauntlets were made specifically for the stones. Maybe he saw what happened and his nanobots were stopping the surge or something.

      – Gremer
      Apr 29 at 2:30













    15












    15








    15







    Hulk took longer and had more pain whilst wielding the Infinity Stones in the Infinity Gauntlet because he was trying to bring Nat back and undo the previous snap by Thanos. Below is the quote from memory so is most certainly incorrect.




    Hulk: I tried to bring her back, I couldn’t.



    Avengers: Endgame




    However, Tony just removed the bad guys of Thanos and his team from 2014 so had less to do.



    As we can see the affects of the snap on Hulk were less than they were on Tony who




    Dies from it




    Whereas Hulk merely has his arm hurt.



    It’s also worth noting that Hulk has superhuman healing abilities and so has a higher chance of surviving the Stone’s powers as he would be more resilient that Stark who is a normal, albeit highly intelligent, human.






    share|improve this answer















    Hulk took longer and had more pain whilst wielding the Infinity Stones in the Infinity Gauntlet because he was trying to bring Nat back and undo the previous snap by Thanos. Below is the quote from memory so is most certainly incorrect.




    Hulk: I tried to bring her back, I couldn’t.



    Avengers: Endgame




    However, Tony just removed the bad guys of Thanos and his team from 2014 so had less to do.



    As we can see the affects of the snap on Hulk were less than they were on Tony who




    Dies from it




    Whereas Hulk merely has his arm hurt.



    It’s also worth noting that Hulk has superhuman healing abilities and so has a higher chance of surviving the Stone’s powers as he would be more resilient that Stark who is a normal, albeit highly intelligent, human.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Apr 28 at 19:41

























    answered Apr 28 at 16:18









    TheLethalCarrotTheLethalCarrot

    56.1k22334383




    56.1k22334383












    • I guess that's fair. I thought when Hulk was hurt, it wasn't from what he was trying to do, it was because he had all six stones. It had the same burst of energy that went through Thanos in IW and that was what seemed to hurt Hulk. I might be wrong.

      – Gremer
      Apr 28 at 16:26






    • 6





      Also recall that when Thanos used the stones early in Endgame, he was nearly killed by the power necessary for that use. It does seem that what one does with the stones is related to how much power is necessary to perform that act. While Hulk's universe-impacting act required far more power that Tony's field-of-battle impact, Hulk is far more resilient than Tony.

      – Rob
      Apr 28 at 19:37






    • 1





      I'm not asking about why Tony died or anything like that, it's stated in the movie. But it seemed to me like just wearing the stones hurt both Thanos and Hulk. Why wasn't Tony hurt from wearing them?

      – Gremer
      Apr 28 at 20:28






    • 4





      @Gremer If you're asking why Tony didn't suffer immediate consequences upon inserting the stones, I think it must be that his armor protected him. This is also why Tony doesn't experience the same immediate power surge Thanos and Hulk suffer. But he wasn't completely immune: slivers of light start to course through Tony just after he mounts the stones, and there is evidence of the type of skin damage Quill and other mortals suffer when handling a stone. Had he not snapped, I think there's on-screen evidence to suggest he would soon have been consumed by that power despite the armor.

      – Rob
      Apr 28 at 23:12






    • 2





      @Rob Yes, that is exactly what I was trying to ask. Thank you. I guess the armor idea makes sense, but it seems odd given that the other gauntlets were made specifically for the stones. Maybe he saw what happened and his nanobots were stopping the surge or something.

      – Gremer
      Apr 29 at 2:30

















    • I guess that's fair. I thought when Hulk was hurt, it wasn't from what he was trying to do, it was because he had all six stones. It had the same burst of energy that went through Thanos in IW and that was what seemed to hurt Hulk. I might be wrong.

      – Gremer
      Apr 28 at 16:26






    • 6





      Also recall that when Thanos used the stones early in Endgame, he was nearly killed by the power necessary for that use. It does seem that what one does with the stones is related to how much power is necessary to perform that act. While Hulk's universe-impacting act required far more power that Tony's field-of-battle impact, Hulk is far more resilient than Tony.

      – Rob
      Apr 28 at 19:37






    • 1





      I'm not asking about why Tony died or anything like that, it's stated in the movie. But it seemed to me like just wearing the stones hurt both Thanos and Hulk. Why wasn't Tony hurt from wearing them?

      – Gremer
      Apr 28 at 20:28






    • 4





      @Gremer If you're asking why Tony didn't suffer immediate consequences upon inserting the stones, I think it must be that his armor protected him. This is also why Tony doesn't experience the same immediate power surge Thanos and Hulk suffer. But he wasn't completely immune: slivers of light start to course through Tony just after he mounts the stones, and there is evidence of the type of skin damage Quill and other mortals suffer when handling a stone. Had he not snapped, I think there's on-screen evidence to suggest he would soon have been consumed by that power despite the armor.

      – Rob
      Apr 28 at 23:12






    • 2





      @Rob Yes, that is exactly what I was trying to ask. Thank you. I guess the armor idea makes sense, but it seems odd given that the other gauntlets were made specifically for the stones. Maybe he saw what happened and his nanobots were stopping the surge or something.

      – Gremer
      Apr 29 at 2:30
















    I guess that's fair. I thought when Hulk was hurt, it wasn't from what he was trying to do, it was because he had all six stones. It had the same burst of energy that went through Thanos in IW and that was what seemed to hurt Hulk. I might be wrong.

    – Gremer
    Apr 28 at 16:26





    I guess that's fair. I thought when Hulk was hurt, it wasn't from what he was trying to do, it was because he had all six stones. It had the same burst of energy that went through Thanos in IW and that was what seemed to hurt Hulk. I might be wrong.

    – Gremer
    Apr 28 at 16:26




    6




    6





    Also recall that when Thanos used the stones early in Endgame, he was nearly killed by the power necessary for that use. It does seem that what one does with the stones is related to how much power is necessary to perform that act. While Hulk's universe-impacting act required far more power that Tony's field-of-battle impact, Hulk is far more resilient than Tony.

    – Rob
    Apr 28 at 19:37





    Also recall that when Thanos used the stones early in Endgame, he was nearly killed by the power necessary for that use. It does seem that what one does with the stones is related to how much power is necessary to perform that act. While Hulk's universe-impacting act required far more power that Tony's field-of-battle impact, Hulk is far more resilient than Tony.

    – Rob
    Apr 28 at 19:37




    1




    1





    I'm not asking about why Tony died or anything like that, it's stated in the movie. But it seemed to me like just wearing the stones hurt both Thanos and Hulk. Why wasn't Tony hurt from wearing them?

    – Gremer
    Apr 28 at 20:28





    I'm not asking about why Tony died or anything like that, it's stated in the movie. But it seemed to me like just wearing the stones hurt both Thanos and Hulk. Why wasn't Tony hurt from wearing them?

    – Gremer
    Apr 28 at 20:28




    4




    4





    @Gremer If you're asking why Tony didn't suffer immediate consequences upon inserting the stones, I think it must be that his armor protected him. This is also why Tony doesn't experience the same immediate power surge Thanos and Hulk suffer. But he wasn't completely immune: slivers of light start to course through Tony just after he mounts the stones, and there is evidence of the type of skin damage Quill and other mortals suffer when handling a stone. Had he not snapped, I think there's on-screen evidence to suggest he would soon have been consumed by that power despite the armor.

    – Rob
    Apr 28 at 23:12





    @Gremer If you're asking why Tony didn't suffer immediate consequences upon inserting the stones, I think it must be that his armor protected him. This is also why Tony doesn't experience the same immediate power surge Thanos and Hulk suffer. But he wasn't completely immune: slivers of light start to course through Tony just after he mounts the stones, and there is evidence of the type of skin damage Quill and other mortals suffer when handling a stone. Had he not snapped, I think there's on-screen evidence to suggest he would soon have been consumed by that power despite the armor.

    – Rob
    Apr 28 at 23:12




    2




    2





    @Rob Yes, that is exactly what I was trying to ask. Thank you. I guess the armor idea makes sense, but it seems odd given that the other gauntlets were made specifically for the stones. Maybe he saw what happened and his nanobots were stopping the surge or something.

    – Gremer
    Apr 29 at 2:30





    @Rob Yes, that is exactly what I was trying to ask. Thank you. I guess the armor idea makes sense, but it seems odd given that the other gauntlets were made specifically for the stones. Maybe he saw what happened and his nanobots were stopping the surge or something.

    – Gremer
    Apr 29 at 2:30













    3














    1. It is incorrect that this character wasn't hurt as badly. He had visible damage on the entire side of his body, and later, literally died. I believe that is as much as a character can be hurt!

    2. The Hulk has regenerative capabilities, so his powers were probably healing while he was trying to not just undo, but try to restore that other thing. Hence he didn't die.





    share|improve this answer


















    • 1





      You may wish to read the comments on the other answer. OP isn’t asking about effects of using the stones, in which case Tony obviously has the worst effect. OP is asking about the affects of simply wearing the gauntlet and how that seems to hurt others more than Tony.

      – Notts90
      Apr 30 at 20:06















    3














    1. It is incorrect that this character wasn't hurt as badly. He had visible damage on the entire side of his body, and later, literally died. I believe that is as much as a character can be hurt!

    2. The Hulk has regenerative capabilities, so his powers were probably healing while he was trying to not just undo, but try to restore that other thing. Hence he didn't die.





    share|improve this answer


















    • 1





      You may wish to read the comments on the other answer. OP isn’t asking about effects of using the stones, in which case Tony obviously has the worst effect. OP is asking about the affects of simply wearing the gauntlet and how that seems to hurt others more than Tony.

      – Notts90
      Apr 30 at 20:06













    3












    3








    3







    1. It is incorrect that this character wasn't hurt as badly. He had visible damage on the entire side of his body, and later, literally died. I believe that is as much as a character can be hurt!

    2. The Hulk has regenerative capabilities, so his powers were probably healing while he was trying to not just undo, but try to restore that other thing. Hence he didn't die.





    share|improve this answer













    1. It is incorrect that this character wasn't hurt as badly. He had visible damage on the entire side of his body, and later, literally died. I believe that is as much as a character can be hurt!

    2. The Hulk has regenerative capabilities, so his powers were probably healing while he was trying to not just undo, but try to restore that other thing. Hence he didn't die.






    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Apr 29 at 7:20









    Stark07Stark07

    11.8k753101




    11.8k753101







    • 1





      You may wish to read the comments on the other answer. OP isn’t asking about effects of using the stones, in which case Tony obviously has the worst effect. OP is asking about the affects of simply wearing the gauntlet and how that seems to hurt others more than Tony.

      – Notts90
      Apr 30 at 20:06












    • 1





      You may wish to read the comments on the other answer. OP isn’t asking about effects of using the stones, in which case Tony obviously has the worst effect. OP is asking about the affects of simply wearing the gauntlet and how that seems to hurt others more than Tony.

      – Notts90
      Apr 30 at 20:06







    1




    1





    You may wish to read the comments on the other answer. OP isn’t asking about effects of using the stones, in which case Tony obviously has the worst effect. OP is asking about the affects of simply wearing the gauntlet and how that seems to hurt others more than Tony.

    – Notts90
    Apr 30 at 20:06





    You may wish to read the comments on the other answer. OP isn’t asking about effects of using the stones, in which case Tony obviously has the worst effect. OP is asking about the affects of simply wearing the gauntlet and how that seems to hurt others more than Tony.

    – Notts90
    Apr 30 at 20:06











    1














    Hulk was only hurt as bad as he was because he went from 0 to 6 stones immediately. Remember thanos got every stone 1 at a time and had time to acclimate to each stones powers. Also he was using a gauntlet made by earth metals created by tony stark and as bad ass as it looked it wasn't a legendary gauntlet created by itry the dwarf. I believe that having the proper gauntlet alone would have helped and hulk would have been ok. as far as I can tell tony was just desperate and also he had full iron man armor maybe the armor acted as a buffer but who knows.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor



    wizeguy86 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.



















    • Do you have any evidence to back this up?

      – Mat Cauthon
      May 3 at 4:05















    1














    Hulk was only hurt as bad as he was because he went from 0 to 6 stones immediately. Remember thanos got every stone 1 at a time and had time to acclimate to each stones powers. Also he was using a gauntlet made by earth metals created by tony stark and as bad ass as it looked it wasn't a legendary gauntlet created by itry the dwarf. I believe that having the proper gauntlet alone would have helped and hulk would have been ok. as far as I can tell tony was just desperate and also he had full iron man armor maybe the armor acted as a buffer but who knows.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor



    wizeguy86 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.



















    • Do you have any evidence to back this up?

      – Mat Cauthon
      May 3 at 4:05













    1












    1








    1







    Hulk was only hurt as bad as he was because he went from 0 to 6 stones immediately. Remember thanos got every stone 1 at a time and had time to acclimate to each stones powers. Also he was using a gauntlet made by earth metals created by tony stark and as bad ass as it looked it wasn't a legendary gauntlet created by itry the dwarf. I believe that having the proper gauntlet alone would have helped and hulk would have been ok. as far as I can tell tony was just desperate and also he had full iron man armor maybe the armor acted as a buffer but who knows.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor



    wizeguy86 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.









    Hulk was only hurt as bad as he was because he went from 0 to 6 stones immediately. Remember thanos got every stone 1 at a time and had time to acclimate to each stones powers. Also he was using a gauntlet made by earth metals created by tony stark and as bad ass as it looked it wasn't a legendary gauntlet created by itry the dwarf. I believe that having the proper gauntlet alone would have helped and hulk would have been ok. as far as I can tell tony was just desperate and also he had full iron man armor maybe the armor acted as a buffer but who knows.







    share|improve this answer








    New contributor



    wizeguy86 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.








    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer






    New contributor



    wizeguy86 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.








    answered May 3 at 2:17









    wizeguy86wizeguy86

    111




    111




    New contributor



    wizeguy86 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.




    New contributor




    wizeguy86 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.














    • Do you have any evidence to back this up?

      – Mat Cauthon
      May 3 at 4:05

















    • Do you have any evidence to back this up?

      – Mat Cauthon
      May 3 at 4:05
















    Do you have any evidence to back this up?

    – Mat Cauthon
    May 3 at 4:05





    Do you have any evidence to back this up?

    – Mat Cauthon
    May 3 at 4:05











    0














    Like what Hulk said in Endgame the cosmic energy from the Stones is mostly gamma and Hulk is gamma immune to a certain degree if not completely. However Tony is just a regular human being which is why he suffered greater consequences. Despite the difference in their usage of the Stones Tony died even though he did lesser with the Stones because ultimately he is a regular human. So doing virtually anything with all 6 would have killed him.






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor



    monty rafford is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.























      0














      Like what Hulk said in Endgame the cosmic energy from the Stones is mostly gamma and Hulk is gamma immune to a certain degree if not completely. However Tony is just a regular human being which is why he suffered greater consequences. Despite the difference in their usage of the Stones Tony died even though he did lesser with the Stones because ultimately he is a regular human. So doing virtually anything with all 6 would have killed him.






      share|improve this answer










      New contributor



      monty rafford is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





















        0












        0








        0







        Like what Hulk said in Endgame the cosmic energy from the Stones is mostly gamma and Hulk is gamma immune to a certain degree if not completely. However Tony is just a regular human being which is why he suffered greater consequences. Despite the difference in their usage of the Stones Tony died even though he did lesser with the Stones because ultimately he is a regular human. So doing virtually anything with all 6 would have killed him.






        share|improve this answer










        New contributor



        monty rafford is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        Like what Hulk said in Endgame the cosmic energy from the Stones is mostly gamma and Hulk is gamma immune to a certain degree if not completely. However Tony is just a regular human being which is why he suffered greater consequences. Despite the difference in their usage of the Stones Tony died even though he did lesser with the Stones because ultimately he is a regular human. So doing virtually anything with all 6 would have killed him.







        share|improve this answer










        New contributor



        monty rafford is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.








        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 2 days ago









        TheLethalCarrot

        56.1k22334383




        56.1k22334383






        New contributor



        monty rafford is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.








        answered 2 days ago









        monty raffordmonty rafford

        1




        1




        New contributor



        monty rafford is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.




        New contributor




        monty rafford is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f211059%2fwhy-didnt-this-hurt-this-character-as-badly%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Club Baloncesto Breogán Índice Historia | Pavillón | Nome | O Breogán na cultura popular | Xogadores | Adestradores | Presidentes | Palmarés | Historial | Líderes | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióncbbreogan.galCadroGuía oficial da ACB 2009-10, páxina 201Guía oficial ACB 1992, páxina 183. Editorial DB.É de 6.500 espectadores sentados axeitándose á última normativa"Estudiantes Junior, entre as mellores canteiras"o orixinalHemeroteca El Mundo Deportivo, 16 setembro de 1970, páxina 12Historia do BreogánAlfredo Pérez, o último canoneiroHistoria C.B. BreogánHemeroteca de El Mundo DeportivoJimmy Wright, norteamericano do Breogán deixará Lugo por ameazas de morteResultados de Breogán en 1986-87Resultados de Breogán en 1990-91Ficha de Velimir Perasović en acb.comResultados de Breogán en 1994-95Breogán arrasa al Barça. "El Mundo Deportivo", 27 de setembro de 1999, páxina 58CB Breogán - FC BarcelonaA FEB invita a participar nunha nova Liga EuropeaCharlie Bell na prensa estatalMáximos anotadores 2005Tempada 2005-06 : Tódolos Xogadores da Xornada""Non quero pensar nunha man negra, mais pregúntome que está a pasar""o orixinalRaúl López, orgulloso dos xogadores, presume da boa saúde económica do BreogánJulio González confirma que cesa como presidente del BreogánHomenaxe a Lisardo GómezA tempada do rexurdimento celesteEntrevista a Lisardo GómezEl COB dinamita el Pazo para forzar el quinto (69-73)Cafés Candelas, patrocinador del CB Breogán"Suso Lázare, novo presidente do Breogán"o orixinalCafés Candelas Breogán firma el mayor triunfo de la historiaEl Breogán realizará 17 homenajes por su cincuenta aniversario"O Breogán honra ao seu fundador e primeiro presidente"o orixinalMiguel Giao recibiu a homenaxe do PazoHomenaxe aos primeiros gladiadores celestesO home que nos amosa como ver o Breo co corazónTita Franco será homenaxeada polos #50anosdeBreoJulio Vila recibirá unha homenaxe in memoriam polos #50anosdeBreo"O Breogán homenaxeará aos seus aboados máis veteráns"Pechada ovación a «Capi» Sanmartín e Ricardo «Corazón de González»Homenaxe por décadas de informaciónPaco García volve ao Pazo con motivo do 50 aniversario"Resultados y clasificaciones""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, campión da Copa Princesa""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, equipo ACB"C.B. Breogán"Proxecto social"o orixinal"Centros asociados"o orixinalFicha en imdb.comMario Camus trata la recuperación del amor en 'La vieja música', su última película"Páxina web oficial""Club Baloncesto Breogán""C. B. Breogán S.A.D."eehttp://www.fegaba.com

            Vilaño, A Laracha Índice Patrimonio | Lugares e parroquias | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación43°14′52″N 8°36′03″O / 43.24775, -8.60070

            Cegueira Índice Epidemioloxía | Deficiencia visual | Tipos de cegueira | Principais causas de cegueira | Tratamento | Técnicas de adaptación e axudas | Vida dos cegos | Primeiros auxilios | Crenzas respecto das persoas cegas | Crenzas das persoas cegas | O neno deficiente visual | Aspectos psicolóxicos da cegueira | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación54.054.154.436928256blindnessDicionario da Real Academia GalegaPortal das Palabras"International Standards: Visual Standards — Aspects and Ranges of Vision Loss with Emphasis on Population Surveys.""Visual impairment and blindness""Presentan un plan para previr a cegueira"o orixinalACCDV Associació Catalana de Cecs i Disminuïts Visuals - PMFTrachoma"Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis"1844137110.1056/NEJMoa0802268Cans guía - os mellores amigos dos cegosArquivadoEscola de cans guía para cegos en Mortágua, PortugalArquivado"Tecnología para ciegos y deficientes visuales. Recopilación de recursos gratuitos en la Red""Colorino""‘COL.diesis’, escuchar los sonidos del color""COL.diesis: Transforming Colour into Melody and Implementing the Result in a Colour Sensor Device"o orixinal"Sistema de desarrollo de sinestesia color-sonido para invidentes utilizando un protocolo de audio""Enseñanza táctil - geometría y color. Juegos didácticos para niños ciegos y videntes""Sistema Constanz"L'ocupació laboral dels cecs a l'Estat espanyol està pràcticament equiparada a la de les persones amb visió, entrevista amb Pedro ZuritaONCE (Organización Nacional de Cegos de España)Prevención da cegueiraDescrición de deficiencias visuais (Disc@pnet)Braillín, un boneco atractivo para calquera neno, con ou sen discapacidade, que permite familiarizarse co sistema de escritura e lectura brailleAxudas Técnicas36838ID00897494007150-90057129528256DOID:1432HP:0000618D001766C10.597.751.941.162C97109C0155020