Why didn't this hurt this character as badly?What did the Scarlet Witch show the Hulk/Bruce Banner?Why was capturing this character so easy?Why didn't Thanos kill this character?How can Scarlet Witch hold off Thanos?Why didn't this character get involved earlier?Why didn't this character die even though they shot this person in Avengers: Endgame?Do we know what happened to this character in Avengers: Endgame?Can this character be alive?What is this character a reference to?How are the events from Infinity War possible if this character is dead?
In a series of books, what happens after the coming of age?
Make me a minimum magic sum
What's the 2-minute timer on mobile Deutsche Bahn tickets?
Is there an idiom that means that a clothe fits perfectly?
Does this website provide consistent translation into Wookiee?
How do I give a darkroom course without negs from the attendees?
What does “two-bit (jerk)” mean?
What wise choice does Varys intends to make?
Good introductory book to type theory?
Why were the rules for Proliferate changed?
Crime rates in a post-scarcity economy
Did any early RISC OS precursor run on the BBC Micro?
Convert a huge txt-file into a dataset
All of my Firefox add-ons have been disabled suddenly, how can I re-enable them?
Can anyone identify this unknown 1988 PC card from The Palantir Corporation?
While drilling into kitchen wall, hit a wire - any advice?
Do the Zhentarim fire members for killing fellow members?
TikZ/PGF draw algorithm
How could a humanoid creature completely form within the span of 24 hours?
Game artist computer workstation set-up – is this overkill?
How does "politician" work as a job/career?
Function annotation with two or more return parameters
Learning how to read schematics, questions about fractional voltage in schematic
Gift for mentor after his thesis defense?
Why didn't this hurt this character as badly?
What did the Scarlet Witch show the Hulk/Bruce Banner?Why was capturing this character so easy?Why didn't Thanos kill this character?How can Scarlet Witch hold off Thanos?Why didn't this character get involved earlier?Why didn't this character die even though they shot this person in Avengers: Endgame?Do we know what happened to this character in Avengers: Endgame?Can this character be alive?What is this character a reference to?How are the events from Infinity War possible if this character is dead?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
In Avengers: Endgame
Hulk briefly wields all six Infinity Stones in the new gauntlet and screams in pain and is barely able to snap. It's also stated that he was the best fit for the gauntlet.
However
Stark later wields all 6 and while evidently in pain, is still able to snap with little effort and even says "I am Iron Man". While the snap does kill him, it doesn't seem like wielding them hurt him nearly as badly.
Why is this? Adrenaline, desperation, or something else?
marvel marvel-cinematic-universe avengers-endgame
add a comment |
In Avengers: Endgame
Hulk briefly wields all six Infinity Stones in the new gauntlet and screams in pain and is barely able to snap. It's also stated that he was the best fit for the gauntlet.
However
Stark later wields all 6 and while evidently in pain, is still able to snap with little effort and even says "I am Iron Man". While the snap does kill him, it doesn't seem like wielding them hurt him nearly as badly.
Why is this? Adrenaline, desperation, or something else?
marvel marvel-cinematic-universe avengers-endgame
1
I think the snap can kill, not holding the gauntlet.
– Lefteris008
Apr 28 at 16:13
add a comment |
In Avengers: Endgame
Hulk briefly wields all six Infinity Stones in the new gauntlet and screams in pain and is barely able to snap. It's also stated that he was the best fit for the gauntlet.
However
Stark later wields all 6 and while evidently in pain, is still able to snap with little effort and even says "I am Iron Man". While the snap does kill him, it doesn't seem like wielding them hurt him nearly as badly.
Why is this? Adrenaline, desperation, or something else?
marvel marvel-cinematic-universe avengers-endgame
In Avengers: Endgame
Hulk briefly wields all six Infinity Stones in the new gauntlet and screams in pain and is barely able to snap. It's also stated that he was the best fit for the gauntlet.
However
Stark later wields all 6 and while evidently in pain, is still able to snap with little effort and even says "I am Iron Man". While the snap does kill him, it doesn't seem like wielding them hurt him nearly as badly.
Why is this? Adrenaline, desperation, or something else?
marvel marvel-cinematic-universe avengers-endgame
marvel marvel-cinematic-universe avengers-endgame
edited Apr 28 at 16:15
TheLethalCarrot
56.1k22334383
56.1k22334383
asked Apr 28 at 16:07
GremerGremer
565816
565816
1
I think the snap can kill, not holding the gauntlet.
– Lefteris008
Apr 28 at 16:13
add a comment |
1
I think the snap can kill, not holding the gauntlet.
– Lefteris008
Apr 28 at 16:13
1
1
I think the snap can kill, not holding the gauntlet.
– Lefteris008
Apr 28 at 16:13
I think the snap can kill, not holding the gauntlet.
– Lefteris008
Apr 28 at 16:13
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
Hulk took longer and had more pain whilst wielding the Infinity Stones in the Infinity Gauntlet because he was trying to bring Nat back and undo the previous snap by Thanos. Below is the quote from memory so is most certainly incorrect.
Hulk: I tried to bring her back, I couldn’t.
Avengers: Endgame
However, Tony just removed the bad guys of Thanos and his team from 2014 so had less to do.
As we can see the affects of the snap on Hulk were less than they were on Tony who
Dies from it
Whereas Hulk merely has his arm hurt.
It’s also worth noting that Hulk has superhuman healing abilities and so has a higher chance of surviving the Stone’s powers as he would be more resilient that Stark who is a normal, albeit highly intelligent, human.
I guess that's fair. I thought when Hulk was hurt, it wasn't from what he was trying to do, it was because he had all six stones. It had the same burst of energy that went through Thanos in IW and that was what seemed to hurt Hulk. I might be wrong.
– Gremer
Apr 28 at 16:26
6
Also recall that when Thanos used the stones early in Endgame, he was nearly killed by the power necessary for that use. It does seem that what one does with the stones is related to how much power is necessary to perform that act. While Hulk's universe-impacting act required far more power that Tony's field-of-battle impact, Hulk is far more resilient than Tony.
– Rob
Apr 28 at 19:37
1
I'm not asking about why Tony died or anything like that, it's stated in the movie. But it seemed to me like just wearing the stones hurt both Thanos and Hulk. Why wasn't Tony hurt from wearing them?
– Gremer
Apr 28 at 20:28
4
@Gremer If you're asking why Tony didn't suffer immediate consequences upon inserting the stones, I think it must be that his armor protected him. This is also why Tony doesn't experience the same immediate power surge Thanos and Hulk suffer. But he wasn't completely immune: slivers of light start to course through Tony just after he mounts the stones, and there is evidence of the type of skin damage Quill and other mortals suffer when handling a stone. Had he not snapped, I think there's on-screen evidence to suggest he would soon have been consumed by that power despite the armor.
– Rob
Apr 28 at 23:12
2
@Rob Yes, that is exactly what I was trying to ask. Thank you. I guess the armor idea makes sense, but it seems odd given that the other gauntlets were made specifically for the stones. Maybe he saw what happened and his nanobots were stopping the surge or something.
– Gremer
Apr 29 at 2:30
|
show 1 more comment
- It is incorrect that this character wasn't hurt as badly. He had visible damage on the entire side of his body, and later, literally died. I believe that is as much as a character can be hurt!
- The Hulk has regenerative capabilities, so his powers were probably healing while he was trying to not just undo, but try to restore that other thing. Hence he didn't die.
1
You may wish to read the comments on the other answer. OP isn’t asking about effects of using the stones, in which case Tony obviously has the worst effect. OP is asking about the affects of simply wearing the gauntlet and how that seems to hurt others more than Tony.
– Notts90
Apr 30 at 20:06
add a comment |
Hulk was only hurt as bad as he was because he went from 0 to 6 stones immediately. Remember thanos got every stone 1 at a time and had time to acclimate to each stones powers. Also he was using a gauntlet made by earth metals created by tony stark and as bad ass as it looked it wasn't a legendary gauntlet created by itry the dwarf. I believe that having the proper gauntlet alone would have helped and hulk would have been ok. as far as I can tell tony was just desperate and also he had full iron man armor maybe the armor acted as a buffer but who knows.
New contributor
Do you have any evidence to back this up?
– Mat Cauthon
May 3 at 4:05
add a comment |
Like what Hulk said in Endgame the cosmic energy from the Stones is mostly gamma and Hulk is gamma immune to a certain degree if not completely. However Tony is just a regular human being which is why he suffered greater consequences. Despite the difference in their usage of the Stones Tony died even though he did lesser with the Stones because ultimately he is a regular human. So doing virtually anything with all 6 would have killed him.
New contributor
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "186"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f211059%2fwhy-didnt-this-hurt-this-character-as-badly%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Hulk took longer and had more pain whilst wielding the Infinity Stones in the Infinity Gauntlet because he was trying to bring Nat back and undo the previous snap by Thanos. Below is the quote from memory so is most certainly incorrect.
Hulk: I tried to bring her back, I couldn’t.
Avengers: Endgame
However, Tony just removed the bad guys of Thanos and his team from 2014 so had less to do.
As we can see the affects of the snap on Hulk were less than they were on Tony who
Dies from it
Whereas Hulk merely has his arm hurt.
It’s also worth noting that Hulk has superhuman healing abilities and so has a higher chance of surviving the Stone’s powers as he would be more resilient that Stark who is a normal, albeit highly intelligent, human.
I guess that's fair. I thought when Hulk was hurt, it wasn't from what he was trying to do, it was because he had all six stones. It had the same burst of energy that went through Thanos in IW and that was what seemed to hurt Hulk. I might be wrong.
– Gremer
Apr 28 at 16:26
6
Also recall that when Thanos used the stones early in Endgame, he was nearly killed by the power necessary for that use. It does seem that what one does with the stones is related to how much power is necessary to perform that act. While Hulk's universe-impacting act required far more power that Tony's field-of-battle impact, Hulk is far more resilient than Tony.
– Rob
Apr 28 at 19:37
1
I'm not asking about why Tony died or anything like that, it's stated in the movie. But it seemed to me like just wearing the stones hurt both Thanos and Hulk. Why wasn't Tony hurt from wearing them?
– Gremer
Apr 28 at 20:28
4
@Gremer If you're asking why Tony didn't suffer immediate consequences upon inserting the stones, I think it must be that his armor protected him. This is also why Tony doesn't experience the same immediate power surge Thanos and Hulk suffer. But he wasn't completely immune: slivers of light start to course through Tony just after he mounts the stones, and there is evidence of the type of skin damage Quill and other mortals suffer when handling a stone. Had he not snapped, I think there's on-screen evidence to suggest he would soon have been consumed by that power despite the armor.
– Rob
Apr 28 at 23:12
2
@Rob Yes, that is exactly what I was trying to ask. Thank you. I guess the armor idea makes sense, but it seems odd given that the other gauntlets were made specifically for the stones. Maybe he saw what happened and his nanobots were stopping the surge or something.
– Gremer
Apr 29 at 2:30
|
show 1 more comment
Hulk took longer and had more pain whilst wielding the Infinity Stones in the Infinity Gauntlet because he was trying to bring Nat back and undo the previous snap by Thanos. Below is the quote from memory so is most certainly incorrect.
Hulk: I tried to bring her back, I couldn’t.
Avengers: Endgame
However, Tony just removed the bad guys of Thanos and his team from 2014 so had less to do.
As we can see the affects of the snap on Hulk were less than they were on Tony who
Dies from it
Whereas Hulk merely has his arm hurt.
It’s also worth noting that Hulk has superhuman healing abilities and so has a higher chance of surviving the Stone’s powers as he would be more resilient that Stark who is a normal, albeit highly intelligent, human.
I guess that's fair. I thought when Hulk was hurt, it wasn't from what he was trying to do, it was because he had all six stones. It had the same burst of energy that went through Thanos in IW and that was what seemed to hurt Hulk. I might be wrong.
– Gremer
Apr 28 at 16:26
6
Also recall that when Thanos used the stones early in Endgame, he was nearly killed by the power necessary for that use. It does seem that what one does with the stones is related to how much power is necessary to perform that act. While Hulk's universe-impacting act required far more power that Tony's field-of-battle impact, Hulk is far more resilient than Tony.
– Rob
Apr 28 at 19:37
1
I'm not asking about why Tony died or anything like that, it's stated in the movie. But it seemed to me like just wearing the stones hurt both Thanos and Hulk. Why wasn't Tony hurt from wearing them?
– Gremer
Apr 28 at 20:28
4
@Gremer If you're asking why Tony didn't suffer immediate consequences upon inserting the stones, I think it must be that his armor protected him. This is also why Tony doesn't experience the same immediate power surge Thanos and Hulk suffer. But he wasn't completely immune: slivers of light start to course through Tony just after he mounts the stones, and there is evidence of the type of skin damage Quill and other mortals suffer when handling a stone. Had he not snapped, I think there's on-screen evidence to suggest he would soon have been consumed by that power despite the armor.
– Rob
Apr 28 at 23:12
2
@Rob Yes, that is exactly what I was trying to ask. Thank you. I guess the armor idea makes sense, but it seems odd given that the other gauntlets were made specifically for the stones. Maybe he saw what happened and his nanobots were stopping the surge or something.
– Gremer
Apr 29 at 2:30
|
show 1 more comment
Hulk took longer and had more pain whilst wielding the Infinity Stones in the Infinity Gauntlet because he was trying to bring Nat back and undo the previous snap by Thanos. Below is the quote from memory so is most certainly incorrect.
Hulk: I tried to bring her back, I couldn’t.
Avengers: Endgame
However, Tony just removed the bad guys of Thanos and his team from 2014 so had less to do.
As we can see the affects of the snap on Hulk were less than they were on Tony who
Dies from it
Whereas Hulk merely has his arm hurt.
It’s also worth noting that Hulk has superhuman healing abilities and so has a higher chance of surviving the Stone’s powers as he would be more resilient that Stark who is a normal, albeit highly intelligent, human.
Hulk took longer and had more pain whilst wielding the Infinity Stones in the Infinity Gauntlet because he was trying to bring Nat back and undo the previous snap by Thanos. Below is the quote from memory so is most certainly incorrect.
Hulk: I tried to bring her back, I couldn’t.
Avengers: Endgame
However, Tony just removed the bad guys of Thanos and his team from 2014 so had less to do.
As we can see the affects of the snap on Hulk were less than they were on Tony who
Dies from it
Whereas Hulk merely has his arm hurt.
It’s also worth noting that Hulk has superhuman healing abilities and so has a higher chance of surviving the Stone’s powers as he would be more resilient that Stark who is a normal, albeit highly intelligent, human.
edited Apr 28 at 19:41
answered Apr 28 at 16:18
TheLethalCarrotTheLethalCarrot
56.1k22334383
56.1k22334383
I guess that's fair. I thought when Hulk was hurt, it wasn't from what he was trying to do, it was because he had all six stones. It had the same burst of energy that went through Thanos in IW and that was what seemed to hurt Hulk. I might be wrong.
– Gremer
Apr 28 at 16:26
6
Also recall that when Thanos used the stones early in Endgame, he was nearly killed by the power necessary for that use. It does seem that what one does with the stones is related to how much power is necessary to perform that act. While Hulk's universe-impacting act required far more power that Tony's field-of-battle impact, Hulk is far more resilient than Tony.
– Rob
Apr 28 at 19:37
1
I'm not asking about why Tony died or anything like that, it's stated in the movie. But it seemed to me like just wearing the stones hurt both Thanos and Hulk. Why wasn't Tony hurt from wearing them?
– Gremer
Apr 28 at 20:28
4
@Gremer If you're asking why Tony didn't suffer immediate consequences upon inserting the stones, I think it must be that his armor protected him. This is also why Tony doesn't experience the same immediate power surge Thanos and Hulk suffer. But he wasn't completely immune: slivers of light start to course through Tony just after he mounts the stones, and there is evidence of the type of skin damage Quill and other mortals suffer when handling a stone. Had he not snapped, I think there's on-screen evidence to suggest he would soon have been consumed by that power despite the armor.
– Rob
Apr 28 at 23:12
2
@Rob Yes, that is exactly what I was trying to ask. Thank you. I guess the armor idea makes sense, but it seems odd given that the other gauntlets were made specifically for the stones. Maybe he saw what happened and his nanobots were stopping the surge or something.
– Gremer
Apr 29 at 2:30
|
show 1 more comment
I guess that's fair. I thought when Hulk was hurt, it wasn't from what he was trying to do, it was because he had all six stones. It had the same burst of energy that went through Thanos in IW and that was what seemed to hurt Hulk. I might be wrong.
– Gremer
Apr 28 at 16:26
6
Also recall that when Thanos used the stones early in Endgame, he was nearly killed by the power necessary for that use. It does seem that what one does with the stones is related to how much power is necessary to perform that act. While Hulk's universe-impacting act required far more power that Tony's field-of-battle impact, Hulk is far more resilient than Tony.
– Rob
Apr 28 at 19:37
1
I'm not asking about why Tony died or anything like that, it's stated in the movie. But it seemed to me like just wearing the stones hurt both Thanos and Hulk. Why wasn't Tony hurt from wearing them?
– Gremer
Apr 28 at 20:28
4
@Gremer If you're asking why Tony didn't suffer immediate consequences upon inserting the stones, I think it must be that his armor protected him. This is also why Tony doesn't experience the same immediate power surge Thanos and Hulk suffer. But he wasn't completely immune: slivers of light start to course through Tony just after he mounts the stones, and there is evidence of the type of skin damage Quill and other mortals suffer when handling a stone. Had he not snapped, I think there's on-screen evidence to suggest he would soon have been consumed by that power despite the armor.
– Rob
Apr 28 at 23:12
2
@Rob Yes, that is exactly what I was trying to ask. Thank you. I guess the armor idea makes sense, but it seems odd given that the other gauntlets were made specifically for the stones. Maybe he saw what happened and his nanobots were stopping the surge or something.
– Gremer
Apr 29 at 2:30
I guess that's fair. I thought when Hulk was hurt, it wasn't from what he was trying to do, it was because he had all six stones. It had the same burst of energy that went through Thanos in IW and that was what seemed to hurt Hulk. I might be wrong.
– Gremer
Apr 28 at 16:26
I guess that's fair. I thought when Hulk was hurt, it wasn't from what he was trying to do, it was because he had all six stones. It had the same burst of energy that went through Thanos in IW and that was what seemed to hurt Hulk. I might be wrong.
– Gremer
Apr 28 at 16:26
6
6
Also recall that when Thanos used the stones early in Endgame, he was nearly killed by the power necessary for that use. It does seem that what one does with the stones is related to how much power is necessary to perform that act. While Hulk's universe-impacting act required far more power that Tony's field-of-battle impact, Hulk is far more resilient than Tony.
– Rob
Apr 28 at 19:37
Also recall that when Thanos used the stones early in Endgame, he was nearly killed by the power necessary for that use. It does seem that what one does with the stones is related to how much power is necessary to perform that act. While Hulk's universe-impacting act required far more power that Tony's field-of-battle impact, Hulk is far more resilient than Tony.
– Rob
Apr 28 at 19:37
1
1
I'm not asking about why Tony died or anything like that, it's stated in the movie. But it seemed to me like just wearing the stones hurt both Thanos and Hulk. Why wasn't Tony hurt from wearing them?
– Gremer
Apr 28 at 20:28
I'm not asking about why Tony died or anything like that, it's stated in the movie. But it seemed to me like just wearing the stones hurt both Thanos and Hulk. Why wasn't Tony hurt from wearing them?
– Gremer
Apr 28 at 20:28
4
4
@Gremer If you're asking why Tony didn't suffer immediate consequences upon inserting the stones, I think it must be that his armor protected him. This is also why Tony doesn't experience the same immediate power surge Thanos and Hulk suffer. But he wasn't completely immune: slivers of light start to course through Tony just after he mounts the stones, and there is evidence of the type of skin damage Quill and other mortals suffer when handling a stone. Had he not snapped, I think there's on-screen evidence to suggest he would soon have been consumed by that power despite the armor.
– Rob
Apr 28 at 23:12
@Gremer If you're asking why Tony didn't suffer immediate consequences upon inserting the stones, I think it must be that his armor protected him. This is also why Tony doesn't experience the same immediate power surge Thanos and Hulk suffer. But he wasn't completely immune: slivers of light start to course through Tony just after he mounts the stones, and there is evidence of the type of skin damage Quill and other mortals suffer when handling a stone. Had he not snapped, I think there's on-screen evidence to suggest he would soon have been consumed by that power despite the armor.
– Rob
Apr 28 at 23:12
2
2
@Rob Yes, that is exactly what I was trying to ask. Thank you. I guess the armor idea makes sense, but it seems odd given that the other gauntlets were made specifically for the stones. Maybe he saw what happened and his nanobots were stopping the surge or something.
– Gremer
Apr 29 at 2:30
@Rob Yes, that is exactly what I was trying to ask. Thank you. I guess the armor idea makes sense, but it seems odd given that the other gauntlets were made specifically for the stones. Maybe he saw what happened and his nanobots were stopping the surge or something.
– Gremer
Apr 29 at 2:30
|
show 1 more comment
- It is incorrect that this character wasn't hurt as badly. He had visible damage on the entire side of his body, and later, literally died. I believe that is as much as a character can be hurt!
- The Hulk has regenerative capabilities, so his powers were probably healing while he was trying to not just undo, but try to restore that other thing. Hence he didn't die.
1
You may wish to read the comments on the other answer. OP isn’t asking about effects of using the stones, in which case Tony obviously has the worst effect. OP is asking about the affects of simply wearing the gauntlet and how that seems to hurt others more than Tony.
– Notts90
Apr 30 at 20:06
add a comment |
- It is incorrect that this character wasn't hurt as badly. He had visible damage on the entire side of his body, and later, literally died. I believe that is as much as a character can be hurt!
- The Hulk has regenerative capabilities, so his powers were probably healing while he was trying to not just undo, but try to restore that other thing. Hence he didn't die.
1
You may wish to read the comments on the other answer. OP isn’t asking about effects of using the stones, in which case Tony obviously has the worst effect. OP is asking about the affects of simply wearing the gauntlet and how that seems to hurt others more than Tony.
– Notts90
Apr 30 at 20:06
add a comment |
- It is incorrect that this character wasn't hurt as badly. He had visible damage on the entire side of his body, and later, literally died. I believe that is as much as a character can be hurt!
- The Hulk has regenerative capabilities, so his powers were probably healing while he was trying to not just undo, but try to restore that other thing. Hence he didn't die.
- It is incorrect that this character wasn't hurt as badly. He had visible damage on the entire side of his body, and later, literally died. I believe that is as much as a character can be hurt!
- The Hulk has regenerative capabilities, so his powers were probably healing while he was trying to not just undo, but try to restore that other thing. Hence he didn't die.
answered Apr 29 at 7:20
Stark07Stark07
11.8k753101
11.8k753101
1
You may wish to read the comments on the other answer. OP isn’t asking about effects of using the stones, in which case Tony obviously has the worst effect. OP is asking about the affects of simply wearing the gauntlet and how that seems to hurt others more than Tony.
– Notts90
Apr 30 at 20:06
add a comment |
1
You may wish to read the comments on the other answer. OP isn’t asking about effects of using the stones, in which case Tony obviously has the worst effect. OP is asking about the affects of simply wearing the gauntlet and how that seems to hurt others more than Tony.
– Notts90
Apr 30 at 20:06
1
1
You may wish to read the comments on the other answer. OP isn’t asking about effects of using the stones, in which case Tony obviously has the worst effect. OP is asking about the affects of simply wearing the gauntlet and how that seems to hurt others more than Tony.
– Notts90
Apr 30 at 20:06
You may wish to read the comments on the other answer. OP isn’t asking about effects of using the stones, in which case Tony obviously has the worst effect. OP is asking about the affects of simply wearing the gauntlet and how that seems to hurt others more than Tony.
– Notts90
Apr 30 at 20:06
add a comment |
Hulk was only hurt as bad as he was because he went from 0 to 6 stones immediately. Remember thanos got every stone 1 at a time and had time to acclimate to each stones powers. Also he was using a gauntlet made by earth metals created by tony stark and as bad ass as it looked it wasn't a legendary gauntlet created by itry the dwarf. I believe that having the proper gauntlet alone would have helped and hulk would have been ok. as far as I can tell tony was just desperate and also he had full iron man armor maybe the armor acted as a buffer but who knows.
New contributor
Do you have any evidence to back this up?
– Mat Cauthon
May 3 at 4:05
add a comment |
Hulk was only hurt as bad as he was because he went from 0 to 6 stones immediately. Remember thanos got every stone 1 at a time and had time to acclimate to each stones powers. Also he was using a gauntlet made by earth metals created by tony stark and as bad ass as it looked it wasn't a legendary gauntlet created by itry the dwarf. I believe that having the proper gauntlet alone would have helped and hulk would have been ok. as far as I can tell tony was just desperate and also he had full iron man armor maybe the armor acted as a buffer but who knows.
New contributor
Do you have any evidence to back this up?
– Mat Cauthon
May 3 at 4:05
add a comment |
Hulk was only hurt as bad as he was because he went from 0 to 6 stones immediately. Remember thanos got every stone 1 at a time and had time to acclimate to each stones powers. Also he was using a gauntlet made by earth metals created by tony stark and as bad ass as it looked it wasn't a legendary gauntlet created by itry the dwarf. I believe that having the proper gauntlet alone would have helped and hulk would have been ok. as far as I can tell tony was just desperate and also he had full iron man armor maybe the armor acted as a buffer but who knows.
New contributor
Hulk was only hurt as bad as he was because he went from 0 to 6 stones immediately. Remember thanos got every stone 1 at a time and had time to acclimate to each stones powers. Also he was using a gauntlet made by earth metals created by tony stark and as bad ass as it looked it wasn't a legendary gauntlet created by itry the dwarf. I believe that having the proper gauntlet alone would have helped and hulk would have been ok. as far as I can tell tony was just desperate and also he had full iron man armor maybe the armor acted as a buffer but who knows.
New contributor
New contributor
answered May 3 at 2:17
wizeguy86wizeguy86
111
111
New contributor
New contributor
Do you have any evidence to back this up?
– Mat Cauthon
May 3 at 4:05
add a comment |
Do you have any evidence to back this up?
– Mat Cauthon
May 3 at 4:05
Do you have any evidence to back this up?
– Mat Cauthon
May 3 at 4:05
Do you have any evidence to back this up?
– Mat Cauthon
May 3 at 4:05
add a comment |
Like what Hulk said in Endgame the cosmic energy from the Stones is mostly gamma and Hulk is gamma immune to a certain degree if not completely. However Tony is just a regular human being which is why he suffered greater consequences. Despite the difference in their usage of the Stones Tony died even though he did lesser with the Stones because ultimately he is a regular human. So doing virtually anything with all 6 would have killed him.
New contributor
add a comment |
Like what Hulk said in Endgame the cosmic energy from the Stones is mostly gamma and Hulk is gamma immune to a certain degree if not completely. However Tony is just a regular human being which is why he suffered greater consequences. Despite the difference in their usage of the Stones Tony died even though he did lesser with the Stones because ultimately he is a regular human. So doing virtually anything with all 6 would have killed him.
New contributor
add a comment |
Like what Hulk said in Endgame the cosmic energy from the Stones is mostly gamma and Hulk is gamma immune to a certain degree if not completely. However Tony is just a regular human being which is why he suffered greater consequences. Despite the difference in their usage of the Stones Tony died even though he did lesser with the Stones because ultimately he is a regular human. So doing virtually anything with all 6 would have killed him.
New contributor
Like what Hulk said in Endgame the cosmic energy from the Stones is mostly gamma and Hulk is gamma immune to a certain degree if not completely. However Tony is just a regular human being which is why he suffered greater consequences. Despite the difference in their usage of the Stones Tony died even though he did lesser with the Stones because ultimately he is a regular human. So doing virtually anything with all 6 would have killed him.
New contributor
edited 2 days ago
TheLethalCarrot
56.1k22334383
56.1k22334383
New contributor
answered 2 days ago
monty raffordmonty rafford
1
1
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f211059%2fwhy-didnt-this-hurt-this-character-as-badly%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
I think the snap can kill, not holding the gauntlet.
– Lefteris008
Apr 28 at 16:13