Is iperf valid to measure network performance?Expected throughput in Gigabit networkHow to get gigabit network speeds on Windows XP?Measuring network performance between Windows and LinuxDifferent versions of iperf for windows give totally different resultsPoor network performance on Server 2008 machinesNetwork Performance / SMB-CIFS / GuidanceWhy iperf still reports 1Gbps performance when using bonding over two 1Gbps adapters?Simulate massive network trafficWhy the bandwidth is not ~10G?IPERF 2.0.8/2.0.9 in Windows - "connect failed: Connection refused

Why were the rules for Proliferate changed?

Why doesn't a particle exert force on itself?

Is there a reason why Turkey took the Balkan territories of the Ottoman Empire, instead of Greece or another of the Balkan states?

Magical Modulo Squares

Make me a minimum magic sum

shebang or not shebang

A♭ major 9th chord in Bach is unexpectedly dissonant/jazzy

Did any early RISC OS precursor run on the BBC Micro?

How does "politician" work as a job/career?

Explaining intravenous drug abuse to a small child

Extracting the parent, leaf, and extension from a valid path

Gift for mentor after his thesis defense?

An adjective or a noun to describe a very small apartment / house etc

Searching for a sentence that I only know part of it using Google's operators

Translation of "invincible independence"

Saying the right thing then saying the wrong thing toch kedai dibur

A problem with Hebrew and English underlined text

And now you see it

I want to write a blog post building upon someone else's paper, how can I properly cite/credit them?

How do I give a darkroom course without negs from the attendees?

Employee is self-centered and affects the team negatively

Can anyone identify this unknown 1988 PC card from The Palantir Corporation?

The unknown and unexplained in science fiction

How can I finally understand the confusing modal verb "мочь"?



Is iperf valid to measure network performance?


Expected throughput in Gigabit networkHow to get gigabit network speeds on Windows XP?Measuring network performance between Windows and LinuxDifferent versions of iperf for windows give totally different resultsPoor network performance on Server 2008 machinesNetwork Performance / SMB-CIFS / GuidanceWhy iperf still reports 1Gbps performance when using bonding over two 1Gbps adapters?Simulate massive network trafficWhy the bandwidth is not ~10G?IPERF 2.0.8/2.0.9 in Windows - "connect failed: Connection refused






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








1















We are investigating performance issues in one of our software deployment between our application servers (Windows) and our Redis instances (Linux).



On a 10 Gbits/s link single TCP connections can apparently only reach 10 Mbits/s. Opening several TCP connections allows us to reach a higher bandwitch. UDP does not seem to be affected by these limitations and reaches the full speed of the link. This kind-of make us suspect that some network device (firewall, proxy ?) inside the network causes these throughput differences.



We made those measurements using iperf (same version) on both the Windows servers and the Linux one.



Our networking team however, completely discards those result based on the fact that "iperf is not officially supported on Windows and so the results can't be trusted". At the same time, they deny to provide an alternative tool to do those measurements and claim that "the network is fine".



So my question is: can iperf be reliably used to measure TCP and UDP performance between Windows and Linux servers ? If no, which tool would you recommend ?










share|improve this question




























    1















    We are investigating performance issues in one of our software deployment between our application servers (Windows) and our Redis instances (Linux).



    On a 10 Gbits/s link single TCP connections can apparently only reach 10 Mbits/s. Opening several TCP connections allows us to reach a higher bandwitch. UDP does not seem to be affected by these limitations and reaches the full speed of the link. This kind-of make us suspect that some network device (firewall, proxy ?) inside the network causes these throughput differences.



    We made those measurements using iperf (same version) on both the Windows servers and the Linux one.



    Our networking team however, completely discards those result based on the fact that "iperf is not officially supported on Windows and so the results can't be trusted". At the same time, they deny to provide an alternative tool to do those measurements and claim that "the network is fine".



    So my question is: can iperf be reliably used to measure TCP and UDP performance between Windows and Linux servers ? If no, which tool would you recommend ?










    share|improve this question
























      1












      1








      1


      1






      We are investigating performance issues in one of our software deployment between our application servers (Windows) and our Redis instances (Linux).



      On a 10 Gbits/s link single TCP connections can apparently only reach 10 Mbits/s. Opening several TCP connections allows us to reach a higher bandwitch. UDP does not seem to be affected by these limitations and reaches the full speed of the link. This kind-of make us suspect that some network device (firewall, proxy ?) inside the network causes these throughput differences.



      We made those measurements using iperf (same version) on both the Windows servers and the Linux one.



      Our networking team however, completely discards those result based on the fact that "iperf is not officially supported on Windows and so the results can't be trusted". At the same time, they deny to provide an alternative tool to do those measurements and claim that "the network is fine".



      So my question is: can iperf be reliably used to measure TCP and UDP performance between Windows and Linux servers ? If no, which tool would you recommend ?










      share|improve this question














      We are investigating performance issues in one of our software deployment between our application servers (Windows) and our Redis instances (Linux).



      On a 10 Gbits/s link single TCP connections can apparently only reach 10 Mbits/s. Opening several TCP connections allows us to reach a higher bandwitch. UDP does not seem to be affected by these limitations and reaches the full speed of the link. This kind-of make us suspect that some network device (firewall, proxy ?) inside the network causes these throughput differences.



      We made those measurements using iperf (same version) on both the Windows servers and the Linux one.



      Our networking team however, completely discards those result based on the fact that "iperf is not officially supported on Windows and so the results can't be trusted". At the same time, they deny to provide an alternative tool to do those measurements and claim that "the network is fine".



      So my question is: can iperf be reliably used to measure TCP and UDP performance between Windows and Linux servers ? If no, which tool would you recommend ?







      networking bandwidth operating-system iperf






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Aug 19 '15 at 13:55









      ereOnereOn

      4141315




      4141315




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          iperf could be used, I wonder which parameters you were using when 10 Mbps have been reported.



          Another useful tool is Netpipe (available in Linux repos) and for Windows I would recommend using the Java version, available here:



          Information on how to run Netpipe is here available.



          We can help you in identifying the issue with regards to the access to Redis. Which network vendor are you using?






          share|improve this answer






























            0














            iperf is perfectly supported in windows since, at least, 2005.
            Now days you even have different versions for iperf3 in Windows: 32 bits, 64 bits and even UWP versions are available.



            Once you have the same version (and by version I mean build, like v3.1.3 for ex.) of iperf3 in both, client and server, you can test for 10gbps doing the following:




            Server



            iperf3 -s



            Should show an output like:



            ------------------------ 
            Server listening on 5201
            ------------------------



            Client



            iperf3 -P XX -c $server_ip



            Where:



            • "P XX" represents the number of parallel flows

            • "$server_ip" the above server IP

            This should output something along the lines of:



            [SUM] 0.00-10.00 sec 10.9 GBytes 9.30 Gbits/sec sender 
            [SUM] 0.00-10.00 sec 10.8 GBytes 9.28 Gbits/sec receiver


            If you are not getting around that, you might want to try playing around with the TCP Window Size. You can change it from the client side with the -w XXu flag, where XX is the size and u the unit (k, m).



            Another way to test network bandwidth is to serve an http file from one of the ends, and use some kind of download tool that allows parallel streams (wget, filezilla, or almost every download manager). Or run a benhmark tool, but I would stay with iperf, which is usually the default tool for the job for (almost) everyone.






            share|improve this answer























              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "2"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f715272%2fis-iperf-valid-to-measure-network-performance%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              0














              iperf could be used, I wonder which parameters you were using when 10 Mbps have been reported.



              Another useful tool is Netpipe (available in Linux repos) and for Windows I would recommend using the Java version, available here:



              Information on how to run Netpipe is here available.



              We can help you in identifying the issue with regards to the access to Redis. Which network vendor are you using?






              share|improve this answer



























                0














                iperf could be used, I wonder which parameters you were using when 10 Mbps have been reported.



                Another useful tool is Netpipe (available in Linux repos) and for Windows I would recommend using the Java version, available here:



                Information on how to run Netpipe is here available.



                We can help you in identifying the issue with regards to the access to Redis. Which network vendor are you using?






                share|improve this answer

























                  0












                  0








                  0







                  iperf could be used, I wonder which parameters you were using when 10 Mbps have been reported.



                  Another useful tool is Netpipe (available in Linux repos) and for Windows I would recommend using the Java version, available here:



                  Information on how to run Netpipe is here available.



                  We can help you in identifying the issue with regards to the access to Redis. Which network vendor are you using?






                  share|improve this answer













                  iperf could be used, I wonder which parameters you were using when 10 Mbps have been reported.



                  Another useful tool is Netpipe (available in Linux repos) and for Windows I would recommend using the Java version, available here:



                  Information on how to run Netpipe is here available.



                  We can help you in identifying the issue with regards to the access to Redis. Which network vendor are you using?







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Sep 15 '15 at 23:36









                  Guillermo LopezGuillermo Lopez

                  101




                  101























                      0














                      iperf is perfectly supported in windows since, at least, 2005.
                      Now days you even have different versions for iperf3 in Windows: 32 bits, 64 bits and even UWP versions are available.



                      Once you have the same version (and by version I mean build, like v3.1.3 for ex.) of iperf3 in both, client and server, you can test for 10gbps doing the following:




                      Server



                      iperf3 -s



                      Should show an output like:



                      ------------------------ 
                      Server listening on 5201
                      ------------------------



                      Client



                      iperf3 -P XX -c $server_ip



                      Where:



                      • "P XX" represents the number of parallel flows

                      • "$server_ip" the above server IP

                      This should output something along the lines of:



                      [SUM] 0.00-10.00 sec 10.9 GBytes 9.30 Gbits/sec sender 
                      [SUM] 0.00-10.00 sec 10.8 GBytes 9.28 Gbits/sec receiver


                      If you are not getting around that, you might want to try playing around with the TCP Window Size. You can change it from the client side with the -w XXu flag, where XX is the size and u the unit (k, m).



                      Another way to test network bandwidth is to serve an http file from one of the ends, and use some kind of download tool that allows parallel streams (wget, filezilla, or almost every download manager). Or run a benhmark tool, but I would stay with iperf, which is usually the default tool for the job for (almost) everyone.






                      share|improve this answer



























                        0














                        iperf is perfectly supported in windows since, at least, 2005.
                        Now days you even have different versions for iperf3 in Windows: 32 bits, 64 bits and even UWP versions are available.



                        Once you have the same version (and by version I mean build, like v3.1.3 for ex.) of iperf3 in both, client and server, you can test for 10gbps doing the following:




                        Server



                        iperf3 -s



                        Should show an output like:



                        ------------------------ 
                        Server listening on 5201
                        ------------------------



                        Client



                        iperf3 -P XX -c $server_ip



                        Where:



                        • "P XX" represents the number of parallel flows

                        • "$server_ip" the above server IP

                        This should output something along the lines of:



                        [SUM] 0.00-10.00 sec 10.9 GBytes 9.30 Gbits/sec sender 
                        [SUM] 0.00-10.00 sec 10.8 GBytes 9.28 Gbits/sec receiver


                        If you are not getting around that, you might want to try playing around with the TCP Window Size. You can change it from the client side with the -w XXu flag, where XX is the size and u the unit (k, m).



                        Another way to test network bandwidth is to serve an http file from one of the ends, and use some kind of download tool that allows parallel streams (wget, filezilla, or almost every download manager). Or run a benhmark tool, but I would stay with iperf, which is usually the default tool for the job for (almost) everyone.






                        share|improve this answer

























                          0












                          0








                          0







                          iperf is perfectly supported in windows since, at least, 2005.
                          Now days you even have different versions for iperf3 in Windows: 32 bits, 64 bits and even UWP versions are available.



                          Once you have the same version (and by version I mean build, like v3.1.3 for ex.) of iperf3 in both, client and server, you can test for 10gbps doing the following:




                          Server



                          iperf3 -s



                          Should show an output like:



                          ------------------------ 
                          Server listening on 5201
                          ------------------------



                          Client



                          iperf3 -P XX -c $server_ip



                          Where:



                          • "P XX" represents the number of parallel flows

                          • "$server_ip" the above server IP

                          This should output something along the lines of:



                          [SUM] 0.00-10.00 sec 10.9 GBytes 9.30 Gbits/sec sender 
                          [SUM] 0.00-10.00 sec 10.8 GBytes 9.28 Gbits/sec receiver


                          If you are not getting around that, you might want to try playing around with the TCP Window Size. You can change it from the client side with the -w XXu flag, where XX is the size and u the unit (k, m).



                          Another way to test network bandwidth is to serve an http file from one of the ends, and use some kind of download tool that allows parallel streams (wget, filezilla, or almost every download manager). Or run a benhmark tool, but I would stay with iperf, which is usually the default tool for the job for (almost) everyone.






                          share|improve this answer













                          iperf is perfectly supported in windows since, at least, 2005.
                          Now days you even have different versions for iperf3 in Windows: 32 bits, 64 bits and even UWP versions are available.



                          Once you have the same version (and by version I mean build, like v3.1.3 for ex.) of iperf3 in both, client and server, you can test for 10gbps doing the following:




                          Server



                          iperf3 -s



                          Should show an output like:



                          ------------------------ 
                          Server listening on 5201
                          ------------------------



                          Client



                          iperf3 -P XX -c $server_ip



                          Where:



                          • "P XX" represents the number of parallel flows

                          • "$server_ip" the above server IP

                          This should output something along the lines of:



                          [SUM] 0.00-10.00 sec 10.9 GBytes 9.30 Gbits/sec sender 
                          [SUM] 0.00-10.00 sec 10.8 GBytes 9.28 Gbits/sec receiver


                          If you are not getting around that, you might want to try playing around with the TCP Window Size. You can change it from the client side with the -w XXu flag, where XX is the size and u the unit (k, m).



                          Another way to test network bandwidth is to serve an http file from one of the ends, and use some kind of download tool that allows parallel streams (wget, filezilla, or almost every download manager). Or run a benhmark tool, but I would stay with iperf, which is usually the default tool for the job for (almost) everyone.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered May 19 '18 at 6:49









                          LeoLeo

                          1,515415




                          1,515415



























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f715272%2fis-iperf-valid-to-measure-network-performance%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Club Baloncesto Breogán Índice Historia | Pavillón | Nome | O Breogán na cultura popular | Xogadores | Adestradores | Presidentes | Palmarés | Historial | Líderes | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióncbbreogan.galCadroGuía oficial da ACB 2009-10, páxina 201Guía oficial ACB 1992, páxina 183. Editorial DB.É de 6.500 espectadores sentados axeitándose á última normativa"Estudiantes Junior, entre as mellores canteiras"o orixinalHemeroteca El Mundo Deportivo, 16 setembro de 1970, páxina 12Historia do BreogánAlfredo Pérez, o último canoneiroHistoria C.B. BreogánHemeroteca de El Mundo DeportivoJimmy Wright, norteamericano do Breogán deixará Lugo por ameazas de morteResultados de Breogán en 1986-87Resultados de Breogán en 1990-91Ficha de Velimir Perasović en acb.comResultados de Breogán en 1994-95Breogán arrasa al Barça. "El Mundo Deportivo", 27 de setembro de 1999, páxina 58CB Breogán - FC BarcelonaA FEB invita a participar nunha nova Liga EuropeaCharlie Bell na prensa estatalMáximos anotadores 2005Tempada 2005-06 : Tódolos Xogadores da Xornada""Non quero pensar nunha man negra, mais pregúntome que está a pasar""o orixinalRaúl López, orgulloso dos xogadores, presume da boa saúde económica do BreogánJulio González confirma que cesa como presidente del BreogánHomenaxe a Lisardo GómezA tempada do rexurdimento celesteEntrevista a Lisardo GómezEl COB dinamita el Pazo para forzar el quinto (69-73)Cafés Candelas, patrocinador del CB Breogán"Suso Lázare, novo presidente do Breogán"o orixinalCafés Candelas Breogán firma el mayor triunfo de la historiaEl Breogán realizará 17 homenajes por su cincuenta aniversario"O Breogán honra ao seu fundador e primeiro presidente"o orixinalMiguel Giao recibiu a homenaxe do PazoHomenaxe aos primeiros gladiadores celestesO home que nos amosa como ver o Breo co corazónTita Franco será homenaxeada polos #50anosdeBreoJulio Vila recibirá unha homenaxe in memoriam polos #50anosdeBreo"O Breogán homenaxeará aos seus aboados máis veteráns"Pechada ovación a «Capi» Sanmartín e Ricardo «Corazón de González»Homenaxe por décadas de informaciónPaco García volve ao Pazo con motivo do 50 aniversario"Resultados y clasificaciones""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, campión da Copa Princesa""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, equipo ACB"C.B. Breogán"Proxecto social"o orixinal"Centros asociados"o orixinalFicha en imdb.comMario Camus trata la recuperación del amor en 'La vieja música', su última película"Páxina web oficial""Club Baloncesto Breogán""C. B. Breogán S.A.D."eehttp://www.fegaba.com

                              Vilaño, A Laracha Índice Patrimonio | Lugares e parroquias | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación43°14′52″N 8°36′03″O / 43.24775, -8.60070

                              Cegueira Índice Epidemioloxía | Deficiencia visual | Tipos de cegueira | Principais causas de cegueira | Tratamento | Técnicas de adaptación e axudas | Vida dos cegos | Primeiros auxilios | Crenzas respecto das persoas cegas | Crenzas das persoas cegas | O neno deficiente visual | Aspectos psicolóxicos da cegueira | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación54.054.154.436928256blindnessDicionario da Real Academia GalegaPortal das Palabras"International Standards: Visual Standards — Aspects and Ranges of Vision Loss with Emphasis on Population Surveys.""Visual impairment and blindness""Presentan un plan para previr a cegueira"o orixinalACCDV Associació Catalana de Cecs i Disminuïts Visuals - PMFTrachoma"Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis"1844137110.1056/NEJMoa0802268Cans guía - os mellores amigos dos cegosArquivadoEscola de cans guía para cegos en Mortágua, PortugalArquivado"Tecnología para ciegos y deficientes visuales. Recopilación de recursos gratuitos en la Red""Colorino""‘COL.diesis’, escuchar los sonidos del color""COL.diesis: Transforming Colour into Melody and Implementing the Result in a Colour Sensor Device"o orixinal"Sistema de desarrollo de sinestesia color-sonido para invidentes utilizando un protocolo de audio""Enseñanza táctil - geometría y color. Juegos didácticos para niños ciegos y videntes""Sistema Constanz"L'ocupació laboral dels cecs a l'Estat espanyol està pràcticament equiparada a la de les persones amb visió, entrevista amb Pedro ZuritaONCE (Organización Nacional de Cegos de España)Prevención da cegueiraDescrición de deficiencias visuais (Disc@pnet)Braillín, un boneco atractivo para calquera neno, con ou sen discapacidade, que permite familiarizarse co sistema de escritura e lectura brailleAxudas Técnicas36838ID00897494007150-90057129528256DOID:1432HP:0000618D001766C10.597.751.941.162C97109C0155020