Re-sharing a Windows 2012r2 share as read-onlyUseful Command-line Commands on WindowsWhat is the safest way to give anonymous read/write access to Windows file shares?Anonymous file sharing without login window, from Windows 7 server to XP clientsProblems with “Read Only” on a Samba share from Windows machinesWindows clients unable to access Samba share on AD joined Linux box every 7 daysPermanently mount network share without the need for log on? (Windows)Access denied to Samba share from Windows 10Windows tries to access the IPC$ share before the provided oneDisable file locks on a read-only Windows File Sharelinux client can't write to public RedHat share
How to trick the reader into thinking they're following a redshirt instead of the protagonist?
Has there been a multiethnic Star Trek character?
I have a problematic assistant manager, but I can't fire him
Determining fair price for profitable mobile app business
US doctor working in Tripoli wants me to open online account
Fixing obscure 8080 emulator bug?
Non-aqueous eyes?
A strange trigonometric identity
How to safely destroy (a large quantity of) valid checks?
bmatrix: how to align elements' subscripts?
Despite of atoms being mostly vacuum, why are things so rigid around us?
Why does logistic function use e rather than 2?
Extreme flexible working hours: how to get to know people and activities?
Teaching a class likely meant to inflate the GPA of student athletes
Why does the Mishnah use the terms poor person and homeowner when discussing carrying on Shabbat?
Who are the Missing Members of this Noble Family?
Check if three arrays contains the same element
Thread Pool C++ Implementation
Is it legal for a bar bouncer to confiscate a fake ID
Which languages would be most useful in Europe at the end of the 19th century?
Why 1,2 printed by a command in $() is not interpolated?
How is the excise border managed in Ireland?
What is the actual quality of machine translations?
What is the color of artificial intelligence?
Re-sharing a Windows 2012r2 share as read-only
Useful Command-line Commands on WindowsWhat is the safest way to give anonymous read/write access to Windows file shares?Anonymous file sharing without login window, from Windows 7 server to XP clientsProblems with “Read Only” on a Samba share from Windows machinesWindows clients unable to access Samba share on AD joined Linux box every 7 daysPermanently mount network share without the need for log on? (Windows)Access denied to Samba share from Windows 10Windows tries to access the IPC$ share before the provided oneDisable file locks on a read-only Windows File Sharelinux client can't write to public RedHat share
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
Looking for a Windows based solution.
Background:
- A standalone WS 2012R2 located on NETWORK A is sharing a folder with R/W access through a local user.
- A segregated NETWORK B contains user PCs, some joined to NETWORK B’s WS 2019 AD, others configured as standalone.
- NETWORKS A and B are connected via a firewall/router appliance.
Requirements:
- Make the share on the 2012R2 server in NETWORK A available as READ-ONLY to user PCs on NETWORK B.
- Both domain-joined and standalone user PCs on NETWORK B need to have access to the share.
- Guarantee that users’ access is READ-ONLY.
- Users need to be able to launch applications directly from the READ-ONLY share/mapped drive.
Constraints:
- No changes can be made to the Windows 2012R2 server.
- Users should not be able to bypass the RO control and map the share as RW.
Discussion:
Basically we need to either re-share the WS 2012R2 share inside NETWORK B but this time as READ-ONLY, or somehow configure user PCs to map the RW share RO. However, since some user PCs are not domain-joined, we can’t simply let them “see” the external share (requirement 3).
Temporary solution:
A Linux machine CIFS-mounts the WS2012R2 share and exports it as RO using samba. This works, but introduces another platform which is not desirable. Also, it is somewhat slower than a true Windows solution, and reparse points get “lost”.
Attempted so far:
- SMB sharing the SMB share
- mklink /d the share and then exporting the link
- SUBST command
- Various chains of the above 3
- DFS namespaces
- FTP sharing the SMB share (does not work well as a true map)
- NFS sharing the SMB share (windows keeps dereferencing all the way to the network path, resulting in failure)
- Share between a Hyper-V host and a VM
- Building SAMBA on Windows. Got quite far, but still unable to complete the build. Even if it builds, not hopeful that it will work correctly on Windows (unsupported)
- Proxying the requests via a router. No luck so far.
windows active-directory windows-server-2012-r2 cifs windows-server-2019
add a comment |
Looking for a Windows based solution.
Background:
- A standalone WS 2012R2 located on NETWORK A is sharing a folder with R/W access through a local user.
- A segregated NETWORK B contains user PCs, some joined to NETWORK B’s WS 2019 AD, others configured as standalone.
- NETWORKS A and B are connected via a firewall/router appliance.
Requirements:
- Make the share on the 2012R2 server in NETWORK A available as READ-ONLY to user PCs on NETWORK B.
- Both domain-joined and standalone user PCs on NETWORK B need to have access to the share.
- Guarantee that users’ access is READ-ONLY.
- Users need to be able to launch applications directly from the READ-ONLY share/mapped drive.
Constraints:
- No changes can be made to the Windows 2012R2 server.
- Users should not be able to bypass the RO control and map the share as RW.
Discussion:
Basically we need to either re-share the WS 2012R2 share inside NETWORK B but this time as READ-ONLY, or somehow configure user PCs to map the RW share RO. However, since some user PCs are not domain-joined, we can’t simply let them “see” the external share (requirement 3).
Temporary solution:
A Linux machine CIFS-mounts the WS2012R2 share and exports it as RO using samba. This works, but introduces another platform which is not desirable. Also, it is somewhat slower than a true Windows solution, and reparse points get “lost”.
Attempted so far:
- SMB sharing the SMB share
- mklink /d the share and then exporting the link
- SUBST command
- Various chains of the above 3
- DFS namespaces
- FTP sharing the SMB share (does not work well as a true map)
- NFS sharing the SMB share (windows keeps dereferencing all the way to the network path, resulting in failure)
- Share between a Hyper-V host and a VM
- Building SAMBA on Windows. Got quite far, but still unable to complete the build. Even if it builds, not hopeful that it will work correctly on Windows (unsupported)
- Proxying the requests via a router. No luck so far.
windows active-directory windows-server-2012-r2 cifs windows-server-2019
I am still trying the DFS namespace option in different configurations, but these all seem to be providing symbolic links to the source drive, thus I am unable to control permissions from Network B.
– Brent
May 23 at 22:05
add a comment |
Looking for a Windows based solution.
Background:
- A standalone WS 2012R2 located on NETWORK A is sharing a folder with R/W access through a local user.
- A segregated NETWORK B contains user PCs, some joined to NETWORK B’s WS 2019 AD, others configured as standalone.
- NETWORKS A and B are connected via a firewall/router appliance.
Requirements:
- Make the share on the 2012R2 server in NETWORK A available as READ-ONLY to user PCs on NETWORK B.
- Both domain-joined and standalone user PCs on NETWORK B need to have access to the share.
- Guarantee that users’ access is READ-ONLY.
- Users need to be able to launch applications directly from the READ-ONLY share/mapped drive.
Constraints:
- No changes can be made to the Windows 2012R2 server.
- Users should not be able to bypass the RO control and map the share as RW.
Discussion:
Basically we need to either re-share the WS 2012R2 share inside NETWORK B but this time as READ-ONLY, or somehow configure user PCs to map the RW share RO. However, since some user PCs are not domain-joined, we can’t simply let them “see” the external share (requirement 3).
Temporary solution:
A Linux machine CIFS-mounts the WS2012R2 share and exports it as RO using samba. This works, but introduces another platform which is not desirable. Also, it is somewhat slower than a true Windows solution, and reparse points get “lost”.
Attempted so far:
- SMB sharing the SMB share
- mklink /d the share and then exporting the link
- SUBST command
- Various chains of the above 3
- DFS namespaces
- FTP sharing the SMB share (does not work well as a true map)
- NFS sharing the SMB share (windows keeps dereferencing all the way to the network path, resulting in failure)
- Share between a Hyper-V host and a VM
- Building SAMBA on Windows. Got quite far, but still unable to complete the build. Even if it builds, not hopeful that it will work correctly on Windows (unsupported)
- Proxying the requests via a router. No luck so far.
windows active-directory windows-server-2012-r2 cifs windows-server-2019
Looking for a Windows based solution.
Background:
- A standalone WS 2012R2 located on NETWORK A is sharing a folder with R/W access through a local user.
- A segregated NETWORK B contains user PCs, some joined to NETWORK B’s WS 2019 AD, others configured as standalone.
- NETWORKS A and B are connected via a firewall/router appliance.
Requirements:
- Make the share on the 2012R2 server in NETWORK A available as READ-ONLY to user PCs on NETWORK B.
- Both domain-joined and standalone user PCs on NETWORK B need to have access to the share.
- Guarantee that users’ access is READ-ONLY.
- Users need to be able to launch applications directly from the READ-ONLY share/mapped drive.
Constraints:
- No changes can be made to the Windows 2012R2 server.
- Users should not be able to bypass the RO control and map the share as RW.
Discussion:
Basically we need to either re-share the WS 2012R2 share inside NETWORK B but this time as READ-ONLY, or somehow configure user PCs to map the RW share RO. However, since some user PCs are not domain-joined, we can’t simply let them “see” the external share (requirement 3).
Temporary solution:
A Linux machine CIFS-mounts the WS2012R2 share and exports it as RO using samba. This works, but introduces another platform which is not desirable. Also, it is somewhat slower than a true Windows solution, and reparse points get “lost”.
Attempted so far:
- SMB sharing the SMB share
- mklink /d the share and then exporting the link
- SUBST command
- Various chains of the above 3
- DFS namespaces
- FTP sharing the SMB share (does not work well as a true map)
- NFS sharing the SMB share (windows keeps dereferencing all the way to the network path, resulting in failure)
- Share between a Hyper-V host and a VM
- Building SAMBA on Windows. Got quite far, but still unable to complete the build. Even if it builds, not hopeful that it will work correctly on Windows (unsupported)
- Proxying the requests via a router. No luck so far.
windows active-directory windows-server-2012-r2 cifs windows-server-2019
windows active-directory windows-server-2012-r2 cifs windows-server-2019
edited May 23 at 19:52
Brent
asked May 23 at 17:20
BrentBrent
11
11
I am still trying the DFS namespace option in different configurations, but these all seem to be providing symbolic links to the source drive, thus I am unable to control permissions from Network B.
– Brent
May 23 at 22:05
add a comment |
I am still trying the DFS namespace option in different configurations, but these all seem to be providing symbolic links to the source drive, thus I am unable to control permissions from Network B.
– Brent
May 23 at 22:05
I am still trying the DFS namespace option in different configurations, but these all seem to be providing symbolic links to the source drive, thus I am unable to control permissions from Network B.
– Brent
May 23 at 22:05
I am still trying the DFS namespace option in different configurations, but these all seem to be providing symbolic links to the source drive, thus I am unable to control permissions from Network B.
– Brent
May 23 at 22:05
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
The logical way to do it is as your Windows 2012R2 as it's in a workgroup, I would create another local user locally onto that server that is RO. but that break that;
Constraints:
No changes can be made to the Windows 2012R2 server.
Another solution is using another server and sync with DFS, but that 2012R2 would need to be domain joined to have it work. You state it break your rule #3, but it's not true, as you can put the security into the share for both users, one read only and the other RW, that part work, and your PC in a workgroups can have a manually mapped drive using the correct user account to map it.
Thank you, but we can't create another user because we cannot modify the 2012R2 server. Also, DFS replication requires domain membership and here again we cannot modify the 2012R2.
– Brent
May 23 at 19:00
add a comment |
- Ensure Network B PCs have no network access to the current 2012 R2 file server (appropriate firewall rule or switch ACL)
- Setup a robocopy job from the 2012 R2 file server to a new file server (with the /MIR option)
- Create a RO share on the new file server from which a read-only copy of the data can be.
Thank you, 1. Yes we have the ACL set. 2,3. Because of the volume of files on this drive robocopy is not a viable solution. The drive has 10's of millions of files, and a large number are changes throughout the day by the number of users working. The copy would get stale and not usable too often.
– Brent
May 23 at 22:02
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "2"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f968603%2fre-sharing-a-windows-2012r2-share-as-read-only%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The logical way to do it is as your Windows 2012R2 as it's in a workgroup, I would create another local user locally onto that server that is RO. but that break that;
Constraints:
No changes can be made to the Windows 2012R2 server.
Another solution is using another server and sync with DFS, but that 2012R2 would need to be domain joined to have it work. You state it break your rule #3, but it's not true, as you can put the security into the share for both users, one read only and the other RW, that part work, and your PC in a workgroups can have a manually mapped drive using the correct user account to map it.
Thank you, but we can't create another user because we cannot modify the 2012R2 server. Also, DFS replication requires domain membership and here again we cannot modify the 2012R2.
– Brent
May 23 at 19:00
add a comment |
The logical way to do it is as your Windows 2012R2 as it's in a workgroup, I would create another local user locally onto that server that is RO. but that break that;
Constraints:
No changes can be made to the Windows 2012R2 server.
Another solution is using another server and sync with DFS, but that 2012R2 would need to be domain joined to have it work. You state it break your rule #3, but it's not true, as you can put the security into the share for both users, one read only and the other RW, that part work, and your PC in a workgroups can have a manually mapped drive using the correct user account to map it.
Thank you, but we can't create another user because we cannot modify the 2012R2 server. Also, DFS replication requires domain membership and here again we cannot modify the 2012R2.
– Brent
May 23 at 19:00
add a comment |
The logical way to do it is as your Windows 2012R2 as it's in a workgroup, I would create another local user locally onto that server that is RO. but that break that;
Constraints:
No changes can be made to the Windows 2012R2 server.
Another solution is using another server and sync with DFS, but that 2012R2 would need to be domain joined to have it work. You state it break your rule #3, but it's not true, as you can put the security into the share for both users, one read only and the other RW, that part work, and your PC in a workgroups can have a manually mapped drive using the correct user account to map it.
The logical way to do it is as your Windows 2012R2 as it's in a workgroup, I would create another local user locally onto that server that is RO. but that break that;
Constraints:
No changes can be made to the Windows 2012R2 server.
Another solution is using another server and sync with DFS, but that 2012R2 would need to be domain joined to have it work. You state it break your rule #3, but it's not true, as you can put the security into the share for both users, one read only and the other RW, that part work, and your PC in a workgroups can have a manually mapped drive using the correct user account to map it.
answered May 23 at 17:54
yagmoth555♦yagmoth555
12.7k31842
12.7k31842
Thank you, but we can't create another user because we cannot modify the 2012R2 server. Also, DFS replication requires domain membership and here again we cannot modify the 2012R2.
– Brent
May 23 at 19:00
add a comment |
Thank you, but we can't create another user because we cannot modify the 2012R2 server. Also, DFS replication requires domain membership and here again we cannot modify the 2012R2.
– Brent
May 23 at 19:00
Thank you, but we can't create another user because we cannot modify the 2012R2 server. Also, DFS replication requires domain membership and here again we cannot modify the 2012R2.
– Brent
May 23 at 19:00
Thank you, but we can't create another user because we cannot modify the 2012R2 server. Also, DFS replication requires domain membership and here again we cannot modify the 2012R2.
– Brent
May 23 at 19:00
add a comment |
- Ensure Network B PCs have no network access to the current 2012 R2 file server (appropriate firewall rule or switch ACL)
- Setup a robocopy job from the 2012 R2 file server to a new file server (with the /MIR option)
- Create a RO share on the new file server from which a read-only copy of the data can be.
Thank you, 1. Yes we have the ACL set. 2,3. Because of the volume of files on this drive robocopy is not a viable solution. The drive has 10's of millions of files, and a large number are changes throughout the day by the number of users working. The copy would get stale and not usable too often.
– Brent
May 23 at 22:02
add a comment |
- Ensure Network B PCs have no network access to the current 2012 R2 file server (appropriate firewall rule or switch ACL)
- Setup a robocopy job from the 2012 R2 file server to a new file server (with the /MIR option)
- Create a RO share on the new file server from which a read-only copy of the data can be.
Thank you, 1. Yes we have the ACL set. 2,3. Because of the volume of files on this drive robocopy is not a viable solution. The drive has 10's of millions of files, and a large number are changes throughout the day by the number of users working. The copy would get stale and not usable too often.
– Brent
May 23 at 22:02
add a comment |
- Ensure Network B PCs have no network access to the current 2012 R2 file server (appropriate firewall rule or switch ACL)
- Setup a robocopy job from the 2012 R2 file server to a new file server (with the /MIR option)
- Create a RO share on the new file server from which a read-only copy of the data can be.
- Ensure Network B PCs have no network access to the current 2012 R2 file server (appropriate firewall rule or switch ACL)
- Setup a robocopy job from the 2012 R2 file server to a new file server (with the /MIR option)
- Create a RO share on the new file server from which a read-only copy of the data can be.
answered May 23 at 20:55
SemicolonSemicolon
80536
80536
Thank you, 1. Yes we have the ACL set. 2,3. Because of the volume of files on this drive robocopy is not a viable solution. The drive has 10's of millions of files, and a large number are changes throughout the day by the number of users working. The copy would get stale and not usable too often.
– Brent
May 23 at 22:02
add a comment |
Thank you, 1. Yes we have the ACL set. 2,3. Because of the volume of files on this drive robocopy is not a viable solution. The drive has 10's of millions of files, and a large number are changes throughout the day by the number of users working. The copy would get stale and not usable too often.
– Brent
May 23 at 22:02
Thank you, 1. Yes we have the ACL set. 2,3. Because of the volume of files on this drive robocopy is not a viable solution. The drive has 10's of millions of files, and a large number are changes throughout the day by the number of users working. The copy would get stale and not usable too often.
– Brent
May 23 at 22:02
Thank you, 1. Yes we have the ACL set. 2,3. Because of the volume of files on this drive robocopy is not a viable solution. The drive has 10's of millions of files, and a large number are changes throughout the day by the number of users working. The copy would get stale and not usable too often.
– Brent
May 23 at 22:02
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Server Fault!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fserverfault.com%2fquestions%2f968603%2fre-sharing-a-windows-2012r2-share-as-read-only%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I am still trying the DFS namespace option in different configurations, but these all seem to be providing symbolic links to the source drive, thus I am unable to control permissions from Network B.
– Brent
May 23 at 22:05