How can the Zone of Truth spell be defeated without the caster knowing?Which “anti-lie-detection” features actually affect Zone of Truth?Will zone of truth affect the dead?Does a spellcaster know when their spell has no effect due to a save or immunity?How does Mind Blank affect the Zone of Truth spell?Are targets that save against Zone of Truth aware of the spell?How many saves do you roll vs. Zone of Truth?Does the caster of an enchantment spell always know if the spell worked or failed?Is it OP to let Guardian of Faith attack every turn?Is this homebrew Bardic College balanced?Does the Fear spell work with an Oath of Conquest paladin's Aura of Conquest?How does the Antimagic Field spell affect the caster of a Zone of Truth's ability to know whether a target succeeded or failed the save?

How did the Apollo guidance computer handle parity bit errors?

Is throwing dice a stochastic or a deterministic process?

Efficient deletion of specific list entries

Huffman Code in C++

How do I, as a DM, handle a party that decides to set up an ambush in a dungeon?

What word describes the sound of an instrument based on the shape of the waveform of its sound?

In "Avengers: Endgame", what does this name refer to?

Installing Debian 10, upgrade to stable later?

Collision domain question

Was there a dinosaur-counter in the original Jurassic Park movie?

What is the meaning of 「隣のおじいさんは言いました」

How to use awk to extract data from a file based on the content of another file?

Can a player choose to add detail and flavor to their character's spells and abilities?

Transistor gain, what if there is not enough current?

Why are condenser mics so much more expensive than dynamics?

Picking a theme as a discovery writer

My large rocket is still flipping over

Why increasing of the temperature of the objects like wood, paper etc. doesn't fire them?

What does the coin flipping before dying mean?

Given a safe domain, are subdirectories safe as well?

Do quaternary sulfur dications exist?

How is Pauli's exclusion principle still valid in these cases?

How can I finally understand the confusing modal verb "мочь"?

How important are good looking people in a novel/story?



How can the Zone of Truth spell be defeated without the caster knowing?


Which “anti-lie-detection” features actually affect Zone of Truth?Will zone of truth affect the dead?Does a spellcaster know when their spell has no effect due to a save or immunity?How does Mind Blank affect the Zone of Truth spell?Are targets that save against Zone of Truth aware of the spell?How many saves do you roll vs. Zone of Truth?Does the caster of an enchantment spell always know if the spell worked or failed?Is it OP to let Guardian of Faith attack every turn?Is this homebrew Bardic College balanced?Does the Fear spell work with an Oath of Conquest paladin's Aura of Conquest?How does the Antimagic Field spell affect the caster of a Zone of Truth's ability to know whether a target succeeded or failed the save?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








10












$begingroup$


The Zone of Truth spell contains the following clause:




You know whether each creature succeeds or fails on its saving throw.




In a scenario of checking someone's loyalty, any countermeasure that allows you to always succeed your save against this spell will alert the caster that you have succeeded the save. They will keep you in the area of the spell until you succeed, or until it's clear something is stopping you from failing - at which point the caster will tell you to remove whatever that effect is doing this, or have it assumed you are disloyal.



What are all the countermeasures to this spell which:



  1. don't allow the spell to affect you, and

  2. don't alert the caster you're unaffected?

Note that to fulfil (1), answers should avoid "you can lie by telling the truth in a ZoT". A competent interrogator will simply ask direct yes/no questions and assume disloyalty if they are not answered directly.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Is help from allies allowed?
    $endgroup$
    – Szega
    Apr 27 at 15:43










  • $begingroup$
    @Szega sure, if that help fulfils the two conditions specified.
    $endgroup$
    – Vigil
    Apr 29 at 10:30

















10












$begingroup$


The Zone of Truth spell contains the following clause:




You know whether each creature succeeds or fails on its saving throw.




In a scenario of checking someone's loyalty, any countermeasure that allows you to always succeed your save against this spell will alert the caster that you have succeeded the save. They will keep you in the area of the spell until you succeed, or until it's clear something is stopping you from failing - at which point the caster will tell you to remove whatever that effect is doing this, or have it assumed you are disloyal.



What are all the countermeasures to this spell which:



  1. don't allow the spell to affect you, and

  2. don't alert the caster you're unaffected?

Note that to fulfil (1), answers should avoid "you can lie by telling the truth in a ZoT". A competent interrogator will simply ask direct yes/no questions and assume disloyalty if they are not answered directly.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Is help from allies allowed?
    $endgroup$
    – Szega
    Apr 27 at 15:43










  • $begingroup$
    @Szega sure, if that help fulfils the two conditions specified.
    $endgroup$
    – Vigil
    Apr 29 at 10:30













10












10








10





$begingroup$


The Zone of Truth spell contains the following clause:




You know whether each creature succeeds or fails on its saving throw.




In a scenario of checking someone's loyalty, any countermeasure that allows you to always succeed your save against this spell will alert the caster that you have succeeded the save. They will keep you in the area of the spell until you succeed, or until it's clear something is stopping you from failing - at which point the caster will tell you to remove whatever that effect is doing this, or have it assumed you are disloyal.



What are all the countermeasures to this spell which:



  1. don't allow the spell to affect you, and

  2. don't alert the caster you're unaffected?

Note that to fulfil (1), answers should avoid "you can lie by telling the truth in a ZoT". A competent interrogator will simply ask direct yes/no questions and assume disloyalty if they are not answered directly.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




The Zone of Truth spell contains the following clause:




You know whether each creature succeeds or fails on its saving throw.




In a scenario of checking someone's loyalty, any countermeasure that allows you to always succeed your save against this spell will alert the caster that you have succeeded the save. They will keep you in the area of the spell until you succeed, or until it's clear something is stopping you from failing - at which point the caster will tell you to remove whatever that effect is doing this, or have it assumed you are disloyal.



What are all the countermeasures to this spell which:



  1. don't allow the spell to affect you, and

  2. don't alert the caster you're unaffected?

Note that to fulfil (1), answers should avoid "you can lie by telling the truth in a ZoT". A competent interrogator will simply ask direct yes/no questions and assume disloyalty if they are not answered directly.







dnd-5e spells






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 27 at 19:26









V2Blast

28.7k5103174




28.7k5103174










asked Apr 27 at 13:01









VigilVigil

7,2393289




7,2393289







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Is help from allies allowed?
    $endgroup$
    – Szega
    Apr 27 at 15:43










  • $begingroup$
    @Szega sure, if that help fulfils the two conditions specified.
    $endgroup$
    – Vigil
    Apr 29 at 10:30












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Is help from allies allowed?
    $endgroup$
    – Szega
    Apr 27 at 15:43










  • $begingroup$
    @Szega sure, if that help fulfils the two conditions specified.
    $endgroup$
    – Vigil
    Apr 29 at 10:30







2




2




$begingroup$
Is help from allies allowed?
$endgroup$
– Szega
Apr 27 at 15:43




$begingroup$
Is help from allies allowed?
$endgroup$
– Szega
Apr 27 at 15:43












$begingroup$
@Szega sure, if that help fulfils the two conditions specified.
$endgroup$
– Vigil
Apr 29 at 10:30




$begingroup$
@Szega sure, if that help fulfils the two conditions specified.
$endgroup$
– Vigil
Apr 29 at 10:30










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















22












$begingroup$

Mechanically, Zone of Truth can be defeated only by high-level features



As you say, any attempt to resist or evade the effects of Zone of Truth alerts the caster. And in the context of a loyalty test, avoiding the effect is synonymous with admitting disloyalty. The only exceptions to this are a handful of high-level features: the Mastermind Rogue's Soul of Deceit feature (as mentioned in Louis Wasserman's answer) defeats truth-detection magic, and the 8th level spell Glibness provides a similar ability:




[...] no matter what you say, magic that would determine if you are telling the truth indicates that you are being truthful.




Note that while Glibness causes Zone of Truth to read whatever you say as truthful, it doesn't necessarily protect you from being forced to tell the truth. If you intend to use it, you should ask your DM ahead of time how it will work with Zone of Truth to avoid arguments when it actually happens. (In contrast, Soul of Deceit explicitly says you can't be forced to tell the truth by magic, so there is no ambiguity there.)



In any case, unless you have access to features or spells available around 15th-17th level, you'll have to make it through your loyalty test by telling what your character believes to be the truth.



Believe your lies



However, there is at least one small and difficult-to-exploit loophole that doesn't require any powerful abilities: Zone of Truth only prevents a creature from speaking a deliberate lie. If you can manage to believe your lies, you will be able to speak those lies while under the effect of Zone of Truth. For example, if the loyalty question is something like "Are you loyal to the Empire?", then you would be able to answer with a simple "yes" even if you were plotting to assassinate the emperor, as long as you truly and honestly believed that doing so would help the Empire. Obviously, this is a very situational workaround, but I want to emphasize that this is materially different from being evasive or "lying with the truth". This is a case where you give exactly the truthful answer that is expected of you, but for a completely different reason (while praying that you are never asked to elaborate on that reason).



In practice, when you as a player attempt to use this, you should probably expect some push-back from your DM, asking if your character really believes this. This "loophole" has a heavy character focus rather than a mechanical focus, so if you are planning to do this, be prepared with a solidly fleshed-out backstory to justify your honesty. And of course, be willing to accept that a slightly different question might reveal that your interpretation of loyalty differs from that of your interrogators. In the above example, you would not fare well if you were instead asked "Are you loyal to the emperor?"



Unfortunately, I don't have any experience to share of using this "loophole" in an actual game. I'm just pointing out that it's the only loophole I can think of.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 7




    $begingroup$
    I am loyal to the emperor. That's why he must die — he is hurting his own soul by corrupting the path of the gods. As a true patriot I will do whatever it takes to save him from that....
    $endgroup$
    – mattdm
    Apr 27 at 14:48






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    This is also why compartmentalizing information, and selective lies, to your subordinates can be quite effective: fool them well, and they may truly believe in being loyal to some ideals/persons/..., even as they work against them.
    $endgroup$
    – Matthieu M.
    Apr 27 at 17:53






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AllanMills If ZoT is active, being unable to lie is not suspicious, it's expected.
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Thompson
    Apr 28 at 3:54






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @sevenbrokenbricks If the liar is using Glibness, then they must know that ZoT is in play, and they will avoid telling obvious lies even when ordered to, instead pretending that they are unable to lie because of ZoT. The interrogator could detect this ploy by only pretending to cast ZoT, but they would only do that if they already suspected an effect like Glibness was being used. You can keep on layering countermeasures upon countermeasures, but I think that's going quite far beyond the scope of the original question.
    $endgroup$
    – Ryan Thompson
    Apr 28 at 16:53






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    "Your father was seduced by the dark side of the Force. He ceased to be Anakin Skywalker and became Darth Vader. When that happened, the good man who was your father was destroyed. So what I told you was true, from a certain point of view."
    $endgroup$
    – Dave Sherohman
    Apr 29 at 7:50


















13












$begingroup$

The Mastermind archetype for the Rogue class from Xanathar's Guide to Everything has a class feature, Soul of Deceit, which is explicitly about defeating truth magic: it says that you can't be compelled to tell the truth by magic and that magic that determines if you're telling the truth says you are.



This isn't succeeding on the save; it doesn't say anything about a saving throw. I would read the effects as that you make the saving throw as normal, but can ignore the results and lie as you like.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    12












    $begingroup$

    Modify Memory



    Depending on the circumstances and the precise information you need to keep secret, you may able to effectively defeat a Zone of Truth by having your memory modified in advance by an ally using the Modify Memory spell. Affected creatures in a Zone of Truth cannot deliberately lie, but that doesn't mean that whatever they believe to be true actually is. After interrogation, someone surreptitiously casts Remove Curse or Greater Restoration on you and your original memory returns, at which point you presumably mutter "keikaku1 doori".



    Given the restrictions of Modify Memory this works best for concealing knowledge of specific events; the longer ago the events are or the more material you have to cover, the technique swiftly becomes impractical.



    This doesn't strictly meet your constraints since it requires you to actually be affected by Zone of Truth and does not conceal that from the caster, but I am not sure there actually is a reliable way to render oneself immune to the spell without tipping off or having to compromise the caster. Either they know you're passing your saves, or by lack of information they know you're not even making saves and therefore aren't affected.



    1. keikaku means plan






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      I agree that Modify Memory is a potential solution in general. However, in the specific context of a loyalty test, I think that Modify Memory is particularly unsuitable, since "A modified memory doesn't necessarily affect how a creature behaves, particularly if the memory contradicts the creature's natural inclinations, alignment, or beliefs. An illogical modified memory [...] is dismissed, perhaps as a bad dream." There's also the problem that if someone successfully uses Modify Memory to genuinely flip your loyalties, they will also need to restore your memory later.
      $endgroup$
      – Ryan Thompson
      Apr 27 at 14:36






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Now that I think about it, if there's only one interrogator, a better way to use Modify Memory might be to cast it on the interrogator during the interrogation (make sure they use their spell slot on ZoT first, though, or they might spot the inconsistency).
      $endgroup$
      – Ryan Thompson
      Apr 27 at 16:23







    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @RyanThompson: Unless you're a sorcerer with Subtle Spell multiclassed into one of the spells that can cast modify memory, you casting the spell will probably be noticed pretty easily... Plus I imagine most interrogations aren't one-on-one anyway. (Nice Death Note reference, Carcer :P )
      $endgroup$
      – V2Blast
      Apr 27 at 19:28







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @V2Blast Yeah, that's why I said it would only work for a one-on-one interrogation. You can make the target forget you cast the spell, but others will notice it. This is arguably true even with Subtle Spell, since you have to speak to the target to tell them what to remember instead, and that's going to be a challenge to pull off without someone else catching on.
      $endgroup$
      – Ryan Thompson
      Apr 27 at 20:55



















    4












    $begingroup$

    Minor Illusion



    You say yes, they hear no. You told the truth, but defeated the Zone of Truth with a cantrip.



    If you need more certainty of success, just go with a higher level illusion spell.



    Of course, you will need a way to cast it without detection, but I'm sure you can come up with ways given enough prep time.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$




















      3












      $begingroup$

      Get Dominated



      So you cannot speak a deliberate lie?




      deliberate, adj. done consciously and intentionally




      If you are not in control of your own actions, you cannot lie deliberately. You are forced to say what you say. Get an ally (standing outside the spell radius if possible to make sure) to cast dominate person on you and




      take total and precise control of the target. [..] the
      creature takes only the actions you choose, and doesn't
      do anything that you don't allow it to do. (PHB 235)




      You will still roll the saves against the zone of truth and the results will be known by the caster. It is just that this makes no difference regarding what you actually say.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "122"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );













        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f147002%2fhow-can-the-zone-of-truth-spell-be-defeated-without-the-caster-knowing%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        5 Answers
        5






        active

        oldest

        votes








        5 Answers
        5






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        22












        $begingroup$

        Mechanically, Zone of Truth can be defeated only by high-level features



        As you say, any attempt to resist or evade the effects of Zone of Truth alerts the caster. And in the context of a loyalty test, avoiding the effect is synonymous with admitting disloyalty. The only exceptions to this are a handful of high-level features: the Mastermind Rogue's Soul of Deceit feature (as mentioned in Louis Wasserman's answer) defeats truth-detection magic, and the 8th level spell Glibness provides a similar ability:




        [...] no matter what you say, magic that would determine if you are telling the truth indicates that you are being truthful.




        Note that while Glibness causes Zone of Truth to read whatever you say as truthful, it doesn't necessarily protect you from being forced to tell the truth. If you intend to use it, you should ask your DM ahead of time how it will work with Zone of Truth to avoid arguments when it actually happens. (In contrast, Soul of Deceit explicitly says you can't be forced to tell the truth by magic, so there is no ambiguity there.)



        In any case, unless you have access to features or spells available around 15th-17th level, you'll have to make it through your loyalty test by telling what your character believes to be the truth.



        Believe your lies



        However, there is at least one small and difficult-to-exploit loophole that doesn't require any powerful abilities: Zone of Truth only prevents a creature from speaking a deliberate lie. If you can manage to believe your lies, you will be able to speak those lies while under the effect of Zone of Truth. For example, if the loyalty question is something like "Are you loyal to the Empire?", then you would be able to answer with a simple "yes" even if you were plotting to assassinate the emperor, as long as you truly and honestly believed that doing so would help the Empire. Obviously, this is a very situational workaround, but I want to emphasize that this is materially different from being evasive or "lying with the truth". This is a case where you give exactly the truthful answer that is expected of you, but for a completely different reason (while praying that you are never asked to elaborate on that reason).



        In practice, when you as a player attempt to use this, you should probably expect some push-back from your DM, asking if your character really believes this. This "loophole" has a heavy character focus rather than a mechanical focus, so if you are planning to do this, be prepared with a solidly fleshed-out backstory to justify your honesty. And of course, be willing to accept that a slightly different question might reveal that your interpretation of loyalty differs from that of your interrogators. In the above example, you would not fare well if you were instead asked "Are you loyal to the emperor?"



        Unfortunately, I don't have any experience to share of using this "loophole" in an actual game. I'm just pointing out that it's the only loophole I can think of.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$








        • 7




          $begingroup$
          I am loyal to the emperor. That's why he must die — he is hurting his own soul by corrupting the path of the gods. As a true patriot I will do whatever it takes to save him from that....
          $endgroup$
          – mattdm
          Apr 27 at 14:48






        • 4




          $begingroup$
          This is also why compartmentalizing information, and selective lies, to your subordinates can be quite effective: fool them well, and they may truly believe in being loyal to some ideals/persons/..., even as they work against them.
          $endgroup$
          – Matthieu M.
          Apr 27 at 17:53






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          @AllanMills If ZoT is active, being unable to lie is not suspicious, it's expected.
          $endgroup$
          – Ryan Thompson
          Apr 28 at 3:54






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          @sevenbrokenbricks If the liar is using Glibness, then they must know that ZoT is in play, and they will avoid telling obvious lies even when ordered to, instead pretending that they are unable to lie because of ZoT. The interrogator could detect this ploy by only pretending to cast ZoT, but they would only do that if they already suspected an effect like Glibness was being used. You can keep on layering countermeasures upon countermeasures, but I think that's going quite far beyond the scope of the original question.
          $endgroup$
          – Ryan Thompson
          Apr 28 at 16:53






        • 2




          $begingroup$
          "Your father was seduced by the dark side of the Force. He ceased to be Anakin Skywalker and became Darth Vader. When that happened, the good man who was your father was destroyed. So what I told you was true, from a certain point of view."
          $endgroup$
          – Dave Sherohman
          Apr 29 at 7:50















        22












        $begingroup$

        Mechanically, Zone of Truth can be defeated only by high-level features



        As you say, any attempt to resist or evade the effects of Zone of Truth alerts the caster. And in the context of a loyalty test, avoiding the effect is synonymous with admitting disloyalty. The only exceptions to this are a handful of high-level features: the Mastermind Rogue's Soul of Deceit feature (as mentioned in Louis Wasserman's answer) defeats truth-detection magic, and the 8th level spell Glibness provides a similar ability:




        [...] no matter what you say, magic that would determine if you are telling the truth indicates that you are being truthful.




        Note that while Glibness causes Zone of Truth to read whatever you say as truthful, it doesn't necessarily protect you from being forced to tell the truth. If you intend to use it, you should ask your DM ahead of time how it will work with Zone of Truth to avoid arguments when it actually happens. (In contrast, Soul of Deceit explicitly says you can't be forced to tell the truth by magic, so there is no ambiguity there.)



        In any case, unless you have access to features or spells available around 15th-17th level, you'll have to make it through your loyalty test by telling what your character believes to be the truth.



        Believe your lies



        However, there is at least one small and difficult-to-exploit loophole that doesn't require any powerful abilities: Zone of Truth only prevents a creature from speaking a deliberate lie. If you can manage to believe your lies, you will be able to speak those lies while under the effect of Zone of Truth. For example, if the loyalty question is something like "Are you loyal to the Empire?", then you would be able to answer with a simple "yes" even if you were plotting to assassinate the emperor, as long as you truly and honestly believed that doing so would help the Empire. Obviously, this is a very situational workaround, but I want to emphasize that this is materially different from being evasive or "lying with the truth". This is a case where you give exactly the truthful answer that is expected of you, but for a completely different reason (while praying that you are never asked to elaborate on that reason).



        In practice, when you as a player attempt to use this, you should probably expect some push-back from your DM, asking if your character really believes this. This "loophole" has a heavy character focus rather than a mechanical focus, so if you are planning to do this, be prepared with a solidly fleshed-out backstory to justify your honesty. And of course, be willing to accept that a slightly different question might reveal that your interpretation of loyalty differs from that of your interrogators. In the above example, you would not fare well if you were instead asked "Are you loyal to the emperor?"



        Unfortunately, I don't have any experience to share of using this "loophole" in an actual game. I'm just pointing out that it's the only loophole I can think of.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$








        • 7




          $begingroup$
          I am loyal to the emperor. That's why he must die — he is hurting his own soul by corrupting the path of the gods. As a true patriot I will do whatever it takes to save him from that....
          $endgroup$
          – mattdm
          Apr 27 at 14:48






        • 4




          $begingroup$
          This is also why compartmentalizing information, and selective lies, to your subordinates can be quite effective: fool them well, and they may truly believe in being loyal to some ideals/persons/..., even as they work against them.
          $endgroup$
          – Matthieu M.
          Apr 27 at 17:53






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          @AllanMills If ZoT is active, being unable to lie is not suspicious, it's expected.
          $endgroup$
          – Ryan Thompson
          Apr 28 at 3:54






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          @sevenbrokenbricks If the liar is using Glibness, then they must know that ZoT is in play, and they will avoid telling obvious lies even when ordered to, instead pretending that they are unable to lie because of ZoT. The interrogator could detect this ploy by only pretending to cast ZoT, but they would only do that if they already suspected an effect like Glibness was being used. You can keep on layering countermeasures upon countermeasures, but I think that's going quite far beyond the scope of the original question.
          $endgroup$
          – Ryan Thompson
          Apr 28 at 16:53






        • 2




          $begingroup$
          "Your father was seduced by the dark side of the Force. He ceased to be Anakin Skywalker and became Darth Vader. When that happened, the good man who was your father was destroyed. So what I told you was true, from a certain point of view."
          $endgroup$
          – Dave Sherohman
          Apr 29 at 7:50













        22












        22








        22





        $begingroup$

        Mechanically, Zone of Truth can be defeated only by high-level features



        As you say, any attempt to resist or evade the effects of Zone of Truth alerts the caster. And in the context of a loyalty test, avoiding the effect is synonymous with admitting disloyalty. The only exceptions to this are a handful of high-level features: the Mastermind Rogue's Soul of Deceit feature (as mentioned in Louis Wasserman's answer) defeats truth-detection magic, and the 8th level spell Glibness provides a similar ability:




        [...] no matter what you say, magic that would determine if you are telling the truth indicates that you are being truthful.




        Note that while Glibness causes Zone of Truth to read whatever you say as truthful, it doesn't necessarily protect you from being forced to tell the truth. If you intend to use it, you should ask your DM ahead of time how it will work with Zone of Truth to avoid arguments when it actually happens. (In contrast, Soul of Deceit explicitly says you can't be forced to tell the truth by magic, so there is no ambiguity there.)



        In any case, unless you have access to features or spells available around 15th-17th level, you'll have to make it through your loyalty test by telling what your character believes to be the truth.



        Believe your lies



        However, there is at least one small and difficult-to-exploit loophole that doesn't require any powerful abilities: Zone of Truth only prevents a creature from speaking a deliberate lie. If you can manage to believe your lies, you will be able to speak those lies while under the effect of Zone of Truth. For example, if the loyalty question is something like "Are you loyal to the Empire?", then you would be able to answer with a simple "yes" even if you were plotting to assassinate the emperor, as long as you truly and honestly believed that doing so would help the Empire. Obviously, this is a very situational workaround, but I want to emphasize that this is materially different from being evasive or "lying with the truth". This is a case where you give exactly the truthful answer that is expected of you, but for a completely different reason (while praying that you are never asked to elaborate on that reason).



        In practice, when you as a player attempt to use this, you should probably expect some push-back from your DM, asking if your character really believes this. This "loophole" has a heavy character focus rather than a mechanical focus, so if you are planning to do this, be prepared with a solidly fleshed-out backstory to justify your honesty. And of course, be willing to accept that a slightly different question might reveal that your interpretation of loyalty differs from that of your interrogators. In the above example, you would not fare well if you were instead asked "Are you loyal to the emperor?"



        Unfortunately, I don't have any experience to share of using this "loophole" in an actual game. I'm just pointing out that it's the only loophole I can think of.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Mechanically, Zone of Truth can be defeated only by high-level features



        As you say, any attempt to resist or evade the effects of Zone of Truth alerts the caster. And in the context of a loyalty test, avoiding the effect is synonymous with admitting disloyalty. The only exceptions to this are a handful of high-level features: the Mastermind Rogue's Soul of Deceit feature (as mentioned in Louis Wasserman's answer) defeats truth-detection magic, and the 8th level spell Glibness provides a similar ability:




        [...] no matter what you say, magic that would determine if you are telling the truth indicates that you are being truthful.




        Note that while Glibness causes Zone of Truth to read whatever you say as truthful, it doesn't necessarily protect you from being forced to tell the truth. If you intend to use it, you should ask your DM ahead of time how it will work with Zone of Truth to avoid arguments when it actually happens. (In contrast, Soul of Deceit explicitly says you can't be forced to tell the truth by magic, so there is no ambiguity there.)



        In any case, unless you have access to features or spells available around 15th-17th level, you'll have to make it through your loyalty test by telling what your character believes to be the truth.



        Believe your lies



        However, there is at least one small and difficult-to-exploit loophole that doesn't require any powerful abilities: Zone of Truth only prevents a creature from speaking a deliberate lie. If you can manage to believe your lies, you will be able to speak those lies while under the effect of Zone of Truth. For example, if the loyalty question is something like "Are you loyal to the Empire?", then you would be able to answer with a simple "yes" even if you were plotting to assassinate the emperor, as long as you truly and honestly believed that doing so would help the Empire. Obviously, this is a very situational workaround, but I want to emphasize that this is materially different from being evasive or "lying with the truth". This is a case where you give exactly the truthful answer that is expected of you, but for a completely different reason (while praying that you are never asked to elaborate on that reason).



        In practice, when you as a player attempt to use this, you should probably expect some push-back from your DM, asking if your character really believes this. This "loophole" has a heavy character focus rather than a mechanical focus, so if you are planning to do this, be prepared with a solidly fleshed-out backstory to justify your honesty. And of course, be willing to accept that a slightly different question might reveal that your interpretation of loyalty differs from that of your interrogators. In the above example, you would not fare well if you were instead asked "Are you loyal to the emperor?"



        Unfortunately, I don't have any experience to share of using this "loophole" in an actual game. I'm just pointing out that it's the only loophole I can think of.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Apr 27 at 18:29

























        answered Apr 27 at 14:18









        Ryan ThompsonRyan Thompson

        13.5k246103




        13.5k246103







        • 7




          $begingroup$
          I am loyal to the emperor. That's why he must die — he is hurting his own soul by corrupting the path of the gods. As a true patriot I will do whatever it takes to save him from that....
          $endgroup$
          – mattdm
          Apr 27 at 14:48






        • 4




          $begingroup$
          This is also why compartmentalizing information, and selective lies, to your subordinates can be quite effective: fool them well, and they may truly believe in being loyal to some ideals/persons/..., even as they work against them.
          $endgroup$
          – Matthieu M.
          Apr 27 at 17:53






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          @AllanMills If ZoT is active, being unable to lie is not suspicious, it's expected.
          $endgroup$
          – Ryan Thompson
          Apr 28 at 3:54






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          @sevenbrokenbricks If the liar is using Glibness, then they must know that ZoT is in play, and they will avoid telling obvious lies even when ordered to, instead pretending that they are unable to lie because of ZoT. The interrogator could detect this ploy by only pretending to cast ZoT, but they would only do that if they already suspected an effect like Glibness was being used. You can keep on layering countermeasures upon countermeasures, but I think that's going quite far beyond the scope of the original question.
          $endgroup$
          – Ryan Thompson
          Apr 28 at 16:53






        • 2




          $begingroup$
          "Your father was seduced by the dark side of the Force. He ceased to be Anakin Skywalker and became Darth Vader. When that happened, the good man who was your father was destroyed. So what I told you was true, from a certain point of view."
          $endgroup$
          – Dave Sherohman
          Apr 29 at 7:50












        • 7




          $begingroup$
          I am loyal to the emperor. That's why he must die — he is hurting his own soul by corrupting the path of the gods. As a true patriot I will do whatever it takes to save him from that....
          $endgroup$
          – mattdm
          Apr 27 at 14:48






        • 4




          $begingroup$
          This is also why compartmentalizing information, and selective lies, to your subordinates can be quite effective: fool them well, and they may truly believe in being loyal to some ideals/persons/..., even as they work against them.
          $endgroup$
          – Matthieu M.
          Apr 27 at 17:53






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          @AllanMills If ZoT is active, being unable to lie is not suspicious, it's expected.
          $endgroup$
          – Ryan Thompson
          Apr 28 at 3:54






        • 1




          $begingroup$
          @sevenbrokenbricks If the liar is using Glibness, then they must know that ZoT is in play, and they will avoid telling obvious lies even when ordered to, instead pretending that they are unable to lie because of ZoT. The interrogator could detect this ploy by only pretending to cast ZoT, but they would only do that if they already suspected an effect like Glibness was being used. You can keep on layering countermeasures upon countermeasures, but I think that's going quite far beyond the scope of the original question.
          $endgroup$
          – Ryan Thompson
          Apr 28 at 16:53






        • 2




          $begingroup$
          "Your father was seduced by the dark side of the Force. He ceased to be Anakin Skywalker and became Darth Vader. When that happened, the good man who was your father was destroyed. So what I told you was true, from a certain point of view."
          $endgroup$
          – Dave Sherohman
          Apr 29 at 7:50







        7




        7




        $begingroup$
        I am loyal to the emperor. That's why he must die — he is hurting his own soul by corrupting the path of the gods. As a true patriot I will do whatever it takes to save him from that....
        $endgroup$
        – mattdm
        Apr 27 at 14:48




        $begingroup$
        I am loyal to the emperor. That's why he must die — he is hurting his own soul by corrupting the path of the gods. As a true patriot I will do whatever it takes to save him from that....
        $endgroup$
        – mattdm
        Apr 27 at 14:48




        4




        4




        $begingroup$
        This is also why compartmentalizing information, and selective lies, to your subordinates can be quite effective: fool them well, and they may truly believe in being loyal to some ideals/persons/..., even as they work against them.
        $endgroup$
        – Matthieu M.
        Apr 27 at 17:53




        $begingroup$
        This is also why compartmentalizing information, and selective lies, to your subordinates can be quite effective: fool them well, and they may truly believe in being loyal to some ideals/persons/..., even as they work against them.
        $endgroup$
        – Matthieu M.
        Apr 27 at 17:53




        1




        1




        $begingroup$
        @AllanMills If ZoT is active, being unable to lie is not suspicious, it's expected.
        $endgroup$
        – Ryan Thompson
        Apr 28 at 3:54




        $begingroup$
        @AllanMills If ZoT is active, being unable to lie is not suspicious, it's expected.
        $endgroup$
        – Ryan Thompson
        Apr 28 at 3:54




        1




        1




        $begingroup$
        @sevenbrokenbricks If the liar is using Glibness, then they must know that ZoT is in play, and they will avoid telling obvious lies even when ordered to, instead pretending that they are unable to lie because of ZoT. The interrogator could detect this ploy by only pretending to cast ZoT, but they would only do that if they already suspected an effect like Glibness was being used. You can keep on layering countermeasures upon countermeasures, but I think that's going quite far beyond the scope of the original question.
        $endgroup$
        – Ryan Thompson
        Apr 28 at 16:53




        $begingroup$
        @sevenbrokenbricks If the liar is using Glibness, then they must know that ZoT is in play, and they will avoid telling obvious lies even when ordered to, instead pretending that they are unable to lie because of ZoT. The interrogator could detect this ploy by only pretending to cast ZoT, but they would only do that if they already suspected an effect like Glibness was being used. You can keep on layering countermeasures upon countermeasures, but I think that's going quite far beyond the scope of the original question.
        $endgroup$
        – Ryan Thompson
        Apr 28 at 16:53




        2




        2




        $begingroup$
        "Your father was seduced by the dark side of the Force. He ceased to be Anakin Skywalker and became Darth Vader. When that happened, the good man who was your father was destroyed. So what I told you was true, from a certain point of view."
        $endgroup$
        – Dave Sherohman
        Apr 29 at 7:50




        $begingroup$
        "Your father was seduced by the dark side of the Force. He ceased to be Anakin Skywalker and became Darth Vader. When that happened, the good man who was your father was destroyed. So what I told you was true, from a certain point of view."
        $endgroup$
        – Dave Sherohman
        Apr 29 at 7:50













        13












        $begingroup$

        The Mastermind archetype for the Rogue class from Xanathar's Guide to Everything has a class feature, Soul of Deceit, which is explicitly about defeating truth magic: it says that you can't be compelled to tell the truth by magic and that magic that determines if you're telling the truth says you are.



        This isn't succeeding on the save; it doesn't say anything about a saving throw. I would read the effects as that you make the saving throw as normal, but can ignore the results and lie as you like.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$

















          13












          $begingroup$

          The Mastermind archetype for the Rogue class from Xanathar's Guide to Everything has a class feature, Soul of Deceit, which is explicitly about defeating truth magic: it says that you can't be compelled to tell the truth by magic and that magic that determines if you're telling the truth says you are.



          This isn't succeeding on the save; it doesn't say anything about a saving throw. I would read the effects as that you make the saving throw as normal, but can ignore the results and lie as you like.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$















            13












            13








            13





            $begingroup$

            The Mastermind archetype for the Rogue class from Xanathar's Guide to Everything has a class feature, Soul of Deceit, which is explicitly about defeating truth magic: it says that you can't be compelled to tell the truth by magic and that magic that determines if you're telling the truth says you are.



            This isn't succeeding on the save; it doesn't say anything about a saving throw. I would read the effects as that you make the saving throw as normal, but can ignore the results and lie as you like.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            The Mastermind archetype for the Rogue class from Xanathar's Guide to Everything has a class feature, Soul of Deceit, which is explicitly about defeating truth magic: it says that you can't be compelled to tell the truth by magic and that magic that determines if you're telling the truth says you are.



            This isn't succeeding on the save; it doesn't say anything about a saving throw. I would read the effects as that you make the saving throw as normal, but can ignore the results and lie as you like.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Apr 27 at 17:03

























            answered Apr 27 at 16:51









            Louis WassermanLouis Wasserman

            1,062115




            1,062115





















                12












                $begingroup$

                Modify Memory



                Depending on the circumstances and the precise information you need to keep secret, you may able to effectively defeat a Zone of Truth by having your memory modified in advance by an ally using the Modify Memory spell. Affected creatures in a Zone of Truth cannot deliberately lie, but that doesn't mean that whatever they believe to be true actually is. After interrogation, someone surreptitiously casts Remove Curse or Greater Restoration on you and your original memory returns, at which point you presumably mutter "keikaku1 doori".



                Given the restrictions of Modify Memory this works best for concealing knowledge of specific events; the longer ago the events are or the more material you have to cover, the technique swiftly becomes impractical.



                This doesn't strictly meet your constraints since it requires you to actually be affected by Zone of Truth and does not conceal that from the caster, but I am not sure there actually is a reliable way to render oneself immune to the spell without tipping off or having to compromise the caster. Either they know you're passing your saves, or by lack of information they know you're not even making saves and therefore aren't affected.



                1. keikaku means plan






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$












                • $begingroup$
                  I agree that Modify Memory is a potential solution in general. However, in the specific context of a loyalty test, I think that Modify Memory is particularly unsuitable, since "A modified memory doesn't necessarily affect how a creature behaves, particularly if the memory contradicts the creature's natural inclinations, alignment, or beliefs. An illogical modified memory [...] is dismissed, perhaps as a bad dream." There's also the problem that if someone successfully uses Modify Memory to genuinely flip your loyalties, they will also need to restore your memory later.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Ryan Thompson
                  Apr 27 at 14:36






                • 2




                  $begingroup$
                  Now that I think about it, if there's only one interrogator, a better way to use Modify Memory might be to cast it on the interrogator during the interrogation (make sure they use their spell slot on ZoT first, though, or they might spot the inconsistency).
                  $endgroup$
                  – Ryan Thompson
                  Apr 27 at 16:23







                • 2




                  $begingroup$
                  @RyanThompson: Unless you're a sorcerer with Subtle Spell multiclassed into one of the spells that can cast modify memory, you casting the spell will probably be noticed pretty easily... Plus I imagine most interrogations aren't one-on-one anyway. (Nice Death Note reference, Carcer :P )
                  $endgroup$
                  – V2Blast
                  Apr 27 at 19:28







                • 1




                  $begingroup$
                  @V2Blast Yeah, that's why I said it would only work for a one-on-one interrogation. You can make the target forget you cast the spell, but others will notice it. This is arguably true even with Subtle Spell, since you have to speak to the target to tell them what to remember instead, and that's going to be a challenge to pull off without someone else catching on.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Ryan Thompson
                  Apr 27 at 20:55
















                12












                $begingroup$

                Modify Memory



                Depending on the circumstances and the precise information you need to keep secret, you may able to effectively defeat a Zone of Truth by having your memory modified in advance by an ally using the Modify Memory spell. Affected creatures in a Zone of Truth cannot deliberately lie, but that doesn't mean that whatever they believe to be true actually is. After interrogation, someone surreptitiously casts Remove Curse or Greater Restoration on you and your original memory returns, at which point you presumably mutter "keikaku1 doori".



                Given the restrictions of Modify Memory this works best for concealing knowledge of specific events; the longer ago the events are or the more material you have to cover, the technique swiftly becomes impractical.



                This doesn't strictly meet your constraints since it requires you to actually be affected by Zone of Truth and does not conceal that from the caster, but I am not sure there actually is a reliable way to render oneself immune to the spell without tipping off or having to compromise the caster. Either they know you're passing your saves, or by lack of information they know you're not even making saves and therefore aren't affected.



                1. keikaku means plan






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$












                • $begingroup$
                  I agree that Modify Memory is a potential solution in general. However, in the specific context of a loyalty test, I think that Modify Memory is particularly unsuitable, since "A modified memory doesn't necessarily affect how a creature behaves, particularly if the memory contradicts the creature's natural inclinations, alignment, or beliefs. An illogical modified memory [...] is dismissed, perhaps as a bad dream." There's also the problem that if someone successfully uses Modify Memory to genuinely flip your loyalties, they will also need to restore your memory later.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Ryan Thompson
                  Apr 27 at 14:36






                • 2




                  $begingroup$
                  Now that I think about it, if there's only one interrogator, a better way to use Modify Memory might be to cast it on the interrogator during the interrogation (make sure they use their spell slot on ZoT first, though, or they might spot the inconsistency).
                  $endgroup$
                  – Ryan Thompson
                  Apr 27 at 16:23







                • 2




                  $begingroup$
                  @RyanThompson: Unless you're a sorcerer with Subtle Spell multiclassed into one of the spells that can cast modify memory, you casting the spell will probably be noticed pretty easily... Plus I imagine most interrogations aren't one-on-one anyway. (Nice Death Note reference, Carcer :P )
                  $endgroup$
                  – V2Blast
                  Apr 27 at 19:28







                • 1




                  $begingroup$
                  @V2Blast Yeah, that's why I said it would only work for a one-on-one interrogation. You can make the target forget you cast the spell, but others will notice it. This is arguably true even with Subtle Spell, since you have to speak to the target to tell them what to remember instead, and that's going to be a challenge to pull off without someone else catching on.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Ryan Thompson
                  Apr 27 at 20:55














                12












                12








                12





                $begingroup$

                Modify Memory



                Depending on the circumstances and the precise information you need to keep secret, you may able to effectively defeat a Zone of Truth by having your memory modified in advance by an ally using the Modify Memory spell. Affected creatures in a Zone of Truth cannot deliberately lie, but that doesn't mean that whatever they believe to be true actually is. After interrogation, someone surreptitiously casts Remove Curse or Greater Restoration on you and your original memory returns, at which point you presumably mutter "keikaku1 doori".



                Given the restrictions of Modify Memory this works best for concealing knowledge of specific events; the longer ago the events are or the more material you have to cover, the technique swiftly becomes impractical.



                This doesn't strictly meet your constraints since it requires you to actually be affected by Zone of Truth and does not conceal that from the caster, but I am not sure there actually is a reliable way to render oneself immune to the spell without tipping off or having to compromise the caster. Either they know you're passing your saves, or by lack of information they know you're not even making saves and therefore aren't affected.



                1. keikaku means plan






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                Modify Memory



                Depending on the circumstances and the precise information you need to keep secret, you may able to effectively defeat a Zone of Truth by having your memory modified in advance by an ally using the Modify Memory spell. Affected creatures in a Zone of Truth cannot deliberately lie, but that doesn't mean that whatever they believe to be true actually is. After interrogation, someone surreptitiously casts Remove Curse or Greater Restoration on you and your original memory returns, at which point you presumably mutter "keikaku1 doori".



                Given the restrictions of Modify Memory this works best for concealing knowledge of specific events; the longer ago the events are or the more material you have to cover, the technique swiftly becomes impractical.



                This doesn't strictly meet your constraints since it requires you to actually be affected by Zone of Truth and does not conceal that from the caster, but I am not sure there actually is a reliable way to render oneself immune to the spell without tipping off or having to compromise the caster. Either they know you're passing your saves, or by lack of information they know you're not even making saves and therefore aren't affected.



                1. keikaku means plan







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Apr 27 at 15:19

























                answered Apr 27 at 14:29









                CarcerCarcer

                27.7k583146




                27.7k583146











                • $begingroup$
                  I agree that Modify Memory is a potential solution in general. However, in the specific context of a loyalty test, I think that Modify Memory is particularly unsuitable, since "A modified memory doesn't necessarily affect how a creature behaves, particularly if the memory contradicts the creature's natural inclinations, alignment, or beliefs. An illogical modified memory [...] is dismissed, perhaps as a bad dream." There's also the problem that if someone successfully uses Modify Memory to genuinely flip your loyalties, they will also need to restore your memory later.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Ryan Thompson
                  Apr 27 at 14:36






                • 2




                  $begingroup$
                  Now that I think about it, if there's only one interrogator, a better way to use Modify Memory might be to cast it on the interrogator during the interrogation (make sure they use their spell slot on ZoT first, though, or they might spot the inconsistency).
                  $endgroup$
                  – Ryan Thompson
                  Apr 27 at 16:23







                • 2




                  $begingroup$
                  @RyanThompson: Unless you're a sorcerer with Subtle Spell multiclassed into one of the spells that can cast modify memory, you casting the spell will probably be noticed pretty easily... Plus I imagine most interrogations aren't one-on-one anyway. (Nice Death Note reference, Carcer :P )
                  $endgroup$
                  – V2Blast
                  Apr 27 at 19:28







                • 1




                  $begingroup$
                  @V2Blast Yeah, that's why I said it would only work for a one-on-one interrogation. You can make the target forget you cast the spell, but others will notice it. This is arguably true even with Subtle Spell, since you have to speak to the target to tell them what to remember instead, and that's going to be a challenge to pull off without someone else catching on.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Ryan Thompson
                  Apr 27 at 20:55

















                • $begingroup$
                  I agree that Modify Memory is a potential solution in general. However, in the specific context of a loyalty test, I think that Modify Memory is particularly unsuitable, since "A modified memory doesn't necessarily affect how a creature behaves, particularly if the memory contradicts the creature's natural inclinations, alignment, or beliefs. An illogical modified memory [...] is dismissed, perhaps as a bad dream." There's also the problem that if someone successfully uses Modify Memory to genuinely flip your loyalties, they will also need to restore your memory later.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Ryan Thompson
                  Apr 27 at 14:36






                • 2




                  $begingroup$
                  Now that I think about it, if there's only one interrogator, a better way to use Modify Memory might be to cast it on the interrogator during the interrogation (make sure they use their spell slot on ZoT first, though, or they might spot the inconsistency).
                  $endgroup$
                  – Ryan Thompson
                  Apr 27 at 16:23







                • 2




                  $begingroup$
                  @RyanThompson: Unless you're a sorcerer with Subtle Spell multiclassed into one of the spells that can cast modify memory, you casting the spell will probably be noticed pretty easily... Plus I imagine most interrogations aren't one-on-one anyway. (Nice Death Note reference, Carcer :P )
                  $endgroup$
                  – V2Blast
                  Apr 27 at 19:28







                • 1




                  $begingroup$
                  @V2Blast Yeah, that's why I said it would only work for a one-on-one interrogation. You can make the target forget you cast the spell, but others will notice it. This is arguably true even with Subtle Spell, since you have to speak to the target to tell them what to remember instead, and that's going to be a challenge to pull off without someone else catching on.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Ryan Thompson
                  Apr 27 at 20:55
















                $begingroup$
                I agree that Modify Memory is a potential solution in general. However, in the specific context of a loyalty test, I think that Modify Memory is particularly unsuitable, since "A modified memory doesn't necessarily affect how a creature behaves, particularly if the memory contradicts the creature's natural inclinations, alignment, or beliefs. An illogical modified memory [...] is dismissed, perhaps as a bad dream." There's also the problem that if someone successfully uses Modify Memory to genuinely flip your loyalties, they will also need to restore your memory later.
                $endgroup$
                – Ryan Thompson
                Apr 27 at 14:36




                $begingroup$
                I agree that Modify Memory is a potential solution in general. However, in the specific context of a loyalty test, I think that Modify Memory is particularly unsuitable, since "A modified memory doesn't necessarily affect how a creature behaves, particularly if the memory contradicts the creature's natural inclinations, alignment, or beliefs. An illogical modified memory [...] is dismissed, perhaps as a bad dream." There's also the problem that if someone successfully uses Modify Memory to genuinely flip your loyalties, they will also need to restore your memory later.
                $endgroup$
                – Ryan Thompson
                Apr 27 at 14:36




                2




                2




                $begingroup$
                Now that I think about it, if there's only one interrogator, a better way to use Modify Memory might be to cast it on the interrogator during the interrogation (make sure they use their spell slot on ZoT first, though, or they might spot the inconsistency).
                $endgroup$
                – Ryan Thompson
                Apr 27 at 16:23





                $begingroup$
                Now that I think about it, if there's only one interrogator, a better way to use Modify Memory might be to cast it on the interrogator during the interrogation (make sure they use their spell slot on ZoT first, though, or they might spot the inconsistency).
                $endgroup$
                – Ryan Thompson
                Apr 27 at 16:23





                2




                2




                $begingroup$
                @RyanThompson: Unless you're a sorcerer with Subtle Spell multiclassed into one of the spells that can cast modify memory, you casting the spell will probably be noticed pretty easily... Plus I imagine most interrogations aren't one-on-one anyway. (Nice Death Note reference, Carcer :P )
                $endgroup$
                – V2Blast
                Apr 27 at 19:28





                $begingroup$
                @RyanThompson: Unless you're a sorcerer with Subtle Spell multiclassed into one of the spells that can cast modify memory, you casting the spell will probably be noticed pretty easily... Plus I imagine most interrogations aren't one-on-one anyway. (Nice Death Note reference, Carcer :P )
                $endgroup$
                – V2Blast
                Apr 27 at 19:28





                1




                1




                $begingroup$
                @V2Blast Yeah, that's why I said it would only work for a one-on-one interrogation. You can make the target forget you cast the spell, but others will notice it. This is arguably true even with Subtle Spell, since you have to speak to the target to tell them what to remember instead, and that's going to be a challenge to pull off without someone else catching on.
                $endgroup$
                – Ryan Thompson
                Apr 27 at 20:55





                $begingroup$
                @V2Blast Yeah, that's why I said it would only work for a one-on-one interrogation. You can make the target forget you cast the spell, but others will notice it. This is arguably true even with Subtle Spell, since you have to speak to the target to tell them what to remember instead, and that's going to be a challenge to pull off without someone else catching on.
                $endgroup$
                – Ryan Thompson
                Apr 27 at 20:55












                4












                $begingroup$

                Minor Illusion



                You say yes, they hear no. You told the truth, but defeated the Zone of Truth with a cantrip.



                If you need more certainty of success, just go with a higher level illusion spell.



                Of course, you will need a way to cast it without detection, but I'm sure you can come up with ways given enough prep time.






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$

















                  4












                  $begingroup$

                  Minor Illusion



                  You say yes, they hear no. You told the truth, but defeated the Zone of Truth with a cantrip.



                  If you need more certainty of success, just go with a higher level illusion spell.



                  Of course, you will need a way to cast it without detection, but I'm sure you can come up with ways given enough prep time.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$















                    4












                    4








                    4





                    $begingroup$

                    Minor Illusion



                    You say yes, they hear no. You told the truth, but defeated the Zone of Truth with a cantrip.



                    If you need more certainty of success, just go with a higher level illusion spell.



                    Of course, you will need a way to cast it without detection, but I'm sure you can come up with ways given enough prep time.






                    share|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    Minor Illusion



                    You say yes, they hear no. You told the truth, but defeated the Zone of Truth with a cantrip.



                    If you need more certainty of success, just go with a higher level illusion spell.



                    Of course, you will need a way to cast it without detection, but I'm sure you can come up with ways given enough prep time.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered Apr 28 at 7:04









                    TrevortniTrevortni

                    1675




                    1675





















                        3












                        $begingroup$

                        Get Dominated



                        So you cannot speak a deliberate lie?




                        deliberate, adj. done consciously and intentionally




                        If you are not in control of your own actions, you cannot lie deliberately. You are forced to say what you say. Get an ally (standing outside the spell radius if possible to make sure) to cast dominate person on you and




                        take total and precise control of the target. [..] the
                        creature takes only the actions you choose, and doesn't
                        do anything that you don't allow it to do. (PHB 235)




                        You will still roll the saves against the zone of truth and the results will be known by the caster. It is just that this makes no difference regarding what you actually say.






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$

















                          3












                          $begingroup$

                          Get Dominated



                          So you cannot speak a deliberate lie?




                          deliberate, adj. done consciously and intentionally




                          If you are not in control of your own actions, you cannot lie deliberately. You are forced to say what you say. Get an ally (standing outside the spell radius if possible to make sure) to cast dominate person on you and




                          take total and precise control of the target. [..] the
                          creature takes only the actions you choose, and doesn't
                          do anything that you don't allow it to do. (PHB 235)




                          You will still roll the saves against the zone of truth and the results will be known by the caster. It is just that this makes no difference regarding what you actually say.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$















                            3












                            3








                            3





                            $begingroup$

                            Get Dominated



                            So you cannot speak a deliberate lie?




                            deliberate, adj. done consciously and intentionally




                            If you are not in control of your own actions, you cannot lie deliberately. You are forced to say what you say. Get an ally (standing outside the spell radius if possible to make sure) to cast dominate person on you and




                            take total and precise control of the target. [..] the
                            creature takes only the actions you choose, and doesn't
                            do anything that you don't allow it to do. (PHB 235)




                            You will still roll the saves against the zone of truth and the results will be known by the caster. It is just that this makes no difference regarding what you actually say.






                            share|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            Get Dominated



                            So you cannot speak a deliberate lie?




                            deliberate, adj. done consciously and intentionally




                            If you are not in control of your own actions, you cannot lie deliberately. You are forced to say what you say. Get an ally (standing outside the spell radius if possible to make sure) to cast dominate person on you and




                            take total and precise control of the target. [..] the
                            creature takes only the actions you choose, and doesn't
                            do anything that you don't allow it to do. (PHB 235)




                            You will still roll the saves against the zone of truth and the results will be known by the caster. It is just that this makes no difference regarding what you actually say.







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered Apr 29 at 11:27









                            SzegaSzega

                            40.5k4165200




                            40.5k4165200



























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded
















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f147002%2fhow-can-the-zone-of-truth-spell-be-defeated-without-the-caster-knowing%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Wikipedia:Vital articles Мазмуну Biography - Өмүр баян Philosophy and psychology - Философия жана психология Religion - Дин Social sciences - Коомдук илимдер Language and literature - Тил жана адабият Science - Илим Technology - Технология Arts and recreation - Искусство жана эс алуу History and geography - Тарых жана география Навигация менюсу

                                Bruxelas-Capital Índice Historia | Composición | Situación lingüística | Clima | Cidades irmandadas | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióneO uso das linguas en Bruxelas e a situación do neerlandés"Rexión de Bruxelas Capital"o orixinalSitio da rexiónPáxina de Bruselas no sitio da Oficina de Promoción Turística de Valonia e BruxelasMapa Interactivo da Rexión de Bruxelas-CapitaleeWorldCat332144929079854441105155190212ID28008674080552-90000 0001 0666 3698n94104302ID540940339365017018237

                                What should I write in an apology letter, since I have decided not to join a company after accepting an offer letterShould I keep looking after accepting a job offer?What should I do when I've been verbally told I would get an offer letter, but still haven't gotten one after 4 weeks?Do I accept an offer from a company that I am not likely to join?New job hasn't confirmed starting date and I want to give current employer as much notice as possibleHow should I address my manager in my resignation letter?HR delayed background verification, now jobless as resignedNo email communication after accepting a formal written offer. How should I phrase the call?What should I do if after receiving a verbal offer letter I am informed that my written job offer is put on hold due to some internal issues?Should I inform the current employer that I am about to resign within 1-2 weeks since I have signed the offer letter and waiting for visa?What company will do, if I send their offer letter to another company