How can the Zone of Truth spell be defeated without the caster knowing?Which “anti-lie-detection” features actually affect Zone of Truth?Will zone of truth affect the dead?Does a spellcaster know when their spell has no effect due to a save or immunity?How does Mind Blank affect the Zone of Truth spell?Are targets that save against Zone of Truth aware of the spell?How many saves do you roll vs. Zone of Truth?Does the caster of an enchantment spell always know if the spell worked or failed?Is it OP to let Guardian of Faith attack every turn?Is this homebrew Bardic College balanced?Does the Fear spell work with an Oath of Conquest paladin's Aura of Conquest?How does the Antimagic Field spell affect the caster of a Zone of Truth's ability to know whether a target succeeded or failed the save?
How did the Apollo guidance computer handle parity bit errors?
Is throwing dice a stochastic or a deterministic process?
Efficient deletion of specific list entries
Huffman Code in C++
How do I, as a DM, handle a party that decides to set up an ambush in a dungeon?
What word describes the sound of an instrument based on the shape of the waveform of its sound?
In "Avengers: Endgame", what does this name refer to?
Installing Debian 10, upgrade to stable later?
Collision domain question
Was there a dinosaur-counter in the original Jurassic Park movie?
What is the meaning of 「隣のおじいさんは言いました」
How to use awk to extract data from a file based on the content of another file?
Can a player choose to add detail and flavor to their character's spells and abilities?
Transistor gain, what if there is not enough current?
Why are condenser mics so much more expensive than dynamics?
Picking a theme as a discovery writer
My large rocket is still flipping over
Why increasing of the temperature of the objects like wood, paper etc. doesn't fire them?
What does the coin flipping before dying mean?
Given a safe domain, are subdirectories safe as well?
Do quaternary sulfur dications exist?
How is Pauli's exclusion principle still valid in these cases?
How can I finally understand the confusing modal verb "мочь"?
How important are good looking people in a novel/story?
How can the Zone of Truth spell be defeated without the caster knowing?
Which “anti-lie-detection” features actually affect Zone of Truth?Will zone of truth affect the dead?Does a spellcaster know when their spell has no effect due to a save or immunity?How does Mind Blank affect the Zone of Truth spell?Are targets that save against Zone of Truth aware of the spell?How many saves do you roll vs. Zone of Truth?Does the caster of an enchantment spell always know if the spell worked or failed?Is it OP to let Guardian of Faith attack every turn?Is this homebrew Bardic College balanced?Does the Fear spell work with an Oath of Conquest paladin's Aura of Conquest?How does the Antimagic Field spell affect the caster of a Zone of Truth's ability to know whether a target succeeded or failed the save?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
The Zone of Truth spell contains the following clause:
You know whether each creature succeeds or fails on its saving throw.
In a scenario of checking someone's loyalty, any countermeasure that allows you to always succeed your save against this spell will alert the caster that you have succeeded the save. They will keep you in the area of the spell until you succeed, or until it's clear something is stopping you from failing - at which point the caster will tell you to remove whatever that effect is doing this, or have it assumed you are disloyal.
What are all the countermeasures to this spell which:
- don't allow the spell to affect you, and
- don't alert the caster you're unaffected?
Note that to fulfil (1), answers should avoid "you can lie by telling the truth in a ZoT". A competent interrogator will simply ask direct yes/no questions and assume disloyalty if they are not answered directly.
dnd-5e spells
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The Zone of Truth spell contains the following clause:
You know whether each creature succeeds or fails on its saving throw.
In a scenario of checking someone's loyalty, any countermeasure that allows you to always succeed your save against this spell will alert the caster that you have succeeded the save. They will keep you in the area of the spell until you succeed, or until it's clear something is stopping you from failing - at which point the caster will tell you to remove whatever that effect is doing this, or have it assumed you are disloyal.
What are all the countermeasures to this spell which:
- don't allow the spell to affect you, and
- don't alert the caster you're unaffected?
Note that to fulfil (1), answers should avoid "you can lie by telling the truth in a ZoT". A competent interrogator will simply ask direct yes/no questions and assume disloyalty if they are not answered directly.
dnd-5e spells
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Is help from allies allowed?
$endgroup$
– Szega
Apr 27 at 15:43
$begingroup$
@Szega sure, if that help fulfils the two conditions specified.
$endgroup$
– Vigil
Apr 29 at 10:30
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The Zone of Truth spell contains the following clause:
You know whether each creature succeeds or fails on its saving throw.
In a scenario of checking someone's loyalty, any countermeasure that allows you to always succeed your save against this spell will alert the caster that you have succeeded the save. They will keep you in the area of the spell until you succeed, or until it's clear something is stopping you from failing - at which point the caster will tell you to remove whatever that effect is doing this, or have it assumed you are disloyal.
What are all the countermeasures to this spell which:
- don't allow the spell to affect you, and
- don't alert the caster you're unaffected?
Note that to fulfil (1), answers should avoid "you can lie by telling the truth in a ZoT". A competent interrogator will simply ask direct yes/no questions and assume disloyalty if they are not answered directly.
dnd-5e spells
$endgroup$
The Zone of Truth spell contains the following clause:
You know whether each creature succeeds or fails on its saving throw.
In a scenario of checking someone's loyalty, any countermeasure that allows you to always succeed your save against this spell will alert the caster that you have succeeded the save. They will keep you in the area of the spell until you succeed, or until it's clear something is stopping you from failing - at which point the caster will tell you to remove whatever that effect is doing this, or have it assumed you are disloyal.
What are all the countermeasures to this spell which:
- don't allow the spell to affect you, and
- don't alert the caster you're unaffected?
Note that to fulfil (1), answers should avoid "you can lie by telling the truth in a ZoT". A competent interrogator will simply ask direct yes/no questions and assume disloyalty if they are not answered directly.
dnd-5e spells
dnd-5e spells
edited Apr 27 at 19:26
V2Blast
28.7k5103174
28.7k5103174
asked Apr 27 at 13:01
VigilVigil
7,2393289
7,2393289
2
$begingroup$
Is help from allies allowed?
$endgroup$
– Szega
Apr 27 at 15:43
$begingroup$
@Szega sure, if that help fulfils the two conditions specified.
$endgroup$
– Vigil
Apr 29 at 10:30
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
Is help from allies allowed?
$endgroup$
– Szega
Apr 27 at 15:43
$begingroup$
@Szega sure, if that help fulfils the two conditions specified.
$endgroup$
– Vigil
Apr 29 at 10:30
2
2
$begingroup$
Is help from allies allowed?
$endgroup$
– Szega
Apr 27 at 15:43
$begingroup$
Is help from allies allowed?
$endgroup$
– Szega
Apr 27 at 15:43
$begingroup$
@Szega sure, if that help fulfils the two conditions specified.
$endgroup$
– Vigil
Apr 29 at 10:30
$begingroup$
@Szega sure, if that help fulfils the two conditions specified.
$endgroup$
– Vigil
Apr 29 at 10:30
add a comment |
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Mechanically, Zone of Truth can be defeated only by high-level features
As you say, any attempt to resist or evade the effects of Zone of Truth alerts the caster. And in the context of a loyalty test, avoiding the effect is synonymous with admitting disloyalty. The only exceptions to this are a handful of high-level features: the Mastermind Rogue's Soul of Deceit feature (as mentioned in Louis Wasserman's answer) defeats truth-detection magic, and the 8th level spell Glibness provides a similar ability:
[...] no matter what you say, magic that would determine if you are telling the truth indicates that you are being truthful.
Note that while Glibness causes Zone of Truth to read whatever you say as truthful, it doesn't necessarily protect you from being forced to tell the truth. If you intend to use it, you should ask your DM ahead of time how it will work with Zone of Truth to avoid arguments when it actually happens. (In contrast, Soul of Deceit explicitly says you can't be forced to tell the truth by magic, so there is no ambiguity there.)
In any case, unless you have access to features or spells available around 15th-17th level, you'll have to make it through your loyalty test by telling what your character believes to be the truth.
Believe your lies
However, there is at least one small and difficult-to-exploit loophole that doesn't require any powerful abilities: Zone of Truth only prevents a creature from speaking a deliberate lie. If you can manage to believe your lies, you will be able to speak those lies while under the effect of Zone of Truth. For example, if the loyalty question is something like "Are you loyal to the Empire?", then you would be able to answer with a simple "yes" even if you were plotting to assassinate the emperor, as long as you truly and honestly believed that doing so would help the Empire. Obviously, this is a very situational workaround, but I want to emphasize that this is materially different from being evasive or "lying with the truth". This is a case where you give exactly the truthful answer that is expected of you, but for a completely different reason (while praying that you are never asked to elaborate on that reason).
In practice, when you as a player attempt to use this, you should probably expect some push-back from your DM, asking if your character really believes this. This "loophole" has a heavy character focus rather than a mechanical focus, so if you are planning to do this, be prepared with a solidly fleshed-out backstory to justify your honesty. And of course, be willing to accept that a slightly different question might reveal that your interpretation of loyalty differs from that of your interrogators. In the above example, you would not fare well if you were instead asked "Are you loyal to the emperor?"
Unfortunately, I don't have any experience to share of using this "loophole" in an actual game. I'm just pointing out that it's the only loophole I can think of.
$endgroup$
7
$begingroup$
I am loyal to the emperor. That's why he must die — he is hurting his own soul by corrupting the path of the gods. As a true patriot I will do whatever it takes to save him from that....
$endgroup$
– mattdm
Apr 27 at 14:48
4
$begingroup$
This is also why compartmentalizing information, and selective lies, to your subordinates can be quite effective: fool them well, and they may truly believe in being loyal to some ideals/persons/..., even as they work against them.
$endgroup$
– Matthieu M.
Apr 27 at 17:53
1
$begingroup$
@AllanMills If ZoT is active, being unable to lie is not suspicious, it's expected.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Apr 28 at 3:54
1
$begingroup$
@sevenbrokenbricks If the liar is using Glibness, then they must know that ZoT is in play, and they will avoid telling obvious lies even when ordered to, instead pretending that they are unable to lie because of ZoT. The interrogator could detect this ploy by only pretending to cast ZoT, but they would only do that if they already suspected an effect like Glibness was being used. You can keep on layering countermeasures upon countermeasures, but I think that's going quite far beyond the scope of the original question.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Apr 28 at 16:53
2
$begingroup$
"Your father was seduced by the dark side of the Force. He ceased to be Anakin Skywalker and became Darth Vader. When that happened, the good man who was your father was destroyed. So what I told you was true, from a certain point of view."
$endgroup$
– Dave Sherohman
Apr 29 at 7:50
|
show 8 more comments
$begingroup$
The Mastermind archetype for the Rogue class from Xanathar's Guide to Everything has a class feature, Soul of Deceit, which is explicitly about defeating truth magic: it says that you can't be compelled to tell the truth by magic and that magic that determines if you're telling the truth says you are.
This isn't succeeding on the save; it doesn't say anything about a saving throw. I would read the effects as that you make the saving throw as normal, but can ignore the results and lie as you like.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Modify Memory
Depending on the circumstances and the precise information you need to keep secret, you may able to effectively defeat a Zone of Truth by having your memory modified in advance by an ally using the Modify Memory spell. Affected creatures in a Zone of Truth cannot deliberately lie, but that doesn't mean that whatever they believe to be true actually is. After interrogation, someone surreptitiously casts Remove Curse or Greater Restoration on you and your original memory returns, at which point you presumably mutter "keikaku1 doori".
Given the restrictions of Modify Memory this works best for concealing knowledge of specific events; the longer ago the events are or the more material you have to cover, the technique swiftly becomes impractical.
This doesn't strictly meet your constraints since it requires you to actually be affected by Zone of Truth and does not conceal that from the caster, but I am not sure there actually is a reliable way to render oneself immune to the spell without tipping off or having to compromise the caster. Either they know you're passing your saves, or by lack of information they know you're not even making saves and therefore aren't affected.
1. keikaku means plan
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I agree that Modify Memory is a potential solution in general. However, in the specific context of a loyalty test, I think that Modify Memory is particularly unsuitable, since "A modified memory doesn't necessarily affect how a creature behaves, particularly if the memory contradicts the creature's natural inclinations, alignment, or beliefs. An illogical modified memory [...] is dismissed, perhaps as a bad dream." There's also the problem that if someone successfully uses Modify Memory to genuinely flip your loyalties, they will also need to restore your memory later.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Apr 27 at 14:36
2
$begingroup$
Now that I think about it, if there's only one interrogator, a better way to use Modify Memory might be to cast it on the interrogator during the interrogation (make sure they use their spell slot on ZoT first, though, or they might spot the inconsistency).
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Apr 27 at 16:23
2
$begingroup$
@RyanThompson: Unless you're a sorcerer with Subtle Spell multiclassed into one of the spells that can cast modify memory, you casting the spell will probably be noticed pretty easily... Plus I imagine most interrogations aren't one-on-one anyway. (Nice Death Note reference, Carcer :P )
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Apr 27 at 19:28
1
$begingroup$
@V2Blast Yeah, that's why I said it would only work for a one-on-one interrogation. You can make the target forget you cast the spell, but others will notice it. This is arguably true even with Subtle Spell, since you have to speak to the target to tell them what to remember instead, and that's going to be a challenge to pull off without someone else catching on.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Apr 27 at 20:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Minor Illusion
You say yes, they hear no. You told the truth, but defeated the Zone of Truth with a cantrip.
If you need more certainty of success, just go with a higher level illusion spell.
Of course, you will need a way to cast it without detection, but I'm sure you can come up with ways given enough prep time.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Get Dominated
So you cannot speak a deliberate lie?
deliberate, adj. done consciously and intentionally
If you are not in control of your own actions, you cannot lie deliberately. You are forced to say what you say. Get an ally (standing outside the spell radius if possible to make sure) to cast dominate person on you and
take total and precise control of the target. [..] the
creature takes only the actions you choose, and doesn't
do anything that you don't allow it to do. (PHB 235)
You will still roll the saves against the zone of truth and the results will be known by the caster. It is just that this makes no difference regarding what you actually say.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f147002%2fhow-can-the-zone-of-truth-spell-be-defeated-without-the-caster-knowing%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Mechanically, Zone of Truth can be defeated only by high-level features
As you say, any attempt to resist or evade the effects of Zone of Truth alerts the caster. And in the context of a loyalty test, avoiding the effect is synonymous with admitting disloyalty. The only exceptions to this are a handful of high-level features: the Mastermind Rogue's Soul of Deceit feature (as mentioned in Louis Wasserman's answer) defeats truth-detection magic, and the 8th level spell Glibness provides a similar ability:
[...] no matter what you say, magic that would determine if you are telling the truth indicates that you are being truthful.
Note that while Glibness causes Zone of Truth to read whatever you say as truthful, it doesn't necessarily protect you from being forced to tell the truth. If you intend to use it, you should ask your DM ahead of time how it will work with Zone of Truth to avoid arguments when it actually happens. (In contrast, Soul of Deceit explicitly says you can't be forced to tell the truth by magic, so there is no ambiguity there.)
In any case, unless you have access to features or spells available around 15th-17th level, you'll have to make it through your loyalty test by telling what your character believes to be the truth.
Believe your lies
However, there is at least one small and difficult-to-exploit loophole that doesn't require any powerful abilities: Zone of Truth only prevents a creature from speaking a deliberate lie. If you can manage to believe your lies, you will be able to speak those lies while under the effect of Zone of Truth. For example, if the loyalty question is something like "Are you loyal to the Empire?", then you would be able to answer with a simple "yes" even if you were plotting to assassinate the emperor, as long as you truly and honestly believed that doing so would help the Empire. Obviously, this is a very situational workaround, but I want to emphasize that this is materially different from being evasive or "lying with the truth". This is a case where you give exactly the truthful answer that is expected of you, but for a completely different reason (while praying that you are never asked to elaborate on that reason).
In practice, when you as a player attempt to use this, you should probably expect some push-back from your DM, asking if your character really believes this. This "loophole" has a heavy character focus rather than a mechanical focus, so if you are planning to do this, be prepared with a solidly fleshed-out backstory to justify your honesty. And of course, be willing to accept that a slightly different question might reveal that your interpretation of loyalty differs from that of your interrogators. In the above example, you would not fare well if you were instead asked "Are you loyal to the emperor?"
Unfortunately, I don't have any experience to share of using this "loophole" in an actual game. I'm just pointing out that it's the only loophole I can think of.
$endgroup$
7
$begingroup$
I am loyal to the emperor. That's why he must die — he is hurting his own soul by corrupting the path of the gods. As a true patriot I will do whatever it takes to save him from that....
$endgroup$
– mattdm
Apr 27 at 14:48
4
$begingroup$
This is also why compartmentalizing information, and selective lies, to your subordinates can be quite effective: fool them well, and they may truly believe in being loyal to some ideals/persons/..., even as they work against them.
$endgroup$
– Matthieu M.
Apr 27 at 17:53
1
$begingroup$
@AllanMills If ZoT is active, being unable to lie is not suspicious, it's expected.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Apr 28 at 3:54
1
$begingroup$
@sevenbrokenbricks If the liar is using Glibness, then they must know that ZoT is in play, and they will avoid telling obvious lies even when ordered to, instead pretending that they are unable to lie because of ZoT. The interrogator could detect this ploy by only pretending to cast ZoT, but they would only do that if they already suspected an effect like Glibness was being used. You can keep on layering countermeasures upon countermeasures, but I think that's going quite far beyond the scope of the original question.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Apr 28 at 16:53
2
$begingroup$
"Your father was seduced by the dark side of the Force. He ceased to be Anakin Skywalker and became Darth Vader. When that happened, the good man who was your father was destroyed. So what I told you was true, from a certain point of view."
$endgroup$
– Dave Sherohman
Apr 29 at 7:50
|
show 8 more comments
$begingroup$
Mechanically, Zone of Truth can be defeated only by high-level features
As you say, any attempt to resist or evade the effects of Zone of Truth alerts the caster. And in the context of a loyalty test, avoiding the effect is synonymous with admitting disloyalty. The only exceptions to this are a handful of high-level features: the Mastermind Rogue's Soul of Deceit feature (as mentioned in Louis Wasserman's answer) defeats truth-detection magic, and the 8th level spell Glibness provides a similar ability:
[...] no matter what you say, magic that would determine if you are telling the truth indicates that you are being truthful.
Note that while Glibness causes Zone of Truth to read whatever you say as truthful, it doesn't necessarily protect you from being forced to tell the truth. If you intend to use it, you should ask your DM ahead of time how it will work with Zone of Truth to avoid arguments when it actually happens. (In contrast, Soul of Deceit explicitly says you can't be forced to tell the truth by magic, so there is no ambiguity there.)
In any case, unless you have access to features or spells available around 15th-17th level, you'll have to make it through your loyalty test by telling what your character believes to be the truth.
Believe your lies
However, there is at least one small and difficult-to-exploit loophole that doesn't require any powerful abilities: Zone of Truth only prevents a creature from speaking a deliberate lie. If you can manage to believe your lies, you will be able to speak those lies while under the effect of Zone of Truth. For example, if the loyalty question is something like "Are you loyal to the Empire?", then you would be able to answer with a simple "yes" even if you were plotting to assassinate the emperor, as long as you truly and honestly believed that doing so would help the Empire. Obviously, this is a very situational workaround, but I want to emphasize that this is materially different from being evasive or "lying with the truth". This is a case where you give exactly the truthful answer that is expected of you, but for a completely different reason (while praying that you are never asked to elaborate on that reason).
In practice, when you as a player attempt to use this, you should probably expect some push-back from your DM, asking if your character really believes this. This "loophole" has a heavy character focus rather than a mechanical focus, so if you are planning to do this, be prepared with a solidly fleshed-out backstory to justify your honesty. And of course, be willing to accept that a slightly different question might reveal that your interpretation of loyalty differs from that of your interrogators. In the above example, you would not fare well if you were instead asked "Are you loyal to the emperor?"
Unfortunately, I don't have any experience to share of using this "loophole" in an actual game. I'm just pointing out that it's the only loophole I can think of.
$endgroup$
7
$begingroup$
I am loyal to the emperor. That's why he must die — he is hurting his own soul by corrupting the path of the gods. As a true patriot I will do whatever it takes to save him from that....
$endgroup$
– mattdm
Apr 27 at 14:48
4
$begingroup$
This is also why compartmentalizing information, and selective lies, to your subordinates can be quite effective: fool them well, and they may truly believe in being loyal to some ideals/persons/..., even as they work against them.
$endgroup$
– Matthieu M.
Apr 27 at 17:53
1
$begingroup$
@AllanMills If ZoT is active, being unable to lie is not suspicious, it's expected.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Apr 28 at 3:54
1
$begingroup$
@sevenbrokenbricks If the liar is using Glibness, then they must know that ZoT is in play, and they will avoid telling obvious lies even when ordered to, instead pretending that they are unable to lie because of ZoT. The interrogator could detect this ploy by only pretending to cast ZoT, but they would only do that if they already suspected an effect like Glibness was being used. You can keep on layering countermeasures upon countermeasures, but I think that's going quite far beyond the scope of the original question.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Apr 28 at 16:53
2
$begingroup$
"Your father was seduced by the dark side of the Force. He ceased to be Anakin Skywalker and became Darth Vader. When that happened, the good man who was your father was destroyed. So what I told you was true, from a certain point of view."
$endgroup$
– Dave Sherohman
Apr 29 at 7:50
|
show 8 more comments
$begingroup$
Mechanically, Zone of Truth can be defeated only by high-level features
As you say, any attempt to resist or evade the effects of Zone of Truth alerts the caster. And in the context of a loyalty test, avoiding the effect is synonymous with admitting disloyalty. The only exceptions to this are a handful of high-level features: the Mastermind Rogue's Soul of Deceit feature (as mentioned in Louis Wasserman's answer) defeats truth-detection magic, and the 8th level spell Glibness provides a similar ability:
[...] no matter what you say, magic that would determine if you are telling the truth indicates that you are being truthful.
Note that while Glibness causes Zone of Truth to read whatever you say as truthful, it doesn't necessarily protect you from being forced to tell the truth. If you intend to use it, you should ask your DM ahead of time how it will work with Zone of Truth to avoid arguments when it actually happens. (In contrast, Soul of Deceit explicitly says you can't be forced to tell the truth by magic, so there is no ambiguity there.)
In any case, unless you have access to features or spells available around 15th-17th level, you'll have to make it through your loyalty test by telling what your character believes to be the truth.
Believe your lies
However, there is at least one small and difficult-to-exploit loophole that doesn't require any powerful abilities: Zone of Truth only prevents a creature from speaking a deliberate lie. If you can manage to believe your lies, you will be able to speak those lies while under the effect of Zone of Truth. For example, if the loyalty question is something like "Are you loyal to the Empire?", then you would be able to answer with a simple "yes" even if you were plotting to assassinate the emperor, as long as you truly and honestly believed that doing so would help the Empire. Obviously, this is a very situational workaround, but I want to emphasize that this is materially different from being evasive or "lying with the truth". This is a case where you give exactly the truthful answer that is expected of you, but for a completely different reason (while praying that you are never asked to elaborate on that reason).
In practice, when you as a player attempt to use this, you should probably expect some push-back from your DM, asking if your character really believes this. This "loophole" has a heavy character focus rather than a mechanical focus, so if you are planning to do this, be prepared with a solidly fleshed-out backstory to justify your honesty. And of course, be willing to accept that a slightly different question might reveal that your interpretation of loyalty differs from that of your interrogators. In the above example, you would not fare well if you were instead asked "Are you loyal to the emperor?"
Unfortunately, I don't have any experience to share of using this "loophole" in an actual game. I'm just pointing out that it's the only loophole I can think of.
$endgroup$
Mechanically, Zone of Truth can be defeated only by high-level features
As you say, any attempt to resist or evade the effects of Zone of Truth alerts the caster. And in the context of a loyalty test, avoiding the effect is synonymous with admitting disloyalty. The only exceptions to this are a handful of high-level features: the Mastermind Rogue's Soul of Deceit feature (as mentioned in Louis Wasserman's answer) defeats truth-detection magic, and the 8th level spell Glibness provides a similar ability:
[...] no matter what you say, magic that would determine if you are telling the truth indicates that you are being truthful.
Note that while Glibness causes Zone of Truth to read whatever you say as truthful, it doesn't necessarily protect you from being forced to tell the truth. If you intend to use it, you should ask your DM ahead of time how it will work with Zone of Truth to avoid arguments when it actually happens. (In contrast, Soul of Deceit explicitly says you can't be forced to tell the truth by magic, so there is no ambiguity there.)
In any case, unless you have access to features or spells available around 15th-17th level, you'll have to make it through your loyalty test by telling what your character believes to be the truth.
Believe your lies
However, there is at least one small and difficult-to-exploit loophole that doesn't require any powerful abilities: Zone of Truth only prevents a creature from speaking a deliberate lie. If you can manage to believe your lies, you will be able to speak those lies while under the effect of Zone of Truth. For example, if the loyalty question is something like "Are you loyal to the Empire?", then you would be able to answer with a simple "yes" even if you were plotting to assassinate the emperor, as long as you truly and honestly believed that doing so would help the Empire. Obviously, this is a very situational workaround, but I want to emphasize that this is materially different from being evasive or "lying with the truth". This is a case where you give exactly the truthful answer that is expected of you, but for a completely different reason (while praying that you are never asked to elaborate on that reason).
In practice, when you as a player attempt to use this, you should probably expect some push-back from your DM, asking if your character really believes this. This "loophole" has a heavy character focus rather than a mechanical focus, so if you are planning to do this, be prepared with a solidly fleshed-out backstory to justify your honesty. And of course, be willing to accept that a slightly different question might reveal that your interpretation of loyalty differs from that of your interrogators. In the above example, you would not fare well if you were instead asked "Are you loyal to the emperor?"
Unfortunately, I don't have any experience to share of using this "loophole" in an actual game. I'm just pointing out that it's the only loophole I can think of.
edited Apr 27 at 18:29
answered Apr 27 at 14:18
Ryan ThompsonRyan Thompson
13.5k246103
13.5k246103
7
$begingroup$
I am loyal to the emperor. That's why he must die — he is hurting his own soul by corrupting the path of the gods. As a true patriot I will do whatever it takes to save him from that....
$endgroup$
– mattdm
Apr 27 at 14:48
4
$begingroup$
This is also why compartmentalizing information, and selective lies, to your subordinates can be quite effective: fool them well, and they may truly believe in being loyal to some ideals/persons/..., even as they work against them.
$endgroup$
– Matthieu M.
Apr 27 at 17:53
1
$begingroup$
@AllanMills If ZoT is active, being unable to lie is not suspicious, it's expected.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Apr 28 at 3:54
1
$begingroup$
@sevenbrokenbricks If the liar is using Glibness, then they must know that ZoT is in play, and they will avoid telling obvious lies even when ordered to, instead pretending that they are unable to lie because of ZoT. The interrogator could detect this ploy by only pretending to cast ZoT, but they would only do that if they already suspected an effect like Glibness was being used. You can keep on layering countermeasures upon countermeasures, but I think that's going quite far beyond the scope of the original question.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Apr 28 at 16:53
2
$begingroup$
"Your father was seduced by the dark side of the Force. He ceased to be Anakin Skywalker and became Darth Vader. When that happened, the good man who was your father was destroyed. So what I told you was true, from a certain point of view."
$endgroup$
– Dave Sherohman
Apr 29 at 7:50
|
show 8 more comments
7
$begingroup$
I am loyal to the emperor. That's why he must die — he is hurting his own soul by corrupting the path of the gods. As a true patriot I will do whatever it takes to save him from that....
$endgroup$
– mattdm
Apr 27 at 14:48
4
$begingroup$
This is also why compartmentalizing information, and selective lies, to your subordinates can be quite effective: fool them well, and they may truly believe in being loyal to some ideals/persons/..., even as they work against them.
$endgroup$
– Matthieu M.
Apr 27 at 17:53
1
$begingroup$
@AllanMills If ZoT is active, being unable to lie is not suspicious, it's expected.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Apr 28 at 3:54
1
$begingroup$
@sevenbrokenbricks If the liar is using Glibness, then they must know that ZoT is in play, and they will avoid telling obvious lies even when ordered to, instead pretending that they are unable to lie because of ZoT. The interrogator could detect this ploy by only pretending to cast ZoT, but they would only do that if they already suspected an effect like Glibness was being used. You can keep on layering countermeasures upon countermeasures, but I think that's going quite far beyond the scope of the original question.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Apr 28 at 16:53
2
$begingroup$
"Your father was seduced by the dark side of the Force. He ceased to be Anakin Skywalker and became Darth Vader. When that happened, the good man who was your father was destroyed. So what I told you was true, from a certain point of view."
$endgroup$
– Dave Sherohman
Apr 29 at 7:50
7
7
$begingroup$
I am loyal to the emperor. That's why he must die — he is hurting his own soul by corrupting the path of the gods. As a true patriot I will do whatever it takes to save him from that....
$endgroup$
– mattdm
Apr 27 at 14:48
$begingroup$
I am loyal to the emperor. That's why he must die — he is hurting his own soul by corrupting the path of the gods. As a true patriot I will do whatever it takes to save him from that....
$endgroup$
– mattdm
Apr 27 at 14:48
4
4
$begingroup$
This is also why compartmentalizing information, and selective lies, to your subordinates can be quite effective: fool them well, and they may truly believe in being loyal to some ideals/persons/..., even as they work against them.
$endgroup$
– Matthieu M.
Apr 27 at 17:53
$begingroup$
This is also why compartmentalizing information, and selective lies, to your subordinates can be quite effective: fool them well, and they may truly believe in being loyal to some ideals/persons/..., even as they work against them.
$endgroup$
– Matthieu M.
Apr 27 at 17:53
1
1
$begingroup$
@AllanMills If ZoT is active, being unable to lie is not suspicious, it's expected.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Apr 28 at 3:54
$begingroup$
@AllanMills If ZoT is active, being unable to lie is not suspicious, it's expected.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Apr 28 at 3:54
1
1
$begingroup$
@sevenbrokenbricks If the liar is using Glibness, then they must know that ZoT is in play, and they will avoid telling obvious lies even when ordered to, instead pretending that they are unable to lie because of ZoT. The interrogator could detect this ploy by only pretending to cast ZoT, but they would only do that if they already suspected an effect like Glibness was being used. You can keep on layering countermeasures upon countermeasures, but I think that's going quite far beyond the scope of the original question.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Apr 28 at 16:53
$begingroup$
@sevenbrokenbricks If the liar is using Glibness, then they must know that ZoT is in play, and they will avoid telling obvious lies even when ordered to, instead pretending that they are unable to lie because of ZoT. The interrogator could detect this ploy by only pretending to cast ZoT, but they would only do that if they already suspected an effect like Glibness was being used. You can keep on layering countermeasures upon countermeasures, but I think that's going quite far beyond the scope of the original question.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Apr 28 at 16:53
2
2
$begingroup$
"Your father was seduced by the dark side of the Force. He ceased to be Anakin Skywalker and became Darth Vader. When that happened, the good man who was your father was destroyed. So what I told you was true, from a certain point of view."
$endgroup$
– Dave Sherohman
Apr 29 at 7:50
$begingroup$
"Your father was seduced by the dark side of the Force. He ceased to be Anakin Skywalker and became Darth Vader. When that happened, the good man who was your father was destroyed. So what I told you was true, from a certain point of view."
$endgroup$
– Dave Sherohman
Apr 29 at 7:50
|
show 8 more comments
$begingroup$
The Mastermind archetype for the Rogue class from Xanathar's Guide to Everything has a class feature, Soul of Deceit, which is explicitly about defeating truth magic: it says that you can't be compelled to tell the truth by magic and that magic that determines if you're telling the truth says you are.
This isn't succeeding on the save; it doesn't say anything about a saving throw. I would read the effects as that you make the saving throw as normal, but can ignore the results and lie as you like.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The Mastermind archetype for the Rogue class from Xanathar's Guide to Everything has a class feature, Soul of Deceit, which is explicitly about defeating truth magic: it says that you can't be compelled to tell the truth by magic and that magic that determines if you're telling the truth says you are.
This isn't succeeding on the save; it doesn't say anything about a saving throw. I would read the effects as that you make the saving throw as normal, but can ignore the results and lie as you like.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The Mastermind archetype for the Rogue class from Xanathar's Guide to Everything has a class feature, Soul of Deceit, which is explicitly about defeating truth magic: it says that you can't be compelled to tell the truth by magic and that magic that determines if you're telling the truth says you are.
This isn't succeeding on the save; it doesn't say anything about a saving throw. I would read the effects as that you make the saving throw as normal, but can ignore the results and lie as you like.
$endgroup$
The Mastermind archetype for the Rogue class from Xanathar's Guide to Everything has a class feature, Soul of Deceit, which is explicitly about defeating truth magic: it says that you can't be compelled to tell the truth by magic and that magic that determines if you're telling the truth says you are.
This isn't succeeding on the save; it doesn't say anything about a saving throw. I would read the effects as that you make the saving throw as normal, but can ignore the results and lie as you like.
edited Apr 27 at 17:03
answered Apr 27 at 16:51
Louis WassermanLouis Wasserman
1,062115
1,062115
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Modify Memory
Depending on the circumstances and the precise information you need to keep secret, you may able to effectively defeat a Zone of Truth by having your memory modified in advance by an ally using the Modify Memory spell. Affected creatures in a Zone of Truth cannot deliberately lie, but that doesn't mean that whatever they believe to be true actually is. After interrogation, someone surreptitiously casts Remove Curse or Greater Restoration on you and your original memory returns, at which point you presumably mutter "keikaku1 doori".
Given the restrictions of Modify Memory this works best for concealing knowledge of specific events; the longer ago the events are or the more material you have to cover, the technique swiftly becomes impractical.
This doesn't strictly meet your constraints since it requires you to actually be affected by Zone of Truth and does not conceal that from the caster, but I am not sure there actually is a reliable way to render oneself immune to the spell without tipping off or having to compromise the caster. Either they know you're passing your saves, or by lack of information they know you're not even making saves and therefore aren't affected.
1. keikaku means plan
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I agree that Modify Memory is a potential solution in general. However, in the specific context of a loyalty test, I think that Modify Memory is particularly unsuitable, since "A modified memory doesn't necessarily affect how a creature behaves, particularly if the memory contradicts the creature's natural inclinations, alignment, or beliefs. An illogical modified memory [...] is dismissed, perhaps as a bad dream." There's also the problem that if someone successfully uses Modify Memory to genuinely flip your loyalties, they will also need to restore your memory later.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Apr 27 at 14:36
2
$begingroup$
Now that I think about it, if there's only one interrogator, a better way to use Modify Memory might be to cast it on the interrogator during the interrogation (make sure they use their spell slot on ZoT first, though, or they might spot the inconsistency).
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Apr 27 at 16:23
2
$begingroup$
@RyanThompson: Unless you're a sorcerer with Subtle Spell multiclassed into one of the spells that can cast modify memory, you casting the spell will probably be noticed pretty easily... Plus I imagine most interrogations aren't one-on-one anyway. (Nice Death Note reference, Carcer :P )
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Apr 27 at 19:28
1
$begingroup$
@V2Blast Yeah, that's why I said it would only work for a one-on-one interrogation. You can make the target forget you cast the spell, but others will notice it. This is arguably true even with Subtle Spell, since you have to speak to the target to tell them what to remember instead, and that's going to be a challenge to pull off without someone else catching on.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Apr 27 at 20:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Modify Memory
Depending on the circumstances and the precise information you need to keep secret, you may able to effectively defeat a Zone of Truth by having your memory modified in advance by an ally using the Modify Memory spell. Affected creatures in a Zone of Truth cannot deliberately lie, but that doesn't mean that whatever they believe to be true actually is. After interrogation, someone surreptitiously casts Remove Curse or Greater Restoration on you and your original memory returns, at which point you presumably mutter "keikaku1 doori".
Given the restrictions of Modify Memory this works best for concealing knowledge of specific events; the longer ago the events are or the more material you have to cover, the technique swiftly becomes impractical.
This doesn't strictly meet your constraints since it requires you to actually be affected by Zone of Truth and does not conceal that from the caster, but I am not sure there actually is a reliable way to render oneself immune to the spell without tipping off or having to compromise the caster. Either they know you're passing your saves, or by lack of information they know you're not even making saves and therefore aren't affected.
1. keikaku means plan
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I agree that Modify Memory is a potential solution in general. However, in the specific context of a loyalty test, I think that Modify Memory is particularly unsuitable, since "A modified memory doesn't necessarily affect how a creature behaves, particularly if the memory contradicts the creature's natural inclinations, alignment, or beliefs. An illogical modified memory [...] is dismissed, perhaps as a bad dream." There's also the problem that if someone successfully uses Modify Memory to genuinely flip your loyalties, they will also need to restore your memory later.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Apr 27 at 14:36
2
$begingroup$
Now that I think about it, if there's only one interrogator, a better way to use Modify Memory might be to cast it on the interrogator during the interrogation (make sure they use their spell slot on ZoT first, though, or they might spot the inconsistency).
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Apr 27 at 16:23
2
$begingroup$
@RyanThompson: Unless you're a sorcerer with Subtle Spell multiclassed into one of the spells that can cast modify memory, you casting the spell will probably be noticed pretty easily... Plus I imagine most interrogations aren't one-on-one anyway. (Nice Death Note reference, Carcer :P )
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Apr 27 at 19:28
1
$begingroup$
@V2Blast Yeah, that's why I said it would only work for a one-on-one interrogation. You can make the target forget you cast the spell, but others will notice it. This is arguably true even with Subtle Spell, since you have to speak to the target to tell them what to remember instead, and that's going to be a challenge to pull off without someone else catching on.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Apr 27 at 20:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Modify Memory
Depending on the circumstances and the precise information you need to keep secret, you may able to effectively defeat a Zone of Truth by having your memory modified in advance by an ally using the Modify Memory spell. Affected creatures in a Zone of Truth cannot deliberately lie, but that doesn't mean that whatever they believe to be true actually is. After interrogation, someone surreptitiously casts Remove Curse or Greater Restoration on you and your original memory returns, at which point you presumably mutter "keikaku1 doori".
Given the restrictions of Modify Memory this works best for concealing knowledge of specific events; the longer ago the events are or the more material you have to cover, the technique swiftly becomes impractical.
This doesn't strictly meet your constraints since it requires you to actually be affected by Zone of Truth and does not conceal that from the caster, but I am not sure there actually is a reliable way to render oneself immune to the spell without tipping off or having to compromise the caster. Either they know you're passing your saves, or by lack of information they know you're not even making saves and therefore aren't affected.
1. keikaku means plan
$endgroup$
Modify Memory
Depending on the circumstances and the precise information you need to keep secret, you may able to effectively defeat a Zone of Truth by having your memory modified in advance by an ally using the Modify Memory spell. Affected creatures in a Zone of Truth cannot deliberately lie, but that doesn't mean that whatever they believe to be true actually is. After interrogation, someone surreptitiously casts Remove Curse or Greater Restoration on you and your original memory returns, at which point you presumably mutter "keikaku1 doori".
Given the restrictions of Modify Memory this works best for concealing knowledge of specific events; the longer ago the events are or the more material you have to cover, the technique swiftly becomes impractical.
This doesn't strictly meet your constraints since it requires you to actually be affected by Zone of Truth and does not conceal that from the caster, but I am not sure there actually is a reliable way to render oneself immune to the spell without tipping off or having to compromise the caster. Either they know you're passing your saves, or by lack of information they know you're not even making saves and therefore aren't affected.
1. keikaku means plan
edited Apr 27 at 15:19
answered Apr 27 at 14:29
CarcerCarcer
27.7k583146
27.7k583146
$begingroup$
I agree that Modify Memory is a potential solution in general. However, in the specific context of a loyalty test, I think that Modify Memory is particularly unsuitable, since "A modified memory doesn't necessarily affect how a creature behaves, particularly if the memory contradicts the creature's natural inclinations, alignment, or beliefs. An illogical modified memory [...] is dismissed, perhaps as a bad dream." There's also the problem that if someone successfully uses Modify Memory to genuinely flip your loyalties, they will also need to restore your memory later.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Apr 27 at 14:36
2
$begingroup$
Now that I think about it, if there's only one interrogator, a better way to use Modify Memory might be to cast it on the interrogator during the interrogation (make sure they use their spell slot on ZoT first, though, or they might spot the inconsistency).
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Apr 27 at 16:23
2
$begingroup$
@RyanThompson: Unless you're a sorcerer with Subtle Spell multiclassed into one of the spells that can cast modify memory, you casting the spell will probably be noticed pretty easily... Plus I imagine most interrogations aren't one-on-one anyway. (Nice Death Note reference, Carcer :P )
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Apr 27 at 19:28
1
$begingroup$
@V2Blast Yeah, that's why I said it would only work for a one-on-one interrogation. You can make the target forget you cast the spell, but others will notice it. This is arguably true even with Subtle Spell, since you have to speak to the target to tell them what to remember instead, and that's going to be a challenge to pull off without someone else catching on.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Apr 27 at 20:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I agree that Modify Memory is a potential solution in general. However, in the specific context of a loyalty test, I think that Modify Memory is particularly unsuitable, since "A modified memory doesn't necessarily affect how a creature behaves, particularly if the memory contradicts the creature's natural inclinations, alignment, or beliefs. An illogical modified memory [...] is dismissed, perhaps as a bad dream." There's also the problem that if someone successfully uses Modify Memory to genuinely flip your loyalties, they will also need to restore your memory later.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Apr 27 at 14:36
2
$begingroup$
Now that I think about it, if there's only one interrogator, a better way to use Modify Memory might be to cast it on the interrogator during the interrogation (make sure they use their spell slot on ZoT first, though, or they might spot the inconsistency).
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Apr 27 at 16:23
2
$begingroup$
@RyanThompson: Unless you're a sorcerer with Subtle Spell multiclassed into one of the spells that can cast modify memory, you casting the spell will probably be noticed pretty easily... Plus I imagine most interrogations aren't one-on-one anyway. (Nice Death Note reference, Carcer :P )
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Apr 27 at 19:28
1
$begingroup$
@V2Blast Yeah, that's why I said it would only work for a one-on-one interrogation. You can make the target forget you cast the spell, but others will notice it. This is arguably true even with Subtle Spell, since you have to speak to the target to tell them what to remember instead, and that's going to be a challenge to pull off without someone else catching on.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Apr 27 at 20:55
$begingroup$
I agree that Modify Memory is a potential solution in general. However, in the specific context of a loyalty test, I think that Modify Memory is particularly unsuitable, since "A modified memory doesn't necessarily affect how a creature behaves, particularly if the memory contradicts the creature's natural inclinations, alignment, or beliefs. An illogical modified memory [...] is dismissed, perhaps as a bad dream." There's also the problem that if someone successfully uses Modify Memory to genuinely flip your loyalties, they will also need to restore your memory later.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Apr 27 at 14:36
$begingroup$
I agree that Modify Memory is a potential solution in general. However, in the specific context of a loyalty test, I think that Modify Memory is particularly unsuitable, since "A modified memory doesn't necessarily affect how a creature behaves, particularly if the memory contradicts the creature's natural inclinations, alignment, or beliefs. An illogical modified memory [...] is dismissed, perhaps as a bad dream." There's also the problem that if someone successfully uses Modify Memory to genuinely flip your loyalties, they will also need to restore your memory later.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Apr 27 at 14:36
2
2
$begingroup$
Now that I think about it, if there's only one interrogator, a better way to use Modify Memory might be to cast it on the interrogator during the interrogation (make sure they use their spell slot on ZoT first, though, or they might spot the inconsistency).
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Apr 27 at 16:23
$begingroup$
Now that I think about it, if there's only one interrogator, a better way to use Modify Memory might be to cast it on the interrogator during the interrogation (make sure they use their spell slot on ZoT first, though, or they might spot the inconsistency).
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Apr 27 at 16:23
2
2
$begingroup$
@RyanThompson: Unless you're a sorcerer with Subtle Spell multiclassed into one of the spells that can cast modify memory, you casting the spell will probably be noticed pretty easily... Plus I imagine most interrogations aren't one-on-one anyway. (Nice Death Note reference, Carcer :P )
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Apr 27 at 19:28
$begingroup$
@RyanThompson: Unless you're a sorcerer with Subtle Spell multiclassed into one of the spells that can cast modify memory, you casting the spell will probably be noticed pretty easily... Plus I imagine most interrogations aren't one-on-one anyway. (Nice Death Note reference, Carcer :P )
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
Apr 27 at 19:28
1
1
$begingroup$
@V2Blast Yeah, that's why I said it would only work for a one-on-one interrogation. You can make the target forget you cast the spell, but others will notice it. This is arguably true even with Subtle Spell, since you have to speak to the target to tell them what to remember instead, and that's going to be a challenge to pull off without someone else catching on.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Apr 27 at 20:55
$begingroup$
@V2Blast Yeah, that's why I said it would only work for a one-on-one interrogation. You can make the target forget you cast the spell, but others will notice it. This is arguably true even with Subtle Spell, since you have to speak to the target to tell them what to remember instead, and that's going to be a challenge to pull off without someone else catching on.
$endgroup$
– Ryan Thompson
Apr 27 at 20:55
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Minor Illusion
You say yes, they hear no. You told the truth, but defeated the Zone of Truth with a cantrip.
If you need more certainty of success, just go with a higher level illusion spell.
Of course, you will need a way to cast it without detection, but I'm sure you can come up with ways given enough prep time.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Minor Illusion
You say yes, they hear no. You told the truth, but defeated the Zone of Truth with a cantrip.
If you need more certainty of success, just go with a higher level illusion spell.
Of course, you will need a way to cast it without detection, but I'm sure you can come up with ways given enough prep time.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Minor Illusion
You say yes, they hear no. You told the truth, but defeated the Zone of Truth with a cantrip.
If you need more certainty of success, just go with a higher level illusion spell.
Of course, you will need a way to cast it without detection, but I'm sure you can come up with ways given enough prep time.
$endgroup$
Minor Illusion
You say yes, they hear no. You told the truth, but defeated the Zone of Truth with a cantrip.
If you need more certainty of success, just go with a higher level illusion spell.
Of course, you will need a way to cast it without detection, but I'm sure you can come up with ways given enough prep time.
answered Apr 28 at 7:04
TrevortniTrevortni
1675
1675
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Get Dominated
So you cannot speak a deliberate lie?
deliberate, adj. done consciously and intentionally
If you are not in control of your own actions, you cannot lie deliberately. You are forced to say what you say. Get an ally (standing outside the spell radius if possible to make sure) to cast dominate person on you and
take total and precise control of the target. [..] the
creature takes only the actions you choose, and doesn't
do anything that you don't allow it to do. (PHB 235)
You will still roll the saves against the zone of truth and the results will be known by the caster. It is just that this makes no difference regarding what you actually say.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Get Dominated
So you cannot speak a deliberate lie?
deliberate, adj. done consciously and intentionally
If you are not in control of your own actions, you cannot lie deliberately. You are forced to say what you say. Get an ally (standing outside the spell radius if possible to make sure) to cast dominate person on you and
take total and precise control of the target. [..] the
creature takes only the actions you choose, and doesn't
do anything that you don't allow it to do. (PHB 235)
You will still roll the saves against the zone of truth and the results will be known by the caster. It is just that this makes no difference regarding what you actually say.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Get Dominated
So you cannot speak a deliberate lie?
deliberate, adj. done consciously and intentionally
If you are not in control of your own actions, you cannot lie deliberately. You are forced to say what you say. Get an ally (standing outside the spell radius if possible to make sure) to cast dominate person on you and
take total and precise control of the target. [..] the
creature takes only the actions you choose, and doesn't
do anything that you don't allow it to do. (PHB 235)
You will still roll the saves against the zone of truth and the results will be known by the caster. It is just that this makes no difference regarding what you actually say.
$endgroup$
Get Dominated
So you cannot speak a deliberate lie?
deliberate, adj. done consciously and intentionally
If you are not in control of your own actions, you cannot lie deliberately. You are forced to say what you say. Get an ally (standing outside the spell radius if possible to make sure) to cast dominate person on you and
take total and precise control of the target. [..] the
creature takes only the actions you choose, and doesn't
do anything that you don't allow it to do. (PHB 235)
You will still roll the saves against the zone of truth and the results will be known by the caster. It is just that this makes no difference regarding what you actually say.
answered Apr 29 at 11:27
SzegaSzega
40.5k4165200
40.5k4165200
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f147002%2fhow-can-the-zone-of-truth-spell-be-defeated-without-the-caster-knowing%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
Is help from allies allowed?
$endgroup$
– Szega
Apr 27 at 15:43
$begingroup$
@Szega sure, if that help fulfils the two conditions specified.
$endgroup$
– Vigil
Apr 29 at 10:30