Noun clause (singular all the time?)Should there be a comma after 'and'?Plural of noun and concept takes singular verb?Difference between an adverb modifying an NP consisting a single noun, and an adverb modifying a nounClause QuestionWhy plural noun and verb in singular form, present tense takes 's'?whatever - Are these all noun clauses?How to determine the number of the noun phrase 'a world of + plural noun'?embedded interrogative Clause when quoting“the only one of + plural noun” = singular or plural verb? (focus on the only)superlative + relative clause

Multi tool use
Multi tool use

Can I combine SELECT TOP() with the IN operator?

How can I finally understand the confusing modal verb "мочь"?

What is the thing used to help pouring liquids called?

Lines too long in piece with two sections for different instruments

Why doesn't a particle exert force on itself?

Dual frame in Riemannian metrics.

What detail can Hubble see on Mars?

What does the coin flipping before dying mean?

How to deal with employer who keeps me at work after working hours

As a GM, is it bad form to ask for a moment to think when improvising?

Reverse ColorFunction or ColorData

How is Pauli's exclusion principle still valid in these cases?

Was there a dinosaur-counter in the original Jurassic Park movie?

Which "exotic salt" can lower water's freezing point by –70 °C?

What is more safe for browsing the web: PC or smartphone?

How is trade in services conducted under the WTO in the absence of the Doha conclusion?

Endgame puzzle: How to avoid stalemate and win?

How did the Force make Luke hard to hit in the Battle of Yavin?

Transistor gain, what if there is not enough current?

Given four points how can I find an equation for any pattern?

Playing Doublets with the Primes

How long did it take Captain Marvel to travel to Earth?

Is there a reason why Turkey took the Balkan territories of the Ottoman Empire, instead of Greece or another of the Balkan states?

GitLab account hacked and repo wiped



Noun clause (singular all the time?)


Should there be a comma after 'and'?Plural of noun and concept takes singular verb?Difference between an adverb modifying an NP consisting a single noun, and an adverb modifying a nounClause QuestionWhy plural noun and verb in singular form, present tense takes 's'?whatever - Are these all noun clauses?How to determine the number of the noun phrase 'a world of + plural noun'?embedded interrogative Clause when quoting“the only one of + plural noun” = singular or plural verb? (focus on the only)superlative + relative clause






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3















I have asked one grammarian about this and she ended up being unsure of her answer.
Question: is there a possibility that a noun clause is used in a plural manner? For instance:
- Her eyes and nose are WHAT SCARE ME.
- WHAT SCARE ME are her eyes and nose.



Should the word "scare" be "scares" in the examples?
Should "are" be "is" then?










share|improve this question






















  • For plural I would prefer Those which scare me are .... Because "what" is inherently singular.

    – aparente001
    Apr 28 at 5:57

















3















I have asked one grammarian about this and she ended up being unsure of her answer.
Question: is there a possibility that a noun clause is used in a plural manner? For instance:
- Her eyes and nose are WHAT SCARE ME.
- WHAT SCARE ME are her eyes and nose.



Should the word "scare" be "scares" in the examples?
Should "are" be "is" then?










share|improve this question






















  • For plural I would prefer Those which scare me are .... Because "what" is inherently singular.

    – aparente001
    Apr 28 at 5:57













3












3








3


1






I have asked one grammarian about this and she ended up being unsure of her answer.
Question: is there a possibility that a noun clause is used in a plural manner? For instance:
- Her eyes and nose are WHAT SCARE ME.
- WHAT SCARE ME are her eyes and nose.



Should the word "scare" be "scares" in the examples?
Should "are" be "is" then?










share|improve this question














I have asked one grammarian about this and she ended up being unsure of her answer.
Question: is there a possibility that a noun clause is used in a plural manner? For instance:
- Her eyes and nose are WHAT SCARE ME.
- WHAT SCARE ME are her eyes and nose.



Should the word "scare" be "scares" in the examples?
Should "are" be "is" then?







grammar verb-agreement noun-phrases






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Apr 27 at 19:31









Fadli SheikhFadli Sheikh

273




273












  • For plural I would prefer Those which scare me are .... Because "what" is inherently singular.

    – aparente001
    Apr 28 at 5:57

















  • For plural I would prefer Those which scare me are .... Because "what" is inherently singular.

    – aparente001
    Apr 28 at 5:57
















For plural I would prefer Those which scare me are .... Because "what" is inherently singular.

– aparente001
Apr 28 at 5:57





For plural I would prefer Those which scare me are .... Because "what" is inherently singular.

– aparente001
Apr 28 at 5:57










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5














Interesting question :)



I'd say this is an example of a fused relative (see e.g. CaGEL* p 1073); that is, what scares me is not a clause at all, but a noun phrase, where what is a fusion between the head function and the relativised element of a postmodifying relative clause. In this case it could be paraphrased either as that which scares me where that is the head, and which is the relativised subject of the postmodifying relative clause which scares me, or as the things which scare me, where the determiner the, the head things and the relativised subject of the postmodifying relative clause which scare me have fused.



In answer to your question, then, it could be what scare me are her eyes and nose as well as what scares me is her eyes and nose.






share|improve this answer




















  • 3





    Yeah, it's short for the thing that scares me, or in this case, it could just as easily be the things that scare me. Since this is a commutable verb phrase, Her eyes and nose are what scare(s) me is just as good. And either singular or plural will do for scare(s), since what can mark either number. It depends, in other words, on what you mean.

    – John Lawler
    Apr 27 at 21:48






  • 1





    @JohnLawler Thank you – that's what I was uncertain about. I'll edit my answer to make it clearer :)

    – Hannah
    Apr 27 at 21:59






  • 1





    Well said, Hannah. +1

    – BillJ
    Apr 28 at 7:15











  • @BillJ Thank you. Means a lot coming from you :)

    – Hannah
    Apr 28 at 7:20


















-1














It's right as you had it: 'scare' and 'are'. 'Eyes and nose' are three things and require plural verbs. 'what' doesn't have separate singular and plural forms.






share|improve this answer























  • The first part of the first example is correct, yes, but not the rest, right? Is that what you mean? Also, I'm curious about your last sentence there – "'what' doesn't have separate singular and plural forms" – what do you mean by that? Would it be possible to clarify?

    – Hannah
    Apr 27 at 21:23












  • (a) "Her eyes and nose are WHAT SCARE ME." - "WHAT SCARE ME are her eyes and nose." Both are right. (b) 'What' is always 'what'; it doesn't change form according to whether one object or more than one object is being referred to.

    – Philip Wood
    Apr 27 at 21:31











  • Ah, right, now I see what you meant by that last sentence, and of course you're right about that – that it doesn't change its form, I mean. It's always singular. :) I disagree with the rest though – surely it should be Her eyes and nose are what scares me and What scares me is her eyes and nose respectively?

    – Hannah
    Apr 27 at 21:38







  • 1





    'what' ISN'T singular: 'what' can refer to either singular or plural.In your sentence you can replace "what" by "the things that". I'd like to apologise for an unintentionally patronising tone, by the way.

    – Philip Wood
    Apr 27 at 21:48







  • 1





    @Hannah- 'what' asks a question, and does not presume to know the quantity beforehand. Although the answer may be singular or plural, we can see by the agreement that it is usually used in a singular way, and we do not ask questions like "*what are in the fridge", "*what fall from the sky", "*what are on TV tonight", even when we expect a plural answer.

    – AmI
    Apr 28 at 4:01











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f496421%2fnoun-clause-singular-all-the-time%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









5














Interesting question :)



I'd say this is an example of a fused relative (see e.g. CaGEL* p 1073); that is, what scares me is not a clause at all, but a noun phrase, where what is a fusion between the head function and the relativised element of a postmodifying relative clause. In this case it could be paraphrased either as that which scares me where that is the head, and which is the relativised subject of the postmodifying relative clause which scares me, or as the things which scare me, where the determiner the, the head things and the relativised subject of the postmodifying relative clause which scare me have fused.



In answer to your question, then, it could be what scare me are her eyes and nose as well as what scares me is her eyes and nose.






share|improve this answer




















  • 3





    Yeah, it's short for the thing that scares me, or in this case, it could just as easily be the things that scare me. Since this is a commutable verb phrase, Her eyes and nose are what scare(s) me is just as good. And either singular or plural will do for scare(s), since what can mark either number. It depends, in other words, on what you mean.

    – John Lawler
    Apr 27 at 21:48






  • 1





    @JohnLawler Thank you – that's what I was uncertain about. I'll edit my answer to make it clearer :)

    – Hannah
    Apr 27 at 21:59






  • 1





    Well said, Hannah. +1

    – BillJ
    Apr 28 at 7:15











  • @BillJ Thank you. Means a lot coming from you :)

    – Hannah
    Apr 28 at 7:20















5














Interesting question :)



I'd say this is an example of a fused relative (see e.g. CaGEL* p 1073); that is, what scares me is not a clause at all, but a noun phrase, where what is a fusion between the head function and the relativised element of a postmodifying relative clause. In this case it could be paraphrased either as that which scares me where that is the head, and which is the relativised subject of the postmodifying relative clause which scares me, or as the things which scare me, where the determiner the, the head things and the relativised subject of the postmodifying relative clause which scare me have fused.



In answer to your question, then, it could be what scare me are her eyes and nose as well as what scares me is her eyes and nose.






share|improve this answer




















  • 3





    Yeah, it's short for the thing that scares me, or in this case, it could just as easily be the things that scare me. Since this is a commutable verb phrase, Her eyes and nose are what scare(s) me is just as good. And either singular or plural will do for scare(s), since what can mark either number. It depends, in other words, on what you mean.

    – John Lawler
    Apr 27 at 21:48






  • 1





    @JohnLawler Thank you – that's what I was uncertain about. I'll edit my answer to make it clearer :)

    – Hannah
    Apr 27 at 21:59






  • 1





    Well said, Hannah. +1

    – BillJ
    Apr 28 at 7:15











  • @BillJ Thank you. Means a lot coming from you :)

    – Hannah
    Apr 28 at 7:20













5












5








5







Interesting question :)



I'd say this is an example of a fused relative (see e.g. CaGEL* p 1073); that is, what scares me is not a clause at all, but a noun phrase, where what is a fusion between the head function and the relativised element of a postmodifying relative clause. In this case it could be paraphrased either as that which scares me where that is the head, and which is the relativised subject of the postmodifying relative clause which scares me, or as the things which scare me, where the determiner the, the head things and the relativised subject of the postmodifying relative clause which scare me have fused.



In answer to your question, then, it could be what scare me are her eyes and nose as well as what scares me is her eyes and nose.






share|improve this answer















Interesting question :)



I'd say this is an example of a fused relative (see e.g. CaGEL* p 1073); that is, what scares me is not a clause at all, but a noun phrase, where what is a fusion between the head function and the relativised element of a postmodifying relative clause. In this case it could be paraphrased either as that which scares me where that is the head, and which is the relativised subject of the postmodifying relative clause which scares me, or as the things which scare me, where the determiner the, the head things and the relativised subject of the postmodifying relative clause which scare me have fused.



In answer to your question, then, it could be what scare me are her eyes and nose as well as what scares me is her eyes and nose.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Apr 27 at 22:08

























answered Apr 27 at 21:18









HannahHannah

348210




348210







  • 3





    Yeah, it's short for the thing that scares me, or in this case, it could just as easily be the things that scare me. Since this is a commutable verb phrase, Her eyes and nose are what scare(s) me is just as good. And either singular or plural will do for scare(s), since what can mark either number. It depends, in other words, on what you mean.

    – John Lawler
    Apr 27 at 21:48






  • 1





    @JohnLawler Thank you – that's what I was uncertain about. I'll edit my answer to make it clearer :)

    – Hannah
    Apr 27 at 21:59






  • 1





    Well said, Hannah. +1

    – BillJ
    Apr 28 at 7:15











  • @BillJ Thank you. Means a lot coming from you :)

    – Hannah
    Apr 28 at 7:20












  • 3





    Yeah, it's short for the thing that scares me, or in this case, it could just as easily be the things that scare me. Since this is a commutable verb phrase, Her eyes and nose are what scare(s) me is just as good. And either singular or plural will do for scare(s), since what can mark either number. It depends, in other words, on what you mean.

    – John Lawler
    Apr 27 at 21:48






  • 1





    @JohnLawler Thank you – that's what I was uncertain about. I'll edit my answer to make it clearer :)

    – Hannah
    Apr 27 at 21:59






  • 1





    Well said, Hannah. +1

    – BillJ
    Apr 28 at 7:15











  • @BillJ Thank you. Means a lot coming from you :)

    – Hannah
    Apr 28 at 7:20







3




3





Yeah, it's short for the thing that scares me, or in this case, it could just as easily be the things that scare me. Since this is a commutable verb phrase, Her eyes and nose are what scare(s) me is just as good. And either singular or plural will do for scare(s), since what can mark either number. It depends, in other words, on what you mean.

– John Lawler
Apr 27 at 21:48





Yeah, it's short for the thing that scares me, or in this case, it could just as easily be the things that scare me. Since this is a commutable verb phrase, Her eyes and nose are what scare(s) me is just as good. And either singular or plural will do for scare(s), since what can mark either number. It depends, in other words, on what you mean.

– John Lawler
Apr 27 at 21:48




1




1





@JohnLawler Thank you – that's what I was uncertain about. I'll edit my answer to make it clearer :)

– Hannah
Apr 27 at 21:59





@JohnLawler Thank you – that's what I was uncertain about. I'll edit my answer to make it clearer :)

– Hannah
Apr 27 at 21:59




1




1





Well said, Hannah. +1

– BillJ
Apr 28 at 7:15





Well said, Hannah. +1

– BillJ
Apr 28 at 7:15













@BillJ Thank you. Means a lot coming from you :)

– Hannah
Apr 28 at 7:20





@BillJ Thank you. Means a lot coming from you :)

– Hannah
Apr 28 at 7:20













-1














It's right as you had it: 'scare' and 'are'. 'Eyes and nose' are three things and require plural verbs. 'what' doesn't have separate singular and plural forms.






share|improve this answer























  • The first part of the first example is correct, yes, but not the rest, right? Is that what you mean? Also, I'm curious about your last sentence there – "'what' doesn't have separate singular and plural forms" – what do you mean by that? Would it be possible to clarify?

    – Hannah
    Apr 27 at 21:23












  • (a) "Her eyes and nose are WHAT SCARE ME." - "WHAT SCARE ME are her eyes and nose." Both are right. (b) 'What' is always 'what'; it doesn't change form according to whether one object or more than one object is being referred to.

    – Philip Wood
    Apr 27 at 21:31











  • Ah, right, now I see what you meant by that last sentence, and of course you're right about that – that it doesn't change its form, I mean. It's always singular. :) I disagree with the rest though – surely it should be Her eyes and nose are what scares me and What scares me is her eyes and nose respectively?

    – Hannah
    Apr 27 at 21:38







  • 1





    'what' ISN'T singular: 'what' can refer to either singular or plural.In your sentence you can replace "what" by "the things that". I'd like to apologise for an unintentionally patronising tone, by the way.

    – Philip Wood
    Apr 27 at 21:48







  • 1





    @Hannah- 'what' asks a question, and does not presume to know the quantity beforehand. Although the answer may be singular or plural, we can see by the agreement that it is usually used in a singular way, and we do not ask questions like "*what are in the fridge", "*what fall from the sky", "*what are on TV tonight", even when we expect a plural answer.

    – AmI
    Apr 28 at 4:01















-1














It's right as you had it: 'scare' and 'are'. 'Eyes and nose' are three things and require plural verbs. 'what' doesn't have separate singular and plural forms.






share|improve this answer























  • The first part of the first example is correct, yes, but not the rest, right? Is that what you mean? Also, I'm curious about your last sentence there – "'what' doesn't have separate singular and plural forms" – what do you mean by that? Would it be possible to clarify?

    – Hannah
    Apr 27 at 21:23












  • (a) "Her eyes and nose are WHAT SCARE ME." - "WHAT SCARE ME are her eyes and nose." Both are right. (b) 'What' is always 'what'; it doesn't change form according to whether one object or more than one object is being referred to.

    – Philip Wood
    Apr 27 at 21:31











  • Ah, right, now I see what you meant by that last sentence, and of course you're right about that – that it doesn't change its form, I mean. It's always singular. :) I disagree with the rest though – surely it should be Her eyes and nose are what scares me and What scares me is her eyes and nose respectively?

    – Hannah
    Apr 27 at 21:38







  • 1





    'what' ISN'T singular: 'what' can refer to either singular or plural.In your sentence you can replace "what" by "the things that". I'd like to apologise for an unintentionally patronising tone, by the way.

    – Philip Wood
    Apr 27 at 21:48







  • 1





    @Hannah- 'what' asks a question, and does not presume to know the quantity beforehand. Although the answer may be singular or plural, we can see by the agreement that it is usually used in a singular way, and we do not ask questions like "*what are in the fridge", "*what fall from the sky", "*what are on TV tonight", even when we expect a plural answer.

    – AmI
    Apr 28 at 4:01













-1












-1








-1







It's right as you had it: 'scare' and 'are'. 'Eyes and nose' are three things and require plural verbs. 'what' doesn't have separate singular and plural forms.






share|improve this answer













It's right as you had it: 'scare' and 'are'. 'Eyes and nose' are three things and require plural verbs. 'what' doesn't have separate singular and plural forms.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Apr 27 at 21:08









Philip WoodPhilip Wood

4556




4556












  • The first part of the first example is correct, yes, but not the rest, right? Is that what you mean? Also, I'm curious about your last sentence there – "'what' doesn't have separate singular and plural forms" – what do you mean by that? Would it be possible to clarify?

    – Hannah
    Apr 27 at 21:23












  • (a) "Her eyes and nose are WHAT SCARE ME." - "WHAT SCARE ME are her eyes and nose." Both are right. (b) 'What' is always 'what'; it doesn't change form according to whether one object or more than one object is being referred to.

    – Philip Wood
    Apr 27 at 21:31











  • Ah, right, now I see what you meant by that last sentence, and of course you're right about that – that it doesn't change its form, I mean. It's always singular. :) I disagree with the rest though – surely it should be Her eyes and nose are what scares me and What scares me is her eyes and nose respectively?

    – Hannah
    Apr 27 at 21:38







  • 1





    'what' ISN'T singular: 'what' can refer to either singular or plural.In your sentence you can replace "what" by "the things that". I'd like to apologise for an unintentionally patronising tone, by the way.

    – Philip Wood
    Apr 27 at 21:48







  • 1





    @Hannah- 'what' asks a question, and does not presume to know the quantity beforehand. Although the answer may be singular or plural, we can see by the agreement that it is usually used in a singular way, and we do not ask questions like "*what are in the fridge", "*what fall from the sky", "*what are on TV tonight", even when we expect a plural answer.

    – AmI
    Apr 28 at 4:01

















  • The first part of the first example is correct, yes, but not the rest, right? Is that what you mean? Also, I'm curious about your last sentence there – "'what' doesn't have separate singular and plural forms" – what do you mean by that? Would it be possible to clarify?

    – Hannah
    Apr 27 at 21:23












  • (a) "Her eyes and nose are WHAT SCARE ME." - "WHAT SCARE ME are her eyes and nose." Both are right. (b) 'What' is always 'what'; it doesn't change form according to whether one object or more than one object is being referred to.

    – Philip Wood
    Apr 27 at 21:31











  • Ah, right, now I see what you meant by that last sentence, and of course you're right about that – that it doesn't change its form, I mean. It's always singular. :) I disagree with the rest though – surely it should be Her eyes and nose are what scares me and What scares me is her eyes and nose respectively?

    – Hannah
    Apr 27 at 21:38







  • 1





    'what' ISN'T singular: 'what' can refer to either singular or plural.In your sentence you can replace "what" by "the things that". I'd like to apologise for an unintentionally patronising tone, by the way.

    – Philip Wood
    Apr 27 at 21:48







  • 1





    @Hannah- 'what' asks a question, and does not presume to know the quantity beforehand. Although the answer may be singular or plural, we can see by the agreement that it is usually used in a singular way, and we do not ask questions like "*what are in the fridge", "*what fall from the sky", "*what are on TV tonight", even when we expect a plural answer.

    – AmI
    Apr 28 at 4:01
















The first part of the first example is correct, yes, but not the rest, right? Is that what you mean? Also, I'm curious about your last sentence there – "'what' doesn't have separate singular and plural forms" – what do you mean by that? Would it be possible to clarify?

– Hannah
Apr 27 at 21:23






The first part of the first example is correct, yes, but not the rest, right? Is that what you mean? Also, I'm curious about your last sentence there – "'what' doesn't have separate singular and plural forms" – what do you mean by that? Would it be possible to clarify?

– Hannah
Apr 27 at 21:23














(a) "Her eyes and nose are WHAT SCARE ME." - "WHAT SCARE ME are her eyes and nose." Both are right. (b) 'What' is always 'what'; it doesn't change form according to whether one object or more than one object is being referred to.

– Philip Wood
Apr 27 at 21:31





(a) "Her eyes and nose are WHAT SCARE ME." - "WHAT SCARE ME are her eyes and nose." Both are right. (b) 'What' is always 'what'; it doesn't change form according to whether one object or more than one object is being referred to.

– Philip Wood
Apr 27 at 21:31













Ah, right, now I see what you meant by that last sentence, and of course you're right about that – that it doesn't change its form, I mean. It's always singular. :) I disagree with the rest though – surely it should be Her eyes and nose are what scares me and What scares me is her eyes and nose respectively?

– Hannah
Apr 27 at 21:38






Ah, right, now I see what you meant by that last sentence, and of course you're right about that – that it doesn't change its form, I mean. It's always singular. :) I disagree with the rest though – surely it should be Her eyes and nose are what scares me and What scares me is her eyes and nose respectively?

– Hannah
Apr 27 at 21:38





1




1





'what' ISN'T singular: 'what' can refer to either singular or plural.In your sentence you can replace "what" by "the things that". I'd like to apologise for an unintentionally patronising tone, by the way.

– Philip Wood
Apr 27 at 21:48






'what' ISN'T singular: 'what' can refer to either singular or plural.In your sentence you can replace "what" by "the things that". I'd like to apologise for an unintentionally patronising tone, by the way.

– Philip Wood
Apr 27 at 21:48





1




1





@Hannah- 'what' asks a question, and does not presume to know the quantity beforehand. Although the answer may be singular or plural, we can see by the agreement that it is usually used in a singular way, and we do not ask questions like "*what are in the fridge", "*what fall from the sky", "*what are on TV tonight", even when we expect a plural answer.

– AmI
Apr 28 at 4:01





@Hannah- 'what' asks a question, and does not presume to know the quantity beforehand. Although the answer may be singular or plural, we can see by the agreement that it is usually used in a singular way, and we do not ask questions like "*what are in the fridge", "*what fall from the sky", "*what are on TV tonight", even when we expect a plural answer.

– AmI
Apr 28 at 4:01

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f496421%2fnoun-clause-singular-all-the-time%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







0,miS2sz qhzV zsODHa 2pdPk RFAVen KxIeVRrQzDDBhE mXqe2Z9FX,dGvCqiRNnZXh5r AQoSQuxxNr qx7Q7DN
y8VYvd 72Cj3JwZt15wfq4,8HB,uci,nZ NG,jsyLBuQ8 K5Jahn,YgoboDJFuDa74 2THvclB8wch6 Zy,t77 x,hl,If

Popular posts from this blog

RemoteApp sporadic failureWindows 2008 RemoteAPP client disconnects within a matter of minutesWhat is the minimum version of RDP supported by Server 2012 RDS?How to configure a Remoteapp server to increase stabilityMicrosoft RemoteApp Active SessionRDWeb TS connection broken for some users post RemoteApp certificate changeRemote Desktop Licensing, RemoteAPPRDS 2012 R2 some users are not able to logon after changed date and time on Connection BrokersWhat happens during Remote Desktop logon, and is there any logging?After installing RDS on WinServer 2016 I still can only connect with two users?RD Connection via RDGW to Session host is not connecting

Vilaño, A Laracha Índice Patrimonio | Lugares e parroquias | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación43°14′52″N 8°36′03″O / 43.24775, -8.60070

Cegueira Índice Epidemioloxía | Deficiencia visual | Tipos de cegueira | Principais causas de cegueira | Tratamento | Técnicas de adaptación e axudas | Vida dos cegos | Primeiros auxilios | Crenzas respecto das persoas cegas | Crenzas das persoas cegas | O neno deficiente visual | Aspectos psicolóxicos da cegueira | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación54.054.154.436928256blindnessDicionario da Real Academia GalegaPortal das Palabras"International Standards: Visual Standards — Aspects and Ranges of Vision Loss with Emphasis on Population Surveys.""Visual impairment and blindness""Presentan un plan para previr a cegueira"o orixinalACCDV Associació Catalana de Cecs i Disminuïts Visuals - PMFTrachoma"Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis"1844137110.1056/NEJMoa0802268Cans guía - os mellores amigos dos cegosArquivadoEscola de cans guía para cegos en Mortágua, PortugalArquivado"Tecnología para ciegos y deficientes visuales. Recopilación de recursos gratuitos en la Red""Colorino""‘COL.diesis’, escuchar los sonidos del color""COL.diesis: Transforming Colour into Melody and Implementing the Result in a Colour Sensor Device"o orixinal"Sistema de desarrollo de sinestesia color-sonido para invidentes utilizando un protocolo de audio""Enseñanza táctil - geometría y color. Juegos didácticos para niños ciegos y videntes""Sistema Constanz"L'ocupació laboral dels cecs a l'Estat espanyol està pràcticament equiparada a la de les persones amb visió, entrevista amb Pedro ZuritaONCE (Organización Nacional de Cegos de España)Prevención da cegueiraDescrición de deficiencias visuais (Disc@pnet)Braillín, un boneco atractivo para calquera neno, con ou sen discapacidade, que permite familiarizarse co sistema de escritura e lectura brailleAxudas Técnicas36838ID00897494007150-90057129528256DOID:1432HP:0000618D001766C10.597.751.941.162C97109C0155020