Is the 5 MB static resource size limit 5,242,880 bytes or 5,000,000 bytes?Testing callout with zipped static resourceIs it Possible to access SDK From Static Resource?Is there anything wrong with using Static Resource URL without the timestamp?accessing static resource in apexReferencing Static Resource Images in a visualforce pageNeed to call 2 static resources in CSS and Visualforce PageWhy is this Static Resource dynamic reference not working?Static resource stops working on compressionHow can I access the html text in static resource file in lightning client-side controller?Can Static-Resource Files be Listed via Apex?
Hostile Divisor Numbers
Transistor gain, what if there is not enough current?
Why doesn't a particle exert force on itself?
What detail can Hubble see on Mars?
Was there a dinosaur-counter in the original Jurassic Park movie?
Append unique characters read from filecontents to a string
Can anyone identify this unknown 1988 PC card from The Palantir Corporation?
How can I obtain and work with a Platonic dodecahedron?
Why increasing of the temperature of the objects like wood, paper etc. doesn't fire them?
Can an Iranian citizen enter the USA on a Dutch passport?
Why is the blank symbol not considered part of the input alphabet of a Turing machine?
Is it normal for gliders not to have attitude indicators?
Python 3 - simple temperature program version 1.3
My large rocket is still flipping over
Copper as an adjective to refer to something made of copper
Explaining intravenous drug abuse to a small child
Is crescere the correct word meaning to to grow or cultivate?
Primes in a Diamond
Has the United States ever had a non-Christian President?
What is the thing used to help pouring liquids called?
Dimmer switch not connected to ground
Make me a minimum magic sum
What does のそ mean on this picture?
Is there a reason why Turkey took the Balkan territories of the Ottoman Empire, instead of Greece or another of the Balkan states?
Is the 5 MB static resource size limit 5,242,880 bytes or 5,000,000 bytes?
Testing callout with zipped static resourceIs it Possible to access SDK From Static Resource?Is there anything wrong with using Static Resource URL without the timestamp?accessing static resource in apexReferencing Static Resource Images in a visualforce pageNeed to call 2 static resources in CSS and Visualforce PageWhy is this Static Resource dynamic reference not working?Static resource stops working on compressionHow can I access the html text in static resource file in lightning client-side controller?Can Static-Resource Files be Listed via Apex?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
Documentation such as Static Resources says:
A single static resource can be up to 5 MB in size. An organization
can have up to 250 MB of static resources.
We have one growing static resource of size 4,950,663 bytes, so it would be good to know whether the limit is 5,242,880 bytes or 5,000,000 bytes.
static-resources
asked Apr 27 at 17:03
Keith CKeith C
97.7k1197224
add a comment |
Documentation such as Static Resources says:
A single static resource can be up to 5 MB in size. An organization
can have up to 250 MB of static resources.
We have one growing static resource of size 4,950,663 bytes, so it would be good to know whether the limit is 5,242,880 bytes or 5,000,000 bytes.
static-resources
asked Apr 27 at 17:03
Keith CKeith C
97.7k1197224
add a comment |
Documentation such as Static Resources says:
A single static resource can be up to 5 MB in size. An organization
can have up to 250 MB of static resources.
We have one growing static resource of size 4,950,663 bytes, so it would be good to know whether the limit is 5,242,880 bytes or 5,000,000 bytes.
static-resources
asked Apr 27 at 17:03
Keith CKeith C
97.7k1197224
Documentation such as Static Resources says:
A single static resource can be up to 5 MB in size. An organization
can have up to 250 MB of static resources.
We have one growing static resource of size 4,950,663 bytes, so it would be good to know whether the limit is 5,242,880 bytes or 5,000,000 bytes.
static-resources
static-resources
asked Apr 27 at 17:03
Keith CKeith C
97.7k1197224
asked Apr 27 at 17:03
Keith CKeith C
97.7k1197224
edited Apr 27 at 19:19
Keith C
asked Apr 27 at 17:03
Keith CKeith C
97.7k1197224
asked Apr 27 at 17:03
Keith CKeith C
97.7k1197224
asked Apr 27 at 17:03
Keith CKeith C
97.7k1197224
97.7k1197224
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
It's 5,000,000 bytes. In Salesforce, all storage units are per SI units, where megabyte means 1,000,000, and mebibyte means 1,048,576. Nowhere in Salesforce are the SI units for kibibyte/mebibyte/gibibyte, etc used in the documentation explicitly. Good luck finding this explicitly mentioned in the documentation, but note that this trend is consistent across all such limits (6MB Apex code, 10MB Custom Settings, etc). The rare exception to this rule are the field size limits (e.g. 32KB is 32,767 characters).
answered Apr 27 at 17:16
sfdcfoxsfdcfox
269k13214463
Thanks and for the broadness of the answer too. So we only have 49,337 bytes to spare...
– Keith C
Apr 27 at 17:46
1
As an addendum, this tends to be a general rule -- kibibytes are technically written KiB, mebibytes MiB, gibibytes GiB; as opposed to KB, MB, GB.
– Aza
Apr 27 at 21:53
@Aza It's not as general as a rule as you'd like to think. If it were, there wouldn't be such confusion over it. Look at the file sizes on a Microsoft system, for example, or the actual number of bytes of RAM in your 1GB DDR memory module. Computers are inherently base-2 devices in most cases, so the binary representation actually makes more sense. Programmers tend to be more base-2 oriented, engineers more base-10 oriented. One can't assume MB is decimal or binary without context, even 20+ years after the standardization.
– sfdcfox
May 2 at 11:04
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "459"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f260296%2fis-the-5-mb-static-resource-size-limit-5-242-880-bytes-or-5-000-000-bytes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It's 5,000,000 bytes. In Salesforce, all storage units are per SI units, where megabyte means 1,000,000, and mebibyte means 1,048,576. Nowhere in Salesforce are the SI units for kibibyte/mebibyte/gibibyte, etc used in the documentation explicitly. Good luck finding this explicitly mentioned in the documentation, but note that this trend is consistent across all such limits (6MB Apex code, 10MB Custom Settings, etc). The rare exception to this rule are the field size limits (e.g. 32KB is 32,767 characters).
answered Apr 27 at 17:16
sfdcfoxsfdcfox
269k13214463
Thanks and for the broadness of the answer too. So we only have 49,337 bytes to spare...
– Keith C
Apr 27 at 17:46
1
As an addendum, this tends to be a general rule -- kibibytes are technically written KiB, mebibytes MiB, gibibytes GiB; as opposed to KB, MB, GB.
– Aza
Apr 27 at 21:53
@Aza It's not as general as a rule as you'd like to think. If it were, there wouldn't be such confusion over it. Look at the file sizes on a Microsoft system, for example, or the actual number of bytes of RAM in your 1GB DDR memory module. Computers are inherently base-2 devices in most cases, so the binary representation actually makes more sense. Programmers tend to be more base-2 oriented, engineers more base-10 oriented. One can't assume MB is decimal or binary without context, even 20+ years after the standardization.
– sfdcfox
May 2 at 11:04
add a comment |
It's 5,000,000 bytes. In Salesforce, all storage units are per SI units, where megabyte means 1,000,000, and mebibyte means 1,048,576. Nowhere in Salesforce are the SI units for kibibyte/mebibyte/gibibyte, etc used in the documentation explicitly. Good luck finding this explicitly mentioned in the documentation, but note that this trend is consistent across all such limits (6MB Apex code, 10MB Custom Settings, etc). The rare exception to this rule are the field size limits (e.g. 32KB is 32,767 characters).
answered Apr 27 at 17:16
sfdcfoxsfdcfox
269k13214463
Thanks and for the broadness of the answer too. So we only have 49,337 bytes to spare...
– Keith C
Apr 27 at 17:46
1
As an addendum, this tends to be a general rule -- kibibytes are technically written KiB, mebibytes MiB, gibibytes GiB; as opposed to KB, MB, GB.
– Aza
Apr 27 at 21:53
@Aza It's not as general as a rule as you'd like to think. If it were, there wouldn't be such confusion over it. Look at the file sizes on a Microsoft system, for example, or the actual number of bytes of RAM in your 1GB DDR memory module. Computers are inherently base-2 devices in most cases, so the binary representation actually makes more sense. Programmers tend to be more base-2 oriented, engineers more base-10 oriented. One can't assume MB is decimal or binary without context, even 20+ years after the standardization.
– sfdcfox
May 2 at 11:04
add a comment |
It's 5,000,000 bytes. In Salesforce, all storage units are per SI units, where megabyte means 1,000,000, and mebibyte means 1,048,576. Nowhere in Salesforce are the SI units for kibibyte/mebibyte/gibibyte, etc used in the documentation explicitly. Good luck finding this explicitly mentioned in the documentation, but note that this trend is consistent across all such limits (6MB Apex code, 10MB Custom Settings, etc). The rare exception to this rule are the field size limits (e.g. 32KB is 32,767 characters).
answered Apr 27 at 17:16
sfdcfoxsfdcfox
269k13214463
It's 5,000,000 bytes. In Salesforce, all storage units are per SI units, where megabyte means 1,000,000, and mebibyte means 1,048,576. Nowhere in Salesforce are the SI units for kibibyte/mebibyte/gibibyte, etc used in the documentation explicitly. Good luck finding this explicitly mentioned in the documentation, but note that this trend is consistent across all such limits (6MB Apex code, 10MB Custom Settings, etc). The rare exception to this rule are the field size limits (e.g. 32KB is 32,767 characters).
answered Apr 27 at 17:16
sfdcfoxsfdcfox
269k13214463
answered Apr 27 at 17:16
sfdcfoxsfdcfox
269k13214463
answered Apr 27 at 17:16
sfdcfoxsfdcfox
269k13214463
answered Apr 27 at 17:16
sfdcfoxsfdcfox
269k13214463
269k13214463
Thanks and for the broadness of the answer too. So we only have 49,337 bytes to spare...
– Keith C
Apr 27 at 17:46
1
As an addendum, this tends to be a general rule -- kibibytes are technically written KiB, mebibytes MiB, gibibytes GiB; as opposed to KB, MB, GB.
– Aza
Apr 27 at 21:53
@Aza It's not as general as a rule as you'd like to think. If it were, there wouldn't be such confusion over it. Look at the file sizes on a Microsoft system, for example, or the actual number of bytes of RAM in your 1GB DDR memory module. Computers are inherently base-2 devices in most cases, so the binary representation actually makes more sense. Programmers tend to be more base-2 oriented, engineers more base-10 oriented. One can't assume MB is decimal or binary without context, even 20+ years after the standardization.
– sfdcfox
May 2 at 11:04
add a comment |
Thanks and for the broadness of the answer too. So we only have 49,337 bytes to spare...
– Keith C
Apr 27 at 17:46
1
As an addendum, this tends to be a general rule -- kibibytes are technically written KiB, mebibytes MiB, gibibytes GiB; as opposed to KB, MB, GB.
– Aza
Apr 27 at 21:53
@Aza It's not as general as a rule as you'd like to think. If it were, there wouldn't be such confusion over it. Look at the file sizes on a Microsoft system, for example, or the actual number of bytes of RAM in your 1GB DDR memory module. Computers are inherently base-2 devices in most cases, so the binary representation actually makes more sense. Programmers tend to be more base-2 oriented, engineers more base-10 oriented. One can't assume MB is decimal or binary without context, even 20+ years after the standardization.
– sfdcfox
May 2 at 11:04
Thanks and for the broadness of the answer too. So we only have 49,337 bytes to spare...
– Keith C
Apr 27 at 17:46
Thanks and for the broadness of the answer too. So we only have 49,337 bytes to spare...
– Keith C
Apr 27 at 17:46
1
1
As an addendum, this tends to be a general rule -- kibibytes are technically written KiB, mebibytes MiB, gibibytes GiB; as opposed to KB, MB, GB.
– Aza
Apr 27 at 21:53
As an addendum, this tends to be a general rule -- kibibytes are technically written KiB, mebibytes MiB, gibibytes GiB; as opposed to KB, MB, GB.
– Aza
Apr 27 at 21:53
@Aza It's not as general as a rule as you'd like to think. If it were, there wouldn't be such confusion over it. Look at the file sizes on a Microsoft system, for example, or the actual number of bytes of RAM in your 1GB DDR memory module. Computers are inherently base-2 devices in most cases, so the binary representation actually makes more sense. Programmers tend to be more base-2 oriented, engineers more base-10 oriented. One can't assume MB is decimal or binary without context, even 20+ years after the standardization.
– sfdcfox
May 2 at 11:04
@Aza It's not as general as a rule as you'd like to think. If it were, there wouldn't be such confusion over it. Look at the file sizes on a Microsoft system, for example, or the actual number of bytes of RAM in your 1GB DDR memory module. Computers are inherently base-2 devices in most cases, so the binary representation actually makes more sense. Programmers tend to be more base-2 oriented, engineers more base-10 oriented. One can't assume MB is decimal or binary without context, even 20+ years after the standardization.
– sfdcfox
May 2 at 11:04
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Salesforce Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f260296%2fis-the-5-mb-static-resource-size-limit-5-242-880-bytes-or-5-000-000-bytes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
