How to calculate the node voltages for this circuit using the voltage divider ruleCircuit Nodal VoltageFormat Approach to NODAL ANALYSISIs it safe to use a voltage divider for Arduino and DC motor controller?How to solve this resistive network using divider rules and ohms lawTransfer function in a 2L2C circuitT-Feedback Circuit Vo/Vi (Why is my approach wrong)?Analysis of a VDB circuitArduino Nano: How to decide voltage divider values that are safe for the input of the ADCRelation between Output voltage and current in a transresistance amplifierhow to calculate voltage divider

Two researchers want to work on the same extension to my paper. Who to help?

How to make the table in the figure in LaTeX?

International Code of Ethics for order of co-authors in research papers

How does Howard Stark know this?

Can you book a one-way ticket to the UK on a visa?

Noob at soldering, can anyone explain why my circuit won't work?

Ex-manager wants to stay in touch, I don't want to

Is there enough time to Planar Bind a creature conjured by a 1-hour-duration spell?

Why can't RGB or bicolour LEDs produce a decent yellow?

How to slow yourself down (for playing nice with others)

How to make a language evolve quickly?

Are there variations of the regular runtimes of the Big-O-Notation?

Cropping a message using array splits

What is the best way for a skeleton to impersonate human without using magic?

What can cause a never-frozen indoor copper drain pipe to crack?

find not returning expected files

Exception propagation: When to catch exceptions?

How to align underlines in a cases environment

How could we transfer large amounts of energy sourced in space to Earth?

"Right on the tip of my tongue" meaning?

Is it a bad idea to replace pull-up resistors with hard pull-ups?

Is a diamond sword feasible?

Can 'sudo apt-get remove [write]' destroy my Ubuntu?

How can a Lich look like a human without magic?



How to calculate the node voltages for this circuit using the voltage divider rule


Circuit Nodal VoltageFormat Approach to NODAL ANALYSISIs it safe to use a voltage divider for Arduino and DC motor controller?How to solve this resistive network using divider rules and ohms lawTransfer function in a 2L2C circuitT-Feedback Circuit Vo/Vi (Why is my approach wrong)?Analysis of a VDB circuitArduino Nano: How to decide voltage divider values that are safe for the input of the ADCRelation between Output voltage and current in a transresistance amplifierhow to calculate voltage divider






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2












$begingroup$


I am working on the following circuit:
enter image description here

Simplifying the circuit:
enter image description here
After simplifying, my answers do not match that of values I get from simulating the circuit in multisim. Here's my calculation:
$$Voltage V_B$$
$$V_B=6(frac50005000+(32.35714286times10^3))$$
$$V_B=0.8030592734V$$
$$6-0.8030592734=5.20V$$

$$Voltage Vc$$
$$V_c=5.2(frac(32.35714286times10^3)5000+(32.35714286times10^3))$$
$$V_c=4.50V$$


The simulations I did on multisim show that the voltages for Vb and Vc are:
$$V_B=5.161V$$
$$V_c=5.035V$$


I don't know if its the simplification I'm doing wrong or my approach towards the voltage divider rule. I need help.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Your first circuit has a resistor between C and ground, but your 2nd does not, so they are certainly not equivalent.
    $endgroup$
    – The Photon
    May 1 at 15:21

















2












$begingroup$


I am working on the following circuit:
enter image description here

Simplifying the circuit:
enter image description here
After simplifying, my answers do not match that of values I get from simulating the circuit in multisim. Here's my calculation:
$$Voltage V_B$$
$$V_B=6(frac50005000+(32.35714286times10^3))$$
$$V_B=0.8030592734V$$
$$6-0.8030592734=5.20V$$

$$Voltage Vc$$
$$V_c=5.2(frac(32.35714286times10^3)5000+(32.35714286times10^3))$$
$$V_c=4.50V$$


The simulations I did on multisim show that the voltages for Vb and Vc are:
$$V_B=5.161V$$
$$V_c=5.035V$$


I don't know if its the simplification I'm doing wrong or my approach towards the voltage divider rule. I need help.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Your first circuit has a resistor between C and ground, but your 2nd does not, so they are certainly not equivalent.
    $endgroup$
    – The Photon
    May 1 at 15:21













2












2








2





$begingroup$


I am working on the following circuit:
enter image description here

Simplifying the circuit:
enter image description here
After simplifying, my answers do not match that of values I get from simulating the circuit in multisim. Here's my calculation:
$$Voltage V_B$$
$$V_B=6(frac50005000+(32.35714286times10^3))$$
$$V_B=0.8030592734V$$
$$6-0.8030592734=5.20V$$

$$Voltage Vc$$
$$V_c=5.2(frac(32.35714286times10^3)5000+(32.35714286times10^3))$$
$$V_c=4.50V$$


The simulations I did on multisim show that the voltages for Vb and Vc are:
$$V_B=5.161V$$
$$V_c=5.035V$$


I don't know if its the simplification I'm doing wrong or my approach towards the voltage divider rule. I need help.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




I am working on the following circuit:
enter image description here

Simplifying the circuit:
enter image description here
After simplifying, my answers do not match that of values I get from simulating the circuit in multisim. Here's my calculation:
$$Voltage V_B$$
$$V_B=6(frac50005000+(32.35714286times10^3))$$
$$V_B=0.8030592734V$$
$$6-0.8030592734=5.20V$$

$$Voltage Vc$$
$$V_c=5.2(frac(32.35714286times10^3)5000+(32.35714286times10^3))$$
$$V_c=4.50V$$


The simulations I did on multisim show that the voltages for Vb and Vc are:
$$V_B=5.161V$$
$$V_c=5.035V$$


I don't know if its the simplification I'm doing wrong or my approach towards the voltage divider rule. I need help.







circuit-analysis voltage-divider






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked May 1 at 15:14









AugieJavax98AugieJavax98

1315




1315







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Your first circuit has a resistor between C and ground, but your 2nd does not, so they are certainly not equivalent.
    $endgroup$
    – The Photon
    May 1 at 15:21












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Your first circuit has a resistor between C and ground, but your 2nd does not, so they are certainly not equivalent.
    $endgroup$
    – The Photon
    May 1 at 15:21







2




2




$begingroup$
Your first circuit has a resistor between C and ground, but your 2nd does not, so they are certainly not equivalent.
$endgroup$
– The Photon
May 1 at 15:21




$begingroup$
Your first circuit has a resistor between C and ground, but your 2nd does not, so they are certainly not equivalent.
$endgroup$
– The Photon
May 1 at 15:21










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Your first circuit has a resistor between C and GND. You seem to have added it to your bottom resistor. You also seem to have your 1k||3k resistor calculation incorrect. 3k*1k/3k+1k is 750 ohms. Thus you should end up with a circuit like this:





schematic





simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab



From here, it is simpler to do Ohms Law to find the current in the circuit, then find the voltage drops of all the resistors.



If you must use the voltage divider rule, then you need to know if you are finding the voltage drop(s) across the resistor(s), or the voltage at the points with respect to GND, because that will make a difference to how you calculate it.



Of course, you always have the option to simplify to 2 resistors with the R2 component in the voltage divider as (R2+R3) too. It depends what your task is.



Another thing I noticed is you used your answer from Vb as your input voltage for your second divider equation. You should still use 6V as the supply for both equations. If you do that, you'll end up calculating answers that agree with your simulation.



I ended up with Vb = 5.1608V and Vc = 5.035V






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    I am asked to calculate the node voltages for B and C using the voltage divider rule
    $endgroup$
    – AugieJavax98
    May 1 at 15:44










  • $begingroup$
    So that's the node voltages with respect to GND I assume? In that case, it should be fairly straightforward now. You have demonstrated you know the voltage divider rule. Simplify the circuit to how I have it and apply it again, You should get answers that match your simulation, as I did
    $endgroup$
    – MCG
    May 1 at 15:50










  • $begingroup$
    Yes it is with respect to GND. I will try again.
    $endgroup$
    – AugieJavax98
    May 1 at 15:55










  • $begingroup$
    When I get the answer from the divider equation, I have to subtract it from the source voltage right?
    $endgroup$
    – AugieJavax98
    May 1 at 16:00










  • $begingroup$
    No, you do the normal voltage divider equation, and you get your answer. You don't have to subtract anything from the source. You should get answers that match your sims
    $endgroup$
    – MCG
    May 1 at 16:01


















2












$begingroup$

The calculation for 1k and 3k resistors looks wrong:



$R_eq=frac1frac11000+frac13000=frac3000*10001000+3000=750Omega$






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    R8 is missing as well..
    $endgroup$
    – Eugene Sh.
    May 1 at 15:20










  • $begingroup$
    R8 got rolled into the 32k, the total for all three would be 30.75k
    $endgroup$
    – laptop2d
    May 1 at 15:21











  • $begingroup$
    Well, then it can't have BC voltage
    $endgroup$
    – Eugene Sh.
    May 1 at 15:22










  • $begingroup$
    I see your point
    $endgroup$
    – laptop2d
    May 1 at 15:22


















2












$begingroup$

First off, you incorrectly reduced the combination of 1k||3k to 2.35k. This is incorrect on it's face since whenever you have resistors in parallel, the combined resistance is less than either resistance. You should use the formula (1/R1 + 1/R2 + ... + 1/Rn)^-1 to reduce the parallel circuit. When this is applied you get a more reasonable value of 750.



Second, you mislabeled node C. On the top circuit it is the node between R6||R7 and R8. On the bottom circuit, it is tied to ground.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
    StackExchange.schematics.init();
    );
    , "cicuitlab");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "135"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f436409%2fhow-to-calculate-the-node-voltages-for-this-circuit-using-the-voltage-divider-ru%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3












    $begingroup$

    Your first circuit has a resistor between C and GND. You seem to have added it to your bottom resistor. You also seem to have your 1k||3k resistor calculation incorrect. 3k*1k/3k+1k is 750 ohms. Thus you should end up with a circuit like this:





    schematic





    simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab



    From here, it is simpler to do Ohms Law to find the current in the circuit, then find the voltage drops of all the resistors.



    If you must use the voltage divider rule, then you need to know if you are finding the voltage drop(s) across the resistor(s), or the voltage at the points with respect to GND, because that will make a difference to how you calculate it.



    Of course, you always have the option to simplify to 2 resistors with the R2 component in the voltage divider as (R2+R3) too. It depends what your task is.



    Another thing I noticed is you used your answer from Vb as your input voltage for your second divider equation. You should still use 6V as the supply for both equations. If you do that, you'll end up calculating answers that agree with your simulation.



    I ended up with Vb = 5.1608V and Vc = 5.035V






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      I am asked to calculate the node voltages for B and C using the voltage divider rule
      $endgroup$
      – AugieJavax98
      May 1 at 15:44










    • $begingroup$
      So that's the node voltages with respect to GND I assume? In that case, it should be fairly straightforward now. You have demonstrated you know the voltage divider rule. Simplify the circuit to how I have it and apply it again, You should get answers that match your simulation, as I did
      $endgroup$
      – MCG
      May 1 at 15:50










    • $begingroup$
      Yes it is with respect to GND. I will try again.
      $endgroup$
      – AugieJavax98
      May 1 at 15:55










    • $begingroup$
      When I get the answer from the divider equation, I have to subtract it from the source voltage right?
      $endgroup$
      – AugieJavax98
      May 1 at 16:00










    • $begingroup$
      No, you do the normal voltage divider equation, and you get your answer. You don't have to subtract anything from the source. You should get answers that match your sims
      $endgroup$
      – MCG
      May 1 at 16:01















    3












    $begingroup$

    Your first circuit has a resistor between C and GND. You seem to have added it to your bottom resistor. You also seem to have your 1k||3k resistor calculation incorrect. 3k*1k/3k+1k is 750 ohms. Thus you should end up with a circuit like this:





    schematic





    simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab



    From here, it is simpler to do Ohms Law to find the current in the circuit, then find the voltage drops of all the resistors.



    If you must use the voltage divider rule, then you need to know if you are finding the voltage drop(s) across the resistor(s), or the voltage at the points with respect to GND, because that will make a difference to how you calculate it.



    Of course, you always have the option to simplify to 2 resistors with the R2 component in the voltage divider as (R2+R3) too. It depends what your task is.



    Another thing I noticed is you used your answer from Vb as your input voltage for your second divider equation. You should still use 6V as the supply for both equations. If you do that, you'll end up calculating answers that agree with your simulation.



    I ended up with Vb = 5.1608V and Vc = 5.035V






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      I am asked to calculate the node voltages for B and C using the voltage divider rule
      $endgroup$
      – AugieJavax98
      May 1 at 15:44










    • $begingroup$
      So that's the node voltages with respect to GND I assume? In that case, it should be fairly straightforward now. You have demonstrated you know the voltage divider rule. Simplify the circuit to how I have it and apply it again, You should get answers that match your simulation, as I did
      $endgroup$
      – MCG
      May 1 at 15:50










    • $begingroup$
      Yes it is with respect to GND. I will try again.
      $endgroup$
      – AugieJavax98
      May 1 at 15:55










    • $begingroup$
      When I get the answer from the divider equation, I have to subtract it from the source voltage right?
      $endgroup$
      – AugieJavax98
      May 1 at 16:00










    • $begingroup$
      No, you do the normal voltage divider equation, and you get your answer. You don't have to subtract anything from the source. You should get answers that match your sims
      $endgroup$
      – MCG
      May 1 at 16:01













    3












    3








    3





    $begingroup$

    Your first circuit has a resistor between C and GND. You seem to have added it to your bottom resistor. You also seem to have your 1k||3k resistor calculation incorrect. 3k*1k/3k+1k is 750 ohms. Thus you should end up with a circuit like this:





    schematic





    simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab



    From here, it is simpler to do Ohms Law to find the current in the circuit, then find the voltage drops of all the resistors.



    If you must use the voltage divider rule, then you need to know if you are finding the voltage drop(s) across the resistor(s), or the voltage at the points with respect to GND, because that will make a difference to how you calculate it.



    Of course, you always have the option to simplify to 2 resistors with the R2 component in the voltage divider as (R2+R3) too. It depends what your task is.



    Another thing I noticed is you used your answer from Vb as your input voltage for your second divider equation. You should still use 6V as the supply for both equations. If you do that, you'll end up calculating answers that agree with your simulation.



    I ended up with Vb = 5.1608V and Vc = 5.035V






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Your first circuit has a resistor between C and GND. You seem to have added it to your bottom resistor. You also seem to have your 1k||3k resistor calculation incorrect. 3k*1k/3k+1k is 750 ohms. Thus you should end up with a circuit like this:





    schematic





    simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab



    From here, it is simpler to do Ohms Law to find the current in the circuit, then find the voltage drops of all the resistors.



    If you must use the voltage divider rule, then you need to know if you are finding the voltage drop(s) across the resistor(s), or the voltage at the points with respect to GND, because that will make a difference to how you calculate it.



    Of course, you always have the option to simplify to 2 resistors with the R2 component in the voltage divider as (R2+R3) too. It depends what your task is.



    Another thing I noticed is you used your answer from Vb as your input voltage for your second divider equation. You should still use 6V as the supply for both equations. If you do that, you'll end up calculating answers that agree with your simulation.



    I ended up with Vb = 5.1608V and Vc = 5.035V







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited May 1 at 15:53

























    answered May 1 at 15:37









    MCGMCG

    7,09531851




    7,09531851











    • $begingroup$
      I am asked to calculate the node voltages for B and C using the voltage divider rule
      $endgroup$
      – AugieJavax98
      May 1 at 15:44










    • $begingroup$
      So that's the node voltages with respect to GND I assume? In that case, it should be fairly straightforward now. You have demonstrated you know the voltage divider rule. Simplify the circuit to how I have it and apply it again, You should get answers that match your simulation, as I did
      $endgroup$
      – MCG
      May 1 at 15:50










    • $begingroup$
      Yes it is with respect to GND. I will try again.
      $endgroup$
      – AugieJavax98
      May 1 at 15:55










    • $begingroup$
      When I get the answer from the divider equation, I have to subtract it from the source voltage right?
      $endgroup$
      – AugieJavax98
      May 1 at 16:00










    • $begingroup$
      No, you do the normal voltage divider equation, and you get your answer. You don't have to subtract anything from the source. You should get answers that match your sims
      $endgroup$
      – MCG
      May 1 at 16:01
















    • $begingroup$
      I am asked to calculate the node voltages for B and C using the voltage divider rule
      $endgroup$
      – AugieJavax98
      May 1 at 15:44










    • $begingroup$
      So that's the node voltages with respect to GND I assume? In that case, it should be fairly straightforward now. You have demonstrated you know the voltage divider rule. Simplify the circuit to how I have it and apply it again, You should get answers that match your simulation, as I did
      $endgroup$
      – MCG
      May 1 at 15:50










    • $begingroup$
      Yes it is with respect to GND. I will try again.
      $endgroup$
      – AugieJavax98
      May 1 at 15:55










    • $begingroup$
      When I get the answer from the divider equation, I have to subtract it from the source voltage right?
      $endgroup$
      – AugieJavax98
      May 1 at 16:00










    • $begingroup$
      No, you do the normal voltage divider equation, and you get your answer. You don't have to subtract anything from the source. You should get answers that match your sims
      $endgroup$
      – MCG
      May 1 at 16:01















    $begingroup$
    I am asked to calculate the node voltages for B and C using the voltage divider rule
    $endgroup$
    – AugieJavax98
    May 1 at 15:44




    $begingroup$
    I am asked to calculate the node voltages for B and C using the voltage divider rule
    $endgroup$
    – AugieJavax98
    May 1 at 15:44












    $begingroup$
    So that's the node voltages with respect to GND I assume? In that case, it should be fairly straightforward now. You have demonstrated you know the voltage divider rule. Simplify the circuit to how I have it and apply it again, You should get answers that match your simulation, as I did
    $endgroup$
    – MCG
    May 1 at 15:50




    $begingroup$
    So that's the node voltages with respect to GND I assume? In that case, it should be fairly straightforward now. You have demonstrated you know the voltage divider rule. Simplify the circuit to how I have it and apply it again, You should get answers that match your simulation, as I did
    $endgroup$
    – MCG
    May 1 at 15:50












    $begingroup$
    Yes it is with respect to GND. I will try again.
    $endgroup$
    – AugieJavax98
    May 1 at 15:55




    $begingroup$
    Yes it is with respect to GND. I will try again.
    $endgroup$
    – AugieJavax98
    May 1 at 15:55












    $begingroup$
    When I get the answer from the divider equation, I have to subtract it from the source voltage right?
    $endgroup$
    – AugieJavax98
    May 1 at 16:00




    $begingroup$
    When I get the answer from the divider equation, I have to subtract it from the source voltage right?
    $endgroup$
    – AugieJavax98
    May 1 at 16:00












    $begingroup$
    No, you do the normal voltage divider equation, and you get your answer. You don't have to subtract anything from the source. You should get answers that match your sims
    $endgroup$
    – MCG
    May 1 at 16:01




    $begingroup$
    No, you do the normal voltage divider equation, and you get your answer. You don't have to subtract anything from the source. You should get answers that match your sims
    $endgroup$
    – MCG
    May 1 at 16:01













    2












    $begingroup$

    The calculation for 1k and 3k resistors looks wrong:



    $R_eq=frac1frac11000+frac13000=frac3000*10001000+3000=750Omega$






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      R8 is missing as well..
      $endgroup$
      – Eugene Sh.
      May 1 at 15:20










    • $begingroup$
      R8 got rolled into the 32k, the total for all three would be 30.75k
      $endgroup$
      – laptop2d
      May 1 at 15:21











    • $begingroup$
      Well, then it can't have BC voltage
      $endgroup$
      – Eugene Sh.
      May 1 at 15:22










    • $begingroup$
      I see your point
      $endgroup$
      – laptop2d
      May 1 at 15:22















    2












    $begingroup$

    The calculation for 1k and 3k resistors looks wrong:



    $R_eq=frac1frac11000+frac13000=frac3000*10001000+3000=750Omega$






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      R8 is missing as well..
      $endgroup$
      – Eugene Sh.
      May 1 at 15:20










    • $begingroup$
      R8 got rolled into the 32k, the total for all three would be 30.75k
      $endgroup$
      – laptop2d
      May 1 at 15:21











    • $begingroup$
      Well, then it can't have BC voltage
      $endgroup$
      – Eugene Sh.
      May 1 at 15:22










    • $begingroup$
      I see your point
      $endgroup$
      – laptop2d
      May 1 at 15:22













    2












    2








    2





    $begingroup$

    The calculation for 1k and 3k resistors looks wrong:



    $R_eq=frac1frac11000+frac13000=frac3000*10001000+3000=750Omega$






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    The calculation for 1k and 3k resistors looks wrong:



    $R_eq=frac1frac11000+frac13000=frac3000*10001000+3000=750Omega$







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited May 1 at 15:21

























    answered May 1 at 15:19









    laptop2dlaptop2d

    29.3k123787




    29.3k123787











    • $begingroup$
      R8 is missing as well..
      $endgroup$
      – Eugene Sh.
      May 1 at 15:20










    • $begingroup$
      R8 got rolled into the 32k, the total for all three would be 30.75k
      $endgroup$
      – laptop2d
      May 1 at 15:21











    • $begingroup$
      Well, then it can't have BC voltage
      $endgroup$
      – Eugene Sh.
      May 1 at 15:22










    • $begingroup$
      I see your point
      $endgroup$
      – laptop2d
      May 1 at 15:22
















    • $begingroup$
      R8 is missing as well..
      $endgroup$
      – Eugene Sh.
      May 1 at 15:20










    • $begingroup$
      R8 got rolled into the 32k, the total for all three would be 30.75k
      $endgroup$
      – laptop2d
      May 1 at 15:21











    • $begingroup$
      Well, then it can't have BC voltage
      $endgroup$
      – Eugene Sh.
      May 1 at 15:22










    • $begingroup$
      I see your point
      $endgroup$
      – laptop2d
      May 1 at 15:22















    $begingroup$
    R8 is missing as well..
    $endgroup$
    – Eugene Sh.
    May 1 at 15:20




    $begingroup$
    R8 is missing as well..
    $endgroup$
    – Eugene Sh.
    May 1 at 15:20












    $begingroup$
    R8 got rolled into the 32k, the total for all three would be 30.75k
    $endgroup$
    – laptop2d
    May 1 at 15:21





    $begingroup$
    R8 got rolled into the 32k, the total for all three would be 30.75k
    $endgroup$
    – laptop2d
    May 1 at 15:21













    $begingroup$
    Well, then it can't have BC voltage
    $endgroup$
    – Eugene Sh.
    May 1 at 15:22




    $begingroup$
    Well, then it can't have BC voltage
    $endgroup$
    – Eugene Sh.
    May 1 at 15:22












    $begingroup$
    I see your point
    $endgroup$
    – laptop2d
    May 1 at 15:22




    $begingroup$
    I see your point
    $endgroup$
    – laptop2d
    May 1 at 15:22











    2












    $begingroup$

    First off, you incorrectly reduced the combination of 1k||3k to 2.35k. This is incorrect on it's face since whenever you have resistors in parallel, the combined resistance is less than either resistance. You should use the formula (1/R1 + 1/R2 + ... + 1/Rn)^-1 to reduce the parallel circuit. When this is applied you get a more reasonable value of 750.



    Second, you mislabeled node C. On the top circuit it is the node between R6||R7 and R8. On the bottom circuit, it is tied to ground.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      2












      $begingroup$

      First off, you incorrectly reduced the combination of 1k||3k to 2.35k. This is incorrect on it's face since whenever you have resistors in parallel, the combined resistance is less than either resistance. You should use the formula (1/R1 + 1/R2 + ... + 1/Rn)^-1 to reduce the parallel circuit. When this is applied you get a more reasonable value of 750.



      Second, you mislabeled node C. On the top circuit it is the node between R6||R7 and R8. On the bottom circuit, it is tied to ground.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        First off, you incorrectly reduced the combination of 1k||3k to 2.35k. This is incorrect on it's face since whenever you have resistors in parallel, the combined resistance is less than either resistance. You should use the formula (1/R1 + 1/R2 + ... + 1/Rn)^-1 to reduce the parallel circuit. When this is applied you get a more reasonable value of 750.



        Second, you mislabeled node C. On the top circuit it is the node between R6||R7 and R8. On the bottom circuit, it is tied to ground.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        First off, you incorrectly reduced the combination of 1k||3k to 2.35k. This is incorrect on it's face since whenever you have resistors in parallel, the combined resistance is less than either resistance. You should use the formula (1/R1 + 1/R2 + ... + 1/Rn)^-1 to reduce the parallel circuit. When this is applied you get a more reasonable value of 750.



        Second, you mislabeled node C. On the top circuit it is the node between R6||R7 and R8. On the bottom circuit, it is tied to ground.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered May 1 at 15:24









        OscillonoscopeOscillonoscope

        1244




        1244



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f436409%2fhow-to-calculate-the-node-voltages-for-this-circuit-using-the-voltage-divider-ru%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Club Baloncesto Breogán Índice Historia | Pavillón | Nome | O Breogán na cultura popular | Xogadores | Adestradores | Presidentes | Palmarés | Historial | Líderes | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegacióncbbreogan.galCadroGuía oficial da ACB 2009-10, páxina 201Guía oficial ACB 1992, páxina 183. Editorial DB.É de 6.500 espectadores sentados axeitándose á última normativa"Estudiantes Junior, entre as mellores canteiras"o orixinalHemeroteca El Mundo Deportivo, 16 setembro de 1970, páxina 12Historia do BreogánAlfredo Pérez, o último canoneiroHistoria C.B. BreogánHemeroteca de El Mundo DeportivoJimmy Wright, norteamericano do Breogán deixará Lugo por ameazas de morteResultados de Breogán en 1986-87Resultados de Breogán en 1990-91Ficha de Velimir Perasović en acb.comResultados de Breogán en 1994-95Breogán arrasa al Barça. "El Mundo Deportivo", 27 de setembro de 1999, páxina 58CB Breogán - FC BarcelonaA FEB invita a participar nunha nova Liga EuropeaCharlie Bell na prensa estatalMáximos anotadores 2005Tempada 2005-06 : Tódolos Xogadores da Xornada""Non quero pensar nunha man negra, mais pregúntome que está a pasar""o orixinalRaúl López, orgulloso dos xogadores, presume da boa saúde económica do BreogánJulio González confirma que cesa como presidente del BreogánHomenaxe a Lisardo GómezA tempada do rexurdimento celesteEntrevista a Lisardo GómezEl COB dinamita el Pazo para forzar el quinto (69-73)Cafés Candelas, patrocinador del CB Breogán"Suso Lázare, novo presidente do Breogán"o orixinalCafés Candelas Breogán firma el mayor triunfo de la historiaEl Breogán realizará 17 homenajes por su cincuenta aniversario"O Breogán honra ao seu fundador e primeiro presidente"o orixinalMiguel Giao recibiu a homenaxe do PazoHomenaxe aos primeiros gladiadores celestesO home que nos amosa como ver o Breo co corazónTita Franco será homenaxeada polos #50anosdeBreoJulio Vila recibirá unha homenaxe in memoriam polos #50anosdeBreo"O Breogán homenaxeará aos seus aboados máis veteráns"Pechada ovación a «Capi» Sanmartín e Ricardo «Corazón de González»Homenaxe por décadas de informaciónPaco García volve ao Pazo con motivo do 50 aniversario"Resultados y clasificaciones""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, campión da Copa Princesa""O Cafés Candelas Breogán, equipo ACB"C.B. Breogán"Proxecto social"o orixinal"Centros asociados"o orixinalFicha en imdb.comMario Camus trata la recuperación del amor en 'La vieja música', su última película"Páxina web oficial""Club Baloncesto Breogán""C. B. Breogán S.A.D."eehttp://www.fegaba.com

            Vilaño, A Laracha Índice Patrimonio | Lugares e parroquias | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación43°14′52″N 8°36′03″O / 43.24775, -8.60070

            Cegueira Índice Epidemioloxía | Deficiencia visual | Tipos de cegueira | Principais causas de cegueira | Tratamento | Técnicas de adaptación e axudas | Vida dos cegos | Primeiros auxilios | Crenzas respecto das persoas cegas | Crenzas das persoas cegas | O neno deficiente visual | Aspectos psicolóxicos da cegueira | Notas | Véxase tamén | Menú de navegación54.054.154.436928256blindnessDicionario da Real Academia GalegaPortal das Palabras"International Standards: Visual Standards — Aspects and Ranges of Vision Loss with Emphasis on Population Surveys.""Visual impairment and blindness""Presentan un plan para previr a cegueira"o orixinalACCDV Associació Catalana de Cecs i Disminuïts Visuals - PMFTrachoma"Effect of gene therapy on visual function in Leber's congenital amaurosis"1844137110.1056/NEJMoa0802268Cans guía - os mellores amigos dos cegosArquivadoEscola de cans guía para cegos en Mortágua, PortugalArquivado"Tecnología para ciegos y deficientes visuales. Recopilación de recursos gratuitos en la Red""Colorino""‘COL.diesis’, escuchar los sonidos del color""COL.diesis: Transforming Colour into Melody and Implementing the Result in a Colour Sensor Device"o orixinal"Sistema de desarrollo de sinestesia color-sonido para invidentes utilizando un protocolo de audio""Enseñanza táctil - geometría y color. Juegos didácticos para niños ciegos y videntes""Sistema Constanz"L'ocupació laboral dels cecs a l'Estat espanyol està pràcticament equiparada a la de les persones amb visió, entrevista amb Pedro ZuritaONCE (Organización Nacional de Cegos de España)Prevención da cegueiraDescrición de deficiencias visuais (Disc@pnet)Braillín, un boneco atractivo para calquera neno, con ou sen discapacidade, que permite familiarizarse co sistema de escritura e lectura brailleAxudas Técnicas36838ID00897494007150-90057129528256DOID:1432HP:0000618D001766C10.597.751.941.162C97109C0155020